Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 21.
Published in final edited form as: Immunity. 2014 Jul 24;41(2):296–310. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.014

Symbiotic Bacterial Metabolites Regulate Gastrointestinal Barrier Function via the Xenobiotic Sensor PXR and Toll-like Receptor 4

Madhukumar Venkatesh 1,10, Subhajit Mukherjee 1,10, Hongwei Wang 1, Hao Li 1, Katherine Sun 2, Alaxandre P Benechet 3, Zhijuan Qiu 3, Leigh Maher 3, Matthew R Redinbo 4, Robert S Phillips 5, James C Fleet 6, Sandhya Kortagere 7, Paromita Mukherjee 1, Alessio Fasano 8, Jessica Le Ven 9, Jeremy K Nicholson 9, Marc E Dumas 9, Kamal M Khanna 3,*, Sridhar Mani 1,*
PMCID: PMC4142105  NIHMSID: NIHMS611431  PMID: 25065623

Abstract

SUMMARY

Intestinal microbial metabolites are conjectured to affect mucosal integrity through an incompletely characterized mechanism. Here we showed microbial-specific indoles regulated intestinal barrier function through the xenobiotic sensor, pregnane X receptor (PXR). Indole 3-propionic acid (IPA), in the context of indole, is as a ligand for PXR in vivo, and IPA down-regulated enterocyte TNF–α while up-regulated junctional protein-coding mRNAs. PXR-deficient (Nr1i2−/−) mice showed a distinctly “leaky” gut physiology coupled with up-regulation of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway. These defects in the epithelial barrier were corrected in Nr1i2−/−Tlr4−/− mice. Our results demonstrate that a direct chemical communication between the intestinal symbionts and PXR regulates mucosal integrity through a pathway which involves luminal sensing and signaling by TLR4.

INTRODUCTION

Intestinal luminal contents (e.g., bacteria, food, metabolic by-products) are known to influence the gut barrier function through immune recognition (Clemente et al., 2012; Salzman, 2011). However, specific effects of microbial luminal metabolites on regulating epithelial innate immune homeostasis (e.g., epithelial barrier function) is incompletely characterized (Ashida et al., 2011). Indeed, disruption of epithelial barrier function is now emerging as an important mediator of intestinal inflammation (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease) (Fasano and Shea-Donohue, 2005; Maloy and Powrie, 2011; Xavier and Podolsky, 2007) as well as organ pathophysiology (e.g., allergy, diabetes, obesity, heart disease, arthritis, cognitive defects) (Gummesson et al., 2011; Islam and Luster, 2012; Mayer, 2011; Meier and Plevy, 2007; Turner, 2009).

Given that there are approximately 100 trillion bacteria in the intestines, their metabolic by-products and chemical repertoire are likely to be important mediators of as yet to be defined host phenotype (Rath and Dorrestein, 2012). Indeed, while dietary constituents have been shown to regulate barrier function, discrete mechanisms of microbial metabolites that regulate intestinal epithelial integrity remains elusive (Leavy, 2011). As adopted orphan nuclear receptors are known signaling intermediates for certain host-bacterial metabolites (e.g., bile acids and farnesoid x receptor (FXR), dietary ligands and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), we focused on pregnane X receptor (PXR), since its promiscuous ligand binding pocket might well be capable of accomodating diverse small bacterial metabolites (Watkins et al., 2001).

To test the hypothesis that elements of the host environment, (i.e. symbiotic bacteria) regulate intestinal barrier function through PXR, we focused on exploring the functions of indole metabolites (e.g., Indole 3-propionic acid, IPA), that are exclusively produced by intestinal commensal microbes (Wikoff et al., 2009). In mice, IPA synthesis appears linked to the intestinal commensal Clostridium sporogenes (Wikoff et al., 2009). In humans under homeostatic conditions, blood IPA and indole concentrations remain in micromolar and millimolar range, respectively, with intestinal concentrations predicted to be much higher (Bansal et al., 2010). To-date the cellular target of IPA remains elusive. To determine whether IPA could potentially regulate intestinal barrier function through PXR, we performed a combination of in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo studies of the effect of IPA on epithelial permeability and inflammation. The results showed that IPA (in the presence of indoles) served as a likely physiologic ligand for PXR and down-regulated enterocyte mediated inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) while up-regulating junctional protein-coding mRNAs. PXR-deficient (Nr1i2−/−) mice exhibited a distinctly “leaky” intestinal epithelium pathology, whereas replacing PXR using bone marrow chimeras established that PXR must be present in non-hematopoietic compartments for normal intestinal inflammatory signals and barrier functions. Importantly, Nr1i2−/− intestinal cells exhibited up-regulation of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4). These molecular events, as well as overall defects in the epithelial barrier, were corrected in Nr1i2−/−Tlr4−/− mice. Collectively, these results demonstrate that a direct chemical communication between the gastrointestinal symbionts and a specific nuclear receptor pathway, control mucosal homeostasis.

RESULTS

Symbiotic intestinal bacteria derived IPA regulates intestinal permeability and inflammation through PXR

To simulate in vivo homeostatic conditions, we activated PXR using a combination of indole with its respective metabolites. Although IPA alone was a weak human PXR (hPXR) agonist (EC50 120 μM, Emax 6.38 fold over control) (Figure 1A); IPA in combination with indole significantly activated hPXR (Figure 1B). Similar results were observed with indole 3 acetic acid (IAA) (Figures S1A) and supported by in silico docking studies (Figure S1B; Table S1; Figure S1C). In contrast, mouse PXR (mPXR) was potently activated by IPA (EC50 0.55 μM, Emax 18.84 fold over control) in vitro (Figure 1A) and induced PXR target gene transcription in vivo (Figure 1C; Figure S1D). More importantly, as specific indoles have been shown to activate the AhR (Denison and Nagy, 2003), we were unable to demonstrate activation of AhR by IPA (Figure S1E).

Figure 1. Commensal derived indole metabolite, IPA, regulates PXR activation.

Figure 1

(A) Transcriptional activity of a PXR reporter gene (multi-drug resistance-associated protein 2 or MRP2 luciferase) co-transfected with mPXR (black) and hPXR (red) expression plasmids in 293T cells following treatment with IPA (n=3). RLU, relative light unit.

(B) Transcriptional activity of a PXR reporter gene (MRP2 luciferase) co-transfected with hPXR expression plasmid in 293T cells following treatment with fixed concentration of indole (1 mM) and increasing concentrations of IPA (n=3). RLU, relative light unit. Data expressed as fold change in RLU compared to vehicle (DMSO) controls.

(C) Real-time qPCR analysis of Mdr-1 expression in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunum villi enterocytes following oral treatment with IPA (20 mg/kg/day) (n=5 per group). *P ≤ 0.0001; **P ≤ 0.001;n.s. not significant (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test).

(D) Schematic of germ free mouse treatment schedule. Six treatment groups are shown by color code: Swiss Webster Germ Free mice (SWGF) group, administered 100 μl LB and 100 μl sterilized water by oral gavage; SWGF + tryptophan (Trp) group, administered 100 μl LB + L-tryptophan; SWGF + Heat-killed C. sporogenes (C.s) group, administered C.s by oral gavage; SWGF + (C.s) group, administered C.s by oral gavage; SWGF + Heat-killed (C.s) + Trp group; and SWGF + C.s + Trp group, administered C.s and Trp by oral gavage (see Experimental Procedures). All the treatments were scheduled for six sequential days.

(E) Plasma IPA peak area intensity values plotted by treatment group as illustrated in the schema (D) Color coded histograms show mean ± s.e.m. values pertaining to each treatment group. IPA concentrations in micromoles (μM) are listed by color code.

(F) erum FITC-dextran recovery in treatment groups illustrated in schema (D).

*P ≤ 0.0001; (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test ); (n=6 per group).

(G) Real-time qPCR analysis of Mdr1, Cyp3a11 and Ugt1a1 mRNA expression in small intestinal mucosa from schema (D). All graphs show mean values ± s.e.m. Also see Figure S1,Table S1 and supplemental movies S1 and S2.

We next examined effect of indoles on enterocyte inflammatory signals and barrier function. Importantly, differences between Nr1i2−/− and Nr1i2+/+ mice were maintained when specifically assaying small intestinal permeability in vivo (Figures S1F and S1G) as well as using an in vivo multi-photon intravital microscopy (Figure S1H and supplemental movies S1 and S2).

For critical validation of the ex vivo experiments demonstrating IPA effects on junctional regulators, we co-administered C. sporogenes to germ-free mice in the presence or absence of L-tryptophan (Figure 1D). We verified that C. sporogenes inoculation led to production of IPA in vivo (thus, it was assumed that indoles were present) (Figure 1E). Germ-free mice exposed to C. sporogenes had a significant reduction in FITC-dextran recovery from the serum and this was further reduced in the presence of L-tryptophan dosing (Figure 1F). The mice intestinal mucosa exposed to C. sporogenes demonstrated significant induction of PXR target genes (Mdr1, Cyp3a11, Ugt1a1), which was further augmented in the presence of L-tryptophan (Figure 1G).

IPA regulates intestinal inflammation through PXR

To validate that IPA was driving the anti-inflammatory response in vivo directly via PXR, we exposed intestinal commensal-depleted Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice to live or heat-killed C. sporogenes. All mice were subsequently exposed to indomethacin (Figure 2A). We verified that only live C. sporogenes, but not the heat-killed bacterial inoculation, led to production of IPA in vivo (Figure 2B). There was a significant reduction in the histologic injury and in mucosal myeloperoxidase (MPO) enzyme activity in Nr1i2+/+ but not in Nr1i2−/− mice (Figures 2C and 2D). Furthermore, in these mice, intestinal mucosa exposed to the C. sporogenes had significant induction of PXR target gene (Ugt1a1) when compared to mice exposed to the heat-killed strain (Figure 2E). No such effects were observed in Nr1i2−/− mice (Figures 2B-2E).

Figure 2. Commensal C. sporogenes reconstitution decreases intestinal permeability and inflammation in a PXR-dependent manner in mice.

Figure 2

(A) Schematic of commensal depletion and C. sporogenes reconstitution experiment in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice (see Experimental Procedures).

(B) Plasma IPA peak area intensity values plotted by treatment groups as illustrated in the schema (A). The IPA concentrations in micromoles (μM) pertaining to each group is illustrated above each histogram.

(C) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of C. sporogenes + L-tryptophan and Heat killed C. sporogenes + L-tryptophan exposed Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunum cross-sections in accordance with schema (A). Scale bars, 50 μm.

(D) Jejunal MPO activity (unit/g of total protein) in treatment groups from schema (A) as illustrated.

(E) Real-time qPCR analysis of Ugt1a1 mRNA expression in small intestinal mucosa from schema (A).

(F and G) Serum FITC-dextran recovery following oral gavage of IPA (20 mg/kg/day) and indomethacin (see schematic) in (F) Nr1i2+/+ (n = 9) and (G) Nr1i2−/− (n = 9) mice.

All graphs show mean values ± s.e.m. *P ≤ 0.01 (Two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test); (n=6 per group). **P ≤ 0.01 (Student’s t-test); n.s. not significant. Also see Figure S2 and Table S2

The effects of C. sporogenes in vivo was directly validated using IPA administration by the oral route in both Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice. Although IPA effects could be non-target dependent based on the concentrations administered (i.e. non-specificity of molecular targets based on the concentration of IPA), we chose to study at fixed dose of IPA using an inflammation-based barrier defect (indomethacin) model. In this model, Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice were administered IPA followed by indomethacin and intestinal permeability assessed. The rationale was that a defect in permeability was required in order to show the effect of IPA in both the wild-type and Nr1i2−/− mice. IPA dosing significantly reduced FITC-dextran permeability in Nr1i2+/+ (Figure 2F) but not in Nr1i2−/− mice (Figure 2G).

In an in vivo model of 3-deoxy-D-manno-octulosonic acid (KDO2)-lipid A (TLR4 ligand) intubation, which elicits inflammatory signals without disrupting the intestinal tissue architecture (see experimental procedures), there was no overt histologic evidence of inflammation (Figure S2A). However, TNF-α mRNA (Figure S2B), p38-MAPK phosphorylation (Figure S2C), and permeability to FITC-dextran (Figure S2D), were clearly induced after KDO2 treatment. In this model, at IPA concentrations that were achievable through oral gavage (Figure S2E), we found that IPA notably decreased TNF-α mRNA expression more in the Nr1i2+/+ mice (3.73 fold) intestinal epithelium relative to Nr1i2−/− mice (1.72 fold) (Figure S2F). Together, these studies and the effects of IPA depletion in vivo (see Table S2; Figures S2G-S2I) establish PXR as an important enterocyte target of IPA.

Nr1i2−/− mice exhibit enhanced ultrastructural defects that directly correlate with increased intestinal permeability and xenobiotic toxicity

To study the function of PXR under steady-state conditions, we performed detailed histological analysis using 6-8 week old Nr1i2−/− and Nr1i2+/+ mouse intestines. Although gross features appeared unchanged, histological examination of the mucosa of Nr1i2−/− mice small intestines showed significant diminution of the villus-crypt ratio (Figure S3A), marked neutrophil infiltration and increased MPO enzyme activity (Figure S3B). The data shown compare the jejunum (highest expression of PXR in the intestine) of Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice; data pertaining to other regions (i.e. duodenum, ileum) have similar trends (data not shown). Although subtle, these differences indicate that the small intestine of Nr1i2−/− mice may persist in a state of mild elevated stress that may culminate as overt inflammation when exposed to injurious insults. Indeed, we did not observe any significant changes in unfolded protein response (UPR) genes (UPR RT2 ProfilerPCR Array, SABiosciences); however, a single gene, Serp1 mRNA, was induced 27-fold in Nr1i2−/− as compared with Nr1i2+/+ mouse intestinal mucosa (data not shown). The induction of Serp1 could act to stabilize membrane glycoprotein and stabilize their signaling (e.g., TLR4) (Yamaguchi et al., 1999). In keeping with the mild state of intestinal stress, defects observed in Nr1i2−/− mice are not due to any gross changes in proliferation (BrdU) or apoptosis (TUNEL) of the epithelium (Figure S3C).

To investigate whether PXR deficiency sensitizes mice to toxic insults, we subjected Nr1i2−/− and Nr1i2+/+ mice to four toxic intestinal injury models. In the indomethacin-induced (85 mg/kg body weight, ip, single dose) small intestine inflammation model, the Nr1i2+/+ mice exhibited modest inflammation by histology (Figure 3A) and in jejunal MPO activity (Figure 3B). In contrast, the Nr1i2−/− mice showed significantly enhanced basal MPO activity, which increased upon indomethacin treatment (Figure 3B). In evaluating the histology in Nr1i2−/− mice, the histologic score increased by 6.2 fold over that observed in Nr1i2+/+ mice (Figure 3C). In the anti-CD3 antibody induced intestinal inflammation-edema model, mice were exposed to anti-CD3 (clone 2C11, 200 μg ip) and tissues harvested 3 hours later for enteropooling. Notably, 100% of Nr1i2−/− mice given this dose of anti-CD3 antibody succumb to intestinal edema and died within 72 hours of dosing. Indeed, small bowel isolated after 24 hours of dosing with anti-CD3 antibody showed the mean values of enteropooling did not exceed 30 mg/cm (maximum value obtained ~ 31.5 mg/cm), suggesting that enteropooling values saturate around ~ 30-31 mg/cm (Musch et al., 2002). Although the changes in enterpooling values were not significantly different, it is clear that the Nr1i2−/− mice have increased susceptibility to anti-CD3 mediated injury based on the observation that the mean enteropooling values have maximized ~ 29.5 mg/cm (maximum value ~ 31.5 mg/cm) (Figure 3D). Therefore, the true increase in enteropooling is capped by saturated values in the anti-CD3 treated Nr1i2−/− mice. In addition, there was near complete blunting of crypt-villus architecture in Nr1i2−/− as compared to Nr1i2+/+ mice (Figure 3E). In the gastrointestinal ischemia-reperfusion model (I/R), the endogenous lectin complement pathway is a key initiator of intestinal inflammation in which the intestinal epithelium plays an important role in mediating such damage (Hart et al., 2005). An early finding that persists and then worsens with prolonged ischemia-reperfusion is intestinal barrier dysfunction as manifested by changes in intestinal permeability (Hart et al., 2005). We assessed FITC-dextran recovery after oral gavage of Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice. The change in permeability as assessed by a change in recovery of mean levels of FITC-dextran in the serum of mice for Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− was 193% and 488.9% (Figure 3F), respectively. These results suggest that the Nr1i2−/− mice are significantly more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion mediated changes in intesinal barrier function. Finally, we used an endotoxic shock model, whereby systemic LPS induces a sepsis like syndrome which prominently features intestinal barrier dysfunction (Roger et al., 2009). Nr1i2−/− mice treated with LPS had significantly worse survival than its Nr1i2+/+ counterpart suggesting that the loss of PXR significantly worsens survival in LPS-mediated septic syndrome, in which intestinal dysfunction plays a major role (Figure 3G). The LPS findings corroborate previous observations that PXR protects against LPS mediated liver damage (Wang et al., 2010). Together, Nr1i2−/− mice demonstrate heightened sensitivity towards all four direct and indirect toxic intestinal injury models (Figure 3) (Clayburgh et al., 2005; Ettarh and Carr, 1996; Zhou et al., 2006). The lack of significant steady-state gross inflammatory pathology in Nr1i2−/− mice, contrasts with this heightened sensitivity towards xenotoxic challenge. To reconcile these findings, we performed ultra-structural and biochemical analysis of Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunal epithelium. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of Nr1i2−/− mice intestinal epithelial cells showed loosely packed shorter microvilli relative to Nr1i2+/+ mice (Figures 4A and 4B). Additionally, Nr1i2−/− mice microvilli show significantly diminished digestive enzyme activities compared to Nr1i2+/+ microvilli (Figure 4C), and the activity (Figure 4D) and abundance (Figure 4E) of alkaline phosphatase is also notably reduced in the Nr1i2−/− mice intestine. Together, these data demonstrate that key aspects of the fine structure and enzyme expression in the Nr1i2−/− mice intestine would explain its enhanced sensitivity towards xenobiotic challenge (Matsui et al., 2011).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Nr1i2−/− mice are more susceptible to toxic injuries to the small intestine

(A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of indomethacin (Indo) treated Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunum cross-sections.

(B) Jejunal MPO activity (unit/g of total protein) in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice treated with indomethacin (n=6 per group).

(C) Histological score measuring severity of tissue damage in jejunum from Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice in indomethacin treated and untreated groups (n=6 per group).

(D) Weight to length ratio of the jejunum (enteropooling) in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice treated with anti-CD3 antibody. The change in weight-to-length ratio in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice exposed to anti-CD3 was 27.6% and 22.9%, respectively. Values represent mean ± s.e.m. (n=5 per group). (E) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of anti-CD3 antibody treated Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunum cross-sections.

(F) Serum FITC-dextran recovery following gastrointestinal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice (n=5 per group). The change in permeability as assessed by a change in recovery of mean levels of FITC - dextran in the serum of Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice was 193% and 488.9%, respectively.

(G) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice treated with LPS (n=6 per group).

All graphs show mean values ± s.e.m. *P ≤ 0.02; **P ≤ 0.0001 (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test ). Scale bars, 50 μm. Also see Figure S3.

Figure 4. Ultra-structural and functional defects in Nr1i2−/− mice small intestine.

Figure 4

(A and B) Representative TEM images of Nr1i2+/+ (A) and Nr1i2−/− (B) mice jejunum shows loose packing of microvilli in Nr1i2−/− mice. γ represents packing angle between adjacent microvilli. Packing of microvilli in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunum was quantified by assessing the packing angle (γ) between adjacent microvilli. γ in Nr1i2−/− mice cross-sections (81.0 ± 23.6°, n=273) is significantly higher and more variable compared to Nr1i2+/+ mice (59.6 ± 7.0°, n=275) (n=5 per group).

(C) Sucrase, maltase, lactase and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPPIV) enzyme activities in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunum villi enterocytes. Proportionality between amount of enzyme present (jejunal villi enterocyte homogenate containing 20 mg/ml of protein as enzyme, x-axis) and amount of substrate liberated (optical density, y-axis) in 60 minutes was plotted in the graph (n=8-10 per group).

(D) Alkaline phosphatase enzyme activity in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunum villi enterocyte homogenate (n=8-10 per group).

(E) Immunoblot analysis of alkaline phosphatase and β-actin (loading control) in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunum villi enterocytes (n=5 per group).

(F) Representative TEM images of Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunum enterocytes demonstrating cell-cell junctional complexes and perijunctional cytoskeletal condensation. Inset shows magnified views of cell-cell junctional complex.

(G) Real-time qPCR analysis of key Tj and Aj regulatory genes in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunum villi enterocytes (n=8-10 per group). Data plotted as fold change in Nr1i2−/− mice relative to mRNA levels in Nr1i2+/+ mice.

(H) Serum FITC-dextran recovery in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice following treatment with KDO2. (n=8-10 per group).

All graphs show mean values ± s.e.m.* , **P ≤ 0.0001; n.s. not significant (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test). Scale bars: A, B and F, 0.5 μm. Also see Figure S4.

We next examined the cell-cell junctional complex, an essential structural component of the epithelial barrier. TEM showed that the tight-junction (Tj) and adherens-junction (Aj) complex (black arrow) in Nr1i2−/− mice intestinal epithelium to be significantly more electron dense, diffuse with dense interconnected stranding (Figure 4F). The mRNA expression of these key junctional-complex markers were markedly diminished in the Nr1i2−/− mice, except Claudin-2 which is known to induce barrier defects (Figure 4G) (Van Itallie and Anderson, 2006). Immunofluorescence showed similar trends (Figure S4A and S4B). Furthermore, in comparison with Nr1i2+/+ mice, there is increased FITC-dextran recovery in serum (Figure 4H). Together, these ultra-structural and functional assays implicate PXR as a physiologic regulator of intestinal barrier function.

TLR4 signaling is an essential causative pathway in the epithelial barrier defects observed in the Nr1i2−/− mice

To screen for molecular mechanisms that are responsible for barrier dysfunction in Nr1i2−/− mice, we determined relative abundance of key host mRNAs encoding proteins involved in inflammation and microbial invasion. We performed real-time qPCR for anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial and pro-inflammatory markers using total RNA isolated from Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice villi enterocytes. In the Nr1i2−/− mice, there is a significant down-regulation of mRNAs involved in anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial function, along with a concomitant increase in pro-inflammatory cytokine mRNAs (Figure 5A). Given that TLRs are critical regulators of intestinal barrier function as well as inflammation, we chose to focus on them (Asquith and Powrie, 2010). We performed real-time qPCR for all ten mammalian (mouse) TLRs. TLR over-expression was modest (1.2 to 1.8 fold) and variable (Figure 5B); however, downstream TLR pathway kinase activation was enhanced in Nr1i2−/− mice (Figure S5A). Among the TLRs, TLR2 and 4 are expressed on the villi enterocytes and play significant roles in the regulation of intestinal barrier function (Cario, 2010). To identify the TLRs that may affect inflammatory cytokine mediated barrier function in Nr1i2−/− mice, we incubated Nr1i2−/− enterocytes ex vivo with TLR2 and 4 inhibitors. TLR2 inhibition increased TNF-α and IL-6 mRNA expression in the intestinal mucosa of Nr1i2−/− mice, conversely, TLR4 inhibition significantly suppressed cytokine mRNA expression (Figure S5B). Furthermore, we generated Nr1i2−/−Tlr2−/− mice and mucosa extracted from these mice show increased Tnf-α and Il-6 mRNA expression when compared to Nr1i2−/− (Figure S5C). These findings correlates with the observation that the loss of Tlr2 in Nr1i2−/− increased intestinal permeability (Figures S5D-S5F).

Figure 5. Small intestine epithelial barrier dysfunction in Nr1i2−/− mice requires TLR4 expression and signaling.

Figure 5

(A and B) Real-time qPCR analysis of (A) anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial, pro-inflammatory and (B) Tlr gene expression in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice jejunum villi enterocytes (n=8-10 per group). Data plotted as fold change in Nr1i2−/− mice relative to mRNA levels in Nr1i2+/+ mice.

(C) Immunoblot shows increased expression of TLR4 in Nr1i2−/− mice (n=6 per group) (left). Immunoblots are representative of three independent experiments. Quantitation of band density was performed with two blots each with three different exposure times (right).

(D) Real - time qPCR analysis of key regulatory genes of epithelial barrier function in Nr1i2+/+, Nr1i2−/−, Tlr4−/− and Nr1i2−/− /Tlr4−/− mice jejunum villi enterocytes (n=8-10 per group).

(E) Representative TEM images of Nr1i2+/+, Nr1i2−/−, Tlr4−/− and Nr1i2−/− / Tlr4−/− mice jejunum showing microvilli (left) and quantitation of average microvillus length (right).

(F) Representative TEM images of Nr1i2+/+, Nr1i2−/−, Tlr4−/− and Nr1i2−/− / Tlr4−/− mice jejunum showing cell-cell junctional complex.

(G) Enzyme (as denoted) activity assays performed with jejunal villi enterocyte homogenate from Nr1i2+/+, Nr1i2−/−, Tlr4−/− and Nr1i2−/− /Tlr4−/− mice. Data are expressed as fold change relative to Nr1i2+/+ mice.

(H) Serum FITC-dextran levels in Nr1i2+/+, Nr1i2−/−, Tlr4−/− and Nr1i2−/− /Tlr4−/− mice (n=8-10 per group). All graphs show mean values ± s.e.m. *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; n.s. not significant (A,B,D,E,G,H) (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test); (C) Student t-test. Scale bars: E and F, 0.5 μm. Also see Figure S5.

We focused next on TLR4 because it is a critical determinant of LPS signaling in the intestine (Abreu et al., 2001). The basal expression of TLR4 protein was modestly elevated (~1.8 fold) in Nr1i2−/− (Figure 5C) and we also observed an inverse relationship between Pxr and Tlr4 mRNA expression in an intestinal cell line, Caco-2 (data not shown) and primary human intestinal mucosa (data not shown). To study the role of TLR4 in barrier dysfunction in Nr1i2−/− mice, we crossed the Nr1i2−/− with Tlr4−/− mice. In comparison with Nr1i2−/− mice, the abundance of mRNAs encoding key Tj, Aj proteins, pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were reversed in Nr1i2−/−Tlr4−/− mice epithelium to levels comparable to those observed in Nr1i2+/+ mice (Figure 5D).

Since these markers encode for proteins involved in epithelial junctional complex formation and inflammation, we speculate that TLR4 is indeed responsible for the barrier dysfunction observed in Nr1i2−/− mice. To validate this hypothesis, we assessed if the magnitude of Tnf-α mRNA expression and FITC-dextran permeability was Tlr4 gene-dose dependent. We generated Tlr4 heterozygotes (at least ~50% reduction in protein) in Nr1i2−/− mice background (data not shown). Enterocyte Tnf-α mRNA expression and FITC-dextran recovery had similar quantitative reduction (Figures S5G and S5H). To further validate our observations regarding genes encoding junctional complex proteins, we performed TEM and immunofluorescence studies. The Nr1i2−/− Tlr4−/− mice have microvilli lengths that were larger than Nr1i2−/− mice and comparable to that observed in Nr1i2+/+ mice (Figure 5E). Indeed, the same trend was observed in the ultra-structure of the junctional complex (Figure 5F) and immunofluorescence staining for Zo-1 and E-cad (Figures S5I and S5J). The activities of brush border enzymes (Figure 5G) and FITC-dextran permeability (Figure 5H) in the Nr1i2−/−Tlr4−/− mice was also similar to that observed in Nr1i2+/+ mice. Additionally, Nr1i2−/−Tlr4−/− mice displayed significantly attenuated damage response to indomethacin (Figure 6A and 6B). Together, these studies show that Tlr4 is essential to maintain epithelial barrier defects observed in the Nr1i2−/− mice.

Figure 6. TLR4 is critical for indomethacin-induced intestinal injury as well as IPA effects on permeability in vivo.

Figure 6

(A) Representative Hematoxylin and eosin staining of vehicle (-Indo) and indomethacin (Indo) treated Nr1i2−/− /Tlr4−/− mice jejunum cross-sections (n=6 per group).

(B) Jejunal MPO activity (unit/g of total protein) in Nr1i2−/− and Nr1i2−/− /Tlr4−/− mice treated with indomethacin (n=6 per group). *P ≤ 0.005 (One-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test).

(C) Serum FITC-dextran recovery following oral gavage of IPA (20 mg/kg/day) and indomethacin (see schematic ) in Tlr−/− (n = 9) mice.

(D) Serum FITC-dextran recovery following oral gavage of IPA (20 mg/kg/day) and KDO2 200μg/day (see schematic) in conventional mice (Nr1i2+/+ ) and commensal depleted (CD) mice (Nr1i2+/+ ) (n = 8 per group). All graphs show mean values ± s.e.m. *P ≤ 0.004 ,**P ≤ 0.05; n.s. not significant (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test).

IPA protects against indomethacin induced intestinal injury via PXR and TLR4

To further validate the requirement for TLR4 as a critical determinant of the effects of microbiota-derived PXR ligand, IPA, Tlr4+/+ and Tlr4−/− mice were exposed to IPA followed by indomethacin (as previously described for experiments with Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice). The results demonstrate that the presence of Tlr4 is required IPA-induced changes in permeability defects induced by indomethacin (i.e. IPA significantly reduces FITC-dextran permeability induced by indomethacin) (Figure 6C). Indeed, to directly validate that the entire loop driven by microbiota-derived IPA results from modulation of TLR4 which in turn regulates intestinal permeability, Nr1i2+/+ mice were commensal depleted for 15 days and/or followed by exposure to TLR4 ligand, KDO2 and/or IPA delivered orally (Figure 6D). The results demonstrate that commensal depletion increased intestinal permeability, which was further worsened by ~2.8fold with the addition of the TLR4 ligand, KDO2. Note, in conventional Nr1i2−/− mice possessing intact intestinal microbiota (i.e. LPS), the FITC-dextran recovery in blood was ~ 856 μg/ml (Figure 4H) which is actually lower than commensal depleted Nr1i2+/+ mice exposed to KDO2 (~ 1495 μg/ml) (Figure 6D). In commensal depleted Nr1i2+/+ mice, reconstitution of mice with IPA results in a significant decrease in permeability. These results further validate our hypothesis that loss of microbiota producing IPA can induce a Nr1i2−/− like (not identical) state, whereby, the presence of a TLR4 ligand, KDO2, worsens intestinal permeability and is only corrected when IPA is reconstituted in Nr1i2+/+ mice (Figure 6D) but not in Nr1i2−/− mice (Figure 2F&G). Finally, to understand whether the initial signals leading to disruption of the epithelial barrier originates via hematopoietic or non-hematopoietic cells (e.g., predominantly the epithelium), we performed bone marrow chimera experiments between Nr1i2−/− and Nr1i2+/+ mice. These studies clearly show that immune reconstitution with either Nr1i2+/+ or Nr1i2−/− hematopoietic cells have no effect on pro-inflammatory markers and intestinal permeability to FITC-dextran (Figures 7A-7C). Indeed, since intestine homing hematopoietic derived cells are major source of cytokines that disrupt barrier function (e.g., TLR4 signaling), it should be stated that PXR negatively regulates TLR4 bone marrow derived macrophages or mononuclear cells (data not shown). We saw no changes in serum FITC-dextran recovery, Tnf-α or Il-6 mRNA in Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice transplanted with either Nr1i2−/− or Nr1i2+/+ bone marrow, respectively (Figures 7A-7C). In order to further determine if there was any contribution by TLR4 signals emanating from hematopoietic derived cells within the intestine, we derived combinatorial chimeric strains harboring loss or gain of TLR4 protein in these cells resident in Nr1i2+/+ or Nr1i2−/− mice. Nr1i2+/+ mice harboring either a gain or loss of TLR4 protein in bone marrow derived cells within the intestine (LP cells) showed similar levels of serum FITC-dextran recovery as well as Tnf-α or Il-6 mRNA, respectively. Nr1i2−/− mice expressing non-hematopoietic TLR4 and harboring either a gain or loss of TLR4 protein in bone marrow derived cells within the intestine (LP cells) showed no significant difference in serum FITC-dextran recovery or Tnf-α or Il-6 mRNA levels. Similar results were obtained in Nr1i2−/− mice with loss of non-hematopoietic TLR4 and harboring either a gain or loss of TLR4 protein in bone marrow derived cells within the intestine (LP cells) (Figures 7D and 7E). This effectively shows that bone marrow derived TLR4, a major LPS-responsive effector of Tnf-α, is unable to alter the intestinal phenotype induced by non-hematopoietic tissue. Thus, PXR resident in the non-hematopoietic compartment (i.e., epithelium) is important in dictating the initial response to external cues inciting epithelial barrier dysfunction.

Figure 7. Epithelial barrier defects in Nr1i2−/− mice small intestine is dependent on non-hematopoietic (epithelium) compartment.

Figure 7

(A and B) Real-time qPCR analysis of pro-inflammatory markers (A) Tnf-α and (B) Il-6 was assessed in Nr1i2+/+ (n=10), Nr1i2−/− (n=10), Nr1i2+/+ BM→ Nr1i2+/+ (n=9), Nr1i2+/+ BM→ Nr1i2−/− (n=9), Nr1i2−/− BM→ Nr1i2+/+ (n=6) and Nr1i2−/− BM→ Nr1i2−/− (n=5) mice jejunal villi enterocytes. Data are expressed as fold change in all mice groups compared to Nr1i2+/+ mice.

(C) In vivo FITC-dextran permeability assay was performed in Nr1i2+/+ (n=10 mice), Nr1i2−/− (n=10), Nr1i2+/+ BM→ Nr1i2+/+ (n=9), Nr1i2+/+ BM→ Nr1i2−/− (n=9), Nr1i2−/− BM→ Nr1i2+/+ (n=6) and Nr1i2−/− BM→ Nr1i2−/− (n=5) mice.

(D) Real-time PCR analysis of proinflammatory markers (blue) Tnf-α and (red) Il-6 was assessed in genotypes illustrated (n=5) mice jejunal mucosa. Data are expressed as fold change in all mice groups compared to Nr1i2−/− /Tlr4+/+Nr1i2+/+ /Tlr4+/+ mice.

(E) In vivo FITC-dextran permeability assay was performed in (n=5) mice jejunal mucosa.

All graphs show mean values ± s.e.m.; n.s. not significant (Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test).

DISCUSSION

The regulation of the intestinal barrier by intestinal commensal bacteria has been alluded to in several important reviews on this topic (Abreu, 2010; Salzman, 2011; Wells et al., 2011). However, thus far few discrete mechanisms have emerged (Abreu, 2010; Chen et al., 2010; Kelly et al., 2004; Patel et al., 2012). Our data supports the role that PXR is an essential regulator of intestinal barrier effects under conditions of homeostasis. The four models of bowel injury, as well as evidence of chronic subclinical inflammation under basal conditions (Zhou et al., 2006), suggests that PXR is an essential modifier of innate immunity in the intestine and its response to xenobiotic injury. Both these elements can be tied to intestinal barrier function, which is clearly aberrant in Nr1i2−/− mice (Matsui et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2006). Bone marrow chimera studies indicate that neither Nr1i2+/+ or Nr1i2−/− bone marrow alters expression of Tnf-α, Il-6 and FITC-dextran recovery in mice of the opposite genotype, which strongly indicates that PXR expression in the non-hematopoietic compartment determines the epithelial phenotype. Since PXR is expressed predominantly in epithelial but not mesenchymal cells (Bookout et al., 2006) it is logical to conclude that the state of activation of epithelial PXR is paramount in determining the initial events leading to the observed intestinal barrier phenotype. Indeed, villus expression of PXR within the intestinal mucosa, puts this receptor in nearest contact with the bacterial commensals in the lumen. A notable caveat in our experiments was that in order to demonstrate the plausibility that indoles would have a physiologic target in vivo, we performed all our experiments using ex vivo systems (i.e. intestinal tissues incubated in OLA rather than in vivo administration). These experiments were performed ex vivo to circumvent the inherent problem associated with a perfect drug like OLA (PubChem, ST093573) which will likely be absorbed almost completely by mucosal surfaces thus precluding efficient luminal delivery. In this context, germ-free mice (either gnotobiotic or axenic) would not be ideal experiments since only specific gut bacteria produce indoles and its metabolites (e.g., C. sporogenes in mice) (Wikoff et al., 2009). The exact species producing indoles and its metabolites in humans remain unknown; however, C. sporogenes is a soil bacterium present in humans and germ-free mice replete with this bacterium do show alterations in intestinal barrier function. Indeed, these results are consistent with and extend prior observations that germ-free mice reconstituted with conventional intestinal microbes, significantly increase liver PXR and its target gene, Cyp3a11 expression (Claus et al., 2011). We have performed microbial reconstitution experiments in commensal-depleted mice that have validated our ex vivo observations that bacterial indoles (in particular IPA) directly affect intestinal barrier properties in vivo through actions mediated via PXR.

Our data implicate epithelial PXR as a central regulator of TLR4 mediated control of the intestinal barrier function. This regulation is intrinsically associated with intestinal commensals, specifically those involved with the metabolism of tryptophan and production of indoles and specific metabolites (i.e. IPA). We hypothesize that this association is tightly regulated to ensure “fine-tuning” of TLR4 expression in the intestine at levels appropriate to the abundance of LPS and perhaps other microbial-derived ligands. For homeostasis, all three components of this system (indole secreting intestinal commensals, epithelial PXR expression, and TLR4) must be at appropriate levels for a given host – a lack of IPA or PXR or an excess of TLR4 can lead to intestinal barrier dysfunction. In fact, compromised intestinal barrier function has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several disease states (e.g., type I diabetes, asthma, autism, acne, allergies etc.) including inflamatory bowel disease (IBD) (Gummesson et al., 2011; Islam and Luster, 2012; Mayer, 2011; Meier and Plevy, 2007; Turner, 2009). Hence, search for effective treatment options to prevent intestinal epithelial barrier defects may have broader implications beyond IBD.

Moreover, our data in epithelial cells complement parallel nuclear receptor driven pathways in intestinal immune cells that regulate barrier function (Kelly et al., 2004; Leavy, 2011). It adds a new dimension to recent observations that the intestinal epithelial homeostasis is tightly orchestrated by the circadian clock (e.g., RevErbα) as well as microbiota transduced by TLRs (Mukherji et al., 2013) and that bacterially derived uracil serve as modulators of mucosal immunity and intestine-microbe homeostasis in Drosophila (Lee et al., 2013). Metabolomic analysis have identified low levels of tryptophan in Il10−/− mice and its host-derived kyneurenine metabolite levels are elevated. These observations have led to the hypothesis that the kynurenine metabolites might be involved in the regulation of immune tolerance towards intestinal microbiota by inducing Treg differentiation that produce IL10 (Lin et al., 2010). Furthermore, plasma tryptophan levels are reduced in patients with Crohn’s disease (Gupta et al., 2012; Hisamatsu et al., 2012). Interestingly, fecal tryptophan levels are elevated in patients with Crohn’s disease, suggesting perhaps that tryptophan metabolism is blunted in the microbiota of these patients (Jansson et al., 2009). In keeping with this notion of reduced tryptophan metabolism, indoxyl sulphate (product of indole metabolism by bacteria) is reduced in mice exposed to DSS (Dong et al., 2013) and IPA is significantly reduced in the H. hepaticus colitis model in Rag2−/− mice (Lu et al., 2012). Furthermore, patients with HIV infection demonstrate an inverse correlation of serum IPA and LPS (marker of intestinal microbial translocation) supporting the view that IPA regulates intestinal permeability in humans (Cassol et al., 2013). These observations are consistent with the notion that altered bacterial amino acid metabolism correlates with intestinal homeostasis (Martin et al., 2008). Thus, taken together, these observations provide important chemical biology steps toward a more comprehensive understanding of intestinal barrier function.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cell lines and reagents

The human colon cancer cell lines (Caco-2 and LS174T) and 293T cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured according to ATCC recommendations. For further details refer Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Mice

Tlr4−/− (B6.B10ScN-Tlr4lps-del/JthJ, stock number 007227), Tlr2−/− (B6.129-Tlr2tm1Kir/J, stock number 004650) and C57BL/6J (stock number 000664) mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Swiss Webster (SW, control) and Swiss Webster Germ Free (SWGF) mice (7-8 weeks old, female) were purchased from Taconic (Hudson, NY). All animal experiments were approved by the animal institute committee (protocol # 20070715, 20100711) of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and were performed in accordance with institutional and national guidelines. For further details refer Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Genotyping

Mouse tail DNAs were used for genotyping according to manufacturer’s instructions (DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit, Qiagen). Primer sequences and methods are in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Histology and Immunofluorescence analysis

Intestinal tissue sections (paraffin and frozen) were prepared and Hematoxylin-eosin staining were performed in the Histology core facility of Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Histological scoring was performed according to previously published methods (Asano et al., 2009). Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Isolation of small intestine villi enterocytes

We have employed the modified Weiser method to isolate pure villus enterocytes from the jejunum in all mice experiments as previously published (Weiser, 1973). Details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

In vitro transcription assay

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Oral dosing of IPA

Nr1i2+/+ and Nr1i2−/− mice were gavaged with 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg IPA, dissolved in sterile PBS (pH 7.4) in 100 μl volume per mice for four consecutive days. Swiss Webster (SW) and Swiss Webster Germ Free (SWGF) mice were orally gavaged with 20 mg/kg IPA for four consecutive days.

Transmission electron microscopy

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Enzyme activity assay

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Tissue myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity assay

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

In vivo intestine permeability assay

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Germ free mice

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Commensal depletion

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Immunoblot

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

In vivo toxic small intestine injury models

For indomethacin induced mouse jejunitis model, we have modified a protocol published by Ettarh and Carr by using a single intraperitoneal dose of indomethacin to reduce the toxicity in Nr1i2−/− mice (Ettarh and Carr, 1996). Details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Bone marrow transplantation

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

BrdU and TUNEL staining

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

TLR2 and 4 inhibition experiments

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Intravital imaging of the intestines

Experimental details in Supplemental Experiemental Procedures.

Lenti-based shRNA knock-down systems

Details of the procedure can be found in the recent publication by our laboratory (Wang et al., 2011).

Statistical analysis

Data are shown as mean ± s.e.m. The significance of difference was analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t-test or ANOVA with post-hoc tests were used as indicated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival and differences were analyzed by the log rank test (Figure 3G). All analyses were performed using GraphPad PRISM version 6.01 (GraphPad Software). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supplementary Material

01
02
Download video file (559.8KB, mov)
03
Download video file (1.3MB, mov)
04

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Analytical Imaging and Histotechnology and comparative pathology facilities of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. We thank Dr. Jeff Staudinger (University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS) and Dr. Wen Xie (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) for providing Nr1i2−/− and humanized PXR transgenic mice (hNr1i2) respectively.This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA127231, CA161879 and Damon Runyon Foundation Clinical Investigator Award (CI 1502) P30CA013330.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  1. Abreu MT. Toll-like receptor signalling in the intestinal epithelium: how bacterial recognition shapes intestinal function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:131–144. doi: 10.1038/nri2707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abreu MT, Vora P, Faure E, Thomas LS, Arnold ET, Arditi M. Decreased expression of Toll-like receptor-4 and MD-2 correlates with intestinal epithelial cell protection against dysregulated proinflammatory gene expression in response to bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Journal of immunology. 2001;167:1609–1616. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asano T, Tanaka K, Yamakawa N, Adachi H, Sobue G, Goto H, Takeuchi K, Mizushima T. HSP70 confers protection against indomethacin-induced lesions of the small intestine. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2009;330:458–467. doi: 10.1124/jpet.109.152181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashida H, Ogawa M, Kim M, Mimuro H, Sasakawa C. Bacteria and host interactions in the gut epithelial barrier. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;8:36–45. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Asquith M, Powrie F. An innately dangerous balancing act: intestinal homeostasis, inflammation, and colitis-associated cancer. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2010;207:1573–1577. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bansal T, Alaniz RC, Wood TK, Jayaraman A. The bacterial signal indole increases epithelial-cell tight-junction resistance and attenuates indicators of inflammation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:228–233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906112107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bookout AL, Jeong Y, Downes M, Yu RT, Evans RM, Mangelsdorf DJ. Anatomical profiling of nuclear receptor expression reveals a hierarchical transcriptional network. Cell. 2006;126:789–799. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cario E. Toll-like receptors in inflammatory bowel diseases: a decade later. Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2010;16:1583–1597. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cassol E, Misra V, Holman A, Kamat A, Morgello S, Gabuzda D. Plasma metabolomics identifies lipid abnormalities linked to markers of inflammation, microbial translocation, and hepatic function in HIV patients receiving protease inhibitors. BMC infectious diseases. 2013;13:203. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen HQ, Yang J, Zhang M, Zhou YK, Shen TY, Chu ZX, Hang XM, Jiang YQ, Qin HL. Lactobacillus plantarum ameliorates colonic epithelial barrier dysfunction by modulating the apical junctional complex and PepT1 in IL-10 knockout mice. American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology. 2010;299:G1287–1297. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00196.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Claus SP, Ellero SL, Berger B, Krause L, Bruttin A, Molina J, Paris A, Want EJ, de Waziers I, Cloarec O, et al. Colonization-induced host-gut microbial metabolic interaction. MBio. 2011;2:e00271–00210. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00271-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Clayburgh DR, Barrett TA, Tang Y, Meddings JB, Van Eldik LJ, Watterson DM, Clarke LL, Mrsny RJ, Turner JR. Epithelial myosin light chain kinase-dependent barrier dysfunction mediates T cell activation-induced diarrhea in vivo. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2005;115:2702–2715. doi: 10.1172/JCI24970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW, Knight R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell. 2012;148:1258–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Denison MS, Nagy SR. Activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor by structurally diverse exogenous and endogenous chemicals. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2003;43:309–334. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.135828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dong F, Zhang L, Hao F, Tang H, Wang Y. Systemic Responses of Mice to Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Acute Ulcerative Colitis Using H NMR Spectroscopy. J Proteome Res. 2013 doi: 10.1021/pr4002383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ettarh RR, Carr KE. Morphometric analysis of the small intestinal epithelium in the indomethacin-treated mouse. Journal of anatomy. 1996;189:51–56. Pt 1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fasano A, Shea-Donohue T. Mechanisms of disease: the role of intestinal barrier function in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal autoimmune diseases. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;2:416–422. doi: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gummesson A, Carlsson LM, Storlien LH, Backhed F, Lundin P, Lofgren L, Stenlof K, Lam YY, Fagerberg B, Carlsson B. Intestinal permeability is associated with visceral adiposity in healthy women. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;19:2280–2282. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gupta NK, Thaker AI, Kanuri N, Riehl TE, Rowley CW, Stenson WF, Ciorba MA. Serum analysis of tryptophan catabolism pathway: correlation with Crohn's disease activity. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:1214–1220. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. >Hart ML, Ceonzo KA, Shaffer LA, Takahashi K, Rother RP, Reenstra WR, Buras JA, Stahl GL. Gastrointestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury is lectin complement pathway dependent without involving C1q. Journal of immunology. 2005;174:6373–6380. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hisamatsu T, Okamoto S, Hashimoto M, Muramatsu T, Andou A, Uo M, Kitazume MT, Matsuoka K, Yajima T, Inoue N, et al. Novel, objective, multivariate biomarkers composed of plasma amino acid profiles for the diagnosis and assessment of inflammatory bowel disease. PloS one. 2012;7:e31131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Islam SA, Luster AD. T cell homing to epithelial barriers in allergic disease. Nat Med. 2012;18:705–715. doi: 10.1038/nm.2760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jansson J, Willing B, Lucio M, Fekete A, Dicksved J, Halfvarson J, Tysk C, Schmitt-Kopplin P. Metabolomics reveals metabolic biomarkers of Crohn's disease. PloS one. 2009;4:e6386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kelly D, Campbell JI, King TP, Grant G, Jansson EA, Coutts AG, Pettersson S, Conway S. Commensal anaerobic gut bacteria attenuate inflammation by regulating nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of PPAR-gamma and RelA. Nature immunology. 2004;5:104–112. doi: 10.1038/ni1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Leavy O. Mucosal immunology: the 'AHR diet' for mucosal homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:806. doi: 10.1038/nri3115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee KA, Kim SH, Kim EK, Ha EM, You H, Kim B, Kim MJ, Kwon Y, Ryu JH, Lee WJ. Bacterial-derived uracil as a modulator of mucosal immunity and gut-microbe homeostasis in Drosophila. Cell. 2013;153:797–811. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin HM, Barnett MP, Roy NC, Joyce NI, Zhu S, Armstrong K, Helsby NA, Ferguson LR, Rowan DD. Metabolomic analysis identifies inflammatory and noninflammatory metabolic effects of genetic modification in a mouse model of Crohn's disease. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:1965–1975. doi: 10.1021/pr901130s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lu K, Knutson CG, Wishnok JS, Fox JG, Tannenbaum SR. Serum metabolomics in a Helicobacter hepaticus mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease reveal important changes in the microbiome, serum peptides, and intermediary metabolism. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:4916–4926. doi: 10.1021/pr300429x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Maloy KJ, Powrie F. Intestinal homeostasis and its breakdown in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2011;474:298–306. doi: 10.1038/nature10208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Martin FP, Wang Y, Sprenger N, Yap IK, Rezzi S, Ramadan Z, Pere-Trepat E, Rochat F, Cherbut C, van Bladeren P, et al. Top-down systems biology integration of conditional prebiotic modulated transgenomic interactions in a humanized microbiome mouse model. Mol Syst Biol. 2008;4:205. doi: 10.1038/msb.2008.40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Matsui H, Shimokawa O, Kaneko T, Nagano Y, Rai K, Hyodo I. The pathophysiology of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced mucosal injuries in stomach and small intestine. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2011;48:107–111. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.10-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mayer EA. Gut feelings: the emerging biology of gut-brain communication. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:453–466. doi: 10.1038/nrn3071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Meier C, Plevy S. Therapy insight: how the gut talks to the joints--inflammatory bowel disease and the spondyloarthropathies. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007;3:667–674. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mukherji A, Kobiita A, Ye T, Chambon P. Homeostasis in Intestinal Epithelium Is Orchestrated by the Circadian Clock and Microbiota Cues Transduced by TLRs. Cell. 2013;153:812–827. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Musch MW, Clarke LL, Mamah D, Gawenis LR, Zhang Z, Ellsworth W, Shalowitz D, Mittal N, Efthimiou P, Alnadjim Z, et al. T cell activation causes diarrhea by increasing intestinal permeability and inhibiting epithelial Na+/K+-ATPase. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2002;110:1739–1747. doi: 10.1172/JCI15695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Patel RM, Myers LS, Kurundkar AR, Maheshwari A, Nusrat A, Lin PW. Probiotic bacteria induce maturation of intestinal claudin 3 expression and barrier function. Am J Pathol. 2012;180:626–635. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rath CM, Dorrestein PC. The bacterial chemical repertoire mediates metabolic exchange within gut microbiomes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012;15:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Roger T, Froidevaux C, Le Roy D, Reymond MK, Chanson AL, Mauri D, Burns K, Riederer BM, Akira S, Calandra T. Protection from lethal gram-negative bacterial sepsis by targeting Toll-like receptor 4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:2348–2352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808146106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Salzman NH. Microbiota-immune system interaction: an uneasy alliance. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Turner JR. Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:799–809. doi: 10.1038/nri2653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Van Itallie CM, Anderson JM. Claudins and epithelial paracellular transport. Annual review of physiology. 2006;68:403–429. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040104.131404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang H, Venkatesh M, Li H, Goetz R, Mukherjee S, Biswas A, Zhu L, Kaubisch A, Wang L, Pullman J, et al. Pregnane X receptor activation induces FGF19-dependent tumor aggressiveness in humans and mice. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2011;121:3220–3232. doi: 10.1172/JCI41514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang K, Damjanov I, Wan YJ. The protective role of pregnane X receptor in lipopolysaccharide/D-galactosamine-induced acute liver injury. Lab Invest. 2010;90:257–265. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2009.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Watkins RE, Wisely GB, Moore LB, Collins JL, Lambert MH, Williams SP, Willson TM, Kliewer SA, Redinbo MR. The human nuclear xenobiotic receptor PXR: structural determinants of directed promiscuity. Science. 2001;292:2329–2333. doi: 10.1126/science.1060762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Weiser MM. Intestinal epithelial cell surface membrane glycoprotein synthesis. II. Glycosyltransferases and endogenous acceptors of the undifferentiated cell surface membrane. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1973;248:2542–2548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wells JM, Rossi O, Meijerink M, van Baarlen P. Epithelial crosstalk at the microbiota-mucosal interface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4607–4614. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000092107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wikoff WR, Anfora AT, Liu J, Schultz PG, Lesley SA, Peters EC, Siuzdak G. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:3698–3703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812874106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Xavier RJ, Podolsky DK. Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2007;448:427–434. doi: 10.1038/nature06005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yamaguchi A, Hori O, Stern DM, Hartmann E, Ogawa S, Tohyama M. Stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein 1 (SERP1)/Ribosome-associated membrane protein 4 (RAMP4) stabilizes membrane proteins during stress and facilitates subsequent glycosylation. J Cell Biol. 1999;147:1195–1204. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.6.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhou C, Tabb MM, Nelson EL, Grun F, Verma S, Sadatrafiei A, Lin M, Mallick S, Forman BM, Thummel KE, Blumberg B. Mutual repression between steroid and xenobiotic receptor and NF-kappaB signaling pathways links xenobiotic metabolism and inflammation. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2006;116:2280–2289. doi: 10.1172/JCI26283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01
02
Download video file (559.8KB, mov)
03
Download video file (1.3MB, mov)
04

RESOURCES