Abstract
Background: Tumors involving the root of the mesentery are generally regarded as “unresectable” with conventional surgical techniques. Resection with conventional surgery may end in life-threatening complications in these patients. Ex-vivo resection and auto-transplantation avoids excessive bleeding and prevents ischemic related damage to the small intestine and other organs.
Objective: To share our experience of ex-vivo resection of the tumors with involvement of small bowel mesentery followed by small bowel auto-transplantation.
Methods: In this study, medical records of all the patients who underwent ex-vivo resection and auto-transplantation at our center were retrospectively analyzed.
Results: The most common indication for the procedure in our series was locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Our survival rate was 50% with a mean±SD follow-up of 10.1±9.8 (range: 0–26) months. Causes of early in-hospital mortality were multi-organ failure, sepsis, and cerebrovascular accident. Recurrence of disease was noted in one patient while one patient developed hepatic metastasis after 20 months of surgery.
Conclusion: Ex-vivo resection of the tumor and auto-transplantation is the surgical treatment of choice for the locally advanced abdominal tumors involving the root of the mesentery.
Key Words: Ex-vivo resection, Intestine, small, Auto-transplantation, Mesentery, Neoplasms, Mesentery, Auto-transplantation, Mortality
INTRODUCTION
The progress in the field of solid organ and multivisceral transplantation opens a window for resection of abdominal tumors involving the root of the mesentery by ex-vivo resection and auto-transplantation. Before this, tumors involving the root of the mesentery were supposed to be “unresectable” by conventional surgical techniques without life-threatening complications [1,2]. Conventional methods of surgical resection for tumors involving the root of the mesentery result in resection of large portions of the intestine. As a consequence, patients develop short bowel syndrome and remain dependent on either total parenteral nutrition (TPN ) or need intestinal transplantation for the survival [3]. Ex-vivo resection of tumor and auto-transplantation not only prevent the development of short bowel syndrome but also provide better chance of obtaining tumor-free resection margin. The R0 resection is an independent factor for the long-term survival of the patient after surgery [4,5]. Ex-vivo resection and auto-transplantation has long been in use for other organs such as heart, kidney and liver [6,7].
Therefore, in this study, we aimed to share our experience of ex-vivo resection of the tumors with involvement of small-bowel mesentery followed by small-bowel auto-transplantation.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Between November 2010 and January 2013, 12 patients underwent ex-vivo excision of tumor and auto-transplantation at our center. Data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed from their medical records. All patients were thoroughly examined. Distant metastases were excluded by pre-operative radiological examination and during laparotomy in all but one patient in whom at the end of the procedure a single tiny metastatic lesion was discovered in the left lobe of the liver. Left lobe hepatectomy was done at the same operation to get a disease-free status. In another patient, the mass was found to be completely adhered to the left kidney so the left kidney was sacrificed to obtain tumor free resection margin. Two patients were referred from oncology clinic after receiving gemcitabine-based neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for surgical management of localized advanced carcinoma, but other patients did not receive this treatment. Patients who were discovered to have malignancy or positive lymph nodes on histopathology reports were referred to the Oncology Department for gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy.
Technical Considerations
Complete pancreatoduodenectomy with resection of the celiac and superior mesenteric artery was done in nine patients; in two patients with smaller tumors Whipple procedure was performed (Table 1). In one patient in whom tumor was located in the body of the pancreas, only distal pancreatectomy was needed to remove the tumor completely. The last technical variation is a novel technique and up to our knowledge has not been mentioned earlier in the literature. Unlike other procedures, the duodenum, pancreatic head and stomach were saved and the liver was perfused with an autologus saphenous interposition graft which was anastomosed to the stump of the celiac artery.
Table 1.
Patients’ demographics
| No. | Gender/age | Final diagnosis | Transplanted organ | Present condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F/52 | Pancreatic carcinoma | Small bowel | Expired |
| 2 | F/58 | Pancreatic pseudotumor | Small bowel and liver | Alive |
| 3 | F/32 | Pancreatic carcinoma | Small bowel and liver | Expired |
| 4 | M/45 | Pancreatic carcinoma | Small bowel | Alive |
| 5 | M/47 | Pancreatic pseudotumor | Small bowel | Expired |
| 6 | F/16 | Retroperitoneal rhabdomyosarcoma | Small bowel | Expired |
| 7 | F/56 | Pancreatic carcinoma | Small bowel | Expired |
| 8 | M/46 | Pancreatic carcinoma | Small bowel | Alive |
| 9 | F/55 | Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor | Small bowel | Alive |
| 10 | M/50 | Pancreatic carcinoma | Small bowel | Alive |
| 11 | M/73 | Pancreatic carcinoma | Small bowel | Expired |
| 12 | M/33 | Pancreatic carcinoma | Small bowel | Alive |
The small-bowel resection, right extended hemicolectomy, splenectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) were also performed in all patients; partial or complete gastrectomy was done in 11 patients. All tissue specimens were sent for histopathological examination.
In our series, seven patients required interposition vascular grafts for the reconstruction of hepatic artery or portal vein. Allograft iliac vessels from deceased donors were used in the first two patients while in five other patients, autologus saphenous or external jugular veins were used.
There were various techniques for approaching the common hepatic artery involvement. In the first two cases, the liver was also resected during ex-vivo resection; liver and small-bowel were then auto-transplanted after tumor removal by bench surgery. This technique had an increased risk for developing complications of anhepatic phase, so we changed the surgical strategy. In other patients, the arterial inflow of the liver was replaced with a temporary interposition graft from infrarenal aorta to the proper hepatic artery using autologus saphenous vein before resection of the organs. Later, the proximal end of this bypass graft was repositioned and anastomosed to the stump of the resected celiac artery before small-bowel auto-transplantation.
RESULTS
Out of 12 patients who underwent ex-vivo resection of the tumor and auto-transplantation, males outnumbered to females in a ratio of 2:1. The mean±SD age of patients at the time of surgery was 45.7±14.6 (range: 17–73) years.
Ten patients had pre-operative diagnosis of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma, one had gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and another had retroperitoneal rhabdomyosarcoma (Table 1). Two patients who were operated with pre-operative diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma and who were mimicking locally advanced carcinoma were found to have pseudotumor on post-resection histopathology reports of the specimens. One of them had tissue reaction due to previous ruptured teratoma while the other had chronic pancreatitis with severe peri-pancreatic fibrosis. In one patient tumor tissue closely adhered to the left kidney; therefore, the left kidney was sacrificed to obtain a tumor-free resection margin. Tumor-free resection margins were obtained in all patients on histological examination of the specimens.
Out of 12 patients, 10 had small bowel auto-transplantation; the remaining two had combined liver and small bowel auto-transplantation. After reperfusion, both liver and small bowel reimplanted grafts regain normal color and perfusion.
The mean±SD total procedure time was 714±162 (range: 540–960) minutes. Total cold ischemia time varied between 60 and 210 (mean±SD: 160±68) min; the total warm ischemia time varied from 25 to 65 (mean±SD: 39±18) min. The mean hospital stay was 9.7 (range: 1–24) days.
The two patients who received deceased donor vascular grafts were on immunosuppressive drugs. Both developed surgical complications and died of complications—one developed severe sepsis, probably due to over-immunosuppression; the other developed vascular graft thrombosis and small-bowel gangrene. After this event, we stopped using allograft interposition grafts.
The survival rate was 50%. Six of our patients died during a mean±SD follow-up of 10.1±9.8 (range: 0–26) months. Three patients died during the initial hospital stay. Causes of in-hospital deaths were multi-organ failure, severe sepsis and cerebrovascular accident. Three patients died two months, three months, and six months after the initial surgery. Causes of late mortality were thrombosis of the allograft, late portal vein thrombosis and recurrence of disease, respectively.
Nine patients with malignant disease survived more than six weeks. All of them were referred to oncologist for chemotherapy. They all received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. One patient developed recurrence of disease within six months and died as mentioned above; one patient of pancreatic carcinoma developed multiple hepatic metastasis 20 months post-surgery. This patient had been referred to the oncologist for the systemic chemotherapy.
DISCUSSION
Tumors involving the root of the mesentery are almost always supposed to be “unresectable” by the conventional techniques of surgery for several reasons. In an attempt to get tumor-free resection margins in these patients, either total or subtotal enterectomies have to be performed ending in short gut syndrome. TPN therapy is an option but chronic TPN therapy predisposes these patients to develop life-threatening complications such as line-related sepsis and liver failure [8,9].
These tumors are in close proximity to the major abdominal vessels supplying solid organs and hollow viscera. During resection of these retroperitoneal tumors, mesenteric vessels may need to be tied or clamped at least temporarily to control bleeding in the operating field. Of note, intestinal epithelium is very sensitive to warm ischemia and ischemic changes may appear just after an hour of clamping of the mesenteric vessels during warm ischemia [10]. On the other hand, intestinal epithelium can withstand cold ischemia for 6–8 hours as shown by Takeyoshi and his colleagues, in their experimental surgery in a canine model [11]. This observation is the basis of ex-vivo resection and auto-transplantation in which the University of Wisconsin solution is used to prolong the cold ischemia time without any detrimental effect on the autologous grafts.
There are several advantages for ex-vivo tumor resection and auto-transplantation. Dissection can be done in bloodless field in a timely manner, and thus with better chances of obtaining tumor-free resection margins. Also reconstruction of vascular pedicles can be done if needed and large enterectomies can be avoided with less risk of developing short gut syndrome. After exenteration of abdominal organs, abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space become clearly visible. Any residual tumor or suspicious area can then easily be resected out. Furthermore, hemostasis can be achieved more effectively.
To date, only few studies have been published in the medical literature on ex-vivo resection of tumors involving the root of the mesentery and auto-transplantation [1,2,12-16]. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the largest series ever reported in medical literature.
The underlying diseases for which this procedure has been done in these studies were mesenteric fibroma, vascular dysplasia of the root of the mesentery, desmoid tumor, mesenteric carcinoid tumor, mesenteric cavernous hemangioma and some cases of pancreatic carcinoma. In our series, the most common indication for the operation was pancreatic cancer involving the root of the mesentery. Obviously, malignant tumors need lymph node dissection and a more extended resection compared to benign lesions, which may increase the morbidity and mortality rates in patients with impaired immune system due to malignancy. This may explain the relative high rate of mortality in our patients.
Use of cadaveric grafts to replace arteries or veins made us to use immunosuppressive drugs with all their side-effects. The two patients in whom allogenic vascular grafts were used, developed complications and died. So, we have not used this kind of vascular grafts since then.
In conclusion, with refinement in surgical techniques as well as using neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments, this procedure may lead to further improvement in the prognosis of malignant tumors involving the root of the mesentery. Furthermore, this approach would become the standard surgical treatment for otherwise unresectable benign lesions of the small bowel mesentery.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: None declared.
FINANCIAL SUPPORT: None.
References
- 1.Tzvetanov IG, Bhati CS, Jeon H, et al. Segmental intestinal autotransplantation after extensive enterectomy for removal of large intra-abdominal desmoid tumors of the mesentery root: initial experience. Surgery. 2012;151:621–4. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tzakis AG, Tryphonopoulos P, De Faria W, et al. Partial abdominal evisceration, ex vivo resection, and intestinal autotransplantation for the treatment of pathologic lesions of the root of the mesentery. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197:770–6. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(03)00756-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tzakis AG, De Faria W, Angelis M, et al. Partial abdominal exenteration, ex vivo resection of a large mesenteric fibroma, and successful orthotopic intestinal autotransplantation. Surgery. 2000;128:486–9. doi: 10.1067/msy.2000.107165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fuhrman GM, Leach SD, Staley CA, et al. Rationale for en bloc vein resection in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma adherent to the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence Pancreatic Tumor Study Group. Ann Surg. 1996;223:154–62. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199602000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Van Geenen RC, ten Kate FJ, de Wit LT, et al. Segmental resection and wedge excision of the portal or superior mesenteric vein during pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2001;129:158–63. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.110221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Clark DA, Quint RA, Mitchell RL, Angell WW. Coronary artery spasm medical management, surgical denervation, and autotransplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1977;73:332–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Smith RB, deKernion JB, Ehrlich RM, et al. Bilateral renal cell carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma in the solitary kidney. J Urol. 1984;132:450–4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49687-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nishida S, Hadjis NS, Levi DM, et al. Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation after abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 2004;56:323–7. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000044627.81521.ED. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kato T, Tzakis AG, Selvaggi G, et al. Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation in children. Ann Surg. 2006;243:756–64. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000219696.11261.13. discussion 64-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pappas PA, Saudubray JM, Tzakis AG, et al. Serum citrulline and rejection in small bowel transplantation: a preliminary report. Transplantation. 2001;72:1212–6. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200110150-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Takeyoshi I, Zhang S, Nomoto M, et al. Mucosal damage and recovery of the intestine after prolonged preservation and transplantation in dogs. Transplantation. 2001;71:1–7. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200101150-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Amano H, Miura F, Toyota N, et al. In situ surgical procedures for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: partial abdominal evisceration and intestinal autotransplantation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16:771–6. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0188-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zeng Y, Wu H, Yang JY. Small bowel autotransplantation combined with pancreato-duodenectomy for enormous cavernous hemangioma of the small intestine mesentery. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121:2110–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kitchens WH, Elias N, Blaszkowsky LS, et al. Partial abdominal evisceration and intestinal autotransplantation to resect a mesenteric carcinoid tumor. World J Surg Oncol. 2011;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Quintini C, Di Benedetto F, Diago T, et al. Intestinal autotransplantation for adenocarcinoma of pancreas involving the mesenteric root: our experience and literature review. Pancreas. 2007;34:266–8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31802edee9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kato T, Lobritto SJ, Tzakis A, et al. Multivisceral ex vivo surgery for tumors involving celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1323–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03945.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]