Abstract
Despite decades of speculation that inhibiting endogenous insulin degradation might treat type-2 diabetes1, 2, and the identification of IDE (insulin-degrading enzyme) as a diabetes susceptibility gene3, 4, the relationship between the activity of the zinc metalloprotein IDE and glucose homeostasis remains unclear. Although Ide−/− mice have elevated insulin levels, they exhibit impaired, rather than improved, glucose tolerance that may arise from compensatory insulin signalling dysfunction5, 6. IDE inhibitors that are active in vivo are therefore needed to elucidate IDE’s physiological roles and to determine its potential to serve as a target for the treatment of diabetes. Here we report the discovery of a physiologically active IDE inhibitor identified from a DNA-templated macrocycle library. An X-ray structure of the macrocycle bound to IDE reveals that it engages a binding pocket away from the catalytic site, which explains its remarkable selectivity. Treatment of lean and obese mice with this inhibitor shows that IDE regulates the abundance and signalling of glucagon and amylin, in addition to that of insulin. Under physiological conditions that augment insulin and amylin levels, such as oral glucose administration, acute IDE inhibition leads to substantially improved glucose tolerance and slower gastric emptying. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of modulating IDE activity as a new therapeutic strategy to treat type-2 diabetes and expand our understanding of the roles of IDE in glucose and hormone regulation.
To discover small-molecule modulators of IDE, we performed in vitro selections on a DNA-templated library of 13,824 synthetic macrocycles7, 8 for the ability to bind immobilized mouse IDE, resulting in six candidate IDE-binding molecules (Extended Data Fig. 1).The 20-membered macrocycle 6b (Fig. 1a, half-maximum inhibitory concentration IC50 = 60 nM) potently inhibited IDE activity in three complementary assays (Extended Data Fig. 2)9. We synthesized and biochemically assayed 30 analogues of 6b in which each building block was systematically varied to elucidate the structural and stereochemical requirements (Extended Data Fig. 1), and based on the results we identified the inhibitor 6bK (IC50 = 50 nM, Fig. 1b) as an ideal candidate for in vivo studies.
The selectivity of 6bK in vitro was ≥1,000-fold for inhibition of IDE over all other metalloproteases tested, a substantial improvement over the previously reported substrate mimetic hydroxamic acid inhibitor Ii110 (Fig. 1d, e). The selectivity of 6bK, coupled with its ability to inhibit IDE in a synergistic, rather than competitive, manner with Ii1 (Extended Data Fig. 2), led us to speculate that the macrocycle engages a binding site distinct from the enzyme’s catalytic site (Supplementary Discussion).
We determined the X-ray crystal structure of catalytically inactive cysteine-free human IDE11 bound to 6b at 2.7 Å resolution (Fig. 1g, Extended Data Fig. 3). Macrocycle 6b occupies a binding pocket at the interface of IDE domains 1 and 2, and is positioned 11 Å away from the catalytic zinc ion (Fig. 1h). This distal binding site is a unique structural feature of IDE compared to related metalloproteases12, and does not overlap with the binding site of Ii110. IDE mutations predicted by the structure to impede macrocycle binding led to losses of 6bK potency (Fig. 1f), and complementary changes in 6b analogues rescued inhibition (Supplementary Discussion, Extended Data Fig. 4). The structure predicts that by engaging this distal site the macrocycle precludes substrate binding and abrogates key interactions that are necessary to unfold peptides for cleavage (Supplementary Video)13, 14.
We characterized the stability, and the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties, of 6bK formulated in Captisol15, a β-cyclodextrin agent used to improve delivery through intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection at 2 mg 6bK per animal (Supplementary Discussion, Extended Data Fig. 5). The long half-life in mouse plasma (> 2 h) and in circulation (> 1h) of 6bK suggested that it was suitable for in vivo studies (Extended Data Fig. 5). Injection of 6bK resulted in high levels of the inhibitor (> 100-fold IC50) in peripheral circulation and in the liver and kidneys, the main insulin-degrading organs. In contrast, 6bK was undetectable in brain tissue, where IDE is known to degrade amyloid peptides5 (Extended Data Fig. 5), and levels of Aβ(40) and Aβ(42) peptides in mice injected with 6bK were unchanged (Extended Data Fig. 5). Taken together, these findings suggested the viability of 6bK as an in vivo IDE inhibitor.
To evaluate the ability of 6bK to inhibit IDE activity in vivo, we subjected non-fasted mice to insulin tolerance tests 30 min after a single injection with 6bK (2 mg per animal, 80 mg kg−1). Mice treated with 6bK experienced lower hypoglycaemia and higher insulin levels compared to vehicle controls (P < 0.01, see below and Extended Data Fig. 5). These experiments establish that a selective and physiologically stable pharmacological IDE inhibitor can augment the abundance and activity of insulin in vivo.
Next we determined the physiological consequences of acute IDE inhibition for glucose tolerance. We used two methods of glucose delivery (oral gavage or i.p. injection16) and two different mouse models (lean or diet-induced obese (DIO) mice17, 18). These four conditions were chosen to survey the role of IDE activity under a broad range of endogenous insulin levels and insulin sensitivities16, 17. Oral glucose administration results in greater insulin secretion compared to injected glucose delivery (Extended Data Fig. 6) that arises from the ‘incretin effect’17, 19. DIO mice display hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance, and serve as a model for early type-2 diabetes in humans18.
During oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs, Fig. 2a and b), both lean and DIO mice treated with 6bK displayed significantly improved glucose tolerance compared to control groups treated either with vehicle alone, or with the inactive stereoisomer bisepi-6bK (Figs 1c, 2a and b; Extended Data Fig. 7). Effects of similar magnitude on oral glucose tolerance in mice have been observed from several human diabetes therapeutics (Extended Data Fig. 8)19–21. The vehicle and bisepi-6bK control groups exhibited similar blood glucose profiles, indicating that that the effects of 6bK on glucose tolerance are lost when the stereochemistry of 6bK is altered in a way that abolishes IDE inhibition. Collectively, these observations represent the first demonstration that transient IDE inhibition improves blood glucose tolerance1.
We repeated the above experiments with 6bK using i.p.-injected glucose tolerance tests (IPGTTs). In contrast to the observed improvement in oral glucose tolerance on 6bK treatment, IDE inhibition with 6bK followed by a glucose injection (1.5 g kg−1 i.p.) surprisingly resulted in impaired glucose tolerance in both lean and obese mice compared to vehicle alone or bisepi-6bK-treated controls (Fig. 2d and e). DIO mice treated with 6bK followed by glucose injection displayed a biphasic response: glucose levels were lower over the initial 30 min of the IPGTT, followed by a hyperglycaemic ‘rebound’ starting 1 h after glucose injection (Fig. 2e and Extended Data Fig. 7).To further test if the effects of 6bK are specific to its interaction with IDE, we repeated these experiments using Ide−/− knockout mice5, 6. Mice lacking IDE were not affected by 6bK treatment and exhibited OGTT and IPGTT blood glucose responses comparable to that of vehicle-treated cohorts (Fig. 2c and f), suggesting that blood glucose profile improvement during OGTT and impairment during IPGTT of 6bK-treated wild-type mice are mediated by IDE.
The dependence of the physiological response to 6bK on the route of glucose administration cannot be easily explained by a simple model in which IDE only degrades insulin. Instead, these results strongly suggest a role for IDE in modulating other glucose-regulating hormones in vivo beyond insulin. The biochemical properties of IDE and its substrate recognition mechanism12, 13 enable this enzyme to cleave a wide range of peptide substrates in vitro for which experimental validation in vivo has not been previously possible (Supplementary Table 1). Two glucose-regulating hormones, beyond insulin, that are potential candidates for physiological regulation by IDE are glucagon and amylin. Whereas purified IDE can cleave these two peptides in vitro22, 23, neither hormone is known to be regulated by IDE in vivo or ex vivo.
To probe the possibility that glucagon and/or amylin are regulated in vivo by IDE, we measured plasma levels of these hormones in DIO mice treated with 6bK or vehicle alone following IPGTTs (Fig. 3a), and observed substantially higher levels of insulin, glucagon and amylin. Next we injected each of these three putative substrates 30 min after treatment with 6bK or vehicle alone (Fig. 3b–d).The 6bK-treated cohorts exhibited significantly stronger blood glucose responses to each of these hormones; mice treated with 6bK experienced hypoglycaemia during insulin tolerance tests (Fig. 3b) and hyperglycaemia following challenges with either amylin24 (Fig. 3c) or glucagon (Fig. 3d) compared to control animals (via non-physiological activation of the Cori cycle, and gluconeogenesis, respectively)24–26. Moreover, in each case the plasma level of the hormone injected remained elevated at the end of the procedure in 6bK-treated mice relative to control animals (Figs 3b–d insets). Collectively these results reveal that IDE regulates the abundance and physiological effects of glucagon and amylin, in addition to insulin.
Amylin is co-secreted with insulin, and is involved in glycaemic control by inhibiting gastric emptying, promoting satiety and antagonizing glucagon secretion24, 25. Pramlintide (Symlin) is a synthetic amylin derivative used clinically to control post-prandial glucose levels20, 21. To determine the effects of IDE inhibition on endogenous amylin signalling, we measured gastric emptying efficiency, an amylin-mediated process25. Mice treated with 6bK exhibited twofold slower gastric emptying compared to vehicle and bisepi-6bK-treated controls (Fig. 3e). Importantly, co-administration of AC187, a 25-mer peptide amylin receptor antagonist25, blocked the effects of 6bK on gastric emptying (Fig. 3e). Collectively, these data reveal that IDE inhibition can slow post-prandial gastric emptying by modulating amylin signalling in vivo at physiologically relevant levels. Amylin-mediated effects on gastric emptying and satiety have been recognized to have therapeutic relevance20, 21, and our results demonstrate a small-molecule-based strategy to modulate amylin signalling (Extended Data Fig. 10).
Higher glucagon levels on 6bK treatment provide a possible explanation for impaired glucose tolerance during IPGTT experiments. Substrates are processed by IDE at rates dependent on their relative concentrations (Supplementary Discussion). We observed two- to four-fold higher insulin levels during OGTTs than IPGTTs, consistent with the incretin effect16–19 (Extended Data Fig. 6). During an OGTT, IDE inhibition therefore results primarily in an increase in insulin signalling and lower blood glucose levels. In contrast, during an IPGTT, insulin secretion levels are lower16–19, IDE processes proportionally more glucagon, and the loss of IDE activity thus results in higher glucagon and glucose levels (Figs 2d, e and 3a; Supplementary Discussion)16–19.
To test this hypothesis, we repeated the glucose tolerance experiments using Gcgr−/− mice that lack the G-protein-coupled glucagon receptor (Fig. 3f and g)26. Treatment of Gcgr−/− mice with 6bK followed by an OGTT resulted in improved glucose tolerance as expected (Fig. 3f), consistent with a model in which insulin signalling in these mice is intact and regulated by IDE. In contrast, glucose tolerance in Gcgr−/− mice following IPGTT was not impaired by 6bK treatment, consistent with a model in which glucagon signalling is responsible for driving higher glucose levels in wild-type mice on IDE inhibition during IPGTTs (compare Figs 3g and 2d). In addition, 6bK treatment augmented the expression of liver gluconeogenic markers regulated by endogenous glucagon signalling following a pyruvate injection (Supplementary Discussion, Extended Data Fig. 9). These results collectively show that the ability of IDE to regulate glucagon in vivo can account for the impaired glucose tolerance observed during IPGTTs (see the Supplementary Discussion on the hyperglycaemic rebound phase in DIO mice).
The discovery and application of the physiologically active IDE inhibitor 6bK reveals that transient IDE inhibition can improve glucose tolerance under conditions that mimic the intake of a meal. In the context of recent genetics studies identifying IDE as a diabetes susceptibility gene3, 4, our findings establish the potential of IDE as a target for the treatment of diabetes1, 2. Our study also reveals a new requirement for therapeutic strategies that target IDE—namely, that transient IDE inhibition during meals, rather than chronic treatment, is desirable to minimize elevation of glucagon signalling (Extended Data Fig. 10)21, 27. Plausible pharmacological strategies to circumvent elevation of postprandial glucagon levels include: (1) development of fast- and short-acting pre-meal IDE inhibitors21; (2) combination therapy of an IDE inhibitor with glucagon-lowering incretin therapies20, 21; and (3) co-administration with glucagon receptor antagonists27. Moreover, existing anti-diabetic therapeutics when co-administered with an IDE inhibitor may result in synergistic effects28; indeed 6bK treatment results in stronger improvement in oral glucose tolerance when co-administered with the DPP4 inhibitor sitagliptin (Extended Data Fig. 8)19, 20. In addition, the IDE•6b structure raises the possibility of developing IDE inhibitors that selectively impede insulin degradation without affecting glucagon degradation. These findings collectively inform and motivate additional studies to progress these discoveries towards new diabetes therapeutics.
METHODS SUMMARY
The in vitro selection of the DNA-templated library8 used 20 µg His6-tagged mouse IDE immobilized on cobalt magnetic beads (Invitrogen). IDE inhibition was assayed using the fluorogenic peptide Mca-RPPGFSAFK(Dnp)-OH (R&D), confirmed using an anti-insulin antibody time-resolved FRET assay (Cysbio), and a LCMS assay for CGRP cleavage fragments in plasma9. Macrocyclic inhibitors were synthesized by Fmoc-based solid-phase synthesis and purified by HPLC. LCMS quantitation of 6bK in biological samples was performed using 6bK synthesized with 13C6,15N2 lysine (Sigma-Aldrich).
Wild-type lean and DIO C57BL/6J age-matched male mice (Jackson Laboratories) were used at 14–16, and 24–26 weeks respectively (> 20 weeks of high-fat diet). Gcgr−/− and Ide−/− mice were fully backcrossed to the C57BL/6J line, bred from heterozygous mice, and used between 11 and 21 weeks. Animals were fasted overnight 14 h for all experiments, except for the insulin tolerance test, which required 5 h of fasting during the morning. Blood glucose was measured from tail nicks using AccuCheck (Aviva) meters. Trunk blood was obtained for plasma hormone measurements using the Multiplexed Mouse Metabolic Hormone panel (Milliplex, EMD Millipore) on a Luminex FlexMap 3D instrument.
Extended Data
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by NIH/NIGMS (R01 GM065865 (D.R.L.), R00 GM080097 (M.A.S.), R01 GM81539 (W.-J.T.), T32 GM008444 (Z.H.F.), F30 CA174152 (Z.H.F.), DP2 OD002374 (A.S.)), Howard Hughes Medical Institute (D.R.L.), Diabetes and Cancer Centers of Albert Einstein College of Medicine (M.J.C.), American Diabetes Association no. 7-11-CD-06 (M.A.L.), Burroughs Wellcome Fund CABS (A.S.), and the Searle Scholars Program(A.S.). The Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ) and the Alfred Bader Fund supported J.P.M. We thank C. Russ and H. Spurling (Broad Institute) and C. Daly (FAS Center for Systems Biology) for DNA sequencing assistance. We are grateful to S. Johnston and C. Mosher (Broad Institute) for 6bK stability measurements. W. Nolte provided mouse IDE, L. McCord purified CF-IDE and Y.-G. Kim performed CGRP cleavage assays. We are grateful to A. Badran, E. Homan, A. M. Lone and M. Leidl (Harvard University) for experimental assistance. We thank B. Kahn and N. Gray for discussions.
Footnotes
Online Content Any additional Methods, Extended Data display items and Source Data are available in the online version of the paper; references unique to these sections appear only in the online paper.
Supplementary Information is available in the online version of the paper.
Author Contributions J.P.M., A.M., Z.H.F., R.E.K. and X.Q.D. performed the experiments. M.A.L. provided the Ide−/− mice. W.-J.T. provided IDE protein for structural studies. M.J.C. supervised the Gcgr−/− studies. M.A.S. supervised the IDE•6b structural studies. A.S. supervised the pharmacological validation of 6bK and the in vivo studies. D.R.L. supervised the discovery of IDE inhibitors, the pharmacological studies and the in vivo studies. All authors analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.
Author Information The coordinates and the structure factors of the IDE•6b complex have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under the accession code 4 LTE. The authors declare competing financial interests: details are available in the online version of the paper. Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of the paper.
References
- 1.Duckworth WC, Bennett RG, Hamel FG. Insulin degradation: progress and potential. Endocr. Rev. 1998;19:608–624. doi: 10.1210/edrv.19.5.0349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mirsky IA, Broh-Kahn RH. The inactivation of insulin by tissue extracts the distribution and properties of insulin inactivating extracts. Arch. Biochem. 1949;20:1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sladek R, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies novel risk loci for type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2007;445:881–885. doi: 10.1038/nature05616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zeggini E, et al. Replication of genome-wide association signals in UK samples reveals risk loci for type 2 diabetes. Science. 2007;316:1336–1341. doi: 10.1126/science.1142364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Farris W, et al. Insulin-degrading enzyme regulates the levels of insulin, amyloid beta-protein, and the beta-amyloid precursor protein intracellular domain in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:4162–4167. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0230450100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Abdul-Hay SO, et al. Deletion of insulin-degrading enzyme elicits antipodal, age-dependent effects on glucose and insulin tolerance. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e20818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gartner ZJ, et al. DNA-templated organic synthesis and selection of a library of macrocycles. Science. 2004;305:1601–1605. doi: 10.1126/science.1102629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tse BN, Snyder TM, Shen Y, Liu DR. Translation of DNA into a library of 13,000 synthetic small-molecule macrocycles suitable for in vitro selection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:15611–15626. doi: 10.1021/ja805649f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim YG, Lone AM, Nolte WM, Saghatelian A. Peptidomics approach to elucidate the proteolytic regulation of bioactive peptides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:8523–8527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203195109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Leissring MA, et al. Designed inhibitors of insulin-degrading enzymeregulate the catabolism and activity of insulin. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Malito E, et al. Molecular bases for the recognition of short peptide substrates and cysteine-directed modifications of human insulin-degrading enzyme. Biochemistry. 2008;47:12822–12834. doi: 10.1021/bi801192h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Malito E, Hulse RE, Tang WJ. Amyloid beta-degrading cryptidases: insulin degrading enzyme, presequence peptidase, and neprilysin. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008;65:2574–2585. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8112-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shen Y, Joachimiak A, Rosner MR, Tang WJ. Structures of human insulin-degrading enzyme reveal a new substrate recognition mechanism. Nature. 2006;443:870–874. doi: 10.1038/nature05143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Manolopoulou M, Guo Q, Malito E, Schilling AB, Tang WJ. Molecular basis of catalytic chamber-assisted unfolding and cleavage of human insulin by human insulin-degrading enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:14177–14188. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900068200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Stella VJ, He Q. Cyclodextrins. Toxicol. Pathol. 2008;36:30–42. doi: 10.1177/0192623307310945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Andrikopoulos S, Blair AR, Deluca N, Fam BC, Proietto J. Evaluating the glucose tolerance test in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008;295:E1323–E1332. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90617.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ahrén B, Winzell MS, Pacini G. The augmenting effect on insulin secretion by oral versus intravenous glucose is exaggerated by high-fat diet in mice. J. Endocrinol. 2008;197:181–187. doi: 10.1677/JOE-07-0460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Winzell MS, Ahren B. The high-fat diet-fed mouse: a model for studying mechanisms and treatment of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2004;53(Suppl 3):S215–S219. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.suppl_3.s215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Drucker DJ. The biology of incretin hormones. Cell Metab. 2006;3:153–165. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Riddle MC, Drucker DJ. Emerging therapies mimicking the effects of amylin and glucagon-like peptide 1. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:435–449. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mooradian AD, Thurman JE. Drug therapy of postprandial hyperglycaemia. Drugs. 1999;57:19–29. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Duckworth WC, Kitabchi AE. Insulin and glucagon degradation by the same enzyme. Diabetes. 1974;23:536–543. doi: 10.2337/diab.23.6.536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bennett RG, Duckworth WC, Hamel FG. Degradation of amylin by insulin-degrading enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:36621–36625. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006170200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Young A. Effects on plasma glucose and lactate. Adv. Pharmacol. 2005;52:193–208. doi: 10.1016/S1054-3589(05)52010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gedulin BR, Jodka CM, Herrmann K, Young AA. Role of endogenous amylin in glucagon secretion and gastric emptying in rats demonstrated with the selective antagonist, AC187. Regul. Pept. 2006;137:121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gelling RW, et al. Lower blood glucose, hyperglucagonemia, and pancreatic alpha cell hyperplasia in glucagon receptor knockout mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:1438–1443. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0237106100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Unger RH, Cherrington AD. Glucagonocentric restructuring of diabetes: a pathophysiologic and therapeutic makeover. J. Clin. Invest. 2012;122:4–12. doi: 10.1172/JCI60016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sadry SA, Drucker DJ. Emerging combinatorial hormone therapies for the treatment of obesity and T2DM. Nature Rev. Endocrinol. 2013;9:425–433. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]