Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2011 Nov 4;415(1):16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.10.044

YhiQ is RsmJ, the methyltransferase responsible for methylation of G1516 in 16S rRNA of E. coli

Georgeta N Basturea 1, Darryl R Dague 1, Murray P Deutscher 1, Kenneth E Rudd 1
PMCID: PMC4140241  NIHMSID: NIHMS336759  PMID: 22079366

Abstract

Ten methyltransferases and one pseudouridine synthase are required for complete modification of the small ribosomal subunit in E. coli. Nine methyltransferases, as well as the pseudouridine synthase, are already known. Here we identify RsmJ, the last unknown methyltransferase required for methylation of m2G1516 in 16S rRNA, as the protein encoded by yhiQ. Reverse transcription primer extension analysis reveals that rRNA extracted from a yhiQ deletion strain is not methylated at G1516. Moreover, methylation is restored upon gene complementation. Also, purified recombinant YhiQ specifically methylates 30S subunits extracted from the deletion strain. The absence of the yhiQ gene leads to a cold sensitive phenotype. Based on these data we propose that the yhiQ gene be renamed rsmJ.

Keywords: E. coli, methyltransferase, RNA modification, small ribosomal subunit


One of the most functionally complex molecules in living organisms is RNA, which consists of a long chain of canonical nucleotides of adenine, cytosine, guanine and uracil. However, the set of four does not account for the complexity of RNAs, which is increased by the presence of modified nucleotides. RNA modification involves chemical alterations of bases and/or ribose moieties. Currently, more than 120 different types of base modifications are known, most of which are present in stable cellular RNAs such as tRNAs, rRNAs and small nuclear and nucleolar RNAs (snRNAs, and snoRNAs).1,2 Of the stable RNA molecules, ribosomal RNA, the most abundant in any cell, contains three main types of nucleotide modification: pseudouridines (Ψ), 2′-hydroxyl ribose methylation (Nm), and base methylation (mN).3

In bacteria, the number of base methylated nucleotides generally exceeds those of ribose methylations and pseudouridines.4,5,6,7 Regardless of their type and number, modified nucleotides are distributed in important functional, highly conserved regions of the rRNA in all organisms, such as the peptidyl-transferase center, inter-subunit bridges, tRNA binding sites, the decoding region, and the mRNA binding area.3,8,9,10

Information regarding the chemical identities and sequence location of modified nucleotides in prokaryotes is limited. Most of the data come from studies of E. coli,2,11 H. marismortui,12 D. radiodurans, 2,12 and T. thermophilus 6,7. From the available data, it is clear that bacterial rRNA contains fewer modified nucleotides than are present in eukaryotes, and most methyl groups are attached to bases, rather than to ribose. Also, the modification process itself is performed by site-specific enzymes,11 and there is no evidence of guide RNA involvement, as is the case in eukaryotes.

E. coli ribosomal RNA contains 36 modified nucleotides that include 11 pseudouridines, 24 methylated residues, one dihydrouridine2 and one recently identified hydroxycytidine11 (Table 1.). Twenty-eight modifying enzymes, responsible for modification at 31 residues have been identified so far (Table 1): 7 pseudouridine synthases and 21 methyltransferases. Each enzyme is site specific, with three exceptions: two pseudouridine synthases, RluC and RluD, which modify three different sites in rRNA, and RsmA(KsgA), a methyltransferase, which double-methylates two adjacent m62A residues. Also, each residue is modified by just one enzyme, except for the double- methylated C1402 in 16S rRNA and the methylated pseudouridine at position 1915 in 23S rRNA.

Table 1.

Modified nucleotides of E. coli 16S rRNA and their modifying enzymes.

Nucleotide Modification Gene Synonym Reference
516 Ψ RsuA YejD 29
527 m7G RsmG GidB 30
966 m2G RsmD YhhF 31
967 m5C RsmB Fmu, YhdB 32,33
1207 m2G RsmC YjjT 34
1402 m4Cm RsmH, RsmI YabC, YraL 38
1407 m5C RsmF YebU 36
1498 m3U RsmE YggJ 14
1516 m2G RsmJ YhiQ This study
1518 m62A RsmA KsgA 15,28
1519 m62A RsmA KsgA 15,28

In this study, we show that the protein encoded by rsmJ, previously named yhiQ, is responsible for methylation at G1516 in 16S rRNA. The gene was identified by analysis of putative methyltransferase deletion strains and was confirmed by gene complementation, cloning and overexpression, and in vitro characterization of the purified recombinant protein. By identifying yhiQ as the gene coding for RsmJ, we have identified the last unknown enzyme responsible for 16S rRNA modification in E. coli. Only two methyltransferases, one dihydrouridine synthase and one hydroxylase responsible for modification of A2030, G2069, U2449 and C2501, all in 23S rRNA, still remain to be found (Table 1).

Deletion of yhiQ gene is associated with lack of methylation at G1516 in 16S rRNA

Seven open reading frames yhiQ, smtA, yafS, yfiF, yafE, yfmD and yjtD, predicted to be S-adenosyl-L-methionine dependent methyltransferases, were considered as candidates for the enzyme catalyzing m2G methylation at nucleotide 1516 in 16S rRNA of E. coli. To test this prediction, total RNA was extracted from E. coli deletion strains lacking one of these genes, constructed as described in “Materials and Methods” each, and analyzed.13 However, reverse transcriptase primer extension analysis 14 with a primer specific to nucleotides 1523–1542 in 16S rRNA, initially revealed no conclusive difference in rRNA modification at its 3′ end between wild type and these deletion strains. Strong stops in the RT extension reaction were seen due to methylation at the RsmA specific sites15 A1518 and A1519 in all strains, including the isogenic wild type. A much weaker stop was also observed at site 1517 as a result of G1516 methylation in all strains, and was barely detectable in the yhiQ deletion (data not shown). Based on this initial data, we reasoned that the weak stop at 1517 might be caused by the inability of the RT to bypass the highly methylated bases A1518 and A1519 (Fig. 1), making it difficult to determine whether the absence of a stop in the yhiQ deletion was real. In order to allow extension past nucleotides 1518 and 1519, and to allow better analysis of the methylation state of G1516, we reexamined RNA isolated from a strain lacking both RsmA and YhiQ using the same RT-primer extension method. As shown in Figure 2, a strong stop was now revealed at nucleotide 1517 in the absence of RsmA (lane 1), while no stop in the extension reaction was obtained in the double mutant (lane 2), indicating that rRNA in this strain lacks the methyl group at position G1516.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Secondary structure of the small ribosomal subunit. Enlarged insert diagram depicts the structure of the 3′ minor domain (helixes 44 and 45) and their methylated sites. Residues modified by RsmA, as well as nucleotide G1516 are indicated by arrows. The primer used for reverse transcription reaction spans nucleotides 1523–1542.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Reverse transcriptase primer extension analysis of RNA. Total RNA was annealed to a [32-P]-labeled primer complementary to residues 1523–1542 in 16S rRNA prior to extension by AMV-RT according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Primer extension products were precipitated with ethanol, dissolved in DNA loading buffer containing 89% formamide, 4% TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1mM EDTA), 0.12% bromophenol blue and 0.17% xylene cyanol, separated on 8% polyacrylamide/7M urea sequencing gels and visualized by exposure to a PhosphorImager screen (Molecular Dynamics). The arrow indicates position G1517 at which the reverse transcriptase stops when G1516 is methylated.

Methyl group at G1516 is recovered by gene complementation

To confirm that yhiQ is the gene responsible for methylation at G1516, we performed gene complementation. Plasmids pCA24N-lacZ and pCA24N-yhiQ encoding His-tagged proteins under the control of an IPTG-inducible promoter were transformed into the double mutant strain.16 Cells were grown to exponential phase in either the presence or absence of IPTG, and tested for G1516 methylation. Figure 2 shows that G1516 is methylated when the mutant strain is transformed with the plasmid containing yhiQ (lanes 4 and 5), but there is no stop at G1517 with RNA extracted from cells transformed with the control plasmid (lane 3). These data indicate that yhiQ is required for methylation at G1516 in 16S rRNA. Methylation at G1516 in cells harboring pCA24N-yhiQ was recovered even in the absence of IPTG (lane 4), and this is due to the leakiness of the inducible lac promoter. Apparently, only a low level of YhiQ expression is sufficient for complementation as its overexpression (lane 5) does not intensify the stop at G1517.

Purified protein encoded by yhiQ has m2G1516 specific methyltransferase activity

To examine the activity of the yhiQ gene product in vitro, the gene was subcloned into pET28a such that an N-terminal His-tag fusion protein could be overexpressed. Induction of protein expression by IPTG led to a protein product of ~29 kDa, as expected from the DNA sequence. The protein was purified to homogeneity by metal affinity, ion exchange and size exclusion chromatography as described in “Materials and Methods” (Fig. 3), and was assayed for methyltransferase activity. The enzyme was able to incorporate [3H]-methyl groups from [3H]-SAM into 30S particles purified from the yhiQ deletion strain, but not into 30S particles extracted from wild type cells (Fig. 4). No more than 0.4 pmol methyl group was incorporated per pmol of mutant 30S subunit, even at high enzyme concentrations, suggesting that the modification is site specific and that not all the substrate 30S particles may be active. Additionally, we do not exclude the possibility that some endogenous SAM might be present in the enzyme preparation, reducing the specific activity of the [3H]-SAM and the apparent level of methyl group incorporation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

SDS-PAGE gel analysis of recombinant methyltransferase. Protein was overexpressed in BL21(DE3) cells transformed with pET28a-yhiQ containing the yhiQ gene insert fused with an N-terminal His-tag coding region. Purification was performed as described in “Supplemental material”. The gel was overloaded with 9 μg of purified His-YhiQ (Lane 2) next to molecular weight standards (Lane 1).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

In vitro methylation of wild type and mutant 30S particles. Reaction mixtures (100 μl) contained 20 mM HEPES (pH 7), 100 mM NH4Cl, 5 mM DTT, 200 μM SAM (S-adenosine-l-methionine, Sigma), 0.5 μCi [H3]-SAM (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), 2 mM Mg(OAc)2, 100 pmole 30S subunits or 16S rRNA, and 2.7 μg His-YhiQ. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 20 min at 37°C and the reaction terminated by vortexing in an equal volume of phenol. Seventy μl of the aqueous layer was removed after centrifugation and precipitated at room temperature using pellet paint (EMD chemicals), as indicated by the manufacturer. RNA pellets were resuspended in water, and radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting.

No methyl incorporation was detected when free 16S rRNA was used as substrate, suggesting either an altered 16S rRNA structure that requires the presence of ribosomal proteins or that one or more ribosomal proteins are directly required for the methylation reaction to proceed. These findings are in agreement with the suggestion of Siibak and Remme that modification at this site takes place during a late intermediate or late step during ribosome assembly.17

YhiQ belongs to the DUF548/UPF0341 subfamily of proteins of unknown function (pfam04445; E=2e-145), conferring a specific founder enzymatic function for this subfamily. It is also predicted to belong to a superfamily of SAM-dependent methytransferases (cd02440; E=1e-04).18 Although there are no significant paralogs of YhiQ found using blastp, there are 13 proteins in E. coli K-12, including YhiQ, that match the COG0500 family profile.19 Only one other COG0500 protein is known to be an rRNA methyltransferase (RlmA), but two are tRNA methyltransferases (CmoAB). The only other enzymatically characterized COG0500 member is BioC, a small molecule (malonyl-CoA) methyltransferase, identifying COG0500 as a family of diverse methyltransferases. Crystal structures of YhiQ proteins from E. coli (PDB entry 2PGX), S. flexneri (PDB entry 2OYR), S. typhimurium (PDB entry 2PKW), and N. gonorroeae (PDB entry 2R6Z) have been solved20,21,22,23. The structures reveal monomeric proteins except the N. gonorroeae protein that crystallized as a homodimer. The structure of YhiQ from S. flexneri was determined as a complex with S-adenosyl-L-homocyteine confirming its SAM binding ability.23

Effect of yhiQ deletion on cell physiology

yhiQ and prlC(opdA) form a two gene, RpoH-regulated, heat-shock operon in Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli.24,25 The dtpB(yhiP) gene is downstream of, and convergent upon the prlC-yhiQ operon, separated by 48 bp of intergenic DNA containing a predicted bidirectional terminator (−ΔG = 17.7 kcal/mole) in E. coli and a pair of REP sequences in Salmonella.

Deletion of the yhiQ gene leads to the absence of both the gene product and the methyl group at G1516. To determine if there is any physiological effect caused by this loss, we examined growth rates of wild type, yhiQ::kan mutant and yhiQ::kan ΔrsmA double mutant strains. No significant differences in cell growth were observed when cells were grown in either LB or M9 glucose media at 22°C, 30°C or 37°C (data not shown) similarly to Salmonella yhiQ mutants.24 We also found no competitive growth disadvantage of an yhiQ mutant at 30°C and 37°C in either an rsmA+ or an rsmA::kan background (data not shown). However, a markedly cold sensitivity phenotype at 16°C was noticed for yhiQ and rsmA deletion strains on plates (data not shown), in agreement with a recent high-throughput phenotyping study that found the growth rate of an E. coli yhiQ mutant to be significantly slower than an isogenic yhiQ+ strain only at 16°C, 18°C, and 20°C.26

We determined the growth rate of the yhiQ::kan mutant at 16°C and showed that it is 88% of the growth rate of an isogenic yhiQ+ strain. Despite the growth defect, we observed no change in the ribosome profile of mutant cells grown at 16°C (data not shown). A normal growth phenotype was restored by gene complementation using mutant yhiQ::kan cells transformed with pCA24N-yhiQ(GFP-).

E. coli becomes resistant to kasugamycin when methyl groups at A1518 and A1519 are missing due to a mutation in rsmA, formerly known as ksgA.27,28 Given the proximity of G1516, we wanted to assess whether modification of this site affects kasugamycin sensitivity or resistance. Thus, we measured growth rates of wild type, ΔyhiQ, ΔrsmA and double mutant ΔrsmA ΔyhiQ strains at 37°C in LB containing various concentrations of kasugamycin in 96-well microtiter plates. The MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) of kasugamycin for wild type or ΔyhiQ cells was 2 μg/ml, while ΔrsmA cells and the double mutant cells were both resistant to kasugamycin up to 100 μg/ml at which point growth is slightly inhibited. These data suggest that lack of the methyl group at residue G1516 does not contribute to the antibiotic resistance phenotype conferred by ΔrsmA.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, the data presented in this study demonstrate that yhiQ, a member of the DUF548/UPF0341 subfamily of proteins of unknown function, encodes the methyltransferase specific for m2G1516 in 16S rRNA, thus identifying a founder enzymatic function for this subfamily. We propose that the m2G1516 16S rRNA methyltransferase be renamed RsmJ, as previously suggested.11,36 A strain lacking RsmJ due to deletion of the rsmJ(yhiQ) gene is missing the methyl group at G1516 and exhibits a cold sensitive phenotype.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH grants GM16317 (MPD), GM58560 (KER), and GM92602 (KER). We thank Nina Constantino and Don Court of NIH for the scarless repair of rph-1 in MG1655(Seq) to make strain KRE10000. We thank Yusuf Kaya for the construction of lacZ mutant strains KRE10345 and KRE15500. We thank Brad J. Schmier and Ernesto Quesada Reyes for helpful advice.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Czerwoniec A, Dunin-Horkawicz S, Purta E, Kaminska KH, Kasprzak JM, Bujnicki JM, Grosjean H, Rother K. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D118–221. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Havelund JF, Giessing AM, Hansen T, Rasmussen A, Scott LG, Kirpekar F. Identification of 5-Hydroxycytidine at Position 2501 Concludes Characterization of Modified Nucleotides in E. coli 23S rRNA. J Mol Biol. 2011;411:529–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Decatur WA, Fournier MJ. rRNA modifications and ribosome function. Trends Biochem Sci. 2002;27:344–351. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(02)02109-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bachellerie JP, Cavaille J, Qu L. The Ribosome: Structure, Function, antibiotics and cellular interactions. ASM press; Washington DC: 2000. Nucleotide modification of eukaryotic rRNAs: the world of small nucleolar RNA guides revisited. Chapter 17; pp. 191–203. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Noon KR, Bruenger E, McCloskey JA. Posttranscriptional modifications in 16S and 23S rRNAs of the archaeal hyperthermophile Sulfolobus solfataricus. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:2883–2888. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.11.2883-2888.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guymon R, Pomerantz SC, Crain PF, McCloskey JA. Influence of phylogeny on posttranscriptional modification of rRNA in thermophilic prokaryotes: the complete modification map of 16S rRNA of Thermus thermophilus. Biochemistry. 2006;45:4888–4899. doi: 10.1021/bi052579p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mengel-Jorgensen J, Jensen SS, Rasmussen A, Poehlsgaard J, Iversen JJ, Kirpekar F. Modifications in Thermus thermophilus 23 S ribosomal RNA are centered in regions of RNA-RNA contact. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:22108–22117. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600377200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brimacombe R, Mitchell P, Osswald M, Stade K, Bochkariov D. Clustering of modified nucleotides at the functional center of bacterial ribosomal RNA. FASEB J. 1993;7:161–167. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.7.1.8422963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ofengand J, Bakin A. Mapping to nucleotide resolution of pseudouridine residues in large subunit ribosomal RNAs from representative eukaryotes, prokaryotes, archaebacteria, mitochondria and chloroplasts. J Mol Biol. 1997;266:246–268. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ofengand J, Malhotra A, Remme J, Gutgsell NS, Del Campo M, Jean-Charles S, Peil L, Kaya Y. Pseudouridines and pseudouridine synthases of the ribosome. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2001;66:147–159. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2001.66.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ofengand J, Del Campo M. Modified nucleosides in Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA. ASM press; Washington DC: 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Del Campo M, Recinos C, Yanez G, Pomerantz SC, Guymon R, Crain PF, McCloskey JA, Ofengand J. Number, position, and significance of the pseudouridines in the large subunit ribosomal RNA of Haloarcula marismortui and Deinococcus radiodurans. RNA. 2005;11:210–219. doi: 10.1261/rna.7209905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, Datsenko KA, Tomita M, Wanner BL, Mori H. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2(2):2006.0008. doi: 10.1038/msb4100050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Basturea GN, Rudd KE, Deutscher MP. Identification and characterization of RsmE, the founding member of a new RNA base methyltransferase family. RNA. 2006;12:426–434. doi: 10.1261/rna.2283106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Poldermans B, Roza L, Van Knippenberg PH. Studies on the function of two adjacent N6,N6-dimethyladenosines near the 3′ end of 16 S ribosomal RNA of Escherichia coli. III. Purification and properties of the methylating enzyme and methylase-30 S interactions. J Biol Chem. 1979;254:9094–9100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kitagawa M, Ara T, Arifuzzaman M, Ioka-Nakamichi T, Inamoto E, Toyonaga H, Mori H. Complete set of ORF clones of Escherichia coli ASKA library (a complete set of E. coli K-12 ORF archive): unique resources for biological research. DNA Res. 2005;12:291–299. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsi012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Siibak T, Remme J. Subribosomal particle analysis reveals the stages of bacterial ribosome assembly at which rRNA nucleotides are modified. RNA. 2011;16:2023–2032. doi: 10.1261/rna.2160010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marchler-Bauer A, Lu S, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Fong JH, Geer LY, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke Z, Lanczycki CJ, Lu F, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Omelchenko MV, Robertson CL, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zhang N, Zheng C, Bryant SH. CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D225–229. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997;278:631–637. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5338.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Forouhar F, Su M, Seetharaman J, Janjua H, Fang Y, Xiao R, Liu J, Baran MC, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Tong L, Hunt JF. Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) (PDB ID 2PGX) 2007 doi: 10.2210/pdb2pgx/pdb. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Forouhar F, Su M, Seetharaman J, Janjua H, Fang Y, Xiao R, Baran MC, Liu J, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Tong L, Hunt JF. Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) (PDB ID 2OYR) 2007 doi: 10.2210/pdb2oyr/pdb. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Forouhar F, Su M, Seetharaman J, Janjua H, Fang Y, Xiao Cunningam K, Ma L-C, Owens L, Liu J, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Tong L, Hunt JF. Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) (PDB ID 2PKW;) 2007 doi: 10.2210/pdb2pkw/pdb. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Forouhar F, Abashidze M, Seetharaman J, Mao L, Nwosu C, Fang Y, Xiao R, Baran MC, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Tong L, Hunt JF. Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) (PDB ID 2R6Z) 2007 doi: 10.2210/pdb2r6z/pdb. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Conlin CA, Miller CG. opdA, a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium gene encoding a protease, is part of an operon regulated by heat shock. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:518–521. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.2.518-521.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nonaka G, Blankschien M, Herman C, Gross CA, Rhodius VA. Regulon and promoter analysis of the E. coli heat-shock factor, sigma32, reveals a multifaceted cellular response to heat stress. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1776–1789. doi: 10.1101/gad.1428206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nichols RJ, Sen S, Choo YJ, Beltrao P, Zietek M, Chaba R, Lee S, Kazmierczak KM, Lee KJ, Wong A, Shales M, Lovett S, Winkler ME, Krogan NJ, Typas A, Gross CA. Phenotypic landscape of a bacterial cell. Cell. 2011;144:143–156. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sparling PF. Kasugamycin resistance: 30S ribosomal mutation with an unusual location on the Escherichia coli chromosome. Science. 1970;167:56–58. doi: 10.1126/science.167.3914.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Helser TL, Davies JE, Dahlberg JE. Mechanism of kasugamycin resistance in Escherichia coli. Nat New Biol. 1972;235:6–9. doi: 10.1038/newbio235006a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wrzesinski J, Bakin A, Nurse K, Lane BG, Ofengand J. Purification, cloning, and properties of the 16S RNA pseudouridine 516 synthase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1995;34:8904–89013. doi: 10.1021/bi00027a043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Okamoto S, Tamaru A, Nakajima C, Nishimura K, Tanaka Y, Tokuyama S, Suzuki Y, Ochi K. Loss of a conserved 7-methylguanosine modification in 16S rRNA confers low-level streptomycin resistance in bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2007;63:1096–1106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05585.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lesnyak DV, Osipiuk J, Skarina T, Sergiev PV, Bogdanov AA, Edwards A, Savchenko A, Joachimiak A, Dontsova OA. Methyltransferase that modifies guanine 966 of the 16 S rRNA: functional identification and tertiary structure. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5880–5887. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608214200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tscherne JS, Nurse K, Popienick P, Michel H, Sochacki M, Ofengand J. Purification, cloning, and characterization of the 16S RNA m5C967 methyltransferase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1999;38:1884–1892. doi: 10.1021/bi981880l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gu XR, Gustafsson C, Ku J, Yu M, Santi DV. Identification of the 16S rRNA m5C967 methyltransferase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1999;38:4053–4057. doi: 10.1021/bi982364y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tscherne JS, Nurse K, Popienick P, Ofengand J. Purification, cloning, and characterization of the 16 S RNA m2G1207 methyltransferase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:924–929. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.2.924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kimura S, Suzuki T. Fine-tuning of the ribosomal decoding center by conserved methyl-modifications in the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;38:1341–52. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Andersen NM, Douthwaite S. YebU is a m5C methyltransferase specific for 16 S rRNA nucleotide 1407. J Mol Biol. 2006;359:777–786. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES