Skip to main content
Neural Regeneration Research logoLink to Neural Regeneration Research
. 2014 Mar 1;9(5):498–499. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.130068

Unusual neural connection between injured cingulum and brainstem in a patient with subarachnoid hemorrhage

Jeong Pyo Seo 1, Sung Ho Jang 1,
PMCID: PMC4153514  PMID: 25206844

The human brain is known to have six cholinergic nuclei (Selden et al., 1998; Nieuwenhuys et al., 2008). The cerebral cortex obtains cholinergic innervation mainly from the basalis nucleus of Meynert (Ch 4) in the basal forebrain through the medial and lateral cholinergic pathways (Selden et al., 1998; Mesulam et al., 1983). The cingulum, the neural fiber bundle connecting the basal forebrain and the medial temporal lobe, contains the medial cholinergic pathway (Selden et al., 1998; Hong and Jang, 2010). In addition, the other cholinergic nuclei in the basal forebrain (Ch 1: medial septal nucleus, Ch 2: vertical nucleus of the diagonal band) are connected to the cingulum (Nieuwenhuys et al., 2008). Therefore, the cingulum is an important pathway for cholinergic innervation for the cerebral cortex. On the other hand, two cholinergic nuclei are located in the brainstem (Ch 5: pedunculopontine nucleus and Ch 6: laterodorsal tegmental nucleus), and are connected to the thalamus (Nieuwenhuys et al., 2008; Mesulam, 1990; Wainer et al., 1993; Lucas-Meunier et al., 2003). Many studies have reported connections between the cholinergic nuclei, especially between the cholinergic nuclei in the basal forebrain and those in the brainstem via the fornix and thalamus (Mesulam, 1990; Wainer et al., 1993; Woolf and Butcher, 1986; Marina et al., 2002; Paxinos, 2004). However, little is known about the connection between cholinergic nuclei in the basal forebrain and cholinergic nuclei in the brainstem via the cingulum (Yeo et al., 2012).

Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT), derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), has the unique advantage of allowing for three-dimensional visualization and estimation of neural tracts in the live human brain (Concha et al., 2005; Malykhin et al., 2008; Yeo et al., 2013). A recent DTT study reported an unusual neural connection between an injured cingulum and a cholinergic nucleus in the brainstem in a patient with traumatic brain injury, suggesting a recovery mechanism following cingulum injury (Yeo et al., 2012). However, no study on this phenomenon in other brain pathology has been reported.

In this study, we report on a patient who showed unusual neural connections between injured cingulums and brainstem cholinergic nuclei following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, using DTT. Ten age- and sex-matched normal control subjects (seven males; mean age: 27.57 years) were recruited for control.

A 50-year-old male patient underwent craniotomy and clipping for a ruptured aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery after subarachnoid hemorrhage at the neurosurgery department of a university hospital (Figure 1A). At 4 weeks after onset, he was transferred to the rehabilitation department of the same hospital. Brain MRI taken at 4 weeks after onset showed leukomalactic lesions in the left frontal lobe (Figure 1A). The patient showed memory impairment at 5 weeks after onset: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: 104, and the Memory Assessment Scale (global memory: 79 (8%ile), short term memory: 111 (77%ile), verbal memory: 94 (35%ile), and visual memory: 71 (3%ile) (Wechsler, 1981; Williams, 1991). His memory function showed improvement, within normal range, at 7 months after onset: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: 125, and the Memory Assessment Scale (global memory: 104 (61%ile), short term memory: 114 (83%ile), verbal memory: 111 (77%ile), and visual memory: 97 (42%ile) (Mesulam, 1990; Williams, 1991).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

DTT and CT images in a 50-year-old male patient ongoing craniotomy and clipping for a ruptured aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery after SAH.

(A) Brain CT images at onset show a subarachnoid hemor-rhage by ruptured aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery; (B) 1-month diffusion tensor tractographies (DTTs) revealed discontinuations of both cingulums above the genu of the corpus callosum, and both cingulums were con-nected to the pedunculopon-tine nuclei bilaterally (arrows). However, the left neural con-nection had disappeared on 7-month DTT and the right neural tract was connected to the right laterodorsal tegmen-tal nucleus (arrow) instead of the right pedunculopontine nucleus; (C) DTT images of the cingulum in two control subjects. SAH: Subarachnoid hemorrhage; R: right; A: ante-rior.

A 6-channel head coil on a 1.5-T Philips Gyroscan Intera scanner (Hoffman-LaRoche, Ltd., Best, the Netherlands) was used for acquisition of DTI data two times at 1 and 7 months after onset. For each of the 32 non-collinear diffusion sensitizing gradients, we acquired 67 contiguous slices parallel to the anterior commissure-posterior commissure line. Imaging parameters were as follows: acquisition matrix = 96 × 96; reconstructed to matrix = 192 × 192; field of view = 240 mm × 240 mm; repetition time = 10,398 ms; echo time = 72 ms; b = 1,000 s/mm2; number of excitations = 1; and slice thickness = 2.5 mm. The fiber assignment continuous tracking (FACT) algorithm was used in performance of fiber tracking (Stieltjes et al., 2001). The cingulum areas were reconstructed using fibers passing through two regions of interest (middle and posterior portion of the cingulum). Termination criteria were fractional anisotropy < 0.15 and an angle change > 27° (Yeo et al., 2012; Malykhin et al., 2008).

On both 1- and 7-month DTTs of the patient, we observed discontinuations of both cingulums above the genu of the corpus callosum. On 1-month DTT, both cingulums were connected to each Ch 5 bilaterally via the neural tracts that passed through the thalamus; in contrast, the left neural tract had disappeared on 7-month DTT and the right neural tract was connected to the right Ch 6 (Figure 1B).

In this study, we found unusual neural connections between the injured cingulums and the brainstem cholinergic nuclei in a patient with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The patient showed severe injury of both anterior cingulums on 1- and 7-month DTT. On 1-month DTT, the neural connections between the anterior portion of injured cingulums and Ch 5 were observed in both hemispheres. By contrast, on 7-month DTT, the left neural connection had disappeared and the right neural connection was connected to Ch 6 instead of Ch 5. These neural connections between the cingulum and the cholinergic nuclei were not observed in any of the control subjects. We assume that these neural connections resulted from an attempt for neural reorganization by the injured cingulum in order to obtain cholinergic innervation from the brainstem cholinergic nuclei after losing cholinergic innervation from cholinergic nuclei in the basal forebrain. The fact that the patient showed good cognition, including memory function, appears to be additional evidence for this assumption.

The brain has the characteristics of plasticity for reorganization following an injury. The basic mechanisms of brain plasticity are as follows: collateral sprouting from intact cells to a denervated region after normal input has been destroyed and unmasking of reserve axons and synapses for particular functions after failure of the normally dominant system (Bach-y-Rita, 1981; Bach y Rita, 1981). The fact that the unusual neural connections between the injured cingulum and brainstem were observed during early stage after onset on 1-month DTT might indicate that these connections were attributed to the unmasking of an already existing latent neural pathway rather than collateral sprouting. Further follow up studies from the acute stage to chronic stage after the onset of subarachnoid hemorrhage will be necessary in order to clarify this topic.

In conclusion, we report on a patient who showed unusual neural connections between the anterior portion of injured cingulums and the brainstem cholinergic nuclei. We believe that our findings may suggest one of the recovery mechanisms for cholinergic innervations of injured cingulums in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. A similar phenomenon was reported in a patient with traumatic brain injury, who showed a neural connection between the injured cingulum and Ch 5 (Yeo et al., 2012). Therefore, this is the first study to report on unusual neural connection in stroke patients. Further studies on the clinical significance of this unusual neural connection should be encouraged.

Footnotes

Funding: This study was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, No. 2012R1A1A4A01001873.

Copyedited by Kanat A, Jeong JH, Li CH, Song LP, Zhao M

References

  • [1].Bach-y-Rita P. Brain plasticity as a basis of the development of rehabilitation procedures for hemiplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1981;13:73–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Bach y, Rita P. Central nervous system lesions: sprouting and unmasking in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981;62:413–417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Concha L, Gross DW, Beaulieu C. Diffusion tensor tractography of the limbic system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2267–2274. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Hong JH, Jang SH. Neural pathway from nucleus basalis of Meynert passing through the cingulum in the human brain. Brain Res. 2010;1346:190–194. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Lucas-Meunier E1, Fossier P, Baux G, Amar M. Cholinergic modulation of the cortical neuronal network. Pflugers Arch. 2003;446:17–29. doi: 10.1007/s00424-002-0999-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Malykhin N, Concha L, Seres P, Beaulieu C, Coupland NJ. Diffusion tensor imaging tractography and reliability analysis for limbic and paralimbic white matter tracts. Psychiatry Res. 2008;164:132–142. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Marina RP MA, David J. Acetylcholine. In: Kenneth LD, Dennis C, Joseph TC, Charles N, editors. Neuropsychopharmacology: the fifth generation of progress: an official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Mesulam MM. Human brain cholinergic pathways. Prog Brain Res. 1990;84:231–241. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60908-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Mesulam MM, Mufson EJ, Wainer BH, Levey AI. Central cholinergic pathways in the rat: an overview based on an alternative nomenclature (Ch1-Ch6) Neuroscience. 1983;10:1185–1201. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(83)90108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Nieuwenhuys R, Voogd J, Huijzen Cv. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2008. The human central nervous system. [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Paxinos G. 3rd ed. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. The Rat Nervous System. [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Selden NR, Gitelman DR, Salamon-Murayama N, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM. Trajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain. Brain. 1998;121:2249–2257. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.12.2249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Stieltjes B, Kaufmann WE, van Zijl PC, Fredericksen K, Pearlson GD, Solaiyappan M, Mori S. Diffusion tensor imaging and axonal tracking in the human brainstem. Neuroimage. 2001;14:723–735. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Wainer BH, Steininger TL, Roback JD, Burke-Watson MA, Mufson EJ, Kordower J. Ascending cholinergic pathways: functional organization and implications for disease models. Prog Brain Res. 1993;98:9–30. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62378-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Wechsler D. New York: Psychological Corporation; 1981. Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-revised. [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Williams JM. Odessa, Fla: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1991. MAS: Memory Assessment Scales: professional manual. [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Woolf NJ, Butcher LL. Cholinergic systems in the rat brain: III. Projections from the pontomesencephalic tegmentum to the thalamus, tectum, basal ganglia, and basal forebrain. Brain Res Bull. 1986;16:603–637. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(86)90134-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Yeo SS, Chang MC, Kim SH, Son SM, Jang SH. Neural connection between injured cingulum and pedunculopontine nucleus in a patient with traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;31:143–146. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2012-0783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Yeo SS, Seo JP, Kwon YH, Jang SH. Precommissural fornix in the human brain: a diffusion tensor tractography study. Yonsei Med J. 2013;54:315–320. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Neural Regeneration Research are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES