Skip to main content
The ISME Journal logoLink to The ISME Journal
letter
. 2014 Mar 6;8(9):1949–1952. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.29

Intragenus generalized transduction in Staphylococcus spp. by a novel giant phage

Jumpei Uchiyama 1,2,*, Iyo Takemura-Uchiyama 1, Yoshihiko Sakaguchi 3, Keiji Gamoh 4, Shin-ichiro Kato 5, Masanori Daibata 1,2, Takako Ujihara 6, Naoaki Misawa 7, Shigenobu Matsuzaki 1,2
PMCID: PMC4139722  PMID: 24599069

Abstract

Bacteriophage (phage)-mediated generalized transduction is expected to contribute to the emergence of drug-resistant staphylococcal clones in various environments. In this study, novel phage S6 was isolated from sewage and used to test generalized transduction in human- and animal-derived staphylococci. Phage S6 was a novel type of giant myophage, which possessed a DNA genome that contained uracil instead of thymine, and it could infect all of the tested staphylococcal species. The phage S6 appeared to be similar to the transducing phage PBS1, which infects Bacillus spp. Moreover, phage S6 facilitated the transduction of a plasmid in Staphylococcus aureus and from S. aureus to non-aureus staphylococcal species, as well as vice versa. Transduction of methicillin resistance also occurred in S. aureus. This is the first report of successful intragenus generalized transduction among staphylococci.

Keywords: staphylococci, drug-resistance, generalized transduction, bacteriophage, RNA world, sewage.


Antibiotic-resistance genes can be exchanged via horizontal gene transfer among bacteria found in humans and animals (Finley et al., 2013). Generalized transduction, where the transfer of DNA is mediated by a bacteriophage (phage), is an important mechanism that facilitates the horizontal gene transfer of antibiotic-resistant genes. Antibiotic-resistant genes and phages originate from various environments (Weinbauer, 2004; Finley et al., 2013). In particular, sewage is the most concentrated source of both, and phage-mediated gene transfer is likely to occur among staphylococci in sewage (Colomer-Lluch et al., 2011; Finley et al., 2013).

Staphylococcus spp. are Gram-positive bacteria, which are found frequently in humans and animals, and sporadically in various environments (Vos et al., 2009). Some Staphylococcus spp. are resistant to methicillin, such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and S. pseudintermedius, which often cause serious infections in humans and animals (Doyle et al., 2012). Staphylococci are also likely to exchange genetic elements, possibly via generalized transduction, so they may acquire drug-resistant genes such as methicillin resistance. To the best of our knowledge, however, no direct evidence is available on intragenus generalized transduction in staphylococci (Novick et al., 2010).

In this study, we isolated a novel staphylococcal phage from sewage and used it to test generalized transduction in animal-derived and human-derived Staphylococcus spp. in a laboratory setting.

The bacteria used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S1 and all were cultured in tryptic soy broth, unless stated otherwise. The phage amplification conditions are described in Supplementary Table S2. All of the experiments were replicated three or six times.

Staphylococcal phage S6 was isolated from local sewage samples from Kochi, Japan, using S. aureus strain SA27 as the host strain. Electron microscopy, genome size estimation and nucleoside analysis were conducted to characterize the phage, according to published methods (Uchiyama et al., 2008, 2012; Takemura-Uchiyama et al., 2013). Phage S6 was shown to belong to the family Myoviridae with a genome size of ca. 270 kbp (Andrew et al., 2011; Deghorain and Van Melderen, 2012; Figures 1a and b and Supplementary Table S2). Uracil was used as a nucleic acid base instead of thymine in the DNA of phage S6 (Supplementary Figure S1). Tests of the host range using a published procedure (Takemura-Uchiyama et al., 2013) demonstrated that phage S6 exhibited lysis-from-without and/or plaque-forming activities in all of the animal-derived and human-derived Staphylococcus spp. we tested, including S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. felis, S. arlettae, S. kloosii, S. pettenkoferi, S. schleiferi, S. sciuri and S. pseudintermedius (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Characteristics of phage S6. (a) Morphology. Images of phage S6 with an extended tail and a contractile tail are shown on the left and right, respectively. The bars represent 100 nm. The head diameter and the extended tail length were 118.1±8.5 nm and 236.9±6.6 nm (mean±s.d., n=6), respectively. (b) Genome size estimation by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The Lambda Ladder PFG Marker (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) (left) and phage S6 DNA (right) are shown on the electrophoregram. The sizes of the molecular standards are shown at the most left of the electrophoregram. The arrow indicates the location of phage S6 DNA. (c) Experimental intragenus and intraspecies generalized transduction in Staphylococcus spp. The graph not only shows the efficiencies of transduction mediated by phage S6 from S. aureus to S. aureus, but also from S. aureus to non-aureus Staphylococcus spp., and vice versa. The bacteria were animal-derived Staphylococcus spp., including S. felis strain C16, S. sciuri strain D108 and S. pseudintermedius strain D103, and human-derived Staphylococcus spp., including S. aureus strains SA27 and RN4220 and S. epidermidis strain SE26. The means and s.d. are shown in the graph (mean±s.d.; n=3). Statistical differences are indicated by an asterisk (Student's t-test, P<0.05).

Phage S6 was found to be the largest of the known staphylococcal phages, and it cannot be classified into any known staphylococcal phage taxonomy. A search for phages similar to phage S6 showed that Bacillus phage PBS1 shared similar morphology and DNA chemistry (Hemphill and Whiteley, 1975). Phage PBS1 has the capacity to transfer large partial genomic fragments among Bacillus spp. without bias (Hemphill and Whiteley, 1975; Vettori et al., 1999). Thus, we also examined transduction in staphylococci using phage S6.

Generalized transduction experiments were conducted as follows. After the electroporation of pCU1 and selection using chloramphenicol (20 μg ml−1; Augustin et al., 1992), bacteria harboring the plasmid pCU1 were used as donor hosts. The presence of pCU1 in the donor host was confirmed by colony-direct PCR using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S3. The phages were propagated with a suitable donor host bacterium in appropriate culture conditions in the presence of chloramphenicol (20 μg ml−1; Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Figure S3). As a negative control, the phage was propagated on bacteria that did not harbor pCU1 without chloramphenicol. In the transduction experiment using the methicillin-resistant gene, the phage was propagated with MRSA strain COL. After filtration of the phage lysate using a 0.45-μm membrane filter and treatment with DNase I (10 μg ml−1; 30 min at 37 °C) in a medium containing 5 mM MgCl2, the recipient bacteria (ca. 6.4 × 108 cells ml−1) were cultured with phages at a multiplicity of infection of 1 in 1 ml or 10 ml of tryptic soy broth (30 min, 37 °C). The cultures were plated onto brain–heart infusion plates that contained an appropriate antibiotic (that is, 20 μg ml−1 chloramphenicol or 5 μg ml−1 oxacillin). To validate the transduction experiment, colony-direct PCR was conducted using 10 colonies from each group with the primers listed in Supplementary Table S3. The transduction efficiency was calculated as the ratio of the number of transductants relative to the number of bacteria before inoculation on the antibiotic-containing plate.

Transduction by phage S6 was examined in S. aureus and from S. aureus to non-aureus staphylococci, as well as vice versa, which demonstrated the transfer of the pCU1 plasmid from S. aureus to S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. felis, S. sciuri and S. pseudintermedius, and vice versa (10−7–10−10 transductants per bacteria) (Figure 1c). On the other hand, the phages propagated with bacteria that did not harbor plasmid pCU1 produced no transductants. The efficiencies of transduction from the non-aureus staphylococci (S. epidermidis, S. sciuri and S. pseudintermedius) to S. aureus were significantly higher than those from S. aureus to the non-aureus staphylococci.

Finally, phage S6, which was prepared in MRSA strain COL as a donor host, was transduced into strain RN4220. The transduction of methicillin resistance was also successful at 5.2 × 10−11±9.0 × 10−11 transductants per bacteria (mean±s.d.; n=3).

No previous studies have reported phage infectivity among various staphylococcal species and generalized transduction. The transduction activities of other phages are also of interest in staphylococci. Thus, we examined the generalized transduction activity and host range using three types of staphylococcal phages: siphophages φMR25 and 80, podophage S13′ and myophage S25-3 (Christie et al., 2010; Hoshiba et al., 2010; Takemura-Uchiyama et al., 2013) (Supplementary Table S2). Phages 80 and φMR25 were S. aureus-specific phages that exhibited transduction activities in S. aureus (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S4). Phages S13′ and S25-3 were S. aureus-specific and polyvalent phages, respectively, but they had no transduction activities in S. aureus (Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S4). Thus, in contrast to phage S6, none of the phages we tested exhibited simultaneous transduction activities and infectivity in staphylococci.

This is the first report of intragenus generalized transduction in Staphylococcus spp. that we conducted using a novel type of staphylococcal phage. The methicillin-resistant gene in MRSA is considered to have originated from animal-associated staphylococci (Tsubakishita et al., 2010; Moellering, 2011), so giant myophages such as S6 could contribute to the emergence of new types of MRSA in various environments. Moreover, if RNA is the precursor to life and phages that contain uracil-based DNAs are relics of the RNA world, giant myophages such as phages S6, PBS1 and phiR1-37, may have had important roles in the evolution of bacteria from the last universal common ancestor (Forterre, 2005; Kiljunen et al., 2005). In the future, the experimental evolution of S. aureus into MRSA will be investigated using phage S6 to elucidate the origin and emergence of MRSA.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Glenn W Kaatz, John D Dingell, VA Medical Center, USA, Professor Motoyuki Sugai, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan and Professor Asako Muraoka, Kochi Junior College, Kochi, Japan, for providing us the plasmid and some bacterial and phage strains. This study was funded by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (24791025), and the Center for Innovative and Translational Medicine, Kochi System Glycobiology Center, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on The ISME Journal website (http://www.nature.com/ismej)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table S1
Supplementary Table S2
Supplementary Table S3
Supplementary Figure S1
Supplementary Figure S2
Supplementary Figure S3
Supplementary Figure S4
Supplementary Figure Legend

References

  1. Andrew MQ, King AMQ, Lefkowitz E, Adams MJ, Carstens EB. Virus Taxonomy: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Elsevier Academic Press: Calfornia; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. Augustin J, Rosenstein R, Wieland B, Schneider U, Schnell N, Engelke G, et al. Genetic analysis of epidermin biosynthetic genes and epidermin-negative mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Eur J Biochem. 1992;204:1149–1154. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16740.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Christie GE, Matthews AM, King DG, Lane KD, Olivarez NP, Tallent SM, et al. The complete genomes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophages 80 and 80α–implications for the specificity of SaPI mobilization. Virology. 2010;407:381–390. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.08.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colomer-Lluch M, Jofre J, Muniesa M. Antibiotic resistance genes in the bacteriophage DNA fraction of environmental samples. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deghorain M, Van Melderen L. The Staphylococci phages family: an overview. Viruses. 2012;4:3316–3335. doi: 10.3390/v4123316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doyle ME, Hartmann FA, Lee Wong AC. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci: implications for our food supply. Anim Health Res Rev. 2012;13:157–180. doi: 10.1017/S1466252312000187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Finley RL, Collignon P, Larsson DG, McEwen SA, Li XZ, Gaze WH, et al. The scourge of antibiotic resistance: the important role of the environment. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:704–710. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Forterre P. The two ages of the RNA world, and the transition to the DNA world: a story of viruses and cells. Biochimie. 2005;87:793–803. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2005.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hemphill HE, Whiteley HR. Bacteriophages of Bacillus subtilis. Bacteriol Rev. 1975;39:257–315. doi: 10.1128/br.39.3.257-315.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoshiba H, Uchiyama J, Kato S, Ujihara T, Muraoka A, Daibata M, et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophage, ϕMR25, and its therapeutic potential. Arch Virol. 2010;155:545–552. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0623-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kiljunen S, Hakala K, Pinta E, Huttunen S, Pluta P, Gador A, et al. Yersiniophage phiR1-37 is a tailed bacteriophage having a 270 kb DNA genome with thymidine replaced by deoxyuridine. Microbiology. 2005;151:4093–4102. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28265-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moellering RC., Jr MRSA: the first half century. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;67:4–11. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Novick RP, Christie GE, Penadés JR. The phage-related chromosomal islands of Gram-positive bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:541–551. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Takemura-Uchiyama I, Uchiyama J, Kato S, Inoue T, Ujihara T, Ohara N, et al. Evaluating efficacy of bacteriophage therapy against Staphylococcus aureus infections using a silkworm larval infection model. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;347:52–60. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tsubakishita S, Kuwahara-Arai K, Sasaki T, Hiramatsu K. Origin and molecular evolution of the determinant of methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:4352–4359. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00356-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Uchiyama J, Maeda Y, Takemura I, Gamoh K, Matsuzaki S, Daibata M. Analysis of deoxynucleosides in bacteriophages ϕEF24C and K and the frequency of a specific restriction site in the genomes of members of the bacteriophage subfamily. Spounavirinae. Arch Virol. 2012;157:1587–1592. doi: 10.1007/s00705-012-1324-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Uchiyama J, Rashel M, Maeda Y, Takemura I, Sugihara S, Akechi K, et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel Enterococcus faecalis bacteriophage ϕEF24C as a therapeutic candidate. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;278:200–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vettori C, Stotzky G, Yoder M, Gallori E. Interaction between bacteriophage PBS1 and clay minerals and transduction of Bacillus subtilis by clay-phage complexes. Environ Microbiol. 1999;1:347–355. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.1999.00044.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, et al. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Springer Verlag: New York; The Firmicutes. 2009;Vol. 3 [Google Scholar]
  20. Weinbauer MG. Ecology of prokaryotic viruses. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004;28:127–181. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table S1
Supplementary Table S2
Supplementary Table S3
Supplementary Figure S1
Supplementary Figure S2
Supplementary Figure S3
Supplementary Figure S4
Supplementary Figure Legend

Articles from The ISME Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES