Abstract
Background and aim
The Greater Poland Region is one of the most industrialised areas of Poland, with a high rate of cancer incidence and mortality. The present report estimated incidence and mortality data for Greater Poland in the year 2010.
Methods
Statistical reports in this study include absolute number of cases and crude incidence rates. The derived age-, sex-, and site specific rates were age-standardised (ASRs per 100,000 person-years) using the European (ASRE) standard population.
Results
In 2010, a total 13,581 new cancer cases were reported to the Greater Poland Cancer Registry. The number of new cases increased by 24% compared to 2001. Greater Poland has the second-highest ASR for both females and males among the 16 regions in Poland. The most common cancers are similar to those in other Western European countries. Among men, the most common cancers are lung (C34), colorectal (C18-C21), and prostate (C61) cancer. In women, breast cancer is the most common (C50), followed by colon (C18-C21) and lung (C34) cancer. Lung cancer in males accounts for more than one-third of all cancer-related deaths in Greater Poland. As in 2009, lung cancer is the leading cause of death in women.
Conclusions
Given the ageing of the population, the incidence of chronic diseases, including cancer, is expected to grow. These data indicate that cancer will continue to represent an important challenge both to local health authorities and the National Health Fund, which will need to meet the growing demand for cancer care.
Keywords: Cancer, Morbidity, Mortality, Epidemiology
1. Introduction
The incidence of cancer continues to rise in Europe as a consequence of population ageing, lifestyle choices (tobacco and alcohol use, physical inactivity, poor diet) and industrial contamination.1 While the incidence of cancer varies from country to country, the incidence rates in Eastern Europe are generally higher than in those observed in Western Europe.1–5
Treating cancer is an expensive proposition requiring sophisticated technology and costly chemotherapy agents and targeted drugs. The most cost-effective approach to cancer control is, therefore, not treatment, but rather early detection and prevention.6 Prevention, however, also requires surveillance through comprehensive cancer registries. Population-based registries provide valuable information on incidence rates and trends in those rates based on tumour localization, sex, and age. In addition, hospital-based registries provide information regarding diagnosis, stage distribution, treatment methods and survival.
The Greater Poland Region is the second largest province in Poland (29,825 km2) and the third most populous (3.4 million inhabitants). Greater Poland consists of 31 administrative districts and 4 cities (Kalisz, Konin, Leszno, Poznań) that function as their own district.7 Cancer surveillance in the region is carried out by the Greater Poland Cancer Registry (GPCR). The incidence to mortality (I/M) ratio—an indicator of accuracy—of the GPCR is 99%, thus making the GPCR among the most accurate cancer registries in Poland.
The aim of the present report is to provide and discuss data on cancer incidence in the Greater Poland Region for the year 2010.
2. Materials and methods
Data for this descriptive study was obtained from the GPCR. This cancer registry has been registering cancer cases in Poznań, Poland since 1980, and for the province since 1985.
The GPCR has been member of the International Association of Cancer Registries since 2008.4 According to the data from the National Cancer Registry for 2010, the GPCR, with a registration completeness of 99% (vs. a mean of 90% in Poland as a whole), registration quality of 85% (vs. 84%) is one of the highest-quality regional cancer registries in Poland. The GPCR includes data from 31 districts and 4 cities with “district rights” (Kalisz, Konin, Leszno, Poznań). Since January 1, 2009, Death Certificate Statistical Cards—which provide essential information related to the patients cause of death—have been sent electronically from all registering points in the country only to a designated Statistical Office in Olsztyn. As a result, this comprehensive information is no longer sent directly to regional cancer registries.
Cancer registration is regulated by Polish law, including the June 29, 1995 law on public statistics (Journal of Laws, 1995, No. 88, item 439, as amended) and the Council of Ministers “Regulation of Statistical Surveys of the Public Statistics” (Journal of Laws of 2010, No. 3, item 14). All cancer registries in Poland collect data, which is reported on the official form entitled the “Cancer Notification Form”. All tumours are coded according to the 10th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD10). All malignancies with the codes C00-C97, and in situ neoplasms (D00-D09) are included in the registry.
Statistical reports in this study include absolute number of cases, crude incidence rates. The derived age-, sex-, and site specific rates were age-standardised (ASRs per 100,000 person-years) using the European (ASRE) standard population. Females account for a majority of the population in the region, with a male:female ratio of 100:106.
3. Results
In 2010, 13,581 new cases of cancer were reported to the GPCR (6722 men and 6859 women). The number of new cases increased by 2655 (24%) compared to 2001 (see Table 1). The growth in cancer incidence increased proportionally by age group.
Table 1.
Year | Male |
Female |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absolute number | Crude rate | ASRE | Absolute number | Crude rate | ASRE | |
2001 | 5367 | 330.8 | 395.26 | 5559 | 323.2 | 299.37 |
2002 | 5584 | 343.6 | 397.00 | 5616 | 326.0 | 292.60 |
2003 | 5749 | 353.4 | 405.33 | 5722 | 331.7 | 294.00 |
2004 | 5908 | 362.6 | 408.02 | 5770 | 333.9 | 294.53 |
2005 | 6340 | 388.5 | 409.52 | 6282 | 362.8 | 304.28 |
2006 | 6513 | 398.3 | 418.26 | 6178 | 356.1 | 296.91 |
2007 | 6749 | 412.0 | 421.51 | 6746 | 387.8 | 319.06 |
2008 | 7086 | 431.3 | 435.28 | 6714 | 384.8 | 309.49 |
2009 | 6964 | 422.4 | 419.77 | 6749 | 385.5 | 311.76 |
2010 | 6722 | 405.2 | 416.50 | 6859 | 389.6 | 324.27 |
The most common cancers in men were lung (C34), prostate (C61), and colon (C18). In women, the most common locations were breast (C50), lung (C34), and corpus uteri (not cervix) (C54) (see Fig. 1).
The total number of all in situ cancers (D00-D09, pre-invasive, stage ‘0’) increased from 216 cases in 2005 to 183 cases in 2006, 278 in 2007, 308 in 2008, 327 in 2009, and 359 in the year 2010.
In 2010, 588 cancer cases (C00-D09) were identified by routine screening tests; this represents an increase of 227 (63%) more cases than in 2009. Of these, 510 (87%) were breast cancers, 34 lung cancers, 16 cervical cancers, 11 colorectal cancers, and 17 prostate cancers.
In the Greater Poland Region, 106 children aged 0–19 were diagnosed with cancer (the crude incidence rate in children is 14 cases per 100,000 population).
According to the Central Statistical Office, 8218 cancer-related deaths were registered in the region in 2010 (4603 in men and 3615 in women) representing an increase of nearly 8% (Table 2). Distribution of cancer deaths by age groups increases proportionally by age, as do incidence rates.
Table 2.
Year | Male |
Female |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Absolute number | Crude rate | ASRE | Absolute number | Crude rate | ASRE | |
2001 | 4178 | 255.8 | 315.04 | 3408 | 197.6 | 175.33 |
2002 | 4193 | 258.0 | 314.17 | 3391 | 196.8 | 171.86 |
2003 | 4266 | 262.3 | 313.37 | 3329 | 193.0 | 165.38 |
2004 | 4550 | 279.3 | 329.70 | 3407 | 197.2 | 166.54 |
2005 | 4345 | 266.2 | 309.35 | 3540 | 204.4 | 169.58 |
2006 | 4572 | 279.6 | 317.57 | 3679 | 212.0 | 174.18 |
2007 | 4570 | 279.0 | 309.07 | 3710 | 213.3 | 171.59 |
2008 | 4606 | 280.4 | 305.26 | 3573 | 204.8 | 160.48 |
2009 | 4545 | 275.7 | 294.33 | 3713 | 212.1 | 164.88 |
2010 | 4603 | 277.5 | 289.55 | 3615 | 205.3 | 156.22 |
The leading causes of cancer deaths reported in 2010 in men were lung cancer (C34), prostate cancer (C61), and cancer of the colon (C18). The leading causes of cancer deaths in women reported in 2010 were the same as those reported in 20092: lung cancer (C34), followed by breast (C50), and colon cancer (C18). The distribution of cancer-caused deaths in males and females is shown in Fig. 2.
4. Discussion
This study provides an overview of cancer incidence and mortality in the Greater Poland Region. In 2010, 13,581 new cancer cases were reported to the GPCC: 6722 cases in males (ASRE 416.5) and 6859 cases in females (ASRE 324.3).4 Importantly, these incidence rates are lower than rates in several other western European countries (excluding females in Spain), including Spain (449.9 and 264.5 ASRE in males and females, respectively), France (550.7 and 369.8, respectively), and Germany (463.2 and 344.5, respectively).8 The number of new cases increased by 2655 (24%) as compared to 2001 (Table 1). The most prevalent cancers in men are those of the lung (C34), prostate (C61), and colon (C18). In women, the most common locations are breast (C50), lung (C34), and corpus uteri (C54) (see Fig. 1).
In Greater Poland, exposure to cancer risk is related to risk agents (primarily tobacco smoke), and population ageing (the number of males between age 50 and 69 increased by 31% and females by 28% in the period from 2001 to 2010). In 2010, the cancer registry recorded 8218 cancer related deaths (4603 men, 3615 women). In terms of the ASRE, the region has among the highest ASRs among the 16 Polish provinces (2nd for both sexes). Efforts to combat tobacco use have led to a decrease in lung cancer, although this site still accounts for 19% of new cases and 29% of deaths in the region. Prostate cancer is the 2nd most common cancer in men, and also shows the highest growth rate.
The poor 5-year survival rates underscore the need for more research and effective prevention. To this end, in 2005, efforts were initiated to expand the national cancer control programme (National Cancer Combat Programme “Improvement of the cancer data collection and registration system”) to assess the level of public knowledge of health promoting behaviours and to raise public awareness of cancer by disseminating informational materials and organising media campaigns to promote a healthy lifestyle.
The main challenges of Polish oncology are to improve patient access to prompt diagnosis, followed by timely, comprehensive, and accurate treatment.9,10 To fulfil this aim, additional and regular investment in oncology hospitals is necessary.11 Similarly, in order to gather reliable data, improvements in the r quality of cancer registration is essential.12 Early prevention plays a vital role in combating cancer and should be linked with educational activities. However, despite the many achievements made in recent years, one factor that has not been well-addressed, especially in the public health sector, is patient comfort.13
Sound knowledge of the patterns of cancer incidence and mortality is essential to establish policies for cancer control among the various countries and regions of Europe. Incidence rates for lung cancer in men have began to decrease in some European countries, particularly in those countries (e.g., areas of North-Western Europe where smoking prevalence first began to diminish). This is not, however, the case for Eastern European females, in whom rates are still rising. Similarly, incidence and mortality rates in women, who acquired the smoking habit later than men, are now on the rise in a number of European countries. Hence, lung cancer retains its status as the most common cancer in Europe, as well as the leading cause of cancer death. The lessons for primary prevention, through efforts to decrease tobacco smoking, are obvious. Such measures will have an impact upon other tobacco-related cancers too, including cancer of the oral cavity and pharynx, oesophagus, pancreas, larynx and urinary tract.
A reduction in alcohol consumption would reduce the risk of neoplasms of the upper digestive system and respiratory tract. Likewise, there is scope to prevent colorectal and breast cancer—the second and third most common cancers in Europe, respectively—through diet modification and, particularly for breast cancer, by reducing the prevalence of obesity. Compared to previous estimates,14 there is also clear evidence that preventative interventions have had an impact on cancer incidence and mortality, particularly in the more affluent countries. For instance, the decline in cervical cancer observed in several of the Nordic countries can be attributed to the effectiveness of national screening programmes. Similarly, effective treatment of testicular tumours has led to a reduction in death rates in many European countries during the last decade.
Cancer registries allow for the follow up of treatment results.15 Moreover, evaluation of clinical results using cancer registry data is not only limited to a particular institution but instead enables us to perform inter-institutional comparison between oncology hospitals.
The morbidity and mortality forecast for 2020, established according to an exponential model based on data from 1999 to 2010, indicates that the GPCR will record 19,000 new cancer cases (9810 in men and 9145 in women), while 57,000 patients will be under oncologist care (Fig. 3). Cancer-caused mortality in 2020 is predicted to be 9500 (5253 men and 4184 women).
The predicted increase in cancer incidence for Poland in 2019 is expected to result from demographic changes, the influence of certain cancer risk factors, and participation in screening programmes.15,16
5. Conclusions
Population ageing combined with gradually increasing survival rates (due to improvements in diagnosing and treating cancer patients) will require continuation of the anti-cancer programmes in the Greater Poland province. This will necessitate, therefore, ongoing investments to maintain and modernise the infrastructure needed for treatment and diagnostics and funds to continue prevention programmes. Finally, new funds will be needed to treat patients with newly diagnosed cancers.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Financial disclosure
This article was prepared and financed by Greater Poland Cancer Centre.
References
- 1.Jemal A., Bray F., Center M.M., Ferlay J., Ward E., Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA – Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wojciechowska U., Didkowska J., Zatoński W. 2011. Cancer in Poland in ISSN in 2009. Warsaw. ISSN 0867-8251. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wojciechowska U., Didkowska J., Zatoński W. 2012. Cancer in Poland in 2010. Warsaw. ISSN 0867-8251. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dyzmann-Sroka A., Myślińska W., Olenderczyk W. Greater Poland Cancer Centre; 2012. Cancer in the region of Greater Poland, 2010. ISSN 1896-8198, Bulletin No. 9. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Slavec Z.Z., Gaberscek S., Slavec K. The development of nuclear medicine in Slovenia and Ljubljana; half a century of nuclear medicine in Slovenia. Radiol Oncol. 2012;46(1):81–88. doi: 10.2478/v10019-012-0011-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Drummond M.F., Mason A.R. European perspective on the costs and cost-effectiveness of cancer therapies. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(January (2)):191–195. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.8956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dyzmann-Sroka A., Harska A., Myślińska W. Cancer incidence and mortality in Greater Poland Province in 2006 – report. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2008;13(November (6)):287–299. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ferlay J., Steliarova-Foucher E., Lortet-Tieulent J. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(April (6)):1374–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Krystyna S.-W., Rucinski P. The main challenges of Polish oncology. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(5):655–663. doi: 10.1177/003335490812300517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Malicki J. The importance of accurate treatment planning, delivery, and dose verification. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2012;17(March (2)):63–65. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Śmigielska M., Milecki P. Investment in radiotherapy infrastructure positively affected the economic status of an oncology hospital. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2012;17(May (3)):151–156. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dyzmann-Sroka A., Roszak A. Methods of raising data quality of cancer registries. Zesz Nauk WCO. 2012;9(4):163–168. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Malicka A. Analysis of a patient environment during stay in a hospital. Zesz Nauk Polit Pozn Arch Urban. 2012;28:81–96. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bray F., Sankila R., Ferlay J., Parkin D.M. Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 1995. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38(January (1)):99–166. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00350-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Oblak I., Petric P., Anderluh F., Velenik V., Fras P.A. Long term outcome after combined modality treatment for anal cancer. Radiol Oncol. 2012;46(2):145–152. doi: 10.2478/v10019-012-0022-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wojtyś P., Godlewski D., Antczak A. Predictions of cancer incidence in Poland in 2019. Cent Eur J Med. 2013;8(2):185–191. [Google Scholar]