Abstract
Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) have the ability to spontaneously generate structured tissues in vitro reminiscent of embryonic tissue development. Recently, complex organoids such as cortical tissues, cerebral brain organoids, optical cups, intestinal tissues, and liver buds have been generated from PSCs derived from healthy individuals and patients with genetic diseases, providing powerful tools to understand morphogenesis and disease pathology. This article highlights recent advances in the state-of-art generation of organoids from PSCs, possible signaling pathways and mechanisms involved in organogenesis, and the understanding of extracellular microenvironment. Challenges involved in the organoid generation such as increasing organoid size, enhancing the tissue complexity, and improving functional maturation are also discussed.
Keywords: pluripotent stem cell, organoid, extracellular matrix, tissue development, 3-D
Introduction
Organogenesis from pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) has been chosen by Science's editors as a runner-up for 2013 Breakthrough of the Year.1 This highlights remarkable progress achieved from extensive studies on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), first reported in 1998 and 2007, respectively.2,3 In theory, PSCs have unlimited proliferation capability and the ability to differentiate into nearly all types of human cells. Thus most studies have been focusing on the development and improvement of culturing of undifferentiated PSCs and directed differentiation of PSCs into specific lineages, often on adherent cultures. In recent years, the investigation on self-organization of PSC derivatives into three-dimensional (3-D) organ-like structures has also emerged.4-6 By their unique ability to coordinate the dictatorial signals and to form tissue- and mini-organ- like structures reminiscent of cell organization in vivo, PSCs provide a powerful tool to understand the development and morphogenesis in health and disease.7 These organ-like structures not only have the potential in regenerative medicine but can also serve as novel platforms in drug discovery to identify emerging therapeutic targets.
Three-Dimensional Aggregates of PSCs
Enhanced properties in biomedical applications
Human PSCs (hPSCs) can provide a spectrum of human cells in large quantities, which has motivated the exploration of hPSCs in drug screening and disease modeling for immediate applications. Furthermore, hiPSCs derived from patients with genetic disorders in neurological (e.g., Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s), cardiovascular (e.g., long QT syndrome), and other systems can recapitulate disease-relevant phenotypes when differentiated into disease-specific cell types.8,9 Comparative molecular and cellular studies on hiPSC-derivatives from patients and unaffected controls could lead to novel mechanistic insights into disease pathobiology.4 Additionally, toxicity screening with hiPSC-derivatives shows that patient-specific cells (e.g., patients with long QT syndrome, familial hypotrophic cardiomyopathy, and familial dilated cardiomyopathy) can have distinct susceptibility to cardiotoxic drugs (e.g., Verapamil, Alfuzosin) that cannot be captured when tested in animal cell line models.9 Interestingly, 3-D organoids such as hepatocyte spheroids have shown the increased sensitivity to pharmacotoxic compounds compared with 2-D monolayer cultures.10
Undifferentiated PSC aggregates and embryoid bodies
Undifferentiated PSCs can self-assemble into 3-D aggregates for expansion as reported recently.11 Histological examination of PSC aggregates revealed homogenous cell population throughout the structure, suggesting that medium composition can influence the cells in the aggregates to maintain their self-renewal and restrict the cells from the developmental path. Differentiation from PSCs can however be induced by the formation of embryoid bodies (EBs), an aggregate-like structure that contains three-germ layers.12 Development of EBs starts with the specification of the exterior cells toward primitive endoderm, the lining of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins collagen IV and laminin, and the interior cells surrounding a fluid-filled cavity.13 Further differentiation from EBs leads to the formation of derivatives of the three-germ lineages. With specific inducing medium and growth factors, the EB composition can be modulated toward a particular lineage such as cardiomyocytes.14
Extracellular matrix
Cells in the 3-D aggregates of PSCs produce large amounts of extracellular matrices which may carry the signaling molecules and autocrine/paracrine factors (e.g., Lefty and Activin A) to modulate lineage commitment by the cells.15,16 We and others have derived ECMs from various types of PSC aggregates at different developmental stages and demonstrated that the ECMs contain structures and signaling that can bias cell fate decisions.17,18 The impact of PSC-derived ECMs on cellular differentiation may rely on ECM-bound growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2, the biochemical composition of ECMs, and the biomechanical properties of ECMs.19 Endogenous ECMs deposited on Matrigel have been found to support the propagation of hPSCs due to the retention of the paracrine and autocrine factors such as Gremlin and Cerberus, the antagonists of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling.20 However, the complex ECM microenvironment that can coax the tissue development from PSCs remains to be further elucidated.
Organoids Derived from PSCs
More complex structures other than undifferentiated PSC aggregates and the EBs with three-germ layers have been created recently to model the development of various tissue types such as cortical tissues, cerebral region of the brain, optical cups, and liver buds.4,21,22 These complex organs contain cells that are integrated in a spatially restricted manner and provide dictatorial signals that organize the sequential developmental events.7
Cerebral brain organoids and optical cups (ectoderm)
Modeling brain tissues was initially done for cortical layers following formation of serum-free, floating EB-like quick aggregates (SFEBq) from hPSCs.23,24 In the presence of FGF-2 and inhibitors of BMP, Wnt/β-catenin, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β/activin/nodal pathways, hiPSCs can generate 3-D structures that contain polarized glia intermediate progenitors and layer-specific cortical neurons.23 More recently, cerebral brain organoids have been formed using hiPSC-derived neural progenitors within droplets of Matrigel cultured in a bioreactor.4 These cerebral brain organoids show regional specification of forebrain, midbrain, and hindbrain structures and the developmental changes of different regions. Furthermore, the cerebral organoids derived from a patient with microcephaly display smaller neural tissues, resembling reduced brain size in the patient.4
In the presence of the Wnt inhibitor and Matrigel, self-organization of hESCs using a modified SFEBq culture can lead to the formation of optical cups.21,24,25 These optical cups contain an outer layer which develops into retinal pigment epithelium and inner neurosensory layers.21,25 The formed neural retina spontaneously curves in an apically convex manner and forms multilayer tissues that contain rods and cones.21 Using mouse ESCs, functional adenohypophysis can be formed through large cell-aggregation and BMP-4 treatment.26 These adenohypophysis tissues are able to secret adrenocorticotropic hormone and rescue systemic glucocorticoid level in a hypopituitary mouse model.
Cardiac microtissues (mesoderm)
Cardiac cells derived from hPSCs can form spheres called cardiac bodies27 or self-assemble into scaffold-free cardiac tissues.28 These 3-D structures however lack the complex organoid structure and require further maturation. Cardiac tissue maturation may be improved by several approaches such as using 3-D scaffolds to create biomimetic cardiac wires or stimulating adult cell energy metabolism through medium formulation.29-32 While the aggregates derived from somatic and hPSC-derived mesoderm progenitor cells have been formed,33,34 the complex organoid structure containing multiple tissue specifications is yet to be demonstrated.
Intestine, liver, and islet organoids (endoderm)
Intestinal organoids have been derived through endoderm induction and specification of hindgut spheroids by WNT3A and FGF-4 treatment.35 Embedding the spheroids in Matrigel allows cell maturation into intestinal organoids in a stage-specific manner similar to fetal gut development. These 3-D intestinal organoids contain all differentiated cell types of intestinal epithelium as well as villus-like domains and crypt-like progenitor niches.35 By transient overexpression of two transcription factors, NKX2.1 and PAX8, followed by the treatment of thyroid-stimulating hormone, mouse ESCs can be induced to differentiate into thyroid follicular cells in vitro and organize into 3-D follicular structures with iodide organification activity.36 These tissues can rescue plasma levels of thyroid hormone and promote symptomatic recovery in athyroid mice post-implantation.
The vascularized liver organoids (or liver buds: LB) can be generated by co-culturing of hiPSC-derived hepatocyte progenitors with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVACs) and human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs).22 Transplantation of hiPSC-LBs in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice leads to the generation of vascularized and functional liver that is capable of producing high levels of albumin and has the drug metabolism activity to form human-specific metabolites. Co-culture of PSC-derived progenitors with organ-matched mesenchyme has been shown to permit expansion of stage-specific progenitors along pancreatic lineages, demonstrating the context-specific coaxing of hPSC development.37 The 3-D islet structures with β cells surrounded by glucagon-producing α cells have been generated from iPSCs, which were able to secrete insulin in response to glucose and improve blood glucose levels in hyperglycemic mice.38 To provide 3-D microenvironment, collagen gels were also used to promote islet-like structures derived from ESCs which improved the maturation of insulin-producing cells.39 These studies indicate that the ability of in vitro self-organization of PSC-derived pancreatic cells provides a novel approach to create functional mature tissues.40
Mechanisms and Methods to Form Organoids by Self-Organization
Mechanisms for organoid formation
Most organoids are formed through the process involving intrinsic tissue mechanics and the programmed internal interactions, known as self-organization. Self-organization can be classified into three categories as self-assembly (time-evolving control of relative cell positions), self-patterning (spatiotemporal control of cell status) and self-morphogenesis (deformation, local growth, and remodeling).5,7 A “reaction-diffusion” mechanism is described as the driving force for self-patterning which involves the activation and inhibition of intrinsic signaling such as Wnt to provide spatiotemporal cues.41 A “relaxation-expansion” model is proposed to interpret the self-morphogenesis and tissue dynamics during optic cup formation from PSCs, which involves three local rules-relaxation, apical constriction, and expansion.42 While better understanding of self-organization needs powerful imaging tools and the knowledge in cellular mechanical properties, understanding the culture systems of the organoids formation is the pre-requisite for the mechanism study.
Appropriate starting cell population(s)
hPSC-derived progenitors are promising cell sources for organoid formation due to their ability of self-morphogenesis along a variety of developmental paths, the unlimited cell supply, and the potential for large scale or high-throughput generation.5 Modified EB-based methods are commonly used for the formation of ectoderm organoids while the endoderm organoids usually start from monolayers of definitive endoderm progenitors. Characterization of progenitors at the intermediate stage (e.g., neuroectodermal spheres, forgut endoderm) is required and should enhance the reproducibility of organoid structure. The storage of intermediate stratified neural retina has been demonstrated to control the quality of optic cups, indicating the importance of appropriate starting cell population to form the organoids.21
Medium composition and different growth factors
While PSCs can spontaneously self-organize into aggregate/organoid structures, medium compositions including growth factors affect the lineage commitment and regional specification inside the organoids. For examples, the Wnt inhibitors such as IWR1-endo and DKK-1 have been applied to generate retinal progenitors or cortical tissues in the EB culture,21,24 and epidermal growth factor, noggin, and R-spondin-1 can augment the formation of lingual organoids.43 Cerebral organoids are simply formed in neural inductive medium containing heparin with stage-wise modification of the differentiation medium.4 For intestinal tissues, FGF-4 and Wnt3A are used to promote the formation of hindgut spheroids.35 These studies indicate the importance of medium composition during organoid self-organization.
3-D extracellular matrix
To form the functional organoids, 3-D matrices are usually used in the culture system. The commonly used 3-D matrices include Matrigel, collagen gel and fibrin gel probably due to their ability to actively interact with cells and to modulate cell growth and differentiation.5,44 Progenitor cells can be embedded, encapsulated or resuspended in Matrigel to promote organoid formation.4,35 Matrigel has also been added in the medium as the supplement to promote the neural retina formation and cardiomyocyte differentiation.21,34 While Matrigel has been traditionally used in organotypic culture, the exact role of Matrigel and inductive factors that promote organoid formation remain to be defined. To this end, synthetic hydrogels that have defined biochemical and structural features provide an alternative matrix to Matrigel.
A system to overcome transport limitation
The size of organoids has been reported to range from 200 μm to 4 mm. With the increase in aggregate size, diffusion limitations become the limiting factor for the organoid development as seen in EBs.45 Aggregate-size dependent diffusion limitations have been observed and modeled for EBs, which suggests that the diffusion length is about 200 μm.45 Bioreactors (such as suspension and perfusion bioreactors) have the ability to grow large-sized organoids due to the enhanced nutrient transport, which has been demonstrated for cerebral organoids with the size about 4 mm.4 While the bioreactors have been studied to expand and differentiate the stem cell aggregates,46,47 how the reactor design and operation affect the organoid structure is not well understood. The vascularized structure of liver buds has also been generated in vivo through co-culture of hPSC-derived hepatic progenitors with hMSC and HUVEC cells,22 although the potential of co-culture system to generate large-sized organoids in vitro still needs further investigation.
Perspectives and Challenges
The unique properties of PSCs to generate structured organoids provide powerful tools to study organogenesis reminiscent of in vivo tissue development, to establish high-throughput organoid assays for drug screening, and to recapitulate genetic diseases for pathobiological study.48 Recent advances show that a variety of mini-organoids can be formed from hPSCs including those derived from patients with genetic diseases. However, mechanisms of organogenesis are yet to be fully understood and further investigation is needed in areas including developmental signaling networks, tissue mechanics, and dynamic local interactions. It is still challenging to generate large-sized organoids with functional maturation. The regional specification of organoids has only been achieved for specific types of tissues in neuroectoderm and endoderm. To address these challenges, understanding the local extracellular matrix environment and the bioreactor systems could help accelerate the progress of hPSC-derived organoids toward clinical applications.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge grant support from the National Science Foundation (grant No.1342192 to Y.L.), the National Institutes of Health (R21HL118454 to C.X.), the Center for the Advancement of Science in Space (GA-2014-126 to C.X.), and the James King Biomedical Research Program (4KB09 to T.M.).
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- 3-D
three-dimensional
- BMP
bone morphogenetic protein
- EBs
embryoid bodies
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- ESCs
embryonic stem cells
- FGF
fibroblast growth factor
- hESCs
human embryonic stem cells
- hiPSCs
human induced pluripotent stem cells
- hMSCs
human mesenchymal stem cells
- hPSCs
human pluripotent stem cells
- HUVACs
human umbilical vein endothelial cells
- LB
liver bud
- NOD/SCID
nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency
- PSCs
pluripotent stem cells
- SFEBq
serum-free, floating EB-like quick aggregates
- TGF
transforming growth factor
References
- 1.2013 Runners-Up. Dishing up mini-organs. Science. 2013;342:1436–7. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6165.1436-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282:1145–7. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131:861–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lancaster MA, Renner M, Martin CA, Wenzel D, Bicknell LS, Hurles ME, Homfray T, Penninger JM, Jackson AP, Knoblich JA. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature. 2013;501:373–9. doi: 10.1038/nature12517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sasai Y. Next-generation regenerative medicine: organogenesis from stem cells in 3D culture. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:520–30. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kinney MA, Hookway TA, Wang Y, McDevitt TC. Engineering three-dimensional stem cell morphogenesis for the development of tissue models and scalable regenerative therapeutics. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014;42:352–67. doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0953-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sasai Y. Cytosystems dynamics in self-organization of tissue architecture. Nature. 2013;493:318–26. doi: 10.1038/nature11859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Engle SJ, Puppala D. Integrating human pluripotent stem cells into drug development. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:669–77. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liang P, Lan F, Lee AS, Gong T, Sanchez-Freire V, Wang Y, Diecke S, Sallam K, Knowles JW, Wang PJ, et al. Drug screening using a library of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes reveals disease-specific patterns of cardiotoxicity. Circulation. 2013;127:1677–91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hynds RE, Giangreco A. Concise review: the relevance of human stem cell-derived organoid models for epithelial translational medicine. Stem Cells. 2013;31:417–22. doi: 10.1002/stem.1290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zweigerdt R, Olmer R, Singh H, Haverich A, Martin U. Scalable expansion of human pluripotent stem cells in suspension culture. Nat Protoc. 2011;6:689–700. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bratt-Leal AM, Carpenedo RL, McDevitt TC. Engineering the embryoid body microenvironment to direct embryonic stem cell differentiation. Biotechnol Prog. 2009;25:43–51. doi: 10.1002/btpr.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ungrin MD, Joshi C, Nica A, Bauwens C, Zandstra PW. Reproducible, ultra high-throughput formation of multicellular organization from single cell suspension-derived human embryonic stem cell aggregates. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang L, Soonpaa MH, Adler ED, Roepke TK, Kattman SJ, Kennedy M, Henckaerts E, Bonham K, Abbott GW, Linden RM, et al. Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population. Nature. 2008;453:524–8. doi: 10.1038/nature06894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nair R, Ngangan AV, Kemp ML, McDevitt TC. Gene expression signatures of extracellular matrix and growth factors during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Postovit LM, Margaryan NV, Seftor EA, Kirschmann DA, Lipavsky A, Wheaton WW, Abbott DE, Seftor RE, Hendrix MJ. Human embryonic stem cell microenvironment suppresses the tumorigenic phenotype of aggressive cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:4329–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800467105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sart S, Ma T, Li Y. Extracellular matrices decellularized from embryonic stem cells maintained their structure and signaling specificity. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20:54–66. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goh SK, Olsen P, Banerjee I. Extracellular matrix aggregates from differentiating embryoid bodies as a scaffold to support ESC proliferation and differentiation. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sart S, Agathos SN, Li Y. Engineering stem cell fate with biochemical and biomechanical properties of microcarriers. Biotechnol Prog. 2013;29:1354–66. doi: 10.1002/btpr.1825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hughes C, Radan L, Chang WY, Stanford WL, Betts DH, Postovit LM, Lajoie GA. Mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of the matrix microenvironment in pluripotent stem cell culture. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:1924–36. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M112.020057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nakano T, Ando S, Takata N, Kawada M, Muguruma K, Sekiguchi K, Saito K, Yonemura S, Eiraku M, Sasai Y. Self-formation of optic cups and storable stratified neural retina from human ESCs. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10:771–85. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Takebe T, Sekine K, Enomura M, Koike H, Kimura M, Ogaeri T, Zhang RR, Ueno Y, Zheng YW, Koike N, et al. Vascularized and functional human liver from an iPSC-derived organ bud transplant. Nature. 2013;499:481–4. doi: 10.1038/nature12271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mariani J, Simonini MV, Palejev D, Tomasini L, Coppola G, Szekely AM, Horvath TL, Vaccarino FM. Modeling human cortical development in vitro using induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:12770–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202944109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eiraku M, Watanabe K, Matsuo-Takasaki M, Kawada M, Yonemura S, Matsumura M, Wataya T, Nishiyama A, Muguruma K, Sasai Y. Self-organized formation of polarized cortical tissues from ESCs and its active manipulation by extrinsic signals. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3:519–32. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Eiraku M, Takata N, Ishibashi H, Kawada M, Sakakura E, Okuda S, Sekiguchi K, Adachi T, Sasai Y. Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature. 2011;472:51–6. doi: 10.1038/nature09941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Suga H, Kadoshima T, Minaguchi M, Ohgushi M, Soen M, Nakano T, Takata N, Wataya T, Muguruma K, Miyoshi H, et al. Self-formation of functional adenohypophysis in three-dimensional culture. Nature. 2011;480:57–62. doi: 10.1038/nature10637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xu C, Police S, Hassanipour M, Gold JD. Cardiac bodies: a novel culture method for enrichment of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2006;15:631–9. doi: 10.1089/scd.2006.15.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stevens KR, Pabon L, Muskheli V, Murry CE. Scaffold-free human cardiac tissue patch created from embryonic stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:1211–22. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nunes SS, Miklas JW, Liu J, Aschar-Sobbi R, Xiao Y, Zhang B, Jiang J, Massé S, Gagliardi M, Hsieh A, et al. Biowire: a platform for maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat Methods. 2013;10:781–7. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim C, Wong J, Wen J, Wang S, Wang C, Spiering S, Kan NG, Forcales S, Puri PL, Leone TC, et al. Studying arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia with patient-specific iPSCs. Nature. 2013;494:105–10. doi: 10.1038/nature11799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thavandiran N, Dubois N, Mikryukov A, Massé S, Beca B, Simmons CA, Deshpande VS, McGarry JP, Chen CS, Nanthakumar K, et al. Design and formulation of functional pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac microtissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E4698–707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311120110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang D, Shadrin IY, Lam J, Xian HQ, Snodgrass HR, Bursac N. Tissue-engineered cardiac patch for advanced functional maturation of human ESC-derived cardiomyocytes. Biomaterials. 2013;34:5813–20. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sart S, Tsai A-C, Li Y, Ma T. Three-dimensional aggregates of mesenchymal stem cells: cellular mechanisms, biological properties, and applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2013 doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2013.0537. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mummery CL, Zhang J, Ng ES, Elliott DA, Elefanty AG, Kamp TJ. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells to cardiomyocytes: a methods overview. Circ Res. 2012;111:344–58. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.227512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Spence JR, Mayhew CN, Rankin SA, Kuhar MF, Vallance JE, Tolle K, Hoskins EE, Kalinichenko VV, Wells SI, Zorn AM, et al. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into intestinal tissue in vitro. Nature. 2011;470:105–9. doi: 10.1038/nature09691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Antonica F, Kasprzyk DF, Opitz R, Iacovino M, Liao XH, Dumitrescu AM, Refetoff S, Peremans K, Manto M, Kyba M, et al. Generation of functional thyroid from embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2012;491:66–71. doi: 10.1038/nature11525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sneddon JB, Borowiak M, Melton DA. Self-renewal of embryonic-stem-cell-derived progenitors by organ-matched mesenchyme. Nature. 2012;491:765–8. doi: 10.1038/nature11463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Saito H, Takeuchi M, Chida K, Miyajima A. Generation of glucose-responsive functional islets with a three-dimensional structure from mouse fetal pancreatic cells and iPS cells in vitro. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang X, Ye K. Three-dimensional differentiation of embryonic stem cells into islet-like insulin-producing clusters. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:1941–52. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Woodford C, Zandstra PW. Tissue engineering 2.0: guiding self-organization during pluripotent stem cell differentiation. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012;23:810–9. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kondo S, Miura T. Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for understanding biological pattern formation. Science. 2010;329:1616–20. doi: 10.1126/science.1179047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Eiraku M, Adachi T, Sasai Y. Relaxation-expansion model for self-driven retinal morphogenesis: a hypothesis from the perspective of biosystems dynamics at the multi-cellular level. Bioessays. 2012;34:17–25. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hisha H, Tanaka T, Kanno S, Tokuyama Y, Komai Y, Ohe S, Yanai H, Omachi T, Ueno H. Establishment of a novel lingual organoid culture system: generation of organoids having mature keratinized epithelium from adult epithelial stem cells. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3224. doi: 10.1038/srep03224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sato T, Stange DE, Ferrante M, Vries RG, Van Es JH, Van den Brink S, Van Houdt WJ, Pronk A, Van Gorp J, Siersema PD, et al. Long-term expansion of epithelial organoids from human colon, adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and Barrett’s epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1762–72. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Van Winkle AP, Gates ID, Kallos MS. Mass transfer limitations in embryoid bodies during human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Cells Tissues Organs. 2012;196:34–47. doi: 10.1159/000330691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sart S, Agathos SN, Li Y. Process engineering of stem cell metabolism for large scale expansion and differentiation in bioreactors. Biochem Eng J. 2014;84:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2014.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kinney MA, Sargent CY, McDevitt TC. The multiparametric effects of hydrodynamic environments on stem cell culture. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2011;17:249–62. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Luni C, Serena E, Elvassore N. Human-on-chip for therapy development and fundamental science. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;25:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]