Abstract
Normal stem cells from a variety of tissues display unique metabolic properties compared to their more differentiated progeny. However, relatively little is known about heterogeneity of metabolic properties cancer stem cells, also called tumor initiating cells (TICs). In this study we show that, analogous to some normal stem cells, breast TICs have distinct metabolic properties compared to non-tumorigenic cancer cells (NTCs). Transcriptome profiling using RNA-Seq revealed TICs under-express genes involved in mitochondrial biology and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and metabolic analyses revealed TICs preferentially perform glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation compared to NTCs. Mechanistic analyses demonstrated that decreased expression and activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase (Pdh), a key regulator of oxidative phosphorylation, play a critical role in promoting the pro-glycolytic phenotype of TICs. Metabolic reprogramming via forced activation of Pdh preferentially eliminates TICs both in vitro and in vivo. Our findings reveal unique metabolic properties of TICs and demonstrate that metabolic reprogramming represents a promising strategy for targeting these cells.
Keywords: Breast tumor initiating cells or cancer stem cells, Metabolic reprogramming, Warburg effect, DCA, glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation
Introduction
Cells produce energy primarily through two interconnected processes: glycolysis (the catabolism of glucose to pyruvate) and oxidative phosphorylation (the production of energy from glucose via the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle). Over 85 years ago, the German biochemist Otto Warburg discovered that unlike normal tissues, cancer cells in many kinds of tumors preferentially perform glycolysis in the presence of oxygen as opposed to oxidative phosphorylation 1, 2. His observations, known as the “Warburg effect”, have been repeatedly confirmed but remain incompletely understood 3.
At Warburg's time and for many years thereafter, the prevailing model of tumor biology posited that all cancer cells are equivalent in their ability to proliferate indefinitely. However, in recent years it has become clear that many tumors contain a phenotypically unique subset of cancer cells that appears to be the sole population able to divide indefinitely or to form new tumors. These data have led to the formulation of the cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis, which proposes that cancers can be viewed as abnormal organs composed of self-renewing CSCs (a.k.a. tumor initiating cells (TICs) or tumorigenic cancer cells) and their descendent, more differentiated non-tumorigenic cancer cells (NTCs) which have limited proliferative potential 4. Published xenograft studies, together with recent lineage tracing studies, have documented the existence of TICs in breast cancers 4, 5 and many other tumor types 6–19. As is the case with normal stem cells, TICs cannot be isolated as entirely pure populations but can be highly enriched compared to NTC populations using cell sorting strategies. Published TIC frequencies in enriched populations from primary tumors vary from 1 in 100 to 1 in 10,000, although are actually likely higher due to cell damage induced by dissociation and cell sorting and inefficiencies of cell transplantation.
In trying to explain the preferential glycolysis he observed in cancer cells, Warburg noted that normal tissues undergo a switch from glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation during embryogenesis and he therefore equated carcinogenesis with “dedifferentiation” of mature normal cells to more immature malignant cells 20. Based on new insights afforded by the CSC hypothesis, we suggest that instead of “dedifferentiation”, the Warburg effect may arise in part from preferential glycolysis occurring in immature tumor cells (i.e. TICs) that have not differentiated. This concept is in line with well documented clinical observations of elevated glucose uptake by different types of poorly differentiated tumors compared to well differentiated tumors 21, 22, which may reflect an increased proportion of cancer stem/progenitor cells in poorly differentiated tumors.
We and others have previously found that TIC-enriched population in a variety of tumor types contain lower levels for reactive oxygen species (ROS) than NTCs 23–25 and part of the mechanism for this difference is elevated levels of free radical scavengers in TIC-enriched population. However, another potential mechanism for decreased levels of ROS is decreased production of ROS, which has not been previously explored. Since electron transport during oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria is the main source of endogenous ROS 26, we hypothesized that TICs preferentially perform glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation. Intriguingly, long-term hematopoietic stem cells preferentially utilize glycolysis instead of oxidative phosphorylation for energy production 27, 28. Similarly, embryonic stem cells preferentially perform glycolysis and undergo a switch to oxidative phosphorylation as they differentiate 29, 30.
We set out to test the hypothesis that TICs preferentially perform glycolysis compared to NTCs. We found that TIC-enriched population rely more heavily on glycolysis than NTCs and this is reflected in the gene expression programs of the two cell types. Differences in mitochondrial number and expression of the key mitochondrial enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase (Pdh) underlie the unique metabolic properties of TICs and forced upregulation of oxidative phosphorylation by activation of Pdh preferentially targets TICs. Our findings suggest that promotion of oxidative phosphorylation is a promising strategy for targeting TICs.
Materials and Methods
Cell Labeling, Flow Cytometry, Cell sorting, 3-Dimensional Cancer Spheroid Assay, Transplantation and Limited Dilution Assay
MMTV-Wnt-1 murine breast tumors were harvested, dissociated into single cell suspensions, sorted and processed according to previously described methods 5,23. Details were also shown in supplemental materials and methods.
Dichloroacetic acid (DCA) treatment of tumor bearing animals
In vivo treatments were initiated when transplanted tumor reached a size of ~0.5 cm diameter. Sodium dichloroacetate (Thermo Fisher, Cat# 338280100) dissolved in phosphate buffered saline was intraperitoneally injected to tumor-bearing mice once a day until control animals had to be euthanized due to tumor size.
RNA-Seq and gene set enrichment assay (GSEA)
Methods for generating and analyzing the RNA-Seq data are available in the supplemental methods. Sequencing data are accessible through Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE41286).
Pdh activity assay
300,000 cells were sorted for Pdh activity analysis with the MitoProfile Dipstick Assay Kit (MitoSciences, #MSP30) according to manufacturer instruction. Pdh activity was quantified by the intensity of the band using a digital imaging system.
Metabolic assays
BD Oxygen Biosensor plates (BD Bioscience, #353830) were used for measurement of oxygen consumption. Cells were incubated at 37°C with or without DCA for 12 hours and oxygen consumption was determined by measuring the fluorescent intensity at 630nm. From the same wells, 10ul supernatant were collected for lactate concentration assessment. Lactate was measured using a commercial kit from Trinity Biotech (County Wicklow, Ireland) according to manufacturer instruction. Additional details are available in the supplemental methods.
Statistical analyses
Replicate numbers represent biological replicates using distinct tumors from separate mice. Levels of significance were determined by Student's t-tests using α=0.05.
Results
Optimization of TIC isolation
We have previously reported that the expression of Thy1, CD24, and CD49f enables the prospective purification of TICs from MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary tumors5, 23. In order to enable isolation of enough TICs to perform metabolic and biochemical analyses of TICs and NTCs we set out to further optimize isolation of TICs from these tumors. To begin we examined expression of basal (Krt14 and Trp63) and luminal (Krt8 and Krt18) markers in MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary tumors by immunofluorescence (Figure S1A and data not shown) and confirmed that these tumors contain both luminal- and basal-like cells. Given that TICs often display a mesenchymal- or basal-like phenotype, we next searched for surface markers that would allow robust separation of basal and luminal breast cancer cells. We specifically focused on CD49f and Epcam, which had previously been used to identify luminal and basal-like cells in human mammary epithelium 31. Expression of these two markers separated malignant cells into two distinct populations: CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells and CD49flow Epcamhigh cells (Figure 1A).
Figure 1.
CD49fhighEpcamlow cells in MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary tumors are highly enriched for tumor initiating cells. (A) FACS analysis of a representative MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary tumor reveals distinct CD49flowEpcamhigh and CD49fhighEpcamlow populations. (B) Expression of basal and luminal breast markers in purified CD49fhighEpcamlow and CD49flowEpcamhigh cells using qRT-PCR. (C) In vivo limiting dilution analysis of purified CD49fhighEpcamlow and CD49flowEpcamhigh cells. Sorted cells were injected into syngeneic recipients at the cell dosages indicated and animals were observed for tumor formation. (D) Representative sorting gates to further subdivide the CD49fhighEpcamlow population.
In order to confirm the differentiation state of the two populations, we next examined expression of basal and luminal markers by quantitative RT-PCR. CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells expressed genes found in mammary basal stem/progenitor cells, including Trp63, Krt14, Vim and Acta2, while CD49flow Epcamhigh cells overexpressed markers associated with luminal differentiation, including Esr1, Krt18 and Krt19 (Figure 1B). This expression pattern confirmed that CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells displayed a basal-like phenotype, and suggested that this population is enriched for TICs.
We next tested the tumor initiating ability of the two populations by transplanting double-sorted CD49fhigh Epcamlow and CD49flow Epcamhigh cells into syngeneic mice in a limiting dilution fashion. As shown in Figure 1C, 1 in 79 (95% confidence interval, 1/40 to 1/154) CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells could initiate tumors and this population was ~300 fold enriched for tumor initiating activity compared to CD49flow Epcamhigh cells (p<0.0001). This represents a significant enrichment over the 1 tumorigenic cell in greater than 200 cells observed with our previous isolation strategy based on CD24, Thy1, and CD49f 5 which did not separate TICs and NTCs as clearly (Figure S1D and S1E) and is among the highest enrichment for solid tumor TICs in primary tumors that has been reported.
We next tested whether subpopulations within the CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells were even more highly enriched for TICs. For example, further stratifying this population based on Epcam expression did not result in significant enrichment of tumor initiating activity (Figure 1D & Table S1; p=0.20). Similarly, sorting based on expression of CD24 and Thy1, did not yield additional functional enrichment (data not shown). This indicates that TICs are distributed equally throughout the CD49fhigh Epcamlow subpopulation and we therefore performed subsequent experiments using CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells as the TIC-enriched population and CD49flow Epcamhigh cells as NTCs. Flow cytometric analysis of tumors established from purified CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells revealed similar immunophenotypic profiles as the original tumors, including the presence of both CD49fhigh Epcamlow and CD49flow Epcamhigh cells (Figure S1B and S1C). CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells isolated from secondary and tertiary tumors retained tumor initiating potential in repeat transplants (data not shown). Thus, CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells are highly enriched for TICs and can both self-renew and give rise to non-tumorigenic CD49flow Epcamhigh cells. For simplification, we will call this population as TIC for this mouse mammary tumor model in this study.
Transcriptome profiling of TIC by RNA-Seq
To begin exploring potential metabolic differences between TICs and NTCs we purified CD49fhigh Epcamlow and CD49flow Epcamhigh cells by flow cytometry and performed paired-end RNA sequencing. Sequencing libraries were of high quality and produced an average of over 112 million reads per sample of which ~83% could be mapped to the reference genome. While many genes were similarly expressed in the two populations, a significant number was overexpressed by either TICs or NTCs (Figure S2A–B). As expected, CD49f (Itga6) was overexpressed by TIC-enriched CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells while Epcam was overexpressed by CD49flow Epcamhigh cells. Known markers of basal/stem cells including Acta2, Vim, Trp63, and Krt5 where overexpressed in the TIC-enriched population while known luminal markers such as Krt18, Krt19, and Esr1 were overexpressed in the NTC population (Figure 2A and Figure S2C). Thus, our RNA-Seq data faithfully recapitulated known expression differences between the two tumor cell subpopulations.
Figure 2.
Comprehensive transcriptome analysis by RNA-Seq reveals decreased expression of oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial genes in TICs compared to NTCs. (A) Relative expression of selected basal/stem and luminal cell markers in TICs and NTCs as measured by RNA-Seq. (B) Random-set enrichment scoring of gene sets from Molecular Signatures Database. GSZ score, gene set z score. Locations of several key gene sets are indicated. (C) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of metabolism-related gene sets. Analysis includes 11,433 well measured genes. Vertical bars represent genes from each of the indicated gene sets. Ox. Phos. = oxidative phosphorylation. (D) Gene expression heat map of tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) enzymes in TICs and NTCs.
Next we asked if pre-defined gene sets, including gene sets related to metabolic processes, were significantly enriched in either TICs or NTCs. To begin, we employed random set enrichment scoring to identify genes sets from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB-c2) that were enriched in TICs or NTCs 32. As previously described for human TICs33, we identified gene sets related to epithelial mesenchymal transition among the most significantly enriched gene sets in TICs. Strikingly, we identified multiple gene sets related to mitochondria and oxidative phosphorylation as being highly enriched in NTCs, suggesting that NTCs may preferentially perform oxidative phosphorylation compared to TICs (Fig 2B; p<1×10−5). The fact that metabolism-related gene sets were among the most enriched gene sets suggested that metabolic differences might be a fundamental property that distinguishes the two types of cancer cells. In order to further extend this observation, we assessed the expression of additional, curated metabolism-associated gene sets in TICs and NTCs by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)34, 35. This analysis confirmed the significant enrichment of genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation and revealed additional enrichment of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes in NTCs (Figure 2C and Figure S2D). Similarly, analysis of key enzymes involved in the tricarboxylic acid cycle revealed that the majority were overexpressed in NTCs compared to TICs (Figure 2D). Glycolytic genes were not significantly overexpressed by either subpopulation but trended towards being overexpressed by TICs. Lack of statistical enrichment of glycolytic genes is not surprising since pyruvate produced by glycolysis is also a key carbon source for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, and therefore glycolytic genes are expressed in cells undergoing oxidative phosphorylation. NTCs also displayed significant overexpression of genes involved in proliferation, suggesting that a higher fraction of these cells are cycling. Thus, deep sequencing of breast TIC and NTC transcriptomes revealed differences in metabolic programs between the two cell types.
Mitochondrial differences in TICs and NTCs
Elevated expression of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation by NTCs suggested that there were differences in mitochondrial metabolism between TICs and NTCs. To test this possibility, we first assessed the number of mitochondria present in TICs and NTCs by using transmission electron microscopy and found that TICs contained fewer mitochondria than NTCs (Figure 3A and 3B, p=0.03). Comparison of the relative amounts of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to nuclear DNA can also be used to assess relative mitochondrial numbers. Therefore, we determined the ratio of mtDNA to nuclear DNA in the two cell populations using quantitative PCR. The ratio of mtDNA to nuclear DNA was lower in TICs than NTCs, consistent with our ultrastructural analyses (Figure 3C, p=0.02). Finally, we also examined expression of mitochondria-encoded genes in the two cell populations. Transcripts for Cox1, Cox2 and Cytb, were significantly overexpressed in NTCs compared to TICs (Figure 3D).
Figure 3.
TICs contain fewer mitochondria than NTCs. (A) Ultrastructural analysis of sorted TICs and NTCs using transmission electron microscopy. Representative images are shown at magnification of 2,500x in upper panels and 5,000x in lower panels. Arrows in lower panel indicate examples of mitochondria. (B) Quantification of mitochondrial numbers per section in TIC and NTCs. Results were normalized to the average number of mitochondria in TICs (n=8; p=0.03). (C) Real time quantitative PCR analysis of the ratio of mitochondrial Cox1 DNA to nuclear beta-actin DNA. Results were normalized to TICs (n=4; p=0.02). (D) Real time quantitative PCR analysis of RNA expression of the mitochondria-encoded genes Cox1, Cox2, and Cytb. Results were normalized to TICs (n=4; p=0.0002, 0.01 and 0.05 respectively). (E) Analysis of mitochondrial activity using the fluorescent dye JC-1.
Our ultrastructural analyses also suggested preferential presence of activated mitochondria in NTCs, including clustering of mitochondria, thickened cristae and “wagon wheel” morphology 36, while little evidence of activation was seen in TICs. To confirm this we examined mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) in the two cell populations. Cells that are pro-glycolytic and contain less active mitochondria display higher ΔΨm than cells performing more oxidative phosphorylation37. Consistent with our ultrastructural observations, TICs displayed significantly hyperpolarized ΔΨm compared to NTCs as measured by increased PE/FITC ratio of the ΔΨm-sensitive probe JC-1 (Figure 3E, p<0.002). Thus, TICs contain fewer and less active mitochondria than NTCs, suggesting that they display a pro-glycolytic phenotype.
TICs display pro-glycolytic metabolism
To directly evaluate glucose metabolism, we compared the balance of glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation in the two subpopulations by measuring lactate production and oxygen consumption. TIC-enriched cells displayed a significantly higher ratio of lactate production to oxygen consumption than NTC-enriched cells (p=0.006; Figure 4A). To further extend this finding, we compared the glucose transport rates in TICs and NTCs, since pro-glycolytic cells display higher rates of glucose import than cells relying mostly on oxidative phosphorylation for energy production. Consistent with their pro-glycolytic metabolic profile, TICs displayed significantly higher glucose uptake than NTCs (Figure 4B, p=0.01). Thus, TICs in MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary tumors are pro-glycolytic compared to the remaining cancer cells.
Figure 4.
TICs display a pro-glycolytic phenotype. (A) Lactate production and oxygen consumption in TICs and NTCs (n=3; p=0.006). (B) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in TICs and NTCs after staining for 40 min with 10mM 2-NBDG (n=3; p<0.01).C) Representative cell cycle profiles of TICs and NTCs. The percentage of cells in G0–1, S, and G2-M are indicated. (D) Percentage of TICs and NTCs in G0/G1, S and G2-M fractions. On average, 3.7% of TICs versus 24.2% of NTCs were found in S-G2-M (n=2; p=0.005). Data expressed as mean ± SEM. (E) Double staining of Ki67 (red) and K8/18 (green) in a representative MMTV-Wnt1 mammary tumor. Lower panel displays higher magnification of the region in the white box in the upper panel. (F) Distribution of Ki67 staining among subsets of breast cancer cells. Data expressed as mean ± SEM.
Since the pioneering work of Otto Warburg, it has been recognized that highly proliferative cells often preferentially perform glycolysis compared to oxidative phosphorylation. However, TICs are generally thought to represent a relatively quiescent subpopulation of tumor cells and our GSEA analyses seemed to confirm this. To directly address this question we performed cell cycle analysis on purified CD49fhigh Epcamlow and CD49flow Epcamhigh cells. Strikingly, the TIC-enriched population contained a significantly smaller fraction of cells in S-G2-M compared with the NTC-enriched population (3.7% versus 24.2%, respectively; p=0.005; Figure 4C & D). This result was confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis of Ki67 and Krt8/18 expression in MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors, which demonstrated that the majority of Ki67 positive cells expressed luminal cytokeratins (Figure 4E & F, p=0.002). Thus, TICs are relatively quiescent compared to NTCs and their pro-glycolytic phenotype is an intrinsic feature of these cells and not simply a reflection of more rapid proliferation.
Decreased Pdh Expression and Activity in TICs
We next sought potential regulators of the metabolic differences between TICs and NTCs and focused on the pyruvate dehydrogenase (Pdh) complex, which was overexpressed by NTCs in our RNA-Seq data (Figure 2D). Pdh converts pyruvate, the final product of glycolysis, to acetyl-CoA and thus serves as the key link between the cytosolic glycolytic pathway and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Genes composing the Pdh complex (Pdha1, Pdhb, and Pdhx) were approximately two fold overexpressed in NTCs compared to TICs (Figure 5A), suggesting that higher Pdh activity may contribute to the enhanced oxidative phosphorylation observed in NTCs. Analysis of Pdh complex protein levels in sorted TICs and NTCs revealed that protein expression was approximately two fold decreased in TICs (Figure 5B). Consistent with the observed expression differences, Pdh enzymatic activity was also approximately two fold higher in NTCs, implying decreased import of pyruvate into mitochondria in TICs compared to NTCs (Figure 5C and 5D). Endogenously, the Pdh complex is negatively regulated by the pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (Pdk) family, whose members phosphorylate the Pdh complex at multiple serine residues, thus resulting in enzyme inhibition. We observed roughly equivalent Pdh phosphorylation at Ser 232 in both TICs and NTCs (Figure 5B), suggesting that the observed difference in Pdh activity is mostly due to differences in protein abundance.
Figure 5.
Decreased expression and activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase in TICs and NTCs. (A) Real time quantitative PCR analysis of pyruvate dehydrogenase subunit RNA expression in TICs and NTCs (n=3; p<0.01). (B) Representative western blot analysis of Pdh protein expression and phosphorylation in TICs and NTCs (n=3). (C) Pdh enzyme activity in TICs and NTCs using dipstick assay (see methods). (D) Densitometric quantification of bands from Pdh activity assay (n=3; p<0.01).
Targeting TICs by Metabolic Reprogramming
Given the observed preference for glycolysis and decreased expression and activity of Pdh in TICs we hypothesized that activation of Pdh activity might specifically target TICs. Pdh activity can be increased by inhibiting Pdk family members using dichloroacetic acid (DCA), a small molecule inhibitor that acts as a pyruvate mimetic38–40. DCA has previously been shown to promote oxidative phosphorylation in bulk cancer cells that display the Warburg effect37, 41, 42 and we hypothesized that DCA may similarly reprogram the metabolism of TICs. Employing a 3-dimensional cancer spheroid culture system we found that treatment of TICs with DCA resulted in a dose dependent decrease of TIC clonogenicity (Figure 6A and 6B). By comparison, NTCs, which are unable to form tumors in vivo but can give rise to colonies in vitro, were significantly less sensitive to DCA. In order to confirm that DCA treatment resulted in the desired metabolic effects, we measured levels of lactate production and oxygen consumption before and after exposure to the drug. DCA resulted in a significant shift towards oxygen consumption, an effect that was significantly more dramatic in TICs than NTCs given their initially higher levels of lactate production (Figure 6C).
Figure 6.
Glycolysis inhibitors selectively target TICs in vitro and in vivo. (A) Representative images of spheroid formation in presence and absences of 12.5 mM Dichloroacetic acid (DCA). B) Dose-dependent inhibition of TIC and NTC spheroid formation by DCA (n=3, * = p<0.01). (C) Ratio of lactate production to oxygen consumption in TICs and NTC in the presence and absence of DCA (n=3; p<0.01). (D) Significant inhibition of TIC, but not NTC, spheroid formation by 2-deoxy-D-glucose and sodium oxamate (n=5). Representative images of spheroid formation are shown in supplementary Figure S3A. (E) Growth curves of MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary tumors treated with DCA. Tumors were treated with vehicle or 75 mg/kg DCA once they reached a size of 5 mm. (F) Percent change of TIC-enriched (CD49fhigh Epcamlow Lin-) and NTC (CD49flow Epcamhigh Lin-) subpopulations in DCA treated tumors compared to vehicle treated tumors as assessed by flow cytometry (n=3; p<0.02).
To confirm these observations, we used two additional drugs that target glycolysis and tested if they preferentially target TICs over NTCs. Specifically, we tested the sensitivity of the two cell types to sodium oxamate, which inhibits lactate dehydrogenase and thus makes more pyruvate available for oxidative phosphorylation, and 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG), a glucose analog and well-described glycolytic inhibitor. We found that similar to our results with DCA, TICs were significantly more sensitive to sodium oxamate and 2-DG than NTCs (Figure 6D and S3A). Thus, TICs are significantly more dependent on glycolysis than NTCs and inhibition of this metabolic pathway selectively targets TICs.
We next wished to extend our findings to an additional murine mammary tumor model. Therefore, we explored whether TICs from MMTV-PyMT mouse mammary tumors also displayed a pro-glycolytic phenotype. Based on the recently described characterization of TIC markers in this model 43, we purified CD49fhighCD24+ TIC-enriched cells and CD24−CD49− NTCs from PyMT tumors. As was the case in MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors, we observed consistently higher expression of mitochondrial and oxidative phosphorylation genes by NTCs (Figure S4A, S4B and S4C) and higher lactate production by TICs (Figure S4D). Additionally, tumor spheres initiated by CD49fhighCD24+ TIC-enriched cells were sensitive to DCA treatment in a dose-dependent manner (Figure S4E and S4F). Thus, TICs from distinct murine mammary tumors display a pro-glycolytic phenotype and are sensitive to metabolic reprograming by DCA.
Given the inhibitory effects of DCA on TICs in vitro we next asked whether promotion of oxidative phosphorylation could also preferentially target TICs in vivo. When mice bearing MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors were treated with DCA, we observed significant tumor growth inhibition (Figure 6E). In order to assess relative effects on TICs and NTCs, tumors were dissociated, processed and analyzed by flow cytometry. Compared to control tumors, the abundance of the CD49fhigh Epcamlow TIC-enriched population was relatively decreased compared with CD49flow Epcamhigh NTCs in treated tumors (Figure 6F). Of note, we could observe a similar shift from TICs to NTCs in vitro. While DCA completely inhibited tumor sphere formation when added to TIC cultures at the time of plating (Figure 6A), if TIC cultures were treated with DCA starting three days after plating some spheres survived (Figure S3B and S3C). Real-time PCR analysis of cells from these spheres revealed an increase of the NTC marker Esr1 and decrease of the TIC marker p63 (Figure S3D), suggesting that these colonies contained a higher fraction of NTCs after DCA treatment. These findings suggested that promotion of oxidative phosphorylation via DCA preferentially targets and depletes TICs both in vivo and in vitro.
Although CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells are highly enriched for TICs, they also contain cells without tumorigenic activity. Thus, it is potentially possible that the metabolic differences we observed are mostly due to non-TICs within the CD49fhigh Epcamlow subpopulation. In order to confirm that DCA treatment actually targets TICs, we therefore performed in vivo limiting dilution analyses to measure the fraction of TICs in tumors treated with DCA compared to controls. If DCA targets TICs then the fraction of tumor forming cells should be lower in treated tumors. As shown in Table S3, DCA treated tumors contained approximately four fold fewer tumor initiating cells than control tumors. This result confirmed that metabolic reprogramming via DCA directly targeted TICs in vivo.
Metabolic properties and reprograming of human breast TICs
In order to extend our findings from mouse models to human breast cancer we explored whether TICs from primary human breast cancer surgical specimens displayed a similar pro-glycolytic phenotype. We therefore analyzed previously published gene expression data from human TICs (CD44+CD24−/lowLin−) and NTCs purified from primary patient specimens44, 45. We performed GSEA on microarray data from sorted TICs and NTCs from 11 human breast tumors using the same gene sets employed in the earlier analyses of murine TICs and NTCs. Congruently, we observed significant enrichment of genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation, mitochondria, and proliferation in human NTCs (Figure 7A and S3A–D). As in the mouse model, glycolysis genes were not statistically significantly enriched in either cell type, consistent with the glycolytic enzymes being necessary for pyruvate production in both metabolic pathways. Thus, human TICs and NTCs display similar metabolism gene expression profiles as their murine counterparts.
Figure 7.
Human breast TICs display pro-glycolytic phenotypes and are sensitive to DCA. (A) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of metabolism-related gene sets in microarray data from 11 pairs of TICs and NTCs from primary human breast cancers. Vertical bars represent genes from each of the indicated gene sets. Ox. Phos. = oxidative phosphorylation. (B) Mitochondrial content in human TICs (CD49fhigh Epcamhigh) and NTCs (CD49flow Epcamlow) assessed by MitoTracker (n=3; p<0.001). MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. (C) Real time quantitative PCR analysis of the ratio of mitochondrial Cytb DNA to nuclear beta-actin DNA. Results were normalized to TICs (n=3; p<0.001). (D) Representative images of spheroid formation by human TICs in presence and absences of 25 mM DCA. (E) Dose-dependent inhibition of TIC spheroid formation by DCA (n=3). (F) Inhibition of in vitro self-renewal in secondary passage for TICs treated with 12.5 mM DCA in the primary passage (n=3; p<0.001).
Next we examined mitochondrial numbers in human breast TICs and NTCs. To do so we employed two independent patient-derived triple negative breast cancer xenografts in which we previously showed CD49fhigh Epcamhigh cells to be highly enriched for TICs 46 (Figure S6D). Of note, these markers differ from those used in MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors but were confirmed by in vivo limiting dilution analyses in both cases and are consistent with previously observed differences in marker expression between human and mouse normal and cancer stem cells 15, 47, 48. Assessment of mitochondrial content using MitoTracker (Figure 7B and S6) or the ratio of mtDNA to nuclear DNA (Figure 7C and S6) revealed significantly lower numbers of mitochondria in the TIC-enriched population. Thus, mitochondrial difference between TICs and NTCs are conserved between murine mammary tumors and human breast cancers.
Finally, we wished to test whether metabolic reprogramming by DCA also targets human breast TICs. CD49fhigh Epcamhigh human TIC-enriched cells are clonogenic in a 3-dimensional cancer spheroid culture system while CD49flow Epcamlow cells cannot give rise to colonies. Treatment of CD49fhigh Epcamhigh TIC-enriched cells with DCA resulted in a dose dependent decrease of TIC clonogenicity in the first passage very similar to what we observed with TICs from MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors (Figures 7D and E and S6). In secondary passage in the absence of DCA, cells treated with DCA in the first passage display dramatically lower sphere formation, indicating decreased in vitro self-renewal (Figure 7F). Taken together, these results indicate that promotion of oxidative phosphorylation also targets human breast TICs and represents a potential therapeutic strategy for targeting TICs in human patients.
Discussion
In recent years there has been a renewed interest in the unique metabolic properties of cancer cells. Changes in metabolism are one of the hallmarks of cancer 49 and cells in many types of cancers preferentially undergo glycolysis. The vast majority of studies in this area have focused on bulk populations of cancer cell lines. However, a continuously increasing body of evidence documents the existence of cellular hierarchies within many tumor types. Based on previous demonstration that breast TICs contain lower levels of ROS at baseline and since most endogenously produced ROS stem from oxidative phosphorylation, we hypothesized that TICs have unique metabolic properties compared to NTCs. Using a combination of genomic and metabolic approaches we found that TICs are pro-glycolytic and contain fewer, less active mitochondria. Activity of Pdh, a key enzyme for initiation of oxidative phosphorylation, is significantly reduced in TICs and forced elevation of Pdh activity eliminates TICs in vitro and in vivo in both murine mammary tumors and human breast cancers.
Previous studies have shown that metabolic properties of several types of normal stem cells differ from those of their more differentiated progeny 27, 29, 30, and enhanced rates of glycolysis have been described in embryonic stem cells 29, 50, suggesting that preferential reliance on glycolytic metabolism may be a broadly conserved stem cell property. However, only very limited published data exist regarding metabolic properties of TICs42, 51–56, and none in breast cancer. Three recently published studies examined metabolic properties of glioma stem cell-enriched cells (GSC-ECs) and non-tumorigenic cells inglioma cell lines51 or primary human samples53, 56. The study focusing on established cell lines found GSC-ECs were less glycolytic than non-tumorigenic cells51, while the other two studies, using primary glioma samples, observed a pro-glycolytic phenotype in GSC-ECs53, 56. Our observation of a pro-glycolytic phenotype in TICs from primary breast tumors are in line with the later two studies. The discordant results may reflect differences in metabolic properties between TIC-like cells from cell lines that have been passaged in vitro and TICs isolated from primary tumors. Alternatively, there were methodological differences among the studies, such as differences in isolation of cells (flow cytometry versus enrichment by differential culture conditions), which could have contributed to the results. It will be interesting to examine if the decrease in mitochondrial number and activity that we observed in breast TICs are also prevalent in other tumor types, including gliomas.
One of our most striking findings was the observation that breast TICs are pro-glycolytic even though they are relatively quiescent. Elevated rates of aerobic glycolysis are usually thought to accompany enhanced proliferation and this phenotype has frequently been documented in rapidly dividing cancer cells and is termed the “Warburg effect.” Our data indicate that TICs are specifically programmed to undergo enhanced rates of glycolysis, irrespective of their cell cycle state. In agreement with our findings, HSCs have recently been shown to preferentially perform glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation compared to their more differentiated progeny, even though they are more quiescent 28. Additionally, a recent study comparing metabolic properties of quiescent and proliferating fibroblasts found that quiescent fibroblasts were highly metabolically active, including demonstrating high rates of glycolysis. Furthermore, similar to TICs, total free radical levels were lower in quiescent fibroblasts, potentially due to increased availability of GSH 57.
Our findings raise the question of why TICs display a pro-glycolytic phenotype. For rapidly dividing cells, a pro-glycolytic phenotype may be advantageous due to diversion of glycolytic intermediates upstream of pyruvate into other biosynthetic pathways, thus meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation 58. However, compared to NTCs, TICs are pro-glycolytic in the absence of rapid proliferation suggesting that other explanations are required. We suggest that preference for glycolysis by TICs relates to effects on levels of ROS. Maintenance of low ROS levels is critical for normal stem cells and TICs since elevation of ROS limits self-renewal 23, 59, 60. Since glycolysis results in decreased production of endogenous ROS compared to oxidative phosphorylation 61, pro-glycolytic metabolism is likely advantageous for this reason. Additionally, glycolytic metabolism and reduced oxygen consumption may confer a survival advantage to TICs during transient hypoxia or anoxia in the tumor microenvironment. Consistent with this idea, tumor hypoxia, induced by anti-angiogenic agents, was shown to increase growth of breast TICs62.
The fact that breast TICs preferentially perform glycolysis and display decreased Pdh expression and activity led us to hypothesize that exogenous activation of Pdh leading to increased rates of oxidative phosphorylation would induce TIC cell killing. Treatment of TICs with DCA “normalized” the ratio of lactate production to oxygen consumption relative to NTCs and led to significant cell death. NTCs were relatively resistant to DCA, consistent with the observation that these cells undergo higher rates of oxidative phosphorylation at baseline. To our knowledge only two previous study has examined effects of DCA on TICs or TIC-like cells. These two studies examined effects of DCA treatment on TIC-like (CD133+ or sphere forming) cells in glioblastoma42, 53 and found that DCA treatment inhibited proliferation of these cells in vitro and in vivo. These results are consistent with our findings.
Although we found that DCA can target TICs, single agent treatment with this drug will likely not be sufficient to eliminate TICs in the clinic. While we observed significant single agent activity on TICs in vivo, the results were not as dramatic as in vitro. This is likely due in large part to the well described, relatively high concentrations of DCA required to achieve the desired metabolic reprogramming effects and the difficulty of achieving these in vivo. Human studies have documented achievable plasma doses up to 1.3 mM 63, which is below the IC50 of DCA for several of the Pdk isoforms 64. Thus, combination of DCA with other therapeutic agents is attractive. Indeed, several studies, together with our own (data not shown) have found at least additive effects of DCA with chemotherapy or radiotherapy 65, 66. It will be important to explore the efficacy of more potent metabolic reprogramming agents and combination regimens of DCA with other therapeutics. Our data argue that such studies should specifically evaluate effects on TICs, given that these cells often represent a minority population and NTCs appear to be relatively resistant to metabolic reprogramming.
Although our TIC subpopulations were highly enriched for TICs, they were not entirely pure and this represents a limitation of our study and most other studies of TICs. However, the fraction of tumor initiating cells in the CD49fhigh Epcamlow was 1 in 79, which is one of the highest enrichment ratios that have been reported for TICs from primary tumors. Additionally, it is likely that the actual fraction of TICs within CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells is significantly higher since tumor dissociation and sorting lead to cell damage and the in vivo transplantation assay is not completely efficient. In support of this concept, the tumor sphere initiating frequency of CD49fhigh Epcamlow was less than 1 in 20 (data not shown). Most importantly, we found that treating tumors with DCA in vivo led to a significant reduction in TIC frequency as measured by limiting dilution analysis in secondary transplants. Since limiting dilution analyses represent the gold standard assay for measuring TICs, this functionally confirms that shifting metabolism of TICs towards oxidative phosphorylation targets these cells and is in line with our metabolic analysis of the CD49fhigh Epcamlow population.
Our findings have significant implications for studies examining cancer metabolism and the Warburg effect. The vast majority of studies in this area have focused on bulk populations of cancer cells, thus obscuring potential heterogeneity of cancer cell metabolism. Given our findings, it is possible that strategies combining multiple agents that target different aspects of metabolism will be required in order to show dramatic effects in the clinic. In tumors where TICs make up a minority subpopulation, early phase clinical trials of metabolically-targeted agents that preferentially target TICs such as DCA may not reveal significant tumor shrinkage and could thus be inadvertently abandoned. Translational endpoints specifically measuring effects of such agents on TICs will be critical for clinical translation.
In summary, we have demonstrated that breast cancer TICs are pro-glycolytic compared to NTCs. This unique metabolic property of TICs is due to differences in mitochondrial biology and is mechanistically mediated by decreased Pdh activity. Metabolic reprogramming of TICs to increase rates of oxidative phosphorylation preferentially targets these cells and is an attractive therapeutic strategy for developing novel TIC-targeted agents.
Supplementary Material
Figure S1. Expression of basal and luminal markers in MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors and normal mammary epithelium. (A) Representative immunofluorescence staining of paraffin embedded MMTV-Wnt-1 breast tumors with antibodies against Krt14 (red) and Krt18 (green). (B) Flow cytometry analysis of first generation tumor from which CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells were isolated by flow cytometry sorter. Cells in the circle were injected in mice and resulted in second generation tumors in C. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of a representative second generation tumor initiated by purified CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells. Only viable, single, lineage negative cells are shown. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of CD49f, Epcam, and CD24 in MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors. The CD49fhigh Epcamlow are also CD49fhighCD24high but Epcam expression more clearly separates TICs and NTCs than CD24 expression does. (E) Expression of TIC and NTC markers in purified CD49fhighCD24high and CD49flowCD24low cells using qRT-PCR.
Figure S2 RNA-Seq analysis of TICs and NTCs. (A) Scatter plot showing FPKM values for TICs and NTCs. The blue and green dots represent genes greater than or equal to two fold overexpressed in TICs and NTCs, respectively. (B) Venn diagram of genes expressed in TICs, NTCs, or both. (C) Representative coverage plots for Krt5 and Krt19 in TICs and NTCs. (D) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of metabolism-related gene sets in TICs and NTCs from MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors. Enrichment plots for the gene sets included in Figure 3B are shown. Genes overexpressed by TICs have low ranks (i.e. on left of plots) while genes overexpressed by NTCs have high ranks (i.e. on right of plots).
Figure S3 Preferential targeting of TICs using metabolic inhibitors. (A) CD49fhigh Epcamlow TIC-enriched cells from MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary tumors are more sensitive to glycolysis inhibitors than NTCs. Representative images of spheroid formation in the presence or absences of 1mM 2-DG and 50mM sodium oxamate. (B) Representative images of spheroid formation when DCA is added at time 0 or 3 days after plating. (C) Spheroid counts from experiments in B (n=5). (D) Expression of NTC (Esr1) and TIC (p63) markers in cells isolated from experiments in B. Results were normalized to the untreated control (n=3; p=0.02 and 0.001, respectively).
Figure S4 TICs from MMTV-PyMT mouse mammary tumors display a pro-glycolytic phenotype. (A) Real time quantitative PCR analysis of the ratio of mitochondrial Cox1 and Cox2 loci to the nuclear beta-actin locus. Results were normalized to CD49fhighCD24+ TIC-enriched cells (n=3; p=0.001). (B) Real time quantitative PCR analysis comparing expression of the mitochondria-encoded genes Cox1 and Cox2 to nuclear beta-actin. Results were normalized to TICs (n=3; p=0.03 and 0.02 respectively). (C) Real time quantitative PCR analysis of pyruvate dehydrogenase subunit RNA expression in TICs and NTCs (n=3; p<0.01). (D) Lactate production in TICs and NTCs. Results were normalized to TICs (n=3; p<0.01). (E) Representative images of spheroid formation in presence and absences of 25 mM DCA. (F) Dose-dependent inhibition of TIC spheroid formation by DCA (n=5).
Figure S5 Transciptome analysis for human breast cancer TICs and NTCs. (A) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of metabolism-related gene sets in TICs and NTCs from primary human breast cancers. Enrichment plots for the gene sets included in Figure 7A are shown. Genes overexpressed by TICs have low ranks (i.e. on left of plots) while genes overexpressed by NTCs have high ranks (i.e. on right of plots).
Figure S6 TICs from an independent patient-derived triple negative breast cancer xenograft display pro-glycolytic phenotypes and are sensitive to DCA. (A) Mitochondrial content in human TICs (CD49fhigh Epcamhigh) and NTCs (CD49flow Epcamlow) assessed by MitoTracker (n=3; p=0.003). MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. (B) Real time quantitative PCR analysis of the ratio of Krt5 and mitochondrial Cytb RNA to nuclear beta-actin RNA. Results were normalized to TICs (n=3; p<0.002). (C) Dose-dependent inhibition of TIC spheroid formation by DCA (n=5). (D) Flow cytometry analysis of human breast cancer xenograft from which CD49fhighEpcamhigh cells were isolated. Cells in the red circle (TIC, CD49fhighEpcamhigh) and the green circle (NTC, CD49flowEpcamlow) were isolated and examined for their colony forming abilities in vitro. (E) Representative images of spheroid formation by human TICs in presence and absences of 25 mM DCA.
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Clarke, N. Denko, B. Mitchell, and S. Plevritis for helpful discussions and I. Papandreou and K. Qu for technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the Sydney Kimmel Foundation (M.D.), National Institutes of Health (M.D. - P30CA147933), the CRK Faculty Scholar Fund (M.D.), Nadia's Gift (M.D.) and the Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Foundation (M.D.). M.D. is supported by a Doris Duke Clinical Scientist Development Award and the NIH New Innovator Award Program (1-DP2-CA186569).
Footnotes
Author Contributions: Weiguo Feng and Maximilian Diehn: Conception and design, collection and assembly of data, manuscript writing;
Andrew Gentles and Ramesh V. Nair: data analysis and interpretation
Min Huang, Yuan Lin, Cleo Y. Lee, Shang Cai, Ferenc Scheeren, Angera Kuo: collection data, provision of study material
Disclosure of Potential Conflict The authors indicate no potential conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Warburg O, Posener K, Negelein E. Über den stoffwechsel der tumoren. Biochemische. Zeitschrift. 1924:25. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Warburg O. Note on the metabolism of tumours. Biochemische Zeitschrift. 1930;228:257–258. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hsu PP, Sabatini DM. Cancer cell metabolism: Warburg and beyond. Cell. 2008;134:703–707. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, et al. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:3983–3988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0530291100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cho RW, Wang X, Diehn M, et al. Isolation and molecular characterization of cancer stem cells in MMTV-Wnt-1 murine breast tumors. Stem Cells. 2008;26:364–371. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ailles L, Prince M. Cancer stem cells in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;568:175–193. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-280-9_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chu P, Clanton DJ, Snipas TS, et al. Characterization of a subpopulation of colon cancer cells with stem cell-like properties. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:1312–1321. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cocciadiferro L, Miceli V, Kang KS, et al. Profiling cancer stem cells in androgen-responsive and refractory human prostate tumor cell lines. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1155:257–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03696.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cui F, Wang J, Chen D, et al. CD133 is a temporary marker of cancer stem cells in small cell lung cancer, but not in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Rep. 2011;25:701–708. doi: 10.3892/or.2010.1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eramo A, Lotti F, Sette G, et al. Identification and expansion of the tumorigenic lung cancer stem cell population. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:504–514. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Palapattu GS, Wu C, Silvers CR, et al. Selective expression of CD44, a putative prostate cancer stem cell marker, in neuroendocrine tumor cells of human prostate cancer. Prostate. 2009;69:787–798. doi: 10.1002/pros.20928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, et al. Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature. 2004;432:396–401. doi: 10.1038/nature03128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Todaro M, Alea MP, Di Stefano AB, et al. Colon cancer stem cells dictate tumor growth and resist cell death by production of interleukin-4. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:389–402. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang M, Behbod F, Atkinson RL, et al. Identification of tumor-initiating cells in a p53-null mouse model of breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4674–4682. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bonnet D, Dick JE. Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med. 1997;3:730–737. doi: 10.1038/nm0797-730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen J, Li Y, Yu TS, et al. A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth after chemotherapy. Nature. 2012;488:522–526. doi: 10.1038/nature11287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Driessens G, Beck B, Caauwe A, et al. Defining the mode of tumour growth by clonal analysis. Nature. 2012;488:527–530. doi: 10.1038/nature11344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schepers AG, Snippert HJ, Stange DE, et al. Lineage tracing reveals Lgr5+ stem cell activity in mouse intestinal adenomas. Science. 2012;337:730–735. doi: 10.1126/science.1224676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen ZG. The cancer stem cell concept in progression of head and neck cancer. J Oncol. 2009;2009:894064. doi: 10.1155/2009/894064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 1956;123:309–314. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3191.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Krzeslak A, Wojcik-Krowiranda K, Forma E, et al. Expression of GLUT1 and GLUT3 Glucose Transporters in Endometrial and Breast Cancers. Pathol Oncol Res. 2012;18:721–728. doi: 10.1007/s12253-012-9500-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Paudyal B, Oriuchi N, Paudyal P, et al. Expression of glucose transporters and hexokinase II in cholangiocellular carcinoma compared using [18F]-2-fluro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:260–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00683.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Diehn M, Cho RW, Lobo NA, et al. Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells. Nature. 2009;458:780–783. doi: 10.1038/nature07733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Haraguchi N, Ishii H, Mimori K, et al. CD13 is a therapeutic target in human liver cancer stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:3326–3339. doi: 10.1172/JCI42550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Phillips TM, McBride WH, Pajonk F. The response of CD24(-/low)/CD44+ breast cancer-initiating cells to radiation. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1777–1785. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Izyumov DS, Domnina LV, Nepryakhina OK, et al. Mitochondria as source of reactive oxygen species under oxidative stress. Study with novel mitochondria-targeted antioxidants--the “Skulachev-ion” derivatives. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2010;75:123–129. doi: 10.1134/s000629791002001x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Simsek T, Kocabas F, Zheng J, et al. The distinct metabolic profile of hematopoietic stem cells reflects their location in a hypoxic niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:380–390. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Takubo K, Nagamatsu G, Kobayashi CI, et al. Regulation of glycolysis by pdk functions as a metabolic checkpoint for cell cycle quiescence in hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Varum S, Rodrigues AS, Moura MB, et al. Energy metabolism in human pluripotent stem cells and their differentiated counterparts. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kondoh H, Lleonart ME, Nakashima Y, et al. A high glycolytic flux supports the proliferative potential of murine embryonic stem cells. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007;9:293–299. doi: 10.1089/ars.2006.1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lim E, Vaillant F, Wu D, et al. Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nat Med. 2009;15:907–913. doi: 10.1038/nm.2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Newton MA, Quintana FA, Den Boon JA, et al. Random-Set Methods Identify Distinct Aspects of the Enrichment Signal in Gene-Set Analysis. Annals of Applied Statistics. 2007;1:85–106. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, et al. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 2008;133:704–715. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003;34:267–273. doi: 10.1038/ng1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15545–15550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim M, Cooper DD, Hayes SF, et al. Rhodamine-123 staining in hematopoietic stem cells of young mice indicates mitochondrial activation rather than dye efflux. Blood. 1998;91:4106–4117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bonnet S, Archer SL, Allalunis-Turner J, et al. A mitochondria-K+ channel axis is suppressed in cancer and its normalization promotes apoptosis and inhibits cancer growth. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:37–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stacpoole PW. The pharmacology of dichloroacetate. Metabolism. 1989;38:1124–1144. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(89)90051-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stacpoole PW, Lorenz AC, Thomas RG, et al. Dichloroacetate in the treatment of lactic acidosis. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:58–63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-1-58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stacpoole PW, Kerr DS, Barnes C, et al. Controlled clinical trial of dichloroacetate for treatment of congenital lactic acidosis in children. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1519–1531. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Michelakis ED, Webster L, Mackey JR. Dichloroacetate (DCA) as a potential metabolic-targeting therapy for cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:989–994. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Michelakis ED, Sutendra G, Dromparis P, et al. Metabolic modulation of glioblastoma with dichloroacetate. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:31ra34. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ma J, Lanza DG, Guest I, et al. Characterization of mammary cancer stem cells in the MMTV-PyMT mouse model. Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine. 2012;33:1983–1996. doi: 10.1007/s13277-012-0458-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Creighton CJ, Li X, Landis M, et al. Residual breast cancers after conventional therapy display mesenchymal as well as tumor-initiating features. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13820–13825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905718106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liu R, Wang X, Chen GY, et al. The prognostic role of a gene signature from tumorigenic breast-cancer cells. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:217–226. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lee CY, Lin Y, Bratman S, et al. Neuregulin autocrine signaling promotes self-renewal of breast tumor-initiating cells by triggering HER2/HER3 activation. Cancer Res. 2013 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Randall TD, Lund FE, Howard MC, et al. Expression of murine CD38 defines a population of long-term reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 1996;87:4057–4067. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fillmore C, Kuperwasser C. Human breast cancer stem cell markers CD44 and CD24: enriching for cells with functional properties in mice or in man? Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:303. doi: 10.1186/bcr1673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cho YM, Kwon S, Pak YK, et al. Dynamic changes in mitochondrial biogenesis and antioxidant enzymes during the spontaneous differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;348:1472–1478. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vlashi E, Lagadec C, Vergnes L, et al. Metabolic state of glioma stem cells and nontumorigenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:16062–16067. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106704108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang WC, Shyh-Chang N, Yang H, et al. Glycine decarboxylase activity drives non-small cell lung cancer tumor-initiating cells and tumorigenesis. Cell. 2012;148:259–272. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Morfouace M, Lalier L, Bahut M, et al. Comparison of spheroids formed by rat glioma stem cells and neural stem cells reveals differences in glucose metabolism and promising therapeutic applications. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:33664–33674. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.320028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Menendez JA, Joven J, Cufi S, et al. The Warburg effect version 2.0: metabolic reprogramming of cancer stem cells. Cell Cycle. 2013;12:1166–1179. doi: 10.4161/cc.24479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pecqueur C, Oliver L, Oizel K, et al. Targeting metabolism to induce cell death in cancer cells and cancer stem cells. International journal of cell biology. 2013;2013:805975. doi: 10.1155/2013/805975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mao P, Joshi K, Li J, et al. Mesenchymal glioma stem cells are maintained by activated glycolytic metabolism involving aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:8644–8649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221478110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lemons JM, Feng XJ, Bennett BD, et al. Quiescent fibroblasts exhibit high metabolic activity. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nitta E, Yamashita M, Hosokawa K, et al. Telomerase reverse transcriptase protects ATM-deficient hematopoietic stem cells from ROS-induced apoptosis through a telomere-independent mechanism. Blood. 2011;117:4169–4180. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-297390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tothova Z, Kollipara R, Huntly BJ, et al. FoxOs are critical mediators of hematopoietic stem cell resistance to physiologic oxidative stress. Cell. 2007;128:325–339. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kondoh H, Lleonart ME, Bernard D, et al. Protection from oxidative stress by enhanced glycolysis; a possible mechanism of cellular immortalization. Histology and histopathology. 2007;22:85–90. doi: 10.14670/HH-22.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Conley SJ, Gheordunescu E, Kakarala P, et al. Antiangiogenic agents increase breast cancer stem cells via the generation of tumor hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:2784–2789. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018866109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Curry SH, Lorenz A, Chu PI, et al. Disposition and pharmacodynamics of dichloroacetate (DCA) and oxalate following oral DCA doses. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1991;12:375–390. doi: 10.1002/bdd.2510120507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bowker-Kinley MM, Davis WI, Wu P, et al. Evidence for existence of tissue-specific regulation of the mammalian pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Biochem J. 1998;329(Pt 1):191–196. doi: 10.1042/bj3290191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Cairns RA, Papandreou I, Sutphin PD, et al. Metabolic targeting of hypoxia and HIF1 in solid tumors can enhance cytotoxic chemotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:9445–9450. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611662104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Stockwin LH, Yu SX, Borgel S, et al. Sodium dichloroacetate selectively targets cells with defects in the mitochondrial ETC. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2510–2519. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1. Expression of basal and luminal markers in MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors and normal mammary epithelium. (A) Representative immunofluorescence staining of paraffin embedded MMTV-Wnt-1 breast tumors with antibodies against Krt14 (red) and Krt18 (green). (B) Flow cytometry analysis of first generation tumor from which CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells were isolated by flow cytometry sorter. Cells in the circle were injected in mice and resulted in second generation tumors in C. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of a representative second generation tumor initiated by purified CD49fhigh Epcamlow cells. Only viable, single, lineage negative cells are shown. (D) Flow cytometry analysis of CD49f, Epcam, and CD24 in MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors. The CD49fhigh Epcamlow are also CD49fhighCD24high but Epcam expression more clearly separates TICs and NTCs than CD24 expression does. (E) Expression of TIC and NTC markers in purified CD49fhighCD24high and CD49flowCD24low cells using qRT-PCR.
Figure S2 RNA-Seq analysis of TICs and NTCs. (A) Scatter plot showing FPKM values for TICs and NTCs. The blue and green dots represent genes greater than or equal to two fold overexpressed in TICs and NTCs, respectively. (B) Venn diagram of genes expressed in TICs, NTCs, or both. (C) Representative coverage plots for Krt5 and Krt19 in TICs and NTCs. (D) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of metabolism-related gene sets in TICs and NTCs from MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors. Enrichment plots for the gene sets included in Figure 3B are shown. Genes overexpressed by TICs have low ranks (i.e. on left of plots) while genes overexpressed by NTCs have high ranks (i.e. on right of plots).
Figure S3 Preferential targeting of TICs using metabolic inhibitors. (A) CD49fhigh Epcamlow TIC-enriched cells from MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary tumors are more sensitive to glycolysis inhibitors than NTCs. Representative images of spheroid formation in the presence or absences of 1mM 2-DG and 50mM sodium oxamate. (B) Representative images of spheroid formation when DCA is added at time 0 or 3 days after plating. (C) Spheroid counts from experiments in B (n=5). (D) Expression of NTC (Esr1) and TIC (p63) markers in cells isolated from experiments in B. Results were normalized to the untreated control (n=3; p=0.02 and 0.001, respectively).
Figure S4 TICs from MMTV-PyMT mouse mammary tumors display a pro-glycolytic phenotype. (A) Real time quantitative PCR analysis of the ratio of mitochondrial Cox1 and Cox2 loci to the nuclear beta-actin locus. Results were normalized to CD49fhighCD24+ TIC-enriched cells (n=3; p=0.001). (B) Real time quantitative PCR analysis comparing expression of the mitochondria-encoded genes Cox1 and Cox2 to nuclear beta-actin. Results were normalized to TICs (n=3; p=0.03 and 0.02 respectively). (C) Real time quantitative PCR analysis of pyruvate dehydrogenase subunit RNA expression in TICs and NTCs (n=3; p<0.01). (D) Lactate production in TICs and NTCs. Results were normalized to TICs (n=3; p<0.01). (E) Representative images of spheroid formation in presence and absences of 25 mM DCA. (F) Dose-dependent inhibition of TIC spheroid formation by DCA (n=5).
Figure S5 Transciptome analysis for human breast cancer TICs and NTCs. (A) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of metabolism-related gene sets in TICs and NTCs from primary human breast cancers. Enrichment plots for the gene sets included in Figure 7A are shown. Genes overexpressed by TICs have low ranks (i.e. on left of plots) while genes overexpressed by NTCs have high ranks (i.e. on right of plots).
Figure S6 TICs from an independent patient-derived triple negative breast cancer xenograft display pro-glycolytic phenotypes and are sensitive to DCA. (A) Mitochondrial content in human TICs (CD49fhigh Epcamhigh) and NTCs (CD49flow Epcamlow) assessed by MitoTracker (n=3; p=0.003). MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. (B) Real time quantitative PCR analysis of the ratio of Krt5 and mitochondrial Cytb RNA to nuclear beta-actin RNA. Results were normalized to TICs (n=3; p<0.002). (C) Dose-dependent inhibition of TIC spheroid formation by DCA (n=5). (D) Flow cytometry analysis of human breast cancer xenograft from which CD49fhighEpcamhigh cells were isolated. Cells in the red circle (TIC, CD49fhighEpcamhigh) and the green circle (NTC, CD49flowEpcamlow) were isolated and examined for their colony forming abilities in vitro. (E) Representative images of spheroid formation by human TICs in presence and absences of 25 mM DCA.







