Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1975 Jun;11(6):1170–1173. doi: 10.1128/iai.11.6.1170-1173.1975

Effect of Cell Dose and Dose of Infectious Agent on Expression of Protection Against Listeria monocytogenes and Ectromelia Virus in Cell Transfer Models

R M Zinkernagel 1, T Pang 1, R V Blanden 1
PMCID: PMC415195  PMID: 806519

Abstract

Two parameters (immune cell dose and dose of infectious agent) influencing the expression of protection by transferred immune spleen cells in Listeria monocytogenes and ectromelia virus infection in mice were investigated. First, when recipient mice were infected with a constant dose of ectromelia virus, a linear relationship between log10 cells transferred and the protection obtained expressed as log10 decrease in virus plaque-forming units per spleen was obtained, as has been described previously for the Listeria system. Second, the detectable protection was greatly affected by the number of viable bacteria or virus plaque-forming units relative to the number of transferred cells. An otherwise very effective number of transferred immune cells became ineffective when too great a dose of infection was used. Mouse strain differences could also have influenced the results. The impact of these and other parameters on the experimental outcome and its interpretation are discussed.

Full text

PDF
1170

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blanden R. V., Langman R. E. Cell-mediated immunity to bacterial infection in the mouse. Thymus-derived cells as effectors of acquired resistance to Listeria monocytogenes. Scand J Immunol. 1972;1(4):379–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1972.tb03304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blanden R. V. Mechanisms of recovery from a generalized viral infection: mousepox. I. The effects of anti-thymocyte serum. J Exp Med. 1970 Nov;132(5):1035–1054. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.5.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blanden R. V. Mechanisms of recovery from a generalized viral infection: mousepox. II. Passive transfer of recovery mechanisms with immune lymphoid cells. J Exp Med. 1971 May 1;133(5):1074–1089. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.5.1074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doherty P. C., Zinkernagel R. M. T-cell-mediated immunopathology in viral infections. Transplant Rev. 1974;19(0):89–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1974.tb00129.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MACKANESS G. B. Cellular resistance to infection. J Exp Med. 1962 Sep 1;116:381–406. doi: 10.1084/jem.116.3.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mackaness G. B. The influence of immunologically committed lymphoid cells on macrophage activity in vivo. J Exp Med. 1969 May 1;129(5):973–992. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.5.973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zinkernagel R. M., Blanden R. V., Langman R. E. Early appearance of sensitized lymphocytes in mice infected with Listeria monocytogenes. J Immunol. 1974 Feb;112(2):496–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zinkernagel R. M. Restriction by H-2 gene complex of transfer of cell-mediated immunity to Listeria monocytogenes. Nature. 1974 Sep 20;251(5472):230–233. doi: 10.1038/251230a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES