Skip to main content
Standards in Genomic Sciences logoLink to Standards in Genomic Sciences
. 2014 Apr 20;9(3):933–939. doi: 10.4056/sigs.3887716

The Genome Sequence of a Type ST239 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolate from a Malaysian Hospital

LS Lee 1,3, LK Teh 1,2, ZF Zainuddin 3, MZ Salleh 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC4148954  PMID: 25197474

Abstract

We report the genome sequence of a healthcare-associated MRSA type ST239 clone isolated from a patient with septicemia in Malaysia. This clone typifies the characteristics of ST239 lineage, including resistance to multiple antibiotics and antiseptics.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, Malaysia, Genomics

Introduction

Antibiotic resistance in S. aureus is a major concern, as an increasing number of infections are caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic position of S. aureus in relation to other staphylococci. In Malaysia, the incidence of MRSA-related infections is a cause of concern in hospitals country-wide. Health-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) has been dominated by a few lineages in Southeast Asia, particularly ST239. Sequence type 239 is an international healthcare-associated (HA) MRSA lineage prevalent in Asia, South America and Eastern Europe, which includes EMRSA-1, -4, -7, and -11 and the Brazilian, Portuguese, Hungarian, and Viennese clones. Strains of type ST239 are typically resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics and antiseptics such as β-lactam antibiotics.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Staphylococcus aureus strain PR01 relative to other type strains within the Staphylococcaceae. The strains and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA genes are: S. aureus strain ATCC 12600, L36472; S. saprophyticus strain ATCC 15305, AP008934; S. epidermidis strain ATCC 14990, D83363; S. hominis strain DSM 20328, X66101; S. haemolyticus strain CCM2737, X66100; and S. cohnii strain ATCC 49330, AB009936. The tree uses sequences aligned by the RDP aligner, and uses the Jukes-Cantor corrected distance model to construct a distance matrix based on alignment model positions without the use of alignment inserts, and uses a minimum comparable position of 200. The tree is built with RDP Tree Builder, which uses Weighbor [1] with an alphabet size of 4 and length size of 1000. The building of the tree also involves a bootstrapping process repeated 100 times to generate a majority consensus tree [2]. Staphylococcus lutrae (X84731) was used as an outgroup.

Classification and features

We have chosen a representative of an MRSA strain, termed MRSA PR01 isolated from a patient with septicemia, isolated from a hospital in Kuala Lumpur. Table 1 indicates general information gathered on MRSA PR01. The MRSA PR01 strain has been identified as sequence type 239 (ST239) by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Initial disc susceptibility tests showed that the strain is resistant to β-lactam antibiotics oxacillin, ampicillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, gentamicin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole.

Table 1. Classification and general features of Staphylococcus aureus MRSA PR01.

MIGS ID       Property       Term      Evidence codea
      Current classification       Domain Bacteria
      Phylum Firmicutes
      Class Bacilli
      Order Bacillales
      Family Staphylococcaceae
      Genus Staphylococcus
      Species Staphylococcus aureus
      Type strain MRSA PR01
      [3]
      [4-7]
      [8,9]
      [6,10]
      [9,11]
      [6,12]
      [6,12]
     TAS
      Gram stain       Positive      TAS
      Cell shape       Coccus      TAS
      Motility       Non-motile      TAS
      Sporulation       Non-sporulating      TAS
      Temperature range       Mesophile      TAS
      Optimum temperature       30-37°C      TAS
      Carbon source       Glucose      TAS
      Energy source       Chemoorganotrophic
      Terminal electron receptor
MIGS-6       Habitat       Human respiratory tract, skin      TAS
MIGS-6.3       Salinity
MIGS-22       Oxygen       Facultative anaerobe      TAS
MIGS-15       Biotic relationship
MIGS-14       Pathogenicity       Opportunistic pathogen      TAS
MIGS-4       Geographic location       Malaysia      IDA
MIGS-5       Sample collection time       May 2009      IDA
MIGS-4.1       Latitude       4.1936°N      IDA
MIGS-4.2       Longitude       103.7249°E      IDA
MIGS-4.3       Depth       Not reported      IDA
MIGS-4.4       Altitude       Not reported      IDA

a) Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [13].

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing as a representative of MRSA infection in a local Malaysian hospital. The genome sequences of this organism were deposited in GenBank (WGS database). Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed at the Integrative Pharmacogenomics Centre (PROMISE), UiTM. Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [14].

Table 2. Project information.

MIGS ID      Property      Term
MIGS-31      Finishing quality      Non-contiguous Finished
MIGS-28      Libraries used      One 350bp Illumina GAIIx genomic library
MIGS-29      Sequencing platforms      Illumina GAIIx, Sanger
MIGS-31.2      Fold coverage      >200×
MIGS-30      Assemblers      CLCBio Genomics Workbench
MIGS-32      Gene calling method      Glimmer and GeneMark
     Genome Database release      DDBJ/EMBL/Genbank/
     Genbank ID      ANPO01000000
     Genbank Date of Release      January 11, 2014
     GOLD ID
     Project relevance      Medical, Tree of life

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

MRSA PR01 was grown overnight under aerobic conditions in Tryptic Soy Broth at 37°C. DNA extraction was performed using MasterPure™ Gram Positive DNA Purification Kit (Epicentre, Madison, USA) as per manufacturer's instructions. The concentration and purity of resultant DNA was assessed by UV spectrophotometry (Nanodrop, Thermo Scientific). 5 µg of genomic DNA (A260/280 = 1.88) was used for library preparation.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome sequence was obtained using 104 Mb of paired-end (300 bp spacing) data from the Illumina GAIIx platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with 36-bp reads. Sequence data were assembled using CLCBio Genomics Workbench (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). One hundred and ninety-five contigs (N50: 13,272 bp) were generated, and were overlaid with the reference sequence Mu50 using OSLay. Fourteen supercontigs were generated as a result. Gaps were closed using Sanger sequencing.

Genome annotation

The genome was annotated using BASys [15] and RAST [16].

Genome properties

The MRSA PR01 genome consists of a 2,725,110-bp circular chromosome with a GC content of 32.6% (Table 3). The MRSA PR01 genome contains 2668 CDs with 19 rRNA features (). A total of 1722 (64.5%) of protein coding genes were assigned to COGs, and a breakdown of the functional assignment of COG-assigned genes is shown in Table 4. Plasmid sequences were only partially sequenced. Figure 2 depicts genomic regions of interest found in the preliminary analysis of the MRSA PR01 genome.

Table 3. Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the MRSA PR01 genome.

Attribute       Value        % of totala
Genome size (bp)       2,725,110
DNA G+C content (bp)       888,386        32.6
Total genes       2687
RNA genes       19        0.7
Protein-coding genes       2668        99.3
Genes assigned to COGs       1722        64.5

a) The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Table 4. Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories.

Code     Value     %agea      Description
J     140     5.247      Translation
A     -     -      RNA processing and modification
K     127     4.760      Transcription
L     126     4.723      Replication, recombination and repair
B     -     -      Chromatin structure and dynamics
D     23     0.862      Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y     -     -      Nuclear structure
V     -     -      Defense mechanisms
T     47     1.762      Signal transduction mechanisms
M     91     3.411      Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N     4     0.150      Cell motility
Z     0     0      Cytoskeleton
W     0     0      Extracellular structures
U     0     0      Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O     72     2.699      Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C     106     3.973      Energy production and conversion
G     129     4.835      Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E     186     6.972      Amino acid transport and metabolism
F     68     2.549      Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H     83     3.111      Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I     62     2.324      Lipid transport and metabolism
P     123     4.610      Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q     23     0.862      Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R     193     7.234      General function prediction only
S     119     4.460      Function unknown
-     946     35.457      Not in COGs

a) The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Visual representation of the MRSA PR01 genome. From outer to inner tracks: Scale (in bases); annotated CDSs colored according to predicted function (refer to legend); forward strand CDS; reverse strand CDS; GC skew.

Initial analysis of the genome revealed several key features. This genome has a typical SCCmec type III cassette, containing cadmium resistance genes. SCCmec type III is a composite element that is comprised of SCCmec and SCCmercury. In the MRSA PR01 genome, like others, this region harbors ccrC, pI258 and Tn554 as well as the genes involved in cadmium resistance. The MRSA PR01 genome contains two pathogenicity islands, and several resistance features were identified such as the qacA gene, which confers resistance to antiseptics such as cationic biocides, quaternary ammonium salts, and diamidines via an export-mediated mechanism, and the norA gene which confers resistance to hydrophilic quinolones such as norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin. There were 9 regions defined as prophage regions by PHAST [17] with one complete prophage region.

Conclusion

This study is the first to report on the whole genome sequence of a Malaysian MRSA isolate. Preliminary analysis of the genome has highlighted the genetic determinants that are responsible for the organism to adapt easily to selective pressures. Further research is being conducted to provide insight on the adaptive power of this healthcare-associated strain to attain high resistance to antibiotics.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession ANPO00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, ANPO01000000.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank BioEasy Sdn. Bhd. and Illumina for providing technical advice. This project was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (Grant no. 600-RMI/ST/FRGS 5/3/Fst (58/2010))

Abbreviations

MRSA

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

References

  • 1.Bruno WJ, Socci ND, Halpern AL. Weighted neighbor joining: a likelihood-based approach to distance-based phylogeny reconstruction. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:189-197 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cole JR, Chai B, Farris RJ, Wang Q, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Bandela AM, Cardenas E, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM. The ribosomal database project (RDP-II): introducing my RDP space and quality controlled public data. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:D169-D172 10.1093/nar/gkl889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576-4579 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119-169. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Murray RGE. The Higher Taxa, or, a Place for Everything...? In: Holt JG (ed), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, First Edition, Volume 1, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1984, p. 31-34. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420 10.1099/00207713-30-1-225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gibbons NE, Murray RGE. Proposals Concerning the Higher Taxa of Bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 28:1-6 10.1099/00207713-28-1-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB. Class I. Bacilli class nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009, p. 19-20. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.List Editor List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. List no. 132. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:469-472 10.1099/ijs.0.022855-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Prévot AR. In: Hauderoy P, Ehringer G, Guillot G, Magrou. J., Prévot AR, Rosset D, Urbain A (eds), Dictionnaire des Bactéries Pathogènes, Second Edition, Masson et Cie, Paris, 1953, p. 1-692. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schleifer KH, Bell JA. Family VIII. Staphylococcaceae fam. nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009, p. 392. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Judicial Commission Opinion 17. Conservation of the Generic name Staphylococcus Rosenbach, Designation of Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach as the Nomenclatural Type of the Genus Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach, and Designation of the Neotype culture of Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon 1958; 8:153-154 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25-29 10.1038/75556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541-547 10.1038/nbt1360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Van Domselaar GH, Stothard P, Shrivastava S, Cruz JA, Guo A, Dong X, Lu P, Szafron D, Greiner R, Wishart DS. BASys: a web server for automated bacterial genome annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33(Web Server issue):W455-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, et al. The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. PHAST: A Fast Phage Search Tool. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39(suppl 2):W347-52 10.1093/nar/gkr485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Standards in Genomic Sciences are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES