Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1974 Mar;9(3):559–563. doi: 10.1128/iai.9.3.559-563.1974

Protection of Chicken Embryos by Viridans Streptococci Against the Lethal Effect of Staphylococcus aureus

Raza Aly 1, Howard I Maibach 1, Henry R Shinefield 1, Adrian D Mandel 1
PMCID: PMC414844  PMID: 4816633

Abstract

Chicken embryos were used to investigate the mechanism by which viridans streptococci inhibit the growth of pathogenic staphylococci. Ten-day-old embryonated eggs were infected allantoically. At a concentration of 1.8 × 102 colony-forming units (CFU) of viridans streptococci, the percentage of fatalities was less than 10%. There was 80% fatality with 8 × 101 CFU of Staphylococcus aureus strain 502A and 100% when a 100-fold increase in concentration was used. An inoculum size of 102 to 103 CFU of viridans streptococci was chosen to protect the embryos against the lethal effect of strain 502A when challenged 24 h later. The survival after challenging at 4 days was 93% in protected eggs and 37% in unprotected eggs. Chicken embryos receiving heat-killed viridans and challenged with strain 502A when examined after 4 days did not demonstrate a protective effect. This protection of embryonated eggs could not be transferred by administration of sterile filtrate of allantoic fluid in which protecting strain was grown. The experimental infection of embryonated eggs has demonstrated that prior allantoic infection with viridans streptococci affords significant protection against subsequent challenge with virulent staphylococci.

Full text

PDF
559

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fredericq P. On the nature of colicinogenic factors: a review. J Theor Biol. 1963 Mar;4(2):159–165. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(63)90024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Johanson W. G., Jr, Blackstock R., Pierce A. K., Sanford J. P. The role of bacterial antagonism in pneumococcal colonization of the human pharynx. J Lab Clin Med. 1970 Jun;75(6):946–952. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Maibach H. I., Strauss W. G., Shinefield H. R. Bacterial interference: relating to chronic furunculosis in man. Br J Dermatol. 1969;81(Suppl):69+–69+. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1969.tb12836.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McCabe W. R. Bacterial interference induced in embryonated eggs by staphylococci. J Clin Invest. 1967 Mar;46(3):453–462. doi: 10.1172/JCI105547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ribble J. C. A mechanism of bacterial interference in vitro. J Immunol. 1967 Apr;98(4):716–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ribble J. C., Shinefield H. R. Bacterial interference in chick embryos. J Clin Invest. 1967 Mar;46(3):446–452. doi: 10.1172/JCI105546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sanders E. Bacterial interference. I. Its occurrence among the respiratory tract flora and characterization of inhibition of group A streptococci by viridans streptococci. J Infect Dis. 1969 Dec;120(6):698–707. doi: 10.1093/infdis/120.6.698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shinefield H. R., Ribble J. C., Boris M. Bacterial interference between strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 1960 to 1970. Am J Dis Child. 1971 Feb;121(2):148–152. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1971.02100130102013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sprunt K., Redman W. Evidence suggesting importance of role of interbacterial inhibition in maintaining balance of normal flora. Ann Intern Med. 1968 Mar;68(3):579–590. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-68-3-579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Strauss W. G., Maibach H. I., Shinefield H. R. Bacterial interference treatment of recurrent furunculosis. 2. Demonstration of the relationship of strain to pathogeneicity. JAMA. 1969 May 5;208(5):861–863. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. TROLLER J. A., FRAZIER W. C. Repression of Staphylococcus aureus by food bacteria. II. Causes of inhibition. Appl Microbiol. 1963 Mar;11:163–165. doi: 10.1128/am.11.2.163-165.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES