Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2014 Aug 2;65(17):5023–5032. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru284

Phosphate depletion modulates auxin transport in Triticum aestivum leading to altered root branching

Peter J Talboys 1,*, John R Healey 1, Paul J A Withers 1, Davey L Jones 1
PMCID: PMC4144783  PMID: 25086590

Summary

When grown in a low-phosphate environment Triticum aestivum showed reduced basipetal auxin transport and altered root PIN and AUX/IAA expression profiles, with a concurrent reduction in root branching density.

Key words: AUX/IAA, auxin, lateral root, phosphate, PIN, polar auxin transport, wheat.

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms by which nutritional signals impact upon root system architecture is a key facet in the drive for greater nutrient application efficiency in agricultural systems. Cereal plants reduce their rate of lateral root emergence under inorganic phosphate (Pi) shortage; this study uses molecular and pharmacological techniques to dissect this Pi response in Triticum aestivum. Plants were grown in coarse sand washed in high- or low-Pi nutrient solution before being assessed for their root branching density and expression of AUX/IAA and PIN genes. Seedlings were also grown on media containing [14C]indole acetic acid to measure basipetal auxin transport. Seedlings grown in low-Pi environments displayed less capacity to transport auxin basipetally from the seminal root apex, a reduction in root expression of PIN auxin transporter genes, and perturbed expression of a range of AUX/IAA auxin response genes. Given the known importance of basipetally transported auxin in stimulating lateral root initiation, it is proposed here that, in T. aestivum, Pi availability directly influences lateral root production through modulation of PIN expression. Understanding such processes is important in the drive for greater efficiency in crop use of Pi fertilizers in agricultural settings.

Introduction

The plasticity of root system architecture in response to environmental cues is a crucial component of a plant’s nutrient foraging capacity. The production of lateral root branches is genetically controlled and may increase root surface area in nutrient-rich soil (Drew, 1975; Linkohr et al., 2002), or enable the exploration of a greater soil volume by lateral growth through the topsoil in nutrient-poor soil (Linkohr et al., 2002; Zhu and Lynch, 2004). An example of this process is the acquisition of inorganic phosphate (Pi), in which the production of lateral roots is crucial for Pi accumulation in some plants (Lynch, 2011). The factors controlling root branching to form new lateral roots are therefore of great interest, and are the focus of this study.

Phosphate is an essential plant nutrient required for photosynthesis and a key building block in biological molecules such as nucleic acids and phospholipids. The concentrations of Pi in soil solution are, however, typically very low, due to Pi’s propensity to bind strongly to soil surfaces or form insoluble complexes with cations (Norman and Hemwall, 1957). This means that Pi is often a limiting factor in plant growth and development. This has resulted in a large number of developmental traits amongst plant species that can enhance Pi uptake. Physiologically these include the modulation of root elongation (Sánchez-Calderón et al., 2005), branching (Linkohr et al., 2002; López-Bucio et al., 2002), and root hair density (Ma et al., 2001). The root system may also act to enhance Pi uptake by exuding protons (Hinsinger, 2001), organic acid anions (Ryan et al., 2001), and phosphatases (Tadano and Sakai, 1991) into the rhizosphere, or by the formation of symbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizas or ectomycorrhizas (Péret et al., 2011; Smith et al., 2011). Understanding the mechanisms controlling these traits is therefore of great importance in the pursuit of improved crop Pi uptake. The wheat crop is a major source of cereal for the world’s expanding population, and this work investigates the response of the root system of the crop plant spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) to Pi deficiency.

Work on the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana has been very successful in determining the sequence of molecular and cellular processes behind lateral root production. Primed pericycle founder cells, formed in the basal root meristem and located opposite xylem poles (Dolan et al., 1993), undergo several rounds of ordered asymmetric cell division to form dome-shaped lateral root primordia (LRP) which then emerge from the parent root (Dubrovsky et al., 2001, 2008, 2011; De Smet et al., 2006; De Rybel et al., 2010; Moreno-Risueno et al., 2010). The spatial distribution of lateral root production is a tightly controlled process, in which the phytohormone auxin plays a key role.

At the root apex, auxin distribution is tightly controlled by the differential expression and subcellular localization of the AUXIN RESISTANT (AUX) and PIN-FORMED (PIN) auxin carrier proteins which mediate influx and efflux, respectively, in a process known as polar auxin transport (PAT) (Palme and Gälweiler, 1999). The protein AtPIN1 unloads leaf-derived auxin from the vascular tissue into the root apical meristem (RAM) (Gälweiler et al., 1998), where AtPIN3, AtPIN4, and AtPIN7 proceed to create auxin maxima in both the quiescent centre cells at the heart of the RAM and in the collumella root cap distal to it (Friml et al., 2002a , b, 2003). The expression of AtPIN2 and AtAUX1 in lateral root cap cells and AtPIN2 epidermal cells then drives a basal flow of auxin on the root periphery (Müller et al., 1998). This basipetal transport of auxin in the lateral root cap and epidermis is crucial for auxin accumulation in the basal portion of the RAM. This is the driver of both gravitrophism (Abas et al., 2006) and, importantly for this study, lateral root formation (Casimiro et al., 2001; De Smet et al., 2006). In the basal RAM, basipetally transported auxin accumulates in groups of pericycle cells, which have been specified by oscillating gene expression, to and from primed pericycle founder cells (Dubrovsky et al., 2001, 2008, 2011; De Smet et al., 2006; De Rybel et al., 2010; Moreno-Risueno et al., 2010). These founder cells retain many cytological features characteristic of meristematic cells (dense cytoplasm, large nuclei, and small vacuoles) and maintain a level of multipotency whilst the remainder of the root tissue differentiates around them (Dubrovsky et al., 2008; Parizot et al., 2008). Genes related to the cell cycle are subsequently triggered in these founder cells, and so the cell division events which drive the formation of LRPs are also induced by auxin (Himanen, 2002; Himanen et al., 2004; Dubrovsky et al., 2008).

The majority of auxin signal transduction is known to require three major protein components: AUX/IAA transcriptional repressors (Abel and Theologis, 1996), AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) transcriptional activators (Guilfoyle and Hagen, 2007), and the Skp1-cullin-F box protein E3 ubiquitin ligase (SCF) and its F box component TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE 1 (TIR1) (Dharmasiri et al., 2005; Kepinski and Leyser, 2005). Briefly, in the absence of auxin, AUX/IAAs bind to ARFs and prevent them from activating transcription of auxin-responsive genes. Auxin acts as a molecular glue, stabilizing the direct interaction between TIR1 and the AUX/IAA (Dharmasiri et al., 2005; Kepinski and Leyser, 2005). This enables the SCF complex to ubiquitinate the AUX/IAA, targeting it for degradation (Gray et al., 2001), and thus allows the ARF to activate transcription (Dharmasiri et al., 2005; Kepinski and Leyser, 2005). Auxin signalling also involves a reverse feedback loop, whereby AUX/IAA genes are among those whose expression is activated by ARFs: thus auxin signal transduction is a tightly restricted process, and AUX/IAA expression correlates well with increased auxin concentrations (Vanneste and Friml, 2009). A number of AUX/IAA genes have been linked to lateral root initiation and development in Arabidopsis: AtIAA28 regulates founder cell specification (De Rybel et al., 2010), AtIAA14 regulates the asymmetric divisions that form the first committed steps in lateral root production (De Smet et al., 2010), and AtIAA12 and AtIAA13 also participate in lateral root development subsequent to AtIAA14 (Goh et al., 2012).

Greater production of lateral roots has been shown to increase Pi acquisition efficiency substantially (Zhu and Lynch, 2004), and there is a variation amongst plant species in how lateral root production is used to maximize Pi uptake in low-Pi environments (Niu et al., 2013). Arabidopsis, Brassica nigra, and Hordeum vulgare root systems have been reported to respond to homogeneously low-Pi environments by promotion of lateral growth at the expense of vertical growth (Linkohr et al., 2002; Huang et al., 2008). Here the primary RAM terminally differentiates (Sánchez-Calderón et al., 2005), resulting in the cessation of root growth, and an increase in the frequency of lateral root initiation and lateral root elongation (Linkohr et al., 2002; López-Bucio et al., 2002). However, conflicting reports demonstrate that, subsequent to longer term exposure to low Pi conditions, Arabidopsis, H. vulgare, and Phaseolus vulgaris root systems show reductions in lateral root branching density (Drew, 1975; Borch et al., 1999; Nacry et al., 2005). In Arabidopsis, this temporal contrast is proposed to be caused by low Pi conditions stimulating the emergence of existing LRPs, yet reducing the overall number of primordia generated (Nacry et al., 2005). A contrast can, however, be drawn between Arabidopsis and H. vulgare in their reactions to localized areas of high soil Pi: Arabidopsis shows no branching response to these Pi patches (Linkohr et al., 2002), whereas H. vulgare responds by significantly increasing branching frequency (Drew, 1975). This difference between the branching responses of these dicot and monocot species to Pi supply highlight the potential hazards of extrapolating developmental responses to nutrient availability between species that differ in their morphology, physiology, and phylogenetic history. Monocot cereals have a fine fibrous root system composed of multiple seminal and crown roots, rather than a tap root. This results in greater exploration of the topsoil than in the tap root system of the model plant Arabidopsis; therefore, the cereal root system as a whole encounters a more diverse range of nutritional environments (Hodge, 2009). This is especially important for Pi given its lack of mobility in soil solution.

This study uses spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) as a model to investigate how cereal root systems respond to variable Pi availability at a molecular and physiological level. This crop was selected because of its agronomic importance, the inaccuracy of extrapolating responses between species, and the lack of studies focused on the molecular mechanisms behind such processes in cereals. Despite its crucial role in global food production, the complex nature of the T. aestivum genome means that, until recently, very few studies have focused on the molecular basis of its developmental plasticity.

Materials and methods

Growing conditions

Triticum aestivum L. (cv. Paragon) seeds were surface-sterilized for 5min in a solution containing 10% Na hypochlorite and 0.01% Tween-20 (w/v). These seeds were then germinated on autoclaved tissue paper, moistened with sterile de-ionized water, for 3 d. The resulting seedlings were then planted in 50ml polypropylene tubes filled with autoclaved, washed quartz sand, and the whole system was watered to field capacity with an adapted Hoagland’s nutrient solution (Hoagland and Arnon, 1950). Water losses due to plant uptake and evaporation reduced the water content of the sand by around one-third over 24h; therefore, it is unlikely that flooding of the root system could be a confounding factor. Sand culture was used to minimize solid phase phosphorus interactions and the release of native phosphorus from soil organic matter, and to facilitate recovery of intact root systems. The Hoagland’s solution contained: 5mM KNO3; 5mM Ca(NO3)2; 2mM MgSO4; 765nM ZnSO4; 320nM CuSO4; 46.3 μM H3BO3; 497 μM Na2MoO4; 9.14 μM MnCl2; 1mM NH4NO3; 38.7 μM Fe.EDTA; and either 500 μM KH2PO4 (high-Pi) or 5 μM KH2PO4 and 495 μM KCl (low-Pi) (all Sigma Aldrich, Poole, UK). The solution pH was adjusted to 6.0 and autoclaved before use. Solutions containing the synthetic auxin 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and the PAT inhibitor 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA) (both Sigma Aldrich) were 0.2 μm filter sterilized and then applied to the nutrient solution after autoclaving. 2,4-D was used rather than the endogenously produced auxin indole acetic acid (IAA) due to its increased stability over the time span of the experiment. The tubes were kept in a climate-controlled cabinet at 20 °C, 70% humidity, 16h/8h day/night cycle, and light intensity (PAR) of 500 μmol m–2 s–1, with a randomized layout. The tubes were re-watered daily to field capacity with the relevant nutrient solution. Seven days after planting (10 d after germination), the tubes were emptied and the roots were washed to remove any sand prior to subsequent analysis. Depending upon the experiment, the root systems were then either assayed for their lateral root branching density and longest lateral root length, or 3cm lengths of five seminal roots and five lateral roots per sample were frozen in liquid N2 for future quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis. Root branching frequency was assayed on washed roots by first measuring the distance between the oldest and the newest, emerged, lateral root, and then counting the frequency of lateral root branches from the seminal root axis. Only the longest seminal root of the 3–5 present per plant was used. The longest lateral root length was determined using a ruler. The initial seminal root growth rate was measured under the same conditions as described above: each seedling’s seminal roots were, however, measured prior to planting, and then seedlings were harvested 24h later and the seminal roots re-measured to find the daily growth rate. All statistical significance testing was performed using Student’s t-test on MS Excel.

Quantitative reverse transcription–PCR (RT–PCR)

RNA was extracted from the liquid N2-frozen harvested roots. Briefly, the first 1cm of root tip was excised using a scalpel and 10 root tips were pooled per extract. Each root tip was excised from a separate plant, and each pool of 10 was treated as one biological replicate. These were flash-frozen in liquid N2 and then the RNA was extracted, using a GeneMATRIX RNA/miRNA purification kit (Roboklon, Berlin, Germany) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The dART RT kit (Roboklon) was then used to construct cDNA from this RNA extract using oligo d(T) primers. The target genes for qPCR analysis were obtained by performing a tblastn search of both the NCBI and the TIGR online databases using the protein sequences of AtPIN2 and AtIAA2. These sequences are referred to herein as: IAA2 (GenBank: CK213604), IAA3 (GenBank: CK170519), IAA4 (GenBank: CK163783), IAA5 (GenBank: BI751049), IAA6 (GenBank: AK332471), IAA7 (GenBank: AK331670), IAA8 (GenBank: AK330790), PIN3 (GenBank: CK208792), and PIN4 (GenBank: CK208849). These candidates, alongside the previously uploaded sequences of IAA1 (GenBank: AJ575098), PIN1 (GenBank: AY496058), and PIN2 (BK005137), were assessed to ensure that they all contained characteristic PIN or AUX/IAA domains (Supplementary Figs S1, S2 available at JXB online) by first using the ExPASy translate tool (web.expasy.org) to determine their amino acid sequences, aligning them using MUSCLE (www.ebi.ac.uk), then using TMPred (Hofmann and Stoffel, 1993) to predict transmembrane helices. Primers were designed using the NCBI primer blast tool (Supplementary Table S1), produced by Eurofins (Eurofins MWG-Operon, Ebersberg, Germany), and tested for specificity by performing standard PCR on cDNA extracts and performing electrophoresis on agarose gels. Quantitative RT–PCR was performed using a thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies Ltd, Paisley, UK) and SYBR Green qPCR mix (Roboklon), and normalized to actin (GenBank: AB181991) and tubulin (GenBank: U76558) controls performed using primer pairs published by Teng et al. (2013) and Zhang et al. (2012). Normalization was performed by dividing the relative expression values for each sample by the square root of the product of that sample’s actin and tubulin relative expression values. A further set of quantitative RT–PCR assays were performed on cDNA extracted from the root tissue of plants submerged in high-Pi media ±1 μM 2,4-D for 1h, having been grown to 10 d after germination as above, to ensure that their expression showed the auxin-responsive increase in transcription expected of AUX/IAA genes (Supplementary Fig. S3). All statistical significance testing was performed using Student’s t-test on MS Excel.

[14C]IAA transport assays

PAT assays were conducted by a method adapted from Mishra et al. (2009). Seeds were surface-sterilized as previously described, and then germinated in Petri dishes containing the high-Pi Hoagland’s solution (described above) solidified with 10% Agar agar (Sigma Aldrich). Environmental conditions were as described earlier. Split Petri dishes were then created, with one half containing high or low-Pi Hoagland–agar medium previously described, and the other half containing either high- or low-Pi Hoagland–agar medium supplemented with 50nM of the endogenous auxin IAA labelled with 14C (American Radiolabelled Chemicals Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA). Two days after germination, seedlings were transferred to these split plates so that the first 1mm of the longest seminal root’s tip was in contact with the agar containing [14 C]IAA, with a 1mm gap between the [14C]IAA-containing agar and the non-radioactive agar with which the remainder of the root, and root system was in contact. The [14C]IAA-containing agar did not contact the non-radioactive agar. These seedlings were left for 1h at 20 °C. The roots were then dissected so that 2×2mm sections were taken from immediately behind the 1mm that was in contact with the agar containing [14C]IAA. These sections were oven dried at 105 °C for 24h, and their 14C content was then determined with an OX-400 Biological Sample Oxidizer (RJ Harvey Instrument Corp., Hillsdale, NJ, USA) with the 14CO2 evolved collected in Oxosol scintillation fluid (National Diagnostics, Hessle, UK). Four root sections were pooled per replicate to ensure a sufficient 14C signal, with three such replicates performed per treatment. 14C was then quantified using a Wallac 1404 scintillation counter (Wallac EG&G, Milton Keynes, UK). The ratio of [14 C]IAA content between the 2mm section closest to the root tip and the 2mm section immediately basal to it was used as an approximate estimate of relative auxin flow. These values were scaled to be proportionate to the high tip Pi, high basal Pi environments value. Replicates exposed only to agar containing no added [14C]IAA displayed no measurable 14C signal. Statistical significance testing was performed using Student’s t-test on MS Excel, and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in SPSS.

Results

Triticum aestivum branching frequency reduces in low-Pi environments yet remains auxin sensitive

As previously demonstrated for H. vulgare root systems (Drew, 1975), T. aestivum seminal roots produced a lower frequency of lateral roots in low-Pi environments than when exposed to high concentrations of Pi (Fig. 1A, B). Alongside this observation, initial seminal root growth rates were unaffected by environmental Pi supply (Fig. 2A, B, E), whereas low-Pi conditions resulted in a significant limitation in maximum lateral root length (Fig. 2C, D, F).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Triticum aestivum lateral root production in low-Pi is increased by auxin, and Pi-induced root branching requires polar auxin transport. (A–D) Images of T. aestivum roots grown for 7 d in sand culture (10 d after germination) watered with a nutrient solution containing (A, C) 500 μM or (B, D) 5 μM Pi, supplemented with (C, D) 1 μM 2,4-D. Scale bars are 1cm. (E) Frequencies of lateral root branches per millimetre of seminal root axis. Error bars are the standard errors of the mean (SEM), n=47–52, a, b, c, d, and e denote values significantly different from each other using Student’s t-test (P<0.05).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Lateral roots but not seminal roots show reduced length in low-Pi conditions. (A, B) Roots of Triticum aestivum seedlings grown for 3 d in sand culture watered with a nutrient solution containing (A) 500 μM or (B) 5 μM Pi. (C, D) T. aestivum roots grown for 10 d in washed sand watered with a nutrient solution containing (C) 500 μM or (D) 5 μM Pi. (E) Seminal root growth rates of seedlings from A and B. (F) Longest lateral root lengths found after 10 d growth in sand in a nutrient solution containing 500 μM Pi (high-Pi) or 5 μM Pi (low-Pi). Error bars are the SEM (n=15 for seminal root growth rates, n=45 root systems for longest lateral root assay). Letters indicate significant differences between high and low-Pi values using Student’s t-test (P<0.05).

Seedlings grown in low-Pi media supplemented with 1 μM 2,4-D demonstrated a significant recovery in root branching frequency, demonstrating that they retained the capacity to respond to exogenous auxin (Fig. 1C, D). Interestingly, seedlings grown under high-Pi and at this dosage of 2,4-D demonstrated a drastic reduction in lateral root elongation, a characteristic of auxin application, whereas the low-Pi+2,4-D seedlings showed levels of lateral root elongation more similar to the no auxin controls (Fig. 1A, B). The inclusion of 100 μM TIBA (an auxin transport inhibitor) in the growth media showed that inhibition of auxin transport could severely reduce lateral root outgrowth (Fig. 1E), a similar response to that found in other plant species (Karabaghli-Degron et al., 1998). The 1, 5, and 50 μM TIBA treatments allowed lateral root outgrowth, whilst also showing no significant effect of environmental Pi concentration on lateral root density. Therefore these data suggest that unimpeded PAT is required for Pi-mediated modulation of lateral root density.

Expression of putative AUX/IAA genes is perturbed in response to environmental Pi

Bioinformatic analyses identified eight matches with predicted protein sequences with a highly similarity to the AtIAA2 probe used. These sequences all demonstrated domains III and IV characteristic of AUX/IAA sequences, and either also possessed domains I and II or were incomplete sequences (Supplementary Fig. S2 at JXB online). Expression levels of three of the seven identified potential AUX/IAA genes were significantly altered by the Pi status of the growth media (Fig. 3). The expression of IAA1, IAA4, and IAA7 was significantly up-regulated under low-Pi conditions (Fig. 3), which contrasts with the reduced sensitivity of root elongation to exogenous auxin (Fig. 1C, D). However, the expression of IAA3 was significantly reduced under low Pi.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Expression of AUX/IAA genes is altered in response to environmental Pi. Relative expression levels of AUX/IAA gene candidates in Triticum aestivum seedlings grown in either low-Pi (5 μM) or high-Pi (500 μM). Each sample was normalized for actin and tubulin expression as detailed in the Materials and methods, and expression of AUX/IAA genes is plotted as a value relative to each gene’s high-Pi value. Values are the averages of three biological replicates (10 pooled root tips per replicate), with each of these being a pooled average of three experimental replicates. Error bars are the SEM (n=3). Asterisks indicate where low-Pi values are significantly different from the high-Pi values within each gene using Student’s t-test (P<0.05).

Basipetal auxin flow is reduced under phosphorus starvation, as is the expression of putative PINs

Radiolabelled [14C]IAA was used to assess the root’s capacity to transport auxin basipetally from the root apex. The results in Fig. 4A show that there was a significant reduction in basipetal auxin flow when the root tip was in contact with low-Pi medium compared with that containing high-Pi, whatever the basal medium Pi content. Furthermore, two-way ANOVA shows that both root tip Pi supply and basal root Pi supply have significant impacts on this measure of basipetal auxin flow, with a significant interaction between the two factors (P<0.001).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Polar auxin transport and expression of candidate genes for PIN-FORMED (PIN) auxin carrier proteins are down-regulated in low Pi. (A) Relative IAA transport rates measured by using a [14C]IAA label for Triticum aestivum seedlings with root tips in contact with either low-Pi (5 μM) or high-Pi (500 μM) media, and the rest of the root system in contact with non-[14C]IAA-containing low-Pi (5 μM) or high-Pi (500 μM) media. The 14C content of 2mm root sections starting 1mm from the root apex, divided by the 14C content of 2mm root sections starting 3mm from the root apex, expressed as a proportion of the high Pi controls. Values are the average of three biological replicates (four pooled roots from distinct organisms per replicate). Error bars are the standard errors (n=3). Letters indicate values significantly different from each other using Student’s t-test (P<0.05); two-way ANOVA determined that both tip phosphorus, basal phosphorus, and the interaction between the two had significant effects on the results (P<0.001). (B) Relative expression levels of PIN gene candidates in T. aestivum seedlings grown in either low-Pi (5 μM) or high-Pi (500 μM) media. Each sample was normalized for actin and tubulin expression as detailed in the Materials and methods, and plotted as a value relative to each gene’s high-Pi value. Values are the averages of three biological replicates (10 pooled root tips per replicate), with each of these being a pooled average of three experimental replicates. Error bars are the SEM (n=3). Asterisks indicate where the low-Pi value is significantly different from the high-Pi value within each gene using Student’s t-test (P<0.05).

In the database searches for PIN auxin transporter sequences, two new sequences, and the previously annotated TaPIN1 and TaPIN2, which had predicted amino acid sequences that were highly similar to the AtPIN2 probe sequence used, were identified. Quantitative RT–PCR measurements made on these sequences also showed reduced expression of PIN3 and PIN4 in seedlings grown in low-Pi media (Fig. 4B; Supplementary Fig. S1 at JXB online). This down-regulation of PIN gene expression, coupled with the reduction in [14C]IAA flow, provides evidence that auxin transport capacity was significantly altered in T. aestivum roots in response to low-Pi environments.

Discussion

Auxin fluxes in the root tip are affected by Pi availability, potentially driving alterations in root branching

The results presented herein shed new light on how T. aestivum roots integrate phosphorus availability into the processes driving lateral root production. Auxin is well established as a key component in the control of lateral root production. The basal flow of auxin in the lateral root cap and epidermis, and its subsequent accumulation in pericycle founder cells, is thought to drive lateral root branching and elongation (Dubrovsky et al., 2001, 2008; De Smet et al., 2006), with disruption of this process inhibiting lateral root production (Fig. 1E; Casimiro et al., 2001).

The results in Fig. 4A demonstrate that when T. aestivum roots are in a low-Pi environment the basal auxin flow is greatly reduced, and this potentially causes the reduced lateral root density observed in Fig. 1A. Root tip contact with low-Pi environments has previously been shown to have the capacity to drive the remodelling of a plant’s root system architecture (Svistoonoff et al., 2007). The alterations in the root expression profile of AUX/IAA genes caused by the level of Pi supply shown in the present study (Fig. 3) point to a remodelling of the auxin response profile within the root system. The experiments performed here demonstrate a modulation of basipetal PAT, and the transcriptional regulation of TaPIN genes, which could potentially produce this altered auxin response profile. There are several downstream steps where PAT could be modulated further, such as PIN endosomal cycling (Geldner et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2010) or MDR/PGP–PIN interaction (Blakeslee et al., 2007). However, the results in Fig. 4A provide evidence that there is a net effect of environmental Pi level on PAT when perceived both at the root apex and in basal portions of the root. These experiments do not provide evidence of how this effect of PIN transcription is enacted. However, given that a measurable difference in auxin flow occurs in previously Pi-sufficient plants within 1h, the implication is that a signalling process produces this effect rather than a more long-term nutrient shortage response.

The Pi–PAT interaction demonstrated in the present study adds to the Pi–auxin interactions previously documented in other species. Auxin sensitivity modulation in response to Pi status has been previously demonstrated to occur in Arabidopsis roots by up-regulation of TIR1 auxin receptor expression (Pérez Torres et al., 2009). This is proposed to cause the increased lateral root and root hair density and reduced primary root growth characterized by the low-Pi response in Arabidopsis (Ma et al., 2001). Given the importance of root hair production in phosphorus uptake (Bates and Lynch, 2001; Zhu et al., 2010), it would be beneficial for the plant’s nutrition for the control of root hair plasticity to continue unabated under low-Pi conditions. In T. aestivum a reduction of basipetal PAT in low-Pi conditions is shown (Fig. 4A), yet previous experiments have demonstrated no effect of varying Pi conditions on root hair density (Ewens and Leigh, 1985). This could be explained by the spatial separation of the basal meristem where lateral root founder cells are specified and the differentiated tissues where root hairs are produced. However, the scarcity of information on Pi effects on T. aestivum root hair density, due to the large variability in root hair production between cultivars (Wu and He, 2011), hinders making definitive conclusions.

Triticum aestivum Pi scavenging responses differ from those of the model plant Arabidopsis

These experiments also highlight the imprecision of extrapolating nutrient scavenging responses from the model plant Arabidopsis into other species. Previous studies using Arabidopsis and H. vulgare have shown that under low-Pi conditions the primary root meristem undergoes a process of terminal differentiation, whilst the maturation rate of LRPs is enhanced (Linkohr et al., 2002; López-Bucio et al., 2002; Sánchez-Calderón et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2008). Following this, PAT reduces after ~11 d, which could potentially be related to the terminal differentiation of the meristem and root cap, providing a reduction in the density of LRPs and the continued elongation of the remaining emerged lateral roots (Nacry et al., 2005). Ten days after germination in the present study, growth of young T. aestivum seminal roots after germinationcontinued unabated (Fig. 2A, B, E), with significant limitation to maximum lateral root length (Fig. 2C, D, F) and lateral root density (Fig. 1), which is consistent with observations in long-term studies of other crop species (Borch et al., 1999).

Pi is usually found in largest quantities in the topsoil, and therefore enhanced exploration of this area is beneficial to a plant subject to Pi deficiency (Zhu et al., 2005). A short-term enhancement in lateral root production can be an effective method of increasing topsoil exploration, and this is reflected in the increased lateral root production and lateral root growth relative to that of primary roots in low-Pi conditions observed in some studies (Linkohr et al., 2002; Huang et al., 2008). However, in plants with fibrous root systems, such as T. aestivum, the production of a multitude of seminal and crown roots at varying angles from the seed/hypocotyl affords an alternative method of topsoil exploration. This has been demonstrated in Solanum lycopersicum, where low Pi conditions caused a significant increase in the number of adventitious roots in a process mediated by ethylene (Kim et al., 2008). Unfortunately, within the timeline of this study, the number of seminal roots was still very low (3–4) and therefore did not show any significant alterations in number. Nevertheless their presence possibly de-emphasizes the importance of the explorative function of lateral roots, and means that their chief benefit is to modulate the root surface area in response to more local environmental stimuli. A switch to a root system dominated by lateral roots has been shown to enhance Pi uptake efficiency greatly (Zhu and Lynch, 2004); therefore, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind the production of lateral roots is potentially of great importance for both targeted crop breeding and localizing application of fertilizers to improve uptake efficiency.

PIN candidates

This study also presents new insights into the PIN gene family within T. aestivum, identifying candidates from published cDNA libraries and marking expression locations for two family members. PIN proteins are characterized by two hydrophobic domains, each containing five transmembrane helices, connected by a hydrophilic domain presumed to protrude into the cytoplasm (Křeček et al., 2009). The predicted amino acid sequences of the genes used in this study, TaPIN1, TaPIN2, TaPIN3, and TaPIN4, contain the N-terminal hydrophilic domain and the hydrophobic domain, complete with five transmembrane helices, and PIN1 and PIN2 also contain the C-terminal hydrophobic domain (Supplementary Fig. S1 at JXB online). The absence of a C-terminal hydrophobic domain in PIN3 and PIN4 cDNA sequences was attributed to the incomplete nature of the sequences. All the amino acid sequences also each contain two di-acid motifs, involved in trafficking from the endoplasmic reticulum, and a tyrosine-based internalization motif, for recruitment into clathrin-dependent vesicles (Supplementary Fig. S1). Both of these features are characteristic of PIN genes in other species (Chawla and DeMason, 2004; Schnabel and Frugoli, 2004; Křeček et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2011; Watanabe et al., 2012), and so give more credence to the notion that these sequences encode T. aestivum PIN proteins. As only a limited portion of these cDNA sequences is available, it remains unclear as to which subgroup of PIN proteins TaPIN3 and TaPIN4 belong.

AUX/IAA candidates

A study identifying various family members of the AUX/IAA gene family in T. aestivum has already been published (Singla et al., 2006), and the AUX/IAA candidate cDNAs used in Fig. 3 add to this. The methodology used here identified the complete sequence of IAA1 published by Singla et al. (2006) alongside the candidate sequences, but the other results identified in their study did not score as highly using the present methodology. This is perhaps due to the differences between using Oryza sativa AUX/IAA and Arabidopsis AUX/IAA amino acid sequences as the query sequence in the BLAST search. There are four conserved domains that are characteristic of AUX/IAA proteins identified in other organisms (Dharmasiri and Estelle, 2004; Jain et al., 2006) and in T. aestivum (Singla et al., 2006). The amino acid sequences predicted from the candidate cDNAs used in this study all contained domain III and IV, and a STOP codon at the C-terminus. These sequnces all either also contained domain I and II, or were incomplete sequences missing the N-terminal portion of the sequence (Supplementary Fig. S2). The modulation of AUX/IAA expression shown in Fig. 3 is the first example of a Pi-modulated auxin response shift that has been demonstrated in T. aestivum. The conclusion from these data when viewed in conjunction with the [14C]IAA transport data in Fig. 4A is that the alteration in PAT auxin flow causes a corresponding alteration in auxin responses, and therefore AUX/IAA expression levels. Figure 3 shows that IAA3 expression appears to be positively correlated with Pi supply. As Fig. 4A shows that Pi supply significantly influences the basipetal flow of auxin, this may indicate that IAA3 expression is localized to the basal regions of the RAM auxin maximum. However, as mapping the specific locations of AUX/IAA expression is not covered in this study, further work is required to verify this.

Conclusions

The results presented here illustrate that the Pi-dependent modulation of auxin transport, driven by putative PINOID auxin export carrier gene expression, alters the auxin responses at the root tip. This is corroborated by a corresponding alteration in the root tip AUX/IAA expression profile, providing a potential mechanism for the decreased root branching observed in T. aestivum grown in low-Pi environments (Fig. 5). This significantly advances our understanding of the mechanism by which the developmental plasticity of the T. aestivum root system exploits heterogeneous soil environments. This is a potential mechanism for the widely observed phenomenon of localized branching in response to localized hotspots of soil phosporus (i.e. as would occur with banded Pi fertilization). Beyond advancing knowledge of plant biology, these findings have implications for the agricultural sector. Improved understanding of the mechanisms underpinning nutrient-stimulated root branching could improve targeting of agricultural fertilizers to regions where dense root branching is more probable, and highlights molecular mechanisms that could be exploited through plant breeding to improve existing varieties. There has also been a recent trend towards inoculation of agricultural plants with plant growth-promoting microorganisms, including auxin producers (Lugtenberg and Kamilova, 2009). Further understanding of the consequences of exogenous auxin application in crop species is therefore highly desirable. In conclusion, the present findings provide an understanding of the role of auxin in regulating root nutrient responses which should permit the more effective design of agricultural systems through combination of crop breeding and Pi fertilization regimes targeted at enhanced food security and the sustainable intensification of cropping systems.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Environmental Pi modulates basipetal flows in polar auxin transport (PAT) to alter lateral root production. The inverted fountain of PAT (black arrows) creates auxin maxima (grey) at the quiescent centre (QC), root cap, and at founder cells (FC) in the distal meristem. LR, lateral roots; LRP, lateral root primordia. This study shows that low Pi acts through PIN expression to modulate the basipetal portion of this auxin flux.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Figure S1. Sequence alignment of TaPIN3 and TaPIN4 amino acid sequences, displaying functional PIN protein motifs.

Figure S2. Alignment of the amino acid sequences of TaIAA candidates, displaying functional AUX/IAA domains.

Figure S3. AUX/IAA candidate sequence expression is elevated in response to 1h induction with auxin.

Table S1. Primers pairs used for qPCR analysis.

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgements

The authors thank DEFRA, BBSRC, and the Scottish Government for funding this work as a component of the Sustainable Arable LINK project (LK09136).

References

  1. Abas L, Benjamins R, Malenica N, Paciorek T, Wiśniewska J, Wirniewska J, Moulinier-Anzola JC, Sieberer T, Friml J, Luschnig C. 2006. Intracellular trafficking and proteolysis of the Arabidopsis auxin-efflux facilitator PIN2 are involved in root gravitropism. Nature Cell Biology 8, 249–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abel S, Theologis A. 1996. Early genes and auxin action. Plant Physiology 111, 9–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bates TR, Lynch JP. 2001. Root hairs confer a competitive advantage under low phosphorus availability. Plant and Soil 236, 243–250 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blakeslee JJ, Bandyopadhyay A, Lee OR, et al. 2007. Interactions among PIN-FORMED and P-glycoprotein auxin transporters in Arabidopsis . The Plant Cell 19, 131–147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Borch K, Bouma TJ, Lynch JP, Brown KM. 1999. Ethylene: a regulator of root architectural responses to soil phosphorus availability. Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 425–431 [Google Scholar]
  6. Casimiro I, Marchant A, Bhalerao RP, et al. 2001. Auxin transport promotes Arabidopsis lateral root initiation. The Plant Cell 13, 843–852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chawla R, DeMason DA. 2004. Molecular expression of PsPIN1, a putative auxin efflux carrier gene from pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Growth Regulation 44, 1–14 [Google Scholar]
  8. De Rybel B, Vassileva V, Parizot B, et al. 2010. A novel aux/IAA28 signaling cascade activates GATA23-dependent specification of lateral root founder cell identity. Current Biology 20, 1697–1706 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Smet I, Lau S, Voss U, et al. 2010. Bimodular auxin response controls organogenesis in Arabidopsis . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107, 2705–2710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Smet I, Vanneste S, Inzé D, Beeckman T. 2006. Lateral root initiation or the birth of a new meristem. Plant Molecular Biology 60, 871–887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dharmasiri N, Dharmasiri S, Estelle M. 2005. The F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 435, 441–445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dharmasiri N, Estelle M. 2004. Auxin signaling and regulated protein degradation. Trends in Plant Science 9, 302–308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dolan L, Janmaat K, Willemsen V, Linstead P, Poethig S, Roberts K, Scheres B. 1993. Cellular organisation of the Arabidopsis thaliana root. Development 119, 71–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Drew MC. 1975. Comparison of the effects of a localised supply of phosphate, nitrate, ammonium and potassium on the growth of the seminal root system, and the shoot in barley. New Phytologist 75, 479–490 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dubrovsky JG, Napsucialy-Mendivil S, Duclercq J, Cheng Y, Shishkova S, Ivanchenko MG, Friml J, Murphy AS, Benková E. 2011. Auxin minimum defines a developmental window for lateral root initiation. New Phytologist 191, 970–983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dubrovsky JG, Rost TL, Colón-Carmona A, Doerner P. 2001. Early primordium morphogenesis during lateral root initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana . Planta 214, 30–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dubrovsky JG, Sauer M, Napsucialy-Mendivil S, Ivanchenko MG, Friml J, Shishkova S, Celenza J, Benková E. 2008. Auxin acts as a local morphogenetic trigger to specify lateral root founder cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105, 8790–8794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ewens MA, Leigh RA. 1985. The effect of nutrient solution composition on the length of root hairs of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 36, 713–724 [Google Scholar]
  19. Friml J, Benková E, Blilou I, et al. 2002a. AtPIN4 mediates sink-driven auxin gradients and root patterning in Arabidopsis . Cell 108, 661–673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Friml J, Vieten A, Sauer M, Weijers D, Schwarz H, Hamann T, Offringa R, Jürgens G. 2003. Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical–basal axis of Arabidopsis . Nature 426, 147–153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Friml J, Wiśniewska J, Benková E, Mendgen K, Palme K. 2002b. Lateral relocation of auxin efflux regulator PIN3 mediates tropism in Arabidopsis . Nature 415, 806–809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gälweiler L, Guan C, Müller A, Wisman E, Mendgen K, Yephremov A, Palme K. 1998. Regulation of polar auxin transport by AtPIN1 in Arabidopsis vascular tissue. Science 282, 2226–2230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Geldner N, Friml J, Stierhof YD, Jürgens G, Palme K. 2001. Auxin transport inhibitors block PIN1 cycling and vesicle trafficking. Nature 413, 425–428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Goh T, Kasahara H, Mimura T, Kamiya Y, Fukaki H. 2012. Multiple AUX/IAA–ARF modules regulate lateral root formation: the role of Arabidopsis SHY2/IAA3-mediated auxin signalling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367, 1461–1468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gray WM, Kepinski S, Rouse D, Leyser O, Estelle M. 2001. Auxin regulates SCF(TIR1)-dependent degradation of AUX/IAA proteins. Nature 414, 271–276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Guilfoyle TJ, Hagen G. 2007. Auxin response factors. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10, 453–460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Himanen K. 2002. Auxin-mediated cell cycle activation during early lateral root initiation. The Plant Cell 14, 2339–2351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Himanen K, Vuylsteke M, Vanneste S, Vercruysse S, Boucheron E, Alard P, Chriqui D, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Beeckman T. 2004. Transcript profiling of early lateral root initiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101, 5146–5151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hinsinger P. 2001. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant and Soil 237, 173–195 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil . Circular. California Agricultural Experiment Station 347. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hodge A. 2009. Root decisions. Plant, Cell and Environment 32, 628–640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hofmann K, Stoffel W. 1993. TMBASE—a database of membrane spanning protein segments. Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler 374, 166 [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang CY, Roessner U, Eickmeier I, Genc Y, Callahan DL, Shirley N, Langridge P, Bacic A. 2008. Metabolite profiling reveals distinct changes in carbon and nitrogen metabolism in phosphate-deficient barley plants (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant and Cell Physiology 49, 691–703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang F, Zago MK, Abas L, van Marion A, Galván-Ampudia CS, Offringa R. 2010. Phosphorylation of conserved PIN motifs directs Arabidopsis PIN1 polarity and auxin transport. The Plant Cell 22, 1129–1142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jain M, Kaur N, Garg R, Thakur JK, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. 2006. Structure and expression analysis of early auxin-responsive Aux/IAA gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). Functional and Integrative Genomics 6, 47–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Karabaghli-Degron C, Sotta B, Bonnet M, Gay G, Le Tacon F. 1998. The auxin transport inhibitor 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA) inhibits the stimulation of in vitro lateral root formation and the colonization of the tap-root cortex of Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings by the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor . New Phytologist 140, 723–733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kepinski S, Leyser O. 2005. The Arabidopsis F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 435, 446–451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim H, Lynch JP, Brown KM. 2008. Ethylene insensitivity impedes a subset of responses to phosphorus deficiency in tomato and petunia. Plant, Cell and Environment 31, 1744–1755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Křeček P, Skupa P, Libus J, Naramoto S, Tejos R, Friml J, Zazímalová E. 2009. The PIN-FORMED (PIN) protein family of auxin transporters. Genome Biology 10, 249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Linkohr BI, Williamson LC, Fitter AH, Leyser HMO. 2002. Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture of Arabidopsis . The Plant Journal 29, 751–760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. López-Bucio J, Hernández-Abreu E, Sánchez-Calderón L, Nieto-Jacobo MF, Simpson J, Herrera-Estrella L. 2002. Phosphate availability alters architecture and causes changes in hormone sensitivity in the Arabidopsis root system. Plant Physiology 129, 244–256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F. 2009. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology 63, 541–556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lynch JP. 2011. Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops. Plant Physiology 156, 1041–1049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ma Z, Bielenberg DG, Brown KM, Lynch JP. 2001. Regulation of root hair density by phosphorus availability in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant, Cell and Environment 24, 459–467 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mishra BS, Singh M, Aggrawal P, Laxmi A. 2009. Glucose and auxin signaling interaction in controlling Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings root growth and development. PLoS One 4, e4502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Moreno-Risueno MA, Van Norman JM, Moreno A, Zhang J, Ahnert SE, Benfey PN. 2010. Oscillating gene expression determines competence for periodic Arabidopsis root branching. Science 329, 1306–1311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Müller A, Guan C, Gälweiler L, Tänzler P, Huijser P, Marchant A, Parry G, Bennett M, Wisman E, Palme K. 1998. AtPIN2 defines a locus of Arabidopsis for root gravitropism control. EMBO Journal 17, 6903–6911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nacry P, Canivenc G, Muller B, Azmi A, Van Onckelen H, Rossignol M, Doumas P. 2005. A role for auxin redistribution in the responses of the root system architecture to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiology 138, 2061–2074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Niu YF, Chai RS, Jin GL, Wang H, Tang CX, Zhang YS. 2013. Responses of root architecture development to low phosphorus availability: a review. Annals of Botany 112, 391–408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Norman AG, Hemwall JB. 1957. The fixation of phosphorus by soils. Advances in Agronomy 9, 95–112 [Google Scholar]
  51. Palme K, Gälweiler L. 1999. PIN-pointing the molecular basis of auxin transport. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2, 375–381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Parizot B, Laplaze L, Ricaud L, et al. 2008. Diarch symmetry of the vascular bundle in Arabidopsis root encompasses the pericycle and is reflected in distich lateral root initiation. Plant Physiology 146, 140–148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Péret B, Clément M, Nussaume L, Desnos T. 2011. Root developmental adaptation to phosphate starvation: better safe than sorry. Trends in Plant Science 16, 450–442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pérez Torres CA, López Bucio J, Cruz-Ramírez A, Ibarra-Laclette E, Dharmasiri S, Estelle M, Herrera Estrella L. 2009. Phosphate availability alters lateral root development in Arabidopsis by modulating auxin sensitivity via a mechanism involving the TIR1 auxin receptor. Plant Signaling and Behavior 4, 781–783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ryan P, Delhaize E, Jones D. 2001. Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 52, 527–560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sánchez-Calderón L, López-Bucio J, Chacón-López A, Cruz-Ramírez A, Nieto-Jacobo F, Dubrovsky JG, Herrera-Estrella L. 2005. Phosphate starvation induces a determinate developmental program in the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant and Cell Physiology 46, 174–184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Schnabel EL, Frugoli J. 2004. The PIN and LAX families of auxin transport genes in Medicago truncatula . Molecular Genetics and Genomics 272, 420–432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Singla B, Chugh A, Khurana JP, Khurana P. 2006. An early auxin-responsive Aux/IAA gene from wheat (Triticum aestivum) is induced by epibrassinolide and differentially regulated by light and calcium. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 4059–4070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Smith SE, Jakobsen I, Grønlund M, Smith FA. 2011. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant phosphorus nutrition: interactions between pathways of phosphorus uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots have important implications for understanding and manipulating plant phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiology 156, 1050–1057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Svistoonoff S, Creff A, Reymond M, Sigoillot-Claude C, Ricaud L, Blanchet A, Nussaume L, Desnos T. 2007. Root tip contact with low-phosphate media reprograms plant root architecture. Nature Genetics 39, 792–796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tadano T, Sakai H. 1991. Secretion of acid phosphatase by the roots of several crop species under phosphorus-deficient conditions. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 37, 129–140 [Google Scholar]
  62. Teng W, Deng Y, Chen X-P, et al. 2013. Characterization of root response to phosphorus supply from morphology to gene analysis in field-grown wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 1403–1411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Vanneste S, Friml J. 2009. Auxin: a trigger for change in plant development. Cell 136, 1005–1016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Watanabe C, Fujii N, Yanai K, et al. 2012. Gravistimulation changes the accumulation pattern of the CsPIN1 auxin efflux facilitator in the endodermis of the transition zone in cucumber seedlings. Plant Physiology 158, 239–251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wu Y, He D. 2011. Advances in root hairs in Gramineae and Triticum aestivum . African Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 1047–1050 [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang L, Zhao G, Jia J, Liu X, Kong X. 2012. Molecular characterization of 60 isolated wheat MYB genes and analysis of their expression during abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 63, 203–214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhou C, Han L, Wang Z-Y. 2011. Potential but limited redundant roles of MtPIN4, MtPIN5 and MtPIN10/SLM1 in the development of Medicago truncatula . Plant Signaling and Behavior 6, 1834–1836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhu J, Kaeppler SM, Lynch JP. 2005. Mapping of QTLs for lateral root branching and length in maize (Zea mays L.) under differential phosphorus supply. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111, 688–695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhu J, Lynch JP. 2004. The contribution of lateral rooting to phosphorus acquisition efficiency in maize (Zea mays) seedlings. Functional Plant Biology 31, 949–958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhu J, Zhang C, Lynch JP. 2010. The utility of phenotypic plasticity of root hair length for phosphorus acquisition. Functional Plant Biology 37, 313–322 [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES