Skip to main content
Pharmacy Practice logoLink to Pharmacy Practice
. 2007 Apr 2;5(1):36–41. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552007000100006

Consumption of antibiotics in a small Pacific island nation: Samoa

Pauline Norris 1, Hong Anh Nguyen 2
PMCID: PMC4155148  PMID: 25214916

Abstract

High levels of antibiotic use contribute to development of antibiotic resistance. There is little known about levels of antibiotic use in Samoa, although anecdotally, there are high levels of use, and a strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus may have developed there. The study aimed to gather basic data on levels of antibiotic use in Samoa.

All those who import medicines into Samoa were interviewed; invoices, prescription records in hospitals, pharmacies and health centres were reviewed; and prospective observation was carried out in private pharmacies.

Analysis of orders made in one year provided an estimate of overall antibiotic consumption of 37.3 Defined Daily Doses (DDDs) per 1000 inhabitant days. Penicillins comprised 63% of DDDs used. Antibiotics were around a third of all prescribed drugs in hospitals and pharmacies, and 44% of those dispensed in health centres. Approximately two-thirds of prescriptions dispensed included an antibiotic. A quarter of antibiotic sales in pharmacies were without a prescription.

Samoa has high rates of use of antibiotics and very high reliance on penicillins, compared to other developing countries. Levels of prescribing are high compared with other developing nations. It is feasible to calculate total consumption of medicines in very small developing nations.

Keywords: Drug Utilization, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Samoa

INTRODUCTION

There is considerable concern internationally about rising levels of antimicrobial resistance.1,2 Antibiotic resistance has now become a serious problem in many countries, in part because no new classes of antibiotics have been developed for decades.3 Resistance develops wherever antibiotics are used, whether this use is appropriate or inappropriate, but inappropriate use increases resistance without giving benefits to patients.4 There is considerable data available showing inappropriate use in developed countries.5,6,7,8

While studies show high levels of antibiotic use and resistance in some developing countries,9,10,11,12,13 many developing countries lack data on either use or resistance. Carrying out research on drug utilisation in developing countries can sometimes be challenging. In Samoa, there is no published data available on antibiotic consumption or resistance, although it is thought that a strain of community-acquired MRSA originated from Samoa.14 Excessive use of antibiotics, including use for inappropriate conditions, is acknowledged as a problem by health professionals in Samoa. Antibiotics are not legally available without prescription from pharmacies, although in practice they are available. While total consumption of antibiotics is likely to be the critical factor in selecting resistance, under-use through inadequate dosing, and poor adherence by patients may also be important.2 There are anecdotal reports, and interview data (as yet unpublished) suggests that these are also considerable problems in Samoa.

Samoa (formerly known as Western Samoa) consists of two large and some small islands in the South Pacific. The population is about 177,000, and the only city, Apia, is home to about 35,000 people. The health system is largely publicly funded (75.9%), with some contribution from development aid (8.7%).15 Many Samoans migrate to New Zealand, Australia and the USA, and there is substantial movement between these countries. In the latest New Zealand Census (2001) 115,000 Samoan people lived in New Zealand, of whom 58% were born in New Zealand.16 In Australia more than 50,000 people report Samoan ancestry17, and 133,000 people in the US reported Samoan as one of their ethnicities.18 Thus, if levels of antibiotic resistance are high in Samoa, this may have significant implications for the spread of resistance in these other countries.

In Samoa medicines for the public health care system are imported by the Ministry of Health, and then distributed to hospitals and health centres. Private pharmacies import medicines from wholesalers and the private hospital imports some medicines for use by in- and out-patients.

General practitioners do not usually dispense medicines although they may keep small stocks for emergencies, and one GP outside of Apia dispenses. Antibiotics are dispensed to consumers by: the four privately-owned community pharmacies in Apia (there are no private pharmacies outside of Apia); hospital pharmacies (both in-patients and out-patients at one public and one private hospital in Apia, and one public in Tuasivi on the other large island); and by nurses (and occasionally doctors) in other health centres outside Apia and Tuasivi (9 in total). Samoa has a severe shortage of trained personnel, with only about 40 doctors (almost all in Apia or Tuasivi) and seven qualified pharmacists (all based in Apia).

The aim of this study was to gather basic data on levels of antibiotic use in Samoa.

METHODS

Methods used were interviews with healthcare providers and examination of invoices; retrospective record review in hospitals, pharmacies and health centres, and prospective observation in private pharmacies. Ethical approval for the study was given by the Samoa Health Research and Ethics committee.

Total consumption of antibiotics in Samoa was obtained through reviewing invoices, records of orders, and by interviews with healthcare providers (collectively referred to as “ordering data” below). In the public hospital in Apia (which purchases on behalf of all the public health services, and also the dispensing GP) all orders for 2004 were recorded. Invoices for four months were obtained from one private pharmacy (as the basis for estimating yearly use). For the other two private pharmacies who purchase medicines (the fourth is supplied by one of these) and the private hospital, the person responsible for ordering was asked to estimate use of each formulation of each antibiotic for 2004.

Retrospective record review was used to determine: the proportion of prescriptions which included antibiotics, the quantity of antibiotics dispensed per prescription, the number of prescriptions in a one month period, and the overall amount dispensed in a month. Records examined were paper records of prescriptions in pharmacies, and entries into logbooks in health centres (medicines are prescribed and dispensed by the same staff in these centres and paper prescriptions are not used). Data was collected from all outlets for antibiotics in Samoa apart from one private pharmacy, and some rural health centres which have visits from nurse or doctor once a week, and are otherwise staffed by an enrolled nurse who does not prescribe antibiotics.

We aimed to examine all records for the month of November 2004, in order to avoid the Christmas period, when Samoa has a large influx of visitors. There is very little seasonal variation in temperature or weather, so there is no reason to assume that November would be different from other months. However some pharmacies and health centres were not able to show us their records for that period, because these had been discarded or mislaid. In these cases we took whatever period was available after November. In the main hospital we took a simple random sample of prescriptions (every ninth prescription) in November, because the number of prescriptions was unmanageably large. HAN spent several hours helping with dispensing at several of the pharmacies before data collection began, in order to find out how the dispensing was carried out, since it did not always match the prescription (e.g. in the hospital a standard 100ml bottle was dispensed when any quantity of suspension was prescribed).

In the hospitals and private pharmacies paper prescriptions were examined and details of how these would have been dispensed recorded on standard forms. Where necessary we asked pharmacy staff for advice. In the hospitals and private pharmacies we can identify the proportion of prescription clients who received an antibiotic. In the health centres, dispensing is recorded in books, divided into sections for each type of medicine. We recorded all medicines dispensed in our study period, but the organization of these books meant that although we could identify the proportion of medicines which were antibiotics, we could not identify discrete individual patients, and therefore were unable to determine the proportion of clients who received antibiotics.

One health centre recorded all patients seen, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. We collected data on a series of 120 consecutive patients to see what kind of symptoms are presented to rural health centres, and the diagnoses for which antibiotics were dispensed.

Prospective data collection was used to identify the number of patient encounters where antibiotics are dispensed, and the proportion of antibiotic sales which were non-prescription. This took place over one day in each of two private pharmacies.

RESULTS

Ordering data were obtained from all importers of antibiotics. Table 1 shows total consumption for Samoa in 2004 in grams, Defined Daily Doses (DDDs), and DDDs per 1000 inhabitants per day. The percentage of each drug and formulation which was ordered for the public sector is also presented.

Table 1.

Total imported antibiotics, 2004 (oral formulations only)

ATC code Drug Formulation total g DDDs % public DDD/1000 inh-days
J01CA04 Amoxicillin tablets/capsules 784,593 784,593 95.6%
Suspensions 90,800 90,800 82.6%
TOTAL 875,393 875,393 13.55
J01CA01 Ampicillin tablets/capsules 2,000 1,000 0.0% 0.02
J01CR02 Augmentin (co-amoxyclav) tablets/capsules 198,057 198,057 94.7%
Suspensions 24,775 24,775 88.3%
TOTAL 222,832 222,832 3.45
J01FA10 Azithromycin tablets/capsules 452 1,505 0.0% 0.02
J01DC04 Cefaclor tablets/capsules 3,950 3,950 0.0%
J01DC04 Cefaclor Suspensions 8,340 8,340 89.9%
TOTAL 12,290 12,290 0.19
J01DB01 Cephalexin (Keflex) tablets/capsules 26,250 13,125 95.2% 0.20
J01BA01 Chloramphenicol tablets/capsules 32,000 10,667 93.8%
Suspensions 3,965 1,322 94.6%
TOTAL 35,965 11,988 0.19
J01MA02 Ciprofloxacin tablets/capsules 190,475 190,475 98.4% 2.95
J01FF01 Clindamycin tablets/capsules 5 4 0.0% 0.00
JO1CF02 Cloxacillin tablets/capsules 262,000 131,000 95.4%
Suspensions 64,000 32,000 97.7%
TOTAL 326,000 163,000 2.52
Co-trimoxazole tablets/capsules 406,217 94.5%
Suspensions 27,514 87.2%
TOTAL 433,731 180,721 2.80
J01AA02 Doxycycline tablets/capsules 4,660 46,600 0.0% 0.72
J01FA01 Erythromycin tablets/capsules 210,125 210,125 95.2%
Suspensions 27,550 27,550 90.7%
TOTAL 237,675 237,675 3.68
J01CF05 Flucloxacillin tablets/capsules 267,750 133,875 93.4%
Suspensions 36,700 18,350 95.4%
TOTAL 304,450 152,225 2.36
J01XD01 Metronidazole tablets/capsules 169,400 112,933 94.5% 1.75
J01MA06 Norfloxacillin tablets/capsules 260 325 0.0% 0.01
J01CE02 Penicillin V tablets/capsules 177,750 88,875 98.5%
J01CE02 Penicillin V Suspensions 37,685 18,843 99.5%
TOTAL 215,435 107,718 1.67
J01AA07 Tetracycline tablets/capsules 77,750 77,750 80.4% 1.20
TOTAL ANTIBIOTICS 4,190,680 37.27

Almost two-thirds of antibiotics consumed were penicillins (63% of DDDs/1000inh-days). Macrolides made up 9.9% of consumption, quinolones 7.9%, sulphanamides and trimethoprim 7.5%, tetracyclines 5.2%. Consumption of cephalosporins was low (1%), and other antibiotics made up 5.2% of consumption.

Other antibiotic formulations ordered in 2004 were 3748 bottles of eye-drops, 4025 bottles of eardrops and 38,400 tubes of creams. This is the equivalent of one bottle of eye-drops per 47 people, one bottle of ear-drops per 44 people, and one tube of antibiotic cream per 4.6 people.

Table 2 shows data from retrospective record review in the two hospitals, three private pharmacies, and five health centres studied. The percentage of prescriptions containing an antibiotic was similar in hospitals and private pharmacies. Antibiotics were a larger proportion of all items dispensed in health centres, but there was considerable variation between the health centres (range: 28.4 – 73.3).

Table 2.

Dispensing in one month

Healthcare facility Number of prescriptions in one month (a) Percentage of prescriptions containing an antibiotic Number of medicines dispensed Antibiotics as a proportion of medicines dispensed
Main public hospital 5,247 68.3 11,709 29.2
Second public hospital 1,663 58.0 3,823 34.7
HOSPITALS 6,910 65.8 15,613 34.6
Private pharmacy 1 808 68.8 1,637 39.8
Private pharmacy 2 82 80.5 457 50.7
Private pharmacy 3 654 68.2 1,440 38.8
PHARMACIES 1,544 69.2 3,534 36.4
Health centre1 Data unavailable 308 45.8
Health centre 2 Data unavailable 191 73.3
Health centre 3 Data unavailable 457 52.5
Health centre 4 Data unavailable 296 28.4
Health centre 5 Data unavailable 601 35.1
HEALTH CENTRES Data unavailable 1,853 44.0
TOTAL 66.4 34.68

(a)corrected for differences in sampling

Eighty percent of prescriptions examined were for oral dosage forms (tablet, capsules or suspensions). The most commonly dispensed antibiotics were amoxycillin (29.6%) flucloxacillin (15.4%), co-trimoxazole (12.0%), cloxacillin (9.7%), erythromycin (8.3%), augmentin (7.1%), and penicillin V (6.4%). The average length of supply was 6.88 days.

Prospective observation showed that non prescription sale of antibiotics accounted for 24.7% (20/81) of total antibiotic sales on the days studied. The two pharmacies observed sold a similar proportion of antibiotics without prescription (23.8% in one pharmacy, and 25.6% in the other). The average intended length of supply for the over the counter antibiotics was 5.0 days. Flucloxacillin 500mg and tetracycline 250mg were the most common antibiotics purchased over the counter.

Of the 122 patients recorded in the health centre book, 30 (24.6%) were recorded as receiving an antibiotic. Diagnoses were recorded for 29 of these. Seven patients were given antibiotics for wounds, six for upper respiratory tract infections, five for abscesses, two for pneumonia, two for gastritis, one for rheumatic fever, one for otitis media, one for bronchiolitis, one for cellulitis, one for conjunctivitis, one chronic obstructive respiratory disease, and one dermatitis.

DISCUSSION

Data on overall consumption of medicines in DDDs are seldom available from developing countries, because this usually requires a high level of computerization. In developed countries such data are usually obtained from wholesalers or reimbursement systems. Because Samoa is so small it is possible to gather data on overall consumption by requesting it from all those who import medicines, and using paper records. This study found an overall use of antibiotics of 37.3 DDDs per 1000 inhabitant-days in Samoa. This is higher than that reported in any European country. Goossens et al report that in 26 European countries outpatient antibiotic consumption varied from 10.0 DDD per 1000 inhabitant-days in the Netherlands to 32.2 in France.19 They report that outpatient data represents 90 to 94% of all use, and in fact their data includes hospital use in some countries.

Data on antibiotic consumption in developing countries is usually expressed using the WHO/INRUD indicator, percentage of encounters with an antibiotic prescribed.20 In practice researchers often look at the percentage of prescriptions which include an antibiotic. Between 1988 and 2002, published and unpublished studies found that on average 40 to 60% of patients in health facilities in developing countries were prescribed antibiotics.21 Antibiotic use in Samoa also appears to be high by this standard. In public hospitals and private pharmacies, 66.4% of prescriptions included an antibiotic. It seems likely that this figure is even higher in health centres, because antibiotics form a higher proportion of medicines dispensed there. Considerable variation was found between the five health centres studied, and this suggests that prescribers may vary substantially in their prescribing habits.

Both the aggregate consumption data and the prescription analysis suggest a high level of use of penicillins compared to that found in other developing countries. For example in Kenya, penicillins made up only 31% of antibiotic consumption,22 and in a Sri Lankan study 37.7% of all prescriptions, and 42.9% of prescriptions for children were for penicillin.23,24 In a Malaysian study erythromycin was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic in primary care,25 while in Samoa it accounted for only 10% of use expressed in DDDs.

By law, antibiotics are not available over the counter in pharmacies in Samoa. However, in practice, many antibiotics are purchased in this way. This is common in many developing countries. In Samoa, pharmacy staff report selling antibiotics over the counter for a range of reasons, such as patient inability to afford to see a doctor, long waiting times at the hospital, and concern that untreated infections may become serious. Much of the over the counter sale is reported to be for self-treatment for boils. There is little evidence of very short courses of antibiotics being dispensed, as has been reported in other developing countries.26,27 The prevalence of over the counter sales of antibiotics means that studies based on prescriptions are likely to significantly under-estimate the volume of antibiotics sold in pharmacies.

Drug utilization research in developing countries presents some difficulties, and therefore the study methodology varied from the ideal. The destruction or loss of paper records meant that the sampling timeframe varied somewhat in different facilities. Ideally the period of prospective observation in pharmacies would have been longer. Our method of obtaining ordering data relied in two cases on pharmacist or doctor recall of orders (with prompting). However together these form a small proportion of the total consumption. The most significant orderer was the public hospital in Apia and paper records were used there. The final result may still be a slight-underestimate because some supplementary orders by the hospital may not have been recorded. On the other hand volumes in private pharmacies may be slight over-estimates because sometimes people purchase quite large quantities of antibiotics in Samoa to take to New Zealand, where they are not available without a prescription, and are more expensive. The study has shown that in very small developing countries it is possible to calculate total consumption of medicines in DDDs.

The high level of use of antibiotics in Samoa is concerning. Further research is need on resistance levels, and appropriate strategies to reduce antibiotic use should be implemented.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We want to thank all the extremely helpful healthcare providers in Samoa, the Health Research Council of New Zealand for funding HAN’s summer studentship, and the University of Otago for PN’s research and study leave.

Contributor Information

Pauline Norris, School of Pharmacy, University of Otago. Dunedin (New Zealand).

Hong Anh Nguyen, Wanganui Hospital, Whanganui District Health Board. Whanganui (New Zealand).

References

  • 1.Standing Medical Advisory Committee Sub-Group on Antimicrobial Resistance, The Path of Least Resistance. Department of Health (UK); 1998. [accessed 18-02-2007]. URL: http://www.advisorybodies.doh.gov.uk/smac1.htm . [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organisation. Geneve: WHO; 2001. WHO Global Strategy for Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amyes SG. The rise in bacterial resistance is partly because there have been no new classes of antibiotics since the 1960. BMJ. 2000 Jan 22;320(7229):199–200. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7229.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ellis-Pegler RB. Antimicrobial resistance--can we, should we do anything about it? N Z Med J. 1999;112(1096):349–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McGregor A, Dovey S, Tilyard M. Antibiotic use in upper respiratory tract infections in New Zealand. Fam Pract. 1995 Jun;12(2):166–70. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.2.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kljakovic M, Durham J. Sore throat diagnosis and management in a general practice after-hours service. N Z Fam Physician. 1999;26(6):47–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.van Duijn HJ, Kuyvenhoven MM, Schellevis FG, Verheij TJ. Determinants of prescribing of second-choice antibiotics for upper and lower respiratory tract episodes in Dutch general practice. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56(2):420–2. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mazzaglia G, Caputi AP, Rossi A, Bettoncelli G, Stefanini G, Ventriglia G, Nardi R, Brignoli O, Cricelli C. Exploring patient- and doctor-related variables associated with antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections in primary care. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;59(8-9):651–7. doi: 10.1007/s00228-003-0669-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schorling JB, De Souza MA, Guerrant RL. Patterns of antibiotic use among children in an urban Brazilian slum. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20(1):293–9. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.1.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Larsson M, Kronvall G, Chuc NT, Karlsson I, Lager F, Hanh HD, Tomson G, Falkenberg T. Antibiotic medication and bacterial resistance to antibiotics: a survey of children in a Vietnamese community. Trop Med Int Health. 2000;5(10):711–21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2000.00630.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Thamlikitkul V. Antibiotic dispensing by drug store personnel in Bangkok, Thailand. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jan;21(1):125–31. doi: 10.1093/jac/21.1.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Montefiore D, Rotimi VO, Adeyemi-Doro FA. The problem of bacterial resistance to antibiotics among strains isolated from hospital patients in Lagos and Ibadan, Nigeria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989;23(4):641–51. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.4.641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Okumura J, Wakai S, Umenai T. Drug utilisation and self-medication in rural communities in Vietnam. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(12):1875–86. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00155-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Smith JM, Cook GM. A decade of community MRSA in New Zealand. Epidemiol Infect. 2005 Oct;133(5):899–904. doi: 10.1017/S0950268805004024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.World Health Organisation. Geneve: WHO; 2005. Core Health Indicators from the World Health Report: WHOSIS. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Statistics New Zealand, Pacific Profiles - Samoan [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian Social Trends: Population - Population characteristics: Ancestry of Australia’s Population. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2003 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.US Census, Tongan Population: Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. 2000 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Goossens H, Ferech M, Vander Stichele R, Elseviers M ESAC Project Group. Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database study. Lancet. 2005;365(9459):579–87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17907-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.World Health Organisation. Geneve: World Health Organisation; 1993. Department of Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy. How to investigate drug use in health facilities: selected drug use indicators; p. 87. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Holloway K, Ivanovska V. Chaing Mai, Thailand: 2004. Measuring use of medicines: progress in the last decade. in ICIUM (International Conference on Improving the Use of Medicines) [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mitema ES, Kikuvi GM. Surveillance of the overall use of antimicrobial drugs in humans over a 5 year period (1997-2001) in Kenya. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 Nov;54(5):966–7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Angunawela II, Diwan VK, Tomson G. Experimental evaluation of the effects of drug information on antibiotic prescribing: a study in outpatient care in an area of Sri lanka. Int J Epidemiol. 1991 Jun;20(2):558–64. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.2.558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tomson G, Diwan V, Angunawela I. Paediatric prescribing in out-patient care. An example from Sri Lanka. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;39(5):469–73. doi: 10.1007/BF00280938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Teng CL, Achike FI, Phua KL, Norhayati Y, Nurjahan MI, Nor AH, Koh CN. General and URTI-specific antibiotic prescription rates in a Malaysian primary care setting. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;24(5):496–501. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chalker J, Ratanawijitrasin S, Chuc NT, Petzold M, Tomson G. Effectiveness of a multi-component intervention on dispensing practices at private pharmacies in Vietnam and Thailand--a randomized controlled trial. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(1):131–41. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wolffers I. Drug information and sale practices in some pharmacies of Colombo, Sri Lanka. Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(3):319–21. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90234-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Pharmacy Practice are provided here courtesy of Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas

RESOURCES