Abstract
Interferons represent one of the first and essential host defense mechanisms after infection, and the activation of the IFN-pathway results in the transcriptional activation of hundreds of interferon-stimulated genes. The alpha-inducible protein 27 like 2A (Ifi27l2a) gene (human synonym: ISG12) is strongly up-regulated in the lung after influenza A infection in mice and has been shown in gene expression studies to be highly correlated to other activated genes. Therefore, we investigated the role of Ifi27l2a for the host defense to influenza A infections in more detail. RT-PCR analyses in non-infected mice demonstrated that Ifi27l2a was expressed in several tissues, including the lung. Detailed analyses of reporter gene expression in lungs from Ifi27l2a-LacZ mice revealed that Ifi27l2a was expressed in macrophages and lymphocytes but not in alveolar cells or bronchiolar epithelium cells. The number of macrophages and lymphocyte strongly increased in the lung after infection, but no significant increase in expression levels of the LacZ reporter gene was found within individual immune cells. Also, no reporter gene expression was found in bronchiolar epithelial cells, alveolar cells or infiltrating neutrophils after infection. Thus, up-regulation of Ifi27l2a in infected lungs is mainly due to the infiltration of macrophages and lymphocytes. Most surprisingly, deletion of Ifi27l2a in mouse knock-out lines did not result in increased susceptibility to infections with H1N1 or H7N7 influenza A virus compared to wild type C57BL/6N mice, suggesting a less important role of the gene for the host response to influenza infections than for bacterial infections.
Introduction
Every year, about 500 million people are infected by the influenza A virus worldwide, of which about 500,000 die [1]. In recent history, the emergence of new influenza subtypes has caused severe pandemics [2], [3], [4], the most severe one in 1918 caused about 30–50 million deaths worldwide [5]. Furthermore, a new variant of a seasonal H1N1 virus, pH1N1, caused a world-wide pandemic in 2009 [6], [7], [8]. In addition, the emergence of H5N1 and H7N9 underline the continuous thread of newly emerging subtypes that may cross species barriers and cause new pandemics in humans.
After infection with influenza A virus, the host activates a multitude of anti-viral responses to control virus replication, to activate the innate and adaptive immune response and eventually eliminate the pathogen. In the early phase, infected cells and immune cells detect specific pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) via membrane-associated and intracellular pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs). Activation of PRRs results in stimulation of signaling pathways that lead to transcriptional activation of early response genes, such as interferons, chemokines and cytokines (reviewed in [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]). The interferons represent one of the most important host defense mechanisms against viral infections. Ifnb1, Ifna and Ifn-λ genes belong to the type I and type III interferons, respectively, that are produced mainly in infected cells and in plasmacytoid dendritic cells [16] early after infection. They subsequently bind to specific receptors and activate the interferon signaling pathway in infected as well as neighboring cells (reviewed in e.g. [11], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]). Stimulation of the IFN pathway results in the transcriptional activation of hundreds of interferon-activated genes [23], [24], also referred to as ISG (interferon-stimulated) or IFI (interferon induced) genes. ISGs and IFIs establish an anti-viral state that protects cells from infection and replication of pathogens (reviewed in e.g. [21], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]). For some of the ISGs, the anti-viral function has been described, e.g. MX1, EIFAK2 (PKR, PRKR), IFITM3, ISG15, RSAD2 (Viperin), and OAS1 [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]. However, the functional role of the majority of ISGs remains to be elucidated.
In global lung transcriptome analysis of C57BL/6J mice and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) studies of pre-Collaborative Cross lines, the Ifi27l2a (alpha-inducible protein 27 like 2A) gene was found to be highly expressed after infection with influenza A virus [37], [38]. Gene expression studies and subsequent network analysis in lines of the pre-CC mouse population showed that Ifi27l2a was one of the genes exhibiting putative causative relationships with a large number of downstream connected genes [37]. The IFI27L2A protein is localized at the inner nuclear membrane in transfected cell lines [39], [40] where it sequesters and inhibits the function of the NR4A1 nuclear receptor. This in turn causes the down-regulation of NR4A1-target genes [40]. Other studies suggested that IFI27L2A represents a mitochondrial protein that sensitizes cells to apoptotic stimuli via mitochondrial membrane destabilization [41]. Ifi27l2a knock-out mice are more susceptible to bacterial infections [42].
Here, we investigated the expression and function of the IFN-induced Ifi27l2a gene during the course of influenza A virus infection. We describe the cell type-specific expression of Ifi27l2a in the lung and its role for the host defense to influenza A infections in Ifi27l2a knock-out mice. In the lungs of non-infected animals Ifi27l2a was strongly expressed in macrophages and also found in lymphocytes. After influenza infection a strong increase in overall expression levels of Ifi27l2a was observed in the lung. This increase was mainly due to infiltration of macrophages and lymphocytes. Ifi27l2a knock-out mice did not exhibit a more susceptible phenotype compared to wild type mice after infection with H1N1 or H7N7 influenza A virus.
Results
Ifi27l2a is expressed in several tissues and in lung leukocytes and increases after infection with influenza A virus
We first studied the expression of Ifi27l2a in non-infected mice. RT-PCR analyses detected transcripts in kidney, liver, lung, spleen and salivary gland whereas no expression was seen in heart (Figure S1 in File S1). We also re-analyzed previous microarray studies for global gene expression changes in the lung after influenza A infection [38]. Ifi27l2a was already expressed at a high level in lungs of non-infected mice and represents one of the most strongly up-regulated interferon-induced genes after infection. A strong increase in expression levels of Ifi27l2a was detected as early as two days post infection. Expression peaked from day 3 to day 8 post infection (p.i.) and then declined to baseline levels between day 14 and 18 p.i. (Figure S2 in File S1).
We further investigated Ifi27l2a gene expression at the cellular level using a Ifi27l2a knock-out mouse line that was generated by insertion of a LacZ reporter gene into the locus (Figure S3 in File S1). In this way, it was possible to follow transcriptional activation of the gene locus by studying expression of the reporter gene. After incubating lungs from Ifi27l2a-/- mice with the LacZ substrate X-Gal, blue staining was observed throughout the entire lung (Figure 1B) whereas no staining was observed in wild type animals (Figure 1A). In lung sections, expression of the LacZ reporter gene was observed in macrophages residing in alveolar regions of the lung (Figure 1C, D). No LacZ staining was seen in bronchi and bronchioli nor in blood vessels. After infection with influenza A virus PR8 (A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 [H1N1]) Ifi27l2a-/- mice exhibited more LacZ-positive macrophages at day 3 p.i. in alveolar regions (Figure 1E, F) whereas no staining was observed in peribronchial or in perivascular infiltrates (Figure 1E, F, arrows).
To further confirm these observations, we performed immunofluorescent staining of infected lungs from Ifi27l2a knock-out mice for macrophages, granulocytes or alveolar epithelial cells. We observed a co-localization of the LacZ-reporter gene together with CD11b antibodies confirming Ifi27l2a expression in macrophages (Figure 2). However, no co-expression of LacZ reporter gene and CD11b/Gr1 double-positive cells (representing granulocytes) was observed (Figure 2). Also, no co-localization with epithelial cell adhesion molecule (Epcam) could be detected (data not shown).
Furthermore, we determined the immune cell populations in lungs before and after infection using fluorescein di β-D-galactopyranoside (FDG) as substrate by flow cytometry. Reporter gene activity was observed in lung macrophages (Figure 3 A), T, B and NK cells (Figure 3B) in non-infected lungs. Within the leukocyte population, 59% of macrophages, 26% of B cells, 65% of T cells, and 28% of NK cells exhibited positive LacZ-staining, respectively (Table 1). After infection with influenza A virus, the total number of granulocytes and macrophages increased strongly after infection (Figure 4). The macrophage population increased on day 3 compared to non-infected controls from 13% to 32% (Table 1, Figure 3). The lymphocytic populations relatively decreased at this time. The percentage of LacZ-positive cells increased in the macrophage population from 59% to 85%, in the B cell population from 26% to 67%, in the T cell population from 65% to 76%, and in the NK cell population from 28% to 40%, respectively (Figure 3, Table 1). However, no augmentation of expression intensity was observed in macrophage, B cells and NK cell populations (see comparable MFI in most cell populations, Table 1). Only T cells displayed a slight increase in the mean fluorescence intensity (Figure 3B, right and Table 1) whereas all other populations revealed a decrease. We also compared the cellular infiltration by flow cytometry of wild type and Ifi27l2a knock-out mice on day 3 p.i. and in non-infected controls. We did not find any significant difference in resting or activated macrophages, granulocytes, NK cells, T cells or B cells (data not shown).
Table 1. Analysis of Ifi27l2a-LacZ reporter gene expression by flow cytometry.
Leuko (%) | FluoRep+ (%) | MFI | n | |
cell type | Macrophages (CD11bhigh) | |||
non-infected | 13 | 59 | 11800 | 3 |
infected | 32 | 85 | 8112 | 4 |
cell type | B cells (CD19) | |||
non-infected | 33 | 26 | 6891 | 3 |
infected | 24 | 67 | 6643 | 4 |
cell type | T cells (CD3) | |||
non-infected | 26 | 65 | 8213 | 3 |
infected | 15 | 76 | 10500 | 4 |
cell type | NK cells (NKp46) | |||
non-infected | 15 | 28 | 17850 | 2 |
infected | 20 | 40 | 6644 | 4 |
Lungs from infected and non-infected KO mice were harvested and homogenized as described in material and methods. After staining with specific antibodies for macrophages, B cells, T cells and NK cells the respective cell populations were analyzed for expression of the LacZ reporter gene using a fluorescent substrate (fluorescein di β-D-galactopyranoside, see material and methods for details). Leuko %: percentage of respective cell population (CD11bhigh, CD19, CD3 and NKp46) with respect to total leukocyte counts. Please note that the total percentages do not add up to 100% of the leucocytes since there are also immune cells that do not express any of the respective markers. FLuoRep+ %: percent of cells positive for the fluorescent substrate within the respective immune cell population. n: number of biological replicates per group. Median values are calculated for each group. MFI is the geometric mean of the Mean Fluorescence Intensity (here gated on the LacZ+ subpopulation of the respective cell type).
Ifi27l2a knock-out mice do not exhibit a more severe phenotype or increased viral load after influenza A infection
Next, we infected Ifi27l2a-/- knock-out mice with influenza A virus (PR8M, H1N1) to investigate if deletion of this gene resulted in increased susceptibility. Surprisingly, body weight loss as well as survival rate were not different from wild type mice (Figure 5A, B). Both genders, female and male mice were tested and no differences to control mice were observed (data not shown). In addition, viral loads in the lungs were not significantly different in wild type versus knock-out mice (Figure 5C). Furthermore, we ascertained body weight and survival after infection with H7N7 influenza A virus subtype (A/Seal/Massachusetts/1/1980 H7N7, SC35M). No significant differences were observed (Figure S4 in File S1) of Ifi27l2a-/- mice and controls. Immunohistochemical staining for influenza A virus in lungs from PR8 infected mice showed replication of virus in the bronchial epithelium at day 2 p.i. and also in alveolar regions at day 5 p.i. to the same extend in Ifi27l2a-/- and wild type mice (Figure S5 in File S1). H&E staining of lung sections revealed tissue destruction of epithelial cell layers and first infiltrating immune cells, mostly granulocytes, in peribronchial, perivascular and alveolar regions at day 2 p.i. in wild type mice (Figure S6A in File S1). The same phenotype was observed for Ifi27l2a-/- mutant mice (Figure S6D in File S1). At day 5 p.i., destruction of the epithelial layer and sloughing of cells into the lumen in many bronchioli as well as massive infiltrates of immune cells, including lymphoid cells, were observed in all regions of the lung. However, no obvious differences were detectable between wild type and Ifi27l2a-/- mice (Figure S6B, E, respectively in File S1). At day 8 p.i. only some sloughing of dead cells into bronchiolar lumen was seen in wild type mice but was still frequently found in Ifi27l2a-/- mutant mice. Infiltration of lymphoid immune cells was massive at day 8 p.i. in both wild type and knock-out mice (Figure S6C, F, respectively in File S1).
Discussion
We studied expression of Ifi27l2a by RT-PCR and detected transcripts in kidney, liver, lung, spleen, and salivary gland. These results corroborate and extend previous microarray studies demonstrating expression of Ifi27l2a in salivary gland, adrenal gland, adipose tissues, spleen, lymph nodes, B cells and macrophages (GEO database record GSE10246). For a more detailed analysis of gene expression patterns at the cellular level, we used an Ifi27l2a-targeted allele in which the LacZ reporter was inserted into the Ifi27l2a locus. This allele allowed us to follow Ifi27l2a-positive cells directly in tissue sections and by flow cytometry. We concentrated on the lung tissue, since we were mainly interested in regulation of the Ifi27l2a gene before and after influenza A infection.
In non-infected mice, reporter gene activity could be detected in macrophages in the alveolar regions of the lung by histochemical analysis. Flow cytometric studies revealed expression of the Ifi27l2a-driven LacZ reporter gene in macrophages and also in T, B and to a marginal extend NK cells. After infection with influenza A virus, Ifi27l2a expression strongly increased in the whole lung [38], [43]. At the same time, the number of recruited immune cells increased in the infected lungs. However, no up-regulation of reporter gene expression was seen within individual cells of any type. We thus conclude that the total increase observed for Ifi27l2a transcripts in the whole lung after infection is mainly due to infiltration of Ifi27l2a expressing macrophages and lymphocytes but not to up-regulation of Ifi27l2a within individual cells.
Furthermore, no LacZ expression was observed in alveolar or bronchiolar epithelial cells. Immunofluorescent studies confirmed expression of LacZ reporter in alveolar macrophages and no expression in neutrophils. Although we did not detect LacZ expression in alveolar and bronchiolar epithelial cells, we have to note a strong cross-reactivity of the anti-ß-galactosidase antibody with endogenous ß-galactosidase, especially in bronchiolar cells [44], and therefore we cannot exclude a low level of Ifi27l2a expression in these cells. In summary, these results suggest that Ifi27l2a is neither expressed in infected epithelial cells nor in neighboring epithelial cells or granulocytes near infected areas. Expression of Ifi27l2a was not detectable in lymphocytes in histological studies but with the more sensitive method of flow cytometry. Therefore, infiltrating macrophages plus lymphocytes are the main source of increased Ifi27l2a expression in the lung.
In our in vivo studies, Ifi27l2a was neither induced to detectable levels in the infected bronchiolar epithelial cells nor in alveolar cells. These observations are different from in vitro studies showing that Ifi27l2a was strongly induced after treatment of cell lines and primary cell cultures with interferon, including vascular smooth muscle cells and a monocyte cell line [40]. Similarly, Wang et al. [45] and Ionnidis et al. [46] described the expression of genes, including Ifi27l2a, after influenza infection in differentiated AECII cells in vitro. However, up-regulation of Ifi27l2a in cultured cell lines after infection or interferon treatment may not necessarily mean that the gene is induced directly by interferons. Many chemokines and cytokines are also up-regulated, and therefore, the activation of ifi27l2a gene expression may well be explained by a secondary stimulation via other chemokines and cytokines. Innoidis et al. [46] also reported that peripheral blood monocytes from patients with acute influenza A or RSV respiratory bronchitis express Ifi27l2a. These observations are well in agreement with our results.
Furthermore, Mx1 (myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1), an ISG which is directly activated by type I and III interferons [47], is mainly expressed in bronchiolar epithelial cells after influenza A infection. No Mx1 expression was observed in macrophages [48]. These observations suggest that the main interferon production and activation of ISGs that are directly regulated by interferons after influenza A infection occurs in the bronchiolar epithelium. Infection of epithelial cells results in the secretion of long-range signaling molecules which in turn triggers the recruitment of Ifi27l2a-positive leukocytes to the infected lung. The increase in cell numbers of these cell populations constitutively expressing Ifi27l2a leads to the observed increase in the Ifi27l2a transcript levels in the lung. This scenario may be different in other tissues or after infections with different pathogens.
It should also be noted that Ifi27l2a-specific antibodies are not available and that only expression of the LacZ reporter gene can be followed. Thus, we cannot exclude that the LacZ reporter gene may not fully reproduce the expression of the endogenous gene locus. Also, we did not measure protein levels and we can thus not exclude regulation at the post-transcriptional or post-translational level. We also note that we cannot exclude low levels of expression that may be missed by our methods. For a final formal proof, more experiments using Ifi27l2a antibody staining or in situ hybridization studies would be necessary.
Previous reports describe the analysis of Ifi27l2a knock-out mice with respect to cardio-vascular disease [40] or bacterial sepsis [42]. However, Ifi27l2a deficient mice have not yet been studied in the context of viral infections. The original Ifi27l2a-/- mice were generated and maintained on a mixed background (50% 129S/v and 50% Swiss Webster, [40]). Since the 129 background itself renders mice highly susceptible to influenza A infections [49], we generated a new mutant line on a C57BL/6N background using a KOMP targeted ES cell line. Most surprisingly, Ifi27l2a-/- mutant mice did not exhibit an increased susceptibility to influenza A infections as one would expect based on previous transcriptome and network analyses [37]. The most likely explanation is that a large number of IFN-induced genes are activated after influenza A infection and that there is functional redundancy between them. Similar observations have been obtained in knock-out mice in which one of interferon receptors have been mutated. Deletion of the interferon type I receptor Ifnar1 alone leads only to a moderate increase in susceptibility whereas deletion of both Ifnar1 (interferon (alpha and beta) receptor 1) and the Ifnlr1 (Il28ra, interferon lambda receptor 1) gene strongly increased susceptibility to influenza infections [48], [50].
Deletion of the Ifi27l2a gene renders knock-out mice more susceptible to septic shock after bacterial infection [42]. This is noteworthy in the context of our results where we did not observe an increased susceptibility to influenza A virus infections. These findings may be explained by the fact that during bacterial infections macrophages play important roles in the host defense, especially for sepsis [51], [52], [53].
In conclusion, our in vivo studies shed new light on the regulation and function of Ifi27l2a during influenza infections of the lung which were unexpected based on previous in vitro studies. We demonstrated that Ifi27l2a is expressed in immune cells of the lung before and after infection and that the increase in total expression levels after infection is mainly due to the constitutively expression of infiltrating immune cells. Furthermore, analysis of Ifi27l2a knock-out mice revealed no increased susceptibility to influenza virus suggesting a network of ISGs with redundant biological functions of the host response to influenza infections.
Material and Methods
Ethics statement
All experiments in mice were approved by an external committee according to the national guidelines of the animal welfare law in Germany (BGBl. I S. 1206, 1313 and BGBl. I S. 1934). The protocol used in these experiments has been reviewed by an ethics committee and approved by the ‘Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Oldenburg, Germany’ (Permit Number: 33.9.42502-04-051/09).
Virus, mice and plasmids
Original stocks of viruses were obtained from Stefan Ludwig, University of Münster (PR8, A/PuertoRico/8/34 H1N1, Münster variant, as described in [54]) and from Peter Stäheli, University of Freiburg (A/Seal/Massachusetts/1/1980 H7N7, SC35M [55]). Virus stocks were prepared by infection of 10-day-old embryonated chicken eggs as described in [56]. The Ifi27l2a knock-out mouse strain (C57BL/6NTac-Ifi27l2atm1(KOMP)Vlcg) used for this research project was created from ES cell clone 10949A-H8, obtained from the KOMP Repository (www.komp.org)). Methods used for generation of KOMP mice have been published previously [57]. Animals were maintained under specific pathogen free conditions at the animal facility of the HZI in Braunschweig. Homozygous mutant mice were genotyped by PCR analysis and then used for infections. For genotyping, a set of three primers was used which generate a 348 bp fragment for homozygous mutant and heterozygous mice and a 557 bp band for heterozygous and wild type mice, respectively. Primer sequences used as forward primer: GACAGAGTTCAGGAAAGATG, and as reverse primers LacZRev GTCTGTCCTAGCTTCCTCACTG and Ifi27l2a inrev ACATTCATCTACTTGCTGCTC.
RNA isolation, purification and RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was prepared from lungs using the RNeasy Midi Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocol. Samples containing 500 ng of total RNA were then digested with DNase I (to remove any DNA in the preparation) and cDNA was synthetized using the BioscriptTM (Bioline GmbH, Germany). Subsequently, Taq polymerase (Genecraft Germany) and gene-specific primers (Table S1 in File S1) were used for PCR amplification. Amplified fragments were analyzed on a 1% agarose gel.
Infection of mice and measurement of body weight loss and survival
For infection experiments, female and male mice at the age of 12–14 weeks were anesthetized by intra-peritoneal injection of Ketamin-Xylazine (5% each) solution in sterile NaCl (100 mg/ml Ketamine, WDT, Garbsen, Germany; 20 mg/ml Xylazine, Bayer Health-Care, Leverkusen) with a dose adjusted to the individual body weight (200 µl/20 g body weight). Infection was performed by intranasal application of virus solution in 20 µl of sterile phosphate-buffered saline. Subsequently survival and body weight loss were monitored until day 14 p.i. In addition to mice that were found dead, mice with a weight loss of more than 30% of the starting body weight were euthanized and recorded as dead.
Determining of infectious viral particles
Viral load in infected lungs was determined on MDCK (Madin-Darby Canine Kidney) cells using the FFU assay as described [54]. Detection limit of the assay is at 40 infectious particles/lung. Thus, for samples where no virus was detected, the data points were set to 40 FFU/lung. For determination of viral load, lungs of mice were homogenized in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 0.1% BSA using the Poly Tron 2100 homogenizer. Debris was removed by centrifugation. The samples were stored in aliquots at −70°C. Serial 10-fold dilutions of lung homogenates in DMEM containing 0.1% BSA were prepared and viral titers determined by the FFU assay.
Analysis of LacZ reporter gene expression in tissue sections
Whole organs of Ifi27l2a-/- and wild type mice were fixed with 0.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 15 minutes at room temperature, washed twice with PBS, and then stained overnight at 37°C in staining solution containing 1 mg/ml X-gal (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide (Sigma Aldrich). Cryo-sectioning (10 µm) and subsequent LacZ staining were performed as described previously [58]. In brief, sections were fixed in 0,5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde/PBS for 10 minutes at 4°C, washed in 1 mM MgCl2/PBS and stained over night at 37°C in staining solution containing 1 mg/ml X-gal (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide (Sigma Aldrich). The slides were counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red (Sigma) for 1 minute at room temperature.
Histological, immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence analyses
Lungs were prepared and immersion-fixed for 24 hours in 4% buffered formaldehyde solution (pH 7.4), dehydrated in a series of graded ethanol and embedded in paraffin. Sections (0.5 µm) were cut from five evenly distributed levels of the paraffin blocks and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. For immunohistochemical studies, sections were stained with a polyclonal primary antibody (against influenza A H1N1 virions; Virostat) overnight at 4°C and subsequently tissue sections were incubated for 30 min with the secondary antibody (rabbit anti-goat-biotin; KPL; Gaithersburg, Madison, USA) and counterstained with haematoxylin. For immunofluorescence diagnosis 12 µm cryo-sections were air-dried, fixed in acetone at −20°C and rehydrated in PBS. Slides were blocked with 2% BSA in PBS and stained with following antibodies. Primary antibodies used were: Biotin anti-CD11b (1∶200, clone M1/70, Siegfried Weiß, HZI), anti-beta Galactosidase (1∶200, Abcam). Fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies used were: Streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 488 (1∶200, Invitrogen), Anti-Mouse Ly-6G (Gr1) eFluor 660 (1∶200, eBiosciences), Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-chicken IgY H&L (1∶500, Abcam) and APC anti-mouse CD326 (Epcam) (1∶200, BioLegend). After staining slides were washed with PBS, dried and mounted with Neo-Mount (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Analyses were performed using a Zeiss LSM510 laser scanning microscope with a 40× oil immersion objective. Appropriate negative controls without the primary antibodies were performed and no immunofluorescence was detected but a strong cross-reaction of the anti-beta-galactosidase antibody with endogenous beta-galactosidase was observed in bronchial epithelial cells.
Flow cytometry
Lungs from mice were harvested and homogenized by passing through a 100 µm cell strainer (Becton Dickinson) and resuspended in PBS followed by a density centrifugation with lympholyte M (Cedarlane Laboratories) at RT. The interphase was extracted and washed with PBS/3%FCS buffer. Cells were processed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Molecular Probes, FluoReporter lacZ Flow Cytometry Kit): Cells were resuspended in 100 µl “staining medium” (PBS, 4%FCS, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.2) and incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes. In parallel “working solution” including fluorescein di β-D-galactopyranoside (FDG), 2 mM in ddH2O, has to be incubated at 37°C for 10 minutes. An equal amount of “working solution” has to be added to the cell suspension and was incubated for 2 minutes at 37°C. FDG loading was stopped by 1∶10 dilution with ice cold “staining medium” including 1.5 µm propidium iodide. Cells were kept on ice during the subsequent staining procedure: Monoclonal antibodies (α-NKp46 PerCp eFluor710, α-CD3 Alexa 647, α-CD19 APC, α-CD11b, α-CD45 FITC, α-F4/80 PerCP) were added to the respective cell suspensions after blocking unspecific binding with 2.4G2 (α-CD16/32), incubated 30 minutes at 4°C washed twice with “staining medium” and measured on an Accuri C6 (Becton Dickinson) or a FACScalibur (Becton Dickinson). Cells from non-infected wild-type mice did not reveal any significant staining (data not shown). Further detailed analyses were performed with FlowJo 7.6.4.
Statistical analysis
For statistical analysis, GraphPad Prism 5.0 software was used. Results were presented as means ± SEM. Statistical significance between groups were determined using the Mann-Whitney U test for body weight loss curves. The log-rank test was used to determine significant differences of the survival curves.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by intra-mural grants from the Helmholtz-Association (Program Infection and Immunity) the research grants FluResearchNet (No. 01KI07137) and ‘Infection challenge in the German Mouse Clinic’ from the German Ministry of Education and Research to KS. MT was supported by a fellowship from the Deutsche Akademische Austauschdienst (DAAD) and by a German-Egyptian Research Long-term Scholarship (GERLS, award no. A/10/92653). We would like to thank the animal caretakers at the Central Animal Facilities at the HZI for maintaining the mice for this study, Karin Lammert and Anna Rinkel for excellent technical assistance, Peter Stäheli and Stefan Ludwig for providing the original stocks of influenza A viruses.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by intra-mural grants from the Helmholtz-Association (Program Infection and Immunity) the research grants FluResearchNet (No. 01KI07137) and ‘Infection challenge in the German Mouse Clinic’ from the German Ministry of Education and Research to KS. MT was supported by a fellowship from the Deutsche Akademische Austauschdienst (DAAD) and by a German-Egyptian Research Long-term Scholarship (GERLS, award no. A/10/92653). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Fauci AS (2006) Seasonal and pandemic influenza preparedness: science and countermeasures. J Infect Dis 194 Suppl 2 S73–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kilbourne ED (2006) Influenza pandemics of the 20th century. Emerg Infect Dis 12: 9–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Klenk HD, Garten W, Matrosovich M (2011) Molecular mechanisms of interspecies transmission and pathogenicity of influenza viruses: Lessons from the 2009 pandemic. Bioessays 33: 180–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Russell CJ, Webster RG (2005) The genesis of a pandemic influenza virus. Cell 123: 368–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Johnson NP, Mueller J (2002) Updating the accounts: global mortality of the 1918–1920 "Spanish" influenza pandemic. Bull Hist Med 76: 105–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fraser C, Donnelly CA, Cauchemez S, Hanage WP, Van Kerkhove MD, et al. (2009) Pandemic potential of a strain of influenza A (H1N1): early findings. Science 324: 1557–1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Neumann G, Noda T, Kawaoka Y (2009) Emergence and pandemic potential of swine-origin H1N1 influenza virus. Nature 459: 931–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Wang TT, Palese P (2009) Unraveling the mystery of swine influenza virus. Cell 137: 983–985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Takeuchi O, Akira S (2009) Innate immunity to virus infection. Immunol Rev 227: 75–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Pichlmair A, Reis eSC (2007) Innate recognition of viruses. Immunity 27: 370–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Haller O, Weber F (2009) The interferon response circuit in antiviral host defense. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg 71: 73–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kato A, Schleimer RP (2007) Beyond inflammation: airway epithelial cells are at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 19: 711–720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kohlmeier JE, Woodland DL (2009) Immunity to respiratory viruses. Annu Rev Immunol 27: 61–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Julkunen I, Melen K, Nyqvist M, Pirhonen J, Sareneva T, et al. (2000) Inflammatory responses in influenza A virus infection. Vaccine 19 Suppl 1 S32–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Julkunen I, Sareneva T, Pirhonen J, Ronni T, Melen K, et al. (2001) Molecular pathogenesis of influenza A virus infection and virus-induced regulation of cytokine gene expression. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 12: 171–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Davidson S, Crotta S, McCabe TM, Wack A (2014) Pathogenic potential of interferon alphabeta in acute influenza infection. Nat Commun 5: 3864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Liu SY, Sanchez DJ, Cheng G (2011) New developments in the induction and antiviral effectors of type I interferon. Curr Opin Immunol 23: 57–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Borden EC, Sen GC, Uze G, Silverman RH, Ransohoff RM, et al. (2007) Interferons at age 50: past, current and future impact on biomedicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6: 975–990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Pestka S, Krause CD, Walter MR (2004) Interferons, interferon-like cytokines, and their receptors. Immunol Rev 202: 8–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Platanias LC (2005) Mechanisms of type-I- and type-II-interferon-mediated signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 375–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Takaoka A, Yanai H (2006) Interferon signalling network in innate defence. Cell Microbiol 8: 907–922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Taniguchi T, Ogasawara K, Takaoka A, Tanaka N (2001) IRF family of transcription factors as regulators of host defense. Annu Rev Immunol 19: 623–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. de Veer MJ, Holko M, Frevel M, Walker E, Der S, et al. (2001) Functional classification of interferon-stimulated genes identified using microarrays. J Leukoc Biol 69: 912–920. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. MacMicking JD (2012) Interferon-inducible effector mechanisms in cell-autonomous immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 12: 367–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Diamond MS, Farzan M (2013) The broad-spectrum antiviral functions of IFIT and IFITM proteins. Nat Rev Immunol 13: 46–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Sadler AJ, Williams BR (2008) Interferon-inducible antiviral effectors. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 559–568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zhou X, Michal JJ, Zhang L, Ding B, Lunney JK, et al. (2013) Interferon induced IFIT family genes in host antiviral defense. Int J Biol Sci 9: 200–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Haller O, Staeheli P, Kochs G (2009) Protective role of interferon-induced Mx GTPases against influenza viruses. Rev Sci Tech 28: 219–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lim JK, Lisco A, McDermott DH, Huynh L, Ward JM, et al. (2009) Genetic variation in OAS1 is a risk factor for initial infection with West Nile virus in man. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Moritoh K, Yamauchi H, Asano A, Yoshii K, Kariwa H, et al. (2009) Generation of congenic mouse strains by introducing the virus-resistant genes, Mx1 and Oas1b, of feral mouse-derived inbred strain MSM/Ms into the common strain C57BL/6J. Jpn J Vet Res 57: 89–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Everitt AR, Clare S, Pertel T, John SP, Wash RS, et al. (2012) IFITM3 restricts the morbidity and mortality associated with influenza. Nature 484(7395): 519–523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Feeley EM, Sims JS, John SP, Chin CR, Pertel T, et al. (2011) IFITM3 inhibits influenza A virus infection by preventing cytosolic entry. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bergmann M, Garcia-Sastre A, Carnero E, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, et al. (2000) Influenza virus NS1 protein counteracts PKR-mediated inhibition of replication. J Virol 74: 6203–6206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Yang YL, Reis LF, Pavlovic J, Aguzzi A, Schafer R, et al. (1995) Deficient signaling in mice devoid of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase. EMBO J 14: 6095–6106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lai C, Struckhoff JJ, Schneider J, Martinez-Sobrido L, Wolff T, et al. (2009) Mice lacking the ISG15 E1 enzyme UbE1L demonstrate increased susceptibility to both mouse-adapted and non-mouse-adapted influenza B virus infection. J Virol 83: 1147–1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Fitzgerald KA (2011) The interferon inducible gene: Viperin. J Interferon Cytokine Res 31: 131–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Bottomly D, Ferris MT, Aicher LD, Rosenzweig E, Whitmore A, et al. (2012) Expression quantitative trait Loci for extreme host response to influenza a in pre-collaborative cross mice. G3 (Bethesda) 2: 213–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Pommerenke C, Wilk E, Srivastava B, Schulze A, Novoselova N, et al. (2012) Global transcriptome analysis in influenza-infected mouse lungs reveals the kinetics of innate and adaptive host immune responses. PLoS ONE 7: e41169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Martensen PM, Sogaard TM, Gjermandsen IM, Buttenschon HN, Rossing AB, et al. (2001) The interferon alpha induced protein ISG12 is localized to the nuclear membrane. Eur J Biochem 268: 5947–5954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Papac-Milicevic N, Breuss JM, Zaujec J, Ryban L, Plyushch T, et al. (2012) The interferon stimulated gene 12 inactivates vasculoprotective functions of NR4A nuclear receptors. Circ Res 110: e50–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Cheriyath V, Leaman DW, Borden EC (2011) Emerging roles of FAM14 family members (G1P3/ISG 6-16 and ISG12/IFI27) in innate immunity and cancer. J Interferon Cytokine Res 31: 173–181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Uhrin P, Perkmann T, Binder B, Schabbauer G (2013) ISG12 is a critical modulator of innate immune responses in murine models of sepsis. Immunobiology 218: 1207–1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Toapanta FR, Ross TM (2009) Impaired immune responses in the lungs of aged mice following influenza infection. Respir Res 10: 112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Weiss DJ, Liggitt D, Clark JG (1997) In situ histochemical detection of beta-galactosidase activity in lung: assessment of X-Gal reagent in distinguishing lacZ gene expression and endogenous beta-galactosidase activity. Hum Gene Ther 8: 1545–1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wang J, Nikrad MP, Phang T, Gao B, Alford T, et al. (2011) Innate immune response to influenza A virus in differentiated human alveolar type II cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 45: 582–591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Ioannidis I, McNally B, Willette M, Peeples ME, Chaussabel D, et al. (2012) Plasticity and virus specificity of the airway epithelial cell immune response during respiratory virus infection. J Virol 86: 5422–5436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Haller O, Staeheli P, Kochs G (2007) Interferon-induced Mx proteins in antiviral host defense. Biochimie 89: 812–818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Mordstein M, Neugebauer E, Ditt V, Jessen B, Rieger T, et al. (2010) Lambda interferon renders epithelial cells of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts resistant to viral infections. J Virol 84: 5670–5677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Srivastava B, Blazejewska P, Hessmann M, Bruder D, Geffers R, et al. (2009) Host genetic background strongly influences the response to influenza a virus infections. PLoS ONE 4: e4857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Mordstein M, Kochs G, Dumoutier L, Renauld JC, Paludan SR, et al. (2008) Interferon-lambda contributes to innate immunity of mice against influenza A virus but not against hepatotropic viruses. PLoS Pathog 4: e1000151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Murray PJ, Wynn TA (2011) Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 723–737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Rittirsch D, Flierl MA, Ward PA (2008) Harmful molecular mechanisms in sepsis. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 776–787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Benoit M, Desnues B, Mege JL (2008) Macrophage polarization in bacterial infections. J Immunol 181: 3733–3739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Blazejewska P, Koscinski L, Viegas N, Anhlan D, Ludwig S, et al. (2011) Pathogenicity of different PR8 influenza A virus variants in mice is determined by both viral and host factors. Virology 412: 36–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Gabriel G, Dauber B, Wolff T, Planz O, Klenk HD, et al. (2005) The viral polymerase mediates adaptation of an avian influenza virus to a mammalian host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 18590–18595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Wilk E, Schughart K (2012) The mouse as model system to study host-pathogen interactions in influenza A infections. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol 2: 177–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Skarnes WC, Rosen B, West AP, Koutsourakis M, Bushell W, et al. (2011) A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature 474: 337–342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Limberis M, Bell P, Wilson JM (2007) Detection of reporter gene expression in murine airways. Methods Mol Biol 411: 25–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.