Skip to main content
PMC home page
International Journal of Molecular Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Medicine
. 2014 Aug 8;34(4):967–974. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1887

Stomach antral endocrine cells in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

MAGDY EL-SALHY 1,2,3,✉, ODD HELGE GILJA 2,3,4, JAN GUNNAR HATLEBAKK 2,3, TRYGVE HAUSKEN 2,3,4
PMCID: PMC4152137  PMID: 25110039

Abstract

To the best of our knowledge, stomach antral endocrine cells have not previously been investigated in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Thus, in the present study, 76 patients with IBS were examined (designated as IBS-total). Diarrhoea was the predominant symptom in 26 of these patients (IBS-D), while in 21 patients, the predominant symptoms were both diarrhoea and constipation (IBS-M) and in 29 patients the predominant symptom was constipation (IBS-C). Forty-three healthy subjects were enrolled as the controls. Stomach antral biopsy samples obtained from all of the subjects were immunostained using the avidin-biotin-complex method for serotonin, gastrin, somatostatin and serotonin transporter (SERT). The immunopositive cell densities and immunoreactivity intensities were determined by computer-aided image analysis. The density of the serotonin-immunoreactive cells was significantly decreased in the IBS-M patients and increased in the IBS-C patients relative to the controls. The immunoreactivity intensity did not differ significantly between the controls and IBS-total. The density of the gastrin-immunoreactive cells was significantly greater in the IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C patients than in the controls. The immunoreactivity intensity of gastrin was significantly greater in the IBS-D patients than in the controls. The density of the somatostatin-immunoreactive cells cells was significantly lower in the IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C patients than in the controls. The immunoreactivity intensities of both somatostatin and SERT did not differ significantly between the controls and IBS-total. The increase in gastrin cell density and the decrease in somatostatin cell density in all IBS subtypes may cause high levels of gastric secretion, which may in turn contribute to the high incidence of dyspepsia and gastro-oesophageal reflux observed in patients with IBS.

Keywords: computer-aided image analysis, gastrin, immunohistochemistry, serotonin, somatostatin

Introduction

The gastrointestinal tract contains several types of endocrine cells that control and regulate a number of important functions of the gastrointestinal tract, enabling it to perform its main task, the digestion and absorption of ingested nutrients (1–4). These cells are dispersed among the epithelial cells of the mucosa and have specialised microvilli that project into the lumen and function as sensors, responding to luminal stimuli, particularly nutrients, by releasing hormones that target other parts of the digestive system (5–14). There are at least 15 different populations of these cells in the gastrointestinal tract that interact in an integrated manner with each other, with the enteric nervous system, and with afferent and efferent nerve fibres of the central nervous system, in particular the autonomic nervous system (2,4).

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder that considerably reduces the quality of life and is an economic burden to both individual patients and society as a whole due to the direct costs of diagnostic tests and treatments, and the indirect costs of the low productivity of patients with IBS (4). Abnormalities of endocrine cells have been reported in the duodenum, ileum, colon and rectum of patients with IBS (15–28). However, to the best of our knowledge, the antral endocrine cells of the stomach have not been previously investigated. The antrum of the stomach contains 3 types of endocrine cells: serotonin, gastrin and somatostatin cells. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine whether there are any endocrine cell or serotonin transporter (SERT) abnormalities in the antrum of the stomach of patients with IBS.

Materials and methods

Patients and controls

Seventy-six patients with IBS, classified according to the Rome III criteria for IBS as previously described (29,30) were included in this study. Forty patients fulfilled the Rome III criteria for functional dyspepsia as well. These patients comprised 62 females and 14 males with a mean age of 32 years (range, 18–55 years). Diarrhoea was the predominant symptom in 26 of these patients (IBS-D), while in 21 patients, the predominant symptoms were both diarrhoea and constipation (IBS-M) and in 29 patients, the predominant symptom was constipation (IBS-C). All the patients (designated as IBS-total) had experienced their symptoms for many years and were unable to associate the onset of their IBS symptoms with any particular event, particularly gastrointestinal infections. They underwent a complete physical examination and were investigated by way of blood tests to exclude inflammatory, liver, endocrine or any other systemic diseases. Moreover, they underwent a colonoscopy with segmental biopsies, which revealed the presence of a normal terminal ileum, colon and rectum in all cases. None of these patients used proton pump inhibitors in the last 3 months. However, they all tried proton pump inhibitors for short periods of time without relief of symptoms.

Healthy volunteers without any gastrointestinal complaints were recruited as the controls through local announcements at Stord Hospital, Haukeland University Hospital and the University of Bergen, Norway, as well as in the local newspapers. Forty-three healthy subjects were included, of whom 15 were residents of Stord and 28 were students or hospital employees. They comprised 32 females and 11 males with a mean age of 40 years (range, 20–58 years).

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics West, Bergen, Norway. All subjects provided both oral and written consent prior to participation.

Symptoms and quality of life assessments

The patients were asked to complete the following questionnaires: Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire, the Short-Form (SF) Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI) questionnaire and the Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality Of Life (IBS-QOL) questionnaire. The control subjects were asked to complete the SF-NDI questionnaire. The Birmingham IBS symptom score questionnaire is a disease-specific score used to measure the symptoms of patients with IBS. It has been developed to be suitable for self-completion and has been found to be acceptable by patients. Its dimensions have good reliability, external validity and sensitivity (31). The questionnaire comprises 11 questions based on the frequency of IBS-related symptoms. Each question has a standard response scale with the symptoms all being measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (‘none of the time’) to 5 (‘all of the time’). There are 3 underlying dimensions: pain (3 items), diarrhoea (5 items) and constipation (3 items) (31). SF-NDI was primarily constructed and validated in patients with functional dyspepsia (32). Later, a Norwegian translation of the form was validated and proved to be acceptable by patients with IBS according to the Rome II criteria for IBS (33). The form is a 10-item questionnaire examining the influence of dyspepsia on the health domains in patients, namely tension/anxiety, interference with daily activities, disruption to regular eating/drinking, knowledge towards/control over disease symptoms and interference with work/study, with each subscale containing 2 items. Each item is measured by a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all or not applicable), 2 (a little), 3 (moderately), 4 (quite a lot) to 5 (extremely). Individual items in each subscale are aggregated to obtain a score range from 10 [lowest health-related quality of life (HRQoL) score] to 50 (highest HRQoL score) as per the original calculation formula of the developer. High scores indicate worse functioning or symptoms. The IBS-QOL questionnaire is a 34-item IBS-specific quality of life document concerning physical and psychosocial functioning as a result of IBS (34). This questionnaire includes a 5-point Likert response scale: not at all, slightly, moderately, quite a lot and extremely. IBS-QOL consists of 8 domains: dysphoria, interference with activity, body image, health worry, food avoidance, social reaction, sexual function and impact on relations. The IBS-QOL questionnaire has been validated in patients with IBS (35).

Gastroscopy, histopathology and immunohistochemistry

Both the patients and controls underwent a standard gastroscopy, during which 5 biopsy samples were taken from the antrum from the area around the pyloric sphincter. Two biopsy samples were used in a rapid urease test for Helicobacter pylori (HelicotecUT Plus; Strong Biotech, Taipei, Taiwan). The remaining biopsy samples were fixed overnight in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin and cut into 5-μm-thick sections. The sections were stained with haematoxylin-eosin, and immunostained using the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) method with a Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). The primary antibodies used were monoclonal mouse anti-human serotonin (clone 5HT-H209, code M0758; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), polyclonal rabbit anti-human gastrin-17 (code IR519; Dako), polyclonal rabbit anti-synthetic cyclic (1–14) somatostatin (code A0566; Dako) and monoclonal mouse anti-synthetic peptide from human SERT (code ab136607; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The sections were incubated at room temperature for 2 h with all primary antibodies diluted to 1:100, apart from the antibody against gastrin, which was supplied in a ready-to-use form. The sections were then washed in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) and incubated with biotinylated swine anti-mouse IgG (in the case of monoclonal antibodies) or goat anti-rabbit IgG (in the case of polyclonal antibodies), both diluted to 1:200, for 30 min at room temperature. After washing the slides in PBS buffer, the sections were incubated for 30 min with peroxidase-labelled ABC diluted to 1:100, and then immersed in 3,3′-diaminobenzidine peroxidase substrate (Vector Laboratories), followed by counterstaining with haematoxylin.

Computerised image analysis

A microscope (type BX 43; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with built-in Koehler illumination for transmitted light, a light-intensity manager switch, a high-colour-reproductivity LED light source, a 6 V/30 W halogen bulb and a DP26 Olympus camera was used for morphometric analysis. This microscope was linked to a computer with Olympus cellSens imaging software (version 1.7). The number of immunoreactive cells, the area of epithelial cells and the immunoreactivity intensity were measured. The number of immunoreactive cells in each field was counted manually by pointing and clicking the computer mouse, and the areas of the epithelial cells were drawn manually using the computer mouse. The areas considered for quantification were those near to the muscularis mucosa. The immunoreactivity intensity in each field was measured using an automatic threshold setting. A ×40 objective was used, for which each frame (field) on the monitor represented a tissue area of 0.035 mm2. Measurements were made in 10 randomly selected fields for each individual. The immunostained sections from the IBS patients and the controls were coded and mixed, and measurements were made by the same person (M.E.-S.), who was blind to the identity of the individual to whom the tissue sections belonged. The data from the fields were tabulated, and the cell density of the epithelium (in cells/mm2) and the immunoreactivity intensity were computed.

Statistical analysis

The gender difference and the occurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection between the patients and the controls was examined using Fisher’s exact test. The differences in age and quality of life measured by SF-NDI were calculated using the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. Differences between the control, IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C groups were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test with the Dunn’s post-test. The data are presented as means ± SEM values, and differences with P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients and controls

The gender and age distributions did not differ significantly between the patients and the controls (P=0.196 and P=0.360, respectively). A total of 3 patients and 2 control subjects were positive for Helicobacter pylori infection, as revealed by both the urease test and histopathological examinations. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection did not differ significantly between the patients and the controls (P=1.0). The total score of the Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire was 21.5±0.7. The pain, diarrhoea and constipation dimensions were 7.2±0.4, 6.6±0.4 and 7.2±0.4, respectively. The total score of the SF-NDI questionnaire in the controls was 10.5±0.5 and in the IBS patients it was 26±1.2. There was a significant difference in the reduction of the quality of life according to the SF-NDI questionnaire between the controls and patients with IBS (P<0.0001). The total score of the IBS-QOL questionnaire in the patients with IBS was 72.7±1.5.

Gastroscopy, histopathology and immunohistochemistry

The oesophagus, stomach and duodenum were macroscopically and microscopically normal in both the patients and controls. Immunoreactive cells were found in the stomach antrum of both the patients and the controls, and were either basket- or flask-shaped, sometimes with a long basal cytoplasmic process.

Computerised image analysis

Serotonin

The densities of the serotonin-immunoreactive cells were 135.0±15.0, 141.3±17.9, 163.4±18.2, 7.2±2.3 and 302.3±36.3 cells/mm2 in the control, IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C groups, respectively. The density of the serotonin-immunoreactive cells was significantly lower in the IBS-M group and higher in the IBS-C group compared with the controls (IBS-C, P<0.05; IBS-M, P<0.01 compared to controls; Figs. 1 and 2). The immunoreactivity intensities of serotonin were 125.3±1.5, 127.1±1.3, 128.8±2.1, 122.2±0.4 and 127.8±1.8 in the control, IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C groups, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between any of these groups (P=0.2; Figs. 1 and 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) Densities of serotonin-immunoreactive cells and (B) serotonin immunoreactivity intensities in the stomach antrum of the controls and IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C patients. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. controls. IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-total, all 76 patients with IBS in this study; IBS-D, diarrhoea was the predominant symptom in 26 of these patients; IBS-M, predominant symptoms were both diarrhoea and constipation in 21 patients; IBS-C, predominant symptom was constipation in 29 patients.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Antral serotonin-immunoreactive cells in (A) a control subject, in (B) a patient with IBS-M and in (C) a patient with IBS-C. IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-M, predominant symptoms were both diarrhoea and constipation; IBS-C, predominant symptom was constipation.

Gastrin

The densities of the gastrin-immunoreactive cells were 344.8±38.2, 567.9±38.9, 591.0±67.6, 579.1±54.7 and 612.9±61.1 cells/mm2 in the control, IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C groups, respectively. The densities of gastrin-immunoreactive cells differed significantly between the controls and the IBS-total and the IBS subgroups (P<0.0001). The density of the gastrin-immunoreactive cells differed significantly between the controls and the IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C patients (P<0.01, P<0.05, P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively; Figs. 3 and 4). The immunoreactivity intensities of gastrin were 130.8±0.8, 134.6±1.0, 139.3±1.3, 129.7±0.9 and 133.7±1.7 in the control, IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C groups, respectively, with statistically significant differences between all groups (P=0.0001). The gastrin immunoreactivity intensity was significantly higher in the IBS-D patients than in the controls (P=0.0001; Figs. 3 and 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Densities of gastrin-immunoreactive cells and (B) gastrin immunoreactivity intensities in the stomach antrum of the controls and IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-D patients. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P< 0.0001 vs. controls. IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-total, all 76 patients with IBS in this study; IBS-D, diarrhoea was the predominant symptom in 26 of these patients; IBS-M, predominant symptoms were both diarrhoea and constipation in 21 patients; IBS-C, predominant symptom was constipation in 29 patients.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Gastrin-immunoreactive cells in the stomach antrum of (A) a control subject, (B) a patient with IBS-D and (C) a patient with IBS-C. The immunoreactivity intensity is highest in the patient with IBS-D. IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-D, diarrhoea was the predominant symptom; IBS-C, predominant symptom was constipation.

Somatostatin

The densities of somatostatin-immunoreactive cells were 365.6±55.9, 152.0±14.6, 131.5±18.3, 113.4±21.2 and 207.3±30.5 cells/mm2 in the control, IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C groups, respectively. There was a statistical difference between the controls and the IBS subgroups (P=002). The density of the somatostatin-immunoreactive cells was significantly lower in the IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C patients than in the controls (P<0.01, P<0.01, P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively). There was no significant difference in somatostatin immunoreactivity intensity between the controls (127.1±0.9) and the IBS-total (124.8±0.5), IBS-D (125.0±0.7), IBS-M (125.6±0.6) and IBS-C (124.3±1.0) patients (P=0.369; Figs. 5 and 6).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(A) Somatostatin-immunoreactive cell densities and (B) somatostatin immunoreactivity intensities in IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-D patients. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. controls. IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-total, all 76 patients with IBS in this study; IBS-D, diarrhoea was the predominant symptom in 26 of these patients; IBS-M, predominant symptoms were both diarrhoea and constipation in 21 patients; IBS-C, predominant symptom was constipation in 29 patients.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Stomach antral somatostatin-immunoreactive cells in (A) a control subject and in (B) a patient with IBS-C. IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-C, predominant symptom was constipation.

SERT

The immunoreactivity intensities for SERT were 132.7±1.4, 132.0±0.7, 134.5±0.8, 131.1±1.2 and 130.5±1.4 in the control, IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-C groups, respectively, with no significant differences between any of these groups (P=0.142; Figs. 7 and 8).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

SERT immunoreactivity intensities in IBS-total, IBS-D, IBS-M and IBS-D patients. IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-total, all 76 patients with IBS in this study; IBS-D, diarrhoea was the predominant symptom in 26 of these patients; IBS-M, predominant symptoms were both diarrhoea and constipation in 21 patients; IBS-C, predominant symptom was constipation in 29 patients.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

SERT immunoreactivities in the stomach antral epithelium in (A) a control subject and (B) in a patient with IBS-D. IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-D, diarrhoea was the predominant symptom.

Discussion

The patients with IBS examined in this study had moderate symptoms. These symptoms appeared, however, to considerably reduce their quality of life. Approximately 53% of these patients suffered from functional dyspepsia in addition to IBS.

The present study measured the density of endocrine cells, which are the anatomical units responsible for the production of hormones. Furthermore, the immunoreactivity intensity, which reflects the cellular hormone (secretory granules) content, and hence the summation of the cellular synthesis and release of that particular hormone was detected. The immunoreactivity intensity is a semi-quantative method measured in arbitrary units and is useful for comparing groups immunostained under the same conditions. Modern advances in the illumination used to visualise specimens on microscopes and in computer software have now made it possible to obtain reliable measurements of this parameter. The findings of the present study revealed abnormalities in all the endocrine cell types in the stomach antrum, namely the serotonin-, gastrin- and somatostatin-secreting endocrine cells. In patients with IBS, regardless of the subtype, the density of gastrin-secreting cells increased, while that of the somatostatin-secreting cells decreased.

The density of serotonin-secreting cells differed between the IBS subtypes. Whereas the density of serotonin-secreting cells was unaltered in the IBS-D patients (relative to the controls), it was decreased in IBS-M patients and increased in the IBS-C patients. Serotonin activates the submucosal sensory branch of the enteric nervous system, which conveys sensation from the gut to the central nervous system and stimulates the intrinsic primary afferent neurons that initiate peristaltic reflexes (36–39). The increased density of serotonin-secreting cells in the IBS-C patients may reflect an attempt to increase motility and initiate peristaltic reflexes in the presence of constipation. The increased serotonin levels in IBS-C patients may explain the nausea that these patients experience. However, it is difficult to ascertain why the density of serotonin-secreting cells decreased in the IBS-M patients, but not in the IBS-D patients based on a secondary effect on motility. Genetic abnormalities in SERT have been observed in patients with IBS and it has been reported that SERT levels are decreased in the large intestine and increased in the ileum of patients with IBS (20,40–46). There were no abnormalities in SERT immunoreactivity in the antrum of the patients with IBS included in the present study.

The density of gastrin-immunoreactive cells was higher in the patients with IBS (regardless of subtype) than in the controls. The increased gastrin immunoreactivity intensity in the IBS-D patients may be caused by either increased synthesis or decreased release of the hormone. On the other hand, the density of somatostatin-immunoreactive cells was lower in all the subtypes of IBS than in the healthy controls. Gastrin is the main hormonal stimulant of acid secretion in the stomach (47–51); it stimulates parietal cells both directly and indirectly by releasing histamine from enterochromaffin-like cells (47,48,51,52). Somatostatin inhibits acid secretion directly by acting on parietal cells and indirectly by inhibiting histamine and gastrin secretion (47–51). The present findings of increased gastrin and decreased somatostatin in all IBS subtypes may cause a high level of gastric acid secretion, which may account for the high incidence of dyspepsia and gastro-oesophageal reflux observed in patients with IBS (53–61).

In conclusion, the present study found abnormalities in all 3 endocrine cell types in the stomach antrum of patients with IBS. The nature of the abnormalities in the serotonin-secreting cells differed between the IBS subtypes, while all IBS subtypes had a high density of gastrin-immunoreactive cells and a low density of somatostatin-immunoreactive cells. Since gastrin is the main stimulator and somatostatin is the principal inhibitor of gastric acid secretion, a high gastric secretion is to be expected in patients with IBS. These findings may explain the overlap of IBS with dyspepsia and gastro-oesophageal reflux.

IBS is considered to be a large intestinal disorder and consequently the colonic and rectal endocrine cells have been the subjects of several studies to elucidate a possible role of these cells in the pathophysiology of IBS. Thus, colonic serotonin and PYY cell densities have been found to be low in both IBS-D and IBS-C patients (18). In the rectum of patients with sporadic (non-specific) IBS, the densities of PYY and enteroglucagon cells have been shown to be significantly lower and those of somatostatin-secreting cells to be significantly higher in both IBS-D and IBS-C patients compared to the controls, whereas the density of serotonin-secreting cells in these patients did not differ from that in the healthy controls (19,20). Rectal serotonin and PYY cell densities in post-infectious IBS have been reported to be elevated (22,24,26,62,63). Recently, however, abnormalities in the endocrine cells in the stomach and duodenum have been reported in patients with IB (15–28). The density of ghrelin cells in the oxyntic mucosa of the stomach has been shown to be lower in IBS-C and higher in IBS-D patients than in healthy controls (15). In the duodenum, the densities of GIP- and somatostatin-secreting cells have been shown to be decreased in both IBS-D and IBS-C patients (17). The densities of duodenal secretin and cholecystokinin (CCK) cells are decreased in IBS-D patients but unaltered in IBS-C patients (17). The duodenal serotonin cells are not affected in both IBS-D and IBS-C patients (17). Post-infectious IBS has been found to be associated with increased numbers of duodenal CCK cells but decreased numbers of serotonin cells (16). The present observation of abnormalities in the antral endocrine supports the suggestion that the endocrine cells are abnormal in all the segments of the gastrointestinal tract and IBS is a disorder that is not restricted to the large intestine. The present findings emphasise the role of gut endocrine cells in the pathophysiology of IBS. Moreover, they lend support to the assumption that abnormalities in gastrointestinal cells can explain the dysmotility, abdominal visceral hypersensitivity and abnormal gut secretion observed in patients with IBS (64,65).

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by a grant from Helse-Fonna.

References

  • 1.Moran GW, Leslie FC, Levison SE, Worthington J, McLaughlin JT. Enteroendocrine cells: neglected players in gastrointestinal disorders? Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2008;1:51–60. doi: 10.1177/1756283X08093943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.El-Salhy M, Seim I, Chopin L, Gundersen D, Hatlebakk JG, Hausken T. Irritable bowel syndrome: the role of gut neuroendocrine peptides. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2012;4:2783–2800. doi: 10.2741/e583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.El-Salhy M, Ostgaard H, Gundersen D, Hatlebakk JG, Hausken T. The role of diet in the pathogenesis and management of irritable bowel syndrome (Review) Int J Mol Med. 2012;29:723–731. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.El-Salhy M, Gundersen D, Hatlebakk JG, Hausken T. Irritable bowel syndrome: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment options. Nova Science Publishers Inc; New York: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sternini C, Anselmi L, Rozengurt E. Enteroendocrine cells: a site of ‘taste’ in gastrointestinal chemosensing. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2008;15:73–78. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e3282f43a73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sternini C. Taste receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. IV. Functional implications of bitter taste receptors in gastrointestinal chemosensing. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;292:G457–G461. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00411.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Raybould HE. Gut chemosensing: interactions between gut endocrine cells and visceral afferents. Auton Neurosci. 2010;153:41–46. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2009.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Raybould HE. Nutrient sensing in the gastrointestinal tract: possible role for nutrient transporters. J Physiol Biochem. 2008;64:349–356. doi: 10.1007/BF03174091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bertrand PP, Bertrand RL. Serotonin release and uptake in the gastrointestinal tract. Auton Neurosci. 2010;153:47–57. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2009.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Akiba Y, Kaunitz JD. Luminal chemosensing in the duodenal mucosa. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2011;201:77–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02149.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Steinert RE, Beglinger C. Nutrient sensing in the gut: interactions between chemosensory cells, visceral afferents and the secretion of satiation peptides. Physiol Behav. 2011;105:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nakamura E, Hasumura M, Uneyama H, Torii K. Luminal amino acid-sensing cells in gastric mucosa. Digestion. 2011;83(Suppl 1):13–18. doi: 10.1159/000323399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tolhurst G, Reimann F, Gribble FM. Intestinal sensing of nutrients. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2012:309–335. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-24716-3_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mace OJ, Schindler M, Patel S. The regulation of K- and L-cell activity by GLUT2 and the calcium-sensing receptor CasR in rat small intestine. J Physiol. 2012;590:2917–2936. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.223800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.El-Salhy M, Lillebo E, Reinemo A, Salmelid L. Ghrelin in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Int J Mol Med. 2009;23:703–707. doi: 10.3892/ijmm_00000183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dizdar V, Spiller R, Singh G, et al. Relative importance of abnormalities of CCK and 5-HT (serotonin) in Giardia-induced post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:883–891. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04251.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.El-Salhy M, Vaali K, Dizdar V, Hausken T. Abnormal small-intestinal endocrine cells in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:3508–3513. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1169-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.El-Salhy M, Gundersen D, Ostgaard H, Lomholt-Beck B, Hatlebakk JG, Hausken T. Low densities of serotonin and peptide YY cells in the colon of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:873–878. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1948-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.El-Salhy M, Gundersen D, Hatlebakk JG, Hausken T. Abnormal rectal endocrine cells in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Regul Pept. 2014;188:60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.regpep.2013.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Coates MD, Mahoney CR, Linden DR, et al. Molecular defects in mucosal serotonin content and decreased serotonin reuptake transporter in ulcerative colitis and irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1657–1664. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang SH, Dong L, Luo JY, et al. Decreased expression of serotonin in the jejunum and increased numbers of mast cells in the terminal ileum in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:6041–6047. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.45.6041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee KJ, Kim YB, Kim JH, Kwon HC, Kim DK, Cho SW. The alteration of enterochromaffin cell, mast cell, and lamina propria T lymphocyte numbers in irritable bowel syndrome and its relationship with psychological factors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1689–1694. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Park JH, Rhee PL, Kim G, et al. Enteroendocrine cell counts correlate with visceral hypersensitivity in patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;18:539–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00771.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim HS, Lim JH, Park H, Lee SI. Increased immunoendocrine cells in intestinal mucosa of postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome patients 3 years after acute Shigella infection: an observation in a small case control study. Yonsei Med J. 2010;51:45–51. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dunlop SP, Coleman NS, Blackshaw E, et al. Abnormalities of 5-hydroxytryptamine metabolism in irritable bowel syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:349–357. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00726-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Spiller RC, Jenkins D, Thornley JP, et al. Increased rectal mucosal enteroendocrine cells, T lymphocytes, and increased gut permeability following acute Campylobacter enteritis and in post-dysenteric irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2000;47:804–811. doi: 10.1136/gut.47.6.804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.El-Salhy M, Lomholt-Beck B, Hausken T. Chromogranin A as a possible tool in the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1435–1439. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2010.503965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.El-Salhy M, Mazzawi T, Gundersen D, Hausken T. Chromogranin A cell density in the rectum of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Mol Med Rep. 2012;6:1223–1225. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2012.1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1480–1491. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Spiller R, Aziz Q, Creed F, et al. Guidelines on the irritable bowel syndrome: mechanisms and practical management. Gut. 2007;56:1770–1798. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.119446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Roalfe AK, Roberts LM, Wilson S. Evaluation of the Birmingham IBS symptom questionnaire. BMC Gastroenterol. 2008;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-8-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Talley NJ, Verlinden M, Jones M. Quality of life in functional dyspepsia: responsiveness of the Nepean Dyspepsia Index and development of a new 10-item short form. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:207–216. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00900.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Arslan G, Lind R, Olafsson S, Florvaag E, Berstad A. Quality of life in patients with subjective food hypersensitivity: applicability of the 10-item short form of the Nepean Dyspepsia Index. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:680–687. doi: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000026318.81635.3b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Patrick DL, Drossman DA, Frederick IO, DiCesare J, Puder KL. Quality of life in persons with irritable bowel syndrome: development and validation of a new measure. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:400–411. doi: 10.1023/a:1018831127942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Drossman DA, Patrick DL, Whitehead WE, et al. Further validation of the IBS-QOL: a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:999–1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01941.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gershon MD, Tack J. The serotonin signaling system: from basic understanding to drug development for functional GI disorders. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:397–414. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gershon MD. Plasticity in serotonin control mechanisms in the gut. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2003;3:600–607. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2003.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gershon MD. 5-Hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) in the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2013;20:14–21. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32835bc703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gershon MD. Serotonin is a sword and a shield of the bowel: serotonin plays offense and defense. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2012;123:268–280. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Camilleri M, Andrews CN, Bharucha AE, et al. Alterations in expression of p11 and SERT in mucosal biopsy specimens of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:17–25. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Camilleri M, Busciglio I, Carlson P, et al. Candidate genes and sensory functions in health and irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008;295:G219–G225. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90202.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kumar S, Ranjan P, Mittal B, Ghoshal UC. Serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) polymorphism in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and healthy controls. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2012;21:31–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Park JM, Choi MG, Park JA, et al. Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism and irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;18:995–1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00829.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Saito YA, Locke GR, III, Zimmerman JM, et al. A genetic association study of 5-HTT LPR and GNbeta3 C825T polymorphisms with irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2007;19:465–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.00905.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wendelbo I, Mazzawi T, El-Salhy M. Increased serotonin transporter immunoreactivity intensity in the ileum of patients with irritable bowel disease. Mol Med Rep. 2013;9:180–184. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.El-Salhy M, Wendelbo I, Gundersen D. Serotonin and serotonin transporter in the rectum of patients with irritable bowel disease. Mol Med Rep. 2013;8:451–455. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schubert ML. Gastric secretion. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2011;27:536–542. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32834bd53f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schubert ML. Gastric secretion. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;26:598–603. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32833f2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schubert ML. Gastric secretion. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2007;23:595–601. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282f03462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Schubert ML. Gastric secretion. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2002;18:639–649. doi: 10.1097/00001574-200211000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chu S, Schubert ML. Gastric secretion. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28:587–593. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e328358e5cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Van Citters GW, Lin HC. Ileal brake: neuropeptidergic control of intestinal transit. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2006;8:367–373. doi: 10.1007/s11894-006-0021-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pourhoseingholi A, Vahedi M, Pourhoseingholi MA, et al. Irritable bowel syndrome, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia: overlap analysis using loglinear models. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2012;13:20–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kim HG, Lee KJ, Lim SG, Jung JY, Cho SW. G-protein beta3 subunit C825T polymorphism in patients with overlap syndrome of functional dyspepsia and irritable Bowel syndrome. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;18:205–210. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2012.18.2.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Suzuki H, Hibi T. Overlap syndrome of functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome - are both diseases mutually exclusive? J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17:360–365. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2011.17.4.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nakajima S, Takahashi K, Sato J, et al. Spectra of functional gastrointestinal disorders diagnosed by Rome III integrative questionnaire in a Japanese outpatient office and the impact of overlapping. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25(Suppl 1):S138–S143. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Olafsdottir LB, Gudjonsson H, Jonsdottir HH, Thjodleifsson B. Stability of the irritable bowel syndrome and subgroups as measured by three diagnostic criteria - a 10-year follow-up study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:670–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04388.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kaji M, Fujiwara Y, Shiba M, et al. Prevalence of overlaps between GERD, FD and IBS and impact on health-related quality of life. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:1151–1156. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06249.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Noh YW, Jung HK, Kim SE, Jung SA. Overlap of erosive and non-erosive reflux diseases with functional gastrointestinal disorders according to rome III criteria. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;16:148–156. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2010.16.2.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hori K, Matsumoto T, Miwa H. Analysis of the gastrointestinal symptoms of uninvestigated dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome. Gut Liver. 2009;3:192–196. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2009.3.3.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ford AC, Marwaha A, Lim A, Moayyedi P. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in individuals with dyspepsia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:401–409. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang LH, Fang XC, Pan GZ. Bacillary dysentery as a causative factor of irritable bowel syndrome and its pathogenesis. Gut. 2004;53:1096–1101. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.021154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dunlop SP, Jenkins D, Neal KR, Spiller RC. Relative importance of enterochromaffin cell hyperplasia, anxiety, and depression in postinfectious IBS. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1651–1659. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.El-Salhy M, Gundersen D, Gilja OH, Hatlebakk JG, Hausken T. Is irritable bowel syndrome an organic disorder? World J Gastroenterol. 2014;2:384–400. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i2.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.El-Salhy M, Hatlebakk JG, Gilja OH, Hausken T. Irritable bowel syndrome: recent developments in diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;8:435–443. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2014.888952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES