Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroendocrinol. 2013 Nov;25(11):1024–1031. doi: 10.1111/jne.12055

Recent evidence for rapid synthesis and action of estrogens during auditory processing in a songbird

Luke Remage-Healey 1,*, Sung D Jeon 1, Narendra R Joshi 1
PMCID: PMC4153829  NIHMSID: NIHMS496934  PMID: 23746380

Abstract

It is now clear that estrogens are not just circulating reproductive hormones, but that they also have neurotransmitter-like properties in a wide range of brain circuits. The view of estrogens as intrinsic neuromodulators that shape behavior has been bolstered by a series of recent developments from multiple vertebrate model systems. Here, we review several recent findings from studies of songbirds showing how the identified neural circuits that govern auditory processing and sensorimotor integration are modulated by the local and acute production of estrogens. First, studies using in vivo microdialysis demonstrate that estrogens fluctuate in auditory cortex (30-min time bin resolution) when songbirds are hearing song and interacting with conspecifics. Second, estrogens rapidly boost the auditory-evoked activity of neurons in the same auditory cortical region, enhancing auditory processing. Third, local pharmacological blockade of estrogen signaling in this region impairs auditory neuronal responsiveness as well as behavioral song preferences. Fourth, the rapid estrogen actions that occur within the auditory cortex can propagate upstream (transsynaptically) to sensorimotor circuits to enhance the neural representation of song. Lastly, we present new evidence that the receptor for the rapid actions of estradiol is likely in neuronal membranes, and that traditional nuclear estrogen receptor agonists do not mimic these rapid actions. Broadly speaking, many of these findings are observed in both males and females, emphasizing the fundamental importance of estrogens in neural circuit function. Together, these and other emergent studies provide support for rapid, brain-derived estrogen signaling in regulating sensorimotor integration, learning and perception.

Keywords: Neuroestrogen, neurosteroid, estradiol, electrophysiology, microdialysis

I. Introduction

This review emerged as part of a symposium on “Mechanisms of rapid regulation of behavior by estrogens” presented in February 2013, at the 7th International Meeting on Steroids and the Nervous System in Torino, Italy. Here, we consider recent developments and some unpublished data on the topic of acute synthesis and action of estrogens in the auditory cortex of songbirds. This review is therefore more limited in scope as compared to several recent reviews that are complimentary to and overlapping with information presented here, and these excellent sources should be consulted for more comprehensive treatment of this and related work (1-6).

The songbird brain contains a well-characterized network of nuclei that govern song learning, auditory processing, and the motor act of singing itself. These behaviors have overlapping representations in the songbird brain (i.e. the ‘song system’), owing to the strong functional and anatomical links between learning, audition and song motor output (7-17). It is well established that the song system is highly sensitive to treatment with androgens and estrogens, and that the song system exhibits widespread expression of both androgen receptors and estrogen receptors (6, 18-26). The developmental maturation and seasonal activation of song system nuclei are each dependent on steroid hormone mechanisms, typically from peripheral androgen sources (21, 27-34). There is also increasing evidence that a substantial amount of estrogens can be synthesized directly in the songbird brain, especially in males. All of the enzymes necessary for the de novo production of estrogens from cholesterol are expressed in the ‘song system’ (20, 30, 35-42), and the brain itself is both the primary source and target of estrogens in male songbirds (43).

In songbirds, both anatomical and biochemical characterization of the aromatase enzyme, which synthesizes active estrogens from androgen precursors, show that some regions of the song system are capable of substantial estrogen production (36, 38, 41). In songbirds and other vertebrates, aromatase is expressed in neuronal cell bodies as well as in presynaptic boutons (41, 44, 45). This separation of aromatase into two subcellular compartments may have functional consequences for the way estrogen synthesis is controlled in neurons. It is clear that androgen precursors can be converted into estrogens for long-term seasonal or organizational actions, and this may be a primary role for the aromatase found in neuronal cell bodies. In some areas, the additional expression of aromatase in presynaptic boutons suggests that estrogens can be synthesized in a highly-restricted spatial and temporal manner at the level of individual synapses (41, 44, 45). This has raised the specter of a precise delivery mechanism for estrogens at ‘synaptocrine’ targets, although the extent of spatial and temporal specificity of this mechanism remains an open question (2, 4, 46).

Recent tests of this ‘synaptocrine’ signaling hypothesis have shown that presynaptic terminals in the songbird brain are capable of synthesizing estrogens (45, 47, 48). The mechanisms by which this ‘synaptocrine’ estrogen delivery mechanism is controlled have recently begun to emerge, based on convergent evidence in the songbird and quail model systems (49-51). Specifically, either glutamate- or potassium-evoked excitation of the auditory forebrain leads to acute suppression of local estradiol levels, as measured by in vivo microdialysis (52, 53). Second, in the presence of omega conotoxin (a specific presynaptic voltage-gated calcium channel blocker) the potassium-evoked suppression of local estradiol levels in the auditory forebrain is blocked (53). Third, in synaptosomes prepared from the songbird brain, the enzymatic activity of aromatase itself is rapidly suppressed by phosphorylating conditions, and more potently in the synaptosomal fraction than in the microsomal fraction (54). Therefore, in some cases estrogen signaling can be independently controlled at the level of presynaptic terminals to achieve very high temporal and spatial precision. This estrogen signaling mechanism at presynaptic terminals aligns well with the precision of rapid actions of estrogens on neuronal activity and morphology. Notably among these is the well-documented rapid action of estrogens on dendritic spines in the rodent hippocampus (55-57). Below, we review a related line of work in birds showing that rapid estrogen signaling in the brain has direct consequences for auditory processing and sensorimotor integration.

II. Measurement of fluctuating brain estrogens

If estrogens can act as rapid, local modulators, then acute changes in estrogen synthesis or brain estrogen content should be detectable. As described above, one means of detecting rapid changes in estrogen synthesis is via measuring the enzymatic activity of aromatase (i.e., activity that directly reflects the biochemical conversion of androgen precursors into active estrogens). Several groups have presented evidence for the rapid regulation of aromatase in brain. In quail hypothalamic explants, the activity of aromatase is rapidly and reversibly inhibited by potassium-or glutamate-evoked excitation and calcium-dependent phosphorylating conditions (51, 58). There is also strong evidence that quail hypothalamic aromatase activity is rapidly regulated in vivo by sexual interactions (3, 59, 60) and acute stress (61-63). In territorial white-crowned sparrows, brief territorial challenges are associated with no changes in aromatase activity but lead to acute suppression of estradiol in several behaviorally-important brain regions (including hypothalamusand hippocampus), as assessed using tissue micropunches (64). In teleost fish, brain aromatase activity is suppressed during socially-induced changes in aggression and gonadal sex in bluebanded gobies (65) and rapid aromatization is associated with increased sexual motivation in goldfish (66). Lastly, pharmacological inhibition of aromatase in the brain can acutely disrupt sexual behavior in mice (67) and territoriality in songbirds (68). Therefore, evidence from several representative vertebrate species shows that acute changes in brain estrogen synthesis are associated with acute changes in behavior.

An alternative means of detecting rapid changes in estrogen synthesis is via measuring the fluctuations in brain estrogens directly. In vivo microdialysis for estradiol has been validated to quantify changes in estradiol levels in the CNS of awake, behaving songbirds (52). These experiments have focused primarily on a region of the songbird brain that is analogous to mammalian secondary auditory cortex, the caudomedial nidopallium (NCM). The NCM is relatively large, and is enriched in both somal and presynaptic aromatase expression (23, 41, 45), making it especially suited to in vivo microdialysis. Due to limits in detection, sampling intervals in published work to date has been limited to 30-min time bins for quantifying estradiol fluctuations. In male zebra finches, local levels of estradiol in the NCM increase during social interactions with females (when males are typically singing) and when males are exposed to artificial playback of zebra finch songs, but not control sounds (52).

Female zebra finches also exhibit a similar elevation in NCM estradiol levels when hearing male zebra finch song (69), suggesting that basic mechanisms of auditory processing are dependent upon the acute, local production of estrogens. Ongoing experiments are testing the extent to which the acute, song-dependent elevation in estradiol levels in NCM is dependent on social and/or contextual cues in both males and female zebra finches. Some ‘classic’ neuromodulators such as dopamine and arginine vasotocin (AVT) can encode the salience or behavioral valence (i.e. positive vs. negative) of social stimuli (e.g., 70, 71), but it is unclear whether rapid fluctuations in brain estrogens are similarly sensitive to stimulus salience and/or valence. . It is also unclear at present what mechanism may provide a ‘stop signal’ for rapid estrogen synthesis and release (in order to preserve the spatiotemporal fidelity of acute modulatory actions), similar to the reuptake/degradation mechanisms that have been identified for classical neuromodulators (72, 73).

III. Modulation of auditory processing and behavior by local estrogens

The acute fluctuations in local levels of estrogens in the songbird NCM stimulated interest in the rapid actions of estrogens on NCM neuronal activity, as well as behaviors supported by NCM. Electrophysiology and immediate early gene studies have identified the NCM as an auditory processing region, specifically analogous to supragranular layers of the auditory cortex in mammals (74-79). To test for rapid actions of estrogens on NCM neurons, two complimentary approaches have been used to manipulate estrogen signaling, reverse dialysis and pressure delivery, and each of these have been coupled with extracellular recordings of the activity of nearby neurons within the NCM (80)(81). Findings using these independent approaches have been largely convergent, in that rapid elevations in NCM estrogens cause rapid increases (5-30 min) in the auditory-evoked activity of NCM neurons, in both male and female zebra finches (69, 80-82). Importantly, reverse dialysis or pressure infusion of aromatase antagonists cause acute decreases in the auditory-evoked activity of NCM neurons. Therefore, endogenous estrogen signaling appears to exert acute, enhancing effects on auditory processing in NCM.

Similar manipulations of estrogen signaling in NCM have been carried out while male zebra finches were engaged in auditory preference behavioral tasks. These tasks rely on the expression of phonotaxis (physical proximity to a speaker) for familiar songs as compared to unfamiliar songs in adult zebra finches (83, 84). Reverse dialysis of the aromatase inhibitor fadrozole (FAD) into the left hemisphere NCM resulted in a complete block of the behavioral preference for passive playback of familiar songs within 30 min, whereas control aCSF dialysis had no effect on song preference prior to, or following the FAD treatment (81). Similarly, intracranial injection of the aromatase inhibitors FAD or ATD reduced song preferences within 30 min, whereas behavioral preferences for calls (simpler acoustic signals) were unaffected (82). Together, these convergent pieces of evidence show that acute and local estrogen signaling within the NCM improves auditory processing and can guide behavioral song preferences.

IV. Transynaptic modulation of sensorimotor representations by estrogens

The rapid actions of NCM estrogens on auditory preference behavior could depend entirely on local effects on NCM itself, or to rapid effects of estrogens that propagate from NCM to downstream targets (or some combination of these mechanisms). Since auditory processing is distributed among multiple sensory and sensorimotor circuits in the zebra finch brain (7, 9, 11, 77, 85-92), it is reasonable to expect that estrogen-dependent modulation of auditory processing in NCM is both influential and dependent upon the functional outputs of downstream targets.

One nucleus downstream from NCM is HVC (used as a proper name), which is essential for both song perception and song production (93-97). HVC is a sensorimotor nucleus at the juncture of the auditory pathway for song processing and the premotor pathway that directly governs song output. Individual HVC neurons are activated both when a male hears a rendition of his own song and when he is singing that same song (98), and HVC neurons have inherent ‘selectivity’ for the bird's own song relative to other stimuli (13, 85, 92, 99-106). This selective property of HVC neurons is considered essential for HVC's role in the feedback sensitivity and sensorimotor integration of singing behavior.

Using dual extracellular recordings coupled to retrodialysis in males, we recently reported that estrogens delivered to NCM can acutely enhance the responses of HVC neurons to the male's own song (107). This enhancement is stimulus-specific, since the responses of HVC neurons to conspecific songs are unaltered by estrogens acting in NCM. By contrast, as we had initially reported, the auditory-evoked activity of NCM neurons is enhanced for all song stimuli in response to estrogens acting in NCM. Therefore, estrogens in NCM influence the selectivity of HVC neurons for certain song features via an as yet unidentified, transsynaptic, modulatory signal. Similar experiments using reverse dialysis show that the aromatase inhibitor FAD into NCM causes a rapid suppression of the selectivity for the male's own song in HVC neurons (107). Therefore, rapid estrogen signaling can be transmitted and filtered as it propagates between two information processing nuclei, NCM and HVC. Our current hypothesis is that rapid estrogen signaling in NCM can enhance the production or perception (or both) of song via indirect modulation of HVC response properties. These recent findings are therefore consistent with the idea that acute estrogen production in the cortex is essential for ordinary cognitive function through actions on individual nodes within distributed networks.

V. Possible receptor mechanisms

The rapid actions of estrogens in the songbird auditory NCM suggest that they may be mediated by a non-classical receptor mechanism. One means to test membrane-specific effects of estrogens is to use conjugated molecules that prevent diffusion of steroids across the cellular membrane, such as biotinylated-estradiol (E6biotin). In other systems, E6biotin appears to restrict rapid estrogen signaling to membrane-specific events (108-110). In recent tests in the songbird auditory forebrain, E6biotin was found to be an effective mimic for the rapid actions of estrogens on NCM auditory processing (69, 107), indicating that these actions are likely mediated by a membrane-specific effect. The nature of the specific receptor mechanism for putative membrane-mediated rapid actions of estrogens in NCM is not well understood. We report below on preliminary experiments to explore this mechanism.

It is now clear that many rapid actions of estrogens can be mediated by the classical estrogen receptors (ERs) ERα and ERβ (e.g., 111, 112), possibly via nuclear receptors transiently docked in neuronal membranes (109, 113-117). Recent progress has been enabled by commercially-available drug ligands that are highly specific for ERα (propyl-pyrazole-triol; PPT) vs. ERβ (diarylpropionitrile; DPN), and that can have differential rapid actions in the brain (118-120). NCM neurons express ERα and ERβ (19, 23, 121), raising the possibility that the rapid actions of estrogens on NCM auditory processing are mediated by either of these nuclear receptor subtypes.

Rapid actions of estrogens can also be mediated by membrane receptors, including a formerly orphaned g-protein coupled receptor GPR30 (122) which has been renamed GPER1 (G-protein coupled estrogen receptor-1). Estrogen-dependent actions through the GPER1 receptor can be acute and specific in the brain (114, 123, 124). The GPER1 was recently characterized and protein expression was evaluated in juvenile and adult zebra finches (125). The expression levels of GPER1 are highest during the posthatching song learning period and are reduced in adulthood. Even still, GPER1 expression in adults is modestly elevated in the NCM region, raising the possibility that rapid estrogen signaling in the NCM occurs through GPER1 in neuronal membranes.

We have recently generated unpublished results from experiments testing the role of these candidate estrogen receptor subtypes in mediating the rapid actions of estrogens in NCM. Using the ER-selective agonists DPN or PPT with robust sample sizes (n = 7-9) and at comparable doses to estradiol itself (77 μM (PPT); 125 μM(DPN)), we have been unable to detect a significant recapitulation of the rapid actions of estradiol on the auditory-evoked activity in NCM in adult males (Fig. 1). In more limited experiments with the combination of DPN + PPT (n = 2; data not shown), we are also unable to detect a significant recapitulation of the rapid actions of estradiol in NCM. While the specificity of PPT and DPN for zebra finch ERα and ERβ, respectively, have not been characterized in brain tissue, it is important to note that these same agonists are effective at mimicking the actions of estradiol in another avian species (quail copulatory behaviors; 110). Based on these initial findings, we conclude that the rapid actions of estrogens on NCM auditory processing are mediated by a non-classical receptor. Moreover, in addition to the GPER1 mentioned above, two other candidate non-classical estrogen receptor mechanisms have been identified in mammalian systems that may be involved in the songbird NCM. First, a Gαq-coupled membrane receptor (Gq-mER) has been identified that is responsive to estrogens and a non-steroidal drug, STX, in several neurobiological preparations (114, 126-130). Second, a membrane associated estrogen receptor (ER-X) has been identified that has markedly different binding characteristics for many of the estrogenic agonists and antagonists (131). The involvement of GPER1, Gq-mER or ER-X in the songbird auditory forebrain has now become an active area of research interest.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The rapid actions of estradiol on NCM auditory processing are not mimicked by selective nuclear receptor agonists. In adult male zebra finches, acoustic playback of the bird's own song (BOS), conspecific song (CON), reverse BOS (REV), and to a lesser extent white noise (WN) each elicit an increase in the firing rate of NCM neurons relative to baseline conditions (i.e., responses are > 0 in the aCSF condition in panels A & B). Unlike responses to estradiol (as described in refs 69, 81, 107), the selective ERα agonist PPT (A; n = 9 birds) has no significant effect on NCM responses to playback stimuli (repeated measures ANOVA F = 0.57; p = 0.47). Similarly, the selective ERβ agonist DPN (N = 7 birds) has no significant effect on NCM responses to playback stimuli (repeated measures ANOVA F = 2.86; p = 0.17). The Z-score is Z-transformation of the evoked spiking activity in NCM that is used to standardize comparisons among playback stimuli. The Z-score is a numerical difference between the mean response during the playback stimulus minus the mean response during the baseline period, divided by the SD of the difference between the stimulus and baseline periods. S. Jeon, N. R. Joshi, and L. Remage-Healey, unpublished observations.

VI. Conclusions

This review summarizes recent work describing how estrogens are rapidly synthesized in the songbird brain in response to social and environmental cues, and how estrogens can have acute, modulatory actions on sensory encoding, sensorimotor integration and behavioral preferences. This perspective highlights the brain itself as a source and target for estrogens, and that this signaling mode can be on a timescale consistent with neuromodulation. With this perspective in mind it is important to consider the many ways that estrogens can influence brain function and behavior in parallel over much longer timescales, including seasonal and developmental events (22, 25, 29, 34, 64, 132-138). Because steroids are lipid-soluble and can readily cross the blood-brain-barrier, the steroid environments within the CNS vs. outside the CNS should not be considered independent (e.g., 139, 140). It is currently unclear to what extent the rapid, neuromodulatory actions of estrogens are dependent on more protracted changes in circulating steroids (141), although there is increasing evidence that the rapid actions of estradiol on behavior (142) and cell signaling pathways (143) are influenced by long-term seasonal events. Thus, this work has now set the stage for studies to explore the interactions between changes in circulating steroids (e.g., estrogens and androgen precursors) and the modulatory flucutations in estrogens within the brain.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by NIH R00NS066179, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, and the University of Massachusetts.

References

  • 1.Yoder KM, Vicario DS. To modulate and be modulated: estrogenic influences on auditory processing of communication signals within a socio-neuro-endocrine framework. Behav Neurosci. 2012;126(1):17–28. doi: 10.1037/a0026673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Saldanha CJ, Remage-Healey L, Schlinger BA. Synaptocrine Signaling: Steroid Synthesis and Action at the Synapse. Endocr Rev. 2011 doi: 10.1210/er.2011-0004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cornil CA, Ball GF, Balthazart J. Rapid control of male typical behaviors by brain-derived estrogens. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2012;33(4):425–46. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2012.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Remage-Healey L, Saldanha CJ, Schlinger BA. Estradiol synthesis and action at the synapse: Evidence for ‘synaptocrine’ signaling. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2011;2(28):1–13. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2011.00028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Remage-Healey L. Brain estrogen signaling effects acute modulation of acoustic communication behaviors: A working hypothesis. Bioessays. 2012;34(12):1009–16. doi: 10.1002/bies.201200081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Maney DL, Pinaud R. Estradiol-dependent modulation of auditory processing and selectivity in songbirds. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2011;32(3):287–302. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Doupe AJ, Solis MM, Kimpo R, Boettiger CA. Cellular, circuit, and synaptic mechanisms in song learning. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1016:495–523. doi: 10.1196/annals.1298.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brainard MS, Doupe AJ. Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2000;1(1):31–40. doi: 10.1038/35036205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lei H, Mooney R. Manipulation of a Central Auditory Representation Shapes Learned Vocal Output. Neuron. 2010;65(1):122–34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Roberts TF, Tschida KA, Klein ME, Mooney R. Rapid spine stabilization and synaptic enhancement at the onset of behavioural learning. Nature. 2010;463(7283):948–52. doi: 10.1038/nature08759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mooney R. Neural mechanisms for learned birdsong. Learning & Memory. 2009;16(11):655–69. doi: 10.1101/lm.1065209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prather JF, Nowicki S, Anderson RC, Peters S, Mooney R. Neural correlates of categorical perception in learned vocal communication. Nature Neuroscience. 2009;12(2):221–8. doi: 10.1038/nn.2246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bauer EE, Coleman MJ, Roberts TF, Roy A, Prather JF, Mooney R. A synaptic basis for auditory-vocal integration in the songbird. J Neurosci. 2008;28(6):1509–22. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3838-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Goldberg JH, Fee MS. A cortical motor nucleus drives the basal ganglia-recipient thalamus in singing birds. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15(4):620–7. doi: 10.1038/nn.3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hahnloser RH, Kotowicz A. Auditory representations and memory in birdsong learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010;20(3):332–9. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shaevitz SS, Theunissen FE. Functional connectivity between auditory areas field L and CLM and song system nucleus HVC in anesthetized zebra finches. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98(5):2747–64. doi: 10.1152/jn.00294.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Amin N, Grace JA, Theunissen FE. Neural response to bird?s own song and tutor song in the zebra finch field L and caudal mesopallium. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology. 2004;190(6):469–89. doi: 10.1007/s00359-004-0511-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gahr M, Metzdorf R. The sexually dimorphic expression of androgen receptors in the song nucleus hyperstriatalis ventrale pars caudale of the zebra finch develops independently of gonadal steroids. J Neurosci. 1999;19(7):2628–36. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02628.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Metzdorf R, Gahr M, Fusani L. Distribution of aromatase, estrogen receptor, and androgen receptor mRNA in the forebrain of songbirds and nonsongbirds. J Comp Neurol. 1999;407(1):115–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shen P, Schlinger BA, Campagnoni AT, Arnold AP. An Atlas of Aromatase Messenger-Rna Expression in the Zebra Finch Brain. J Comp Neurol. 1995;360(1):172–84. doi: 10.1002/cne.903600113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Matragrano LL, Sanford SE, Salvante KG, Beaulieu M, Sockman KW, Maney DL. Estradiol-dependent modulation of serotonergic markers in auditory areas of a seasonally breeding songbird. Behav Neurosci. 2012;126(1):110–22. doi: 10.1037/a0025586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Matragrano LL, Sanford SE, Salvante KG, Sockman KW, Maney DL. Estradiol-dependent catecholaminergic innervation of auditory areas in a seasonally breeding songbird. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;34(3):416–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07751.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saldanha CJ, Coomaralingam L. Overlap and co-expression of estrogen synthetic and responsive neurons in the songbird brain - a double-label immunocytochemical study. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2005;141(1):66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2004.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim YH, Perlman WR, Arnold AP. Expression of androgen receptor mRNA in zebra finch song system: Developmental regulation by estrogen. J Comp Neurol. 2004;469(4):535–47. doi: 10.1002/cne.11033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Soma KK, Schlinger BA, Wingfield JC, Saldanha CJ. Brain aromatase, 5 alpha-reductase, and 5 beta-reductase change seasonally in wild male song sparrows: Relationship to aggressive and sexual behavior. J Neurobiol. 2003;56(3):209–21. doi: 10.1002/neu.10225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ball GF, Castelino CB, Maney DL, Appeltants D, Balthazart J. The activation of birdsong by testosterone - Multiple sites of action and role of ascending catecholamine projections. Steroids and the Nervous System. 2003;1007:211–31. doi: 10.1196/annals.1286.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Meitzen J, Perkel DJ, Brenowitz EA. Seasonal changes in intrinsic electrophysiological activity of song control neurons in wild song sparrows. Journal of Comparative Physiology a-Neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology. 2007;193(6):677–83. doi: 10.1007/s00359-007-0222-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Park KHJ, Meitzen J, Moore IT, Brenowitz EA, Perkel DJ. Seasonal-like plasticity of spontaneous firing rate in a songbird pre-motor nucleus. J Neurobiol. 2005;64(2):181–91. doi: 10.1002/neu.20145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Maney DL, Goode CT, Lange HS, Sanford SE, Solomon BL. Estradiol Modulates Neural Responses to Song in a Seasonal Songbird. J Comp Neurol. 2008;511(2):173–86. doi: 10.1002/cne.21830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schlinger B, Brenowitz EA. Neural and Hormonal Control of Birdsong. In: Pfaff DW, editor. Hormones, Brain and Behavior. Elsevier; 2008. pp. 897–941. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thompson CK, Bentley GE, Brenowitz EA. Rapid seasonal-like regression of the adult avian song control system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(39):15520–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707239104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moore IT, Bentley GE, Wingfield JC, Brenowitz EA. Seasonal plasticity in the brain of a tropical bird. Integr Comp Biol. 2003;43(6):882. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tramontin AD, Wingfield JC, Brenowitz EA. Androgens and estrogens induce seasonal-like growth of song nuclei in the adult songbird brain. J Neurobiol. 2003;57(2):130–40. doi: 10.1002/neu.10263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Holloway CC, Clayton DE. Estrogen synthesis in the male brain triggers development of the avian song control pathway in vitro. Nature Neuroscience. 2001;4(2):170–5. doi: 10.1038/84001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.London SE, Clayton DF. Genomic and neural analysis of the estradiol-synthetic pathway in the zebra finch. BMC Neuroscience. 2010;11(1):46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.London SE, Remage-Healey L, Schlinger BA. Neurosteroid production in the songbird brain: A reevaluation of core principles. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.London SE, Schlinger BA. Steroidogenic enzymes along the ventricular proliferative zone in the developing songbird brain. J Comp Neurol. 2007;502(4):507–21. doi: 10.1002/cne.21335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.London SE, Monks DA, Wade J, Schlinger BA. Widespread capacity for steroid synthesis in the avian brain and song system. Endocrinology. 2006;147(12):5975–87. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shen P, Campagnoni CW, Kampf K, Schlinger BA, Arnold AP, Campagnoni AT. Isolation and Characterization of a Zebra Finch Aromatase Cdna - in-Situ Hybridization Reveals High Aromatase Expression in Brain. Mol Brain Res. 1994;24(1-4):227–37. doi: 10.1016/0169-328x(94)90136-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Saldanha CJ, Coomaralingam L. Overlap and co-expression of estrogen synthetic and responsive neurons in the songbird brain—a double-label immunocytochemical study. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2005;141(1):66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2004.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Saldanha CJ, Tuerk MJ, Kim YH, Fernandes AO, Arnold AP, Schlinger BA. Distribution and regulation of telencephalic aromatase expression in the zebra finch revealed with a specific antibody. J Comp Neurol. 2000;423(4):619–30. doi: 10.1002/1096-9861(20000807)423:4<619::aid-cne7>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schlinger BA. Sex steroids and their actions on the birdsong system. J Neurobiol. 1997;33(5):619–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schlinger BA, Arnold AP. Circulating Estrogens in a Male Songbird Originate in the Brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(16):7650–3. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Naftolin F, Horvath TL, Jakab RL, Leranth C, Harada N, Balthazart J. Aromatase immunoreactivity in axon terminals of the vertebrate brain. An immunocytochemical study on quail, rat, monkey and human tissues. Neuroendocrinology. 1996;63(2):149–55. doi: 10.1159/000126951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Peterson RS, Yarram L, Schlinger BA, Saldanha CJ. Aromatase is pre-synaptic and sexually dimorphic in the adult zebra finch brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences; 2005; pp. 2089–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Murakami G, Tanabe N, Ishii HT, Ogiue-Ikeda M, Tsurugizawa T, Mukai H, Hojo Y, Takata N, Furukawa A, Kimoto T, Kawato S. Role of cytochrome P450 in synaptocrinology: Endogenous estrogen synthesis in the brain hippocampus. Drug Metab Rev. 2006;38(3):353–69. doi: 10.1080/03602530600724068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rohmann KN, Schlinger BA, Saldanha CJ. Subcellular compartmentalization of aromatase is sexually dimorphic in the adult zebra finch brain. Dev Neurobiol. 2007;67(1):1–9. doi: 10.1002/dneu.20303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Remage-Healey L, Oyama RK, Schlinger BA. Elevated aromatase activity in forebrain synaptic terminals during song. J Neuroendocrinol. 2009;21(3):191–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2009.01820.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Balthazart J, Baillien M, Ball GF. Rapid control of brain aromatase activity by glutamatergic inputs. Endocrinology. 2006;147(1):359–66. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Balthazart J, Ball GF. Is brain estradiol a hormone or a neurotransmitter? Trends Neurosci. 2006;29(5):241–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2006.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Balthazart J, Baillien M, Charlier TD, Ball GF. Calcium-dependent phosphorylation processes control brain aromatase in quail. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17(8):1591–606. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02598.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Remage-Healey L, Maidment NT, Schlinger BA. Forebrain steroid levels fluctuate rapidly during social interactions. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11(11):1327–34. doi: 10.1038/nn.2200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Remage-Healey L, Dong S, Maidment NT, Schlinger BA. Presynaptic control of rapid estrogen fluctuations in the songbird auditory forebrain. J Neurosci. 2011;31(27):10034–8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0566-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cornil CA, Leung CH, Pletcher ER, Naranjo KC, Blauman SJ, Saldanha CJ. Acute and specific modulation of presynaptic aromatization in the vertebrate brain. Endocrinology. 2012;153(6):2562–7. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-2159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Srivastava DP, Waters EM, Mermelstein PG, Kramar EA, Shors TJ, Liu F. Rapid estrogen signaling in the brain: implications for the fine-tuning of neuronal circuitry. J Neurosci. 2011;31(45):16056–63. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4097-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Srivastava DP, Woolfrey KM, Jones KA, Shum CY, Lash LL, Swanson GT, Penzes P. Rapid enhancement of two-step wiring plasticity by estrogen and NMDA receptor activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(38):14650–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801581105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hart SA, Snyder MA, Smejkalova T, Woolley CS. Estrogen mobilizes a subset of estrogen receptor-alpha-immunoreactive vesicles in inhibitory presynaptic boutons in hippocampal CA1. J Neurosci. 2007;27(8):2102–11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5436-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Balthazart J, Baillien M, Ball GF. Phosphorylation processes mediate rapid changes of brain aromatase activity. J Steroid Biochem. 2001;79(1-5):261–77. doi: 10.1016/s0960-0760(01)00143-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cornil CA, Dalla C, Papadopoulou-Daifoti Z, Baillien M, Dejace C, Ball GF, Balthazart J. Rapid decreases in preoptic aromatase activity and brain monoamine concentrations after engaging in male sexual behavior. Endocrinology. 2005;146(9):3809–20. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.de Bournonville C, Dickens MJ, Ball GF, Balthazart J, Cornil CA. Dynamic changes in brain aromatase activity following sexual interactions in males: Where, when and why? Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Dickens MJ, Cornil CA, Balthazart J. Neurochemical control of rapid stress-induced changes in brain aromatase activity. J Neuroendocrinol. 2013;25(4):329–39. doi: 10.1111/jne.12012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Dickens MJ, Balthazart J, Cornil CA. Brain aromatase and circulating corticosterone are rapidly regulated by combined acute stress and sexual interaction in a sex-specific manner. J Neuroendocrinol. 2012;24(10):1322–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2012.02340.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dickens MJ, Cornil CA, Balthazart J. Acute stress differentially affects aromatase activity in specific brain nuclei of adult male and female quail. Endocrinology. 2011;152(11):4242–51. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Charlier TD, Newman AE, Heimovics SA, Po KW, Saldanha CJ, Soma KK. Rapid effects of aggressive interactions on aromatase activity and oestradiol in discrete brain regions of wild male white-crowned sparrows. J Neuroendocrinol. 2011;23(8):742–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02170.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Black MP, Balthazart J, Baillien M, Grober MS. Socially induced and rapid increases in aggression are inversely related to brain aromatase activity in a sex-changing fish, Lythrypnus dalli. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2005;272(1579):2337–44. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lord LD, Bond J, Thompson RR. Rapid steroid influences on visually guided sexual behavior in male goldfish. Horm Behav. 2009;56(5):519–26. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Taziaux M, Keller M, Bakker J, Balthazart J. Sexual Behavior activity tracks rapid changes in brain estrogen concentrations. J Neurosci. 2007;27(24):6563–72. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1797-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Soma KK, Tramontin AD, Wingfield JC. Oestrogen regulates male aggression in the non-breeding season. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio. 2000;267(1448):1089–96. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Remage-Healey L, Dong SM, Chao A, Schlinger BA. Sex-specific, rapid neuroestrogen fluctuations and neurophysiological actions in the songbird auditory forebrain. J Neurophysiol. 2012;107(6):1621–31. doi: 10.1152/jn.00749.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Goodson JL, Wang Y. Valence-sensitive neurons exhibit divergent functional profiles in gregarious and asocial species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences; 2006; pp. 17013–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Badrinarayan A, Wescott SA, Vander Weele CM, Saunders BT, Couturier BE, Maren S, Aragona BJ. Aversive stimuli differentially modulate real-time dopamine transmission dynamics within the nucleus accumbens core and shell. J Neurosci. 2012;32(45):15779–90. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3557-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick D, Katz LC, Lamantia AS, McNamara JO, Williams SM. Neuroscience. 2nd. Sunderland: Sinauer; 2001. Neurotransmitters. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Song WC, Melner MH. Editorial: Steroid transformation enzymes as critical regulators of steroid action in vivo. Endocrinology. 2000;141(5):1587–9. doi: 10.1210/endo.141.5.7526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mello CV, Vicario DS, Clayton DF. Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(15):6818–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.6818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Chew SJ, Vicario DS, Nottebohm F. A large-capacity memory system that recognizes the calls and songs of individual birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(5):1950–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.5.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Phan ML, Pytte CL, Vicario DS. Early auditory experience generates long-lasting memories that may subserve vocal learning in songbirds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(4):1088–93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510136103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bolhuis JJ, Gahr M. Neural mechanisms of birdsong memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2006;7(5):347–57. doi: 10.1038/nrn1904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Woolley SC, Doupe AJ. Social context-induced song variation affects female behavior and gene expression. PLoS Biol. 2008;6(3):e62. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.London SE, Clayton DF. Functional identification of sensory mechanisms required for developmental song learning. Nature Neuroscience. 2008;11(5):579–86. doi: 10.1038/nn.2103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tremere LA, Jeong JK, Pinaud R. Estradiol shapes auditory processing in the adult brain by regulating inhibitory transmission and plasticity-associated gene expression. J Neurosci. 2009;29(18):5949–63. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0774-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Remage-Healey L, Coleman MJ, Oyama RK, Schlinger BA. Brain estrogens rapidly strengthen auditory encoding and guide song preference in a songbird. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(8):3852–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906572107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tremere LA, Pinaud R. Brain-generated estradiol drives long-term optimization of auditory coding to enhance the discrimination of communication signals. J Neurosci. 2011;31(9):3271–89. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4355-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Holveck MJ, Riebel K. Preferred songs predict preferred males: consistency and repeatability of zebra finch females across three test contexts. Anim Behav. 2007;74:297–309. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Adret P. Operant-Conditioning, Song Learning and Imprinting to Taped Song in the Zebra Finch. Anim Behav. 1993;46(1):149–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Theunissen FE, Amin N, Shaevitz SS, Woolley SM, Fremouw T, Hauber ME. Song selectivity in the song system and in the auditory forebrain. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1016:222–45. doi: 10.1196/annals.1298.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Theunissen FE, Shaevitz SS. Auditory processing of vocal sounds in birds. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16(4):400–7. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Woolley CS. Estrogen-mediated structural and functional synaptic plasticity in the female rat hippocampus. Horm Behav. 1998;34(2):140–8. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1998.1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Woolley SM, Fremouw TE, Hsu A, Theunissen FE. Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(10):1371–9. doi: 10.1038/nn1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Woolley SM, Gill PR, Fremouw T, Theunissen FE. Functional groups in the avian auditory system. J Neurosci. 2009;29(9):2780–93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2042-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Brenowitz EA, Margoliash D, Nordeen KW. An introduction to birdsong and the avian song system. J Neurobiol. 1997;33(5):495–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Doupe AJ, Konishi M. Song-Selective Auditory Circuits in the Vocal Control-System of the Zebra Finch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(24):11339–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Doupe AJ, Solis MM. Song- and order-selective neurons develop in the songbird anterior forebrain during vocal learning. J Neurobiol. 1997;33(5):694–709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Brenowitz EA. Altered Perception of Species-Specific Song by Female Birds after Lesions of a Forebrain Nucleus. Science. 1991;251(4991):303–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1987645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Gentner TQ, Hulse SH, Bentley GE, Ball GF. Individual vocal recognition and the effect of partial lesions to HVc on discrimination, learning, and categorization of conspecific song in adult songbirds. J Neurobiol. 2000;42(1):117–33. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4695(200001)42:1<117::aid-neu11>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Long MA, Fee MS. Using temperature to analyse temporal dynamics in the songbird motor pathway. Nature. 2008;456(7219):189–94. doi: 10.1038/nature07448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Leonardo A, Fee MS. Ensemble coding of vocal control in birdsong. J Neurosci. 2005;25(3):652–61. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3036-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Roberts TF, Gobes SM, Murugan M, Olveczky BP, Mooney R. Motor circuits are required to encode a sensory model for imitative learning. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15(10):1454–9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Prather JF, Peters S, Nowicki S, Mooney R. Precise auditory–vocal mirroring in neurons for learned vocal communication. Nature. 2008;451(7176):305–10. doi: 10.1038/nature06492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Volman SF. Development of neural selectivity for birdsong during vocal learning. J Neurosci. 1993;13(11):4737–47. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-11-04737.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Coleman MJ, Mooney R. Synaptic transformations underlying highly selective auditory representations of learned birdsong. J Neurosci. 2004;24(33):7251–65. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0947-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Del Negro C, Lehongre K, Edeline JM. Selectivity of canary HVC neurons for the bird's own song: modulation by photoperiodic conditions. J Neurosci. 2005;25(20):4952–63. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4847-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Mooney R, Rosen MJ, Sturdy CB. A bird's eye view: top down intracellular analyses of auditory selectivity for learned vocalizations. Journal of Comparative Physiology a-Neuroethology Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology. 2002;188(11-2):879–95. doi: 10.1007/s00359-002-0353-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Nick TA, Konishi M. Neural auditory selectivity develops in parallel with song. J Neurobiol. 2005;62(4):469–81. doi: 10.1002/neu.20115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Solis MM, Brainard MS, Hessler NA, Doupe AJ. Song selectivity and sensorimotor signals in vocal learning and production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(22):11836–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.11836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Solis MM, Doupe AJ. Anterior forebrain neurons develop selectivity by an intermediate stage of birdsong learning. J Neurosci. 1997;17(16):6447–62. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-16-06447.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Solis MM, Doupe AJ. Contributions of tutor and bird's own song experience to neural selectivity in the songbird anterior forebrain. J Neurosci. 1999;19(11):4559–84. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-11-04559.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Remage-Healey L, Joshi NR. Changing Neuroestrogens Within the Auditory Forebrain Rapidly Transform Stimulus Selectivity in a Downstream Sensorimotor Nucleus. J Neurosci. 2012;32(24):8231–41. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1114-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Germain PS, Metezeau P, Tiefenauer LX, Kiefer H, Ratinaud MH, Habrioux G. Use of a Biotinyl-Estradiol Derivative to Demonstrate Estradiol-Membrane Binding-Sites on Adherent Human Breast-Cancer Mcf-7 Cells. Anticancer Res. 1993;13(6A):2347–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Dewing P, Boulware MI, Sinchak K, Christensen A, Mermelstein PG, Micevych P. Membrane estrogen receptor-alpha interactions with metabotropic glutamate receptor 1a modulate female sexual receptivity in rats. J Neurosci. 2007;27(35):9294–300. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0592-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Seredynski AL, Balthazart J, Christophe VJ, Ball GF, Cornil CA. Neuroestrogens rapidly regulate sexual motivation but not performance. J Neurosci. 2013;33(1):164–74. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2557-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Bryant DN, Sheldahl LC, Marriott LK, Shapiro RA, Dorsa DM. Multiple pathways transmit neuroprotective effects of gonadal steroids. Endocrine. 2006;29(2):199–207. doi: 10.1385/ENDO:29:2:199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Abraham IM, Todman MG, Korach KS, Herbison AE. Critical in vivo roles for classical estrogen receptors in rapid estrogen actions on intracellular signaling in mouse brain. Endocrinology. 2004;145(7):3055–61. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Sheldahl LC, Shapiro RA, Bryant DN, Koerner IP, Dorsa DM. Estrogen induces rapid translocation of estrogen receptor beta, but not estrogen receptor alpha, to the neuronal plasma membrane. Neuroscience. 2008;153(3):751–61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.02.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Kuo J, Hamid N, Bondar G, Prossnitz ER, Micevych P. Membrane Estrogen Receptors Stimulate Intracellular Calcium Release and Progesterone Synthesis in Hypothalamic Astrocytes. J Neurosci. 2010;30(39):12950–7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1158-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Boulware MI, Mermelstein PG. Membrane estrogen receptors activate metabotropic glutamate receptors to influence nervous system physiology. Steroids. 2009;74(7):608–13. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2008.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Mermelstein PG. Membrane-localised oestrogen receptor alpha and beta influence neuronal activity through activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors. J Neuroendocrinol. 2009;21(4):257–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2009.01838.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Micevych PE, Mermelstein PG. Membrane estrogen receptors acting through metabotropic glutamate receptors: an emerging mechanism of estrogen action in brain. Mol Neurobiol. 2008;38(1):66–77. doi: 10.1007/s12035-008-8034-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Phan A, Lancaster KE, Armstrong JN, MacLusky NJ, Choleris E. Rapid effects of estrogen receptor alpha and beta selective agonists on learning and dendritic spines in female mice. Endocrinology. 2011;152(4):1492–502. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Frick KM. Building a better hormone therapy? How understanding the rapid effects of sex steroid hormones could lead to new therapeutics for age-related memory decline. Behav Neurosci. 2012;126(1):29–53. doi: 10.1037/a0026660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Seredynski AL, Ball GF, Balthazart J, Charlier TD. Specific activation of estrogen receptor alpha and beta enhances male sexual behavior and neuroplasticity in male Japanese quail. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Jeong JK, Burrows K, Tremere LA, Pinaud R. Neurochemical organization and experience-dependent activation of estrogen-associated circuits in the songbird auditory forebrain. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;34(2):283–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07743.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Brailoiu E, Dun SL, Brailoiu GC, Mizuo K, Sklar LA, Oprea TI, Prossnitz ER, Dun NJ. Distribution and characterization of estrogen receptor G protein-coupled receptor 30 in the rat central nervous system. J Endocrinol. 2007;193(2):311–21. doi: 10.1677/JOE-07-0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Noel SD, Keen KL, Baumann DI, Filardo EJ, Terasawa E. Involvement of G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) in rapid action of estrogen in primate LHRH neurons. Mol Endocrinol. 2009;23(3):349–59. doi: 10.1210/me.2008-0299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Liu SB, Zhang N, Guo YY, Zhao R, Shi TY, Feng SF, Wang SQ, Yang Q, Li XQ, Wu YM, Ma L, Hou Y, Xiong LZ, Zhang W, Zhao MG. G-Protein-Coupled Receptor 30 Mediates Rapid Neuroprotective Effects of Estrogen via Depression of NR2B-Containing NMDA Receptors. J Neurosci. 2012;32(14):4887–900. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5828-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Acharya KD, Veney SL. Characterization of the G-protein-coupled membrane-bound estrogen receptor GPR30 in the zebra finch brain reveals a sex difference in gene and protein expression. Dev Neurobiol. 2012;72(11):1433–46. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kenealy BP, Keen KL, Terasawa E. Rapid action of estradiol in primate GnRH neurons: the role of estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta. Steroids. 2011;76(9):861–6. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2011.02.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Micevych PE, Dewing P. Membrane-initiated estradiol signaling regulating sexual receptivity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2011;2:26. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2011.00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Qiu J, Bosch MA, Tobias SC, Grandy DK, Scanlan TS, Ronnekleiv OK, Kelly MJ. Rapid signaling of estrogen in hypothalamic neurons involves a novel G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor that activates protein kinase C. J Neurosci. 2003;23(29):9529–40. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-29-09529.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Qiu J, Ronnekleiv O, Kelly M. Modulation of hypothalamic neuronal activity through a novel G-protein-coupled estrogen membrane receptor. Steroids. 2008;73(9-10):985–91. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Micevych PE, Kelly MJ. Membrane estrogen receptor regulation of hypothalamic function. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;96(2):103–10. doi: 10.1159/000338400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Toran-Allerand CD, Guan X, MacLusky NJ, Horvath TL, Diano S, Singh M, Connolly ES, Jr, Nethrapalli IS, Tinnikov AA. ER-X: a novel, plasma membrane-associated, putative estrogen receptor that is regulated during development and after ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci. 2002;22(19):8391–401. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-19-08391.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Ball GF, Auger CJ, Bernard DJ, Charlier TD, Sartor JJ, Riters LV, Balthazart J. Seasonal plasticity in the song control system - Multiple brain sites of steroid hormone action and the importance of variation in song behavior. Ann Ny Acad Sci. 2004;1016:586–610. doi: 10.1196/annals.1298.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Caras ML, Brenowitz E, Rubel EW. Peripheral auditory processing changes seasonally in Gambel's white-crowned sparrow. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2010;196(8):581–99. doi: 10.1007/s00359-010-0545-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Maney DL, Cho E, Goode CT. Estrogen-dependent selectivity of genomic responses to birdsong. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23(6):1523–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04673.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Meitzen J, Moore IT, Lent K, Brenowitz EA, Perkel DJ. Steroid hormones act transsynaptically within the forebrain to regulate neuronal phenotype and song stereotypy. J Neurosci. 2007;27(44):12045–57. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3289-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Sisneros JA, Bass AH. Seasonal plasticity of peripheral auditory frequency sensitivity. J Neurosci. 2003;23(3):1049–58. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-03-01049.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.AdkinsRegan E, Mansukhani V, Thompson R, Yang S. Organizational actions of sex hormones on sexual partner preference. Brain Res Bull. 1997;44(4):497–502. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(97)00231-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Fargo KN, Foster AM, Harty MW, Sengelaub DR. Estrogen alters excitability but not morphology of a sexually dimorphic neuromuscular system in adult rats. J Neurobiol. 2003;56(1):66–77. doi: 10.1002/neu.10224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Saleh TM, Connell BJ, McQuaid T, Cribb AE. Estrogen-induced neurochemical and electrophysiological changes in the parabrachial nucleus of the male rat. Brain Res. 2003;990(1-2):58–65. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)03387-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Thoeringer C, Sillaber I, Roedel A, Erhardt A, Mueller M, Ohl F, Holsboer F, Keck M. The temporal dynamics of intrahippocampal corticosterone in response to stress-related stimuli with different emotional and physical load: An in vivo microdialysis study in C57BL/6 and DBA/2 inbred mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007;32(6):746–57. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Maney DL. Whither the gonads? (Comment on DOI 10.1002/bies.201200081) Bioessays. 2012;34(12):1008. doi: 10.1002/bies.201200142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Trainor BC, Finy MS, Nelson RJ. Rapid effects of estradiol on male aggression depend on photoperiod in reproductively non-responsive mice. Horm Behav. 2008;53(1):192–9. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Heimovics SA, Prior NH, Maddison CJ, Soma KK. Rapid and widespread effects of 17beta-estradiol on intracellular signaling in the male songbird brain: a seasonal comparison. Endocrinology. 2012;153(3):1364–76. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES