Abstract
Background
Oxidative stress plays a role in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. Supplementing women with antioxidants during pregnancy may reduce oxidative stress and thereby prevent or delay the onset pre-eclampsia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementing vitamin C in pregnancy on the incidence of pre-eclampsia, at Mulago hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Methods
This was a (parallel, balanced randomization, 1:1) placebo randomized controlled trial conducted at Mulago hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Participants included in this study were pregnant women aged 15-42 years, who lived 15 km or less from the hospital with gestational ages between 12-22 weeks. The women were randomized to take 1000mg of vitamin C (as ascorbic acid) or a placebo daily until they delivered. The primary outcome was pre-eclamsia. Secondary outcomes were: severe pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, preterm delivery, low birth weight and still birth delivery. Participants were 932 pregnant women randomized into one of the two treatment arms in a ratio of 1:1. The participants, the care providers and those assessing the outcomes were blinded to the study allocation.
Results
Of the 932 women recruited; 466 were randomized to the vitamin and 466 to the placebo group. Recruitment of participants was from November 2011 to June 2012 and follow up was up to January 2013. Outcome data was available 415 women in the vitamin group and 418 women in the placebo group.
There were no differences in vitamin and placebo groups in the incidence of pre-eclampsia (3.1% versus 4.1%; RR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.37-1.56), severe pre-eclampsia (1.2% versus 1.0%; RR 1.25; 95% CI: 0.34-4.65), gestational hypertension(7.7% versus 11.5%; RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.43-1.03), preterm delivery (11.3% versus 12.2%; RR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.63-1.34), low birth weight (11.1% versus 10.3%; RR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.72-1.59) and still birth delivery (4.6% versus 4.5%; RR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.54-1.87).
Conclusions
Supplementation with vitamin C did not reduce the incidence of pre-eclampsia nor did it reduce the adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes. We do not recommend the use of vitamin C in pregnancy to prevent pre-eclampsia.
Trial registration
This study was registered at the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, PACTR201210000418271 on 25th October 2012.
Background
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide [1] especially in low resource settings [2]. Pre-eclampsia, defined by hypertension and proteinuria, is a multisystem disorder which is associated with, neurological disturbances, haematological disturbances, liver disease, and abnormal renal function [3, 4]. Pre-eclampsia affects 2-10% of all pregnancies and may be higher in low resource settings [5, 6].
Severe pre-eclampsia may result in serious complications like eclampsia and the HELLP syndrome although these complications are rare. In a study conducted in Mulago hospital, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia contributed to 12% maternal deaths among women admitted with severe maternal morbidity [7]. Pre-eclampsia contributes to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Pre-eclampsia contributed to 5.4% perinatal deaths and 24% of intrauterine growth restriction [8] and is associated with 25.8% of preterm births [9].Small-for-gestational age babies are associated with health risks later in life like obesity and insulin resistance, which may manifest as hypertension and diabetes [10]. Preterm delivery is associated with neonatal and infant mortality. Preterm infants are more prone to respiratory complications like respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the new born and persistent pulmonary hypertension [11].
Antioxidants are essential in maintaining cellular integrity in normal pregnancy by reducing lipid peroxidation reactions. Thus they protect proteins, enzymes, and cells from destruction by peroxides. Antioxidant defense mechanisms include intracellular and extracellular enzymes (viz. catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase), free radical scavengers (vitamin C & E, caretenoids, glutathione and serum albumin) and metabolites (bilirubin and uric acid) [12].
The aetiology of pre-eclampsia is unknown. There is incomplete trophoblast invasion of the spiral arteries [13] which lead to abnormal placental development and, placental hypo perfusion and ischemia. Women with pre-eclampsia have increased oxidative stress [14], increased markers of oxidative stress like, 8-iso-prostaglandinF2α, lipid peroxides [15] and, have low plasma and placental concentration of antioxidants [12, 16]. This has led to the hypothesis that placental hypo perfusion may promote a state of oxidative stress in which there is a release of factors to the maternal circulation [13, 17]. The factors include, lipid peroxides, cytokines and syncitiotrophoblast microvillus fragments [18] which are highly reactive molecules that consume the antioxidants.
Oxidative stress combined with an exaggerated inflammatory response may result in the release the maternal factors that cause endothelial dysfunction [18]. Endothelial cell dysfunction is responsible for the clinical signs of pre-eclampsia like hypertension and protienuria. Response to oxidative stress depends on availability of low density lipoproteins, genetic predisposition, immune mal-adaptation [19] and dietary deficiency of antioxidants [20]. Supplementation with antioxidants may modify the women’s response to oxidative stress and therefore limit the systemic and utero-placental endothelial damage observed in pre-eclampsia.
Vitamin C scavenges free radicals in aqueous solution and may have a role in the management of pre-eclampsia. Studies show that vitamin C may be protective against development of pre-eclampsia [21, 22]. Supplementation with vitamin C and E reduces oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction [23] and, pre-eclampsia [24]. However, subsequent studies have not confirmed this [25–27]. Most of these studies were conducted in high resource settings where the nutritional status of the women is high.
The purpose of this study therefore was to evaluate the effects of vitamin C supplementation on the occurrence of pre-eclampsia in a low resource setting where the nutritional status of the women is low and most pregnant women are deficient in vitamin C [28].
Methods
Trial design
This was a (parallel, balanced randomization, 1:1,) placebo controlled trial conducted from November 2011 to January 2013, in Uganda.
Participants
Participants included in this study were pregnant women aged 15-42 years, lived 15 km or less from the hospital with gestational ages between 12-22 weeks. Women were excluded if they had hypertension, renal diseases or diabetes mellitus, were taking vitamin C supplements of >200 mg/day or had contraindications to vitamin C.
Setting
This study was conducted at Mulago Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Mulago Hospital is a National Referral Hospital for Uganda and a Teaching Hospital for Makerere University College of Health Sciences. In Uganda about 90% of the women attend antenatal clinic at least once during pregnancy. Mulago hospital delivers about 22,000 women annually and about 50,000 women attend antenatal clinic in 1 year.
Interventions
The women were randomized in one of the two treatment arms using computer generated random numbers in a ratio of 1:1. The women allocated to the vitamin arm were advised to take a tablet of 1000 mg of vitamin C (as ascorbic acid) daily until they delivered. The women allocated to the placebo arm were advised to take a placebo tablet (micro-crystalline cellulose) daily which was identical to the vitamin tablets in shape, color and size. They were to swallow the tablets daily and leave the unused tablets.
Study procedures
Eligible women were identified from the antenatal clinic by research assistants who were trained midwives. The women were conducted through an informed consent procedure and gave a written informed consent. The women were interviewed about their socio-demographic characteristics, medical and family history, and their present and past obstetric performances. A thorough clinical and obstetrical examination was done, weight was taken and height measured. A mid upper arm circumference was measured by a trained assistant. Blood was drawn for complete blood counts, renal and liver function tests and HIV screening.
Follow up
All the women were followed until they delivered. The study participants received care according the Uganda Ministry of Health guidelines. Routine visits were done by the research team every four weeks until the women delivered. If a woman missed the scheduled visit she was contacted by telephone and visited at her home and, if necessary was transported to hospital for evaluation by the study physicians. During the routine assessments the women were asked about compliance with the study medication, condition of their health, and if they had visited other heath facilities and the medications they had taken. In addition they had a focused history and, obstetric examination using a standard clinical record form. At each visit the blood pressure of the women was measured using a mercury sphygmomanometer. Two blood pressure measurements were taken and an average was obtained. If a woman had a high blood pressure a mid-stream urine sample was collected for protein estimation using a dipstick. All the women received oral iron and folic acid supplements which they took daily and, de-worming tablets and intermittent presumptive treatment for malaria according to the Uganda Ministry of Health guidelines.
The women who developed hypertension were managed according to the protocol of the hospital.
Outcomes
The primary end point was development of pre-eclampsia in the mother. The secondary outcomes were development of severe pre-eclamsia and gestational hypertension in the mother and, in the infant were low birth weight, still birth delivery and preterm delivery.
Pre-eclampsia was defined as described by the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy [29]. Under this classification, hypertension was defined as a blood pressure of ≥140/90 mmHg measured with a woman in a sitting position using a mercury sphygmomanometer. The blood pressure was repeated after 4 hrs. Significant proteinuria was taken as ≥2+ protein on dipstick of mid stream urine or catheter specimen urine if membranes were ruptured on two urine specimens 4 hrs or more apart. Pre-eclampsia was taken as hypertension with significant proteinuria, after 20 weeks gestation.
A woman was taken to have severe pre-eclampsia if she developed one or more of the following: a blood pressure of ≥160 mmHg systolic or ≥110 mmHg diastolic, ≥3+ protein by dipstick on two urine samples taken four hours or more apart, visual disturbances, frontal or any type of headache, epigastric or right upper quadrant pain, pulmonary oedema or cyanosis, abnormal liver function, low platelets, oliguria of less than 500 ml in 24 hours and fetal growth restriction [30].
Gestational hypertension was defined as hypertension which developed after 20 weeks of pregnancy in a woman who previously had a normal blood pressure and the blood pressure reverted to normal after delivery.
Low birth weight was defined as delivery of a baby whose birth weight was less than 2500 gm. A still birth was defined as delivery of a baby which died in uterus after 24 weeks of pregnancy. Preterm delivery was taken as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation.
Sample size
We assumed that supplementation with vitamin C would lower the risk of pre-eclampsia by 50% compared to a placebo. We estimated the risk of pre-eclampsia to be 10% in the placebo arm based on the literature [31–33] and Mulago Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology annual reports [34]. Given these estimates a sample size of 932 women would give a power of 80% at 95% confidence level.
Interim analyses and stopping guidelines
We performed one interim analysis when the accumulating data had accrued approximately half the estimated sample size according to O’Brien-Fleming boundaries (DeMets error-spending function) at a level α = 0.05 (two sided); the significance level for the final analysis was α = 0.0459. A standardized test statistic was calculated for the incidence of pre-eclampsia and all adverse effects based on accrued data. The Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommended continuation of the study.
Randomization: sequence generation
An independent pharmacist allocated the active tablets or placebo tablets according to the computer generated randomization list. The study participants were given drugs every month until they delivered.
Randomization: type
The randomization sequence was created using stata 12 software package in ratio of 1:1. Permutated block size of 6 and 8 were used and these were varied at random.
Randomization: allocation concealment
The vitamin C and placebo tablets were identical in size, shape and colour. The study medications were packed in sealed white opaque bottles and were consecutively numbered for each woman according to the randomization schedule by a researcher who was not involved in the recruitment or clinical care.
Randomization: implementation
The randomization was done by an independent statistician who was not involved in the study. Computer generated randomization codes were used to generate the randomization list which were sent to the pharmacy.
The women were allocated a study number by the research assistants who recorded the enrollment date and escorted the women to the pharmacy to receive the treatment assignment code and received the study medications.
Blinding
The participants, the care providers and those assessing the outcomes were blinded to the study allocation.
Similarity of interventions
Rene Industries Ltd. (Kireka, Kampala, Uganda) prepared vitamin C (ascorbic acid) and identical placebo tablets (microcrystalline cellulose). The tablets were identical in color, shape and size.
Statistical methods
The Data were cleaned, coded and double entered using EPIDATA version 3.1 statistical package and transferred to STATA version 12 for analysis. Analyses were done using intention-to-treat principle: all randomly assigned groups were included in the group to which they were initially assigned. Women who were lost to follow-up were not included in the analyses of outcomes. Continuous variables were compared using a t-test and categorical variables between groups were compared using Chi squared test. Risks of the outcomes of interest were calculated and compared between the treatment and control arms. The results are presented as risk ratios with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Adjusted analyses were not done since the groups were comparable at baseline. This trial is registered as Pan African Clinical Trial, Registry PACTR 2012100000418271.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Makerere University College of Health Sciences Ethics Committee, The Mulago Hospital Ethics Committee, The National Council for Science and Technology in Uganda and the Uganda National Drug Authority. The women gave written informed consent.
Results
We screened 1,097 women, of which 956 were eligible but 932 women were willing to participate in the study and were randomized (466(50%) to the vitamin C group and 466(50%) to the placebo group). The losses to follow-up were 51(10.9%) women in the vitamin group and 48(10.3%) women in the placebo group (Figure 1). Recruitment started in November 2011 and was completed in June 2012.
Figure 1.
Trial profile.
The enrollment and randomization of the women is as shown in Figure 1 below according to the flow chart suggested by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) [35].
Recruitment
Eligible participants were recruited from November 2011 to June 2012. Participants attended the clinic at the time of randomization (baseline) and at four weekly intervals until January 2013.
Baseline data
The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were no differences in the participants’ baseline characteristics (viz. age, educational level, marital status, parity, alcohol consumption, HIV status, smoking status, booking gestational age and booking blood pressure) at randomization.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the participants
| Characteristic | Vitamin C (N = 466) | Placebo (N = 466) | P values |
|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Age group (years) | 0.77 | ||
| ≤19 | 91 (19.5) | 98 (21.0) | |
| 20-29 | 247 (53.0) | 253 (54.3) | |
| 30-34 | 79 (17.0) | 69 (14.8) | |
| ≥35 | 49 (10.5) | 46 (9.9) | |
| Marital status | 0.12 | ||
| Married | 403 (86.5) | 386 (82.8) | |
| Single | 63 (13.5) | 80 (17.2) | |
| Educational level | 0.41 | ||
| Primary or less | 186 (39.9) | 174 (37.3) | |
| Secondary or above | 280 (60.1) | 292 (62.7) | |
| Parity | 0.86 | ||
| Primigravidae | 135 (29.0) | 129 (27.7) | |
| Gravida 2-3 | 187 (40.1) | 186 (39.9) | |
| Gravida ≥4 | 144 (30.9) | 151 (32.4) | |
| Alcohol consumption | 0.8 | ||
| Yes | 41 (8.8) | 39 (8.4) | |
| HIV status | 0.42 | ||
| Positive | 39 (8.4) | 46 (9.9) | |
| Negative | 427 (91.6) | 420 (90.1) | |
| Smoking | 0.99 | ||
| Yes | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.2) | |
| *Booking gestational age | 19.3 (SD 3.8) | 19.7 (SD 4.0) | |
| *Booking systolic BP (mmHg) | 113.9 (SD 12.8) | 114.9 (SD 14.1) | |
| *Booking diastolic BP (mmHg) | 67.5 (11.4) | 68.1 (11.2) | |
| Hypertension in family | 0.31 | ||
| Yes | 64 (13.7) | 75 (16.1) |
*These are presented as means (standard deviations). BP: Blood pressure, HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus. For binary variable only yes category was reported.
Numbers analyzed
The primary analysis was by intention-to-treat and patients were analyzed in the groups in which they were randomly assigned. Fifty one women in the vitamin group were lost to follow up, therefore 415 women were available for the analysis of outcomes; meanwhile 48 women were lost to follow up in the placebo group and 418 women were available for analysis of outcomes. Eight women in the vitamin group and 6 women in the placebo group had changed their residences; the rest of the women could not be traced by telephone. There were no differences in the demographic characteristics in the women who were lost to follow up (Table 2). There were no differences in the baseline characteristics between the women who were lost to follow up and the women who turned up.
Table 2.
Characteristics of women lost to follow up in the clinical trial
| Characteristic | Vitamin C N = 51 | Placebo N = 48 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Age group (years) | 0.4 | ||
| ≤19 | 17 (33.3) | 21 (43.7) | |
| 20-29 | 21 (41.2) | 21 (43.7) | |
| 30-34 | 6 (11.8) | 3 (6.3) | |
| ≥35 | 7 (13.7) | 3 (6.3) | |
| Marital status | 0.5 | ||
| Married | 37 (72.6) | 32 (66.7) | |
| Single | 14 (27.4) | 16 (33.3) | |
| Educational level | 0.6 | ||
| Primary or less | 25 (49) | 26 (54) | |
| Secondary or above | 26 (51) | 22 (46) | |
| Parity | 0.8 | ||
| Primigravidae | 24 (47.0) | 25 (52.1) | |
| Gravid 2-3 | 13 (25.5) | 10 (20.8) | |
| Gravid ≥4 | 14 (27.5) | 13 (27.1) | |
| Alcohol consumption | 0.3 | ||
| Yes | 2 (3.9) | 4 (8.3) | |
| HIV status | 0.7 | ||
| Positive | 4 (7.8) | 3 (6.3) | |
| Negative | 47 (92.2) | 45 (93.7) | |
| Hypertension in family | 0.6 | ||
| Yes | 7 (13.7) | 8 (16.7) |
HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus.
Compliance was assessed as the percentage of tablets consumed over the total number of tablets supplied. Compliance was similar in both groups (median 85%).
Outcomes
The primary outcome was the incidence of pre-eclampsia. Pre-eclampsia was 3.1% in the vitamin group and 4.1% in the placebo group (RR: 0.77; 95% CI 0.37-1.56) (Table 3). The secondary maternal outcomes were: severe pre-eclampsia 1.2% in the vitamin and 1.0% in the placebo group (RR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.34-4.65) and gestational hypertension 7.7 in the vitamin and 11.5 in the placebo group (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.43-1.03). Other maternal outcomes: ante partum haemorrhage, premature rupture of membranes and abruption placenta were similar in both groups (Table 3). There were two cases of eclampsia in the placebo group.
Table 3.
Maternal outcomes between the vitamin and placebo groups
| Characteristic | Vitamin C | Placebo | Risk ratio | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 415 | N = 418 | |||
| Pre-eclampsia | ||||
| Yes | 13 (3.1) | 17 (4.1) | 0.77 (0.37-1.56) | 0.4 |
| Severe pre-eclampsia | ||||
| Yes | 5 (1.2) | 4 (1.0) | 1.25 (0.34-4.65) | 0.72 |
| Gestational hypertension | ||||
| Yes | 32 (7.7) | 48 (11.5) | 0.67 (0.43-1.03) | 0.06 |
| Ante partum haemorrhage | ||||
| Yes | 7 (1.7) | 9 (2.2) | 0.78 (0.29-2.1) | 0.6 |
| Premature rupture of membranes | ||||
| Yes | 15 (3.6) | 19 (4.6) | 0.79 (0.41-1.54) | 0.5 |
| Abruption | ||||
| Yes | 1 (0.2) | 2 (0.5) | 0.5 (0.04-5.53) | 0.6 |
| Delivery route | ||||
| Vaginal | 278 (67.0) | 281 (67.2) | 1.0 (0.82-1.22) | 0.9 |
| Caesarean | 137 (33.0) | 137 (32.8) | ||
| Twin delivery | ||||
| Yes | 14 (3.4) | 11 (2.6) | 1.28 (0.59-2.79) | 0.5 |
| Eclampsia | ||||
| Yes | 0 (0) | 2 (0.5) | 0 |
For binary variable, only the Yes category has been reported.
Overall, the incidence of pre-eclampsia was 3.6% (30/833). The incidence was 1.9% (4/215) among primigravidae, 2.3% (8/350) among gravida two to three, and 6.7% (18/268) among women who were gravida four or more (Table 4).
Table 4.
Incidence of pre-eclampsia in the different parities
| Characteristic | Pre-eclampsia | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Parity | n (%) | |
| Primegravidae | 4 (1.8) | 0.5-4.6 |
| Gravida 2-3 | 8 (2.3) | 0.9-4.6 |
| Gravida ≥4 | 18 (6.7) | 4.0-10.4 |
| Total | 30 (3.6) |
CI: Confidence Interval.
The secondary neonatal outcomes were low birth weight, still birth delivery and preterm delivery. The low birth weight rate was 11.1% in the vitamin group and 10.3% in the placebo group (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.72-1.59), the still birth rate was 4.6% in vitamin group and 4.5% in the placebo group (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.54-1.87) and preterm delivery was 11.3% in the vitamin C group and 12.2% in the placebo group (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.63-1.34) There were no differences in the other neonatal outcomes between the groups (Table 5).
Table 5.
Neonatal outcomes between the vitamin and placebo groups
| Characteristic | Vitamin C (N = 415) | Placebo (N = 418) | Risk ratio | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | |||
| Birth weight | 0.7 | |||
| <2500 gm | 46 (11.1) | 43 (10.3) | 1.07 (0.72-1.59) | |
| ≥2500 gm | 369 (88.9) | 375 (89.7) | ||
| Apgar score | 0.4 | |||
| <7 | 41 (9.9) | 35 (8.4) | 1.17 (0.76-1.81) | |
| ≥7 | 374 (90.1) | 383 (91.6) | ||
| Admission to special care unit | 0.07 | |||
| Yes | 41 (9.9) | 27 (6.5) | 1.53 (0.95-2.43) | |
| Still birth | 0.9 | |||
| Yes | 19 (4.6) | 19 (4.5) | 1.01 (0.54-1.87) | |
| Early neonatal death | 0.4 | |||
| Yes | 7 (1.7) | 10 (2.4) | 0.71 (0.27-1.83) | |
| Abortion | 0.9 | |||
| Yes | 9 (2.2) | 9 (2.2) | 1.01 (0.40-2.51) | |
| Preterm delivery | 0.7 | |||
| Yes | 47 (11.3) | 51 (12.2) | 0.92 (0.63-1.34) |
For binary categories, only the yes category was reported.
Discussion
This study was a randomized placebo controlled trial in which antioxidant vitamin C was given to healthy pregnant women daily from the second trimester until they delivered to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. Supplementation with high doses of vitamin C did not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. This is in contrast with an earlier study by Chappell and colleagues [24] which investigated the effect of 1000 mg of vitamin C and 400 IU of vitamin E on 239 women from 18-22 weeks gestation until delivery on the risk of pre-clamspia. The incidence of pre-eclampsia was 8% in the supplemented group versus 17% in the placebo group. However, in this study pre-eclampsia was a secondary outcome and the study was stopped early because the interim analysis indicated that there was significant improvement in the markers of endothelial activation which was the primary outcome and thus there were only 79 women in the vitamin group who completed the study versus 142 in the placebo arm. There could have been type I error since the sample size was small.
The other studies [22, 36] in which vitamin C was shown to be of benefit were epidemiological studies. Zhang and colleagues [36] conducted a case-control study in which women with a low intake of vitamin C were at an increased risk of pre-eclampsia. There could have been a recall bias by the women and the study design could not establish a cause-effect relationship. Similarly, Klemmensen and others [22] conducted a prospective population based cohort study in which women with a low dietary intake of vitamin C were found to have an increased risk of severe forms of pre-eclampsia. There could have been a misclassification of pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive diseases in pregnancy since the case ascertainment were a self report by the women. There could have also been a recall bias by the women on the food consumption and hence the evaluations of the vitamin C intake may not have been accurate.
However, the finding in our study is in agreement with what found by other researchers about use of antioxidants to prevent pre-eclampsia [25–27, 37]. Beazley and colleagues [25] studied the use of antioxidants among women at increased risk of pre-eclampsia. They did not find a difference in the incidence of pre-eclampsia among women who received antioxidants and placebo group. However, this study was terminated early because of lack of funding and the required sample size was not realized. Rumbold and colleagues [26] studied low risk women with a high nutritional status in which high dose vitamin C and vitamin E were given from second trimester until delivery. There was no reduction in pre-eclampsia between the two groups. In this study, the women’s baseline intake of vitamin supplements was above the recommended daily intake. In a study by Poston and collegues [37], women who were at an increased risk of pre-eclampsia were supplemented with high doses of vitamin C and vitamin E from the second trimester until they delivered. There was no reduction in the incidence of pre-eclampsia between the two groups.
Oxidative stress has been shown to play a role in the aetiology of pre-eclapmsia [15, 38, 39], and women with pre-eclampsia have increased markers of oxidative stress in the plasma and in the placenta [13]. However, results from this study and others indicate that use of high doses of antioxidants during pregnancy does not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia. The explanation for this finding may be that while oxidative stress is present in women with pre-eclampsia, it may not play an important role in the pathophysiology of the disorder. It may also be possible that oxidative stress plays a role only in a subgroup of women with no appreciable effect on the general population. It also is possible that the women in our study had sufficient concentrations of vitamin C at trial entry. We based our assumptions on a previous study [40] in which most women were deficient of vitamin C. However, doses of vitamin C of 400 mg per day or higher result in plasma and tissue saturation and produces a steady-plasma concentration. When vitamin C doses of 500 mg per day or higher are given, the extra absorbed vitamin C is excreted to produce a steady plasma and tissue concretions [41]. Even in women who were at high risk of pre-eclampsia and nutritionally deficient [27], the antioxidants did not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia.
In this paper the rate of severe pre-eclampsia was similar in intervention and placebo groups. This is similar to what was found in other studies among high risk women [24, 27, 37, 42] and women at low risk [43]. Similarly the rate of gestational hypertension did not differ between the intervention and placebo group. This is in agreement with was found by Villar and colleagues [27] in high risk women but is in contrast to what was found by Poston and colleagues [37] in high risk women and Roberts and colleagues [43] in low risk women in which women who took antioxidants were more likely to develop gestational hypertension than the controls. In addition, Poston and colleagues [37] and Rumbold and colleagues [26] found that women who took antioxidants were more likely to use antihypertensive therapy than controls. This was probably due to chance, but antioxidants may promote DNA oxidation through an interaction between vitamin C and metal ions [44, 45] leading lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress and, may produce mutagenic lesions in DNA [45].
In our study the low birth weight delivery rate was similar in the both the vitamin and placebo groups. This is in agreement with a study by Roberts and colleagues [43] in low risk women and Spinnato and colleagues [42] and, Villar and colleagues [27] in high risk women, in which the rates of low birth weight delivery was similar in the antioxidant and placebo group. But it differs from what was found by Poston and colleagues [37] in high risk women in which women who were supplemented with antioxidants were more likely to deliver low birth weight babies than the controls. This could be because the women who took supplements developed pre-eclampsia earlier and hence delivered at an earlier gestational age. An earlier study showed that vitamin C supplements given during pregnancy were associated with preterm delivery than controls [46] although this did not translate in poorer neonatal outcomes. However, this was more likely to be a chance finding as more women in this group had a previous history of miscarriage and ante partum haemorrhage.
In our study preterm delivery was similar between the intervention and control groups. This is similar to what was found in another study of intervention with antioxidants in high risk [27, 42] and low risk women [43]. The rate of still birth delivery was similar in intervention and control group. This similar to what was found by Roberts and colleagues [43] and Rumbold and colleagues [26] in low risk women and by Spinnato and colleagues [42] and by Villar and colleagues [27] in high risk women. However, post hoc analyses in the Rumbold and colleagues [26] study showed more still birth delivery in women who took antioxidants than the controls. However, the still birth rate was extremely high among women in this study. This could have been be due to delay of the women to reach the hospital after labour had started and institutional delay especially for women who needed caesarean section as the waiting time on average was 4-6 hours.
The other maternal outcomes (viz. ante partum haemorrhage, premature rupture of membranes, abruption placentae, mode of delivery) and neonatal outcomes (viz., apgar score, admission to the baby neonatal unit, early neonatal death) did not differ between the intervention and placebo groups.
Limitations
This study was conducted in the national referral hospital and some findings may not be generalized to all pregnant women in Uganda. The incidence of pre-eclampsia was lower than was initially anticipated. This could have led to estimation of a smaller sample size. Therefore the results should be interpreted with caution as they may not be generalized to all pregnant women because of type II error. However, this study has enabled us to establish the effects of vitamin C supplementation on other pregnancy outcomes in Uganda.
Conclusion
Supplementation with high dose vitamin C did not reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia nor did it reduce the risk of low birth weight delivery, still birth delivery and preterm delivery in low risk women with poor nutritional status in our institution. We do not recommend the use of high dose vitamin C in pregnancy to prevent pre-eclampsia or other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York fund offered by Makerere University. We acknowledge the support of the African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC) and, Mulago Hospital Management for reviewing and permitting us to conduct this study.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
PK conceived, designed the study, participated in the data collection and analysis, and drafted the manuscript. NMT participated in the study design, analysis and reviewed the manuscript. GW, PO and GSB participated in the study conception and design and critically reviewed the manuscript. JW participated in the study design, data management and critically reviewed the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Paul Kiondo, Email: kiondop@yahoo.com.
Gakenia Wamuyu-Maina, Email: wmaina@rcqhc.org.
Julius Wandabwa, Email: gjwandabwa@yahoo.com.
Gabriel S Bimenya, Email: gsbimenya@chs.mak.ac.ug.
Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye, Email: orgnmtumwesigye@gmail.com.
Pius Okong, Email: mrokong@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Duley L. Maternal mortality associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99(7):547–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hogberg U. The World Health Report 2005: “make every mother and child count” - including Africans. Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(6):409–411. doi: 10.1080/14034940500217037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Many A, Hubel CA, Fisher SJ, Roberts JM, Zhou Y. Invasive cytotrophoblasts manifest evidence of oxidative stress in preeclampsia. Am J Pathol. 2000;156(1):321–331. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64733-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics ACOG practice bulletin: diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia: number 33, January 2002. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:159–167. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01747-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Onah HE, Okaro JM, Umeh U, Chigbu CO. Maternal mortality in health institutions with emergency obstetric care facilities in Enugu State, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25(6):569–574. doi: 10.1080/01443610500231484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sibai BM. Diagnosis and management of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(1):181–192. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00475-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wandabwa JN, Doyle P, Longo-Mbenza B, Kiondo P, Khainza B, Othieno E, Maconichie N. Human immunodeficiency virus and AIDS and other important predictors of maternal mortality in Mulago Hospital Complex Kampala Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:565. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Haddad B, Deis S, Goffinet F, Paniel BJ, Cabrol D, Siba BM. Maternal and perinatal outcomes during expectant management of 239 severe preeclamptic women between 24 and 33 weeks” gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(6):1590–1595. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Buchbinder A, Sibai BM, Caritis S, Macpherson C, Hauth J, Lindheimer MD, Klebanoff M, Vandorsten P, Landon M, Paul R, Miodovnik M, Meis P, Thurnau G, Miodovnik M, Meis P, Thurnau G. Adverse perinatal outcomes are significantly higher in severe gestational hypertension than in mild preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(1):66–71. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.120080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ong KK. Catch-up growth in small for gestational age babies: good or bad? Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2007;14(1):30–34. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e328013da6c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dudell GG, Jain L. Hypoxic respiratory failure in the late preterm infant. Clin Perinatol. 2006;33(4):803–830. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2006.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma R. Oxidative stress and its implications in female infertility - a clinician’s perspective. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(5):641–650. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61174-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Redman CW, Sargent IL. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science (New York, NY) 2005;308(5728):1592–1594. doi: 10.1126/science.1111726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Poston L, Raijmakers MT. Trophoblast oxidative stress, antioxidants and pregnancy outcome--a review. Placenta. 2004;25(Suppl A):S72–S78. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2004.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hubel CA. Oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1999;222(3):222–235. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1373.1999.d01-139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kiondo P, Tumwesigye NM, Wandabwa J, Wamuyu-Maina G, Bimenya GS, Okong P. Plasma vitamin C assay in women of reproductive age in Kampala, Uganda using a colorimetric method. Trop Med Int Health. 2012;17(2):191–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02907.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Roberts JM, Hubel CA. Is oxidative stress the link in the two-stage model of pre-eclampsia? Lancet. 1999;354(9181):788–789. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)80002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Roberts JM, Gammill HS. Preeclampsia: recent insights. Hypertension. 2005;46(6):1243–1249. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000188408.49896.c5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hiby SE, Walker JJ, O’Shaughnessy KM, Redman CW, Carrington M, Trowsdale J, Moffett A. Combinations of maternal KIR and fetal HLA-C genes influence the risk of preeclampsia and reproductive success. J Exper Med. 2004;200(8):957–965. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Roberts JM, Cooper DW. Pathogenesis and genetics of pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2001;357(9249):53–56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03577-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bodnar LM, Tang G, Ness RB, Harger G, Roberts JM. Periconceptional multivitamin use reduces the risk of preeclampsia. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(5):470–477. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Klemmensen A, Tabor A, Osterdal ML, Knudsen VK, Halldorsson TI, Mikkelsen TB, Olsen SF. Intake of vitamin C and E in pregnancy and risk of pre-eclampsia: prospective study among 57 346 women. BJOG. 2009;116(7):964–974. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chappell LC, Seed PT, Kelly FJ, Briley A, Hunt BJ, Charnock-Jones DS, Mallet A, Poston L. Vitamin C and E supplementation in women at risk of preeclampsia is associated with changes in indices of oxidative stress and placental function. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(3):777–784. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.125735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chappell LC, Seed PT, Briley AL, Kelly FJ, Lee R, Hunt BJ, Parmar K, Bewley SJ, Shennan AH, Steer PJ, Poston L. Effect of antioxidants on the occurrence of pre-eclampsia in women at increased risk: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354(9181):810–816. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)80010-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Beazley D, Ahokas R, Livingston J, Griggs M, Sibai BM. Vitamin C and E supplementation in women at high risk for preeclampsia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(2):520–521. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rumbold AR, Crowther CA, Haslam RR, Dekker GA, Robinson JS. Vitamins C and E and the risks of preeclampsia and perinatal complications. N Eng J Med. 2006;354(17):1796–1806. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Villar J, Purwar M, Merialdi M, Zavaleta N, Thi Nhu Ngoc N, Anthony J, De Greeff A, Poston L, Shennan A. World Health Organisation multicentre randomised trial of supplementation with vitamins C and E among pregnant women at high risk for pre-eclampsia in populations of low nutritional status from developing countries. BJOG. 2009;116(6):780–788. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02158.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kiondo P, Wamuyu-Maina G, Bimenya GS, Tumwesigye NM, Wandabwa J, Okong P. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia in Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. Trop Med Int Health. 2012;17(4):480–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02926.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin JM. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) Hypertens Pregnancy. 2001;20(1):9–14. doi: 10.3109/10641950109152635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.ACOG Practice Bulletin Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;77:67–75. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)80002-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hung TH, Burton GJ. Hypoxia and reoxygenation: a possible mechanism for placental oxidative stress in preeclampsia. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;45(3):189–200. doi: 10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60224-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2005;330(7491):565. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38380.674340.E0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kaye D, Mirembe F, Aziga F, Namulema B. Maternal mortality and associated near-misses among emergency intrapartum obstetric referrals in Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. East Afr Med J. 2003;80(3):144–149. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v80i3.8684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hospital M. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecolgy Annual Reports. 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang C, Williams MA, King IB, Dashow EE, Sorensen TK, Frederick IO, Thompson ML, Luthy DA. Vitamin C and the risk of preeclampsia--results from dietary questionnaire and plasma assay. Epidemiology. 2002;13(4):409–416. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200207000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Poston L, Briley AL, Seed PT, Kelly FJ, Shennan AH. Vitamin C and vitamin E in pregnant women at risk for pre-eclampsia (VIP trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367(9517):1145–1154. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68433-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Roberts JM, Speer P. Antioxidant therapy to prevent preeclampsia. Semin Nephrol. 2004;24(6):557–564. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mignini LE, Latthe PM, Villar J, Kilby MD, Carroli G, Khan KS. Mapping the theories of preeclampsia: the role of homocysteine. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):411–425. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000151117.52952.b6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kiondo P, Tumwesigye NM, Wandabwa J, Wamuyu-Maina G, Bimenya GS, Okong P. Plasma vitamin C assay in women of reproductive age in Kampala, Uganda, using a colorimetric method. TM & IH: Tropical medicine & international health; 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Padayatty SJ, Katz A, Wang Y, Eck P, Kwon O, Lee JH, Chen S, Corpe C, Dutta A, Dutta SK, Levine M. Vitamin C as an antioxidant: evaluation of its role in disease prevention. J Am Coll Nutr. 2003;22(1):18–35. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2003.10719272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Spinnato JA, 2nd, Freire S, Pinto ESJL, Cunha Rudge MV, Martins-Costa S, Koch MA, Goco N, Santos Cde B, Cecatti JG, Costa R, Ramos JG, Moss N, Sibai BM. Antioxidant therapy to prevent preeclampsia: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(6):1311–1318. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000289576.43441.1f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Roberts JM, Myatt L, Spong CY, Thom EA, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Pearson GD, Wapner RJ, Varner MW, Thorp JM, Jr, Mercer BM, Peaceman AM, Ramin SM, Carpenter MW, Samuels P, Sciscione A, Harper M, Smith WJ, Saade G, Sorokin Y, Anderson GB, Mercer BM, Peaceman AM, Ramin SM, Carpenter MW, Samuels P, Sciscione A, Harper M, Smith WJ, Saade G, et al. Vitamins C and E to prevent complications of pregnancy-associated hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(14):1282–1291. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Carr A, Frei B. Does vitamin C act as a pro-oxidant under physiological conditions? FASEB J. 1999;13(9):1007–1024. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.13.9.1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rietjens IM, Boersma MG, Haan L, Spenkelink B, Awad HM, Cnubben NH, van Zanden JJ, Woude H, Alink GM, Koeman JH. The pro-oxidant chemistry of the natural antioxidants vitamin C, vitamin E, carotenoids and flavonoids. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002;11(3–4):321–333. doi: 10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Steyn PS, Odendaal HJ, Schoeman J, Stander C, Fanie N, Grove D. A randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of ascorbic acid supplementation for the prevention of preterm labour. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23(2):150–155. doi: 10.1080/014436103000074673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Pre-publication history
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/283/prepub