Abstract
Thyroglossal duct remnants (TGDRs) account for more than 70% of anterior neck masses in children and 7% in adults; however, cancer is identified in only 1–2% of the cases. The diagnosis of a TGDR is based on clinical manifestation of a painless, anterior neck swelling, which elevates with swallowing. Cytological evaluation with fine needle aspiration and biopsy (FNAB) may facilitate the pre-operative diagnosis of malignancy, as the majority of TGDR cancers are of papillary histotype. The recommended treatment for symptomatic TGDR without evidence of malignancy is a Sistrunk procedure, which entails en bloc resection of the remnant and the mid-portion of the hyoid bone. The optimal management of patients with diagnosed malignancy is controversial, and in the past, additional total thyroidectomy was recommended for all of these patients. The purpose of this study is to review the literature on TGDR carcinomas, present the evidence on the available diagnostic tools, identify the surgical and post-operative medical management strategies, discuss current controversies, and conclude with a management algorithm.
Keywords: thyroglossal duct, remnant, cancer, thyroid, review
Introduction
During the third week of fetal life, the thyroid gland arises embryologically from a midline endodermal invagination of the foregut, at the level of the foramen caecum. Its tract of descent from the base of the tongue to its final resting place in the anterior neck involutes by the ninth week of gestation [1]. Approximately 7% of the general population has a thyroglossal duct remnant (TGDR) which fails to involute, and more than 50% of these TGDRs contain ectopic functional thyroid tissue [2, 3]. TGDRs, most notably presenting as cysts, are the most common congenital anomalies of the neck. They represent over 70% of childhood midline neck masses, and are three times more common than branchial cleft remnants [4].
TGDR carcinomas are rare tumors that occur in 1–2% of TGDRs [3, 4]. This rare cancer was first reported in the medical literature by Brentano in 1911 and by Owen and Ingelby in the English literature in 1927 [5, 6]. Initially suspected to be metastases from cancers of the main gland, these de novo tumors can exhibit a biological behavior similar to their primary gland relatives. Even though all histologic types can occur at any age, anaplastic, squamous, and concurrent squamous and papillary carcinomas are extremely rare [7–9]. A malignant diagnosis can be made on fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) or intra-operative frozen section (FS); however, the majority of TGDR carcinomas are diagnosed after definitive pathological examination of the excised remnant. The current treatment for a symptomatic or infected TGDR cyst is a Sistrunk procedure, which involves an en bloc cystectomy and central hyoidectomy, with tract excision up to the foramen caecum. However, the controversy for the treatment of this malignant neoplasm evolves regarding the optimal surgical management with regard to the main thyroid gland and the cervical lymph nodes. The main controversies include: 1) diagnostic strategies to provide a definitive diagnosis and enable a single neck exploration, 2) the need for additional therapies after completion of the Sistrunk procedure, and 3) what that further management includes. The purpose of this study is to review the literature on TGDR carcinomas, present the evidence on the available diagnostic tools, identify the surgical and post-operative medical management strategies, discuss current controversies, and conclude with a management algorithm.
Incidence
Thyroglossal duct remnant
TGDRs are the most common congenital cervical anomaly. The majority (50–60%) of cases are found in children under 5 years of age; however, up to one-third appear in patients 20 years or older [10, 11]. Nevertheless, the cyst can be observed at any age and as many as 25% are present at birth [4]. The patients of most concern are those who present with a TGDR after the age of 20, due to the increased incidence of malignancy in this subgroup [4].
Thyroglossal duct remnant carcinoma
TGDR carcinomas are extremely rare and are identified in only 1–2% of all TGDR [2, 3, 12–14]. Originally described by Brentano in 1911, only a little over 250 cases have been reported in the relevant literature [15–17]. These rare malignancies account for less than 1% of thyroid cancers. Despite TGDRs being very common in children and adolescents, carcinomas of the TGDR are rarely present in this age group [16–19]. The peak incidence for women occurs in the fourth decade, whereas men peak later, during the sixth decade of life. Nearly 70% of these rare cancers are diagnosed in adults over the age of 20 [4, 16–19]. Unlike other thyroid disorders, the prevalence of this cancer is equivalent amongst males and females [4].
Embryology and Pathophysiology
Thyroglossal duct remnant
TGDRs arise from the failure of the thyroglossal tract to obliterate in utero. Occurring concurrently with duct lumen atrophy, from the fifth through seventh weeks of gestation, mesoderm from the second and third branchial arches condense and undergo chondrification, to form the hyoid bone, growing from posterior to anterior, and divides the thyroglossal duct tract into suprahyoid and infrahyoid portions [12, 20, 21]. The thyroid gland reaches its final position, just below the thyroid cartilage, by the eighth gestational week [22]. In normal fetal development, the tract of migration persists until the tenth week of fetal development, at which time it begins to obliterate. Failure of the tract to obliterate results in TGDRs: ducts, cysts, fistulas, and ectopic thyroid tissue [10]. Despite being congenital deformities, these remnants are often noticed in the first two decades of life, anywhere along the tract of descent, from the submental region to the suprasternal notch. Formation within the hyoid bone, tongue or mouth floor, are extremely uncommon [4]. The most common site of occurrence is juxtaposed to the hyoid bone (80%) [23].
The tract consists of stratified squamous, pseudo-stratified ciliated columnar epithelial cells, and thyroid cells. The TGDRs may be lined by squamous or respiratory epithelium, and small accumulations of normal thyroid tissue have been identified and reported within the wall of the cyst or tract in 1.6 to 40% of cases [24–26]. It has been suggested that TGDRs are caused by mutations in genes responsible for follicular cell development (the thyroid-restricted transcription factors TITF1, TITF2, and PAX8, and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) [27]; however, to date, there is no definitive proof for this concept.
Thyroglossal duct remnant carcinoma
TGDR carcinomas arise from TGDRs. The majority of these malignancies share a common histology with those of the main thyroid gland. Two thirds of all TGDRs have normal thyroid cells, hence the belief that papillary carcinomas arise de novo from the TGDR, as opposed to representing metastatic spread from the main gland. The absence of parafollicular cells in the ectopic thyroid tissue present in these malignancies provides further evidence for this theory [28, 29]. The duct consists of ciliated squamous epithelial cells, and hence squamous cell carcinoma can also be diagnosed. Papillary carcinoma (PTC) is the most common, as it is in the thyroid gland, ranging between 85.5%-94% [10, 17]. However, mixed papillary/follicular (4.4%), follicular thyroid (1.1%), squamous cell (6.6%), adenocarcinoma (2.2%), Hürthle cell, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas can be diagnosed [16, 18, 30–33]. A case each of concurrent papillary thyroid with squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma, have been reported in the literature [34, 35].
The squamous cell carcinomas consist of squamous epithelial cells, which arise from the cyst wall. These malignancies can arise de novo in older adults, being reported in patients in their sixth and seventh decades of life (55 and 65 years old), or as squamous cell metaplasia of thyroid papillary histotype, in children under 15 years old [7, 8, 18]. The rare case reported of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma of the TGDR in an 84-year-old woman was associated with a benign follicular neoplasm [9]. The one thyroid malignancy that does not occur as a TGDR carcinoma is medullary thyroid cancer, as C cells are not located in the medial aspect of the thyroid gland.
Diagnosis
Clinical Presentation
Patients with TGDR can be asymptomatic with a “lump in the throat”, or report dyspnea or a choking sensation. A history of pain, sudden enlargement of a neck mass, hoarseness, weight loss, or airway compromise is extremely rare, but one that should raise suspicion for malignancy. Up to 60% of patients present with a firm, non-tender, mobile midline mass at, or just below the level of the hyoid bone [29, 36]. In addition to this common location, up to 25% of TGDR are found to the left of the midline, usually along the thyroid cartilage [28, 37]. Other locations along the tract include: suprahyoidal (24%), suprasternal (13%), and intralingual (2%) [38]. The history and physical examination can eliminate other diagnoses, including: dermoid cyst, branchial cleft cyst, cystic hygroma, a Delphian lymph node with cystic papillary thyroid carcinoma, and ectopic thyroid tissue [17, 30].
Recurrent infections, sinus or fistula formation, malignant change, or cosmetic appearance, are all indications for resection. One should have a high index of suspicion for carcinoma, when the remnant is hard, fixed, irregular, or associated with lymphadenopathy [29, 39].
Imaging Studies
Radiologic evaluation of the TGDR for the presence of features suggestive or suspicious of a malignancy begins with ultrasound examination. The cyst presents as an anechoic, hypoechoic, or complex heterogeneous lesion [39–41]. The cancer will appear along the duct wall, as a mural lesion, and may have microcalcifications. Main thyroid gland sonographic examination may confirm an eventual multifocal cancer. On computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the malignant component is seen as a peripheral mass within the cyst, as a solid mass along the thyroglossal tract, or as a complex invasive midline mass [36, 42]. Calcifications within the primary tumor or a metastatic lymph node can also be revealed on ultrasound or CT scans. Ultrasound, CT, or MRI imaging studies can be used to evaluate the lateral and central neck for nodal metastases [42, 43]. Anaplastic or squamous cell carcinomas are best evaluated by cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI).
In euthryoid patients, radioiodine scans may be able to determine if the only functioning thyroid tissue in the patient is within the TGDR (or lingual thyroid). Such findings will avoid inappropriate resection.
Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy
The gold standard diagnostic tool of TGDR carcinoma is fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) performed under ultrasound guidance to ensure sampling of the cyst/duct wall, under direct visualization. This is especially critical in elderly patients, due to their higher incidence of malignancy [42, 44]. When a sufficient yield of cells is obtained, the diagnostic criteria for a cancer diagnosis are the same as those for a malignancy arising from a thyroid nodule. The accuracy of FNA is 90–95% for all thyroid nodules [45, 46]. The incidence of malignancy in a FNAB interpreted as benign is 0–3% [45]. Because the recommended management is different for TGDR carcinomas >1 cm, as compared to a benign TGDR, having a diagnosis at the time of the first neck exploration, can minimize the morbidity of subsequent neck explorations [47].
There is no controversy that every patient with a TGDR should undergo cervical ultrasound to evaluate the thyroid gland and the presence of cervical lymphadenopathy. However, the low prevalence of malignancy (1–2%) does not make performing FNAB in every patient cost-effective or appropriate, especially in children [13, 48]. In a small series, Miccoli et al. reported a 100% sensitivity and specificity, supporting it as a low-cost, operator-dependent test [47]. FNAB is a simple procedure, which would add little cost to the scan; hence, performing it only in adult patients with a residual mass after emptying the TGDR cyst, and in patients in whom there is a high suspicion of TGDR malignancy, may improve its efficacy. Up to 50% of patients can be diagnosed pre-operatively, and this can dictate correct surgical management [29].
Histology
The definitive criteria for a primary TGDR carcinoma are: 1) the carcinoma is in the wall of the TGDR; 2) the cancer must be differentiated from a cystic lymph node metastasis by histological demonstration of a squamous or columnar epithelial lining and normal thyroid follicles in the wall of the TGDR; and 3) there is no malignancy in the thyroid gland or any other possible primary site [49]. The difficulty in meeting these criteria is two-fold. First, the majority of main gland papillary thyroid cancers are multifocal, and some may consider the remnant as part of the entire gland. Secondly, the diagnosis of TGDR malignancy is usually made post-operatively on pathology. When a cancer is only diagnosed in the remnant, this is indeed a TGDR carcinoma; however, when a cancer focus is also present in the main gland it is impossible to distinguish between synchronous de novo TGDR carcinoma and multifocal disease originating from the thyroid gland lesion. Simultaneous TGDR carcinoma and papillary thyroid carcinoma has been reported in 11–40% of cases [3].
Intra-operative Frozen Section
Intra-operative frozen section may play a role in determining the diagnosis at the time of the initial surgery, hence minimizing the necessity for neck re-exploration. Intra-operative frozen section can be performed after completion of the Sistrunk procedure, and if a malignancy is confirmed surgical management of the main thyroid gland can be addressed at that time; as opposed to subjecting the patient to the increased risk of morbidity during a second operation. As with cancer in the thyroid gland, the role of intra-operative frozen section for indeterminate lesions on FNAB is controversial, as the diagnosis of malignancy is not always possible and it may only result in prolonged surgery time [50]. Opponents of frozen section claim that it has been shown to add very little to intra-operative decision-making in thyroid gland surgery [51]. Haymart et al. demonstrated its benefits as a useful diagnostic tool, when FNAB is suspicious for PTC [52]. As literature is lacking clear evidence for both arguments, it is reasonable to recommend that frozen section be utilized in highly suspicious cases, in centers that perform it for thyroid surgery and where there is established such cooperation between the surgeons and the pathologists.
Management
Thyroglossal Duct Remnant
The key parts of the Sistrunk procedure are removal of the central portion of the hyoid bone and any proximal cyst (which may include some portion of the tongue base - the foramen caecum) along with the tissue surrounding it [20].
Thyroglossal Duct Remnant Carcinoma
There are four practiced surgical management strategies for TGDR carcinomas: 1) Sistrunk procedure alone [10]; 2) Sistrunk procedure with thyroid lobectomy or pyramidal lobe resection [53]; 3) Sistrunk procedure and total or near total thyroidectomy in all patients [54, 55]; and 4) Sistrunk procedure and selective addition of total or near total thyroidectomy to high-risk patients [3, 56]. The rationale for adding thyroid resection to every patient with a TGDR carcinoma is based on three aspects: the presence of concomitant thyroid malignancy in the main thyroid gland, the utilization of radioactive iodine (RAI) as an adjuvant treatment, and the role of thyroglobulin, as a follow-up marker [11, 54].
Concomitant main thyroid gland malignancy has been reported to be present in 11–45% of cases [2, 3, 16, 18, 28, 29]. Synchronous papillary thyroid carcinomas in the TGDR and the thyroid gland are multifocal tumors, and hence this risk should be carefully evaluated. Noting the potential for serious complications, Plaza et al. make the argument against the addition of total thyroidectomy [3]. The literature contains several case reports with too few patients treated with a diversity of operative procedures, and hence evidence-based conclusions are difficult to establish. None of the studies describing TGDR carcinomas specifically are case controlled and therefore all management recommendations regarding patients with TGDR carcinomas are Grade C, because they rely on case reports, case series, and expert opinion (level V) [57].
The recommended surgical management of patients with TGDR carcinoma is based on the risk assessment. Similar to well differentiated thyroid gland malignancies, patients are stratified from low- to high-risk based on the revised 2009 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines on differentiated thyroid cancer and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. This stratification is modified to fit TGDR carcinoma based on the literature [54, 58–60]. Low-risk patients have the following characteristics: 1) patient – age over 15 and younger than 45 years, no radiation history; 2) tumor – less than 4 cm in size,; and 3) metastases - no distant or nodal metastases. The majority of the patients fall into low-risk category and for these patients when there are no thyroid abnormalities or suspicious findings a Sistrunk procedure suffices. These patients will have a 95% cure rate with Sistrunk procedure alone and 95–100% long-term survival. High-risk patients are rare and should be treated with Sistrunk procedure and resection of the main thyroid gland via a total or near total thyroidectomy (Figure 1). [54]. Rare patients diagnosed with a squamous cell or anaplastic thyroid cancer of the TGDR, should also be treated aggressively, with a total or near total thyroidectomy, if possible [33, 34, 61].
Figure 1.
Suggested management algorithm for TGDR:
Low Risk:
Patient – age over 15 and younger than 45 years, no radiation history.
Tumor – less than 4 cm in size. Metastasis - no distant or nodal metastases.
* Total thyroidectomy should be performed after the SP when the following findings are evident: not all macroscopic disease resected, microscopic tumor locoregional or cyst wall invasion, or aggressive histology (e.g. tall cell, insular, columnar cell carcinoma).
Abbreviations:
US – ultrasound, FNAB – fine needle aspiration biopsy, SP – Sistrunk procedure, CT – computed tomography, MRI – magnetic resonance imaging, TT – total thyroidectomy, LND – lymph node dissection, RAI – radioactive iodine, TSH – thyroid stimulating hormone, Tg – thyroglobulin
In the majority of the cases, the carcinoma is identified on final pathology following a Sistrunk procedure performed for presumed benign disease. If not previously performed, a cervical ultrasound with careful evaluation of the thyroid gland as well as the central and lateral compartments should be performed. Suspicious thyroid nodules or cervical lymph nodes should be biopsied. Positive work-up warrants total thyroidectomy and involved compartment lymph node dissection. If work-up is negative, completion of thyroid gland resection should be offered only to high-risk patients or patients with the following findings: not all macroscopic disease resected, microscopic tumor locoregional or cyst wall invasion, aggressive histology (e.g. tall cell, insular, columnar cell carcinoma) [3, 28, 29].
There is a consensus on the surgical management of the more aggressive tumors that present with lymph node involvement. Cervical lymph node metastases have a prevalence of 7.7 to 15% [17, 47, 48, 55] and the presence of lymph node metastases warrants the addition of neck compartment dissection. Usually only the central compartment (level VI) requires dissection; however, lateral lymph node dissection may be required if involvement is proven on biopsy or pathology [3, 54, 59]. The role of prophylactic elective lymph node dissection was not investigated in TGDR carcinomas and therefore routine prophylactic central lymph node dissection cannot be recommended.
Adjuvant Therapy
Staging systems used for the differentiated thyroid cancer of the main gland may be applied to TGDR carcinomas and we recommend using the TNM (tumor, nodes, metastasis) staging system, for uniformity. Low-risk patients treated with Sistrunk procedure alone do not require any adjuvant therapy. In contrast, some intermediate and high-risk patients are candidates for thyroid gland remnant ablation following total or near total thyroidectomy. The decision on RAI remnant ablation should follow the considerations of the ATA or NCCN guidelines for the management of well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas [58, 60].
As with the controversy over the extent of thyroidectomy, the benefit of radioactive iodine for low-risk patients remains unclear [62]. Recently, some studies have shown an increase in the risk of developing secondary malignancies after RAI therapy [63, 64]. The most recent ATA guidelines for well-differentiated thyroid gland malignancies recommend remnant ablation for all patients with known distant metastases, gross extra-thyroidal extension, tumor size > 4 cm, or tumor size 1–4 cm who have documented lymph node metastases or other high risk features [58]. These recommendations can also be adapted to TGDR carcinomas. It is thus reasonable to conclude that radioactive iodine may be beneficial for patients with larger tumors and metastatic disease, but the increased risk of secondary malignancies in low-risk patients, including children, where the long-term benefit of radioactive iodine is questionable, means that careful patient selection for RAI treatment is necessary [53, 56, 61].
Follow up
For those patients with a TGDR malignancy, follow-up is required for recurrence surveillance. Annual physical examination, cervical ultrasound, and an unstimulated thyroglobulin level, are sufficient surveillance in the majority of patients diagnosed with a TGDR malignancy. The histopathologic type and extent of disease are used to tailor surveillance to the individual patient. Patients taking thyroid hormone supplementation should be followed, to maintain appropriate TSH suppression [59].
Prognosis
The prognosis of TGDR malignancy is excellent and depends on the extent of surgery, tumor stage, and histology. Since more than 90% of the cancers are confined to the thyroglossal duct itself, a Sistrunk procedure results in a 95% cure rate and 95–100% long-term survival [3]. Patel et al. concluded that for well differentiated thyroid carcinomas the only significant prognostic predictor of outcome is the extent of surgery [55]. Hence, in TGDR carcinomas simple local excision of the TGDR is no longer acceptable. The minimum operation is a Sistrunk procedure, as simple TGDR excision has a significantly lower (75% vs. 100%) 10-year survival [55]. That being said, death is also very rare, even for those patients with extra-ductal extension or lymph node metastases [61, 65].
As expected, patients with papillary or follicular thyroid cancer have a 5-year survival that exceeds 95% [3]. Squamous cell and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas are more aggressive and hence portend a worse prognosis. In the small number of cases described with adequate follow-up, a 36.3% disease related mortality was reported in patients with squamous cell carcinoma [42, 61].
Conclusion
TGDR carcinomas are rare tumors, usually presenting as well differentiated thyroid cancers confined to the TGDR. A Sistrunk procedure is the gold standard for management. As these well-differentiated cancers have similar biological behavior and prognosis as cancers that originate in the main thyroid gland, additional management should be the same for higher-risk TGDR cancers: total or near total thyroidectomy, radioactive iodine remnant ablation, and thyroid hormone suppressive therapy. Anaplastic thyroid and squamous cell carcinomas are very rare and warrant aggressive initial surgical management, including total thyroidectomy with lymph node dissection.
Highlights.
Thyroglossal duct remnant (TGDR) carcinomas are rare and occur in 1–2% of all TGDRs.
Over 90% of patients are low-risk and require Sistrunk procedure alone.
Total thyroidectomy should be added only to high-risk patients.
Adjuvant therapy with radioactive iodine should be reserved for high-risk patients.
Sistrunk procedure results in a 95% cure rate and 95–100% long-term survival.
Acknowledgments
Funding: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Supplemental Grant RO1CA12115-S1.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Conflict of Interest: The authors report no financial or ethical conflict of interests.
References
- 1.Ellis PD, van Nostrand AW. The applied anatomy of thyroglossal tract remnants. Laryngoscope. 1977;87:765–770. doi: 10.1002/lary.5540870512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.LiVolsi VA, Perzin KH, Savetsky L. Carcinoma arising in median ectopic thyroid (including thyroglossal duct tissue) Cancer. 1974;34:1303–1315. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197410)34:4<1303::aid-cncr2820340442>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Plaza CP, Lopez ME, Carrasco CE, Meseguer LM, Perucho Ade L. Management of well-differentiated thyroglossal remnant thyroid carcinoma: time to close the debate? Report of five new cases and proposal of a definitive algorithm for treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:745–752. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2006.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Organ GM, Organ CH., Jr Thyroid gland and surgery of the thyroglossal duct: exercise in applied embryology. World J Surg. 2000;24:886–890. doi: 10.1007/s002680010172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brentano H. Struma aberrata lingual mit druzen metastaten. Deutsch Med Wochenschr. 1911;37:665–666. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Owen HR, Ingleby H. Carcinoma of the Thyroglossal Duct. Ann Surg. 1927;85:132–136. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yanagisawa K, Eisen RN, Sasaki CT. Squamous cell carcinoma arising in a thyroglossal duct cyst. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:538–541. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1992.01880050092022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Deshpande A, Bobhate SK. Squamous cell carcinoma in thyroglossal duct cyst. J Laryngol Otol. 1995;109:1001–1004. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100131871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nussbaum M, Buchwald RP, Ribner A, Mori K, Litwins J. Anaplastic carcinoma arising from median ectopic thyroid (thyroglossal duct remnant) Cancer. 1981;48:2724–2728. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19811215)48:12<2724::aid-cncr2820481228>3.0.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Balalaa N, Megahed M, Ashari MA, Branicki F. Thyroglossal duct cyst papillary carcinoma. Case reports in oncology. 2011;4:39–43. doi: 10.1159/000324405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pacheco-Ojeda L, Micheau C, Stafford N, Marandas P, Luboinski B, Martinez AL. Papillary carcinoma in thyroglossal duct remnants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1991;248:268–270. doi: 10.1007/BF00176752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Telander RL, Filston HC. Review of head and neck lesions in infancy and childhood. Surg Clin North Am. 1992;72:1429–1447. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)45889-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Heshmati HM, Fatourechi V, van Heerden JA, Hay ID, Goellner JR. Thyroglossal duct carcinoma: report of 12 cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997;72:315–319. doi: 10.4065/72.4.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Doshi SV, Cruz RM, Hilsinger RL., Jr Thyroglossal duct carcinoma: a large case series. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2001;110:734–738. doi: 10.1177/000348940111000807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dedivitis RA, Guimaraes AV. Papillary thyroid carcinoma in thyroglossal duct cyst. Int Surg. 2000;85:198–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Weiss SD, Orlich CC. Primary papillary carcinoma of a thyroglossal duct cyst: report of a case and literature review. Br J Surg. 1991;78:87–89. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chu YC, Han JY, Han HS, Kim JM, Min SK, Kim YM. Primary papillary carcinoma arising in a thyroglossal duct cyst. Yonsei medical journal. 2002;43:381–384. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2002.43.3.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gomi K, Kitagawa N, Usui Y, Tanaka M, Yoshida M, Hirata Y, et al. Papillary carcinoma with extensive squamous metaplasia arising from thyroglossal duct cyst in an 11-year-old girl: significance of differentiation from squamous cell carcinoma: a case report. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:e1–e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Allard RH. The thyroglossal cyst. Head & neck surgery. 1982;5:134–146. doi: 10.1002/hed.2890050209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sistrunk WE. The Surgical Treatment of Cysts of the Thyroglossal Tract. Ann Surg. 1920;71:121–122. doi: 10.1097/00000658-192002000-00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Daou R, Aftimos G, Rahayel L. [Papillary carcinoma developed in the wall of a thyroglossal duct cyst] Annales de chirurgie. 1996;50:162–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gray SW, Skandalakis JE, Akin JT., Jr Embryological considerations of thyroid surgery: developmental anatomy of the thyroid, parathyroids and the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Am Surg. 1976;42:621–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brewis C, Mahadevan M, Bailey CM, Drake DP. Investigation and treatment of thyroglossal cysts in children. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2000;93:18–21. doi: 10.1177/014107680009300106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Imhof H, Czerny C, Hormann M, Krestan C. Tumors and tumor-like lesions of the neck: from childhood to adult. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(Suppl 4):L155–L165. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Narayana Moorthy S, Arcot R. Thyroglossal duct cyst-more than just an embryological remnant. The Indian journal of surgery. 2011;73:28–31. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0171-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ward GE, Hendrick JW, Chambers RG. Thyroglossal tract abnormalities, cysts and fistulas; report of 105 cases from the Johns Hopkins Hospital observed during the years 1926 to 1946. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1949;89:727–734. illust. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Macchia PE. Recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of primary congenital hypothyroidism. Molecular medicine today. 2000;6:36–42. doi: 10.1016/s1357-4310(99)01620-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mazzaferri EL. Thyroid cancer in thyroglossal duct remnants: a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. Thyroid. 2004;14:335–336. doi: 10.1089/105072504774193140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Luna-Ortiz K, Hurtado-Lopez LM, Valderrama-Landaeta JL, Ruiz-Vega A. Thyroglossal duct cyst with papillary carcinoma: what must be done? Thyroid. 2004;14:363–366. doi: 10.1089/105072504774193195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mobini J, Krouse TB, Klinghoffer JF. Squamous cell carcinoma arising in a thyroglossal duct cyst. Am Surg. 1974;40:290–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Boswell WC, Zoller M, Williams JS, Lord SA, Check W. Thyroglossal duct carcinoma. Am Surg. 1994;60:650–655. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.White IL, Talbert WM. Squamous cell carcinoma arising in thyroglossal duct remnant cyst epithelium. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1982;90:25–31. doi: 10.1177/019459988209000106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Woods RH, Saunders JR, Jr, Pearlman S, Hirata RM, Jaques DA. Anaplastic carcinoma arising in a thyroglossal duct tract. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;109:945–949. doi: 10.1177/019459989310900527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kwan WB, Liu FF, Banerjee D, Rotstein LE, Tsang RW. Concurrent papillary and squamous carcinoma in a thyroglossal duct cyst: a case report. Can J Surg. 1996;39:328–332. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kinoshita N, Abe K, Sainoo Y, Kumagami H, Takahashi H, Hayashi T. Adenosquamous carcinoma arising in a thyroglossal duct cyst: report of a case. Surg Today. 2011;41:533–536. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4287-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dedivitis RA, Camargo DL, Peixoto GL, Weissman L, Guimaraes AV. Thyroglossal duct: a review of 55 cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194:274–277. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01171-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hatada T, Ichii S, Sagayama K, Ishii H, Sugihara A, Terada N, et al. Intrathyroid thyroglossal duct cyst simulating a thyroid nodule. Tumori. 2000;86:250–252. doi: 10.1177/030089160008600313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Samara C, Bechrakis I, Kavadias S, Papadopoulos A, Maniatis V, Strigaris K. Thyroglossal duct cyst carcinoma: case report and review of the literature, with emphasis on CT findings. Neuroradiology. 2001;43:647–649. doi: 10.1007/s002340000402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ward PH, Strahan RW, Acquarelli M, Harris PF. The many faces of cysts of the thyroglossal duct. Transactions - American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. 1970;74:310–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Glastonbury CM, Davidson HC, Haller JR, Harnsberger HR. The CT and MR imaging features of carcinoma arising in thyroglossal duct remnants. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:770–774. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Falconieri G, Della Libera D, Zanella M. Papillary thyroid carcinoma of the thyroglossal duct cyst: comparative cytohistologic and immunochemical study of 2 new cases and review of the literature. Int J Surg Pathol. 2001;9:65–71. doi: 10.1177/106689690100900114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Motamed M, McGlashan JA. Thyroglossal duct carcinoma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;12:106–109. doi: 10.1097/00020840-200404000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lim-Dunham JE, Feinstein KA, Yousefzadeh DK, Ben-Ami T. Sonographic demonstration of a normal thyroid gland excludes ectopic thyroid in patients with thyroglossal duct cyst. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:1489–1491. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.6.7754899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ducic Y. Thyroglossal duct cysts in the elderly population. Am J Otolaryngol. 2002;23:17–19. doi: 10.1053/ajot.2002.28780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid. 2009;19:1159–1165. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cibas ES. Fine-needle aspiration in the work-up of thyroid nodules. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2010;43:257–271. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2010.01.003. vii–viii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Miccoli P, Pacini F, Basolo S, Iacconi P, Puccini M, Pinchera A. Thyroid carcinoma in a thyroglossal duct cyst: tumor resection alone or a total thyroidectomy? Annales de chirurgie. 1998;52:452–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pribitkin EA, Friedman O. Papillary carcinoma in a thyroglossal duct remnant. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:461–462. doi: 10.1001/archotol.128.4.461. discussion 3–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Widstrom A, Magnusson P, Hallberg O, Hellqvist H, Riiber H. Adenocarcinoma originating in the thyroglossal duct. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1976;85:286–290. doi: 10.1177/000348947608500215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chen H, Nicol TL, Udelsman R. Follicular lesions of the thyroid. Does frozen section evaluation alter operative management? Ann Surg. 1995;222:101–106. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199507000-00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Boyd LA, Earnhardt RC, Dunn JT, Frierson HF, Hanks JB. Preoperative evaluation and predictive value of fine-needle aspiration and frozen section of thyroid nodules. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:494–502. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00221-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Haymart MR, Greenblatt DY, Elson DF, Chen H. The role of intraoperative frozen section if suspicious for papillary thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2008;18:419–423. doi: 10.1089/thy.2007.0272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang Y, Ji Q, Wu Y, Li D, Zhu Y, Huang C, et al. Papillary carcinoma in a thyroglossal duct remnant. Three case reports and discussion on management. G Chir. 2011;32:310–315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kennedy TL, Whitaker M, Wadih G. Thyroglossal duct carcinoma: a rational approach to management. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:1154–1158. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199808000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Patel SG, Escrig M, Shaha AR, Singh B, Shah JP. Management of well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma presenting within a thyroglossal duct cyst. J Surg Oncol. 2002;79:134–139. doi: 10.1002/jso.10059. discussion 40-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wexler MJ. Surgical management of thyroglossal duct carcinoma: is an aggressive approach justified? Can J Surg. 1996;39:263–264. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Guirguis-Blake J, Calonge N, Miller T, Siu A, Teutsch S, Whitlock E. Current processes of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: refining evidence-based recommendation development. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:117–122. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-2-200707170-00170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19:1167–1214. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chen F, Sheridan B, Nankervis J. Carcinoma of the thyroglossal duct: case reports and a literature review. The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery. 1993;63:614–616. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00468.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Network NCC. Thyroid carcinoma Version 2.2013. 2013 [Google Scholar]
- 61.Batsakis JG, El-Naggar AK, Luna MA. Thyroid gland ectopias. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1996;105:996–1000. doi: 10.1177/000348949610501212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.O'Neill CJ, Oucharek J, Learoyd D, Sidhu SB. Standard and emerging therapies for metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. Oncologist. 2010;15:146–156. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Brown AP, Chen J, Hitchcock YJ, Szabo A, Shrieve DC, Tward JD. The risk of second primary malignancies up to three decades after the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:504–515. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Iyer NG, Morris LG, Tuttle RM, Shaha AR, Ganly I. Rising incidence of second cancers in patients with low-risk (T1N0) thyroid cancer who receive radioactive iodine therapy. Cancer. 2011;117:4439–4446. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hartl DM, Al Ghuzlan A, Chami L, Leboulleux S, Schlumberger M, Travagli JP. High rate of multifocality and occult lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid carcinoma arising in thyroglossal duct cysts. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2595–2601. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0571-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

