Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 2014 Sep;104(9):1728–1733. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301952

Older Jail Inmates and Community Acute Care Use

Anna H Chodos 1, Cyrus Ahalt 1, Irena Stijacic Cenzer 1, Janet Myers 1, Joe Goldenson 1, Brie A Williams 1,
PMCID: PMC4151907  PMID: 25033146

Abstract

Objectives. We examined older jail inmates’ predetainment acute care use (emergency department or hospitalization in the 3 months before arrest) and their plans for using acute care after release.

Methods. We performed a cross-sectional study of 247 jail inmates aged 55 years or older assessing sociodemographic characteristics, health, and geriatric conditions associated with predetainment and anticipated postrelease acute care use.

Results. We found that 52% of older inmates reported predetainment acute care use and 47% planned to use the emergency department after release. In modified Poisson regression, homelessness was independently associated with predetainment use (relative risk = 1.42; 95% confidence interval = 1.10, 1.83) and having a primary care provider was inversely associated with planned use (relative risk = 0.69; 95% confidence interval = 0.53, 0.89).

Conclusions. The Affordable Care Act has expanded Medicaid eligibility to all persons leaving jail in an effort to decrease postrelease acute care use in this high-risk population. Jail-to-community transitional care models that address the health, geriatric, and social factors prevalent in older adults leaving jail, and that focus on linkages to housing and primary care, are needed to enhance the impact of the act on acute care use for this population.


Jail has become a critical site for linking medically vulnerable older adults to community health care. Approximately 12 million Americans pass through jails each year and nearly all return to the community within 6 months where many struggle to access nonemergency medical care. Between 1996 and 2008 the number of “older” or “geriatric” inmates (aged 55 years or older) increased 278% compared with a 53% growth in the overall jail population.1,2 Now, approximately 550 000 older adults spend time in jail each year, comprising 10% of all inmates. Yet little is known about their health care and social service needs.

Reducing acute care use (hospitalizations and emergency department [ED] use) and improving insurance access for former inmates is a priority in the Affordable Care Act (ACA).3 Although most inmates are without health insurance,4 those with insurance demonstrate reduced recidivism and better access to mental health and substance abuse treatment when released.5–7 The ACA expands Medicaid eligibility for low-income adults and allows eligible inmates to apply for coverage while in jail.3,8 As most persons passing through jails will be eligible for Medicaid in states participating in the expansion, an estimated 4 to 6 million jail inmates will gain new coverage by the end of 2014 through outreach and patient navigator assistance.9

For community-dwelling older adults, health and social factors beyond insurance drive community acute care use, such as functional impairment, uncontrolled symptoms, and housing instability.10–12 This may also be true for older former inmates, many of whom experience “accelerated aging” because of high rates of disability and chronic disease at relatively young ages.13 Therefore, we conducted a study of older jail inmates to describe predetainment acute care use and anticipated plans for using acute care after release, and to assess the factors associated with use.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study with 247 inmates aged 55 years or older in the San Francisco County Jail in California between May 15 and November 15, 2012. Eligibility included speaking English, Spanish, or Cantonese; not posing a safety risk (according to the Sheriff’s deputy, regardless of housing unit); and answering all questions about acute care use. We obtained research consent by using a teach-to-goal method.14 Native-speaking interviewers read questionnaires to participants, and staff abstracted medical records. Consistent with federal regulations governing prisoner research,15 permitted practice in California,16 and relevant ethical considerations,17 we deposited $10 in participants’ jail accounts as compensation for their time.

Measures

Acute care use.

We asked: “In the 3 months before jail, did you ever visit a hospital emergency room?” and “In the 3 months before jail, did you ever stay overnight in a hospital?” We defined anticipated postrelease acute care use as responding to “after you are released from jail, where will you go for health care?” with “emergency room,” “hospital,” or “jail.” Few inmates receive discharge planning in jail and few of our study participants would have received it before our interviews, which were conducted soon after incarceration.

Sociodemographics and health conditions.

We assessed sociodemographics including annual income (categorized as ≤ $15 000 vs > $15 000 based on the new ACA cut-off for Medicaid minimum income eligibility criteria of 133% of the federal poverty level in 20133). We assessed health conditions through a combination of chart review and self-report with previously validated questions from the Health and Retirement Study.18 We identified serious mental illness through the same method by using the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ definition of serious mental illness (major depressive, mania, or psychotic disorder).19 Self-report is well-validated in older adults20,21 including with vulnerable populations such as the homeless.22 We conducted medical chart review of all participants who consented (93%) to increase detection of diagnoses for those participants who do not know their medical conditions.

Geriatric conditions.

We assessed the following geriatric conditions commonly associated with acute care use: persistent symptoms (pain and shortness of breath),23,24 functional impairment, and recent falls.10,12,25 Functional impairment included any self-reported activity of daily living difficulty (bathing, feeding, dressing, transferring, or toileting)26,27 or a mobility impairment (needing an assistive device [e.g., cane, walker] to help with daily activities)28 in the 2 weeks before detainment.

Social and behavioral health factors.

We assessed homelessness, medication insecurity and food insecurity.29–31 In addition, we assessed illicit drug use through jail medical record documentation of current use or a positive screen on a Drug Abuse Screening Test item.32 We defined problem alcohol use as medical record documentation of current alcohol use disorder or a positive screen on the 3-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C.33

Statistical Analysis

We used descriptive statistics to describe participant characteristics and the prevalence of predetainment acute care use and anticipated acute care use. We assessed associations with acute care use with χ2 analyses. All variables for which P < .2 in the bivariable analyses were included in the multivariable modified Poisson regression models.

We conducted analyses by using Stata version 12 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). We managed study data by using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap, version 5.9.7, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN) application.34

RESULTS

Of 319 adults aged 55 years or older in jail over the study period, 23 (7%) did not meet inclusion criteria: 7 (2%) did not speak English, Spanish, or Cantonese, and 16 (5%) were deemed a safety risk by the Sheriff’s department. Of the remaining 296, 44 (15%) declined and 252 (85%) were enrolled. Two (< 1%) withdrew and 3 (1%) did not answer the acute care use questions, resulting in a sample of 247. Overall, 230 (93%) consented to medical chart review. Those who did not meet inclusion criteria, declined to participate, or declined permission for medical chart review did not differ in age from participants.

Most participants were male (95%) and Black (63%) and the mean age was 59 years (range = 55–75 years; Table 1). More than half (52%) reported using acute care within 3 months of detainment. Of these, 69 (54%) used ED services and were not hospitalized, 50 (39%) used ED services and were hospitalized, and 9 (7%) were hospitalized without ED use. Nearly as many (47%) anticipated using acute care after release (Table 1). Predetainment users were no more likely to anticipate using acute care after release than nonusers (50% vs 43%; P = .26; Table 2). Overall, 73% used acute care within 3 months of detainment or anticipated using it after release.

TABLE 1—

Predetainment Acute Care Use and Plans to Use Acute Care After Release From Jail According to Participant Characteristics Among 247 Inmates Aged 55 Years or Older in the San Francisco County Jail: California, 2012

Characteristic All Participants (n = 247), No. (%) or Mean (Range) No Predetainment Acute Care Usea (n = 119; 48%), No. (%) or Mean (Range) Predetainment Acute Care Use (n = 128; 52%), No. (%) or Mean (Range) P No Anticipated Acute Care Useb (n = 132; 53%), No. (%) or Mean (Range) Anticipated Acute Care Use (n = 115; 47%), No. (%) or Mean (Range) P
Age, yc 59 (55–75) 59 (55–75) 59 (55–70) .91 60 (55–75) 59 (55–68) .13
Other sociodemographics
Age 55–64 y 221 (90) 106 (89) 115 (90) .84 115 (87) 106 (92) .2
Race/ethnicity
 Black 155 (63) 74 (62) 81 (63) .66 87 (66) 68 (59) .73
 White, non-Latino 50 (20) 21 (18) 29 (23) 24 (18) 26 (23)
 Latino 22 (9) 12 (10) 10 (8) 12 (9) 10 (9)
 Asian/Pacific Islander 14 (6) 8 (7) 6 (5) 7 (5) 7 (6)
Female 12 (5) 4 (3) 8 (6) .38 9 (7) 3 (3) .15
Annual income < $15 000 197 (80) 93 (78) 109 (85) .15 107 (81) 95 (83) .91
High school, GED, or more 183 (74) 91 (76) 92 (72) .41 97 (73) 86 (75) .82
Health conditionsd
Self-rated health status
 Poor or fair 129 (52) 53 (44) 77 (60) 71 (53) 59 (51)
 Good, very good, or excellent 117 (48) 66 (56) 51 (40) .016 61 (47) 56 (49) .738
Hypertension 154 (62) 76 (64) 80 (62) .83 92 (70) 63 (55) .01
Diabetes 42 (17) 22 (18) 20 (16) .55 25 (19) 17 (15) .39
Heart attack or coronary disease 49 (20) 18 (15) 31 (24) .07 30 (23) 19 (17) .22
Congestive heart failure 17 (7) 4 (3) 13 (10) .04 12 (9) 5 (4) .11
Stroke 25 (10) 10 (8) 15 (12) .39 16 (12) 9 (8) .26
Cancere 18 (7) 5 (4) 13 (10) .07 9 (7) 9 (8) .76
Chronic lung disease 39 (16) 18 (15) 21 (17) .76 25 (19) 14 (12) .14
HIV/AIDS 13 (5) 5 (4) 8 (6) .46 4 (3) 9 (8) .15
Hepatitis C 121 (49) 53 (45) 69 (54) .18 67 (51) 55 (48) .64
Alzheimer’s, dementia, senilityf 24 (10) 8 (7) 16 (13) .12 16 (12) 8 (7) .18
Arthritis or rheumatism 124 (50) 61 (51) 63 (50) .13 65 (49) 60 (52) .69
≥ 3 chronic conditions 116 (47) 50 (42) 66 (52) .13 68 (52) 48 (42) .13
Serious mental illnessg 118 (48) 50 (42) 75 (59) .07 60 (46) 58 (50) .47
Geriatric conditions
 Persistent pain 124 (50) 51 (43) 74 (57) .02 64 (48) 61 (53) .52
 Persistent shortness of breathh 37 (15) 13 (11) 25 (19) .08 24 (18) 13 (12) .15
 Functional impairmenti 110 (45) 34 (29) 51 (40) .06 47 (36) 38 (33) .67
 Recent fall(s)j 75 (30) 26 (22) 49 (39) < .01 42 (32) 33 (29) .6
Social and behavioral health factors
Tobacco usek 162 (66) 73 (62) 89 (70) .18 86 (66) 76 (67) .87
Drug usel 134 (54) 66 (55) 70 (54) .71 76 (58) 58 (50) .26
Problem alcohol usem 148 (60) 70 (59) 79 (61) .68 87 (66) 62 (54) .05
Homelessnessn 112 (45) 42 (36) 71 (55) < .01 61 (46) 52 (45) .17
Medication insecurityo 100 (40) 39 (33) 64 (50) .01 55 (41) 49 (42) .88
Food insecurityo 152 (62) 68 (57) 89 (70) .04 79 (60) 79 (68) .17
Acute care use
Has primary care provider 174 (70) 89 (70) 85 (71) .74 104 (79) 70 (61) < .01
Recent acute care use 128 (52) . . . . . . . . . 64 (48) 64 (56) .26
Anticipated acute care postrelease 115 (47) 64 (54) 64 (50) .42 . . . . . . . . .

Note. GED = general equivalency diploma.

a

We defined recent acute care use as answering “yes” to the questions “In the 3 months before jail, did you ever visit a hospital emergency room?” or “In the 3 months before jail, did you ever stay overnight in a hospital?”

b

We defined plans for acute care use after release as answering “emergency room,” “hospital,” named a specific emergency room, or replied “I get my health care in the jail” to the question “after you are released from jail, where will you go for health care?”

c

Age analyzed with t tests. All other factors analyzed with χ2 tests.

d

Health conditions determined through self-report or documentation in the jail medical record.

e

Excluding minor skin cancers.

f

Determined through documentation in the jail medical record or by answering “yes” to the following question from the Health and Retirement Survey18: “Do you have or have you ever been told by a medical professional that you have Alzheimer’s, dementia, or senility?”

g

Serious mental illness includes any major depressive, manic, or psychotic disorder and was determined through self-report or documentation in the jail medical record.19

h

Persistent defined as a symptom described as “moderate or severe” and occurring “constantly or frequently.”23,24

i

Functional impairment defined as having difficulty with 1 or more activities of daily living (bathing, eating, transferring, toileting, or dressing)27 or needing a cane, wheelchair, walker, or other aid to help with daily activities.

j

Defined as any self-reported fall to the ground within the past 3 months.25

k

Tobacco use defined as answering “yes” to “In the week before you came to jail, did you smoke cigarettes?”

l

Drug use defined as documentation of current drug use in the jail medical record or answering “no” to “In the last year, could you get through the week without using drugs?”32

m

Problem alcohol use defined as documentation of current alcohol use disorder in jail medical record or a positive screen on the validated, 3-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C.33

n

Homelessness defined as needing to spend 1 or more nights outside or in a homeless shelter in the 30 days before jail.29

o

Medication and food insecurity defined as answering “yes” to “Was there a time in the last year when you did not have enough money for medications or food?”31

TABLE 2—

Factors Independently Associated With Recent Acute Care Use and Anticipated Acute Care Use After Release Among 247 Inmates Aged 55 Years or Older in the San Francisco County Jail: California, 2012

Factors Predetainment Acute Care Use, Adjusted RR (95% CI) Planning to Use Acute Care After Release, Adjusted RR (95% CI)
Age 1.01 (0.97, 1.04) 0.99 (0.95, 1.02)
Female gender . . . 0.52 (0.20, 1.34)
Smoking 1.19 (0.89, 1.60) . . .
Very poor or poor self-rated health status 0.88 (0.65, 1.19) . . .
Hypertension . . . 0.71 (0.55, 0.93)
Any heart disease 1.23 (0.95, 1.59) 0.80 (0.53, 1.21)
Cancer 1.28 (0.92, 1.77) . . .
Chronic lung disease . . . 0.70 (0.4, 1.23)
HIV . . . 1.59 (1.03, 2.47)
Hepatitis C 0.96 (0.74, 1.24) . . .
Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, senility, or serious memory problem 1.20 (0.86, 1.67) 0.69 (0.32, 1.48)
Serious mental illness 1.10 (0.85, 1.42) . . .
Functional impairment 0.93 (0.69, 1.26) . . .
Persistent pain 1.12 (0.83, 1.51) . . .
Persistent shortness of breath 0.98 (0.71, 1.34) 1.06 (0.61, 1.85)
Recent fall(s) 1.19 (0.88, 1.6) . . .
Problem alcohol use . . . 0.72 (0.55, 0.94)
Homelessness 1.42 (1.10, 1.83) 0.90 (0.69, 1.18)
Has primary care provider . . . 0.69 (0.53, 0.89)

Note. CI = confidence interval; RR = relative risk.

Characteristics According to Acute Care Use

Participants reporting predetainment acute care use were more likely to have congestive heart failure (10% vs 3%; P = .04), poor or fair self-rated health (60% vs 45%; P = .03), persistent pain (57% vs 43%; P = .02), and falls (39% vs 22%; P = .01). Social factors associated with predetainment acute care use included homelessness (55% vs 36%; P < .01), medication insecurity (50% vs 33%; P = .01), and food insecurity (70% vs 57%; P = .04; Table 1).

Participants who anticipated using acute care after release were less likely to have a primary care provider (61% vs 79%; P < .01), problem alcohol use (54% vs 66%; P = .05), or hypertension (55% vs 70%; P = .01; Table 1).

Independent Predictors of Acute Care Use

After multivariable adjustment, homelessness remained independently associated with predetainment acute care use (relative risk [RR] = 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10, 1.83), and having a primary care provider was associated with a 31% decreased risk of anticipated acute care use (RR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.53, 0.89; Table 2).

Other factors inversely associated with anticipated use were hypertension (RR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.55, 0.93) and problem alcohol use (RR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.55, 0.94). Having HIV was associated with a 59% increased risk of anticipated acute care after release (RR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.03, 2.47).

DISCUSSION

More than half of older jail inmates reported using acute care in the 3 months before jail, and nearly half anticipated using acute care after release. Overall, the majority (73%) reported using acute care before jail or anticipating use of acute care after release. Most participants in this study were between the ages of 55 and 64 years, and therefore did not meet the Medicare age requirements, and most reported an annual income that would make them eligible for Medicaid under the ACA. Moreover, identifying a primary care provider was associated with a reduced risk of planning to use acute care after release. These findings suggest that older jail inmates may benefit from the ACA’s effort to facilitate access to primary care for former jail inmates by enrolling them in Medicaid through evidence-based strategies such as patient navigation.7,9

This study also suggests that factors beyond access to insurance likely lead to acute care use in this medically complex population. Consistent with the “accelerated aging” of incarcerated populations,13 participants in this study with an average age of 59 years reported poor or fair health (52%), chronic lung disease (16%), and recent falls (30%) at rates similar to those reported in community-based lower-income older adults with an average age of 71.7 years (51% poor or fair health, 23% lung disease, and 22% recent fall).35 Three-month ED use (48%) in this study was similar to rates found in community-dwelling persons approaching the end of life (51%)36 and far exceeded the 19.1% 1-year ED use found in nationally representative community dwellers with a similar average age (59.6 years).22

Expanded Medicaid enrollment for jail inmates may not sufficiently reduce their postrelease acute care use. Although this study’s participants had access to Healthy San Francisco, a program that extends community clinic care access to all San Franciscans regardless of insurance, there remained a high rate of predetainment acute care use. Reasons for high acute care utilization could include poor understanding of the benefits of primary care because of low health literacy common in incarcerated and older populations, a struggle to access primary care because of functional impairments (45% in this study), or seeking acute care for pressing social service or behavioral health needs. In this study, nearly half (46%) of those who reported recent acute care use visited an ED without requiring hospitalization, suggesting the possibility of low medical acuity. In addition, homelessness remained the primary factor independently associated with acute care use in multivariable analyses. Taken together, these findings suggest that older jail inmates may require access to social service programs in addition to insurance if acute care utilization rates are to be reduced.

The cross-sectional design limited our ability to determine the causes of acute care use or anticipated acute care use after release, though in our analysis we included the health, geriatric, and social factors that drive acute care use in community-dwelling older adults.10–12,37 Acute care use was based on self-report. However, self-reported acute care use is validated in older adults and has been used to describe preincarceration acute care use in jail inmates.38–40 Important next steps include determining rates and appropriateness of acute care use longitudinally, understanding the association between plans to use acute care and actual use, and identifying the causes of acute care use in diverse populations of former jail inmates.

This study was conducted in 1 urban jail system, which could limit its generalizability to other settings. However, as jail populations are aging nationwide and acute care use in this population has not been described, this study constitutes a critical first step to quantifying the high rates of acute care use in older inmates and the complex factors associated with that use.

As criminal justice populations age, jails increasingly represent critical health care delivery sites where medically vulnerable older adults can be reached. New ACA provisions address this opportunity by specifically targeting jail inmates for insurance enrollment upon their release. Our findings support previous studies showing that interventions that extend beyond access to insurance are also an important means of improving care for vulnerable populations. These include primary care homes, patient navigation for vulnerable populations, and case management–based transitional care programs.41–43 As the number of older jail inmates grows, ACA programs used to enhance insurance enrollment, such as patient navigation, should also be applied to directly facilitate use of nonacute care following release.

Acknowledgments

B. A. Williams was supported in part by the National Institute of Aging (K23AG033102), The Jacob and Valeria Langeloth Foundation, UCSF Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, the National Palliative Care Research Center, and The UCSF Program for the Aging Century. A. H. Chodos was supported by grant T32 AG000212-21 from the National Institute on Aging at the National Institutes of Health.

This work was presented as a poster presentation at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the Society for General Internal Medicine.

Note. The National Institute of Aging, The Jacob and Valeria Langeloth Foundation, UCSF Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, the National Palliative Care Research Center, and The UCSF Program for the Aging Century had no role in the preparation, review, or approval of the article. B. A. Williams is also an employee of the San Francisco VA Medical Center. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the San Francisco VA Medical Center of the City and County of San Francisco; nor does mention of the San Francisco Department of Public Health imply its endorsement. One author of this article has served as an expert witness and as a court consultant in legal cases related to conditions of confinement for prisoners in an effort to improve health care in prisons and jails. These relationships have included the American Civil Liberties Union, the Disability Rights Legal Center, Hunton and Williams LLP, Holland and Knight LLP, The University of Denver Student Law Office, and The Office of the Independent Medical Monitor, MI. These relationships had no role in the decision to write this article and did not influence the preparation, review, or approval of the article.

Human Participant Protection

The study was approved by the Committee on Human Research at the Human Research Protection Program at the University of California, San Francisco.

References

  • 1.Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; Profile of jail inmates 2002. Available at: http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=1118. Accessed September 17, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beck AJ, Berzofsky M. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2010. Sexual victimization in prison and jails reported by inmates, 2008–2009. 91. Table 6. NCJ 231169. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Focus on health reform: summary of new health reform law. Available at: http://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/8061-021.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2013.
  • 4.Wang EA, White MC, Jamison R, Goldenson J, Estes M, Tulsky JP. Discharge planning and continuity of health care: findings from the San Francisco County Jail. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(12):2182–2184. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.119669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mancuso D, Felver B. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Research and Data Analysis Division; 2010. Health care reform, Medicaid expansion and access to alcohol/drug treatment: opportunities for disability prevention. Available at: http://www.dshs.wa.gov/pdf/ms/rda/research/4/84.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Morrissey JP, Cuddeback GS, Cuellar AE, Steadman HJ. The role of Medicaid enrollment and outpatient service use in jail recidivism among persons with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58(6):794–801. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.6.794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McDonnell M, Brookes L, Lurigio A, Baille D. Realizing the potential for national health care reform to reduce criminal justice expenditures and recidivism among jail populations. Community Oriented Correctional Health Services. Issue Paper; 2011. Available at: http://www.cochs.org/files/CHJ%20Final.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2014.
  • 8.Cardwell A. County Jails and the Affordable Care Act: Enrolling Eligible Individuals in Health Coverage. Washington, DC: National Association of Counties; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Regenstein M, Christie-Maples J. Washington, DC: Department of Health Policy, School of Public Health and Health Services, George Washington University; 2012. Medicaid coverage for individuals in jail pending disposition: opportunities for improved health and health care at lower costs. Available at: http://www.cochs.org/files/GWU/MedicaidCoverage.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gruneir A, Silver MJ, Rochon PA. Emergency department use by older adults: a literature review on trends, appropriateness, and consequences of unmet health care needs. Med Care Res Rev. 2011;68(2):131–155. doi: 10.1177/1077558710379422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McCusker J, Karp I, Cardin S, Durand P, Morin J. Determinants of emergency department visits by older adults: a systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(12):1362–1370. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aminzadeh F, Dalziel WB. Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39(3):238–247. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.121523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Williams BA, Goodwin JS, Baillargeon J, Ahalt C, Walter LC. Addressing the aging crisis in US criminal justice health care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(6):1150–1156. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03962.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sudore RL, Landefeld CS, Williams BA, Barnes DE, Lindquist K, Schillinger D. Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(8):867–873. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00535.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.45 CFR 46 C §46.305 (2009) Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html#subpartc. Accessed June 26, 2013.
  • 16.Smoyer AB, Blankenship KM, Belt B. Compensation for incarcerated research participants: diverse state policies suggest a new research agenda. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(10):1746–1752. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.148726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hanson RK, Letourneau EJ, Olver ME, Miner MH. Incentives for offender research participation are both ethical and practical. Crim Justice Behav. 2012;11(39):1391–1404. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services. Growing Older in America. The Health and Retirement Study. 2012 Participant Lifestyle Questionnaire. Available at: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/modules/meta/2012/core/qnaire/online/HRS2012_SAQ_Final.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2013.
  • 19.James DJ, Glaze LE. Washington DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2006. Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. NCJ 213600. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Covinsky KE, Palmer RM, Counsell SR, Pine ZM, Walter LC, Chren MM. Functional status before hospitalization in acutely ill older adults: validity and clinical importance of retrospective reports. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(2):164–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03907.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bush TL, Miller SR, Golden AL, Hale WE. Self-report and medical record report agreement of selected medical conditions in the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(11):1554–1556. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.11.1554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brown RT, Kiely DK, Bharel M, Mitchell SL. Geriatric syndromes in older homeless adults. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(1):16–22. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1848-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB et al. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(9):1326–1336. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)90182-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smith AK, Cenzer IS, Knight SJ et al. The epidemiology of pain during the last 2 years of life. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(9):563–569. doi: 10.1059/0003-4819-153-9-201011020-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tinetti ME. Clinical practice. Preventing falls in elderly persons. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(1):42–49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp020719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–919. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stewart AL, Ware JE, Brook RH. Advances in the measurement of functional status: construction of aggregate indexes. Med Care. 1981;19(5):473–488. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198105000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing: Defining “homeless.” 24 CFR Parts 91, 582, and 283 (Docket no. FR-5333-F-02) RIN 2506-AC26 (2010).
  • 30.Stewart AL, Thrasher AD, Goldberg J, Shea JA. A framework for understanding modifications to measures for diverse populations. J Aging Health. 2012;24(6):992–1017. doi: 10.1177/0898264312440321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.University of California, San Francisco, Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, Measurement and Methods Core. Recommended sociodemographic measures. Available at: http://dgim.ucsf.edu/cadc/mm/msesenglish.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2013.
  • 32.Skinner HA. The drug abuse screening test. Addict Behav. 1982;7(4):363–371. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90005-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(16):1789–1795. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Counsell SR, Callahan CM, Clark DO et al. Geriatric care management for low-income seniors: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298(22):2623–2633. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Smith AK, McCarthy E, Weber E et al. Half of older Americans seen in emergency department in last month of life; most admitted to hospital, and many die there. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31(6):1277–1285. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shah MN, Glushak C, Karrison TG et al. Predictors of emergency medical services utilization by elders. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(1):52–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01976.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pacala JT, Boult C, Boult L. Predictive validity of a questionnaire that identifies older persons at risk for hospital admission. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43(4):374–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb05810.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Reuben DB, Keeler E, Seeman TE, Sewall A, Hirsch SH, Guralnik JM. Development of a method to identify seniors at high risk for high hospital utilization. Med Care. 2002;40(9):782–793. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Conklin TJ, Lincoln T, Tuthill RW. Self-reported health and prior health behaviors of newly admitted correctional inmates. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(12):1939–1941. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.12.1939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Friedberg MW, Coltin KL, Safran DG, Dresser M, Schneider EC. Medical home capabilities of primary care practices that serve sociodemographically vulnerable neighborhoods. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(11):938–944. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Myers J, Zack B, Kramer K, Gardner M, Rucobo G, Costa-Taylor S. Get Connected: an HIV prevention case management program for men and women leaving California prisons. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(10):1682–1684. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.055947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang EA, Hong CS, Shavit S, Sanders R, Kessell E, Kushel MB. Engaging individuals recently released from prison into primary care: a randomized trial. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(9):e22–e29. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES