Abstract
It is unknown whether loss of skeletal muscle mass and function experienced by astronauts during space flight could be augmented by ionizing radiation (IR), such as low-dose high-charge and energy (HZE) particles or low-dose high-energy proton radiation. In the current study adult mice were irradiated whole-body with either a single dose of 15 cGy of 1 GeV/n 56Fe-particle or with a 90 cGy proton of 1 GeV/n proton particles. Both ionizing radiation types caused alterations in the skeletal muscle cytoplasmic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) homeostasis. 56Fe-particle irradiation also caused a reduction of depolarization-evoked Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). The increase in the [Ca2+]i was detected as early as 24 h after 56Fe-particle irradiation, while effects of proton irradiation were only evident at 72 h. In both instances [Ca2+]i returned to baseline at day 7 after irradiation. All 56Fe-particle irradiated samples revealed a significant number of centrally localized nuclei, a histologic manifestation of regenerating muscle, 7 days after irradiation. Neither unirradiated control or proton-irradiated samples exhibited such a phenotype. Protein analysis revealed significant increase in the phosphorylation of Akt, Erk1/2 and rpS6k on day 7 in 56Fe-particle irradiated skeletal muscle, but not proton or unirradiated skeletal muscle, suggesting activation of pro-survival signaling. Our findings suggest that a single low-dose 56Fe-particle or proton exposure is sufficient to affect Ca2+ homeostasis in skeletal muscle. However, only 56Fe-particle irradiation led to the appearance of central nuclei and activation of pro-survival pathways, suggesting an ongoing muscle damage/recovery process.
INTRODUCTION
Low-dose ionizing radiation, such as that experienced by astronauts in space, could potentially augment the progressive loss of muscle mass and alterations in muscle function initially mediated by limited musculoskeletal use during exploration-type space missions (1, 2). While there is a significant amount of data demonstrating that limited musculoskeletal use is a key contributor to development of musculoskeletal functional deficits (1–9), the effects of low-dose ionizing radiation such as 56Fe particles and protons, on skeletal muscle functional processes are largely unknown (10, 11). Although results of earlier histological investigations suggested that ionizing-radiation-induced skeletal muscle tissue alterations do not significantly impair skeletal muscle function, more recent studies demonstrate that certain functional aspects of adult skeletal muscle tissue stem cells (satellite cells), which are responsible for regeneration and repair of damaged skeletal muscle, are negatively affected by clinical radio-therapeutic regimens (≥2 Gy single and 40–60 Gy cumulative), years and decades (5–30 years) after cancer radiotherapy (12–14).
Two major sources of ionizing radiation in space include the galactic cosmic rays (GCR) and the solar particle event (SPE). One of the concerns for manned interplanetary missions is that within a few hours or days, a large SPE could subject the spacecraft and its crew to a radiation dose that is potentially equivalent to a year-long GCR exposure (15, 16). However, unlike SPEs, GCR present as a low-dose background exposure 24 h a day every day and consist of particles that range in energy from ~10 to ≥1,000 MeV/nucleon, with fluence peak frequencies around 300–700 MeV/nucleon (15). Because of the wide energy range of GCR, effective shielding from this type of radiation is not be feasible. Therefore, GCR particles could provide a steady source of low-dose-rate radiation and this accumulated exposure might be a limiting factor for long-term exploration-type space missions. It has been determined that 99% of GCR are composed of protons and helium, while only 1% of GCR are composed of ions heavier than helium (17, 18). These heavier than helium ions are referred to as high-charge (Z) and high-energy (E) particles (HZE). During the future prolonged space missions, such as those to the Moon, near Earth asteroids and Mars, approximately 40% of the dose-equivalent exposure is predicted to be from HZE particles, with iron (56Fe) particles alone constituting approximately 13% of the total (19, 20). Thus, it is feasible that HZE radiation-induced skeletal muscle tissue damage may produce considerable radiobiological responses (e.g., DNA damage and repair, inflammation, changes in cellular Ca2+ handling and activation of intracellular signal transduction pathways, etc.) during exploration-type space missions.
Disruption of normal skeletal muscle function is frequently characterized by aberrant intracellular Ca2+ handling that in some instances may occur well before the appearance of histopathological and clinical symptoms (21, 22). There are two main aspects of skeletal muscle Ca2+ handling that may be affected by space radiation. The first aspect is the basal cytoplasmic [Ca2+] ([Ca2+]i) which is maintained by ion channels and ATP-driven Ca2+ pumps on the surface of the cell, as well as channels and pumps on the membrane of intracellular Ca2+ storing organelles, such as the sarcoplasmic reticulum (23). Alterations in [Ca2+]i can have long term deleterious effects on muscle contractility and numerous other intracellular processes. The second aspect involves the process of excitation-contraction coupling. In this process, a rapid cascade of events is initiated by an action potential that activates the L-type Ca2+ channels, the dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) in the transverse tubules (TT). Activated DHPRs rapidly trigger massive release of Ca2+ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum by Ca2+ release channels, the ryanodine receptors (RyRs) that reside in the junctional region of the sarcoplasmic reticulum immediately adjacent to the TT membrane (23). The resulting release of Ca2+ produces a transient increase in intracellular [Ca2+], which activates the contractile apparatus of muscle fibers. Ca2+ is sequestered back into sarcoplasmic reticulum by sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) and cleared out of the cells by plasmalemmal Ca2+ APTases (PMCA) and to a lesser extent by Na/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) (24, 25). Alterations in each of the components of excitation-contraction coupling could result either in reduction of Ca2+ release that would lead to reduced activation of contractile machinery or to elevated [Ca2+]i, which can affect numerous downstream processes, including but not limited to, regulation of gene expression, regeneration, mitochondrial function, apoptosis and necrosis.
It remains to be elucidated whether low-dose HZE space radiation can induce adverse effect in skeletal muscle that could directly influence the functional state of the skeletal muscle tissue. Therefore, we hypothesized that space radiation-induced responses in skeletal muscle are radiation type (proton vs. iron) and time dependent. The goal of the current study was to determine whether a single, whole-body radiation exposure to either 15 cGy of 1 GeV/n 56Fe particles as a model for GCR or 90 cGy of 1 Gev/n low-dose high-energy protons as a model for SPE may lead to alterations in [Ca2+]i and stimulation of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release in murine skeletal muscle, as well as to determine whether these doses may induce detectable changes in the skeletal muscle.
METHODS
Animals, Muscle Fiber Preparation
Adult 8–10-month-old male C57Bl/6N mice were shipped directly form Taconic (Hudson, NY) to Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL). Mice were fed standard laboratory chow diet (Harlan Teklad), were given water access ad libitum and kept in a temperature- and light-controlled environment (12 h light/dark cycles). All protocols were approved by both, the Steward St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center and BNL Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees. Animals were housed at BNL and at Steward St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center animal facility and were individually caged as these mice were retired male breeders that often fight and induce skin lesions.
Irradiation and Dosimetry
Both, low-LET proton (1H) and high-LET iron (56Fe) exposures were performed at Brookhaven National Laboratory in the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory according to standardized procedures. Before whole-body irradiation, the animals were placed individually into rectangular polystyrene boxes with multiple air holes (4 mm in diameter). Particle radiation (1H and 56Fe) was delivered at the entrance plateau region of the beam (20 × 20 cm field), at the beginning of the Bragg peak, such that linear energy transfer (LET) levels were held constant throughout the target volume. All radiation was delivered to yield a cumulative 90 cGy dose for 1H-ion (at the average dose rate 30 ± 5 cGy/min) and 15 cGy dose for 56F-ion (at the average dose rate 5 ± 0.5 cGy/min). Both, 1H- and 56Fe-particle irradiations were delivered at the energy of 1,000 MeV/nucleon. The irradiated mice were immediately driven to Steward St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center in Boston (3–4 h) for housing and analysis.
Gamma radiation experiments were performed at Steward St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center using a Cesium (137Cs) source irradiator that delivered an average dose rate of 46.6 cGy/min. Mice were placed in special polypropylene boxes (3.25 × 4.25 × 2.25 inches) with 4 mm holes drilled to produce a stress-free environment. All animals used for this study were handled the same way and were fully conscious prior to and post whole-body irradiation. The duration of restraint in plastic boxes were standardized across all radiation exposures and the total time in the boxes was no more than 3–4 min.
Skeletal Muscle Sample Collection and Myofiber Isolation
Mice were euthanized by pentobarbital overdose at respective time points of 1 h for gamma radiation (1 Gy) studies and at 24, 48, 72 h and day 7 for 56Fe particle (15 cGy, 1 GeV/n) and protons (90 cGy, 1 GeV/n) studies. Flexor digitorum brevis muscles were removed and placed in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 2 mg/ml collagenase A (Roche, Nutley, NJ) and incubated for 3 h at 37°C. Thereafter, muscles were removed from the enzyme-containing buffer and rinsed twice in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium. Muscle bundles were then transferred to DMEM supplemented with 10% bovine serum, 1% penicillin, 1% streptomycin and 1% glutamine and gently triturated with a polished glass pipette until a significant portion was dissociated to single cells. Myofibers were plated onto extracellular matrix (ECM) coated (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) glass-bottom dishes (MatTek, Ashland, MA) and allowed to settle to the bottom of the dish overnight in an incubator at 5% CO2 and 37°C.
Fluorescence Recordings
All reagents, unless otherwise indicated, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Cells were bathed in a normal Ringer solution containing in [mM]: [125] NaCl, [5] KCl, [1.2] MgSO4, [6] glucose, [25] HEPES, [2] CaCl2, pH 7.4. For resting [Ca2+]i measurements, cells were loaded with Fura-2AM (5 μM for 30 min). Relative resting [Ca2+]i was assessed by ratio of 340 nm/380 nm emissions of the dye. For stimulated Ca2+ release measurements, myofibers were loaded at room temperature for 30 min in Ringer solution supplemented with Ca2+ indicator dye magFluo-4AM, 5 μM, (Molecular Probes, Eugene OR). Cells were later washed several times with Ringer solution to terminate further loading and placed in a 37°C incubator for de-esterification of the dye. To eliminate the motion artifacts due to muscle contraction, N-benzyl-p-toluene sulphonamide (BTS, 50 μM), an inhibitor of the myosin II ATPase, was added to the bathing solution. Whole cell fluorescence changes were detected using an IonOptix fluorescence system (IonOptix, Milton, MA) interfaced with an inverted Zeiss Axiovert 200 microscope equipped with a Neofluar 40× oil immersion objective. Changes in fluorescence were detected by a photo multiplier tube (PMT) recording signal at 5 kHz. Ca2+ transients were elicited by applying supra-threshold square wave pulses (1 ms duration) through two platinum electrodes placed on opposite sides of the experimental chamber. Changes in intracellular [Ca2+]i were characterized as changes in fluorescence intensity of the dye. All experiments were conducted at room temperature (22°C). Detected changes in fluorescence within each cell were analyzed using IonOptix imaging software (IonOptix, Milton, MA). The resulting fluorescence changes were corrected for the background fluorescence within individual cells by dividing the magnitude of change in fluorescence (ΔF) by the mean baseline fluorescence intensity (F0) to give the ΔF/F values.
Histology, Imaging and Analysis
Adductor magnus and gluteus maximus from mouse hind limbs were carefully bisected, cross sectioned through the middle and fixed in formalin. Sections (6 μm) were stained with H&E and visualized using a light microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Images of the full circumference of the cross sections of the above mentioned muscles were taken at 5×, 10×, 20× and 40× magnifications (Nikon Instruments, Inc., Melville, NY). Samples were coded and a single pathologist blinded to the treatment conditions evaluated muscle tissue in at least 4–5 animals of the control mice, proton- and 56Fe-particle-irradiated mice. In addition, two laboratory members were also blinded to treatment conditions independently of each other counted centrally located nuclei by delineating individual muscle fibers in 20× magnification images and identifying number of central nuclei/muscle fiber (NIH, ImageJ software; http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). Images of each stained muscle sample were taken at 20× magnification across the board and the average number of muscle fibers per visual field was ~85 individual fibers. Results were represented as mean number of central nuclei/muscle fiber and differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
Western Blot Analysis
Half of bisected adductor magnus and gluteus maximus muscles (N = 3/treatment group) were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after collection. A small portion (10–15 mg) of the muscle tissue was homogenized using tissue homogenizer in RIPA lysis buffer (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA) to prepare whole tissue lysates. Samples containing 50 μg of total protein from the whole-muscle tissue lysates were mixed with equal volume of 2× sample buffer and boiled for 5 min at 95°C. Protein fractions were then separated by electrophoresis on a 10% polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad) and blotted onto PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad). Detection of total (T) and phosphorylated (p) Akt1 (also known as Protein Kinase B – PKB, a serine/threonine-specific kinase), Erk1/2 (Extracellular-signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2, also known as classical Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase – MAPK) and rpS6k (ribosomal protein S6 kinase, an effector kinase downstream to mTORC1 - mammalian target of rapamycin C1) protein levels were performed using 1:1,000 dilution of rabbit monoclonal antibody against phospho-specific and total-specific mouse antibodies (p-Akt, cat. no. 9275S, T-Akt, cat. no. 4685S; p-Erk1/2, cat. no. 9101S, T-Erk1/2, cat. no. 9102S; p-rpS6k, cat. no. 2215S, T-rpS6k, cat. no. 2217S, all Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA). As secondary antibody, HRP-linked goat anti-rabbit IgG at 1:1000 dilution was used (cat. no. 7074S Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA). Gapdh (cat. no. MAB374; 1:40,000 dilution Millipore, Billerica, MA) expression was used to adjust the protein loading. As secondary antibody, HRP-linked anti-mouse IgG at 1:1,000 dilution was used (cat. no. 7076S, Cell Signaling Technology Inc.). Protein levels were revealed using enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting method (ECL, Fisher Scientific).
Statistical Analysis
All results were expressed as mean ± SEM and plots were obtained. Statistical analysis was performed on the data by one-way ANOVA (Prism5 Software, GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA and Stat View Software, SAS Institute Inc., Gary, NC). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
RESULTS
Effects of γ Radiation on Skeletal Muscle
We sought to determine whether exposure of mice to low-dose γ-radiation produces alterations in skeletal muscle Ca2+ homeostasis. We compared basal myoplasmic [Ca2+]i in Flexor digitorum brevis muscle fibers isolated from 1 Gy whole-body γ-irradiated and nonirradiated animals using Fura-2 fluorescence emission ratios. Muscle fibers from mice that were sacrificed 1-h postirradiation exhibited higher Fura-2 fluorescence ratios compared to the fibers from the nonirradiated animals, suggesting an increased myoplasmic [Ca2+]i (Fig. 1). To determine whether this type and dose of radiation induced prolonged effects on Ca2+ homeostasis, we also assessed [Ca2+]i at day 7 postirradiation. At day 7, [Ca2+]i from irradiated muscle was not statistically different from the nonirradiated controls (data not shown). These results indicate that a single dose of 1 Gy whole-body γ radiation is sufficient to induce acute, short-duration changes in skeletal muscle Ca2+ homeostasis.
Effects of Low-Dose 56Fe-Particle Radiation on Skeletal Muscle
To determine the effects of 56Fe-particle radiation on skeletal muscle, mice were irradiated with a single dose of 15 cGy at the energy of 1,000 MeV/nucleon (1 GeV/n). The initial series of experiments assessed the potential changes in the basal [Ca2+]i estimated as the Fura-2 fluorescence emission ratio as well as changes in the depolarization-evoked Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (i.e., EC coupling) 24 h after irradiation. As demonstrated in Fig. 2, skeletal muscle fibers isolated from the 56Fe-particle-irradiated animals exhibited a significant increase in [Ca2+]i compared to the cells isolated from the control, nonirradiated animals 24 h postirradiation (Fig. 2A). At the same time point there was a significant decrease in the amplitude of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release (Fig. 2B and C). At 48 h and day 7 time points, basal [Ca2+]i was not statistically different than the values in the nonirradiated control mice (Fig. 2A), suggesting an effective recovery. Conversely, the reduced Ca2+ transient amplitude persisted at 48 h time point (Fig. 2B, C) in muscle cells from the irradiated animals. At day 7, Ca2+ transient amplitude was similar between control and irradiated muscle. These results demonstrate that 56Fe-particle irradiation results in relatively rapid changes in skeletal muscle Ca2+ handling and that those aspects of muscle function are able to recover by day 7.
Effect of Low-Dose Proton Radiation on Skeletal Muscle
To determine the effects of proton radiation on skeletal muscle Ca2+ handling we performed similar measurements in muscle cells isolated from animals irradiated with 90 cGy of 1 GeV/n protons. Unlike in the 56Fe-particle irradiated muscle, proton radiation at this specific dose and energy, did not result in changes in basal [Ca2+] at the 24 h time point (Fig. 3A). However, at 72 h postirradiation there was significant increase in the [Ca2+]i, analogous to that observed with 56Fe particle at 24 h (Fig. 2A). At one week there was no difference between the control and proton-irradiated muscle fibers (not shown). Whereas after 15 cGy of 1 GeV/n 56Fe-particle irradiation, myofibers exhibited immediate decrease followed by recovery at 7 days (Fig. 2B and C), analysis of the Ca2+ transients in dissociated muscle fibers from 90 cGy, 1 GeV/n proton-irradiated muscle, a sixfold higher dose of proton, showed no change at either 24 or 72 h (Fig. 3B and C). These results indicate that changes in Ca2+ handling mediated by the proton irradiation follow a different time course than the changes induced by exposure to the 56Fe-particle irradiation.
Iron Radiation Increases the Number of Central Nuclei
Changes in the muscle intracellular Ca2+ handling are sometimes associated with a pathologic process or state. In skeletal muscle the regenerative processes in response to muscle damage are often manifested histologically by the appearance of nuclei in the center of the myofibers (26–28). This is in contrast to the healthy, nonregenerating myofibers, in which nuclei are located in the periphery of the cell, just beneath the cytoplasmic membrane. After a single dose of 56Fe-particle-radiation, muscle cells were able to recover by 1 week with respect to Ca2+ homeostasis, thus suggesting a potential activation of recovery or regenerative processes. To determine whether irradiated muscle fibers were undergoing regeneration, we performed H&E staining of abductor magnus and gluteus maximus muscle cross sections from the proton and 56Fe-particle irradiated mice and compared them to the nonirradiated muscle. As demonstrated in Fig. 4, at day 7 postirradiation there was a large number of myofibrils with centrally located nuclei in 56Fe-particle-irradiated muscles but not proton-irradiated muscles or control muscles (5.8 ± 1.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.6 and 0.9 ± 0.2, 56Fe particle vs. proton and iron, P < 0.0001 for both) (Fig. 4 A and B). All nonirradiated and the majority of proton-irradiated samples exhibited morphological properties consistent with histologically unremarkable skeletal muscle (29) with an exception of one proton sample that showed a few atrophic muscle fibers (one fiber per 40× magnification field) and focal peri-capillary edema. In contrast, 56Fe-particle-irradiated samples exhibited greater number of areas with muscular atrophy (see Supplementary Fig. S1A; http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR3329.1.S1) and disruption of muscle fibers (see Supplementary Fig. S1B; http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR3329.1.S1), focal cytoplasmic vacuolization (see Supplementary Fig. S1C; http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR3329.1.S1) and a significant number of muscle fibers with centrally located nuclei (Fig. 4A and B). Some muscle fibers had more than four centrally located nuclei/fiber. These results indicate that a single whole-body low-dose 56Fe-particle irradiation causes damage to the muscle tissue that is sufficient to cause an initiation of the regenerative processes.
Regulation of Erk1/2, Akt and rpS6k Phosphorylation after Iron and Proton Radiation
Exposure of cells and tissues to a variety of stresses, including clinically relevant doses of ionizing radiation (30), induces compensatory activations of multiple intra-cellular pro-survival signaling pathways (31), such as Akt, Erk1/2 and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (32). We sought to determine the potential involvement of Akt, Erk1/2 and mTOR in the low-dose 56Fe-particle- and proton-radiation-induced responses in the skeletal muscle at day 7 post-irradiation. This time point was chosen based on the significantly increased number of central myonuclei (Fig. 4A and B) and findings of morphological alterations during histologic examination compared to other investigated time points. The basal phosphorylation levels of p-Erk1/2, p-Akt and p-rpS6k (an effector kinase downstream of mTORC1) were relatively higher and more variable in the control samples compared to proton-irradiated skeletal muscle tissue (Fig. 5A, C, E). This suggests that there may be a requirement of some level of activity of these proteins for proper maintenance/homeostasis in adult mice skeletal muscle tissue (33, 34). On day 7, there was a significant (5 to 16-fold) increase in the expression of phosphorylated p-Erk1/2 (56Fe vs. proton, P < 0.03), p-Akt (56Fe vs. proton, P < 0.002) and p-rpS6k (56Fe vs. proton, P < 0.01) in 56Fe-particle-irradiated compared to proton-irradiated skeletal muscle (Fig. 5A–F). There was no significant change in total protein levels of Erk1/2, Akt and rpS6k. These results indicate that a single low-dose whole-body 56Fe-particle irradiation activates pro-survival, protective and repair/recovery intracellular signaling pathways in skeletal muscle tissue.
DISCUSSION
There is extensive literature on the effects of weightlessness on the musculoskeletal system, however, very little is known about the effects of space radiation on muscle physiology (11, 35–41). Negative effects on musculoskeletal alterations in skeletal muscle were reported recently in mice irradiated with 20–50 cGy of simulated galactic cosmic rays, an exposure and type of radiation relevant to a space flight (11). During future missions to the Moon, near Earth asteroids and Mars, astronauts will be exposed to a complex mixture of radiation from GCRs, the currently limited studies underscore the need for further investigations using wide-range of ionizing ions (proton and HZE) with different energies. The current study sought to investigate the effects of single whole-body low-dose high-energy proton irradiation as a model for SPE (90 cGy, 1 GeV/n) and HZE irradiation as a model for GCR (e.g., 15 cGy of 1 GeV/n 56Fe particle,) on skeletal muscle physiology in adult (10 months old) C57Bl/6N WT mice. We believe that this approach may allow for evaluation of biological responses of skeletal muscle to a single-ion irradiation and could provide a foundation for modeling of the complex ion-space radiation during exploration-type missions (15, 16, 19, 20).
The current data indicate that proton and 56Fe-particle irradiation resulted in intra-myofiber alterations in Ca2+ handling. Whole-body 56Fe-particle irradiation mediated a rapid cellular response, observed within 24 h postirradiation, this response was characterized by a significant rise in the resting cytoplasmic [Ca2+] and a reduction in the depolarization-evoked Ca2+ release form the sarcoplasmic reticulum, suggesting that these are potential functional alterations in the muscle excitation-contraction coupling. These processes are key regulators of muscle contractility, as well as other cellular functions (23). It is interesting to note that there was also a relatively effective recovery back to baseline in both of these functional processes within 7 days postirradiation.
The effects of proton irradiation followed a very different time course compared to 56Fe-particle irradiation. The only changes that were observed included the increase in the [Ca2+]i at 72 h post-treatment, which also recovered by day 7. However, unlike 56Fe-particle irradiation, the proton irradiation did not result in alterations in the Ca2+ release. The functional alterations reported here suggest that ionizing radiation can indeed cause alterations in skeletal muscle function. Further investigation into the effect of both types of radiation, such as the dose response, different energies, multiple and/or fractionated exposures, are necessary to identify the underlying mechanisms and thresholds for each type of irradiation on muscle Ca2+ handling.
Effects of γ radiation on skeletal muscle at high clinically-relevant doses (>2–5 Gy, cumulative up to 60 Gy) have been examined extensively in rodent models (42, 43). These studies have shown that at high doses γ radiation may decrease muscle adaptation to physiologic stresses (i.e., overload, exercise, etc.) and decrease skeletal muscle ability to recover after damage (i.e., repeated irradiation, DNA damaging agents, etc.). The effects of lower doses (≤1 Gy) of γ radiation on skeletal muscle are important to investigate because it is a principal/baseline type of ionizing radiation (44). More recently, a study in mice using 20–50 cGy of simulated GCRs (more relevant to deep-space travel radiation type and doses) have shown increase in smaller diameter fibers and more fibers containing central nuclei (11), suggesting skeletal muscle damage followed by regeneration at these low mixed ion radiation doses. Our studies, in contrast, have shown that a single dose of 15 cGy of 1 GeV/n 56Fe-particles resulted in an increase in the number of central nuclei (suggestive of degeneration followed by regeneration) and activation of intracellular survival pathways (Akt/mTOR and Erk1/2), whereas proton irradiation at the dose of 90 cGy and 1 GeV/n energy had no detectable effect on either muscle regeneration or on activation of the survival pathways. In spite of very significant difference in the radiation dose (sixfold higher dose for iron) and ~700-fold difference in the LET (150 keV/micron LET for iron and 0.22 keV/micron LET for proton) at 1 GeV/n energy for both ions, our findings suggest that additional studies are necessary to examine further biological responses in the skeletal muscle using various combinations of dose and fluences for proton and iron radiation. This may allow for more accurate development of predictive mathematical models for space radiation-induced degenerative risk estimates in skeletal muscle tissue.
In skeletal muscle the regenerative processes in response to muscle damage are often manifested histologically by the appearance of nuclei in the center of the myofibers (26–28). Here we report divergent regulation of skeletal muscle damage and regeneration after a single dose of 56Fe-particle and proton radiation. The results of our study demonstrate that in addition to alterations in Ca2+ handling 56Fe-particle irradiation also caused the appearance of muscle degeneration, exhibited by muscular atrophy and disruption of muscle fibers, along with centrally localized nuclei, which suggest the activation of degenerative/regenerative processes.
Ionizing radiation induces double-strand breaks (DSBs) and generates reactive oxygen species, both, leading to activation of multiple protective downstream signaling pathways, including but not limited to Erk1/2 and PI3K/Akt/mTOR/p70S6K (30). Studies have shown that PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Erk1/2 are involved in skeletal muscle hypertrophy, survival, differentiation and regeneration (32, 45–49). The increased activations of Akt (Thr308), Erk1/2 and mTOR (p-rpS6k) observed in 56Fe-particle irradiated mouse skeletal muscles suggest these protective pathways were activated. In addition, the activations of these pathways combined with increase of central nuclei in 56Fe-particle irradiated samples may suggest that activation of these survival pathways, perhaps, represent a protective response of the skeletal muscle to considerable 56Fe-particle-radiation-induced damage.
There are two potential mechanisms of the initial radiation effects on activation of cellular membrane receptors and downstream activation of intracellular signal transduction pathways. One of these involves the radiation induced, direct DNA damage (i.e., double-strand breaks) that activates DNA damage responses, which subsequently mediate the cascade of intracellular invents. These signaling events include, but are not limited to, activation of DNA repair complexes and cell cycle checkpoints, apoptosis, as well as activation of receptors/intracellular pathways (e.g., Erk1/2, Akt, mTOR, etc.) (50). This type of response is referred to as an inside-out response (30). During the inside-out response, the radiation ionizes molecules in the cytoplasm, thereby generating large amounts of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS) (51). These reactive molecules inhibit activation of receptor and nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (e.g., Erk1/2, Akt, mTOR), which are the upstream effectors of numerous signal transduction pathways. The other mechanism may involve an outside-in response with altered paracrine ligand activity and receptor reactivation (30). Therefore DNA or membrane-associated receptor activation or both could be responsible for skeletal muscle responses detected in our study. Future studies with significantly different experimental design should include equal dose and/or equal fluence comparisons for proton and iron radiation to determine the spatial and temporal effects of comparable proton and 56Fe-particle irradiation on activation of various cellular and tissue biological responses.
In summary, the current results indicate that both proton and 56Fe-particle radiation cause alterations in the physiological processes of skeletal muscle. The findings of this study underscore a need for further post-ionizing radiation longitudinal studies and possibly additional HZE ion studies.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by grant from NASA (NNJ10ZSA001N) to D.A.G and in part by NIH AR054519 to A.S, NIH HL106098 and AHA-10GRNT471003 grants to X.Y., NIH HL091983 to R.K. Dr. Kishore contributed reagents to be used in our studies and edited the paper. We are grateful to Dr. Adam Rusek and all members of NASA Space Radiation Laboratory and Dr. Peter Guida and all members of Medical Department at the Brookhaven National Laboratory for their valuable support and efforts on this project. We are also grateful to Mr. Yening Zhou a member of Pathology Department and two members of Center of Cancer Systems Biology at Steward St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Mr. Michael Peluso and Ms. Caitlin Coelho for their technical help in automated processing of skeletal muscle samples for routine histology.
Footnotes
Editor’s note. The online version of this article (DOI:10.1667/RR3329.1) contains supplementary information that is available to all authorized users.
References
- 1.Grigoryeva LS, Kozlovskaya IB. Effect of weightlessness and hypokinesis on velocity and strength properties of human muscles. Kosmicheskaya Biologiya I Aviakosmicheskaya Meditsina. 1987;21:27–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Edgerton VR, Zhou MY, Ohira Y, Klitgaard H, Jiang B, Bell G, et al. Human fiber size and enzymatic properties after 5 and 11 days of spaceflight. J Appl Physiol. 1995;78:1733–9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1995.78.5.1733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stevens L, Mounier Y. Ca2+ movements in sarcoplasmic reticulum of rat soleus fibers after hindlimb suspension. J Appl Physiol. 1992;72:1735–40. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1992.72.5.1735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Caiozzo VJ, Haddad F, Baker MJ, Herrick RE, Prietto N, Baldwin KM. Microgravity-induced transformations of myosin isoforms and contractile properties of skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1996;81:123–32. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.1.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Roy RR, Hodgson JA, Aragon J, Day MK, Kozlovskaya I, Edgerton VR. Recruitment of the Rhesus soleus and medial gastrocnemius before, during and after spaceflight. J Gravit Physiol. 1996;3:11–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Widrick JJ, Bangart JJ, Karhanek M, Fitts RH. Soleus fiber force and maximal shortening velocity after non-weight bearing with intermittent activity. J Appl Physiol. 1996;80:981–7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.3.981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fitts RH, Trappe SW, Costill DL, Gallagher PM, Creer AC, Colloton PA, et al. Prolonged space flight-induced alterations in the structure and function of human skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 2010;588:3567–92. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.188508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Trappe S, Creer A, Slivka D, Minchev K, Trappe T. Single muscle fiber function with concurrent exercise or nutrition countermeasures during 60 days of bed rest in women. J Appl Physiol. 2007;103:1242–50. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00560.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Trappe S, Costill D, Gallagher P, Creer A, Peters JR, Evans H, et al. Exercise in space: human skeletal muscle after 6 months aboard the International Space Station. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:1159–68. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91578.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shafirkin AV GeI, Kolomenskiĭ AV. Radiation risk to cosmonauts in a flight to Mars. Aviakosm Ekolog Med. 2004;38:3–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bandstra ER, Thompson RW, Nelson GA, Willey JS, Judex S, Cairns MA, et al. Musculoskeletal changes in mice from 20–50 cGy of simulated galactic cosmic rays. Radiat Res. 2009;172:21–9. doi: 10.1667/RR1509.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Furby A, Behin A, Lefaucheur JP, Beauvais K, Marcorelles P, Mussini JM, et al. Late-onset cervicoscapular muscle atrophy and weakness after radiotherapy for Hodgkin disease: a case series. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:101–4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.167577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jurdana M. Radiation Effects on Skeletal Muscle. Radiol Oncol. 2008;42:15–22. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cho-Lim JJ, Caiozzo VJ, Tseng BP, Giedzinski E, Baker MJ, Limoli CL. Satellite cells say NO to radiation. Radiat Res. 2011;175:561–8. doi: 10.1667/RR2453.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reitz G. Characteristic of the radiation field in low Earth orbit and in deep space. Z Med Phys. 2008;18:233–43. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2008.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. 2006. Information needed to make radiation protection recommendations for space missions beyond low-Earth orbit. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mewaldt RA. Galactic cosmic ray composition and energy spectra. Adv Space Res. 1994;14:737–47. doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(94)90536-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Simpson J. Elemental and Isotopic Composition of the Galactic Cosmic Rays. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science. 1983;33:323–82. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Strategic Program Plan for Space Radiation Health Research. Life Sciences Division OoLaMSaA. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Human Exploration of Mars. The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Boncompagni S, Moussa CE, Levy E, Pezone MJ, Lopez JR, Protasi F, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in skeletal muscle of amyloid precursor protein-overexpressing mice. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:20534–44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.359588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lopez JR, Shtifman A. Intracellular beta-amyloid accumulation leads to age-dependent progression of Ca2+ dysregulation in skeletal muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2010;42:731–8. doi: 10.1002/mus.21745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Melzer WH-FA, Lüttgau HC. The role of Ca2+ ions in excitation-contraction coupling of skeletal muscle fibres. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1995;1241:59–116. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(94)00014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu L, Ishida Y, Okunade G, Shull GE, Paul RJ. Role of plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase in contraction-relaxation processes of the bladder: evidence from PMCA gene-ablated mice. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006;290:C1239–47. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00440.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oloizia B, Paul RJ. Ca2+ clearance and contractility in vascular smooth muscle: evidence from gene-altered murine models. J Mol Cellr Cardiol. 2008;45:347–62. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jahnke VE, Van Der Meulen JH, Johnston HK, Ghimbovschi S, Partridge T, Hoffman EP, et al. Metabolic remodeling agents show beneficial effects in the dystrophin-deficient mdx mouse model. Skelet Muscle. 2012;2:16. doi: 10.1186/2044-5040-2-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Itoh M, Shimokawa N, Tajika Y, Murakami T, Aotsuka N, Lesmana R, et al. Alterations of biochemical marker levels and myonuclear numbers in rat skeletal muscle after ischemia-reperfusion. Mol Cell Biochem. 2013;373:11–8. doi: 10.1007/s11010-012-1470-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ye F, Mathur S, Liu M, Borst SE, Walter GA, Sweeney HL, et al. Overexpression of IGF-1 attenuates skeletal muscle damage and accelerates muscle regeneration and functional recovery after disuse. Exp Physiol. 2013;98:1038–52. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2012.070722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mason SD, Howlett RA, Kim MJ, Olfert IM, Hogan MC, McNulty W, et al. Loss of skeletal muscle HIF-1alpha results in altered exercise endurance. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:e288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Valerie K, Yacoub A, Hagan MP, Curiel DT, Fisher PB, Grant S, et al. Radiation-induced cell signaling: inside-out and outside-in. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:789–801. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dent P, Yacoub A, Contessa J, Caron R, Amorino G, Valerie K, et al. Stress and radiation-induced activation of multiple intracellular signaling pathways. Radiat Res. 2003;159:283–300. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2003)159[0283:sariao]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bodine SC, Stitt TN, Gonzalez M, Kline WO, Stover GL, Bauerlein R, et al. Akt/mTOR pathway is a crucial regulator of skeletal muscle hypertrophy and can prevent muscle atrophy in vivo. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:1014–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb1101-1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Parkington JD, LeBrasseur NK, Siebert AP, Fielding RA. Contraction-mediated mTOR, p70S6k, and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in aged skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97:243–8. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01383.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nature Rev Genetics. 2006;7:606–19. doi: 10.1038/nrg1879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Caiozzo VJ, Baker MJ, Herrick RE, Tao M, Baldwin KM. Effect of spaceflight on skeletal muscle: mechanical properties and myosin isoform content of a slow muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1994;76:1764–73. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.76.4.1764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Widrick JJ, Knuth ST, Norenberg KM, Romatowski JG, Bain JL, Riley DA, et al. Effect of a 17 day spaceflight on contractile properties of human soleus muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1999;516 (Pt 3):915–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0915u.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Riley DA, Bain JL, Thompson JL, Fitts RH, Widrick JJ, Trappe SW, et al. Decreased thin filament density and length in human atrophic soleus muscle fibers after spaceflight. J Appl Physiol. 2000;88:567–72. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.2.567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Widrick JJ, Romatowski JG, Norenberg KM, Knuth ST, Bain JL, Riley DA, et al. Functional properties of slow and fast gastrocnemius muscle fibers after a 17-day spaceflight. J Appl Physiol. 2001;90:2203–11. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.6.2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ferrando AA, Paddon-Jones D, Wolfe RR. Alterations in protein metabolism during space flight and inactivity. Nutrition. 2002;18:837–41. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(02)00930-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Riley DA, Bain JL, Thompson JL, Fitts RH, Widrick JJ, Trappe SW, et al. Thin filament diversity and physiological properties of fast and slow fiber types in astronaut leg muscles. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92:817–25. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00717.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Harrison BC, Allen DL, Girten B, Stodieck LS, Kostenuik PJ, Bateman TA, et al. Skeletal muscle adaptations to microgravity exposure in the mouse. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:2462–70. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00603.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rosenblatt JD, Parry DJ. Gamma irradiation prevents compensatory hypertrophy of overloaded mouse extensor digitorum longus muscle. J Appl Physiol. 1992;73:2538–43. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1992.73.6.2538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rosenblatt JD, Parry DJ. Adaptation of rat extensor digitorum longus muscle to gamma irradiation and overload. Pflugers Arch. 1993;423:255–64. doi: 10.1007/BF00374404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weighting factor (w(R)). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2003;33:1–117. doi: 10.1016/s0146-6453(03)00024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shi H, Zeng C, Ricome A, Hannon KM, Grant AL, Gerrard DE. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway is differentially involved in beta-agonist-induced hypertrophy in slow and fast muscles. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;292:C1681–9. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00466.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ge Y, Wu AL, Warnes C, Liu J, Zhang C, Kawasome H, et al. mTOR regulates skeletal muscle regeneration in vivo through kinase-dependent and kinase-independent mechanisms. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2009;297:C1434–44. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00248.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zanou N, Schakman O, Louis P, Ruegg UT, Dietrich A, Birnbaumer L, et al. Trpc1 ion channel modulates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway during myoblast differentiation and muscle regeneration. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:14524–34. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.341784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gao Y, Ordas R, Klein JD, Price SR. Regulation of caspase-3 activity by insulin in skeletal muscle cells involves both PI3-kinase and MEK-1/2. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105:1772–8. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90636.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Boppart MD, Burkin DJ, Kaufman SJ. Activation of AKT signaling promotes cell growth and survival in alpha7beta1 integrin-mediated alleviation of muscular dystrophy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812:439–46. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Asaithamby A, Uematsu N, Chatterjee A, Story MD, Burma S, Chen DJ. Repair of HZE-particle-induced DNA double-strand breaks in normal human fibroblasts. Radiat Res. 2008;169:437–46. doi: 10.1667/RR1165.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Baluchamy S, Zhang Y, Ravichandran P, Ramesh V, Sodipe A, Hall JC, et al. Differential oxidative stress gene expression profile in mouse brain after proton exposure. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2010;46:718–25. doi: 10.1007/s11626-010-9330-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.