Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer J. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):265–271. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000059

Biochemical Signaling of PD-1 on T Cells and Its Functional Implications

Vassiliki A Boussiotis 1, Pranam Chatterjee 1, Lequn Li 1
PMCID: PMC4151049  NIHMSID: NIHMS609807  PMID: 25098287

Abstract

Maintenance of peripheral tolerance is essential for homeostasis of the immune system. While central tolerance mechanisms result in deletion of the majority of self-reactive T cells, T lymphocytes specific for self-antigens also escape this process and circulate in the periphery. To control the development of autoimmunity, multiple mechanisms of peripheral tolerance have evolved, including T cell anergy, deletion and suppression by regulatory T cells (Treg). The pathway consisting of the PD-1 receptor (CD279) and its ligands PD-L1 (B7-H1, CD274) and PD-L2 (B7-DC; CD273) plays a vital role in the induction and maintenance of peripheral tolerance. This pathway also regulates the balance between stimulatory and inhibitory signals needed for effective immunity and maintenance of T cell homeostasis. In contrast to this important beneficial role in maintaining T cell homeostasis, PD-1 mediates potent inhibitory signals that prevent the expansion and function of T effector cells and have detrimental effects on anti-viral and anti-tumor immunity. In spite of the compelling studies on the significant functional role of PD-1 in mediating inhibition of activated T cells, little is known about how PD-1 blocks T cell activation. Here, we will provide a brief overview of the signaling events that are regulated by PD-1 triggering and we will discuss their implications on cell intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms that determine the fate and function of T effector cells.

Introduction

PD-1 is a 288 amino acid protein, which is induced on T cells upon activation via the T cell receptor and via cytokine receptors14. PD-1 was initially identified as a molecule responsible for induction of cell death5. In contrast to its robust induced expression in activated mature T cells, PD-1 is expressed at low levels on CD4 CD8 double negative αβ and γδ T cells in the thymus6, suggesting that PD-1 has a dominant role in regulating peripheral and not central tolerance. PD-1 expression is also induced upon activation of natural killer T (NKT) cells, B cells, monocytes and certain subsets of dendritic cell (DC)4, 79. The ligands for PD-1, PD-L1 (also known as B7-H1) and PD-L2 (also known as B7-DC) have distinct expression patterns1013. PD-L1 is constitutively expressed in low levels on APCs (DCs, macrophages, and B cells) and is further upregulated upon their activation. PD-L1 is also induced on activated T cells1, 14. In addition, PD-L1 is expressed on a wide variety of nonhematopoietic cell types, including vascular endothelial cells, pancreatic islet cells, and sites of immune privilege including the placenta, testes, and eye. In contrast, expression of PD-L2 is induced primarily on DCs and macrophages upon activation14, 15. The identification of B7-1 as a ligand for PD-L116 also indicates that the physiologic role of this pathway in regulating T cell tolerance in specific microenvironments depends not only on the expression of PD-L1/2 but also on the selective and differential expression of B7-1.

Due to the cell-specific and tissue-specific distribution of PD-1 ligands, PD-1 mediates its effects during different phases of T cell activation. Specifically, PD-1 could exert its function during the initial phase of activation of autoreactive T cells by attenuating self-reactive T cells during presentation of self-antigen by dendritic cells (DCs)17, 18. A major role of PD-1, however, is to inhibit the functions of self-reactive and inflammatory effector T cells against non-hematopoietic tissues and mediates tissue tolerance to protect against immune-mediated tissue damage13, 19. The activation-induced expression of PD-1 suggests that PD-1-dependent inhibition functions after the initiation and rather in later phases of the immune response, which support sustained activation and T cell expansion20. Consistent with this property of PD-1 is the finding that when naïve TCR-transgenic T cells expressing the DO11.10 TCR from the PD-1 deficient and from WT DO11.10 transgenic mice were stimulated with PD-L1+ APC in vitro, PD-1 deficient T cells displayed higher numbers of cells with more than three divisions but not higher numbers of cells with one to two divisions, compared with their WT type counterparts21. The observation that implementation of PD-1 function requires prior T cell activation is further supported by the fact that transcription of PD-1 itself requires nuclear translocation of NFAT and binding for NFATc1 (NFAT2) to the promoter of the PDCD1, the gene encoding PD-1, inducing its transcription22. Together these findings suggest that PD-1 expression is induced after T cell activation, and subsequently, T cells expressing PD-1 become sensitive to PD-1-mediated inhibition through ligation by PD-L1/PD-L2. In addition to mediating T cell-intrinsic inhibitory effects by mediating signals to PD-1 positive activated T cells, PD-1 inhibits T cell responses by promoting the induction and maintenance of inducible Tregs (iTregs)23.

The role of PD-1 in the regulation of peripheral tolerance was first indicated by the finding that aged PD-1 deficient mice develop lupus-like glomerulonephritis and arthritis on the C57BL/6 mouse strain24. This condition highly resembles systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a prototype of human systemic autoimmune diseases, which is characterized by a wide variety of multiorgan injuries, among which hallmarks are proliferative glomerulonephritis and arthritis. In contrast, PD-1 deficiency in the BALB/C mouse strain results in dilated cardiomyopathy, which is mediated by antibodies to troponin I25. PD-1 deficiency in other genetic backgrounds results in organ-specific autoimmunity depending on the type of autoimmunity to which each mouse strain is prone2628. The natural role of PD-1 in organ-specific peripheral tolerance was confirmed by the observation that distinct single nucleotide polymorphisms of the PDCD1 are associated with distinct types of autoimmune diseases including SLE, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, multiple sclerosis, type I diabetes and Grave’s disease29, 30.

In contrast to the important beneficial role in maintaining peripheral tolerance and T cell homeostasis, PD-1 mediates potent inhibitory signals after ligation by PD-1 ligands expressed on malignant tumors and this effect has detrimental effects on anti-tumor immunity3133. Moreover, expression of PD-1 by “exhausted” virus-specific T cells that are characteristic of chronic viral infections prevents the proliferation and function of virus-specific T effector cells and clearance of the virus34, 35. Although the role of PD-1 in peripheral tolerance, anti-viral and anti-tumor immunity is well established, little is known about how PD-1 ligation exerts its effects on specific signaling targets and how these altered signaling events impact on various aspects of T cell function.

Structure of PD-1

PD-1 consists of a single N-terminal IgV-like domain, an approximately 20 amino acid stalk separating the IgV domain from the plasma membrane, a transmembrane domain, and a cytopslamic tail containing tyrosine-based signaling motifs. Due to the similarity of this structure with the structure of ICOS and CTLA-4, PD-1 was initially considered as a member of the CD28 superfamily. However, subsequently it became clear that PD-1 has distinct features that distant it from the classical members of the CD28 family (reviewed in 36). Specifically, CD28, CTLA-4 and ICOS have Src homology (SH2)-binding motifs (YxxM) located in the center of their cytoplasmic tails. CTLA4 and CD28 also have one and two SH3-bidning motifs (PxxP), respectively, in their cytoplasmic tails. However, no such SH2-binding or SH3-binding motifs are present in the cytoplasmcic tail of PD-1. Instead, the cytoplasmic tail of PD-1 contains an N-terminal sequence VDYGEL, forming an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM), defined as V/I/LxYxxL, which recruits src homology-2 (SH2) domain containing phosphatases37. The cytoplasmic tail of PD-1 also contains a C-terminal sequence TEYATI, forming an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif (ITSM), defined as TxYxxL (Figure 1). Such structure has been described in CD2 superfamily members38 and in the CD33-related Siglec family, which mediated inhibitory functions in neuronal cells39. Interestingly, the spacing between the ITIM and the ITSM motifs in the cytoplasmic tail of PD-1 and that of Siglec family members if conserved suggesting that spacing between these motifs will have an important functional role. An additional difference between PD-1 and the members of the CD28 family with possible functional implications, albeit currently unclear, is that CD28, ICOS and CTLA4 exist as dimmers, whereas PD-1 exists as a monomer40, 41.

Figure 1. Amino acid sequence of human PD-1.

Figure 1

Numbers below each line refer to the amino acid position. The IgV-like domain is underlined. The signals sequence (grey), transmembrane segment (blue), the ITIM and the ITSM motifs (green), and the tyrosines within these motifs (yellow) are highlighted.

Mechanisms of PD-1-mediated signal inhibition

The ITSM of PD-1 has a critical role in PD-1 mediated inhibitory function. Specifically, the ITSM tyrosine (Y248) of PD-1 associates with SHP-2 and is mandatory for initiation of PD-1-mediated inhibition of PI3K/Akt activation3, 42 (Figure 2). To study the role of the specific tyrosines in the cytoplasmic tail of PD-1 in primary human T cells, a chimeric CD28.PD-1 construct was generated, in which the extracellular domain of mouse CD28 was fused to the cytoplasmic tail of human PD-1 and was expressed in primary human T cells using a lentiviral vector-mediated transduction. This approach allowed dissecting the signals initiated via PD-1 containing an intact cytoplasmic tail or mutagenized forms of PD-1 cytoplasmic tail. Triggering of PD-1 mediated signals by using an anti-mouse CD28 mAb in primary human T cells expressing each of these chimeric constructs showed inhibition of PI3K/Akt activation and impaired IL-2 production upon stimulation via CD3 and CD28. These inhibitory effects on PI3K/Akt activation and IL-2 production were preserved when the ITIM tyrosine (Y223) in PD-1 cytoplasmic tail was mutagenized to phenylalanine (Y223F) but were lost when the ITSM tyrosine (Y248) was mutagenized (Y248F). In that system, the presence of Y248F mutation abrogated the interaction of PD-1 with SHP-23, 42.

Figure 2. Schematic presentation of the biochemical signaling altered by PD-1 and its functional implications.

Figure 2

Binding of SHP2 on ITSM and a yet unidentified partner on ITM of PD-1 inhibits TCR-mediated activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway and the PLCg-1/Ras/MEK/Erk1/2 pathway. As a consequence, T cells are unable to progress in the S phase of the cell cycle, to produce cytokines and genes responsible for the activation and differentiation programs initiated by TCR ligation. PD-1 has a major effect on the metabolic reprogramming of activated T cells by suppressing glycolysis and promoting FAO. This altered metabolic reprogramming impacts on the differentiation program of T cells by preventing generation of T effector cells and promoting generation of Treg cells.

The role of tyrosine Y248 in mediating the inhibitory effects of PD-1 in T cell activation is further supported by other studies, which employed different approaches. Specifically, PD-1 engagement inhibited B-cell receptor (BCR)-mediated Ca2+ mobilization and phosphorylation of Igβ, Syk, PLC-γ2 and Erk1/2, and these effects were dependent on SHP-2 recruitment to the ITSM tyrosine of PD-19. In addition, mass spectrometry studies to identify molecules interacting with phosphorylated PD-1 cytoplasmic domains showed that a phosphorylated peptide corresponding to ITSM of PD-1 could serve as a docking site of SHP-2 in vitro43. In contrast to the previous work performed in live cells3, this in vitro approach found that interaction with SHP-2 could also be detected when a phosphorylated peptide corresponding to ITIM of PD-1 was used for in vitro pulldown of interacting partners43. However, an interaction of the ITIM domain of PD-1 cytoplasmic tail with SHP-2 has not been documented in vivo.

Another puzzling question has been the role of SHP-2 versus SHP-1 in the inhibitory function of PD-1. Although the role of SHP-2 in mediating the inhibitory functions of PD-1 is well documented, it has been reported that SHP-1 can also be detected in the context of PD-1-mediated inhibition of T cell activation. Specifically, SHP-1 would be recruited to the ITSM of PD-1 cytoplamsic tail in the system of mouse/human CD28.PD-1 chimeric receptor3. Similarly to SHP-2, SHP-1 was also detected to interact with a phosphopeptide corresponding to the PD-1 ITSM using mass spectrometry43. Using live cell imaging it was determined recently that SHP-2 and not SHP-1 is the phosphatase, which interacts with PD-1 upon TCR mediated activation44. With this elegant system, the mechanism via which PD-1 inhibits T cell activation was studied in real time. This work revealed that PD-1 is translocated to dynamic TCR microclusters and accumulates at the signaling central supramolecular activation cluster (c-SMAC). SHP-2 is immediately recruited to PD-1 in the microclusters and associates with the ITSM of PD-1. Recruitment of SHP-2 to PD-1 correlated with dephosphorylation of TCR proximal signaling molecules within the PD-1-TCR microclusters. These studies provided evidence that localization of PD-1 within the TCR microclusters is required for the PD-1-SHP-2 association and PD-1-mediated inhibition of T cell activation. These findings suggest that PD-1, a molecule lacking enzymatic activity or direct interaction with enzymatically active molecules, becomes phosphorylated by protein tyrosine kinases that are activated upon TCR ligation and explain why PD-1 exerts its inhibitory function only upon simultaneous TCR ligation.

Although these compelling studies provided evidence that SHP-2 is colocalizes with PD-1 in the cSMAC and interacts with the ITSM of PD-1, these findings do not preclude a potential role of ITIM in the function of PD-1. Consistent with this hypothesis, using site directed mutagenesis and stable expression of mutagenized PD-1 constructs in Jurkat T cells, it was determined that although only mutation of Y248 abrogated interaction with SHP-2, both Y248 and Y223 were actively involved in the inhibitory effects of PD-1 on IL-2 production. Specifically, in T cells expressing either PD-1.Y223F or PD-1.Y248F, ligation of PD-1 with PD-L1-Ig fusion protein during TCR/CD3-mediated activation diminished IL-2 production by 50% but ligation of PD-1 in T cells expressing the double mutant PD-1.Y223F/Y248F almost abrogated IL-2 production45. These results indicate that although phosphorylation-dependent interactions of PD-1 with SHP-2 involve Y248 in the ITSM, yet unidentified interactions of Y223 in the ITIM are mandatory for PD-1-mediated inhibitory function on T cell activation.

Effects of PD-1 ligation on TCR downstream biochemical signaling

The first identified target of PD-1-mediated inhibitory function in T cells was the PI3K/Akt pathway. Interestingly, PD-1 ligation inhibits activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway in a manner distinct from that induced by CTLA-4. Specifically, it has been proposed that PD-1 blocks the CD28-mediated activation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) by recruiting SHP-2. In contrast, CTLA-4 directly inhibits Akt activation, but not PI3K activation, possibly by the association with protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A)42. However, CTLA-4 can also interact with SHP-2 and/or SHP-146. Furthermore, PP2A binds CTLA-4 but also CD2847, which mediates a positive signal upon TCR-mediated activation. Considering the complex and non-specific interactions of these phosphatases with stimulatory and inhibitory co-receptors, other mechanisms than differential recruitment of phosphatases might regulate PD-1-mediated inhibition of PI3K/Akt activation.

Recently, it was determined that at least one mechanism via which PD-1 inhibits activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway involves PTEN phosphorylation and phosphatase activity, mediated by CK248. PTEN is a serine/threonine phosphoprotein and a substrate of CK2 in vitro and in vivo. CK2 mediates phosphorylation of PTEN C-terminus serine/threonine cluster S380/T382/T383, which promotes PTEN protein stability, while reducing PTEN lipid phosphatase activity against its substrate PIP349, 50. During TCR/CD3 and CD28-mediated stimulation, PTEN is phosphorylated by CK2 in the Ser380/Thr382/Thr383 cluster within the C-terminus regulatory domain48. CK2-mediated phosphorylation on the C-terminus cluster stabilizes PTEN, resulting in increased protein abundance due to resistance to ubiquitin-dependent degradation, but suppressed PTEN phosphatase activity. PD-1 inhibits the stabilizing phosphorylation of the Ser380/Thr382/Thr383 cluster within the C-terminus domain of PTEN, thereby resulting in diminished abundance of PTEN protein but increased PTEN phosphatase activity (Figure 2). Remarkably, the CK2 phosphorylation sites in PTEN are conserved in species from mammals to Xenopus laevis, and clusters of putative CK2 phosphorylation sites are also present at the C-terminus of PTEN in Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae51. Thus, CK2-mediated phosphorylation of PTEN represents a dominant mechanism, which regulates PTEN phosphatase activity, and this mechanism is directly targeted by PD-1 to mediate its inhibitory effect on the PI3K/Akt pathway in T cells.

The second major signaling pathway, which is targeted by PD-1, is the Ras/MEK/Erk pathway43, 52. The major mechanism responsible for activation of Ras and its downstream MEK/Erk MAP kinase pathway in T cells involves the Ca2+- and DAG (CalDAG)-mediated activation of RasGRP15355, which are activated downstream of PLC-γ156 (Figure 2). Studies in primary human T cells revealed that MEK/Erk MAP pathway is a target of PD-1, an event secondary to inhibition of PLCγ-1 and Ras activation. The effect of PD-1 on MEK/Erk MAP kinases was selective because PD-1 ligation did not inhibit the activation of Jnk and p38 MAP kinases52. Although the PI3K/Akt and Ras/MEK/Erk pathways have been the center of attention as targets of PD-1, other signaling events initiated by TCR ligation are also attenuated by PD-1 ligation including ZAP70 and PKCθ activation43.

Functional implications of altered biochemical signaling induced by PD-1

PD-1 targets components of cell cycle machinery

A major downstream target of the synergistic effect of PI3K/Akt and Ras/MEK/Erk activation in T cells is the cell cycle machinery. Primary T lymphocytes naturally reside in the G0 phase and lack expression of cyclins, which are required to interact with cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) in order to form cyclin-Cdk holoenzyme complexes that drive cell cycle progression5759. Expression of D1-type cyclins occurs during entry into G1 phase, expression of cyclin E at the late G1 restriction point, and expression of cyclin A at the S phase. p27kip1, a member of the Kip/Cip family of Cdk inhibitors is abundantly expressed in T cells and interacts with Cdk2. Initiation of cell cycle progression in T cells requires ubiquitin-dependent degradation of p27kip1 thereby allowing activation of Cdk2 and entry to the S phase of the cell cycle. This event is regulated by Skp1-Cullin-F-box (SCF) family ubiquitin ligase, SCFskp2 60. TCR/CD3 and CD28 stimulation mediates transcriptional induction of Skp2, the substrate recognition component of the SCFskp2 ubiquitin ligase, and this induction of Skp2 expression requires simultaneous activation of both PI3K/Akt and Ras/MEK/Erk pathways61. In contrast, p38 MAP kinase has no effect on the expression of Skp2 and on the degradation of p27kip1 upon T cell activation. PD-1 during the T cell stimulation inhibited activation of the PI3K-Akt and Ras/MEK/ERK pathways, expression of Skp2 was abrogated resulting in elevated levels of p27kip1 and inhibition of Cdk2. Because of the impaired activity of Cdk2, T cells stimulated through PD-1 not only displayed decreased phosphorylation of Rb but also failed to phosphorylate the checkpoint inhibitor Smad3 on the Cdk2-specific site, leading to enhanced Smad3 transcriptional activity62, which resulted in the increased abundance of the G1 phase Cdk inhibitor, p15INK4B, and the abrogation of the Cdk-activating phosphatase Cdc25A63.

These findings identified how PD-1 inhibits cell cycle progression but also revealed an unexpected mechanism by which PD-1 might affect the fate of T cells by regulating Cdk2, which interacts with many signaling pathways and regulates multiple functional outcomes. In conjunction with cyclin E, Cdk2 phosphorylates the cell cycle inhibitor p27kip1 resulting in ubiquitin-targeted degradation, as mentioned above. Cdk2 promotes phosphorylation of Rb on specific sites thereby reversing its ability to sequester E2F64. Cdk2-mediated phosphorylation of Rb also impacts the interactions of Rb with histone deacetylases and other chromatin remodeling proteins65, 66. Cdk2-cyclin E also phosphorylates a number of substrates, which affect histone gene expression, centrosome duplication and replication origin licensing67, 68. Cdk2 directly regulates expression of genes including NFκB, Sp1, p300/CBP, and subunits of the RNA polymerase reviewed in69. Cdk2 also phosphorylates Smad3 and antagonizes its antiproliferative function induced by TGF-b whereas impaired phosphorylation on the cdk-specific sites renders Smad3 more effective in executing its antiproliferative function62. Thus, inhibition of Cdk2 activation by PD-1 may lead to differential phosphorylation of such Cdk2 substrates, resulting in a distinct program of gene expression, differentiation and function of T cells. Thus, due to its effects on Cdk2, PD-1 may regulate T cell properties and function by reprogramming transcriptional and epigenetic events independently of its effects as an inhibitor of cell cycle progression.

Synergistic signaling between PD-1 and TGF-b and implications on iTreg generation

PD-1 reduces the threshold of TGF-b–mediated signals thereby synergizing with TGF-b to promote the conversion of naïve T cells into inducible Treg (iTreg) cells. Specifically, PD-1 can mediate the formation of iTregs in the presence of minimal amounts of TGF-b or even in the absence of exogenous TGF-b23. Subsequent studies indicated that this effect of PD-1 was not due to inducing increased production of TGF-b or enhanced expression of TGF-b receptors. Instead the synergistic effect of PD-1 with TGF-b in the generation of iTreg was due to inhibition of Cdk2-mediated phosphorylation of Smad3, which resulted in an enhanced Smad3 transactivation in a TGF-b-independent manner. Thus, PD-1 synergizes with TGF-b-mediated signals at a level distal to the TGF-b receptor and regulates TGF-b-specific transcriptional events by directly regulating the function of Smad3. This synergizing effect of PD-1 with TGF-b signaling on naïve T cells promotes the differentiation of Treg cells thereby mediating suppression of T effector cells via a cell extrinsic mechanism. In addition, this effect can facilitate direct suppression of T effector cells via an intrinsic mechanism.

Generation of Treg cells requires the aLb2 (LFA-1) integrin70, 71. Inside-out signaling regulates attainment of the active, high affinity conformation of b2 integrin, which depends on activation of the small GTPase Rap172. Integrin activation is mandatory for the function of Treg cells73. Importantly, PD-1 does not inhibit TCR-mediated activation of Rap1, in contrast to targeting Ras52, indicating that PD-1 not only promotes the generation of Treg cells but supports pathways required for Treg cells to execute their immunosuppressive function.

PD-1 alters the metabolic reprogramming of activated T cells

Upon activation, naïve T cells undergo a metabolic reprogramming to glycolysis, which is required so support their growth, proliferation and effector functions74, 75. Signals from the CD28 costimulatory pathway and the γ-chain signaling cytokines promote this metabolic program76, 77. Divergence in the metabolic reprogramming of T cells is critical to imprint distinct T cell fates. This has been shown with the switch to glycolysis that accompanies effector T cell differentiation78 and the switch to fatty acid b-oxidation (FAO) that accompanies the conversion of T effector to T memory cells79. Furthermore, enforcing FAO by pharmacologic means promotes the generation of Treg cells80. We investigated the metabolism of T cells receiving PD-1 signals and we discovered that they were unable to engage in glycolysis, glutaminolysis or metabolism of branched chain amino acids but displayed increased rate of fatty acid oxidation (FAO)81. In contrast to inhibiting expression of receptors and enzymes involved in uptake and metabolism of glucose, glutamine and branched amino acids, PD-1 increased the expression of carnitine palmitoyl transferase (CPT1A), the rate-limiting enzyme of FAO (Figure 2). We determined that extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), an indicator of glycolysis, and oxygen consumption rate (OCR), an indicator of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), were increased upon T cell activation. Activated T cells receiving PD-1 signals had lower ECAR and OCR but higher OCR/ECAR ratio compared to T cells stimulated without PD-1 ligation. These findings indicated that in contrast to proliferating T cells, which preferentially use glycolysis for energy production, T cells receiving PD-1 signals are rather metabolically quiescence and preferentially use OXPHOS than glycolysis as indicated by the higher OCR/ECAR ratio. These findings indicate that PD-1 ligation alters the metabolic reprogramming induced upon T cell activation by inhibiting glycolysis and promoting FAO.

Concluding remarks

PD-1, initially considered a molecule regulating cell death, is now identified as a dominant inhibitory receptor, which alters the function of T cells upon antigen-specific stimulation. These altered responses result from inhibition of multiple signaling events initiated upon TCR ligation. PD-1-mediated altered signaling results in inhibition of T effector cell responses by cell intrinsic mechanisms. PD-1 impacts on the generation and expansion of T effector cells by targeting PI3K/Akt and Ras/MEK/Erk pathways both of which are required for the transcription of effector cytokines and for activation of cell cycle progression through transcriptional induction of Skp2. The effects of PD-1 on biochemical signaling pathways also promote the generation of iTreg cells via multiple mechanisms. First, by suppressing Akt activation, PD-1 promotes Foxp3 expression. Second, by inhibiting Cdk2, PD-1 enhances TGF-b-mediated transactivation of Smad3, thereby promoting Foxp3 transcription. Third, by suppressing glycolysis and promoting FAO, PD-1 specifically activates a metabolic program that promotes generation of Treg cells, while suppressing the generation of Th1 and Th17 cells. PD-1 does not mediate global inhibition of signaling events initiated upon T cell activation because certain biochemical targets such as activation of JNK and p38 MAP kinases and Rap1 GTPase remain unaffected by PD-1 ligation. The imbalanced activation of signaling pathways induced by PD-1 results in altered metabolic programs, differentiation profiles and functional properties of T cells with a net outcome of T cell quiescence and immune suppression. Better understanding of the biochemical signaling effects of PD-1 will shed light on the molecular mechanisms that are responsible for PD-1-mediated hyporesponsiveness in patients with chronic infections and cancer. Understanding of such signaling effects will also provide insight into the mechanisms responsible for the break of tolerance in patients with autoimmune diseases. Ultimately, such knowledge will guide the design of combinatorial therapies to modulate PD-1 and its downstream targets with the goal to improve immunity in chronic infections and cancer or to induce tolerance in the context or autoimmune diseases and allogeneic transplantation.

References

  • 1.Terawaki S, Chikuma S, Shibayama S, et al. IFN-alpha directly promotes programmed cell death-1 transcription and limits the duration of T cell-mediated immunity. J Immunol. 2011;186:2772–2779. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kinter AL, Godbout EJ, McNally JP, et al. The common gamma-chain cytokines IL-2, IL-7, IL-15, and IL-21 induce the expression of programmed death-1 and its ligands. J Immunol. 2008;181:6738–6746. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.10.6738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chemnitz JM, Parry RV, Nichols KE, et al. SHP-1 and SHP-2 associate with immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif of programmed death 1 upon primary human T cell stimulation, but only receptor ligation prevents T cell activation. J Immunol. 2004;173:945–954. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.2.945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Agata Y, Kawasaki A, Nishimura H, et al. Expression of the PD-1 antigen on the surface of stimulated mouse T and B lymphocytes. Int Immunol. 1996;8:765–772. doi: 10.1093/intimm/8.5.765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ishida Y, Agata Y, Shibahara K, et al. Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. Embo J. 1992;11:3887–3895. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05481.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nishimura H, Agata Y, Kawasaki A, et al. Developmentally regulated expression of the PD-1 protein on the surface of double-negative (CD4−CD8−) thymocytes. Int Immunol. 1996;8:773–780. doi: 10.1093/intimm/8.5.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moll M, Kuylenstierna C, Gonzalez VD, et al. Severe functional impairment and elevated PD-1 expression in CD1d-restricted NKT cells retained during chronic HIV-1 infection. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:902–911. doi: 10.1002/eji.200838780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yamazaki T, Akiba H, Iwai H, et al. Expression of programmed death 1 ligands by murine T cells and APC. J Immunol. 2002;169:5538–5545. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.10.5538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Okazaki T, Maeda A, Nishimura H, et al. PD-1 immunoreceptor inhibits B cell receptor-mediated signaling by recruiting src homology 2-domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase 2 to phosphotyrosine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:13866–13871. doi: 10.1073/pnas.231486598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tseng SY, Otsuji M, Gorski K, et al. B7-DC, a new dendritic cell molecule with potent costimulatory properties for T cells. J Exp Med. 2001;193:839–846. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.7.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Latchman Y, Wood CR, Chernova T, et al. PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:261–268. doi: 10.1038/85330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dong H, Zhu G, Tamada K, et al. B7-H1, a third member of the B7 family, co-stimulates T-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion. Nat Med. 1999;5:1365–1369. doi: 10.1038/70932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Keir ME, Liang SC, Guleria I, et al. Tissue expression of PD-L1 mediates peripheral T cell tolerance. J Exp Med. 2006;203:883–895. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brown JA, Dorfman DM, Ma FR, et al. Blockade of programmed death-1 ligands on dendritic cells enhances T cell activation and cytokine production. J Immunol. 2003;170:1257–1266. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.3.1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ, et al. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:677–704. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Butte MJ, Keir ME, Phamduy TB, et al. Programmed death-1 ligand 1 interacts specifically with the B7-1 costimulatory molecule to inhibit T cell responses. Immunity. 2007;27:111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Keir ME, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. PD-1 regulates self-reactive CD8+ T cell responses to antigen in lymph nodes and tissues. J Immunol. 2007;179:5064–5070. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Probst HC, McCoy K, Okazaki T, et al. Resting dendritic cells induce peripheral CD8+ T cell tolerance through PD-1 and CTLA-4. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:280–286. doi: 10.1038/ni1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reynoso ED, Elpek KG, Francisco L, et al. Intestinal tolerance is converted to autoimmune enteritis upon PD-1 ligand blockade. J Immunol. 2009;182:2102–2112. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Patsoukis N, Sari D, Boussiotis VA. PD-1 inhibits T cell proliferation by upregulating p27 and p15 and suppressing Cdc25A. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:4305–4309. doi: 10.4161/cc.22135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okazaki T, Okazaki IM, Wang J, et al. PD-1 and LAG-3 inhibitory co-receptors act synergistically to prevent autoimmunity in mice. J Exp Med. 2011;208:395–407. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Oestreich KJ, Yoon H, Ahmed R, et al. NFATc1 regulates PD-1 expression upon T cell activation. J Immunol. 2008;181:4832–4839. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Francisco LM, Salinas VH, Brown KE, et al. PD-L1 regulates the development, maintenance, and function of induced regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2009;206:3015–3029. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nishimura H, Nose M, Hiai H, et al. Development of lupus-like autoimmune diseases by disruption of the PD-1 gene encoding an ITIM motif-carrying immunoreceptor. Immunity. 1999;11:141–151. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80089-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nishimura H, Okazaki T, Tanaka Y, et al. Autoimmune dilated cardiomyopathy in PD-1 receptor-deficient mice. Science. 2001;291:319–322. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5502.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Okazaki T, Otaka Y, Wang J, et al. Hydronephrosis associated with antiurothelial and antinuclear autoantibodies in BALB/c-Fcgr2b−/−Pdcd1−/− mice. J Exp Med. 2005;202:1643–1648. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yoshida T, Jiang F, Honjo T, et al. PD-1 deficiency reveals various tissue-specific autoimmunity by H-2b and dose-dependent requirement of H-2g7 for diabetes in NOD mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:3533–3538. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710951105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang J, Yoshida T, Nakaki F, et al. Establishment of NOD-Pdcd1−/− mice as an efficient animal model of type I diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:11823–11828. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505497102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nielsen C, Hansen D, Husby S, et al. Association of a putative regulatory polymorphism in the PD-1 gene with susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. Tissue Antigens. 2003;62:492–497. doi: 10.1046/j.1399-0039.2003.00136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Prokunina L, Castillejo-Lopez C, Oberg F, et al. A regulatory polymorphism in PDCD1 is associated with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus in humans. Nat Genet. 2002;32:666–669. doi: 10.1038/ng1020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Currie AJ, Prosser A, McDonnell A, et al. Dual control of antitumor CD8 T cells through the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 pathway and immunosuppressive CD4 T cells: regulation and counterregulation. J Immunol. 2009;183:7898–7908. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kuang DM, Zhao Q, Peng C, et al. Activated monocytes in peritumoral stroma of hepatocellular carcinoma foster immune privilege and disease progression through PD-L1. J Exp Med. 2009;206:1327–1337. doi: 10.1084/jem.20082173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang L, Gajewski TF, Kline J. PD-1/PD-L1 interactions inhibit antitumor immune responses in a murine acute myeloid leukemia model. Blood. 2009;114:1545–1552. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-206672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Watanabe T, Bertoletti A, Tanoto TA. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and T-cell exhaustion in chronic hepatitis virus infection. J Viral Hepat. 2010;17:453–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2010.01313.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Day CL, Kaufmann DE, Kiepiela P, et al. PD-1 expression on HIV-specific T cells is associated with T-cell exhaustion and disease progression. Nature. 2006;443:350–354. doi: 10.1038/nature05115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Riley JL. PD-1 signaling in primary T cells. Immunol Rev. 2009;229:114–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00767.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Neel BG, Gu H, Pao L. The 'Shp'ing news: SH2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases in cell signaling. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28:284–293. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shlapatska LM, Mikhalap SV, Berdova AG, et al. CD150 association with either the SH2-containing inositol phosphatase or the SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase is regulated by the adaptor protein SH2D1A. J Immunol. 2001;166:5480–5487. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.9.5480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Crocker PR, Paulson JC, Varki A. Siglecs and their roles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:255–266. doi: 10.1038/nri2056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Riley JL, June CH. The road to recovery: translating PD-1 biology into clinical benefit. Trends Immunol. 2007;28:48–50. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2006.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Okazaki T, Honjo T. The PD-1-PD-L pathway in immunological tolerance. Trends Immunol. 2006;27:195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2006.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Parry RV, Chemnitz JM, Frauwirth KA, et al. CTLA-4 and PD-1 receptors inhibit T-cell activation by distinct mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:9543–9553. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.21.9543-9553.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sheppard KA, Fitz LJ, Lee JM, et al. PD-1 inhibits T-cell receptor induced phosphorylation of the ZAP70/CD3ζ signalosome and downstream signaling to PKCθ. FEBS Lett. 2004;574:37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yokosuka T, Takamatsu M, Kobayashi-Imanishi W, et al. Programmed cell death 1 forms negative costimulatory microclusters that directly inhibit T cell receptor signaling by recruiting phosphatase SHP2. J Exp Med. 2012;209:1201–1217. doi: 10.1084/jem.20112741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chatterjee P, Patsoukis N, Freeman GJ, et al. Distinct roles of PD-1 ITSM and ITIM in regulating interaction of PD-1 with SHP-2, ZAP-70 and Lck PD-1-mediated inhibitory function. Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. 2013 Abstract #191. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Waterhouse P, Penninger JM, Timms E, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders with early lethality in mice deficient in CTLA-4. Science. 1995;270:985–988. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5238.985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chuang E, Fisher TS, Morgan RW, et al. The CD28 and CTLA-4 receptors associate with the serine/threonine phosphatase PP2A. Immunity. 2000;13:313–322. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)00031-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Patsoukis N, Li L, Sari D, et al. PD-1 increases PTEN phosphatase activity while decreasing PTEN protein stability by inhibiting casein kinase 2. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33:3091–3098. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00319-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vazquez F, Ramaswamy S, Nakamura N, et al. Phosphorylation of the PTEN tail regulates protein stability and function. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:5010–5018. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.14.5010-5018.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Torres J, Pulido R. The tumor suppressor PTEN is phosphorylated by the protein kinase CK2 at its C terminus. Implications for PTEN stability to proteasome-mediated degradation. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:993–998. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009134200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Litchfield DW. Protein kinase CK2: structure, regulation and role in cellular decisions of life and death. Biochem J. 2003;369:1–15. doi: 10.1042/BJ20021469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Patsoukis N, Brown J, Petkova V, et al. Selective effects of PD-1 on Akt and Ras pathways regulate molecular components of the cell cycle and inhibit T cell proliferation. Sci Signal. 2012;5:ra46. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Roose JP, Mollenauer M, Gupta VA, et al. A diacylglycerol-protein kinase C-RasGRP1 pathway directs Ras activation upon antigen receptor stimulation of T cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:4426–4441. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.11.4426-4441.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ebinu JO, Stang SL, Teixeira C, et al. RasGRP links T-cell receptor signaling to Ras. Blood. 2000;95:3199–3203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ebinu JO, Bottorff DA, Chan EY, et al. RasGRP, a Ras guanyl nucleotide- releasing protein with calcium- and diacylglycerol-binding motifs. Science. 1998;280:1082–1086. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5366.1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bivona TG, Perez De Castro I, Ahearn IM, et al. Phospholipase Cgamma activates Ras on the Golgi apparatus by means of RasGRP1. Nature. 2003;424:694–698. doi: 10.1038/nature01806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Appleman LJ, van Puijenbroek AA, Shu KM, et al. CD28 costimulation mediates down-regulation of p27kip1 and cell cycle progression by activation of the PI3K/PKB signaling pathway in primary human T cells. J Immunol. 2002;168:2729–2736. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.6.2729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Appleman LJ, Berezovskaya A, Grass I, et al. CD28 costimulation mediates T cell expansion via IL-2-independent and IL-2-dependent regulation of cell cycle progression. J Immunol. 2000;164:144–151. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.1.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Boonen GJ, van Dijk AM, Verdonck LF, et al. CD28 induces cell cycle progression by IL-2-independent down-regulation of p27kip1 expression in human peripheral T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29:789–798. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199903)29:03<789::AID-IMMU789>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Carrano AC, Eytan E, Hershko A, et al. SPK2 is required for ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the cdk inhibitor p27. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999;1:193–199. doi: 10.1038/12013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Appleman LJ, Chernova I, Li L, et al. CD28 costimulation mediates transcription of SKP2 and CKS1, the substrate recognition components of SCFSkp2 ubiquitin ligase that leads p27kip1 to degradation. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:2123–2129. doi: 10.4161/cc.5.18.3139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Matsuura I, Denissova NG, Wang G, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinases regulate the antiproliferative function of Smads. Nature. 2004;430:226–231. doi: 10.1038/nature02650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Boutros R, Dozier C, Ducommun B. The when and wheres of CDC25 phosphatases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006;18:185–191. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. Living with or without cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases. Genes Dev. 2004;18:2699–2711. doi: 10.1101/gad.1256504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Harbour JW, Luo RX, Dei Santi A, et al. Cdk phosphorylation triggers sequential intramolecular interactions that progressively block Rb functions as cells move through G1. Cell. 1999;98:859–869. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81519-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Harbour JW, Dean DC. Chromatin remodeling and Rb activity. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12:685–689. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00152-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hua XH, Newport J. Identification of a preinitiation step in DNA replication that is independent of origin recognition complex and cdc6, but dependent on cdk2. J Cell Biol. 1998;140:271–281. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.2.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Harbour JW, Dean DC. The Rb/E2F pathway: expanding roles and emerging paradigms. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2393–2409. doi: 10.1101/gad.813200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wells AD. Cyclin-dependent kinases: molecular switches controlling anergy and potential therapeutic targets for tolerance. Semin Immunol. 2007;19:173–179. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wohler J, Bullard D, Schoeb T, et al. LFA-1 is critical for regulatory T cell homeostasis and function. Mol Immunol. 2009;46:2424–2428. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Marski M, Kandula S, Turner JR, et al. CD18 is required for optimal development and function of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. J Immunol. 2005;175:7889–7897. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.7889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Reedquist KA, Ross E, Koop EA, et al. The small GTPase, Rap1, mediates CD31-induced integrin adhesion. J Cell Biol. 2000;148:1151–1158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.148.6.1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Li L, Kim J, Boussiotis VA. Rap1A regulates generation of T regulatory cells via LFA-1-dependent and LFA-1-independent mechanisms. Cell Immunol. 2010;266:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2010.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Frauwirth KA, Thompson CB. Regulation of T lymphocyte metabolism. J Immunol. 2004;172:4661–4665. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.8.4661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rathmell JC, Vander Heiden MG, Harris MH, et al. In the absence of extrinsic signals, nutrient utilization by lymphocytes is insufficient to maintain either cell size or viability. Mol Cell. 2000;6:683–692. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Frauwirth KA, Riley JL, Harris MH, et al. The CD28 signaling pathway regulates glucose metabolism. Immunity. 2002;16:769–777. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00323-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wieman HL, Wofford JA, Rathmell JC. Cytokine stimulation promotes glucose uptake via phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt regulation of Glut1 activity and trafficking. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:1437–1446. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-07-0593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chang CH, Curtis JD, Maggi LB, Jr, et al. Posttranscriptional control of T cell effector function by aerobic glycolysis. Cell. 2013;153:1239–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pearce EL, Walsh MC, Cejas PJ, et al. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature. 2009;460:103–107. doi: 10.1038/nature08097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Michalek RD, Gerriets VA, Jacobs SR, et al. Cutting edge: distinct glycolytic and lipid oxidative metabolic programs are essential for effector and regulatory CD4+ T cell subsets. J Immunol. 2011;186:3299–3303. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Patsoukis N, Chatterjee P, Sari D, et al. PD-1 induces metabolic reprogramming of activated T cells from glycolysis to lipid oxidation. Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology. 2013 Abstract #187. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES