Abstract
Modulation of immune response is important in cancer immunotherapy, vaccine adjuvant development and inflammatory or immune disease therapy. Here we report the development of new immunomodulators via control of shape transition among RNA triangle, square and pentagon. Changing one RNA strand in polygons automatically induced the stretching of the interior angle from 60° to 90° or 108°, resulting in self-assembly of elegant RNA triangles, squares and pentagons. When immunological adjuvants were incorporated, their immunomodulation effect for cytokine TNF-α and IL-6 induction was greatly enhanced in vitro and in animals up to 100-fold, while RNA polygon controls induced unnoticeable effect. The RNA nanoparticles were delivered to macrophages specifically. The degree of immunostimulation greatly depended on the size, shape and number of the payload per nanoparticles. Stronger immune response was observed when the number of adjuvants per polygon was increased, demonstrating the advantage of shape transition from triangle to pentagon.
INTRODUCTION
One area of biomimetic nanotechnology involves the construction of nano-scale, supramolecular architectures utilizing modular units of functional nucleic acids. The aim is to design nanostructures that undergo self-assembly in a controllable fashion. Ribonucleic acid (RNA) was discovered as an attractive material to build nanoparticles via nanotechnology (1), offering a variety of structural modules and motifs that can be manipulated into 1D, 2D and 3D architectures (for review see (2)). In the past decade, a variety of geometric RNA nanoparticles and nano-scaffolds have been obtained via the approaches of hand-in-hand (1,3–5), foot-to-foot (6–9), branch extension (10–14), loop–receptor contact (15–17), ‘sticky’ or ‘dangling’ ends (6,18,19) and synthetic RNA–protein complex interactions (20). These motifs are available in databases and can be used to build artificial nanostructures by manipulating their interchangeable units (21). Recently, RNA rolling cycle transcription has been utilized to generate RNA sponges (22,23). In RNA tectonics approach, structural motifs like double helices, loops and junctions can be isolated from large and complex RNA molecules appearing in structural databases and used to build artificial nanostructures by manipulating their interchangeable units (24,25). As such, previously reported designs of RNA nanoparticles, e.g. tecto-square (26), square-shaped nano-scaffolds (27,28), RNA nano-rings (1,5,7,9) or pRNA dimmers, tetramers and hexamers (1,7,9,29,30), as well as RNA nano-cubes (19), RNA polyhedron (14), RNA bundles (6,31) and filaments (15,16) utilize fundamental principles of RNA structure and folding (32–36). Overall stability of conventional constructs though, mainly relies on the stability of canonical and non-canonical base pair (bp) forming by loop–loop, receptor–loop, or ‘sticky-ends’ with a number of pairing nucleotides usually not exceeding six. A new approach is needed to increase overall stability of RNA nanoparticles, one that uses naturally-selected stable RNA building blocks for structure building, and the example is the 3WJ motif from pRNA of bacteriophage phi29 DNA packaging motor. In addition to discovering that the pRNA-3WJ shows exceptional stability under physiological conditions and in the presence of strong denaturing agent (10,11), recent studies also suggest that the thermodynamic stability of the 3WJ is entropy driven (37).
In this report, we introduce a conceptual approach to the rational design of stable RNA architectures by stretching the 60° AOB angle (∠) (Figure 1) of the thermodynamically stable pRNA 3WJ motif. We demonstrate that it can be stretched to wide conformations resulting in different 2D polygons: triangle (∠AOB = 60°) (18), square (∠AOB = 90°) and pentagon (∠AOB = 108°). Intermolecular interactions such as kissing loops, receptor loop, or ‘sticky-ends’ were avoided by introducing linkages through base pairing between corners of the polygons using RNA double helices. Therefore, this system is advantageous with an increased thermo-stability in the overall construct.
Figure 1.

Structural features of the pRNA 3WJ motif. (A) Secondary structure of 3WJ motif with base pairs annotated using Leontis–Westhof nomenclature (25). (B) Tertiary structure of 3WJ motif with indication of ∠AOB ∼ 60° angle formed between H1 and H2. Angle corresponds to inner angles of polygons.
We further demonstrate that the RNA polygons have the potential to serve as a new generation of delivery systems for immunomodulators. Synthetic unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN) are immunostimulatory DNA molecules that mimic the immunostimulatory activity of bacterial DNA (38,39). CpG DNA motifs strongly activate the mammalian innate immune system by interacting with various immune cells via endosomal Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) (40,41). Upon the stimulation by CpG DNA, immune cells could secret a variety of proinflammatory and antiviral cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-12 and interferon (IFN), which leads to potent immune response. The therapeutic potential of CpG DNA has also been extensively explored in both basic research and human clinical trials, including the development of new vaccine adjuvants, anticancer agents, immunoprotective agents and anti-allergic agents (42–45). Recently, several groups have reported the utilization of DNA nanostructures such as DNA tetrahedrons (46), DNA polypod-like structures (47), DNA origami structures (48), Y-shaped DNA (49) and DNA dendrimers (50) to deliver immunostimulatory CpG DNA. In this work, to the best of our knowledge, we report the first use of RNA nanostructures to deliver CpG DNA in vitro and in vivo. The immunostimulatory efficacy of RNA polygons was evaluated by measuring the release of cytokines. We found that the induction of cytokines is highly dependent on the number of CpG per polygon. With increasing number of CpG per polygon, stronger immune response was observed, demonstrating the advantage of the transition from a triangle to a pentagon that can carry five CpGs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RNA nanoparticles design, synthesis and self-assembly
The 3WJ crystal structure of the pRNA molecule (PDB ID: 4KZ2) was primarily used for designing polygon models using Swiss PDB viewer, as previously described (18). RNA strands for corresponding triangle, square and pentagon, were synthesized by in vitro T7 transcription using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) generated DNA templates. RNAs were purified by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and were either Cy5 whole body RNA labeled (Mirus Bio LLC) or 5′-end [γ-32P] ATP (PerkinElmer) labeled, as previously described (8).
RNA polygons were assembled in one pot by mixing equimolar concentrations (1 μM) of four RNA strands for the triangle, five RNA strands for the square and six RNA strands for the pentagon in 1× TMS buffer (50 mM TRIS pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl and 10 mM MgCl2). Samples were annealed for 1 h in a thermocycler with controlled, slow cooling (1°C/min) from 80 to 4°C. All RNA polygons harboring CpG ODNs were assembled from their corresponding 2′F-U/C modified strands in one pot procedure.
Native PAGE, temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) and boiling resistance assays
RNA assemblies were evaluated on 7% (29:1) native polyacrylamide gels in the presence of 0.5 × TMS buffer. Gels were run at constant 90 V, +4 °C. Gels were imaged with Typhoon FLA 7000 (GE Healthcare) to visualize RNA strands. TGGE analysis was performed on 7% native PAGE in a buffer containing 50 mM TRIS pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl and 0.2 mM MgCl2, as previously described (14,26,28). A gradient temperature of 30–70 °C was applied perpendicular to electrical current and the experiment was run for 1 h at 20 W. A total RNA concentration of 100 nM was used in TGGE analysis. Apparent TM values corresponded to the temperature at which half of the polygons fractions were dissociated and apparent KD values for multiple RNA strands were calculated, as described previously (7).
Boiling resistance assay was performed in 10 μl containing 1 μM preassembled polygons in TMS buffer or in the presence of 8 M urea. Samples were incubated at 100 °C for several minutes, then snap cooled on dry ice to prevent refolding following evaluation on 7% native PAGE at 4 °C. Individual experiments were repeated several times to reduce error.
Quantification analysis was performed using ImageJ (52). Equal-sized boxes were drawn around the lanes corresponding to the triangle, square, or pentagon complexes and corresponding quantified values for each type of polygon were divided by the sum of the values presented in the corresponding lane.
Cell cultures
Mouse macrophage-like RAW 264.7 cells were grown in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin at 37°C in humidified air containing 5% CO2. Cells were then seeded on 24-well plates or 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells/ml and cultured overnight before use.
Cytokine secretion from RAW264.7 Cells
RAW 264.7 cells were plated into 24-well plates with the density of 2.5 × 105 cells per well and cultured overnight. Then, RNA nanoparticles harboring different numbers of CpG ODNs were diluted in Opti-MEM medium (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and added to the cells. The cells were continually cultured for 8 h at 37 °C in humidified air containing 5% CO2, and the cell culture supernatant were collected and stored at −80 °C until use. The concentration of TNF-α and IL-6 in the supernatant were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using Mouse ELISA MAX™ Deluxe sets (BioLegend, Inc., San Diego, CA), following protocols provided by the manufacturer.
Cytokine secretion from mice
Male CD-1 mice (4–5 weeks old) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at University of Kentucky and were performed in accordance with guidelines issued by the National Institutes of Health for the care of laboratory animals. For in vivo immunostimulation, RNA triangular nanoparticles harboring CpG ODN, RNA triangular nanoparticles, or CpG ODN were dissolved in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and administrated to the mice via tail vein injection at 2 mg/kg (CpG ODN per body weight). The same volume of PBS was injected into a mouse as a control. Blood samples were collected 3 h post-injection by cardiac puncture. Serum was prepared by centrifugation at 12 800 g for 10 min. Serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using Mouse ELISA MAX™ Deluxe sets (BioLegend, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), following protocols provided by the manufacturer.
Confocal microscopy imaging
RAW 264.7 cells were seeded on glass coverslips in 24-well plates and cultured at 37 °C in humidified air containing 5% CO2 overnight. The culture medium was removed and the cells were washed with Opti-MEM medium twice to remove dead cells. RNA nanoparticles harboring Cy3-labeled CpG DNA or Cy3-labled CpG DNA only were diluted in Opti-MEM medium and added to the cells. After 4 h incubation at 37 °C in humidified air containing 5% CO2, the cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% formaldehyde. ProLong® Gold Antifade Reagent with DAPI (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA) was used to stain the cell nucleus and mount the samples. Alexa Fluor® 488 phalloidin (Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to stain actin. The images were obtained on a Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
RESULTS
RNA polygons: triangle, square and pentagon fabrication and self-assembly
The structural features of the recently discovered ultrastable pRNA 3WJ module from the bacteriophage Phi29 DNA packaging motor were utilized for in silico design of the RNA triangle, square and pentagon 2D polygons. During the computer modeling we used the particular angle of the 3WJ formed by H1 and H2 as an inner angle of the polygons as we hypothesized that the angle could be stretched to a more open conformation. Throughout this report the intra-helical angle between H1 and H2 is denoted as ∠AOB, as shown in figure 1. Each RNA model contained a pRNA 3WJ motif at each vertex, and the inner angles correspond to ∠AOB. The resulting 3D models exhibited flat conformations, as expected from the plane geometry of the 3WJ motif (51) (Figure 2A).
Figure 2.

Design of Polygons and assembly properties. (A) 3D modeled structures of polygons with 3WJ motif located at vertices, inner angle corresponds to ∠AOB. (B) The increasing length of the internal strand (green) stretches the 3WJ ∠AOB at which the nanoparticles assemble, along with increasing number of external ‘short’ strands. (C) Assembly properties of polygons evaluated on 7% native PAGEs. Asterisks ‘*’ indicate the Cy5 labeled strands utilized on each type of polygon assembly.
Each polygon was composed of a different number of RNA strands classified as short strands (external) and long strands (internal) (Figure 2B). By increasing the number of external strands and the propagation of the central or internal strand, the tension on the inter-helical ∠AOB increased to 60°, 90° and 108°, allowing for 2D formation of corresponding triangle, square and pentagon shapes. The measured widths, from one corner to another, were 10.2 nm, while the heights differed as follows: triangle = 9.1 nm, square = 10.2 nm and pentagon = 12.7 nm. Following the transcription of individual RNA strands, self-assembly properties of the triangle, square and pentagon designs were evaluated on 7% native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) (Figure 2C). All polygon formations were obtained by one-step self-assembly (7,10,11,19). Each RNA component of corresponding nanoparticles were whole chain labeled with Cy5 to evaluate participation of all RNA strands in their corresponding assemblies. Yield of correctly assembled polygons was estimated to be >90% based on native PAGE gel evaluations. Equilibrium constants of dissociation were obtained from apparent KD gels, and KD values were determined to be 18.8, 20.3 and 22.5 nM for triangles, squares and pentagons, respectively (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2).
These results demonstrate that each RNA nanoparticle assembles into the desired nanostructure, and indicated by a stretching of the 60°∠AOB to wider conformations. The assembly of RNA strands into specific-shaped nanoparticles based on the 60°∠AOB of the pRNA 3WJ motif was controlled by modulating the number of short external stands and the length of the long internal strand.
Structural characterization of polygons by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS)
To further evaluate the size and shape of the resulting RNA assemblies, structural characterization of each polygon was conducted by AFM. AFM images of the pRNA 3WJ based polygons revealed that the shapes of resulting polygons were similar to their predicted, theoretical 3D models (Figure 3A). The estimated average dimensions were found to be 13 ± 1.1, 14 ± 1.8 and 17 ± 1.6 nm for triangles, squares and pentagons, respectively. These values do not reflect the true sizes of the RNA polygons due to the AFM tip convolution, but rather demonstrate that the average size of the nanoparticles increases from triangle to pentagon. In addition, the central cavity of each RNA shape is visible, and the size of the cavity gradually increases with the number of polygon vertices. The measured heights for all nanoparticles was found to be ∼2 nm, in agreement with previously reported heights of nucleic acid double helices (26,53).
Figure 3.

Structural characterization of polygons. (A) AFM images of triangular, square and pentagonal nanoparticles derived from the pRNA 3WJ motif. (B) Polygons size distribution histogram obtained via dynamic light scattering.
Quantification analysis was performed to compare apparent yields between polygons observed on AFM mica surface. Equal concentrations (1 nM) of the polygons were deposited on a mica surface and correctly folded polygons were manually counted in a 0.5 μm2 area, resulting in 48 triangular particles, 33 square particles and 17 pentagon nanoparticles (Supplementary Figure S3). The estimated number of triangular nanoparticles adsorbed on the mica was ∼1.5 times more than that of the square and three times more than that of the pentagon. However, native PAGE revealed that the yields among the three polygons were almost equal. The difference in adsorption amounts between polygons on the mica surface was presumably due to variation in their sizes and 3D conformations, resulting in different dynamic and physical properties.
DLS was performed to determine the apparent hydrodynamic diameters for each of the polygons. The diameters were found to be 8.5, 11.1 and 13.5 nm for triangles, squares and pentagons, respectively (Figure 3B). The increase in number of 3WJ cores corresponds with the larger observed diameter. The measured diameters agreed with their corresponding 3D models. However, there was a discrepancy between polygon sizes determined by AFM and DLS. This could be attributed to the fundamentally different techniques, as DLS determines the average size distribution profile of nanoparticles in solution assuming that the polygons have globular shapes [refer to manual at http://www.malvern.com], while AFM imaging can produce images larger than the real diameter due to tip size used (54) and the resolution of imaging equipment. Nevertheless, the two techniques demonstrated that the relative size of the nanoparticles increased from triangle to square to pentagon.
Accordingly, native PAGE, AFM and DLS showed the formation of compact molecular 2D assemblies of triangle, square and pentagon based on the pRNA 3WJ ∠AOB. Consequently, the naturally preserved 60° ∠AOB could be stretched to reach the formation of square and pentagon. The stretching, or tension, that the angle underwent could have had a significant impact on the overall stability of the nanoparticles. Therefore, it was of great interest to evaluate and compare the polygon's stabilities.
Stability comparison between triangle, square and pentagon
The stabilities of polygons were studied using a perpendicular TGGE (Biometra GmbH). This convenient technique has garnered widespread use for measuring melting temperatures of RNA nanoparticles with multiple strands (5,7,14,26,28,55). The preassembled polygons were subjected to 7% native TGGE with a gradient temperature of 30–70°C perpendicular to electrical current. The following apparent TM values were obtained for the polygons at 100 nM total concentration (Ct) in presence of 0.2 mM MgCl2: triangle TM = 56°C, square TM = 53°C and pentagon TM = 50°C (Figure 4A). The triangular nanoscaffolds were more stable than squares and pentagons, although the number of RNA bp was much higher in the pentagon construct, as compared to the square and triangle. Usually, the stability of nucleic acids with the same base-pair content is directly dependent on metal ion and total nucleic acid concentrations. Since these two criteria were the same, it was assumed that the higher the number of bp in a given RNA structure the higher the stability. Therefore, the most stable shape produced should be the pentagon. However, based on TGGE data the opposite was found. This was likely due to the tension caused by the stretching of the native pRNA 3WJ 60° ∠AOB. The triangular construct angle was preserved (60°), the square and pentagon angles were stretched to the wider conformations of 90° and 108°, respectively. Previously it has been shown that any nucleotide mutations or deletions within the native core structure of the pRNA 3WJ motif would also result in the loss of its thermodynamic stability (10). Interestingly, the measured triangle and square TM values differed by +3°C, as did the square and pentagon. Boiling resistance assay in the presence and absence of 8 M urea further confirmed that the triangle was the most stable nanoparticle (Figure 4B). The quantification of nanoparticle bands after heating to 100°C resulted in 75 ± 4% recovery of the triangular assembly, suggesting a TM >100°C. By definition, TM is the measured temperature when half the RNA concentration has melted, i.e. 50% recovery. The percentage of recovery for square was 28 ± 2% and for pentagon was 16 ± 5%, much lower than the value estimated for triangle recovery. The experiment with the presence of 8 M urea in boiling solution showed that the overall trend of stability remained the same, but the percentage of recovery was 55 ± 4% for triangle, 8 ± 3% for square and no pentagon fraction was detected. Overall, the nanoparticle with fewer 3WJ motifs (triangle) resulted in a higher thermostability and resistance in chemical degradation and the change in stability was in large part due to the stretching of the ∠AOB.
Figure 4.
Comparison of polygon stabilities. (A) Melting temperatures of triangle, square and pentagon assessed by 7% perpendicular TGGE. (B) Boiling resistance assay in absence and presence of 8 M urea. Calculated percentage of recovery for polygons after boiling is shown below each gel with error bars calculated from several independent experiments.
The modulation effect of triangle, square and pentagon harboring immunological adjuvant
CpG oligonucleotide is an immunological adjuvant popularly used as vaccine adjuvant or immunotherapy reagent for disease control and treatment (42). To evaluate whether RNA polygons can enhance the immunomodulation effect, CpG oligonucleotide was incorporated with each RNA polygon using one-pot self-assembly (Supplementary Figures S4–S6). The toxicity assay for the resulting complexes revealed no toxicity; moreover the RNA polygon-CpG complexes induced cell proliferation during the incubation period, as compared to the cell only control (Supplementary Figure S7).
The extracellular immunostimulatory efficacy of RNA polygons was evaluated by measuring the release of cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 after addition to mouse macrophage-like RAW 264.7 cells (Figure 5A and B), as previously described (56,57). The triangular RNA nanoparticle coupled with only one CpG exhibited the highest level of cytokine induction for both TNF-α and IL-6 compared to square and pentagonal RNA nanoparticles. Increasing the number of CpG per nanoparticle yielded the opposite effect, as pentagonal RNA nanocarriers showed the highest level of the induction of both TNF-α and IL-6 presumably due to the increased local CpG concentration. The results suggest that the cytokine release by CpG coupled to RNA polygons with different shapes remarkably increases the immunostimulatory activity compared to CpG alone (Figure 5). RNA particles with the size of about 10 nm, such as the triangle, induced the greatest amount of TNF-α and IL-6. In addition, the induction of cytokines was highly dependent on the number of CpG per polygon. With increasing number of CpG per polygon, a stronger immune response is observed (Figure 5C), demonstrating an advantage of transiting from triangle to pentagon that can carry five CpG oligonucleotides.
Figure 5.

Effect of cytokine induction in macrophage-like RAW 264.7 cells and mice by RNA-CpG polygons. Induction of (A) TNF-α and (B) IL-6 cytokines by 50 nM RNA polygons-CpG. (C) Dependence of TNF-α induction with the number of CpGs per RNA polygon. The error bars represent standard deviation from at least three independent experiments. (D) Immunostimulatory activity by triangle-CpG nanoparticle in animal model. The error bars represent standard deviations of two independent measurements of the cytokine levels from serum aliquots of the tested mouse.
Enhancement of modulation effect in animal by immunological adjuvant incorporated into RNA triangle
To examine whether RNA nanoparticles retain their immunostimulatory activity in vivo, nanoparticles were administered to CD-1 mice by injection into the tail vein at 2 mg/kg (CpG oligonucleotide per body weight), following level determination of cytokine TNF-α and IL-6 levels after 3 h post-administration in collected blood serum. Figure 5D shows that free triangle nanoparticles and free CpGs did not induce any cytokine production, whereas the complex triangle-CpG resulted in elevated levels of both cytokines. The difference in immunostimulatory activity of triangle-CpG was estimated to be 10-fold compared to free CpG in vivo. These data are in agreement with the in vitro stimulation of murine RAW 264.7 cells.
Comparison of cellular uptake by different CpG-RNA polygons
Previously, it has been demonstrated that the CpG oligonucleotide can be readily recognized by TLR9 on the endosomal membrane of macrophages, resulting in cellular uptake of the CpG adjuvants (58,59). To investigate whether there is a difference between the efficiency of RNA polygons binding to the cells, we quantified the cellular uptake of polygons-CpG using flow cytometry assay (9,10). Figure 6A demonstrates the binding of different RNA polygon-CpG to the RAW264.7 cells in a dose-dependent manner. There was an increase in binding efficiency from triangle to pentagon with more CpGs (Supplementary Figure S8). Notably, all RNA polygons-CpG complexes remain intact after 16 h incubation in 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) indicating robustness of the assembled complex in extracellular environment (Supplementary Figure S9). Overall, RNA polygon-CpG complexes exhibit significantly more binding efficiency to cells compared to CpG oligonucleotides alone.
Figure 6.
Comparison of RNA polygon-CpG complexes binding to the cells. (A) The plot represents the summary of the flow cytometry data showing each RNA nanoparticle-CpG adjuvants binding to the cell in a dose-dependent manner. (B) Confocal images showing the binding comparison of the triangle-CpG and CpG to the RAW 264.7 cells by colocalization of nucleus (blue), actin or cytoplasm (green) and Cy-3-labeled CpGs (red) signals.
This observation was further confirmed by confocal microscopy images (Figure 6B) revealing that RNA nanoparticle harboring CpGs are localized in the cytoplasm exclusively and that there are much higher amounts of triangular nanoparticles inside the cell compared to free CpG, suggesting that RNA nanoparticles could efficiently enhance the cellular uptake of the CpG adjuvants.
Collectively, both flow cytometry and confocal imaging demonstrated that all RNA nanoparticles with different shape and harboring CpGs have much stronger binding and cellular entry to the macrophage-like RAW 264.7 cells compared to free CpGs. In addition, cellular uptake was highly dependent on the number of CpG per polygon. With the increasing number of CpG per polygon, more efficient cell binding and entry was observed (Figure 5C and Supplementary Figure S8), demonstrating the advantage of the transition from triangle to pentagon nanoparticles that can carry five CpG.
DISCUSSION
Artificial construction of RNA nanoparticles requires knowledge of the structural properties of RNA motifs, such as interhelical or intrahelical distances, X–Y and X–Y–Z angles, number and orientations of RNA branches in multi-way junctions, canonical and non-canonical interactions, binding sites for proteins, metal ions and small molecules (2,10,16,25,51,60). Progression in RNA structural biology allowed for the analysis of RNA 3D motifs from existing RNA structures at atomic resolution and various databases, including www.pdb.com, RNA multi-way junction (61) and Find RNA 3D motif (62). This study, based on the previously reported versatile pRNA 3WJ 3D motifs (PDB accession ID: 4KZ2) (10,51), shows that the 3WJ structure can be folded into desired conformations based on the dynamics of the 60°∠AOB, demonstrating the ability to tune the physical and structural properties of RNA polygons for a variety of technological, biological and medicinal needs. By using the 3WJ, a strategy has been reported to tune the size of a square by altering the length of each side of the polygon (63). This approach, based on the propagation of the central RNA strand used to direct the folding of corresponding short or external strands into planar triangle, square and pentagon conformations, resulted in the 60º, 90º and 108º bending of interhelical ∠AOB of the pRNA 3WJ. This is especially important for medical applications where one needs to construct different RNA nano-scaffolds based on a non-toxic and thermodynamically stable building block. The following advantages result from this technique: (i) the number and combination of therapeutic molecules can be tuned to an RNA-based nano-carrier; (ii) the nano-scaffold has a controllable size and shape and (iii) variable thermodynamic and RNase resistance properties can be applied depending on the application of the nano-scaffold.
In addition to the discovery of the unique approach for the rational design of stable RNA nanoparticles, it has been demonstrated that each RNA polygon has the potential to serve as multivalent nanocarriers for vaccine adjuvants, particularly of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. The designed RNAs self-assemble into distinct, non-toxic homogeneous nanoparticles with high chemical, thermal and intracellular stability. We found that the size and shape of the RNA nanostructures are important factors for the induction of immunostimulatory processes in vitro and in animal models and that there is a correlation between the cytokine induction and the local CpG concentration effect. The highest level of secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6 was obtained with the smallest nanoparticle (triangle ∼ 9 nm size) harboring one CpG compared to square (∼11 nm) and pentagon (∼13 nm). However, upon increasing the numbers of CpG per RNA nanoparticle the cytokine induction was affected more by pentagon as the number or local concentration of CpG is highest in the pentagon. This study illustrates the importance of the size and shape of RNA nanoparticles for improvement of activity of CpG based vaccines adjuvants targeting infectious diseases and cancer cells, as well as for increasing immune responses by the innate and adaptive immune systems. The RNA nanoparticles harboring CpGs are safe, effective, versatile and easy to manufacture, offering new solutions to address the unmet needs in current vaccines and adjuvants design and development. Recent findings on the thermodynamically ultra-stable (10,11) and heat-resistant (18) RNA nanoparticles have expanded the potential for application of pRNA 3WJ derived nanoparticles in the fields of biomedical, nanotechnology, or polymer industries.
ACCESSION NUMBER
PDB ID: 4KZ2.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.
Acknowledgments
We thank Luda Shlyakhtenko for AFM imaging at the Nanoimaging Core Facility supported by the NIH SIG program and the UNMC Program of ENRI to Yuri Lyubchenko; Markey Cancer Center for confocal microscope shared resource facility; University of Kentucky for flow cytometry and cell sorting core facility; Dr. Deneys R. van der Westhuyzen for kindly providing the RAW 264.7 cell line; Jeannie Haak for assistance in manuscript preparation.
Footnotes
Present address:
Peixuan Guo, BioPharm Building, Rm 565, 789 S. Limestone St., Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first three authors should be regarded as Joint First Authors.
FUNDING
NIH grant R01-EB003730 from National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Engineering; U01-CA 151648 from National Cancer institute; Funding of Peixuan Guo's Endowed Chair Position from the William Fairish Endowment Fund.
Conflict of interest statement. P.G. is a co-founder of Biomotor and RNA Nanotech Development Co. Ltd; and RNA Nano, LLC.
REFERENCES
- 1.Guo P., Zhang C., Chen C., Trottier M., Garver K. Inter-RNA interaction of phage phi29 pRNA to form a hexameric complex for viral DNA transportation. Mol. Cell. 1998;2:149–155. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80124-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guo P. The emerging field of RNA nanotechnology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010;5:833–842. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen C., Zhang C., Guo P. Sequence requirement for hand-in-hand interaction in formation of pRNA dimers and hexamers to gear phi29 DNA translocation motor. RNA. 1999;5:805–818. doi: 10.1017/s1355838299990350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Geary C., Chworos A., Jaeger L. Promoting RNA helical stacking via A-minor junctions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;39:1066–1080. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grabow W.W., Zakrevsky P., Afonin K.A., Chworos A., Shapiro B.A., Jaeger L. Self-assembling RNA nanorings based on RNAI/II inverse kissing complexes. Nano Lett. 2011;11:878–887. doi: 10.1021/nl104271s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shu D., Moll W.D., Deng Z., Mao C., Guo P. Bottom-up assembly of RNA arrays and superstructures as potential parts in nanotechnology. Nano Lett. 2004;4:1717–1723. doi: 10.1021/nl0494497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shu Y., Haque F., Shu D., Li W., Zhu Z., Kotb M., Lyubchenko Y., Guo P. Fabrication of 14 different RNA nanoparticles for specific tumor targeting without accumulation in normal organs. RNA. 2013;19:766–777. doi: 10.1261/rna.037002.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shu D., Huang L., Hoeprich S., Guo P. Construction of phi29 DNA-packaging RNA (pRNA) monomers, dimers and trimers with variable sizes and shapes as potential parts for nano-devices. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2003;3:295–302. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2003.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shu Y., Shu D., Haque F., Guo P. Fabrication of pRNA nanoparticles to deliver therapeutic RNAs and bioactive compounds into tumor cells. Nat. Protoc. 2013;8:1635–1659. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shu D., Shu Y., Haque F., Abdelmawla S., Guo P. Thermodynamically stable RNA three-way junctions for constructing multifuntional nanoparticles for delivery of therapeutics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011;6:658–667. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Haque F., Shu D., Shu Y., Shlyakhtenko L., Rychahou P., Evers M., Guo P. Ultrastable synergistic tetravalent RNA nanoparticles for targeting to cancers. Nano Today. 2012;7:245–257. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2012.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shu D., Zhang L., Khisamutdinov E., Guo P. Programmable folding of fusion RNA complex driven by the 3WJ motif of phi29 motor pRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;42:e10. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ponchon L., Dardel F. Recombinant RNA technology: the tRNA scaffold. Nat. Methods. 2007;4:571–576. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Severcan I., Geary C., Chworos A., Voss N., Jacovetty E., Jaeger L. A polyhedron made of tRNAs. Nat. Chem. 2010;2:772–779. doi: 10.1038/nchem.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nasalean L., Baudrey S., Leontis N.B., Jaeger L. Controlling RNA self-assembly to form filaments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:1381–1392. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Novikova I.V., Hassan B.H., Mirzoyan M.G., Leontis N.B. Engineering cooperative tecto-RNA complexes having programmable stoichiometries. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;39:2903–2917. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ishikawa J., Fujita Y., Maeda Y., Furuta H., Ikawa Y. GNRA/receptor interacting modules: versatile modular units for natural and artificial RNA architectures. Methods. 2010;54:226–238. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khisamutdinov E.F., Jasinski D.L., Guo P. RNA as a boiling-resistant anionic polymer material to build robust structures with defined shape and stoichiometry. ACS Nano. 2014;8:4771–4781. doi: 10.1021/nn5006254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Afonin K.A., Bindewald E., Yaghoubian A.J., Voss N., Jacovetty E., Shapiro B.A., Jaeger L. In vitro assembly of cubic RNA-based scaffolds designed in silico. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010;5:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ohno H., Kobayashi T., Kabata R., Endo K., Iwasa T., Yoshimura S.H., Takeyasu K., Inoue T., Saito H. Synthetic RNA-protein complex shaped like an equilateral triangle. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011;6:116–120. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shapiro B.A., Bindewald E., Kasprzak W., Yingling Y. Protocols for the in silico design of RNA nanostructures. Methods Mol. Biol. 2008;474:93–115. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-480-3_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee J.B., Hong J., Bonner D.K., Poon Z., Hammond P.T. Self-assembled RNA interference microsponges for efficient siRNA delivery. Nat. Mater. 2012;11:316–322. doi: 10.1038/nmat3253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guo P. Rolling circle transcription of tandem siRNA to generate spherulitic RNA nanoparticles for cell entry. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2012;1:e36. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2012.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jaeger L., Westhof E., Leontis N.B. TectoRNA: modular assembly units for the construction of RNA nano-objects. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:455–463. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.2.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leontis N.B., Westhof E. The annotation of RNA motifs. Comp. Funct. Genomics. 2002;3:518–524. doi: 10.1002/cfg.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chworos A., Severcan I., Koyfman A.Y., Weinkam P., Oroudjev E., Hansma H.G., Jaeger L. Building programmable jigsaw puzzles with RNA. Science. 2004;306:2068–2072. doi: 10.1126/science.1104686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dibrov S.M., McLean J., Parsons J., Hermann T. Self-assembling RNA square. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011;108:6405–6408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017999108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Severcan I., Geary C., Verzemnieks E., Chworos A., Jaeger L. Square-shaped RNA particles from different RNA folds. Nano Lett. 2009;9:1270–1277. doi: 10.1021/nl900261h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Garver K., Guo P. Mapping the inter-RNA interaction of phage phi29 by site-specific photoaffinity crosslinking. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:2817–2824. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.4.2817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chen C., Sheng S., Shao Z., Guo P. A dimer as a building block in assembling RNA: a hexamer that gears bacterial virus phi29 DNA-translocating machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:17 510–17 516. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M909662199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cayrol B., Nogues C., Dawid A., Sagi I., Silberzan P., Isambert H. A nanostructure made of a bacterial noncoding RNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:17 270–17 276. doi: 10.1021/ja906076e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lescoute A., Westhof E. Topology of three-way junctions in folded RNAs. RNA. 2006;12:83–93. doi: 10.1261/rna.2208106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Leontis N.B., Westhof E. Analysis of RNA motifs. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2003;13:300–308. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(03)00076-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Walter F., Murchie A.I., Duckett D.R., Lilley D.M. Global structure of four-way RNA junctions studied using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. RNA. 1998;4:719–728. doi: 10.1017/s135583829898030x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lilley D.M. Structures of helical junctions in nucleic acids. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2000;33:109–159. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500003590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Batey R.T., Rambo R.P., Doudna J.A. Tertiary motifs in RNA structure and folding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1999;38:2326–2343. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3773(19990816)38:16<2326::aid-anie2326>3.0.co;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Binzel D.W., Khisamutdinov E.F., Guo P. Entropy-driven one-step formation of Phi29 pRNA 3WJ from three RNA fragments. Biochemistry. 2014;53:2221–2231. doi: 10.1021/bi4017022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Krieg A.M. CpG motifs: the active ingredient in bacterial extracts. Nat. Med. 2003;9:831–835. doi: 10.1038/nm0703-831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Medzhitov R. CpG DNA: security code for host defense. Nat. Immunol. 2001;2:15–16. doi: 10.1038/83121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Latz E., Schoenemeyer A., Visintin A., Fitzgerald K.A., Monks B.G., Knetter C.F., Lien E., Nilsen N.J., Espevik T., Golenbock D.T. TLR9 signals after translocating from the ER to CpG DNA in the lysosome. Nat. Immunol. 2004;5:190–198. doi: 10.1038/ni1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hemmi H., Takeuchi O., Kawai T., Kaisho T., Sato S., Sanjo H., Matsumoto M., Hoshino K., Wagner H., Takeda K., et al. A toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature. 2000;408:740–745. doi: 10.1038/35047123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Borsi L., Carnemolla B., Nicolo G., Spina B., Tanara G., Zardi L. Expression of different tenascin isoforms in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic human breast tissues. Int. J. Cancer. 1992;52:688–692. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910520504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mo J.H., Park S.W., Rhee C.S., Takabayashi K., Lee S.S., Quan S.H., Kim I.S., Min Y.G., Raz E., Lee C.H. Suppression of allergic response by CpG motif oligodeoxynucleotide-house-dust mite conjugate in animal model of allergic rhinitis. Am. J. Rhinol. 2006;20:212–218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sandler A.D., Chihara H., Kobayashi G., Zhu X.Y., Miller M.A., Scott D.L., Krieg A.M. CpG oligonucleotides enhance the tumor antigen-specific immune response of a granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor-based vaccine strategy in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2003;63:394–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Saha A., Baral R.N., Chatterjee S.K., Mohanty K., Pal S., Foon K.A., Primus F.J., Krieg A.M., Weiner G.J., Bhattacharya-Chatterjee M. CpG oligonucleotides enhance the tumor antigen-specific immune response of an anti-idiotype antibody-based vaccine strategy in CEA transgenic mice. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2006;55:515–527. doi: 10.1007/s00262-005-0009-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Winter P.M., Morawski A.M., Caruthers S.D., Fuhrhop R.W., Zhang H., Williams T.A., Allen J.S., Lacy E.K., Robertson J.D., Lanza G.M., et al. Molecular imaging of angiogenesis in early-stage atherosclerosis with alpha(v)beta3-integrin-targeted nanoparticles. Circulation. 2003;108:2270–2274. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000093185.16083.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mohri K., Nishikawa M., Takahashi N., Shiomi T., Matsuoka N., Ogawa K., Endo M., Hidaka K., Sugiyama H., Takahashi Y., et al. Design and development of nanosized DNA assemblies in polypod-like structures as efficient vehicles for immunostimulatory CpG motifs to immune cells. ACS Nano. 2012;6:5931–5940. doi: 10.1021/nn300727j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Noel A., Jost M., Maquoi E. Matrix metalloproteinases at cancer tumor-host interface. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008;19:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Matsuoka N., Nishikawa M., Mohri K., Rattanakiat S., Takakura Y. Structural and immunostimulatory properties of Y-shaped DNA consisting of phosphodiester and phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides. J. Control. Release. 2010;148:311–316. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Narunsky L., Oren R., Bochner F., Neeman M. Imaging aspects of the tumor stroma with therapeutic implications. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014;141:192–208. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhang H., Endrizzi J.A., Shu Y., Haque F., Sauter C., Shlyakhtenko L.S., Lyubchenko Y., Guo P., Chi Y.I. Crystal structure of 3WJ core revealing divalent ion-promoted thermostability and assembly of the Phi29 hexameric motor pRNA. RNA. 2013;19:1226–1237. doi: 10.1261/rna.037077.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Collins T.J. ImageJ for microscopy. Biotechniques. 2007;43:25–30. doi: 10.2144/000112517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lyubchenko Y.L., Shlyakhtenko L.S. AFM for analysis of structure and dynamics of DNA and protein-DNA complexes. Methods. 2009;47:206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lyubchenko Y.L., Gall A.A., Shlyakhtenko L.S., Harrington R.E., Jacobs B.L., Oden P.I., Lindsay S.M. Atomic force microscopy imaging of double stranded DNA and RNA. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 1992;10:589–606. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1992.10508670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chadalavada D.M., Bevilacqua P.C. Analyzing RNA and DNA folding using temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (TGGE) with application to in vitro selections. Methods Enzymol. 2009;468:389–408. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)68018-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Li J., Pei H., Zhu B., Liang L., Wei M., He Y., Chen N., Li D., Huang Q., Fan C.H. Self-assembled multivalent DNA nanostructures for noninvasive intracellular delivery of immunostimulatory CpG oligonucleotides. ACS Nano. 2011;5:8783–8789. doi: 10.1021/nn202774x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mohri K., Takahashi N., Nishikawa M., Kusuki E., Shiomi T., Takahashi Y., Takakura Y. Increased immunostimulatory activity of polypod-like structured DNA by ligation of the terminal loop structures. J. Control. Release. 2012;163:285–292. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Murphy M.K., Piper R.K., Greenwood L.R., Mitch M.G., Lamperti P.J., Seltzer S.M., Bales M.J., Phillips M.H. Evaluation of the new cesium-131 seed for use in low-energy x-ray brachytherapy. Med. Phys. 2004;31:1529–1538. doi: 10.1118/1.1755182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lee F.T., Rigopoulos A., Hall C., Clarke K., Cody S.H., Smyth F.E., Liu Z., Brechbiel M.W., Hanai N., Nice E.C., et al. Specific localization, gamma camera imaging, and intracellular trafficking of radiolabelled chimeric anti-G(D3) ganglioside monoclonal antibody KM871 in SK-MEL-28 melanoma xenografts. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4474–4482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Afonin K.A., Cieply D.J., Leontis N.B. Specific RNA self-assembly with minimal paranemic motifs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:93–102. doi: 10.1021/ja071516m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bindewald E., Hayes R., Yingling Y.G., Kasprzak W., Shapiro B.A. RNAJunction: a database of RNA junctions and kissing loops for three-dimensional structural analysis and nanodesign. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D392–D397. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Petrov A.I., Zirbel C.L., Leontis N.B. WebFR3D–a server for finding, aligning and analyzing recurrent RNA 3D motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W50–W55. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jasinski D.L., Khisamutdinov E.F., Lyubchenko Y., Guo P. Physicochemically Tunable Poly-Functionalized RNA Square Architecturewith Fluorogenic and Ribozymatic Properties. ACS Nano. 2014 doi: 10.1021/nn502160s. doi:10.1021/nn502160s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


