Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: Free Radic Biol Med. 2012 Dec 28;56:236. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.12.018

Response to Dr. Moskovitz

Nancy B Wehr 1, Rodney L Levine 1,*
PMCID: PMC4149283  NIHMSID: NIHMS619152  PMID: 23277145

In our technical note entitled “Wanted and Wanting: Antibody Against Methionine Sulfoxide” [1], we pointed out several errors of fact and unsupportable interpretations of experimental observations that were included in a paper reporting attempts to raise a rabbit polyclonal antiserum specific for methionine sulfoxide [2]. The immunogen employed was a corn protein rich in methionine that had been exposed to hydrogen peroxide to convert many of the methionines to methionine sulfoxide. While we do not know the epitopes recognized by the antiserum, we certainly established that there is no specificity for methionine sulfoxide itself. Dr. Moskovitz, the senior author of that paper, now states in his Letter to the Editor that our conclusion of the lack of specificity “has no merit”. He cites several studies that employed the antiserum and found differences between control and experimental samples. He argues that these studies establish specificity. In fact, the cited studies do not report investigations of specificity; they assume that it is specific for methionine sulfoxide based on the claim made in Moskovitz and colleague’s original report [2]. As pointed out in our note, multiple investigators have failed to produce an antiserum or antibody specific for methionine sulfoxide. Both Dr. Moskovitz and we are members of that group of investigators.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Wehr NB, Levine RL. Wanted and wanting: antibody against methionine sulfoxide. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53:1222–1225. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oien DB, Canello T, Gabizon R, Gasset M, Lundquist BL, Burns JM, Moskovitz J. Detection of oxidized methionine in selected proteins, cellular extracts and blood serums by novel anti-methionine sulfoxide antibodies. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2009;485:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2009.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES