Abstract
Prostate cancer is a form of cancer that develops in the prostate, a gland in the male reproductive system. In the present study, the activation of the farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, was demonstrated to inhibit cell proliferation in LNcaP cells. Using clinical samples, mRNA and protein levels of FXR were found to be significantly decreased by quantitative PCR and western blot analysis in prostate cancer tissues. In vitro studies identified further that activation or overexpression of FXR suppressed prostate cancer cell proliferation as measured by BrdU incorporation assays. At the molecular level, the results further revealed that the expression of the tumor suppressor gene, PTEN, was upregulated by FXR activation. Therefore, the observations indicated that FXR functions as a tumor suppressor in prostate cancer, which may provide a novel method for molecular targeting cancer treatment.
Keywords: prostate cancer, farnesoid X receptor, PTEN, GW4064
Introduction
The farnesoid X receptor (FXR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, was initially isolated in the liver and identified as a bile acid sensor (1–5). FXR plays a critical role in the regulation of bile acid, cholesterol, triglyceride and glucose homeostasis (6–9). For example, ablation of the FXR in C57BL/6 mice was shown to result in severe hepatic cholestasis, liver steatosis and insulin resistance (6,9).
Previous studies have also hypothesized that FXR is involved in the regulation of tumorigenesis (10–13). One study demonstrated that male and female FXR knockout mice spontaneously developed liver tumors, which was accompanied with liver injury and inflammation (10). Loss of the FXR in ApcMin/+ and chronic colitis mouse models of intestinal tumorigenesis was shown to result in early mortality and increased tumor progression via the promotion of Wnt signaling by infiltrating neutrophils and macrophages and proinflammatory cytokine production (11). In addition, FXR agonists have been shown to reduce liver and intestine tumor growth and metastasis in an orthotopic mouse xenograft model (12). Furthermore, downregulation of FXR has been associated with multiple malignant clinicopathological characteristics in human hepatocellular carcinoma (13), indicating that FXR functions as an important tumor suppressor. However, whether FXR affects prostate cancer cell proliferation remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the roles and molecular mechanisms of FXR in prostate cancer cell proliferation.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and tissue samples
LNcaP cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). Cells were culture in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco-BRL, Beijing, China) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco-BRL). After seeding in the 96- or 6-well plates for 24 h, cells were treated with chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) (5 μM), GW4064 (2 μM) or vehicle control (DMSO). Small interfering RNA oligos targeting FXR or negative control (NC) were obtained from Genepharm Company (Shanghai, China). For the cell transfection experiments, LNcaP cells were grown to 70–80% confluence in six-well plates. The cells were transiently transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Prostate cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues were collected from patients undergoing routine therapeutic surgery at the Department of Urology Surgery in Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University (Shanghai, China). All the samples were collected from patients that provided informed consent, and the experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University.
mRNA isolation and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Total RNA was obtained from the tissue samples, and cells were harvested using TRIzol kits (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Quantitative PCR was performed using an Applied Biosystems 7900 Real-time PCR System (Shanghai, China) and a TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Takara, Dalian, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) assays
A cell proliferation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; BrdU kit; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) was used to analyze the incorporation of BrdU during DNA synthesis, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All the experiments were performed in triplicate, and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm using the Spectra Max 190 ELISA reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
Western blot analysis
Proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Bioscience, Little Chalfont, UK). Following blocking with 10% nonfat milk in phosphate-buffered saline, the membranes were immunoblotted with antibodies as indicated, followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA, USA). The signals were detected using a SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. Anti-FXR, -PTEN and -Akt antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Protein expression levels of GAPDH were used as an internal control.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean from at least three separate experiments. Differences between the groups were analyzed using the Student’s t-test, where P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Differences between the groups were analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t tests using SPSS version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL,USA).
Results
FXR activation inhibits cell proliferation
To evaluate the effects of FXR on prostate cancer cell growth, LNcaP cells were treated with the FXR agonists, CDCA and GW4064. As shown in Fig. 1, CDCA and GW4064 decreased the proliferative ability of LNcaP cells (Fig. 1). Next, endogenous FXR expression was silenced using specific small interfering RNA oligos in the LNcaP cells (Fig. 1B). As expected, CDCA and GW4064 were unable to exert antiproliferative roles in the presence of siRNA oligos targeting FXR (Fig. 1C), indicating that the antiproliferative roles of the two compounds were dependent on FXR expression.
FXR overexpression represses LNcaP cell proliferation
To further determine the potential functions of the FXR, LNcaP cells were transfected with plasmids encoding FXR cDNA or an empty vector (Fig. 2A). As a result, FXR overexpression resulted in decreased cell proliferation, as measured by BrdU analysis (Fig. 2B). Therefore, the results indicated that FXR may be a tumor suppressor in prostate cancer cells.
FXR upregulates the expression levels of the PTEN tumor suppressor
As FXR was shown to inhibit cell proliferation, the effects of the receptor on the expression of the genes associated with cell proliferation were investigated. Results from quantitative PCR analysis indicated that PTEN was highly upregulated following CDCA or GW4064 treatment, while other genes, including p53, FOXO1, E2F1 and RB1, remained unchanged (Fig. 3A). In addition, the upregulation of PTEN was confirmed by western blot analysis (Fig. 3B). Consistently, a reduction in the level of Akt phosphorylation was observed in the LNcaP cells treated with CDCA or GW4064 (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, PTEN expression was upregulated in the LNcaP cells transfected with FXR when compared with the cells transfected with the empty vectors (Fig. 3C and D).
FXR expression levels are decreased in prostate cancer tissues
Finally, whether FXR was differentially expressed in human prostate cancer tissues was investigated. The mRNA and protein expression levels were determined using quantitative PCR and western blot analysis, respectively, in human prostate cancer tissues and pair-matched adjacent normal tissues. The results demonstrated that FXR expression was significantly decreased in the prostate cancer tissues (Fig. 4A and B).
Discussion
In the present study, FXR activation or overexpression was demonstrated to inhibit cell proliferation in LNcaP cells. In addition, FXR expression was downregulated in prostate cancer tissues. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, the present study, for the first time, identified that FXR may be a tumor suppressor in the progression of prostate cancer. However, the mechanisms underlying FXR downregulation remain unknown. Previous studies have demonstrated that glucose, insulin, proinflammatory cytokines and certain microRNAs are able to regulate FXR in a variety of tissues or cells (14–16). Therefore, further research into whether these factors contribute to the downregulation of FXR expression in prostate cancer should be performed.
Previous studies have demonstrated that FXR can protect against tumorigenesis and inhibit cell proliferation in several cancer types, including hepatocellular carcinoma and colon cancer (10–12). Through the induction of downstream target genes, such as SHP, FXR suppresses cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis (17). Accordingly, SHP null mice were shown to develop spontaneous liver tumors, and the expression of SHP was demonstrated to be downregulated in human cancer tissues (18,19).
In the present study, the results revealed that the expression of the tumor suppressor gene, PTEN, was upregulated following FXR activation. In humans, the loss or mutation of PTEN has been observed in a group of autosomal dominant syndromes, which are characterized by neurological disorders, multiple hamartomas and cancer susceptibility (20). In prostate cancer tissues, aberrant methylation of the PTEN gene has been observed, which resulted in the inactivation of PTEN and the hyperactivation of Akt (21). Therefore, the FXR/PTEN signaling pathway may be a novel pharmaceutical target for the treatment of prostate cancer.
In conclusion, the key observation of the present study is that FXR inhibits the proliferation of prostate cancer cell lines via the upregulation of PTEN expression. Understanding the precise role played by FXR is likely to advance the knowledge of prostate cancer biology, which may be beneficial for future treatment.
References
- 1.Makishima M, Okamoto AY, Repa JJ, et al. Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids. Science. 1999;284:1362–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Urizar NL, Liverman AB, Dodds DT, et al. A natural product that lowers cholesterol as an antagonist ligand for FXR. Science. 2002;296:1703–1706. doi: 10.1126/science.1072891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hollman DA, Milona A, van Erpecum KJ, van Mil SW. Anti-inflammatory and metabolic actions of FXR: insights into molecular mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1821:1443–1452. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Matsubara T, Li F, Gonzalez FJ. FXR signaling in the enterohepatic system. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013;368:17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2012.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Porez G, Prawitt J, Gross B, Staels B. Bile acid receptors as targets for the treatment of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease. J Lipid Res. 2012;53:1723–1737. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R024794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sinal CJ, Tohkin M, Miyata M, Ward JM, Lambert G, Gonzalez FJ. Targeted disruption of the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR impairs bile acid and lipid homeostasis. Cell. 2000;102:731–744. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gardmo C, Tamburro A, Modica S, Moschetta A. Proteomics for the discovery of nuclear bile acid receptor FXR targets. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812:836–841. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kemper JK. Regulation of FXR transcriptional activity in health and disease: Emerging roles of FXR cofactors and post-translational modifications. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812:842–850. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lu Y, Ma Z, Zhang Z, et al. Yin Yang 1 promotes hepatic steatosis through repression of farnesoid X receptor in obese mice. Gut. 2014;63:170–178. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yang F, Huang X, Yi T, Yen Y, Moore DD, Huang W. Spontaneous development of liver tumors in the absence of the bile acid receptor farnesoid X receptor. Cancer Res. 2007;67:863–867. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Modica S, Murzilli S, Salvatore L, Schmidt DR, Moschetta A. Nuclear bile acid receptor FXR protects against intestinal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9589–9594. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kim I, Morimura K, Shah Y, Yang Q, Ward JM, Gonzalez FJ. Spontaneous hepatocarcinogenesis in farnesoid X receptor-null mice. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28:940–946. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen Y, Song X, Valanejad L, et al. Bile salt export pump is dysregulated with altered farnesoid X receptor isoform expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2013;57:1530–1541. doi: 10.1002/hep.26187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Duran-Sandoval D, Mautino G, Martin G, et al. Glucose regulates the expression of the farnesoid X receptor in liver. Diabetes. 2004;53:890–898. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.4.890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim MS, Shigenaga J, Moser A, Feingold K, Grunfeld C. Repression of farnesoid X receptor during the acute phase response. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:8988–8995. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212633200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang Y, Gong W, Dai S, et al. Downregulation of human farnesoid X receptor by miR-421 promotes proliferation and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2012;10:516–522. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ohno T, Shirakami Y, Shimizu M, et al. Synergistic growth inhibition of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells by acyclic retinoid and GW4064, a farnesoid X receptor ligand. Cancer Lett. 2012;323:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.He N, Park K, Zhang Y, Huang J, Lu S, Wang L. Epigenetic inhibition of nuclear receptor small heterodimer partner is associated with and regulates hepatocellular carcinoma growth. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:793–802. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang Y, Xu P, Park K, Choi Y, Moore DD, Wang L. Orphan receptor small heterodimer partner suppresses tumorigenesis by modulating cyclin D1 expression and cellular proliferation. Hepatology. 2008;48:289–298. doi: 10.1002/hep.22342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hollander MC, Blumenthal GM, Dennis PA. PTEN loss in the continuum of common cancers, rare syndromes and mouse models. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:289–301. doi: 10.1038/nrc3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Warde N. Prostate cancer: loss of PTEN promotes progression of prostate cancer in an androgen-independent manner. Nat Rev Urol. 2011;8:412. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]