Abstract
Metal ions are known to play an important role in many neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and prion diseases. In these diseases, aberrant metal binding or improper regulation of redox active metal ions can induce oxidative stress by producing cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS). Altered metal homeostasis is also frequently seen in the diseased state. As a result, the imaging of metals in intact biological cells and tissues has been very important for understanding the role of metals in neurodegenerative diseases. A wide range of imaging techniques have been utilized, including X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM), particle induced X-ray emission (PIXE), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), laser ablation inductively coupled mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), all of which allow for the imaging of metals in biological specimens with high spatial resolution and detection sensitivity. These techniques represent unique tools for advancing the understanding of the disease mechanisms and for identifying possible targets for developing treatments. In this review, we will highlight the advances in neurodegenerative disease research facilitated by metal imaging techniques.
Introduction
Neurodegenerative protein-folding diseases are a devastating group of illnesses that involve the misfolding and aggregation of a naturally occurring protein that plays a role in the progressive deterioration of neurons.1 For a number of years, metals have been implicated in a number of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), prion diseases, and Huntington’s disease. However, their precise roles in the disease pathologies have been difficult to elucidate. Redox active metals, specifically copper and iron, are of significant interest because they are capable of forming reactive oxygen species (ROS) through Fenton chemistry.2 In this reaction, reduced iron and copper catalyze the production of hydroxyl radicals that damage proteins, DNA, and lipids through oxidative modification. This process results in oxidative stress and eventual cell death. Under normal conditions, these biologically essential metals are carefully moved through cells using specific chaperone proteins tominimize any aberrant reactions. In the diseased state, it is thought that metal homeostasis is disrupted, resulting in poor control of potentially toxic metal ions. This hypothesis also extends to non-redox active metals such as calcium and zinc,3 which are cyotoxic at high concentrations, which are often associated with neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, determining the role of metal ions in these diseases has become an important part of understanding these diseases and finding a treatment or a cure.
Imaging of biological metals is an essential tool to gain insight into how metals behave in the diseased state. Using human tissue specimens, animal models, and cell culture models, bio-imaging provides important, spatially-resolved information about how metals behave in situ. Traditional methods, such as atomic absorption and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), provide high detection sensitivity but typically involve bulk measurements using homogenized tissue. As a result, valuable information about the localization of metals on a cellular level is lost. Alternatively, spatial information can be obtained using numerous metal staining methods for cells and tissues, such as the Prussian blue stain for iron. While staining does provide spatially resolved information, it typically lacks the sensitivity for the low concentrations of most biological metals. Staining is also sensitive only to free (unbound) metal ions, and is not easily quantified.4 In contrast, bio-imaging techniques allow for the analysis of metal content in tissues or cells with sub-cellular resolution, high detection sensitivity on the order of a few μg g−1 or better and methods that are readily quantifiable, providing unique information on cellular mechanisms with respect to neurodegenerative diseases.5
This review will focus on the most widely used metal imaging techniques and how they have been applied to neurodegenerative disease research. The advantages of several bio-metal imaging techniques will be discussed, including synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM), particle induced X-ray emission (PIXE), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), electron energy loss spectroscopy, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). In addition, we highlight the impact of these techniques on understanding the role of metal ions in AD, PD, ALS, and prion diseases. Specifically, the high spatial resolution and/or detection sensitivity of these techniques make them ideal for imaging the concentration, distribution, and localization of metal ions in neurodegenerative diseases.
Imaging techniques
In recent years, significant progress has been made to improve the spatial resolution and detection sensitivity of metal imaging techniques. Most techniques offer micron to sub-micron spatial resolution and have a detection limit around 0.1 to 100 μg g−1.4 These qualities make imaging ideal for studying trace metals at the cellular and subcellular level. Table 1 summarizes the detection limit, spatial resolution, selectivity and analytical depth for each imaging technique discussed below.
Table 1.
Primary analytical imaging techniques for analysis of biological metals with the respective detection limit, spatial resolution, element selectivity, and analytical depth for each technique. Adapted from Lobinski et al.4
| Analytical imaging technique | Detection limit (μg g−1) | Spatial resolution (μm) | Selectivity | Analytical depth (μm) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XFM | 0.1–1 | 0.1–1 | Multielemental (Z ≥ 10) | >100 | AD31,34,35,62,73,91 PD104–106,125,142,143 ALS149,152,155 Prion diseases161 |
| μ-XAS | 100 | 0.1–1 | Chemical species | >100 | AD48,62,91 PD108,109,133 Prion diseases172 |
| PIXE | 1–10 | 0.2–2 | Multielemental (all Z) | 10–100 | AD34,54,74,81 PD123,124,131,139 |
| EDS (EPMA) | 100–1000 | 0.03–0.04 | Multielemental (Z ≥ 6) | 0.1–1 | AD49,70–72 PD107 |
| EELS | 1000 | 0.001 | Multielemental (Z ≥ 6) chemical species | <0.05 | AD49 PD135,137 |
| LA-ICP MS | 0.01 | 5–150 | Multielemental and isotopic | 200 | AD55 PD18,130 |
| SIMS (dynamic mode) | 0.1 | 0.05 | Multielemental and isotopic | 0.1 | AD92 |
XFM: X-ray Fluorescence Microscopy; μ-XAS: micro-X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy; PIXE: Particle Induced X-ray Emission; EDS: Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy; EPMA: Electron Probe Microanalysis; EELS: Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy; LA-ICP MS: Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry; SIMS: Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry; AD: Alzheimer’s Disease; PD: Parkinson’s Disease; ALS: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
The imaging techniques discussed here all follow similar protocols for specimen preparation and data collection. Specimen preparation is fairly straightforward, although the requirements vary depending on the technique. Cells can often be cultured directly on a thin, trace-metal free substrate. Alternatively, cells can be spun on to a substrate, which is useful for suspension cells or to dilute and disperse cells. Tissues or cells are generally flash-frozen or freeze-dried to preserve the integrity of the specimen. Tissues are typically cryosectioned to approximately 5 to 30 μm thick and mounted on a suitable substrate. Specimens are then placed in front of a focused incident beam (e.g. X-rays, protons, or laser). As a result of the beam interacting with the specimen, a particle (e.g. photon or ion) is emitted from the specimen and captured by a detector. Generally, the image is created by raster-scanning the specimen through the beam or by moving the beam across the specimen.
Synchrotron X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM)
When a beam of X-rays of sufficient energy are focused on to a specimen, the incident X-rays cause the ejection of a core shell electron, leaving a hole. As a result, an outer shell electron will relax to fill the hole by emitting a photon. The energy of the emitted photon is the difference in energies between the two shells and is characteristic of the element from which it originated.6 X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) allows for the simultaneous collection of many metal ions (Z ≥ 6), as long as the incident X-ray beam energy is greater than the binding energy of each element of interest. Recent advances in focusing optics and the high flux of third generation synchrotron sources allow the X-ray beam to be focused down to a few hundred nanometers7 (0.1 to 1 μm) and provides sub-cellular resolution.8 Using standards of known concentration, XFM data are reliably quantifiable to a detection sensitivity of 0.1 to 1 μg g−1. The high energy of the X-ray beam also allows for a large analytical depth greater than 100 μm. However, tissue specimens are normally much thinner to avoid analyzing multiple layers of cells. Specimens are mounted on thin trace-metal free substrates, such as silicon nitride or Ultralene.8
X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) can often be performed using the same experimental set up as XFM. This technique scans the energy of the incident monochromatic X-ray beam across the absorption edge of an element of interest. X-ray absorption nearedge structure (XANES) extends from a few eV before the absorption edge to about 150 eV above the edge and provides information about the oxidation state of the element. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS), from ~150 to 800 eV above the absorption edge, shows the interference between the emitted photoelectron and the neighbouring atoms, which create a backscattering effect. The backscattering can provide structural information within approximately a 5 Å radius of the atom of interest.9 XAS has been useful in studying active sites of metalloproteins including speciation and ligand binding.10
Particle induced X-ray emission (PIXE)
Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) operates under the same X-ray photon emission phenomenon as XFM, but the incident beam is composed of particles (generally protons) rather than X-rays. The particle beam encounters a metal ion, causing the ejection of an inner shell electron. An outer shell electron then relaxes, emitting a photon, which is then detected. The energy of the emitted photon is dependent upon the originating atom. The proton beam generally has an energy range between 2–4 MeV11 and allows for the simultaneous collection of any element (all Z). This technique has a spatial resolution of 0.2 to 2 μm and a detection limit of 1 to 10 μg g−1. The analytical depth of PIXE is between 10 and 100 μm. Similar to XFM, specimens need to be thin, dry, and mounted on a metal-free substrate.
PIXE is easily coupled with other techniques such as Rutherford backscattering (RBS) and scanning transmission ion microscopy (STIM). Together these three techniques provide very complementary data. RBS measures the energy scattered off of the particles after the interaction with the specimen. RBS is especially sensitive to lighter atoms such as carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, which are not easily measured by PIXE, and can be used to determine specimen thickness and density.11 STIM measures the energy loss of the incident particles after hitting the specimen and can also measure the specimen thickness. With appropriate standards, PIXE data is readily quantifiable.
Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS)
Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS), also referred to as Electron Photon Micro Analysis (EPMA), utilizes an electron beam to analyze a specimen. Similar to PIXE and XFM, the electron beam causes the ejection of an inner shell electron, resulting in the emission of an X-ray photon from the atom as an outer electron relaxes to fill the inner shell hole. Each element has a characteristic X-ray photon equal to the energy difference between the two shells, and a full energy dispersive spectrum is generally collected at each point for simultaneous analysis of multiple elements (Z ≥ 6). EDS allows for high spatial resolution between 30 and 40 nm12 and a detection limit between 100 and 1000 μg g−1. EDS is quantifiable using standards. The analytical depth is between 0.1 and 1 μm. EDS is often coupled with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) or scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to provide additional morphological information about a specimen.
Thin sections of specimens are often placed on TEM grids. These grids are usually made of nickel, copper or beryllium with conductive carbon film substrates.13 Similar to the other imaging techniques, biological specimen preparation for EDS usually involves flash freezing and freeze-drying to preserve the sample.
Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS)
Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) utilizes an electron beam of known kinetic energy and measures the energy lost by the electron through inelastic scattering with the specimen. This energy loss is characteristic of the element that scattered the electron. Information about chemical bonds and the electronic structure of the material can be obtained.14 EELS is especially useful for imaging low-Z elements like carbon, but can be used with elements as large as the 3d metals (through zinc). EELS has a spatial resolution around 0.001 μm and single atoms, such as iron and calcium, have been detected in biological specimens,.15 The detection sensitivity is approximately 1000 μg g−1 and an analytical depth of 50 nm makes EELS a surface sensitive technique. EELS is often used in conjunction with EDS, TEM or SEM.
Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)
Laser Ablation-ICP-MS (LA-ICP-MS) utilizes a focused laser beam to ionize part of a specimen. The laser-ablated specimen is sent through an ICP, which atomizes and ionizes the specimen.16 The ions are then sent through an MS and separated by their mass-to-charge ratio. In this way, isotopic information can be attained as well as elemental analysis. Since the laser ablates only one area at a time, this technique is spatially resolved. Current lasers can be focused to about 5 to 150 μm on the specimen. LA-ICP-MS has a detection limit of approximately 0.01 μg g−1. LA-ICP-MS is destructive to the specimen because a laser leaves behind a small pit the size of the analytical volume (~200 μm deep). This technique can be difficult to quantify due to a lack of standard reference materials so homemade matrix-matched standards are required for quantification.17 Cryosections of biological tissues are also recommended for LA-ICP-MS, usually around 20–30 μm thick. Sections can be placed on TEM grids for electron microscope analysis prior to LA-ICP-MS. Using thicker specimens, three-dimensional images have been created by repeatedly raster scanning a specimen. As the ablated region is roughly the same depth at each point, multiple images can be created and stacked to form a three-dimensional image.18
Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)
Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) imaging measures the secondary ions that are removed from the specimen as a result of the collision with a primary ion beam. The secondary ions are separated using their mass to charge ratio measured with a quadrupole or time-of-flight mass analyzer.19 The primary ion beam (e.g. cesium or molecular oxygen cations) used depends on the element or molecule of interest. For the detection of most metals, an oxygen ion beam is often used because it favors the formation of positive ions. Similar to LA-ICP-MS, this method is also destructive to the specimen.20 The latest instruments provide ~50 nm lateral resolution.12 SIMS operates in one of two modes, static or dynamic. Static SIMS uses a lower intensity primary beam, stays very close to the specimen’s surface, and generates larger fragments such as intact molecules. Dynamic SIMS requires a higher intensity beam., and has a detection limit around 0.01 μg g−1. This technique penetrates deeper into the specimen (0.1 μm) and produces smaller fragments, making it ideal for elemental analysis.4 SIMS experiments can be more difficult to perform because the technique requires specimens to withstand ultra-high vacuum in the analysis chamber.21
Applications
Alzheimer’s disease
AD is the most common age-related neurodegenerative disease, affecting approximately 2% of the population in industrialized countries.22 Clinically, AD is characterized by memory loss and diminished cognitive functioning. Pathologically, amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) are found in the AD brain.23 The amyloid plaques consist primarily of aggregated amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide, which is produced by the cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP). The functions of both Aβ and APP are unclear, but there is evidence that APP may regulate neuronal survival, neurite outgrowth, synaptic plasticity, and cell adhesion.24 NFTs are formed from paired helical filaments of hyperphosphorylated tau, a microtubule-associated protein, and are found in other neurodegenerative diseases such as frontotemporal dementia.25
It is becoming clear that AD is a complex disease that involves other factors related to protein aggregation.26 For example, amyloid accumulations have been found in cognitively normal specimens and some AD patients have no amyloid deposits.27 Additionally, a number of amyloid-independent mechanisms have been linked to AD. For example, the familial AD mutations in APP and PS1 can lead to defective autophagy and lysosomal proteolysis,26,28,29 and there is strong evidence that reduced cerebral blood flow, as in chronic cerebral hypoperfusion, is strongly related to an increased propensity for developing AD.30 The complexity of AD has made the etiology of the disease very difficult to elucidate.
Metals have been implicated in AD for more than half a century, when large iron deposits were observed in AD brains using a Prussian blue iron stain.31 Since then, the role of metal ions such as iron, copper, zinc, and aluminium, has been studied extensively in AD. In recent years, numerous metal imaging studies have been performed on both human tissue and AD mouse models to determine the distribution of metal ions in neurological tissue and understand if/how metal ion homeostasis is disrupted during the course of the disease. However, the precise role of metal ions in the disease pathology is still unclear.
Metals and Aβ plaques
Human Aβ plaques have been shown to contain a high concentration of metal ions, and copper and zinc have been co-purified with Aβ plaques.32 Several metal imaging studies have also demonstrated relatively high concentrations of metals inside the plaques compared to surrounding tissue. Specifically, Lovell and coworkers used PIXE to show that the rim and core of human senile plaques contained elevated iron, copper, and zinc.33 Similar findings were reported more recently using XFM, where iron, copper, and zinc were elevated in the plaques compared to the surrounding tissue in human AD specimens by 177%, 466%, and 339%, respectively.34,35
The Aβ peptide contains binding sites for both copper and zinc via histidine residues, which may account for their presence in the plaque.36 Copper is able to bind Aβ1–42 with attomolar affinity and can induce the precipitation of Aβ in mildly acidic conditions.36 The AD brain is slightly acidic so the presence of copper could provide a mechanism for plaque formation. Copper also interacts with Aβ to form oligomers, which are thought to be the most neurotoxic form of the protein.37 Copper-binding to Aβ involves a redox process that reduces copper while creating damaging ROS, such as hydrogen peroxide, that are toxic to neurons.32,38 Interestingly, Aβ was not toxic to cells in culture without copper (II) present.32 Zinc can also bind to Aβ but with lower (micromolar) affinity and is capable of inducing Aβ aggregation at physiological pH.39,40
In vitro experiments have shown that the strict removal of metal ions from buffer solutions can inhibit Aβ aggregation.41 This indicates that very low metal ion concentrations can induce aggregation; thus, there could be enough free copper and zinc from synaptic transmissions to form Aβ aggregates.42,43 Metal chelators have been suggested as a potential therapeutic option to inhibit Aβ aggregation. The use of clioquinol, a copper and zinc chelator, has reduced the Aβ plaque burden in Tg2576 mice by 49%.44 Treatment of the same AD mouse model with tetrathiomolybdate, a copper complexing agent, reduced copper levels in the brain and Aβ plaque burden when used preventatively, but not when used as a treatment.45 This suggests that early treatment may be critical to reducing plaque burden through chelation.
Unlike copper and zinc, the iron in the plaques does not appear to directly interact with Aβ.46 The presence of iron in human Aβ plaques was originally identified through immunostaining as ferritin, the primary iron storage protein in the brain.47 More recently, XAS was used to identify biogenic magnetite and/or maghematite in the plaque cores of human specimens, suggesting an abnormal biomineralization process is occurring within the plaque or surrounding tissue.48,49 The size distribution of the magnetite cores implies the formation of a ferritin precursor, implicating a malfunction in ferritin. Magnetite contains a mixture of iron (II) and iron (III) so it also capable of inducing oxidative stress.
Mouse models of AD provide several advantages over human studies in the control of genetics and for time course studies to determine the order of pathological events. One such model is the PSAPP mouse, which develops amyloid pathology as well as learning and memory impairments by 6 months of age, but does not show signs of neurodegeneration.50 Using XFM and normalized to the protein density in the plaque, these mice did not exhibit an elevation in copper or iron throughout the course of the disease, and only a slight increase in zinc was found at the late stages of the disease (Fig. 1).35,51 In contrast, the CRND-8 mouse, which develops amyloid pathology and memory deficits at a younger age (i.e. by 3 months), as well as neuronal and axonal degeneration,52,53 showed a 2- to 3-fold increase in the amount of iron, copper, and zinc in the plaques at 6 months of age, as demonstrated by PIXE coupled with STM and RBS.54 Similar findings were observed with LA-ICP-MS analysis of plaques from the TASTPM mouse that develops plaques at 4 months of age.55
Fig. 1.
XFM reveals the metal content within the plaques and surrounding tissue of PSAPP mice, a model of AD. (A) Thioflavin S-stained PSAPP mouse brain tissue. XFM microprobe images of (B) zinc, (C) copper, (D) iron, and (E) calcium distribution in the same tissue. (F) XFM microprobe spectra from the center of a plaque (cyan) and from the surrounding normal tissue (red). All scale bars are 5 μm. (From Leskovjan et al.51).
In all of the mouse models, the relatively small amount of metal in the plaques compared to human plaques is very intriguing. However, since the life span of a mouse is only ~2 years, mouse plaques are typically “younger” than human plaques, suggesting that, as plaques “age”, they accumulate metal ions. In other words, metal ions do not likely cause plaques to form; rather, metal-binding occurs over time, where there is a time lapse between plaque formation and metal accumulation, such that older plaques contain more metal.
The metal content in the plaques is also correlated with the degree of neurodegeneration, where humans exhibit high metal concentration in the plaques and high neurodegeneration, whereas the mouse models show very little metal uptake and neuron death. The differences between the human plaques and those in the mouse models could demonstrate that an imbalance of metal homeostasis is a source of metal ions that accumulate in the plaques. Alternatively, the “aged” metallated plaques could provide a source of toxic metal ions.
In addition to the brain, the retina has also been shown to have several abnormalities in early-AD patients56 and contain Aβ plaques.57 The retina can be readily imaged non-invasively with high resolution and sensitivity using optical coherence tomography (OCT), which has been done successfully with live AD mice (APPSWE/PS1ΔE9).58 It was recently shown that functionalized iron oxide microparticles can be used as contrast agents to improve the quality of OCT images.59 Thus, it is possible that these iron oxide microparticles could be used to identify Aβ plaques in the retina, and could provide a valuable tool for early AD diagnosis.
Metals and NFTs
Tau stabilizes neuronal microtubules, aids in neuronal development and plasticity,60 and is the primary component in NFTs.25 Alpha-helical segments of hyperphosphorlyated tau are known to form paired helical filaments (PHFs) that can become NFTs. NFTs have also been associated with metal abnormalities including a 10-fold increase in iron and a 6-fold increase in copper. Smaller increases in zinc have been found in ubiquitin positive areas associated with human NFTs.61–63
Tau contains multiple microtubule binding domains where the second and third binding domains have an affinity for copper.60,64 With the addition of copper, both domains are capable of converting to an alpha-helical conformation, indicating copper can enhance the formation of the NFTs.60 Iron (III) has also been found to induce aggregation of hyperphosphorylated tau and can form PHFs, similar to copper.65 Additionally, the treatment of iron (III)-containing tau aggregates with reducing agents in vitro releases iron (II) and re-solubilizes the aggregates. The release of iron (II) could further add to the oxidative stress seen in AD through the creation of ROS.
Aluminium and Alzheimer’s disease
In addition to physiologically-essential metals such as iron, copper, and zinc, several studies have implicated aluminium in AD, as it has also been found to associate with Aβ plaques and NFTs. Aluminium was first linked to AD in 1965 when alum-treated rabbits were found to have NFTs similar to those seen in human AD patients.66,67 Pearl and Brody later showed that neurons with NFTs contained aluminium,68 which was directly bound to the NFTs.69 A few other studies have also found aluminium in the NFTs and senile plaques from human tissues using EDS.49,70–72 However, the majority of published studies did not find aluminium in the NFTs or plaques and suggested that experimental flaws accounted for the presence of aluminium in previous studies.73–75 For example, a large increase in aluminium was found in NFTs and healthy tissue fixed with osmium tetroxide, a common tissue fixative, but not in unfixed flash frozen specimens. Thus specimen preparation may have contaminated the tissues with aluminium.76 Other studies have indicated that the aluminium may be a result of dust on the specimen.49,71 Therefore, careful specimen preparation and handling are important factors in obtaining accurate metal data.
Despite its possible presence in plaques and NFTs, aluminium is not believed to be the etiologic origin of AD.77,78 Aluminium is likely brought into the body through food and the environment79 and enters through the weakened blood brain barrier of AD patients,80 where it is able to interact with the plaques and NFTs.
Metal homeostasis
In addition to metal ions accumulating in plaques and NFTs, metal ion dysregulation has been observed in AD. Using PIXE, elevated zinc was found in the amygdala, hippocampus,81 and neuropils33 of human AD brains. The increased zinc is potentially attributed to the zinc enriched neurons (ZEN) found in these regions, which maintain a pool of zinc for synaptic release and contain zinc transporter proteins. It is hypothesized that zinc released from the neurons can react with Aβ to facilitate aggregation82 as zinc can induce the precipitation of Aβ40.83 The precipitation of Aβ is considered neuroprotective because it eliminates the more toxic oligomeric form.84 However, the sequestration of zinc by Aβ can prevent it from reaching its normal physiological targets, such as NMDA receptors,85 where zinc acts as an inhibitor.86 Without sufficient zinc, excitotoxicity can occur. Additionally, the reuptake of zinc is energy dependent, and in AD, it has been suggested that mitochondrial energy production failure results in increased free zinc, which can also interact with Aβ.85
Iron homeostasis is also altered in AD. Elevated iron was found in several human studies in the motor cortex,87 hippocampus, 88 basal ganglia, putamen,89 cerebellum and cortex.90 In the PSAPP mouse model, an increase in iron was also found in the cortex and hippocampus.35 Fig. 2 shows the distribution of iron, as well as zinc and copper, from the hippocampus of PSAPP mice using XFM. This increase was observed early in the disease – coincident with the onset of plaque formation. Ferritin, the primary iron storage protein in the brain, is often thought to be involved in the changes in iron homeostasis in the AD brain.87 Increased iron was found in the brains of APP/V7171 mice, and determined to be primarily iron (III) and likely complexed with ferritin, based on XAS analysis.91 Using TEM and nano-SIMS, ferritin has been observed in the coronal region of human AD plaques, which is associated with the non-Aβ component of the plaques where other proteins are located.92 Ferritin was also co-localized with hemosiderin in the sulfur-rich dystrophic neurites and in the glial cells. The presence of ferritin and hemosiderin indicate impaired iron clearance. It is possible that the ferritin, which normally stores redox inactive iron (III), may become dysfunctional in the AD brain and bind iron (II), leading to oxidative stress reactions. Additionally, hemosiderin binds iron (II) only loosely, potentially resulting in further oxidative damage.
Fig. 2.
XFM analysis of iron, copper, and zinc from the PSAPP mouse hippocampus. Spatial distribution of iron, copper, and zinc in the hippocampus of PSAPP and CNT mice measured using XFM. (A) H&E stained hippocampal brain section from a PSAPP mouse. XFM images of (B) iron, (C) zinc, and (D) copper in a serial tissue section. Units are mM. Scale bar=300 μm. (E) Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was used to create unsupervised regions of interest (ROIs) based on iron, copper, and zinc content in order to compare metal content in separate regions of the hippocampus. On average, four clusters were required to separate the images into histological ROIs where the dendritic layer is gray, the PCL is green, CA3 is blue, and the hilus is magenta. These areas corresponded to distinct anatomical regions of the hippocampus defining four distinct regions of the hippocampus. (F) Average XFM spectra from each ROI (from Leskovjan et al.35).
While the reason for altered iron homeostasis is unclear, the excess iron can have major consequences that may impact the progression of AD. First, the increased presence of iron can lead to the production of ROS. Oxidative damage from ROS is known to kill neurons, but may also extend to other cellular components. For example, evidence of lipid peroxidation has also been observed in the PSAPP mouse model of AD.93 Second, an increase in iron results in increased APP expression and provides the potential for more Aβ production.94 Iron is also associated with furin, which modulates α-secretase and β-secretase activty. When iron levels are high, the furin activity is decreased, encouraging the use of β-secretase, which produces the amyoidgenic Aβ.95,96
The increase in iron also demonstrates its role as a potential biomarker for early diagnosis through clinical imaging because amyloid pathology is thought to develop well before the onset of symptoms. This would be key to treating AD because pre-clinical stages are thought to occur years before the onset of symptoms.97 Early identification would allow treatments to begin before significant neuronal death has occurred, when they are more likely to be effective.35
Parkinson’s disease
PD is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Symptoms of PD include tremors, rigidity, and difficulty walking. Advanced stages of the disease bring on cognitive and behavioral deficits such as dementia. PD is characterized by a loss of dopaminergic neurons, specifically in the substantia nigra (SN), resulting in decreased production of the neurotransmitter dopamine. Dopamine is the precursor to neuromelanin, the pigment that gives the SN its dark color.98 PD patients also develop cytoplasmic Lewy bodies, which contain aggregates of α-synuclein, a protein whose normal physiological and pathological roles are unknown.99 As PD progresses, the effectiveness of levodopa, the most common treatment for the disease, diminishes. The drug also has numerous severe side effects including psychosis and dyskinesia,100 which makes new treatment options highly desirable.
Metals have been shown to interact with both α-synuclein and neuromelanin. Studies have shown that α-synuclein has at least three copper (II) binding sites.101 Upon binding copper, the aggregation propensity of α-synuclein increases.102 In contrast, neuromelanin has the ability to bind iron with high affinity, thus suggesting that it plays a neuroprotective role by limiting free radical damage.103 Therefore, both copper and iron homeostasis may be affected in PD, making them the primary elements of interest in metal imaging studies.61
PD is similar to manganism, which results from toxic exposure to manganese, and is most commonly found in miners, smelters, and welders who have high exposure to manganese. While the symptoms of manganism and PD are very similar, the globus pallidus (GP) is the most affected brain region in manganism rather than the SN.104 Due to the disease similarities, manganese is also thought to play a role in PD and is frequently used in PD models.
Metals in the substantia nigra and cortex
In PD, the metal concentration and distribution in the brain have been shown to be altered. Specifically, XFM has been used to show an increase in iron, copper, and zinc in human SN neurons,105 where iron shows the largest increase in the midbrain SN. Additional XFM experiments showed that iron was also elevated in the laminae that defines the putamen and globus pallidus of human PD specimens.106 Interestingly, the iron content was independent of the density of remaining dopaminergic neurons.107 This lack of correlation indicates that iron elevation is an intrinsic change in PD, but is not related to disease severity. Moreover, XAS studies have shown that iron (III) is the predominant iron species in the SN neurons of both PD specimens and healthy controls.108 Copper speciation also identified predominately as copper (II) in single nerve cells in the SN, though no differences in copper speciation were found between human PD and control specimens.109 The oxidized forms of iron (III) and copper (II) are less prone to redox damage via ROS formation
The cause of elevated iron content is unclear, but iron metabolism, including iron transport, uptake, and storage, is believed to be disrupted in PD.110,111 The increased iron is attributed to iron transport proteins, such as transferrin, ferritin, and divalent metal transporter-1 (DMT-1).111 DMT-1 expression is increased after exposure to the neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin (MPTP), causing iron accumulation and a loss of dopaminergic neurons.112 Transferrin is increased in the dopaminergic neurons of the SN in PD rat and monkey models.113 Oxidative modification of transferrin by rotenone, a neurotoxin linked to PD, is known to release ferrous iron. Increased ferritin has also been associated with PD in the basal ganglia, even at very early stages of the disease.114 Thus, all of these events involving iron proteins result in additional iron in the PD brain and increase the potential for oxidative stress.
Metals and α-synuclein
α-Synuclein is a known metal-binding protein. Metals added to α-synuclein monomers in vitro have decreased the aggregation time from 2 weeks with no metal to 1 day with iron, aluminium, cobalt, and copper.102 While α-synuclein is capable of binding several metals, it has an exceptionally high affinity for copper. In vitro studies have shown that α-synuclein contains 2 high affinity copper binding sites (~0.1–50 μM) and at least one additional copper binding site with a lower affinity (400–500 μM).101 As an intrinsically disordered protein, it has been hypothesized that the long-range interactions are disrupted upon metal binding, which subsequently destabilizes the protein and induces aggregation.101,115,116 In the cytoplasm, α-synuclein is known to be unstructured but maintains an α-helical conformation in the plasma membrane.117 With 24 negatively charged residues at neutral pH,118 metal binding is hypothesized to neutralize these charges;102 though, the effect of copper binding to α-synuclein and subsequent oligomerization remains unclear.119
Metals and neuromelanin
Neuromelanin is also capable of binding metals, specifically iron.120 Approximately 10–20% of the iron found in a healthy SN is bound to neuromelanin.121 The binding sites in neuromelanin include catechol, carboxylic acid, and benzothiazine functional groups.122 PIXE imaging of the SN of human specimens showed iron colocalized with neuromelanin in the neurons but there was no difference in iron concentration between PD and healthy control subjects (see Fig. 3).61,123 Moreover, XFM studies of neuromelanin granules revealed that those from glial cells and those released from dead cells had the largest amounts of iron.124 Less iron was found in the neuromelanin of surviving neurons. Neuromelanin appears to bind primarily iron (III) andis suggested to be an iron storage compound in dopaminergic neurons.103,125 In the neuromelanin granules, the spectroscopy showed a shift from iron (II) towards iron (III) as the cells deteriorated,126 suggesting the iron changed in the neurodegenerative process, possibly through the production of ROS.
Fig. 3.

Visible light image (left) and PIXE elemental maps for phosphorus, sulfur, iron, calcium, copper and nickel from two neuromelanin containing dopaminergic neurons, from a control specimen (top) and from a PD specimen (bottom). The iron image shows that there is no difference in concentration between the control and the PD specimen. Reprinted from Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 260, Reinert et al., High resolution quantitative element mapping of neuromelanin-containing neurons, pages 227–230, copyright 2007, with permission from Elsevier.123
Neuromelanin has been shown to reduce hydroxyl radicals, a product of the Fenton reaction and oxidative stress.127 As a result, neuromelanin is generally considered neuroprotective. However, neuromelanin is potentially toxic when metal concentrations are too high111,128 because the iron binding sites contain different affinities. At low concentrations of iron, the high affinity binding sites are used first. However, the weaker binding sites are used in cases of high iron concentrations, as in PD, resulting in looser iron binding and the potential for the production of more hydroxyl radicals.103
PD animal models
Several animal models of PD exist, but rather than transgenic mice, most of the models involve exposure to toxins such as 6-hydroxydopamine (6OHDA),18 MPTP,129 or manganese,130 all of which cause Parkinsonian-like symptoms.
6OHDA is a neurotoxin that results in the loss of catecholaminergic neurons when injected into the SN, producing PD symptoms (reviewed in ref. 131). The toxin is brought into the neurons by dopamine and noradrenergic transporter molecules. The mechanism of toxicity is thought to involve the production of hydroxyl radicals in the presence of iron. In mice sacrificed 21 days after an injection with 6-OHDA, LA-ICP-MS results showed a 20% increase in iron in the SN on the side of the 6OHDA injection.18 This indicates a disease-dependent accumulation of iron in the SN, which could lead to increased ROS production.
MPTP is a highly lipophilic neurotoxin that readily crosses the blood brain barrier (reviewed in ref. 131). MPTP is converted to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-2,3-dihydropyridinium (MPDP) by monoamine oxidase in non-dopaminergic cells. MPDP oxidizes to form a 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium cation (MPP+) and is released by the cells. MPP+ has high affinity for dopamine, noradrenaline, and serotonin transporters, which result in the uptake of MPP+ into the dopaminergic neurons where it can impair mitochondrial function. Unilateral MPTP-lesioning caused iron content to increase 5-fold in the SN of old versus young lesioned monkeys, as determined by PIXE analysis.130 Comparing the lesioned to unlesioned (control) side of the SN, no difference in the young monkeys was observed but a 10% iron increase in the lesioned side of the older monkeys was found, indicating an age-related susceptibility to the neurotoxin. In the older monkeys, the iron was associated with intracellular ferrous iron-rich deposits in the SN. In addition, a direct correlation was found between the iron concentration and the level of iron (II), which can more readily promote free radicals and other ROS than iron (III).132
Using LA-ICP-MS, mice injected with MPTP showed a significant decrease in copper concentrations in the periventricular zone and fascia dentate.129 MPTP affects the cellular energy metabolism by depletion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Thus soon after MPTP exposure, it is plausible that copper uptake is limited. However, 28 days after the last MPTP injection, copper levels were elevated by 40% in these regions, which is thought to be a compensatory mechanism associated with recovery from exposure to the toxin, as shown in Fig. 4. Soon after exposure to MPTP, iron concentrations were increased in the interpeduncular nucleus by about 40%, but decreased slightly in the SN. Iron levels remained increased in the interpeduncular nucleus 28 days after MPTP injection but recovered to normal levels in the SN. The results of this MPTP study are opposite those of the previously mentioned 6-OHDA studies, where increases in iron were seen up to 21 days after the injection with 6-OHDA. While the MPTP model represents a wider range of PD symptoms than 6-OHDA, the effects of the MPTP are more reversible, which may account for the differences in results between the two models.133
Fig. 4.

LA-ICP-MS metal images of copper, iron, zinc and manganese representative of each group (control, 2 h, 7 d, and 28 d after the last of five daily MPTP injections). Sections are on a posterior level crossing the substantia nigra, the interpeduncular nucleus, and the hippocampus. Reprinted from J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 21, Matusch et al., Cerebral bioimaging of Cu, Fe, Zn, and Mn in the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson’s disease using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), pages 161–171, copyright 2010, with permission from Elsevier.129
Rats exposed to moderate levels of manganese showed no ultrastructural damage in the neurons and glial cells of the basal ganglia.134 However, the mitochondria of astrocytes were found to have a 700% increase in manganese compared to astrocyte mitochondria from control mice as measured by EELS and electron spectroscopy imaging. The mitochondria in the neurons also showed a 200% increase in manganese compared to control neurons. Mitochondria are known to accumulate manganese and may play a role in manganese homeostasis. The extreme manganese levels in the astrocyte mitochondria compared to the other cell types may be associated with glutamine synthetase, a manganoprotein that catalyzes the conversion of glutamic acid to glutamine. Glutamine synthetase, produced by the astrocytes, is the primary manganese component in the brain, comprising an estimated 80% of total brain manganese,135 and glutamine synthase levels are affected by with manganese exposure.136 The nucleolus and heterochromatin of the neurons and the astrocytes also showed increases in manganese. This increase may indicate that manganese is interacting with and potentially damaging the inactive heterochromatin and the active nucleolus.134
The toxicity-induced PD models produce acute symptoms, but to model the progressive neurodegeneration seen in PD, transgenic mouse models are more commonly used. One such model uses an iron regulatory protein (IRP1+/− IRP2−/−) knockout mouse.137 This model better mimics the chronic and progressive neurodegeneration and demonstrates the importance of iron homeostasis in the disease. In the knockout mice, EELS data showed a 10-fold decrease in ferritin in the axonal space compared to wild-type, despite an overall increase in total ferritin in cerebellar neurons. This reduction in ferritin from the degenerating neurons indicates there is a problem with iron trafficking even at early stages of neurodegeneration.137
PD cell culture models
Cell culture models of PD generally use PC12 cells, which synthesize and store dopamine in large neurovesicles. When exposed to nerve growth factor, the cells terminally differentiate and develop neurite-like processes, similar to the dopaminergic neurons affected in PD.138 Based on XFM data, cells exposed to subtoxic and toxic levels of manganese sequestered the manganese in the Golgi.104 However, cells exposed to toxic levels of manganese also contained manganese surrounding the nucleus. This indicates that manganese toxicity may occur when the Golgi becomes overloaded. Cells that were exposed to both manganese and brefeldin A, a compound that disintegrates the Golgi apparatus, showed a redistribution of manganese around the cell, specifically in the cytoplasm and the nucleus.104 The large concentrations of manganese in the Golgi indicate the Golgi’s vital role in manganese detoxification in the cell, but when the Golgi is compromised manganese is allowed to spread throughout the cell. There is recent evidence that proteins involved in preventing PD, such as PARK9139 and parkin140 play protective role against manganese toxicity. It is hypothesized that PARK9 and parkin may also be neuroprotective by maintaining the integrity of the Golgi apparatus.104
Significant improvements in the spatial resolution of PIXE and XFM have allowed for imaging at subcellular resolution. PIXE imaging of PC12 cells exposed to excess iron showed elevated iron in all cellular components but most notably in the distal ends.138 Copper and zinc also accumulated abnormally in the neurite-like outgrowths, as demonstrated by XFM.141 In a similar experiment, results found increased iron in the dopamine neurovesicles.142 The presence of iron-dopamine complexes suggests that dopamine may play a neuroprotective role in iron chelation. After exposure to α-methyltyrosine (ATM), an inhibitor of dopamine synthesis, iron concentrations diminished in the cells, especially the dopamine neurovesicles. It has been suggested that mutations in α-synuclein, found in familial PD, can reduce the number of dopamine neurovesicles and result in a redistribution of the iron-dopamine complexes.143 Without the proper sequestration of iron in the dopamine neurovesicles, the highly oxidizing iron-dopamine complex could lead to increased oxidative stress and a decrease in the dopamine neurovesicles. Additionally, the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in PD could lead to diminished control of the increased iron, which can result in additional oxidative damage.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
ALS is the most common motor neuron disease, with a lifetime risk of 1 in 2000.144 It is characterized by motor neuron degeneration that leads to muscle weakness followed by progressive paralysis and eventually respiratory failure. ALS is generally fatal within 3 to 5 years from the onset of symptoms. Interestingly, the age of onset is highly correlated to the rate of disease progression and survival time after the onset of symptoms. Juvenile ALS (onset before 25 years of age), as well as late onset (after the age of 65) ALS are very rare but, generally lead to very rapid progression and significantly shorter survival times than average patients (between 45 and 65 years old).145,146 The disease primarily affects the spinal cord and, at later stages, the brain stem. Approximately 90% of ALS cases are sporadic (sALS), with no known cause, but the remaining 10% have a genetic link. ALS cases with a known genetic cause are termed familial (fALS).
fALS with copper-zinc superoxide dismutase
One quarter of fALS cases are associated with mutations in the SOD1 gene, which codes for the protein copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1). Any one of over 160 known mutations in this protein can cause the disease.147 SOD1 acts as an essential antioxidant metalloenzyme, which binds one zinc atom for stability and one copper atom to neutralize superoxide radicals. In ALS, it is hypothesized that mutant forms of the protein undergo a “toxic gain of function,” in which the protein becomes a pro-oxidant, rather than an antioxidant. The gain of function is associated with aberrant metal binding or activity.144 Therefore, the effects of metals ions in ALS, especially copper and zinc have been studied extensively.144 The misfolded mutant SOD1 forms aggregates in the spinal cord motor neurons of patients. Its aggregation is thought to be neuroprotective as it sequesters the toxic soluble protein.
SOD1 mutations have a large variation in biophysical and chemical properties. Mutations are classified as either wild type-like (WTL) or metal-binding-region (MBR) mutations. The WTL mutations, such as G37R and G93A, are capable of binding copper and zinc and often maintain similar activity levels to the wild-type (WT) protein. In contrast, MBR mutations, such as H46R/H48Q, are unable to bind metal or do so with reduced affinity. As a result, the activity levels of MBR mutations are significantly reduced in comparison to WT SOD1.
Mouse models of SOD1 fALS provide excellent insight in to the disease. Mice expressing mutated human SOD1 develop progressive paralysis and SOD1 aggregates in the spinal cord motor neurons. HPLC-ICP-MS studies performed on SOD1 transgenic mice revealed that insoluble fractions of SOD1 were not enriched in metal, while the soluble fractions of WT and WTL mutations were highly metallated. Given the high stability of the WTL mutations, G37R and G93A, it is unlikely that the mature metallated proteins will aggregate. Therefore, the lack of metal in the insoluble fraction supports the hypothesis that nascent and immature proteins are more prone to aggregation.148 In an XFM study of the same mouse models of ALS, an increase in copper in the gray matter, where the SOD1 is expressed, was found in the WT and WTL mutant specimens, relative to non-transgenic (NTG) mice.148 However, this change was not seen in H46R/H48Q, a mutant that does not bind metal. A disease-specific increase in zinc was also found in the white matter of all mutants. The cause of these changes is unclear, but taken together they represent an alteration of metal homeostasis in the diseased state. Based on XFM images of zinc content, motor neuron loss was evident; Fig. 5 shows large motor neurons in the WT mouse that are absent in the symptomatic mice expressing G85R SOD1.
Fig. 5.

XFM images of iron, copper, and zinc from a portion of the ventral horn of a healthy WT mouse (top) and a symptomatic G83R mouse (bottom). Several motor neurons can be seen in the zinc image from the WT mice, while no intact motor neurons are visible in the G85R mice. The G85R mice also show an increase in iron and zinc in the gray matter.
sALS
The etiology of sALS is unknown, although it is thought to be a multifactorial disease that may include a genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers.149,150 Altered metal homeostasis is also thought to play a role in sALS. Using XFM, elevated zinc concentrations were found in the gray matter compared to the white matter in the spinal cords of sALS specimens.151 Despite the lack of redox activity in zinc, there is still the potential that changes in zinc homeostasis can result in oxidative stress by zinc ions interacting with mitochondrial metabolism.152 Zinc is also a component of glutamate excitotoxicity, which is found in patients with sALS (and fALS).153 Here, elevated zinc increases glutamate release from neurons in a toxic manner.
Pigmented creatine deposits have also been found in the brain stem and spinal cord of some sALS patients; however, their origin is unknown. XFM studies of human sALS specimens did not reveal any metal (iron, copper or zinc) in the deposits.154 The lack of metal indicates that they did not originate from the blood stream or from neuromelanin, as these sources would likely contain metal. Supplements of creatine, an organic acid involved in ATP production, have been correlated with increased survival time in ALS mouse models.155 Unfortunately, human trials with creatine supplements have had mixed results.
Prion diseases
Prion diseases are fatal neurodegenerative diseases in which the normal prion protein PrPC undergoes a conformational change to the pathogenic form PrPSc. Some studies have suggested that this process involves copper binding, where PrPC undergoes a conformational change and increases in α-helical content while decreasing in β-sheet structure.156 Indeed, PrPC contains four high-affinity copper binding sites that consist of an octarepeat sequence (PHGGGWGQ) and a fifth site with lower affinity.157–159
The precise role of PrPC is unknown, but it has been suggested to be a copper transport protein because it can bind multiple copper ions through its histidine and glycine residues in the octarepeat. The copper-PrPC complex can be endocytosed by a cell via clathrin coated pits, indicating PrPC’s potential role in copper uptake after presynaptic depolarization.160 The affinity for the copper binding sites is highly pH dependent and copper binding becomes unstable below a pH of 6.5. The pH dependence provides evidence for PrPC as a copper transporter that detects copper (II) in the extracellular matrix and then releases the copper in the lower pH of the endosomes.159 There is also evidence that PrPC plays numerous roles in other cellular processes.161 For example, PrPC can protect cultured cells against apoptosis induced by Bax, a pro-apoptotic protein.162,163 Primary neurons from Prnp0/0 mice were shown to be more susceptible to damage from ROS than neurons from WT mice, suggesting PrPC’s role as an antioxidant.164,165 Additionally, PrPC is likely to be involved in transmembrane signalling for neuronal survival and neurite outgrowth.166–169
There is also significant evidence that PrPC can mitigate oxidative stress but it is unclear whether this effect is due to the protein sequestering redox active copper or by directly acting as an antioxidant.170 Recent XAS studies have shown that zinc (II) binds to PrPC with lower affinity than copper, and induces copper (II) to bind in a redox-inactive coordination geometry, reducing the level of ROS produced.171 In prion diseases, oxidative stress is especially evident in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where calreticulin, a calcium-binding protein that resides in the ER, was recently found to inhibit aggregation of PrPC (23–98) in vitro.172 Modulating aggregation could increase oxidative damage as it may promote the smaller oligomeric form, which is generally considered more toxic.
Given the pathogenic nature of prion diseases, they have been primarily studied using animal models. In a XFM study using WT PrP mice, prion gene knock-out (Prnp−/−) mice, and overexpressing PrPC (Tga20) mice, the WT mice showed more metal in the brain than the knock-out mice and less metal than the overexpressing mice, indicating that the prion protein influences metal ion homeostasis.160 Moreover, areas of increased or decreased metal content corresponded with regions of higher or low PrPC expression, respectively. The presence of copper binding sites in PrPC provides further support regarding the increased presence of copper in regions of the brain where PrPC is over expressed.160 Specifically, the knockout mice showed lower copper in the periventricular regions, lower iron in the thalamus, hippocampus and olfactory bulbs, and reduced zinc in the hippocampus. However, in the posterior region of the lateral ventricles, iron and zinc were increased.160 The overexpressing PrPC (Tga20) mice had increased iron and copper in most regions of the brain compared to WT mice. Copper was especially high in the periventricular region, while iron was highest in the medial septal nucleus and the septal hypothalamic nucleus. However, the Tga20 mice had decreased iron, copper, and zinc in the posterior hypothalamus. The correlation between altered metal concentrations and PrPC expression demonstrates that PrPC may be involved in the regulation and distribution of metals in the central nervous system.
Clinical imaging
Due to altered metal homeostasis in a wide range of neurodegenerative diseases, clinical imaging of patients has the potential to play an important role in early diagnosis, monitoring disease progression, and the development of drug therapies. In the clinical setting, the most common metal imaging tool is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using iron due to its magnetic properties. With recent advances in high field-strength MRI, iron is now readily detectable at physiological concentrations.173 Copper and manganese also possess magnetic properties but are present in lower concentrations in the brain so imaging of these metals is extremely difficult.174 While MRI techniques possess diminished spatial resolution (~2.4 mm at 3T) compared to traditional metal imaging techniques discussed here,175 MRI provides sufficient resolution to detect regional differences and has the significant advantage of imaging living patients rather than being restricted post-mortem analysis.174
Using MRI, regional increases in iron have been seen in the brains of patients with several neurological diseases, including AD and PD.176 In AD, increased iron was found in the basil ganglia, specifically the caudate nucleus and putamen as determined using field dependent R2 increase (FDRI).177,178 The increase in iron indicates that it may be a biomarker for the disease.89,178 In patients reporting memory loss, House et al.179 found increased iron in the right temporal cortex but decreased iron in the left internal capsule compared to control subjects who reported no memory loss. They also found decreased iron levels in the frontal and temporal white matter compared to controls.179 The reduction of iron in the white matter is thought to reflect a loss of myelin in these regions. Thus, these disease-dependent changes could be important biomarkers for disease diagnosis, which is especially valuable for AD, where diagnosis today can only be confirmed by post-mortem analysis.
MRI has also been used to visualize the iron in brains of patients with PD. Increased iron has been found in the SN pars compacta, dentate nucleus, subthalamic nucleus, and basal ganglia.180 Several studies have been able to correlate an increase in iron in the SN with an increase in disease severity.175,181–183 In a study using susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), no difference was seen in iron content in the SN between early-onset (~40 years old) and later-onset (>60 years old) PD patients, but an increase in iron was found in all PD cases compared to age- and sex- matched controls.183 These studies further demonstrate the potential for disturbances in iron metabolism in PD and could prove to be a powerful biomarker in the diagnosis and treatment of the disease using MRI.
Positron emission tomography (PET) is another clinical imaging technique that shows significant promise for patients with neurodegenerative diseases.184 Advances in PET imaging have aided in the early diagnosis of PD through the use of radiotracers such as 18F-FDOPA, where studies have shown a reduced uptake of the radiotracer in the brain of PD patients.185 In addition, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), which is similar to PET but utilizes gamma ray emission, has helped to discriminate between idiopathic PD and other parkinsonian syndromes, which is important for assessing the prognosis and associated therapy.186,187 Oxidative stress has also been imaged in PD patients using a copper-62 labelled diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) radiopharmaceutical, which accumulates in regions of the brain where there are excessive electrons relative to O2 that reduce the copper (II) to copper (I).188
In AD, significant advances have been made by quantifying amyloid burden with PET imaging using the Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB), a carbon-11 labelled thioflavin-T analogue. 189,190 Unfortunately a number of cognitively normal subjects show a significant amyloid burden, which complicates the interpretation.191 However, a newer approaches exploit the changes copper homeostasis using a copper-64-labelled bis(thiosemicarbazonato)copper complex, which has a longer retention time in animal models of AD compared to control animals.192 The longer half life of copper-64 radiolabels (~12.7 h) compared to carbon-11 (20.3 min) also allows for longer synthesis times and regional distribution.192 Fluorescent copper sensors have also been developed to visualize labile copper pools in animal models of Wilson disease, a disease associated with copper overload, and in the future could be applied to neurodegenerative diseases like AD and ALS.193 With the aid of copper radiolabels and the ability to detect copper pools, alterations in copper homeostasis can be utilized to improve our understandings of the mechanisms of copper homeostasis and provide better diagnostics for neurodegenerative diseases.
Conclusions
Imaging of biological metals can aid in understanding the mechanisms of neurodegenerative diseases, as well as in their diagnosis and treatment. Imaging will continue to grow as a powerful tool for uncovering the role of metal ions in neurodegenerative diseases. Improvements in spatial resolution and detection sensitivity will be critical for providing more detailed information about the localization of metal ions, particularly on the sub-cellular level. This could be especially useful in understanding the effects of neurodegenerative diseases on the nucleus and mitochondria, which are both heavily impacted in the diseased state. Clinical imaging techniques will also prove to be invaluable in confirming the diagnosis of these diseases through the use of biomarkers, such as iron. In addition, clinical imaging offers the unique ability to monitor disease progression in patients and to determine the effects of novel drug treatments. Metal imaging techniques will continue to help expand the knowledge base of neurodegenerative diseases and provide a systematic approach to deconstructing complex mechanisms occurring in the body and may ultimately lead to a cure for neurodegenerative diseases.
Biographies
Megan W. Bourassa
Megan Bourassa received her B.S. in Chemistry from Pacific Lutheran University in Tacoma, Washington. She recently completed her Ph.D. in Chemistry at Stony Brook University, performing her research at the National Synchrotron Light Source at Brookhaven National Laboratory in the group of Dr. Lisa Miller. Her research involves the role of metal ions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Alzheimer’s disease using both X-ray fluorescence and infrared microscopy.
Lisa M. Miller
Lisa Miller is a senior biophysical chemist and Associate Division Director for Spectroscopy and Imaging at the National Synchrotron Light Source at Brookhaven National Laboratory. She is also an adjunct Associate Professor in the Departments of Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering at Stony Brook University. She obtained her Ph.D. in Biophysics from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in 1995. In 1999, Lisa became a staff scientist at BNL and received tenure in 2006. Her research involves developing and using x-ray and infrared imaging techniques to study diseases such as osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and Alzheimer’s disease.
Contributor Information
Megan W. Bourassa, Email: megan.bourassa@stonybrook.edu.
Lisa M. Miller, Email: lmiller@bnl.gov.
Notes and references
- 1.Taylor JP, Hardy J, Fischbeck KH. Toxic Proteins in Neurodegenerative Disease. Science. 2002;296:1991–1995. doi: 10.1126/science.1067122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sayre LM, Smith MA, Perry G. Chemistry and biochemistry of oxidative stress in neurodegenerative disease. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2001;8:721–738. doi: 10.2174/0929867013372922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barnham KJ, Bush AI. Metals in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2008;12:222–228. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lobinski R, Moulin C, Ortega R. Imaging and speciation of trace elements in biological environment. Biochimie. 2006;88:1591–1604. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ortega R, Devès G, Carmona A. Bio-metals imaging and speciation in cells using proton and synchrotron radiation X-ray microspectroscopy. J R Soc Interface. 2009;6:S649–S649. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0166.focus. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fahrni CJ. Biological applications of X-ray fluorescence microscopy: exploring the subcellular topography and speciation of transition metals. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2007;11:121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Paunesku T, Vogt S, Maser J, Lai B, Woloschak G. X-ray fluorescence microprobe imaging in biology and medicine. J Cell Biochem. 2006;99:1489–1502. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ralle M, Lutsenko S. Quantitative imaging of metals in tissues. BioMetals. 2009;22:197–205. doi: 10.1007/s10534-008-9200-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Janssens K, Van Grieken R. Cultural heritage conservation and environemtal impact assessment by non-destructive testing and micro-analysis. A.A. Balkema Publishers; London: 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ide-Ektessabi A. Applications of Synchrotron Radiation: Micro Beams in Cell Micro Biology and Medicine. Springer Verlag; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ortega R, Devès G, Carmona A. Bio-metals imaging and speciation in cells using proton and synchrotron radiation X-ray microspectroscopy. J R Soc Interface. 2009;6:S649–S658. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0166.focus. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McRae R, Bagchi P, Sumalekshmy S, Fahrni CJ. In Situ Imaging of Metals in Cells and Tissues. Chem Rev. 2009;109:4780–4827. doi: 10.1021/cr900223a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.LoPachin RM, Gaughan CL. Electron Probe X-Ray Microanalysis. Neurodegeneration Methods and Protocols. 1999;22:289–299. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-612-X:289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kapp N, Studer D, Gehr P, Geiser M. Electron energy-loss spectroscopy as a tool for elemental analysis in biological specimens. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;369:431–447. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-294-6_21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Leapman RD. Detecting single atoms of calcium and iron in biological structures by electron energy loss spectrum imaging. J Microsc. 2003;210:5–15. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Qin Z, Caruso JA, Lai B, Matusch A, Becker JS. Trace metal imaging with high spatial resolution: Applications in biomedicine. Metallomics. 2011;3:28–37. doi: 10.1039/c0mt00048e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Becker JS, Salber D. New mass spectrometric tools in brain research. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem. 2010;29:966–979. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hare D, Reedy B, Grimm R, Wilkins S, Volitakis I, George JL, Cherny RA, Bush AI, Finkelstein DI, Doble P. Quantitative elemental bio-imaging of Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn in 6-hydroxydopamine induced Parkinsonism mouse models. Metallomics. 2008;1:53–58. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pacholski ML, Winograd N. Imaging with Mass Spectrometry. Chem Rev. 1999;99:2977–3006. doi: 10.1021/cr980137w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Solon E, Schweitzer A, Stoeckli M, Prideaux B. Autoradiography, MALDI-MS, and SIMS-MS Imaging in Pharmaceutical Discovery and Development. AAPS J. 2010;12:11–26. doi: 10.1208/s12248-009-9158-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Petibois C. Imaging methods for elemental, chemical, molecular, and morphological analyses of single cells. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;397:2051–2065. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-3618-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mattson MP. Pathways towards and away from Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2004;430:631–639. doi: 10.1038/nature02621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alzheimer A. A new disease of the cortex (Ger) Allg Z Psychiatr. 1907;64:146–148. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mattson MP. Cellular actions of beta-amyloid precursor protein and its soluble and fibrillogenic derivatives. Physiological Reviews. 1997;77:1081–1132. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1997.77.4.1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Adlard PA, Bush AI. Metals and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2006;10:145–163. doi: 10.3233/jad-2006-102-303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pimplikar SW, Nixon RA, Robakis NK, Shen J, Tsai LH. Amyloid-independent mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. J Neurosci. 2010;30:14946–14954. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4305-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.(a) Edison P, Archer HA, Hinz R, Hammers A, Pavese N, Tai YF, Hotton G, Cutler D, Fox N, Kennedy A. Amyloid, hypometabolism, and cognition in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2007;68:501–508. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000244749.20056.d4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Edison P, Archer HA, Gerhard A, Hinz R, Pavese N, Turkheimer FE, Hammers A, Tai YF, Fox N, Kennedy A. Microglia, amyloid, and cognition in Alzheimer’s disease: An [11C](R) PK11195-PET and [11C] PIB-PET study. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;32:412–419. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Li Y, Rinne JO, Mosconi L, Pirraglia E, Rusinek H, DeSanti S, Kemppainen N, Någren K, Kim BC, Tsui W. Regional analysis of FDG and PIB-PET images in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:2169–2181. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0833-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee JH, Yu WH, Kumar A, Lee S, Mohan PS, Peterhoff CM, Wolfe DM, Martinez-Vicente M, Massey AC, Sovak G. Lysosomal proteolysis and autophagy require presenilin 1 and are disrupted by Alzheimer-related PS1 mutations. Cell. 2010;141:1146–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wong E, Cuervo AM. Autophagy gone awry in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:805–811. doi: 10.1038/nn.2575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.de la Torre JC. A turning point for Alzheimer’s disease? BioFactors. 2012;38:78–83. doi: 10.1002/biof.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Goodman L. Alzheimer’s disease: a clinico-pathologic analysis of twenty-three cases with a theory on pathogenesis. J Nerv Mental Dis. 1953;118:97–130. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Opazo C, Huang X, Cherny RA, Moir RD, Roher AE, White AR, Cappai R, Masters CL, Tanzi RE, Inestrosa NC. Metalloenzyme-like activity of Alzheimer’s disease -amyloid: Cu-dependent catalytic conversion of dopamine, cholesterol and biological reducing agents to neurotoxic H2O2. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:40302–40308. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206428200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lovell MA, Robertson JD, Teesdale WJ, Campbell JL, Markesbery WR. Copper, iron and zinc in Alzheimer’s disease senile plaques. J Neurol Sci. 1998;158:47–52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(98)00092-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Miller LM, Wang Q, Telivala TP, Smith RJ, Lanzirotti A, Miklossy J. Synchrotron-based infrared and X-ray imaging shows focalized accumulation of Cu and Zn co-localized with β-amyloid deposits in Alzheimer’s disease. J Struct Biol. 2006;155:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Leskovjan AC, Kretlow A, Lanzirotti A, Barrea R, Vogt S, Miller LM. Increased brain iron coincides with early plaque formation in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage. 2011;55:32–38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Atwood CS, Scarpa RC, Xudong H, Moir RD, Jones WD, Fairlie DP, Tanzi RE, Bush AI. Characterization of copper interactions with Alzheimer amyloid peptides: identification of an attomolar-affinity copper binding site on amyloid 1–42. J Neurochem. 2000;75:1219–1233. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0751219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Atwood CS, Perry G, Zeng H, Kato Y, Jones WD, Ling KQ, Huang X, Moir RD, Wang D, Sayre LM. Copper mediates dityrosine cross-linking of Alzheimer’s amyloid. Biochemistry. 2004;43:560–568. doi: 10.1021/bi0358824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Huang X, Atwood CS, Hartshorn MA, Multhaup G, Goldstein LE, Scarpa RC, Cuajungco MP, Gray DN, Lim J, Moir RD. The Aβ peptide of Alzheimer’s disease directly produces hydrogen peroxide through metal ion reduction. Biochemistry. 1999;38:7609–7616. doi: 10.1021/bi990438f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Huang X, Atwood CS, Moir RD, Hartshorn MA, Vonsattel JP, Tanzi RE, Bush AI. Zinc-induced Alzheimer’s Aβ 1–40 aggregation is mediated by conformational factors. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:26464–26470. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.42.26464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cherny RA, Legg JT, McLean CA, Fairlie DP, Huang X, Atwood CS, Beyreuther K, Tanzi RE, Masters CL, Bush AI. Aqueous dissolution of Alzheimer’s disease Aβ amyloid deposits by biometal depletion. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:23223–23228. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.33.23223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Huang X, Atwood CS, Moir RD, Hartshorn MA, Tanzi RE, Bush AI. Trace metal contamination initiates the apparent auto-aggregation, amyloidosis, and oligomerization of Alzheimer’s Aβ peptides. JBIC, J Biol Inorg Chem. 2004;9:954–960. doi: 10.1007/s00775-004-0602-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lee JY, Cole TB, Palmiter RD, Suh SW, Koh JY. Contribution by synaptic zinc to the gender-disparate plaque formation in human Swedish mutant APP transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:7705–7710. doi: 10.1073/pnas.092034699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schlief ML, Craig AM, Gitlin JD. NMDA receptor activation mediates copper homeostasis in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2005;25:239–246. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3699-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cherny RA, Atwood CS, Xilinas ME, Gray DN, Jones WD, McLean CA, Barnham KJ, Volitakis I, Fraser FW, Kim YS. Treatment with a copper-zinc chelator markedly and rapidly inhibits [beta]-amyloid accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mice. Neuron. 2001;30:665–676. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00317-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Quinn JF, Harris CJ, Cobb KE, Domes C, Ralle M, Brewer G, Wadsworth TL. A Copper-Lowering Strategy Attenuates Amyloid Pathology in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2010;21:903–914. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-100408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bush AI. The metallobiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:207–214. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00067-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Grundke-Iqbal I, Fleming J, Tung YC, Lassmann H, Iqbal K, Joshi JG. Ferritin is a component of the neuritic (senile) plaque in Alzheimer dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 1990;81:105–110. doi: 10.1007/BF00334497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Collingwood JF, Mikhaylova A, Davidson MR, Batich C, Streit WJ, Eskin T, Terry J, Barrea R, Underhill RS, Dobson J. High-resolution X-ray absorption spectroscopy studies of metal compounds in neurodegenerative brain tissue. J Phys Conf Ser. 2005;17:54–60. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Collingwood JF, Chong RKK, Kasama T, Cervera-Gontard L, Dunin-Borkowski RE, Perry G, Pósfai M, Siedlak SL, Simpson ET, Smith MA, Dobson J. Three-Dimensional Tomographic Imaging and Characterization of Iron Compounds within Alzheimer’s Plaque Core Material. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2008;14:235–245. doi: 10.3233/jad-2008-14211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jankowsky JL, Fadale DJ, Anderson J, Xu GM, Gonzales V, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Lee MK, Younkin LH, Wagner SL, Younkin SG, Borchelt DR. Mutant presenilins specifically elevate the levels of the 42 residue β-amyloid peptide in vivo: evidence for augmentation of a 42-specific secretase. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:159–170. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Leskovjan AC, Lanzirotti A, Miller LM. Amyloid plaques in PSAPP mice bind less metal than plaques in human Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage. 2009;47:1215–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chishti MA, Yang DS, Janus C, Phinney AL, Horne P, Pearson J, Strome R, Zuker N, Loukides J, French J, Turner S, Morissette C, Paquette J, Gervais F, Bergeron C, Fraser PE, Carlson GA, St George-Hyslop P, Westaway D. Early-onset amyloid deposition and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice expressing a double mutant form of amyloid precursor protein 695. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:21562–21570. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100710200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bellucci A, Luccarini I, Scali C, Prosperi C, Giovannini MG, Pepeu G, Casamenti F. Cholinergic dysfunction, neuronal damage and axonal loss in TgCRND8 mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2006;23:260–272. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rajendran R, Minqin R, Ynsa MD, Casadesus G, Smith MA, Perry G, Halliwell B, Watt F. A novel approach to the identification and quantitative elemental analysis of amyloid deposits – insights into the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;382:91–95. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.02.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hutchinson RW, Cox AG, McLeod CW, Marshall PS, Harper A, Dawson EL, Howlett DR. Imaging and spatial distribution of [beta]-amyloid peptide and metal ions in Alzheimer’s plaques by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 2005;346:225–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Berisha F, Feke GT, Trempe CL, McMeel JW, Schepens CL. Retinal abnormalities in early Alzheimer’s disease. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2007;48:2285–2289. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Koronyo-Hamaoui M, Koronyo Y, Ljubimov AV, Miller CA, Ko MHK, Black KL, Schwartz M, Farkas DL. Identification of amyloid plaques in retinas from Alzheimer’s patients and noninvasive 〈i〉 in vivo optical imaging of retinal plaques in a mouse model. NeuroImage. 2011;54:S204–S217. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Koronyo Y, Salumbides BC, Black KL, Koronyo-Hamaoui M. Alzheimer’s Disease in the Retina: Imaging Retinal Aβ Plaques for Early Diagnosis and Therapy Assessment. Neurodegener Dis. 2012;10:285–293. doi: 10.1159/000335154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Jefferson A, Wijesurendra RS, McAteer MA, Digby JE, Douglas G, Bannister T, Perez-Balderas F, Bagi Z, Lindsay AC, Choudhury RP. Molecular imaging with optical coherence tomography using ligand-conjugated microparticles that detect activated endothelial cells: Rational design through target quantification. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219:579–587. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.07.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ma Q, Li Y, Du J, Liu H, Kanazawa K, Nemoto T, Nakanishi H, Zhao Y. Copper binding properties of a tau peptide associated with Alzheimer’s disease studied by CD, NMR, and MALDI-TOF MS. Peptides. 2006;27:841–849. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2005.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Morawski M, Meinecke C, Reinert T, Dörffel AC, Riederer P, Arendt T, Butz T. Determination of trace elements in the human substantia nigra. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 2005;231:224–228. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ide-Ektessabi A, Rabionet M. The role of trace metallic elements in neurodegenerative disorders: Quantitative analysis using XRF and XANES spectroscopy. Anal Sci. 2005;21:885–892. doi: 10.2116/analsci.21.885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Duce JA, Bush AI. Biological metals and Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for therapeutics and diagnostics. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;92:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ma QF, Li YM, Du JT, Kanazawa K, Nemoto T, Nakanishi H, Zhao YF. Binding of copper (II) ion to an Alzheimer’s tau peptide as revealed by MALDI TOF MS, CD, and NMR. Biopolymers. 2005;79:74–85. doi: 10.1002/bip.20335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yamamoto A, Shin RW, Hasegawa K, Naiki H, Sato H, Yoshimasu F, Kitamoto T. Iron (III) induces aggregation of hyperphosphorylated tau and its reduction to iron (II) reverses the aggregation: implications in the formation of neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem. 2002;82:1137–1147. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.t01-1-01061.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Klatzo I, Wisniewski H, Streicher E. Experimental production of neurofibrillary degeneration: 1. Light microscopic observations. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1965;24:187–199. doi: 10.1097/00005072-196504000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Terry RD, Peña C. Experimental production of neurofibrillary degeneration: 2. Electron microscopy, phosphatase histochemistry and electron prose analysis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1965;24:200–210. doi: 10.1097/00005072-196504000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Perl DP, Brody AR. Alzheimer’s disease: X-ray spectrometric evidence of aluminum accumulation in neurofibrillary tangle-bearing neurons. Science. 1980;208:297–299. doi: 10.1126/science.7367858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Good PF, Perl DP, Bierer LM, Schmeidler J. Selective accumulation of aluminum and iron in the neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease: a laser microprobe (LAMMA) study. Ann Neurol. 1992;31:286–292. doi: 10.1002/ana.410310310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Edwardson JA, Klinowski J, Oakley AE, Perry RH, Candy JM. Aluminosilicates and the ageing brain: implications for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Tokutake S, Nagase H, Morisaki S, Oyanagi S. Aluminium detected in senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles is contained in lipofuscin granules with silicon, probably as aluminosilicate. Neurosci Lett. 1995;185:99–102. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)11234-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yumoto S, Kakimi S, Ohsaki A, Ishikawa A. Demonstration of aluminum in amyloid fibers in the cores of senile plaques in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Inorg Biochem. 2009;103:1579–1584. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Jacobs RW, Duong T, Jones RE, Trapp GA, Scheibel AB. A reexamination of aluminum in Alzheimer’s disease: analysis by energy dispersive X-ray microprobe and flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The Canadian journal of neurological sciences Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques. 1989;16:498–503. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100029838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Landsberg JP, McDonald B, Watt F. Absence of aluminium in neuritic plaque cores in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 1992;360:65–68. doi: 10.1038/360065a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Makjanic J, McDonald B, Li-Hsian Chen CP, Watt F. Absence of aluminium in neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 1998;240:123–126. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00940-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Makjanic J, McDonald B, Watt F. Nuclear microscopy study of neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 1997;130:439–443. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Shirabe T, Irie K, Uchida M. Autopsy case of aluminum encephalopathy. Neuropathology. 2002;22:206–210. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1789.2002.00432.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Perl DP, Moalem S. Aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease, a personal perspective after 25 years. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2006;9:291–300. doi: 10.3233/jad-2006-9s332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gupta VB, Anitha S, Hegde ML, Zecca L, Garruto RM, Ravid R, Shankar SK, Stein R, Shanmugavelu P, Jagannatha Rao KS. Aluminium in Alzheimer’s disease: are we still at a crossroad? Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62:143–158. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4317-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Banks WA, Banks AJ, Zatta P. The blood brain-barrier in aluminum toxicity and Alzheimer’s disease. World Scientific; Singapore: 1995. pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Danscher G, Jensen KB, Frederickson CJ, Kemp K, Andreasen A, Juhl S, Stoltenberg M, Ravid R. Increased amount of zinc in the hippocampus and amygdala of Alzheimer’s diseased brains: A proton-induced X-ray emission spectroscopic analysis of cryostat sections from autopsy material. J Neurosci Methods. 1997;76:53–59. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(97)00079-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Frederickson CJ, Koh JY, Bush AI. The neurobiology of zinc in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:449–462. doi: 10.1038/nrn1671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Bush AI, Pettingell WH, Multhaup G, Paradis Md, Vonsattel JP, Gusella JF, Beyreuther K, Masters CL, Tanzi RE. Rapid induction of Alzheimer A beta amyloid formation by zinc. Science. 1994;265:1464–1467. doi: 10.1126/science.8073293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hung YH, Bush AI, Cherny RA. Copper in the brain and Alzheimer’s disease. JBIC, J Biol Inorg Chem. 2010;15:61–76. doi: 10.1007/s00775-009-0600-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sensi SL, Paoletti P, Bush AI, Sekler I. Zinc in the physiology and pathology of the CNS. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:780–791. doi: 10.1038/nrn2734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mony L, Kew JNC, Gunthorpe MJ, Paoletti P. Allosteric modulators of NR2B containing NMDA receptors: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;157:1301–1317. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00304.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Connor JR, Snyder BS, Beard JL, Fine RE, Mufson EJ. Regional distribution of iron and iron regulatory proteins in the brain in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci Res. 1992;31:327–335. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490310214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Deibel MA, Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR. Copper, iron, and zinc imbalances in severely degenerated brain regions in Alzheimer’s disease: possible relation to oxidative stress. J Neurol Sci. 1996;143:137–142. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(96)00203-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bartzokis G, Sultzer D, Cummings J, Holt LE, Hance DB, Henderson VW, Mintz J. In vivo evaluation of brain iron in Alzheimer disease using magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:47–53. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Smith MA, Zhu X, Tabaton M, Liu G, McKeel, Cohen ML, Wang X, Siedlak SL, Dwyer BE, Hayashi T. Increased iron and free radical generation in preclinical Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2010;19:363–372. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang H, Wang M, Wang B, Li M, Chen H, Yu X, Zhao Y, Feng W, Chai Z. The distribution profile and oxidation states of biometals in APP transgenic mouse brain: dyshomeostasis with age and as a function of the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Metallomics. 2012;4:289–296. doi: 10.1039/c2mt00104g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Quintana C, Bellefqih S, Laval JY, Guerquin-Kern JL, Wu TD, Avila J, Ferrer I, Arranz R, Patiño C. Study of the localization of iron, ferritin, and hemosiderin in Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus by analytical microscopy at the subcellular level. J Struct Biol. 2006;153:42–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Leskovjan AC, Kretlow A, Miller LM. Fourier Transform Infrared Imaging Showing Reduced Unsaturated Lipid Content in the Hippocampus of a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Anal Chem. 2010;82:2711–2716. doi: 10.1021/ac1002728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Rogers JT, Randall JD, Cahill CM, Eder PS, Huang X, Gunshin H, Leiter L, McPhee J, Sarang SS, Utsuki T, Greig NH, Lahiri DK, Tanzi RE, Bush AI, Giordano T, Gullans SR. An iron-responsive element type II in the 5′-untranslated region of the Alzheimer’s amyloid precursor protein transcript. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:45518–45528. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207435200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Silvestri L, Camaschella C. A potential pathogenetic role of iron in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:1548–1550. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00356.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Altamura S, Muckenthaler MU. Iron toxicity in diseases of aging: Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and atherosclerosis. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2009;16:879–895. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2009-1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Price JL, Morris JC. Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and “preclinical” Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:358–368. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199903)45:3<358::aid-ana12>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Peles DN, Simon JD. Challenges in Applying Photoemission Electron Microscopy to Biological Systems. Photochem Photobiol. 2009;85:8–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00484.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wright JA, Brown DR. Alpha synuclein and its role in metal binding: Relevance to Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci Res. 2008;86:496–503. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Rodnitzky RL. Upcoming treatments in Parkinson’s disease, including gene therapy. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2012;18(Suppl 1):S37–S40. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(11)70014-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Rasia RM, Bertoncini CW, Marsh D, Hoyer W, Cherny D, Zweckstetter M, Griesinger C, Jovin TM, Fernández CO. Structural characterization of copper (II) binding to α-synuclein: Insights into the bioinorganic chemistry of Parkinson’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:4294–4299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407881102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Uversky VN, Li J, Fink AL. Pesticides directly accelerate the rate of alpha-synuclein fibril formation: a possible factor in Parkinson’s disease. FEBS Lett. 2001;500:105–108. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02597-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Double KL, Gerlach M, Schünemann V, Trautwein AX, Zecca L, Gallorini M, Youdim MBH, Riederer P, Ben-Shachar D. Iron-binding characteristics of neuromelanin of the human substantia nigra. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;66:489–494. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(03)00293-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Carmona A, Devès G, Roudeau S, Cloetens P, Bohic S, Ortega R. Manganese Accumulates within Golgi Apparatus in Dopaminergic Cells as Revealed by Synchrotron X-ray Fluorescence Nanoimaging. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2010;1:194–203. doi: 10.1021/cn900021z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Szczerbowska Boruchowska M, Lankosz M, Ostachowicz J, Adamek D, Krygowska Wajs A, Tomik B, Szczudlik A, Simionovici A, Bohic S. Topographic and quantitative microanalysis of human central nervous system tissue using synchrotron radiation. X-Ray Spectrom. 2004;33:3–11. [Google Scholar]
- 106.Gh Popescu BF, George MJ, Bergmann U, Garachtchenko AV, Kelly ME, McCrea RPE, Lüning K, Devon RM, George GN, Hanson AD. Mapping metals in Parkinson’s and normal brain using rapid-scanning X-ray fluorescence. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:651–663. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/3/012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Oakley AE, Collingwood JF, Dobson J, Love G, Perrott HR, Edwardson JA, Elstner M, Morris CM. Individual dopaminergic neurons show raised iron levels in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2007;68:1820–1820. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000262033.01945.9a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Chwiej J, Adamek D, Szczerbowska-Boruchowska M, Krygowska-Wajs A, Wojcik S, Falkenberg G, Manka A, Lankosz M. Investigations of differences in iron oxidation state inside single neurons from substantia nigra of Parkinson’s disease and control patients using the micro-XANES technique. JBIC, J Biol Inorg Chem. 2007;12:204–211. doi: 10.1007/s00775-006-0179-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Chwiej J, Adamek D, Szczerbowska-Boruchowska M, Krygowska-Wajs A, Bohic S, Lankosz M. Study of Cu chemical state inside single neurons from Parkinson’s disease and control substantia nigra using the micro-XANES technique. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2008;22:183–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2008.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Berg D, Gerlach M, Youdim MBH, Double KL, Zecca L, Riederer P, Becker G. Brain iron pathways and their relevance to Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem. 2001;79:225–236. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00608.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Lee DW, Andersen JK. Iron elevations in the aging Parkinsonian brain: a consequence of impaired iron homeostasis? J Neurochem. 2010;112:332–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06470.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Salazar J, Mena N, Hunot S, Prigent A, Alvarez-Fischer D, Arredondo M, Duyckaerts C, Sazdovitch V, Zhao L, Garrick LM, Nuñez MT, Garrick MD, Raisman-Vozari R, Hirsch EC. Divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) contributes to neurodegeneration in animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18578–18583. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804373105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Mastroberardino PG, Hoffman EK, Horowitz MP, Betarbet R, Taylor G, Cheng D, Na HM, Gutekunst CA, Gearing M, Trojanowski JQ. A novel transferrin/TfR2- mediated mitochondrial iron transport system is disrupted in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2009;34:417–431. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Bartzokis G, Tishler TA, Shin ILS, Lu POH, Cummings JL. Brain ferritin iron as a risk factor for age at onset in neurodegenerative diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1012:224–236. doi: 10.1196/annals.1306.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Dedmon MM, Lindorff-Larsen K, Christodoulou J, Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM. Mapping long-range interactions in α-synuclein using spin-label NMR and ensemble molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:476–477. doi: 10.1021/ja044834j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Bertoncini CW, Jung YS, Fernandez CO, Hoyer W, Griesinger C, Jovin TM, Zweckstetter M. Release of long-range tertiary interactions potentiates aggregation of natively unstructured α-synuclein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:1430–1435. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407146102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Davidson WS, Jonas A, Clayton DF, George JM. Stabilization of -synuclein secondary structure upon binding to synthetic membranes. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:9443–9449. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Weinreb PH, Zhen W, Poon AW, Conway KA, Lansbury PT., Jr NACP, a protein implicated in Alzheimer’s disease and learning, is natively unfolded. Biochemistry. 1996;35:13709–13715. doi: 10.1021/bi961799n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Rivera-Mancía S, Pérez-Neri I, Ríos C, Tristán-López L, Rivera-Espinosa L, Montes S. The transition metals copper and iron in neurodegenerative diseases. Chem-Biol Interact. 2010;186:184–199. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2010.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Ben Shachar D, Riederer P, Youdim MBH. Iron Melanin Interaction and Lipid Peroxidation: Implications for Parkinson’s Disease. J Neurochem. 1991;57:1609–1614. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb06358.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Zecca L, Gallorini M, Schünemann V, Trautwein AX, Gerlach M, Riederer P, Vezzoni P, Tampellini D. Iron, neuromelanin and ferritin content in the substantia nigra of normal subjects at different ages: consequences for iron storage and neurodegenerative processes. J Neurochem. 2001;76:1766–1773. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Charkoudian LK, Franz KJ. Fe(III)-Coordination Properties of Neuromelanin Components: 5,6-Dihydroxyindole and 5,6-Dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic Acid. Inorg Chem. 2006;45:3657–3664. doi: 10.1021/ic060014r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Reinert T, Fiedler A, Morawski M, Arendt T. High resolution quantitative element mapping of neuromelanin-containingneurons. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 2007;260:227–230. [Google Scholar]
- 124.Ide-Ektessabi A, Fujisawa S, Yoshida S. Chemical state imaging of iron in nerve cells from a patient with Parkinsonism-dementia complex. J Appl Phys. 2002;91:1613–1619. [Google Scholar]
- 125.Aime S, Bergamasco B, Biglino D, Digilio G, Fasano M, Giamello E, Lopiano L. EPR investigations of the iron domain in neuromelanin. Biochim Biophys Acta, Mol Basis Dis. 1997;1361:49–58. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(97)00014-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Yoshida S, Ektessabi A, Fujisawa S. XAFS spectroscopy of a single neuron from a patient with Parkinson’s disease. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2001;8:998–1000. doi: 10.1107/s0909049500017726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Zecca L, Casella L, Albertini A, Bellei C, Zucca FA, Engelen M, Zadlo A, Szewczyk G, Zareba M, Sarna T. Neuromelanin can protect against iron mediated oxidative damage in system modeling iron overload of brain aging and Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2008;106:1866–1875. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Youdim MB, Ben-Shachar D, Riederer P. The enigma of neuromelanin in Parkinson’s disease substantia nigra. Journal of neural transmission Supplementum. 1994;43:113–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Matusch A, Depboylu C, Palm C, Wu B, Hoglinger GU, Schafer MKH, Becker JS. Cerebral bioimaging of Cu, Fe, Zn, and Mn in the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson’s disease using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2010;21:161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Ren MQ, Xie JP, Wang XS, Ong WY, Leong SK, Watt F. Iron concentrations and distributions in the parkinsonian substantia nigra of aged and young primate models. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 2001;181:522–528. [Google Scholar]
- 131.Schober A. Classic toxin-induced animal models of Parkinson’s disease: 6-OHDA and MPTP. Cell Tissue Res. 2004;318:215–224. doi: 10.1007/s00441-004-0938-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Ide-Ektessabi A, Kawakami T, Watt F. Distribution and chemical state analysis of iron in the Parkinsonian substantia nigra using synchrotron radiation micro beams. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 2004;213:590–594. [Google Scholar]
- 133.Betarbet R, Sherer TB, Greenamyre JT. Animal models of Parkinson’s disease. BioEssays. 2002;24:308–318. doi: 10.1002/bies.10067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Morello M, Canini A, Mattioli P, Sorge RP, Alimonti A, Bocca B, Forte G, Martorana A, Bernardi G, Sancesario G. Sub-cellular localization of manganese in the basal ganglia of normal and manganese-treated rats: An electron spectroscopy imaging and electron energy-loss spectroscopy study. NeuroToxicology. 2008;29:60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Wedler FC, Denman RB. Glutamine synthetase: the major Mn (II) enzyme in mammalian brain. Current topics in Cellular Regulation. 1984;24:153–169. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-152824-9.50021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Erikson KM, Dorman DC, Lash LH, Aschner M. Manganese Inhalation by Rhesus Monkeys is Associated with Brain Regional Changes in Biomarkers of Neurotoxicity. Toxicol Sci. 2007;97:459–466. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Zhang P, Land W, Lee S, Juliani J, Lefman J, Smith SR, Germain D, Kessel M, Leapman R, Rouault TA. Electron tomography of degenerating neurons in mice with abnormal regulation of iron metabolism. J Struct Biol. 2005;150:144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Carmona A, Devès G, Ortega R. Quantitative microanalysis of metal ions in subcellular compartments of cultured dopaminergic cells by combination of three ion beam techniques. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;390:1585–1594. doi: 10.1007/s00216-008-1866-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Gitler AD, Chesi A, Geddie ML, Strathearn KE, Hamamichi S, Hill KJ, Caldwell KA, Caldwell GA, Cooper AA, Rochet JC. α-Synuclein is part of a diverse and highly conserved interaction network that includes PARK9 and manganese toxicity. Nat Genet. 2009;41:308–315. doi: 10.1038/ng.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Higashi Y, Asanuma M, Miyazaki I, Hattori N, Mizuno Y, Ogawa N. Parkin attenuates manganese-induced dopaminergic cell death. J Neurochem. 2004;89:1490–1497. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02445.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Carmona A, Cloetens P, Devès G, Bohic S, Ortega R. Nano-imaging of trace metals by synchrotron X-ray fluorescence into dopaminergic single cells and neurite-like processes. J Anal At Spectrom. 2008;23:1083–1088. [Google Scholar]
- 142.Ortega R, Cloetens P, Devès G, Carmona A, Bohic S. Iron storage within dopamine neurovesicles revealed by chemical nano-imaging. PLoS One. 2007;2:e925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Lotharius J, Brundin P. Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease: dopamine, vesicles and alpha-synuclein. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:932–942. doi: 10.1038/nrn983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Valentine JS, Doucette PA, Zittin PS. Copper-zinc superoxide dismutase and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:563–593. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Bäumer D, Hilton D, Paine SML, Turner MR, Lowe J, Talbot K, Ansorge O. Juvenile ALS with basophilic inclusions is a FUS proteinopathy with FUS mutations. Neurology. 2010;75:611–618. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ed9cde. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Tanaka Y, Yoshikura N, Harada N, Yamada M, Koumura A, Sakurai T, Hayashi Y, Kimura A, Hozumi I, Inuzuka T. Late-onset Patients with Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Japan have a Higher Progression Rate of ALSFRS-R at the Time of Diagnosis. Intern Med. 2012;51:579–584. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.51.6148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Wang L, Gutmann DH, Roos RP. Astrocyte loss of mutant SOD1 delays ALS disease onset and progression in G85R transgenic mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:286–293. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Lelie HL, Liba A, Bourassa MW, Chattopadhyay M, Chan PK, Gralla EB, Miller LM, Borchelt DR, Valentine JS, White legge JP. Copper and Zinc Metallation Status of Copper-Zinc Superoxide Dismutase from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Transgenic Mice. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:2795–2806. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.186999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Shaw CE, Al-Chalabi A, Leigh N. Progress in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2001;1:69–76. doi: 10.1007/s11910-001-0078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Sutedja NA, Veldink JH, Fischer K, Kromhout H, Heederik D, Huisman MHB, Wokke JHJ, van den Berg LH. Exposure to chemicals and metals and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review. Amyotrophic Lateral Scler. 2009;10:302–309. doi: 10.3109/17482960802455416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Tomik B, Chwiej J, Szczerbowska-Boruchowska M, Lankosz M, Wójcik S, Adamek D, Falkenberg G, Bohic S, Simionovici A, Stegowski Z, Szczudlik A. Implementation of X-ray Fluorescence Microscopy for Investigation of Elemental Abnormalities in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Neurochem Res. 2006;31:321–331. doi: 10.1007/s11064-005-9030-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Weiss JH, Sensi SL, Koh JY. Zn2+: a novel ionic mediator of neural injury in brain disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2000;21:395–401. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(00)01541-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Smith AP, Lee NM. Role of zinc in ALS. Amyotrophic Lateral Scler. 2007;8:131–143. doi: 10.1080/17482960701249241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Kastyak MZ, Szczerbowska-Boruchowska M, Adamek D, Tomik B, Lankosz M, Gough KM. Pigmented creatine deposits in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosiscentral nervous system tissues identified by synchrotron Fourier Transform Infrared microspectroscopy and X-ray fluorescence spectromicroscopy. Neuroscience. 2010;166:1119–1128. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Pastula DM, Moore DH, Bedlack RS. Creatine for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 2010:CD005225–CD005225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005225.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Miura T, Hori-i A, Takeuchi H. Metal-dependent [alpha]-helix formation promoted by the glycine-rich octapeptide region of prion protein. FEBS Lett. 1996;396:248–252. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)01104-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Brown DR, Qin K, Herms JW, Madlung A, Manson J, Strome R, Fraser PE, Kruck T, Von Bohlen A, Schulz-Schaeffer W. The cellular prion protein binds. Nature. 1997;390:684–687. doi: 10.1038/37783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Aronoff-Spencer E, Burns CS, Avdievich NI, Gerfen GJ, Peisach J, Antholine WE, Ball HL, Cohen FE, Prusiner SB, Millhauser GL. Identification of the Cu2+ binding sites in the N-terminal domain of the prion protein by EPR and CD spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 2000;39:13760–13771. doi: 10.1021/bi001472t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Burns CS, Aronoff-Spencer E, Dunham CM, Lario P, Avdievich NI, Antholine WE, Olmstead MM, Vrielink A, Gerfen GJ, Peisach J. Molecular features of the copper binding sites in the octarepeat domain of the prion protein. Biochemistry. 2002;41:3991–4001. doi: 10.1021/bi011922x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Pushie MJ, Pickering IJ, Martin GR, Tsutsui S, Jirik FR, George GN. Prion protein expression level alters regional copper, iron and zinc content in the mouse brain. Metallomics. 2011;3:206–214. doi: 10.1039/c0mt00037j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Westergard L, Christensen HM, Harris DA. The celular prion protein (PrPc): Its physiological function and role in disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) 2007;1772:629–644. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2007.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Bounhar Y, Zhang Y, Goodyer CG, LeBlanc A. Prion protein protects human neurons against Bax-mediated apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:39145–39149. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100443200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Roucou X, Guo Q, Zhang Y, Goodyer CG, LeBlanc AC. Cytosolic prion protein is not toxic and protects against Bax-mediated cell death in human primary neurons. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:40877–40881. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M306177200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Brown DR, Schulz-Schaeffer WJ, Schmidt B, Kretzschmar HA. Prion protein-deficient cells show altered response to oxidative stress due to decreased SOD-1 activity. Exp Neurol. 1997;146:104–112. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1997.6505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Brown DR, Nicholas RSJ, Canevari L. Lack of prion protein expression results in a neuronal phenotype sensitive to stress. J Neurosci Res. 2002;67:211–224. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.(a) Weise J, Sandau R, Schwarting S, Crome O, Wrede A, Schulz-Schaeffer W, Zerr I, Bähr M. Deletion of cellular prion protein results in reduced Akt activation, enhanced post-ischemic caspase-3 activation, and exacerbation of ischemic brain injury. Stroke. 2006;37:1296–1300. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000217262.03192.d4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Vassallo N, Herms J, Behrens C, Krebs B, Saeki K, Onodera T, Windl O, Kretzschmar HA. Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by cellular prion protein and its role in cell survival. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;332:75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.04.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Santuccione A, Sytnyk V, Leshchyns’ka I, Schachner M. Prion protein recruits its neuronal receptor NCAM to lipid rafts to activate p59fyn and to enhance neurite outgrowth. J Cell Biol. 2005;169:341–354. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200409127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Kanaani J, Prusiner SB, Diacovo J, Baekkeskov S, Legname G. Recombinant prion protein induces rapid polarization and development of synapses in embryonic rat hippocampal neurons in vitro. J Neurochem. 2005;95:1373–1386. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03469.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Chen S, Mangé A, Dong L, Lehmann S, Schachner M. Prion protein as trans-interacting partner for neurons is involved in neurite outgrowth and neuronal survival. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2003;22:227–233. doi: 10.1016/s1044-7431(02)00014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Davies P, Brown D. The chemistry of copper binding to PrP: is there sufficient evidence to elucidate a role for copper in protein function? Biochem J. 2008;410:237–244. doi: 10.1042/BJ20071477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Shearer J, Rosenkoetter KE, Callan PE, Pham C. One Octarepeate Expansion to the Human Prion Protein Alters Both the Zn2+ and Cu2+ Coordination Environments within the Octarepeate Domain. Inorg Chem. 2011;50:1173–1175. doi: 10.1021/ic102294u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Shiraishi N, Inai Y, Hirano Y, Ihara Y. Calreticulin Inhibits Prion Protein PrP-(23–98) Aggregation in Vitro. Biosci, Biotechnol, Biochem. 2011;75:1625–1627. doi: 10.1271/bbb.110287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Helpern J, Jensen J, Lee SP, Falangola M. Quantitative MRI assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. J Mol Neurosci. 2004;24:45–48. doi: 10.1385/JMN:24:1:045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Schenck JF, Zimmerman EA. High-field magnetic resonance imaging of brain iron: birth of a biomarker? NMR Biomed. 2004;17:433–445. doi: 10.1002/nbm.922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Martin WR, Wieler M, Gee M. Midbrain iron content in early Parkinson disease: a potential biomarker of disease status. Neurology. 2008;70:1411–1417. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000286384.31050.b5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Stankiewicz J, Panter SS, Neema M, Arora A, Batt CE, Bakshi R. Iron in Chronic Brain Disorders: Imaging and Neurotherapeutic Implications. Neurotherapeutics. 2007;4:371–386. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Bartzokis G, Sultzer D, Mintz J, Holt LE, Marx P, Phelan CK, Marder SR. In vivo evaluation of brain iron in Alzheimer’s disease and normal subjects using MRI. Biol Psychiatry. 1994;35:480–487. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)90047-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Bartzokis G, Tishler TA. MRI evaluation of basal ganglia ferritin iron and neurotoxicity in Alzheimer’s and Huntingon’s disease. Cellular and molecular biology (Noisy-le-Grand, France) 2000;46:821–833. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.House MJ, St Pierre TG, Foster JK, Martins RN, Clarnette R. Quantitative MR imaging R2 relaxometry in elderly participants reporting memory loss. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2006;27:430–439. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Brass SD, Chen N, Mulkern RV, Bakshi R. Magnetic resonance imaging of iron deposition in neurological disorders. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;17:31–31. doi: 10.1097/01.rmr.0000245459.82782.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Atasoy H, Nuyan O, Tunc T, Yorubulut M, Unal AE, Inan LE. T2-weighted MRI in Parkinson’s disease; substantia nigra pars compacta hypointensity correlates with the clinical scores. Neurology India. 2004;52:332–337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Gorell JM, Ordidge RJ, Brown GG, Deniau JC, Buderer NM, Helpern JA. Increased iron related MRI contrast in the substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 1995;45:1138–1143. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.6.1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Zhang J, Zhang Y, Wang J, Cai P, Luo C, Qian Z, Dai Y, Feng H. Characterizing iron deposition in Parkinson’s disease using susceptibility-weighted imaging: An in vivo MR study. Brain Res. 2010;1330:124–130. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Berti V, Osorio RS, Mosconi L, Li Y, De Santi S, De Leon MJ. Early detection of Alzheimer’s disease with PET imaging. Neurodegener Dis. 2010;7:131–135. doi: 10.1159/000289222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Pavese N, Brooks DJ. Imaging neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta, Mol Basis Dis. 2009;1792:722–729. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Shen LH, Tseng YC, Liao MH, Fu YK. The role of molecular imaging in the diagnosis and management of neuropsychiatric disorders. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2011/439397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Tzen KY, Lu CS, Yen TC, Wey SP, Ting G. Differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and vascular parkinsonism by 99mTc-TRODAT-1. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2001;42:408–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Ikawa M, Okazawa H, Kudo T, Kuriyama M, Fujibayashi Y, Yoneda M. Evaluation of striatal oxidative stress in patients with Parkinson’s disease using [62Cu] ATSM PET. Nucl Med Biol. 2011;38:945–951. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, Wang Y, Blomqvist G, Holt DP, Bergström M, Savitcheva I, Huang GF, Estrada S. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:306–319. doi: 10.1002/ana.20009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Mathis CA, Lopresti BJ, Klunk WE. Impact of amyloid imaging on drug development in Alzheimer’s disease. Nucl Med Biol. 2007;34:809–822. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Mintun MA, Larossa GN, Sheline YI, Dence CS, Lee SY, Mach RH, Klunk WE, Mathis CA, DeKosky ST, Morris JC. [11C] PIB in a nondemented population Potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2006;67:446–452. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000228230.26044.a4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Fodero-Tavoletti MT, Villemagne VL, Paterson BM, White AR, Li QX, Camakaris J, O’Keefe G, Cappai R, Barnham KJ, Donnelly PS. Bis (thiosemicarbazonato) Cu-64 complexes for positron emission tomography imaging of Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2010;20:49–55. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Hirayama T, Van de Bittner GC, Gray LW, Lutsenko S, Chang CJ. Near-infrared fluorescent sensor for in vivo copper imaging in a murine Wilson disease model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:2228–2233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113729109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


