Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2014 Feb 22;46:59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.02.007

Early-Life Social Origins of Later-Life Body Weight: The Role of Socioeconomic Status and Health Behaviors over the Life Course

Tetyana Pudrovska a,, Ellis Scott Logan b,**, Aliza Richman c,**
PMCID: PMC4150352  NIHMSID: NIHMS576794  PMID: 24767590

Abstract

Using the 1957-2004 data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, we apply structural equation modeling to examine gender-specific effects of family socioeconomic status (SES) at age 18 on body weight at age 65. We further explore SES and health behaviors over the life course as mechanisms linking family background and later-life body weight. We find that early-life socioeconomic disadvantage is related to higher body weight at age 65 and a steeper weight increase between midlife and late life. These adverse effects are stronger among women than men. Significant mediators of the effect of parents' SES include adolescent body mass (especially among women) as well as exercise and SES in midlife. Yet, consistent with the critical period mechanism, the effect of early-life SES on late-life body weight persists net of all mediating variables. This study expands current understanding of life-course mechanisms that contribute to obesity and increase biological vulnerability to social disadvantage.

Keywords: socioeconomic status, body mass index, life course, gender

1. Introduction

Research consistently documents the enduring consequences of social environment in childhood and adolescence for life-course trajectories of body weight (Baltrus et al., 2005; James et al., 2006; Langenberg et al., 2003). Socioeconomic status (SES) of the family of origin is a particularly important influence, with children from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds having higher body mass index (BMI) and a greater risk of overweight and obesity in adulthood than children from higher-SES families (Giskes et al., 2008; Khlat et al., 2009; Parsons et al., 1999). Although the long-term effects of early-life socioeconomic resources on body weight in adulthood have been studied extensively, previous research is limited in several important ways. Most longitudinal studies are characterized by a relatively short follow-up, with participants being followed only into young adulthood (Chandola et al., 2006; Parsons et al., 1999) and, rarely, into midlife (Langenberg et al., 2003). Therefore, it is not known whether the reach of early-life SES extends to body weight in later life. When studies do focus on middle-aged and older adults, participants are typically not recruited in childhood but entered the study at midlife, which can obscure differential survival by SES and obesity. Further, in most studies, parents' SES is assessed with one measure, mostly the father's occupation, which does not fully capture the multidimensional nature of socioeconomic environment and does not incorporate measurement error (Baltrus et al., 2005; Langenberg et al., 2003). Another methodological limitation is an overwhelming reliance on retrospective reports of early-life SES that may be subject to recall bias and lead to underestimation of the true effect (Giskes et al., 2008; James et al., 2006). Moreover, few studies have explicitly examined gender differences in the life-course mechanisms conveying the effect of early-life SES on body weight in adulthood and later life.

We use the 1957-2004 data from 5,778 participants in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study to examine how family SES at age 18 (in 1957) affects men's and women's body mass index (BMI) in 2004 at age 65. We explore SES and health behaviors over the life course as mechanisms linking socioeconomic family background and later-life body weight. Using structural equation modeling, we decompose the effect of early-life SES into direct and indirect (mediated) effects and compare the relative importance of each hypothesized mechanism in conveying the effect of parents' SES on offspring's BMI in later life. Moreover, we use multiplegroup analysis to explore gender differences in the effect of early-life SES and life-course mechanisms underlying this effect. Another methodological contribution of our study is modeling SES at each life-course stage as a latent variable to incorporate multiple indicators and measurement error. Finally, the prospective longitudinal nature of the WLS allows us to address the issues of recall bias and selection bias.

2. Background

Body weight is a multi-faceted phenomenon with a contested cultural meaning and complex biosocial antecedents and consequences. The medical and public health discourse emphasizes individual-level health risks and society-wide costs of overweight and obesity (Roos et al., 2012). Yet, the findings on the health consequences of heavier body weight are equivocal and complicated. Zheng and Yang (2012) show pronounced population heterogeneity in the effect of overweight and obesity on mortality depending on the combination of race, gender, and SES. Although heavier body weight is detrimental for some population subgroups, it is protective for others (Zheng and Yang, 2012). Moreover, the health implications of body weight vary across the life course such that the association between obesity and mortality is weaker in later life than in adulthood (Zheng and Yang, 2012). Being overweight and even obese at later ages protects against mortality controlling for health behaviors and health status (Lantz et al., 2010).

Whereas findings about the links between health and body weight are varied, research has consistently documented social inequality in overweight and obesity that are more prevalent among socially disadvantaged individuals compared to persons of higher SES (Sobal and Stunkard, 1989). Thus, socioeconomic resources are an important social influence on body weight (Drewnowski, 2009). The American Medical Association has recently classified obesity as a disease, which can lead to even greater medicalization of body weight and underestimation of its social antecedents and consequences. In this study, we explore the social influences on body weight and apply a life-course perspective to explore the complex mechanisms generating divergent trajectories of body weight among different groups. We focus on the social aspects of body weight while also acknowledging the close link of social factors with intertwined behavioral, psychological, and biological processes.

2.1. Mechanisms Linking Early-Life SES and Body Weight in Later Life

A life-course perspective focuses on long-term trajectories of individual development and enduring influences of past experiences. We adopt a dynamic view of SES and emphasize a lifelong approach to the gendered processes underlying socioeconomic disparities in body weight. In this study, SES is considered as a trajectory characterized by long-term patterns of stability and change (Pearlin et al., 2005). Moreover, the life-course approach underscores that health in later life cannot be explained solely by temporally proximate conditions because earlier experiences and characteristics have long-term implications for later well-being (Pearlin et al., 2005). Within the life-course perspective, three major conceptual mechanisms are proposed to explain the relationship between socioeconomic circumstances and health: the critical period model, the accumulation of risks model, and the pathway model.

2.1.1. The Critical Period Model

The critical period model (Ben-Shlomo and Kuh, 2002) reflects a biological imprinting mechanism and posits that early-life SES has long-lasting effects on biological and behavioral systems, and these effects are irreversible and permanent. Research suggests that low childhood social class is related to total obesity and central adiposity in adulthood among both men and women, independent of adult SES (Blane et al., 1996; Langenberg et al., 2003). Moreover, the most direct support for the critical period model comes from studies showing that the effect of childhood SES is stronger than the effect of social class in adulthood (Blane et al., 1996; James et al., 2006). A potential mechanism through which early-life environment can become embodied and exert direct enduring effects on later-life body weight is early-life stress. Stress in childhood resulting from low SES can lead to a chronic elevation of cortisol levels, which in turn is associated with metabolic irregularities promoting excess weight over the life course (Bjorntorp and Rosmond, 2000). Moreover, a heightened risk of obesity can be programmed during inadequate prenatal development or via postnatal biochemical disruptions (James et al., 2006). Importantly, the critical period mechanism suggests that early disadvantage can increase body weight decades later by launching long-term physiological changes; thus, early-life stress does not necessarily operate through an immediate increase in childhood weight. Following the critical period model, we hypothesize that early-life SES is inversely associated with BMI in later life, and this association persists net of exposures and behaviors in adulthood. Further, the effect of low early-life SES on higher BMI can be even stronger than the effect of socioeconomic disadvantage in adulthood.

2.1.2. The Accumulation of Risks Model

The accumulation of risks model suggests that deleterious exposures at different life-course stages inflict a cumulative damage on biological systems and, thus, have compounding effects on later-life health (Ben-Shlomo and Kuh, 2002). It is the overall burden of low SES over the life course that contributes to poorer late-life outcomes rather than low SES at a particular life-course stage. Research indicates that socioeconomic circumstances at each life stage have additive effects on body weight (Langenberg et al., 2003; Salonen et al., 2009). Specifically, socioeconomic disadvantage in childhood and adulthood contributes independently to an increased risk of overweight and obesity (Heraclides and Brunner, 2010; James et al., 2006). Consistent with the accumulation of risks model, we hypothesize that SES in adolescence and adulthood are each related to heavier weight independent of other periods.

Related to the accumulation of risks model is the cumulative advantage (CA) mechanism. According to the CA model, the advantage of some individuals or groups expands over time, which leads to increasing within-cohort inequality with advancing age (DiPrete and Eirich, 2006). The status-dependent CA model suggests that socioeconomic gap in body weight is magnified as cohorts grow older. Research provides support for the CA process, especially among women, indicating that individuals from disadvantaged socioeconomic background gain more weight in adulthood than persons from higher-SES families of origin (Clarke et al., 2009; Giskes et al., 2008). Based on the CA mechanism, we hypothesize that the effect of early-life SES on body weight becomes stronger with age such that BMI grows steeper for persons with low early-life SES compared to those from higher-SES family backgrounds.

2.1.2. The Pathway Model

The pathway model suggests that early-life environment is consequential mainly because it shapes beneficial or harmful life-course trajectories of opportunities and constraints (Ben-Shlomo and Kuh, 2002). Of particular interest is not the direct effect of early-life SES but the mechanisms linking socioeconomic family background to health disparities in adulthood and later life. Research indicates that life-course trajectories of health behaviors and socioeconomic achievement can be important pathways linking early-life SES and later-life body weight.

Health behaviors in early life

Studies consistently document that parents' higher SES is associated with lower BMI and a lower risk of obesity among children and adolescents (Rossen and Schoendorf, 2012). In turn, early-life adiposity has enduring consequences for life-course trajectories of body weight, and children with a higher BMI have a greater risk of obesity in adulthood and later life (Dietz, 1998; Parsons et al., 1999; Salonen et al., 2009). Because childhood body weight is affected by parent's SES and, in turn, affects weight in adulthood, we hypothesize that the effect of socioeconomic family background on BMI in later life is partly mediated by early-life adiposity.

In addition, physical activity (PA) in childhood and adolescence is likely to be a potential pathway linking parents' SES and offspring's BMI in later life. Socioeconomic advantage of the family of origin is associated with higher levels of PA in early life (Gordon-Larsen et al., 2006). In contrast, children from low-SES families have fewer opportunities to participate in sports due to poor availability of local physical activity resources (Gordon-Larsen et al., 2006). Moreover, research shows that children are more likely to participate in organized sports activities in school than exercise independently (Poobalan et al., 2012). Lower participation in school sports among socioeconomically disadvantaged youth also decreases their overall involvement in exercise (Johnston, Delva, and O'Malley, 2007). Therefore, low-SES children are less likely than their high-SES peers to achieve PA level necessary to prevent obesity. Because higher parents' SES increases children's PA, and regular exercise in childhood and adolescence reduces the risk of obesity in adulthood (Parsons et al., 1999), we hypothesize the association between parents' SES and later-life BMI is partially mediated by sports involvement in adolescence.

Health behaviors in adulthood

Early-life SES affects not only contemporaneous PA but also may have a direct effect on exercise in adulthood. The link between PA and weight is complex. To prevent weight gain, 45-60 minutes of regular daily exercise is recommended, whereas for weight loss PA alone is insufficient and needs to be combined with calorie restriction (Goldberg and King, 2007). With respect to the type, PA is typically assessed as moderate (e.g., walking, golfing) and vigorous (e.g., running, bicycling). Both moderate and vigorous activities are effective for weight goals if the duration is long enough to ensure sufficient energy expenditure (Jakicic et al., 1999). These findings suggest that overall higher levels of PA are related to lower weight (Bensimhon et al., 2006; Sherwood and Jeffery, 2000). In turn, higher childhood SES is associated with higher levels of exercise in adulthood and midlife (Blane et al., 1996; Kuh and Cooper, 1992). Thus, we hypothesize that the effect of early-life SES on body weight in later life is partly explained by adult PA.

In addition, early-life SES is linked to tobacco and alcohol use. Parents' social class is inversely related to sons' and daughters' smoking in adulthood and midlife (Blane et al., 1996; Brunner et al., 1999). Because smoking is associated with lower BMI and lower risk of obesity (Kasteridis and Yen, 2012), we expect that smoking suppresses the effect of early-life SES. With respect to alcohol use, some studies report no association between alcohol intake and BMI (Fortier, Katzmarzyk, and Bouchard, 2002; Sammel et al., 2003). Others studies show that heavy drinking increases the likelihood of obesity, whereas moderate alcohol intake is associated with lower weight and waist circumference compared to abstaining and heavy drinking (MacInnis et al., 2013; Wannamethee et al., 2004). Moderate drinking can reduce weight by increasing resting energy expenditure (Klesges, Mealer, and Klesges, 1994) and heat release associated with basic metabolism (Westerterp, 2004). With respect to SES, higher-SES individuals are more likely to be moderate drinkers than abstainers and heavy drinkers (Cerdá, Johnson-Lawrence, and Galea, 2011). Thus, alcohol use can mediate the effect of early-life SES on BMI because higher parents' SES is related to moderate drinking in adulthood, which in turn is related to lower weight.

Socioeconomic achievement in adulthood

An important mediator of the association between early-life SES and adult body weight is SES in adulthood (Gustafsson and Hammarström, 2012; Salonen et al., 2009). Parents' SES is positively associated with individuals' own SES (Sewell and Hauser, 1975), and higher socioeconomic resources in adulthood are related to lower body weight (Salonen et al., 2009). Men and women who experience educational and income disadvantage have higher levels of BMI and an elevated risk of obesity compared to their socioeconomically advantaged counterparts (Beydoun et al., 2009). We hypothesize that the effect of parents' SES on BMI in old age is conveyed via offspring's socioeconomic achievement in adulthood.

2.2 Gender Differences

Women have higher levels of obesity than men and experience a disproportionate burden of diseases and functional limitations attributable to excess weight (Muennig et al., 2006; Wang and Beydoun, 2007). Overweight and obesity have a much greater adverse effect on health-related quality of life and mortality among women than men after age 45, although obese women younger than 45 years have lower mortality than their male peers (Muennig et al., 2006). The relationship between visceral fat and risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes, including increased blood pressure and impaired fasting glucose, is stronger for women relative to men (Fox et al., 2007; Tanaka et al., 2004). Moreover, the adverse social consequences of overweight and obesity are substantially more pronounced among women than men. Heavier weight among women is associated with lower education, lower occupational standing and lower earnings, while this effect is inconsistent or absent among men (Glass et al., 2010; Judge and Cable, 2011).

Given gender inequality in the consequences of overweight and obesity, it is important to obtain a more nuanced understanding of gender differences in the social origins of body weight, which will facilitate the development of effective gender-specific prevention approaches. Research exploring the gendered association between body weight in adulthood and early-life SES (measured as fathers' occupation) yields mixed findings. Some studies suggest that early-life SES is more consequential for adult body weight among men (Langenberg et al., 2003), whereas others indicate that parents' SES exerts a greater influence on daughters' than sons' BMI and obesity in adulthood (Giskes et al., 2008; Khlat et al., 2009). Further, more research is needed on gender differences in life-course mechanisms explaining the effect of early-life SES. Although it is well-documented that women have lower SES than men, engage in PA less frequently, and are less likely to smoke and consume alcohol than men (Denney et al., 2010; Ham and Ainsworth, 2010; Ross and Mirowsky, 2002), little is known about gender-specific ways in which each mediator operates. Given the potential importance of gender as a source of heterogeneity in the link between parental socioeconomic resources and offspring's body weight in later life, this study investigates whether and how the effect of early-life SES and life-course mechanisms conveying this effect differ between men and women.

3. Material and methods

3.1. Analytic Sample

The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) is a long-term cohort study of 10,317 White men and women who graduated from Wisconsin high schools in 1957. Participants were interviewed at ages 17-18 (in 1957), 36 (in 1975), 53-54 (in 1993), and 64-65 (in 2004). This study's analytic sample contains 2,615 men and 3,163 women who participated in the 1957 baseline survey and in the 1993 and 2004 interviews.

3.1.1. Sample attrition

The most important predictors of sample attrition are gender (women are more likely to participate than men), marital status (married persons are more likely to participate than the unmarried), children (parents with more children are less likely to participate), and health (individuals with more chronic illnesses have a higher probability of attrition). Higher BMI is also a significant predictor of attrition because of its positive association with mortality. To take into account potential selection bias, we use the Heckman two-step procedure to create a selection instrument for each of the three reasons for attrition: death, refusal, and inability to locate. Including three selection instruments does not significantly improve model fit; therefore, one variable all reasons for attrition is used in all models.

3.2. Variables

The focal outcome is body mass index measured as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Following recent studies (Clarke et al., 2009; Umberson et al., 2011), we use a continuous measure of BMI rather than discrete categories of overweight and obesity to retain a full scope of variability in BMI. The mean BMI in 2004 equals 28.3 for men and 27.5 for women, with BMI values ranging from 18 to 43. Because height and weight are self-reported in the WLS, we use data from the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to estimate the extent of discrepancy between self-reported and measured indicators of BMI, both of which are available in NHANES (Chang et al., 2009). Among non-Hispanic White adults ages 53-65, we regress measured values of weight and height on self-reported linear and squared values of weight and height, separately for men and women. Then we multiply the gender-specific slopes from these regression models by self-reported measures of height and weight in the WLS to adjust for reporting bias.

Socioeconomic characteristics of the family of origin in 1957 include father's and mother's education measured in years, family income measured in $100's, and father's occupation represented with five categories (unskilled worker, farmer, skilled worker, white-collar worker, and professional/managerial). In addition to individual-level characteristics, we include measures reflecting father's entire occupation: occupational education (log transformed) indicating the proportion of individuals in a given occupation who completed one or more years of college, and occupational income (log transformed) representing the proportion of individuals in a given occupation who earned more than $10,000. To create these measures, proportions of workers with a given threshold of education and income is calculated for each 3-digit Census 1970 occupational code. It should be noted that for families headed by single mothers we include mothers' occupation and occupational characteristics.

Mediators in 1957

Physical activity in adolescence is reflected as sports participation in high school obtained from participants' high school yearbooks. This measure is the sum of the number of varsity sports, club sports, and intramural sports. Body weight in adolescence is measured as relative body mass (RBM) coded from facial adiposity in high school yearbook pictures in 1957 (Reither et al., 2009). Six coders assigned RBM scores separately for boys and girls on scale ranging from 1 to 11. Among individuals who participated in the 1957, 1993 and 2004 waves, yearbook pictures are not available for 839 (15%) of participants. These missing values are handled using multiple imputation based on Bayesian estimation.

Mediators in 1993 and 2004

Physical activity is measured as the frequency of light or moderate exercise (such as walking, dancing, gardening, golfing, bowling) and vigorous exercise (such as aerobics, running, swimming, bicycling) with four response categories: 1 = less than once per month, 2 = one to three times per month, 3 = once or twice per week, 4 = three or more times per week. Smoking is coded as current smoker, former smoker, and nonsmoker. Alcohol use reflects moderate drinking defined based on the 2010 Federal Dietary Guidelines as 1 daily drink for women and 1-2 daily drinks for men.

Socioeconomic status in 1993 and 2004 includes education (the total completed years of schooling), occupation of the current or last job (professional/managerial, clerical/sales/service, and crafts/operatives/laborers), a natural log of household wealth, occupational education (log transformed) reflecting the percentage of persons in a given occupation who completed one year of college or more and occupational income (log transformed) representing the percentage of persons who earned at least $14.30 per hour in 1989. Occupational education and income are created based on the 1990 Census occupational codes using the same procedure as for fathers' measures. Each variable is used as an indicator in a measurement model shown in Table 1.

Table 1. The Measurement Part of the Structural Equation Model Estimating the Effect of Socioeconomic Status in 1957 on Body Mass Index in 2004.
Indicators Factors

SES 1957 RBM 1957 SES 1993 SES 2004
Father's education .739 (.453)
Mother's education .623 (.611)
Family income .672 (.547)
Father's occupation .756 (.428)
Father's occupational education .835 (.302)
Father's occupational income .680 (.536)
Eigenvalue 2.939, χ2 (df) 136 (9), CFI .985, RMSEA .050

Coder 1 ranking .806 (.349)
Coder 2 ranking .777 (.396)
Coder 3 ranking .732 (.462)
Coder 4 ranking .813 (.337)
Coder 5 ranking .816 (.332)
Coder 6 ranking .653 (.573)
Eigenvalue 3.950, χ2 (df) 124 (9), CFI .96, RMSEA .047

Education .719 (.482) .602 (.637)
Occupation .866 (.249) .664 (.558)
Occupational education .862 (.256) .775 (.398)
Occupational income .792 (.371) .652 (.574)
Wealth .676 (.541) .723 (.476)
Eigenvalue 2.703, χ2 (df) 60 (5), CFI .992, RMSEA .044

Note: Each cell contains factor loadings and residual variances (in parentheses). All factor loadings are significant at the .001 level. RBM = relative body mass; SES = socioeconomic status; df = degrees of freedom; CFI = the comparative fit index; RMSEA = the root mean square error of approximation.

Control variables in 2004

We control for several potential mediators to emphasize that the effects of our focal variables are not driven by other important pathways. Marriage, parenthood, and depression are related to higher BMI (Needham et al., 2010; Umberson et al., 2009; Umberson et al., 2011), and individuals from higher-SES background are less likely to be married, and have fewer children and lower depression than those from lower-SES families (McLaughlin et al., 2010; Murphy and Wang, 2001; Torr, 2011). Marital status equals 1 for the married and 0 for the unmarried. Parental status reflects the number of children. Depressive symptoms are based on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (α = .88).

All variables have 2 to 3% of missing values on average. To impute missing values, we carry out multiple imputation procedure using Bayesian estimation in Mplus.

3.3. Analytic Approach

Structural equation modeling (SEM) is applied to examine life-course mechanisms linking early-life SES to BMI in later life. The structural model estimates a direct path from early-life SES to BMI at age 65, and potential indirect pathways via health behaviors in 1957, 1993 and 2004 and socioeconomic resources in 1993 and 2004. We use multiple group analysis to examine whether path coefficients differ significantly for men and women. We estimate a series of models for each hypothesized mediator. The initial model in each series imposes equality constraints such that all structural paths are constrained to be equal for men and women. Then a number of nested models are tested relaxing one equality constraint at a time and comparing the model fit by subtracting χ2 of the less restrictive model from χ2 of the more restrictive model. A significant improvement in model fit (Δχ2 ≥ 3.841 with one degree of freedom) is interpreted as evidence of a significant gender difference in a given path. Parameters in structural equation models are estimated in Mplus 7 using weighted least squares with standard errors and mean- and variance-adjusted χ2 test statistic.

4. Results

The measurement part of the structural equation model is shown in Table 1. Standardized factor loadings and fit indices suggest that the indicators measure each factor well.

4.1. Decomposition of the Total Effect of Early-Life SES into Direct and Indirect Effects

The total effect of early-life SES indicates that higher parental SES is related to lower offspring's BMI in 2004 among both men (β = -.330, p < .001) and women (β = -.740, p < .001), although the effect of early-life SES is significantly stronger among women, as indicated by a highly significant improvement in model fit (p < .001) when this path is allowed to vary by gender. To illustrate, this effect size means an extra five pounds for a woman who is 5′5″ tall and weighs 150 lb. and an extra three pounds for a man who is 6 feet tall and weighs 190 lb. This SES difference in body weight, although modest, can have meaningful implications for health, especially in midlife and early old age when most individuals are already overweight or obese (Mirowsky, 2011).

Panel A in Table 2 shows the mediating effects of early-life health behaviors. RBM in adolescence is a significant mediator of the effect of early-life SES among women. The ratio of the indirect (β = -.199, p < .001) to total effects indicates that RBM mediates 27% of the effect of parents' SES on women's BMI in old age. The mediating effect of RBM is not significant among men because parents' SES is unrelated to sons' facial adiposity in adolescence. Sports participation in high school suppresses the effect of early-life SES on late-life BMI among men (βindirect = .041, p < .01). Although boys of higher-SES families are more likely to participate in sports than boys from low-SES families, greater involvement in high school sports is related to higher BMI among men. The ratio of indirect to total effects suggests that the beneficial effect of higher early-life SES on men's BMI would be 12.4% larger if not for the positive relationship between high school sports and late-life BMI. Both 1957 mediators explain 37.6% of the total effect of parents' SES on late-life BMI among women, whereas among men there is no significant mediating effect of early-life variables. The direct effect of early-life SES remains large in magnitude and statistically significant net of the 1957 variables among men (βdirect = -.286, p < .01) and women (βdirect = -.462, p < .001).

Table 2. Decomposition of the Total Effect of Socioeconomic Status in 1957 on Body Mass Index in 2004 (βmen = -0.330, βwomen = -0.740).

Mediators Direct effect (β) of SES in 1957 Indirect effect (β) of SES in 1957 Ratio of indirect to total effects Model fita

Men Women Men Women Men Women
Panel A: 1957 Variables
Body mass -.282** -.541*** -.048 -.199*** .145 .269 1701 (215), .928, .050
High school sports -.371*** -.732*** .041** -.008 -.124 .011 903 (92), .924, .055
All 1957 mediators -.286** -.462*** -.044 - 278*** .133 .376 1580 (247), .937, .044
Panel B: 1993 Variables
SES b -.159* -.634*** -.171*** -.106* .518 .143 3137 (190), .929, .051
Light PA c -.328*** -.688*** -.002 -.052*** .006 .070 801 (93), .932, .049
Vigorous PA c -.215*** -.605*** -.79*** -.079*** .239 .107 829 (94), .928, .052
Smoking -.328*** -.695*** .034** .011 -.103 -.015 771 (93), .934, .050
Alcohol -.331*** -.714*** .001 -.026** -.003 .035 829 (93), .927, .052
All 1993 mediators -.218* -.483*** -.112* -.257*** .339 .347 2857 (292), .918, .055
Panel C: 2004 Variables
SES b -.220*** -.678*** -.110** -.062 .333 .084 1587 (184), .923, .051
Light PA c -.339*** -.749*** .009 .009 -.027 -.012 943 (94), .929, .056
Vigorous PA c -.282*** -.664*** -.012** -.020*** .036 .027 932 (93), .928, .055
Smoking -.316*** -.727*** .022 .042 -.067 -.057 914 (93), .919, .055
Alcohol use -.298*** -.708*** -.032** -.032** .097 .043 880 (94), .923, .053
All 2004 mediators -.191* -.448*** -.139* -.292*** .421 .395 3039 (296), .918, .056

Note: All models adjust for marital status, the number of children, and depressive symptoms in 2004 and the hazard of attrition.

*

p < .05.

**

p<.01.

***

p<.001.

a

Indices of model fit include χ2 and degrees of freedom in parentheses, the comparative fit index (CFI), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA).

b

SES = socioeconomic status.

c

PA = physical activity.

Panel B in Table 2 shows the indirect effects of early-life SES via midlife SES and health behaviors. SES in 1993 is a significantly stronger mediator of the effect of parents' SES on sons' (βindirect = -.171, p < .001) than daughters' (βindirect = -.106, p < .05) BMI in late life. Socioeconomic resources at midlife mediate 52% and 14% of the total effect of early-life SES on BMI among men and women, respectively. Light PA is a significant mediator of the effect of early-life SES among women only, whereas vigorous PA mediates the association between parents' SES and late-life BMI similarly among men and women. Smoking suppresses the effect of early-life SES on men's late-life BMI (βindirect = .034, p < .01). Men with higher-SES backgrounds are less likely to smoke than their lower-SES peers, and smoking is related to lower BMI. Among women, smoking is not a significant mediator because parents' SES is unrelated to daughters' smoking at midlife. Finally, being a moderate drinker explains 3.5% of the effect of early-life SES on BMI among women (βindirect = -.026, p < .01), whereas there is no mediating effect of moderate drinking among men. All 1993 mediators explain 35% of the effect of early-life SES among women and 34% among men. The direct effect of early-life SES net of all 1993 variables and controls equals -.218 (p < .05) among men and -.483 (p < .001) among women.

Panel C in Table 2 decomposes the total effect of early-life SES into direct and indirect effects via mediators in 2004. SES at age 65 mediates 33% of the effect of early-life SES among men (βindirect = -.100, p < .01), while not being a significant mediator among women. Light PA and smoking in 2004 do not mediate the effect of early-life SES on BMI at age 65. Vigorous PA explains a small but significant proportion of the total effect of early-life SES among men (3.6%) and women (2.7%). Finally, moderate drinking plays a similar mediating role among men and women (βindirect = -.032, p < .01). All 2004 mediators explain 39.5% of the total effect of early-life SES among women and 42% among men, and the direct effect of early-life SES remains statistically significant among men (βdirect = -.191, p < .05) and especially among women (βdirect = -.448, p < .001). We could not estimate a structural model in which all mediators (1957, 1993, and 2004) were included simultaneously because the model did not converge. A path analytic model that does not incorporate the measurement model and includes all indicators (available upon request) indicates that the effect of early-life SES on BMI in 2004 is statistically significant net of all mediating and control variables (βmen = -0.179, p < .05; βwomen = -0.305, p < .01).

4.2. Life-Course Trajectories of SES and Body Weight

Table 3 presents the results from models analyzing the effect of early-life SES and mediators in 1957 and 1993 on change in BMI between 1993 (age 54) and 2004 (age 65). Parents' SES predicts daughters' change in BMI between midlife and old age. Although BMI increases for everyone during this period, the increase in BMI is less pronounced among women from higher-SES family backgrounds than their peers from low-SES families (β = -.163, p < .01). Further, women's higher RBM in adolescence is associated with a steeper increase in BMI between 1993 and 2004 (β = .136, p < .05). In contrast, early-life SES and RBM are unrelated to BMI change in men. The only significant predictor among men is midlife SES, which is associated negatively with an increase in BMI from midlife to old age. The findings for BMI change are consistent with patterns for BMI in 2004 and suggest that early-life SES is more consequential for women's adult BMI, whereas own SES is more important for men's BMI.

Table 3. The Effects of Early-Life Socioeconomic Status and Mediators on Change in Body Mass Index between 1993 and 2004.

Men Women Model fit a
1957 Variables:
SES b -.048 -.163** 729 (86), .935, .055
Body mass .025 .136* 1609 (246), .939, .045
High school sports .011 .040 1015 (108), .924, .053
1993 Variables:
SES b -.222*** .073 1807 (214), .928, .051
Light PA c -.032 -.032 1067 (134), .926, .051
Vigorous PA c -.036 -.036 1120 (134), .931, .050
Smoking .005 .005 1136 (134), .920, .051
Alcohol use -.007 -.007 1188 (133), .924, .052

Note: All models adjust for marital status, the number of children, and depressive symptoms in 2004 and the hazard of attrition.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.

a

Indices of model fit include χ2 and degrees of freedom in parentheses, the comparative fit index (CFI), and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA).

b

SES = socioeconomic status.

c

PA = physical activity.

Figure 1 shows estimates from a structural equation model including body mass at three time points to explore the extent to which adiposity at age 18 and 53 mediates the effect of early-life SES on BMI at age 64. Parental SES has a significant direct effect on daughters' BMI in old age (β = -.119, p < .05), whereas the direct effect of early-life SES on men's late-life BMI is not significant. The indirect effect of SES in 1957 on BMI in 2004 via midlife BMI equals -.241 for men and -.401 for women (p < .001 for both). Given that parents' SES is unrelated to sons' body mass in yearbook pictures, the indirect effect of SES in 1957 via adiposity in adolescence is significant among women only (βindirect = -.021, p < .05). Finally, among women only, early-life SES is linked to late-life BMI by affecting body mass in adolescence, which in turn influences BMI in midlife (βindirect = -.199, p < .001).

Fig. 1. The Effects of Socioeconomic Status over the Life Course on Body Weight in 2004.

Fig. 1

Note: m = men; w = women; ns = not significant at the .05 level. SES = socioeconomic status. BMI = body mass index. *p < .05. ***p < .001.

Figure 2 illustrates a structural equation model that estimates the effects of SES at three life-course periods on BMI in old age. SES in 1957 and 1993 are related significantly and negatively to BMI in 2004 independent of each other, whereas SES in 2004 is unrelated to contemporaneous BMI. Moreover, among women, the effect of early-life SES (β = -.563, p < .001) is stronger than the effect of midlife SES (β = -.289, p < .001). In contrast, among men, SES in 1993 has a more pronounced effect on BMI (β = -.436, p < .001) than SES in adolescence (β = -.180, p < .05). Finally, SES in 1993 is a significant mediator of the effect of early-life SES for men (βindirect = -.155, p < .001) and women (βindirect = -.107, p < .05).

Fig. 2. The Effect of Socioeconomic Status in 1957 on Life-Course Trajectories of Body Weight.

Fig. 2

Note: m = men; w = women; ns = not significant at the .05 level. SES = socioeconomic status. RBM = relative body mass. BMI = body mass index. *p < .05. ***p < .001.

5. Discussion

This study documents an enduring effect of socioeconomic family background on body weight in midlife and later life among men and women. Our central finding that lower SES in adolescence is related to higher BMI decades later contributes to a growing body of evidence documenting the long reach of childhood socioeconomic environment (Gustafsson and Hammarström, 2012; James et al., 2006; Langenberg et al., 2003). It is important to emphasize that unequal trajectories of high- and low-SES individuals originate in early life and are “anchored in conditions that long antecede the decades in which these trajectories take shape” (Pearlin et al., 2005, p. 207).

Our findings indicate that childhood socioeconomic disadvantage has a stronger adverse effect on women's than men's body weight in adulthood and later life. Men and women in our study came of age in 1950s and 1960s, experiencing a traditional gender-typed division of labor. Health management of family members and competence in health-related matters are commonly viewed as women's domain (Reczek and Umberson, 2012). Thus, higher-SES parents may have emphasized healthy weight management more in the upbringing of daughters than sons because girls as future gatekeepers of their families' health are socialized to be attentive to health matters (Giskes et al., 2008; Reczek and Umberson, 2012). Moreover, childhood SES may be overall more important for women than men in this traditional cohort in which women were expected to focus on familial obligations and had limited opportunities for status attainment (Carr, 2004).

5.1. Mechanisms Underlying the Relationship between Early-life SES and Later-Life BMI

5.1.1. The Critical Period Model

Consistent with the critical period model, the enduring effect of early-life SES on later-life body weight persists among men and especially among women net of all mediating variables. Providing even stronger support for the critical period model, the effect of early-life SES on women's late-life BMI is greater than the effect of women's SES in midlife. It is possible that the direct effect of early-life SES observed in our study creates an illusion of the critical period processes because we cannot capture all aspects of early-life and adult social environment through which parents' SES can operate indirectly. Yet, given that we included many powerful mediators, biological imprinting reflecting the direct material effects of early-life exposures on the body should be considered a plausible mechanism. Early conditions can permanently alter metabolic processes in utero, infancy and childhood (Khlat et al., 2009). Moreover, maternal obesity is directly associated with an increased risk of obesity in offspring due to a fetal programming mechanism (Power and Schulkin, 2008), and low-SES mothers are more likely to be obese than higher-SES women (Langenberg et al., 2003; Wang and Beydoun, 2007). It is also possible that girls are more sensitive than boys to obesogenic environment because of biological sex differences in fat storage and fat metabolism related to estrogen (Power and Schulkin, 2008). The stress of early-life disadvantage can increase the risk of obesity directly via dysregulation of the neuroendocrine axis resulting in elevated cortisol (Pasquali, 2012). Chronically elevated cortisol is in turn associated with metabolic irregularities promoting excess weight over the life course (Bjorntorp and Rosmond, 2000), particularly among women (Pasquali, 2012). Because women are metabolically more inclined than men to store fat, environments conducive to weight accumulation (including low SES) are more detrimental to women than men (Power and Schulkin, 2008). In addition, the stress of socioeconomic disadvantage can affect women's body mass indirectly via food intake because women tend to increase food consumption more than men as a mechanism for coping with chronic stressors (Pasquali, 2012).

5.1.2. The Accumulation of Risks Model

Our results support the accumulation of risks model with respect to the additive effects of SES in adolescence and midlife among both men and women. This finding emphasizes the importance of joint effects of socioeconomic resources at different periods of the life course on body weight (Gustafsson and Hammarström, 2012; Murray et al., 2011). Because the lingering effects of earlier socioeconomic position tend to operate in concert with current resources, continuity in low SES over several life-course periods is likely to entail the greatest health burden. Further, consistent with the CA mechanism, we find that the adverse effects of childhood SES and adolescent adiposity among women increase with age such that women with high and low childhood SES become more divergent with respect to body weight during the transition from midlife to old age. In contrast, early-life SES and adolescent body mass are unrelated to BMI change in men. Thus, our findings indicate that early-life SES is a stronger predictor of widening disparities in body weight with advancing age among women, which suggests that unfavorable body weight trajectories originating early in life may be less amenable to modification in adulthood among women than men.

5.1.3. The Pathway Model

Consistent with the pathway model, we find that early socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage initiate divergent socioeconomic and behavioral life-course sequences affecting body weight in later life. A large proportion of the effect of early-life SES is indirect and conveyed by men's and women's socioeconomic resources and healthy or unhealthy behaviors in adolescence, midlife, and early old age.

Socioeconomic pathway

SES in midlife and later life is a significantly stronger mediator of the effect of parents' SES on sons' than daughters' BMI because own SES is related stronger to men's body weight compared to women. SES in adulthood is more consequential for men's than women's body weight because preferences for body size and adherence to weight management are more polarized by SES among men than women. The symbolic meaning of body size in our culture varies across social groups. A larger body size may be desirable as a symbol of strength and masculinity among low-SES men for whom physical effort and stamina are often a part of daily work routine (Khlat et al., 2009). In contrast, given that a trim body is a salient symbol of higher social status, high-SES men may be willing to employ multiple resources associated with social advantage to maintain lean bodies (Phelan et al. 2010). Among women, the effect of adult SES on body weight is weaker than among men because physical attractiveness standards are more closely tied to thinness and more strictly enforced for women than men (Tovée and Cornelissen, 1999). Thus, women express a preference for thinness across the SES spectrum (Schieman et al., 2006).

Early health behaviors pathway

Early socioeconomic disadvantage increases body weight over the life course such that higher body mass in adolescence leads to higher BMI in midlife which in turn increases BMI in old age. This chain of risk is more significant among women than men. Not only is the effect of early-life SES on RBM stronger for women but also continuity of body weight is more characteristic of women than men. A possible explanation is a sex difference in fat metabolism because women are more efficient than men at energy conservation and its storage as fat (Wu and O'Sullivan, 2011). Another mechanism may be related to women's higher levels of the hormone leptin, which is produced by adipose tissue and helps fat mass to remain relatively constant during adulthood (Wu and O'Sullivan, 2011).

In contrast to early-life adiposity, sports participation in high school does not mediate the effect of early-life SES because greater involvement in high school sports is related to higher BMI in later life among men. One potential pathway linking men's exercise in adolescence to greater body weight in adulthood can be high energy intake, which is the greatest for more physically active men (Platz et al., 2003). In turn, higher energy intake is associated with higher circulating insulin and insulin-like growth factor IGF-1 levels (Fontana et al., 2006), which is positively related to BMI (DeLellis et al., 2004).

It is important to note gender differences in high school sports participation. Our measure is based on the number of varsity, intramural, and club sports. Women in our study were the most likely to participate in intramural sports and the least likely to participate in varsity sports. Women outnumbered men in intramural sports but were barely represented in varsity sports. Although our measure of PA does not capture informal activity outside school, research among current cohorts of adolescents shows that girls are less likely to exercise on weekends than boys, and this difference is particularly pronounced in low-SES communities (Wardle et al., 2012). This finding underscores the importance of school sports; thus, our measure is likely to capture an important dimension of exercise in adolescence, especially among women.

Adult health behaviors pathway

Of all health behaviors, our findings emphasize the importance of PA, especially, vigorous exercise for conveying the effect of parents' SES on late-life BMI. Vigorous PA in 1993 and 2004 is a stronger mediator than light PA among both men and women. This finding points to the potential importance of interventions aimed at increasing the level of vigorous exercise. Such interventions may the most beneficial for women who are less likely to engage in vigorous PA than men (Hagströmer et al., 2007; Hardy et al., 2008). Interestingly, light PA is a more important mediator among women than men. Women engage less frequently than men in leisure-time exercise (Ham and Ainsworth, 2010) but are more likely to perform housework regularly, which contributes to women's consistent involvement in light PA. Moreover, our findings reveal the enduring benefits of vigorous exercise in midlife for weight reduction in later life. Because health behaviors unfold over the life course, health habits at earlier stages have long-term implications for later health outcomes (Umberson et al., 2010).

In contrast to PA, smoking suppresses the effect of parents' SES on offspring's body weight. Smokers have lower BMI than non-smokers but individuals from higher-SES family background are less likely to smoke in adulthood than their low-SES peers. Thus, when smoking is added to the model, the difference in BMI between persons with high- and low-SES parents becomes more pronounced. Finally, moderate drinking in 2004 mediates 10% of the effect of early-life SES on men's weight and 4% on women's weight. Our findings are consistent with studies showing that moderate drinking is related to lower weight compared to abstaining and heavy drinking. In turn, men and women from higher-SES families of origin are more likely to drink moderately than their low-SES peers. Interestingly, alcohol use in 2004 is a stronger mediator of the effect of early-life SES among men than women because parents' SES has a stronger effect on sons' than daughters' alcohol use. In other words, the gap in the likelihood of moderate drinking is greater between high- and low-SES men than between high- and low-SES women. Moreover, men from low-SES families are more prone to heavy drinking than their female counterparts.

5.2. Limitations and Future Research

The WLS sample comprises only White participants who completed at least a high school education, which makes it representative of two-thirds of this generation of Americans. Although there is sufficient variability in early-life SES because participants come from widely diverse socioeconomic family backgrounds, a potential limitation of this study is the absence of individuals who did not graduate from high school. Given that persons who are the most disadvantaged with respect to their own SES are not included, our findings are likely to underestimate socioeconomic disparities in body weight. Further, we could not explore race and ethnic differences in the effect of early-life SES on adult BMI. This direction is important for future research because minority groups have both lower SES (Williams and Collins, 1995) and higher risk of overweight and obesity (Wang and Beydoun, 2007) compared to White individuals. Moreover, this study is based on one cohort born in 1939. Because the prevalence of obesity is higher in younger than older cohorts (Keyes et al., 2010), future studies should compare the life-course effects of SES on body weight in older and younger generations.

Because the WLS initially was not designed to study health and health behaviors, the measure of adolescent body mass was obtained decades later by coding facial adiposity in high school yearbook pictures taken in 1957. The validity and reliability of this measure is documented in previous research showing, in particular, that it is an excellent predictor of BMI in midlife and late life (Reither et al., 2009). Yet, given that facial characteristics may not always accurately reflect overall body mass, it would be ideal to have measures of participants' height and weight obtained in high school. Thus, the WLS has only limited information about health behaviors in adolescence (body mass and PA from high school yearbooks) and no measures of healthy lifestyle in childhood and young adulthood. For example, it would be advantageous to have such important information as patterns of alcohol use and smoking in adolescence and young adulthood. A detailed assessment of health behaviors is available in the WLS starting only in midlife. Future studies of SES and body weight should include information about health behaviors affecting obesity collected prospectively over the life course. Further, given a positive association of maternal and paternal body weight with their children's obesity (Martin, 2008), the lack of data on parents' BMI in 1957 is a potential limitation of our study.

6. Conclusion

This study elucidates the importance of long-term consequences of early-life SES as a fundamental cause operating across the life course. We expand existing research by incorporating an array of prospective measures of early-life SES, assessing the dynamics of SES, health behaviors and BMI across the life course, and estimating the direct and indirect effects of SES in adolescence on BMI in later life through multiple mediating pathways. Our findings emphasize the complexity of life-course mechanisms underlying the effect of SES in adolescence on late-life body weight. This study expands the current understanding of complex mechanisms generating divergent trajectories of body weight among different socioeconomic groups. This understanding can potentially improve effectiveness of policies and clinical approaches aimed at reducing social inequality in body weight among older adults.

Research Highlights.

  • SES in adolescence is related negatively to body weight in midlife and later life.

  • Early socioeconomic disadvantage has a stronger effect on women's than men's weight.

  • Life-course health behaviors and SES partly mediate the effect of early-life SES.

  • The direct effect of socioeconomic background persists net of all mediators.

  • Policies addressing obesity in mid- and late life should adopt a life course approach.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

Tetyana Pudrovska, Email: tup3@psu.edu, Department of Sociology and Criminology, Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, 514 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802, USA, Phone: +1 814-867-4336.

Ellis Scott Logan, Email: esl162@psu.edu, Department of Sociology and Criminology, Pennsylvania State University, 412 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Aliza Richman, Email: adr156@psu.edu, Department of Sociology and Criminology, Pennsylvania State University, 318 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

References

  1. Baltrus PT, Lynch JW, Everson-Rose S, Raghunathan TE, Kaplan GA. Race/ethnicity, life-course socioeconomic position, and body weight trajectories over 34 years: the Alameda County Study. American Journal of Public Health. 2005;95(9):1595–1601. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.046292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben-Shlomo Y, Kuh D. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2002;31:285–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bensimhon DR, Kraus WE, Donahue MP. Obesity and physical activity: a review. American Heart Journal. 2006;151(3):598–603. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beydoun MA, Kuczmarski MT, Mason MA, Ling SM, Evans MK, Zonderman AB. Role of depressive symptoms in explaining socioeconomic status disparities in dietary quality and central adiposity among US adults: a structural equation modeling approach. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2009;90(4):1084–1095. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Björntorp P, Rosmond R. Obesity and cortisol. Nutrition. 2000;16(10):924–936. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(00)00422-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blane D, Hart CL, Smith GD, Gillis CR, Hole DJ, Hawthorne VM. Association of cardiovascular disease risk factors with socioeconomic position during childhood and during adulthood. British Medical Journal. 1996;313(7070):1434–1438. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7070.1434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brunner E, Shipley MJ, Blane D, Smith GD, Marmot MG. When does cardiovascular risk start? Past and present socioeconomic circumstances and risk factors in adulthood. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1999;53(12):757–764. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.12.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carr D. “My daughter has a career; I just raised babies”: The psychological consequences of women's intergenerational social comparisons. Social Psychology Quarterly. 2004;67(2):132–154. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cerdá M, Johnson-Lawrence VD, Galea S. Lifetime income patterns and alcohol consumption: Investigating the association between long- and short-term income trajectories and drinking. Social Science & Medicine. 2011;73(8):1178–1185. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chandola T, Deary IJ, Blane D, Batty GD. Childhood IQ in relation to obesity and weight gain in adult life: the National Child Development (1958) Study. International Journal of Obesity. 2006;30(9):1422–1432. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang VW, Hillier AE, Mehta NK. Neighborhood Racial Isolation, Disorder and Obesity. Social Forces. 2009;87(4):2063–2092. doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Clarke P, O'Malley PM, Johnston LD, Schulenberg JE. Social disparities in BMI trajectories cross adulthood by gender, race/ethnicity and lifetime socio-economic position: 1986–2004. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2009;38(2):499–509. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. DeLellis K, Rinaldi S, Kaaks RJ, Kolonel LN, Henderson B, Le Marchand L. Dietary and lifestyle correlates of plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3): the multiethnic cohort. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2004;13(9):1444–1451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Denney JT, Rogers RG, Hummer RA, Pampel FC. Education inequality in mortality: The age and gender specific mediating effects of cigarette smoking. Social Science Research. 2010;39(4):662–673. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dietz WH. Health consequences of obesity in youth: childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics. 1998;101:518–525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. DiPrete TA, Eirich GM. Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments. Annual Review of Sociology. 2006;32:271–297. [Google Scholar]
  17. Drewnowski A. Obesity, diets, and social inequalities. Nutrition Reviews. 2009;67:S36–S39. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00157.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fontana L, Klein S, Holloszy JO. Long-term low-protein, low-calorie diet and endurance exercise modulate metabolic factors associated with cancer risk. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2006;84(6):1456–1462. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.6.1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fortier MD, Katzmarzyk PT, Bouchard C. Physical activity, aerobic fitness, and \ seven-year changes in adiposity in the Canadian population. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology. 2002;27(5):449–462. doi: 10.1139/h02-024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Pou KM, Maurovich-Horvat P, Liu CY, Vasan RS, Murabito JM, Meigs JB, Cupples LA, D'Agostino RB, O'Donnell CJ. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2007;116(1):39–48. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Glass CM, Haas SA, Reither EN. The skinny on success: Body mass, gender and occupational standing across the life course. Social Forces. 2010;88(4):1777–1806. doi: 10.1353/sof.2010.0012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Giskes K, van Lenthe FJ, Turrell G, Kamphuis CB, Brug J, Mackenbach JP. Socioeconomic position at different stages of the life course and its influence on body weight and weight gain in adulthood: a longitudinal study with 13-year follow-up. Obesity. 2008;16(6):1377–1381. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldberg JH, King AC. Physical activity and weight management across the lifespan. Annual Review of Public Health. 2007;28(1):145–170. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson MC, Page P, Popkin BM. Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics. 2006;117:417–424. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gustafsson PE, Hammarström A. Socioeconomic disadvantage in adolescent women and metabolic syndrome in mid-adulthood: an examination of pathways of embodiment in the Northern Swedish Cohort. Social Science and Medicine. 2012;74(10):1630–1638. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hagströmer M, Oja P, Sjöström M. Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2007;39:1502–1508. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180a76de5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ham SA, Ainsworth BE. Disparities in data on Healthy People 2010 physical activity objectives collected by accelerometry and self-report. American Journal of Public Health. 2010;100(S1):S263–S268. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.180075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hardy SE, Allore HG, Guo Z, Gill TM. Explaining the effect of gender on functional transitions in older persons. Gerontology. 2008;54:79–86. doi: 10.1159/000115004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Heraclides A, Brunner E. Social mobility and social accumulation across the life course in relation to adult overweight and obesity: the Whitehall II study. Journal Epidemiology and Community Health. 2010;64(8):714–719. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.087692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jakicic JM, Winters C, Lang W, Wing RR. Effects of intermittent exercise and use of home exercise equipment on adherence, weight loss, and fitness in overweight women: a randomized trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;282(16):1554–1560. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.16.1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. James SA, Fowler-Brown A, Raghunathan TE, Van Hoewyk J. Life-course socioeconomic position and obesity in African American Women: the Pitt County Study. American Journal of Public Health. 2006;96(3):554–560. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.053447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Johnston LD, Delva J, O'Malley PM. Sports participation and physical education in American secondary schools: current levels and racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2007;33(4):S195–S208. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Judge T, Cable D. When it comes to pay, do the thin win? The effect of weight on pay for men and women. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2011;96(1):95–112. doi: 10.1037/a0020860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kasteridis P, Yen ST. Smoking cessation and body weight: evidence from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey. Health Services Research. 2012;47(4):1580–1602. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01380.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Keyes KM, Utz RL, Robinson W, Li G. What is a cohort effect? Comparison of three statistical methods for modeling cohort effects in obesity prevalence in the United States, 1971-2006. Social Science and Medicine. 2010;70(7):1100–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Khlat M, Jusot F, Ville I. Social origins, early hardship and obesity: a strong association in women, but not in men? Social Science and Medicine. 2009;68(9):1692–1699. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Klesges RC, Mealer CZ, Klesges LM. Effects of alcohol intake on resting energy expenditure in young women social drinkers. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1994;59(4):805–809. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/59.4.805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kuh DJ, Cooper C. Physical activity at 36 years: patterns and childhood predictors in a longitudinal study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1992;46(2):114–119. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.2.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Langenberg C, Hardy R, Kuh D, Brunner E, Wadsworth M. Central and total obesity in middle aged men and women in relation to lifetime socioeconomic status. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2003;57:816–822. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.10.816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lantz PM, Golberstein E, House JS, Morenoff J. Social and behavioral risk factors for mortality in a national 19-year prospective study of U.S. adults. Social Science & Medicine. 2010;70:1558–1566. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Macinnis RJ, Hodge AM, Dixon HG, Peeters A, Johnson LE, English DR, Giles GG. Predictors of increased body weight and waist circumference for middle-aged adults. Public Health Nutrition. 2013:1–11. doi: 10.1017/S1368980013001031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Martin MA. The intergenerational correlation in weight: how genetic resemblance reveals the social role of families. American Journal of Sociology. 2008;114(Sl):S67–S105. doi: 10.1086/592203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. McLaughlin KA, Kubzansky LD, Dunn EC, Waldinger R, Vaillant G, Koenen KC. Childhood social environment, emotional reactivity to stress, and mood and anxiety disorders across the life course. Depression and Anxiety. 2010;27(12):1087–1094. doi: 10.1002/da.20762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mirowsky J. Cognitive decline and the default American lifestyle. Journal of Gerontology. 2011;66(S1):i50–i58. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbq070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Muennig P, Lubetkin E, Franks P. Gender and the burden of disease attributable to obesity. American Journal of Public Health. 2006;96(9):1662–1668. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.068874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Murphy M, Wang D. Family-level continuities in childbearing in low-fertility societies. European Journal of Population. 2001;17(1):75–96. [Google Scholar]
  47. Murray ET, Mishra GD, Kuh D, Guralnik J, Black S, Hardy R. Life course models of socioeconomic position and cardiovascular risk factors: 1946 birth cohort. Annals of Epidemiology. 2011;21(8):589–597. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Needham BL, Epel ES, Adler NE, Kiefe C. Trajectories of change in obesity and symptoms of depression: The CARDIA Study. American Journal of Public Health. 2010;100(6):1040–1046. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.172809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Parsons TJ, Power C, Logan S, Summerbell CD. Childhood predictors of adult obesity: a systematic review. International Journal of Obesity Related Metabolic Disorders. 1999;23(S8):S1–S107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pasquali R. The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and sex hormones in chronic stress and obesity: pathophysiological and clinical aspects. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2012;1264(1):20–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06569.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Pearlin LI, Schieman S, Fazio EM, Meersman SC. Stress, health, and the life course: Some conceptual perspectives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2005;46(2):205–219. doi: 10.1177/002214650504600206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Phelan JC, Link BG, Tehranifar P. Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: theory, evidence, and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2010;51(S1):S28–S40. doi: 10.1177/0022146510383498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Platz EA, Leitzmann MF, Michaud DS, Willett WC, Giovannucci E. Interrelation of energy intake, body size, and physical activity with prostate cancer in a large prospective cohort study. Cancer Research. 2003;63(23):8542–8548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Clarke A, Smith WCS. Physical activity attitudes, intentions and behaviour among 18–25 year olds: a mixed method study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):640. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Power ML, Schulkin J. Sex differences in fat storage, fat metabolism, and the health risks from obesity: possible evolutionary origins. British Journal of Nutrition. 2008;99(5):931–940. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507853347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Reczek C, Umberson D. Gender, health behavior, and intimate relationships: lesbian, gay, and straight contexts. Social Science and Medicine. 2012;74(11):1783–1790. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Reither EN, Hauser RM, Swallen KC. Predicting adult health and mortality from adolescent facial characteristics in yearbook photographs. Demography. 2009;46(1):27–41. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Roos CJ, Quax PH, Jukema JW. Cardiovascular metabolic syndrome: mediators involved in the pathophysiology from obesity to coronary heart disease. Biomarkers in Medicine. 2012;6(1):35–52. doi: 10.2217/bmm.11.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Age and the gender gap in the sense of personal control. Social Psychology Quarterly. 2002;65(2):125–145. [Google Scholar]
  60. Rossen LM, Schoendorf KC. Measuring health disparities: trends in racial-ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in obesity among 2- to 18-year old youth in the United States, 2001-2010. Annals of Epidemiology. 2012;22(10):698–704. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Salonen MK, Kajantie E, Osmond C, Forsén T, Ylihärsilä H, Paile-Hyvärinen M, Barker DJ, Eriksson JG. Role of socioeconomic indicators on development of obesity from a life course perspective. Journal of Environmental and Public Health. 2009;2009:625168. doi: 10.1155/2009/625168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sammel MD, Grisso JA, Freeman EW, Hollander L, Liu L, Liu S, Nelson DB, Battistini M. Weight gain among women in the late reproductive years. Family Practice. 2003;20(4):401–409. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmg411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Schieman S, Pudrovska T, Eccles R. Perceptions of body weight among older adults: analyses of the intersection of gender, race, and socioeconomic status. Journal of Gerontology. 2007;62(6):S415–S423. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.6.s415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sewell WH, Hauser RM. Education, Occupation, and Earnings: Achievement in the Early Career. Academic Press; New York: 1975. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sherwood NE, Jeffery RW. The behavioral determinants of exercise: implications for physical activity interventions. Annual Review of Nutrition. 2000;20:21–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.20.1.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sobal J, Stunkard AJ. Socioeconomic status and obesity: A review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin. 1989;105(2):260–275. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Tanaka S, Togashi K, Rankinen T, Pérusse L, Leon AS, Rao DC, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Després JP, Bouchard C. Sex differences in the relationships of abdominal fat to cardiovascular disease risk among normal-weight white subjects. International Journal of Obesity. 2003;28(2):320–323. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Torr BM. The changing relationship between education and marriage in the United States, 1940–2000. Journal of Family History. 2011;36(4):483–503. doi: 10.1177/0363199011416760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Tovée MJ, Cornelissen PL. The mystery of female beauty. Nature. 1999;399(6733):215–216. doi: 10.1038/20345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Umberson D, Liu H, Powers D. Marital status, marital transitions, and body weight. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2009;50(3):327–343. doi: 10.1177/002214650905000306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Umberson D, Crosnoe R, Reczek C. Social Relationships and Health Behavior Across Life Course. Annual Review of Sociology. 2010;36:139–157. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Umberson D, Liu H, Mirowsky J, Reczek C. Parenthood and trajectories of change in body weight over the life course. Social Science and Medicine. 2011;73(9):1323–1331. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wang Y, Beydoun MA. The obesity epidemic in the United States–gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiological Reviews. 2007;29(1):6–28. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxm007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Wannamethee SG, Field AE, Colditz GA, Rim EB. Alcohol intake and 8-year weight gain in women: a prospective study. Obesity Research. 2004;12(9):1386–1396. doi: 10.1038/oby.2004.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wardle J, Jarvis MJ, Steggles N, Sutton S, Williamson S, Farrimond H, Cartwright M, Simon AE. Socioeconomic disparities in cancer-risk behaviors in adolescence: baseline results from the Health and Behaviour in Teenagers Study (HABITS) Preventive Medicine. 2003;36(6):721–730. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00047-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Westerterp KR. Diet induced thermogenesis. Nutrition & Metabolism. 2004;1:5. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-1-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Williams DR, Collins C. U.S. socioeconomic and racial differences in health: Patterns and explanations. Annual Review of Sociology. 1995;21:349–386. [Google Scholar]
  78. Wu BN, O'Sullivan AJ. Sex differences in energy metabolism need to be considered with lifestyle modifications in humans. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2011;2011:391809. doi: 10.1155/2011/391809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Zheng H, Yang Y. Population heterogeneity in the impact of body weight on mortality. Social Science and Medicine. 2012;75(6):990–996. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES