Abstract
Haemophilus parasuis is a normal commensal of the upper respiratory tract of healthy pigs. However, in conjunction with stress and/or viral infections, or in immunocompromised animals, H. parasuis can transform into a pathogen causing Glasser’s disease, which is typically characterized by fibrinous polyserositis, polyarthritis, meningitis, and sometimes acute pneumonia and septicemia. H. parasuis serotype 5 is highly virulent and more frequently isolated from respiratory and systemic infection in pigs. Recently Newport Laboratories isolated highly virulent H. parasuis serotype 4 strains from the tissues of diseased pigs. This study was undertaken to identify the genes responsible for H. parasuis serotype 4 virulence. To achieve this objective we performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) across two virulent and three avirulent H. parasuis serotype 4 strains.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Haemophilus parasuis is Gram-negative, nonmotile, nonhemolytic, pleomorphic and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)-dependent bacterium (1, 2). It is a normal commensal of the upper respiratory tract of healthy pigs (3, 4). However, during stress in immunocompromised animals, H. parasuis transforms into a pathogen and causes Glasser’s disease, which is typically characterized by fibrinous polyserositis, polyarthritis, meningitis, and sometimes acute pneumonia and septicemia (3–5). This disease is one of the primary causes of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. and swine industry worldwide, resulting in substantial economic losses.
To date, 15 different serotypes of H. parasuis have been identified based on the presence of heat stable antigens and gel diffusion tests. However, a high percentage of the field isolates are nontypable (6). Among the 15 serotypes, H. parasuis serotype 5 is more frequently isolated from respiratory and systemic infections in pigs thus, appears to be highly virulent (7, 8). During the past few years, Newport Laboratories has observed an increase in the number of cases of H. parasuis serotype 4 infections (ST4) in the U.S. Surveys in the past have indicated that H. parasuis serotype 4 is an emerging pathogen in the U.S. swine population with a potential to cause serious outbreaks (9). In an attempt to understand the differences between virulent and avirulent H. parasuis ST4, we performed a genome-wide association studies (GWAS) across two virulent and three avirulent strains.
H. parasuis ST4 virulent strains (ST4-1 and ST4-2) and the avirulent strains (HPS9, HPS10, and HPS11) were cultured on Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA) plates supplemented with 5% bovine serum and 10 mg/ml nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD). Bacterial cells were scrapped from the plates, pelleted, and the genomic DNA was extracted using a bacterial genomic DNA isolation kit (Edge Biosystems). The genomic DNA library was generated by a TruSeq Library preparation kit (Illumina, Inc.) following the manufacturer’s recommendation and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq to obtain 150 bp paired-end (PE) reads. Whole-genome sequencing was performed at the University of Minnesota Genomics Center and University of Washington. Serotype identity of all the H. parasuis strains isolated in this study was confirmed by the Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montréal.
GWAS identified phage and hypothetical proteins unique to each isolate and each phenotypic group. The virulent strains encode exclusive proteins such as maltose acetyltransferase (HPS41_00460, HPS42_04310), peptidoglycan-binding protein LysM (HPS41_01895, HPS42_11245), peptidase S14 (HPS41_08645, HPS42_07140), guanine-1-methyltransferase (HPS41_09075, HPS42_02465), S/T phosphatase (HPS41_00405, HPS42_10265), and a tRNA-Arg (HPS41_00420, HPS42_10250). It is striking to note that ST4-1 and ST4-2 lack silalytransferase (CMP-N-acetylneuraminate-beta-galactosamide- alpha-2, 3-sialyltransferase), an enzyme critical for sialylation of terminal N-acetyllactosamine trisaccharide during lipo-oligosaccharide (LOS) synthesis. Lacking sialyltransferase could reduce the amount of sialic acid on the cell surface and can cause hypersensitive reactions in the host. In contrast, all avirulent strains encode sialyltransferase (HPS9_01535, HPSM10_00215, HPSM11_05065). Few of the functional proteins exclusive to avirulent strains include; preprotein translocase subunit SecG (HPS9_01510, HPSM10_08005, HPSM11_00325), metal-dependent hydrolase (HPS9_02995, HPS10_04690, HPS11_08015), cell filamentation protein Fic (HPS9_03915, HPSM10_10285, HPSM11_09710), and VbhA antitoxin and related proteins (HPS9_03920, HPS10_10280, HPS11_09715).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers JJNQ00000000 (ST4-1), JJNR00000000 (ST4-2), JDSN00000000 (HPS9), JDSO00000000 (HPS10), and JDSP00000000 (HPS11). The versions described in this paper are JJNQ00000000.1, JJNR00000000.1, JDSN00000000.1, JDSO00000000.1, and JDSP00000000.1, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by funds provided by Newport Laboratories Research and Development Department.
This document is provided for scientific purposes only. Any reference to a brand or trademark herein is for informational purposes only and is not intended for a commercial purpose or to dilute the rights of the respective owner(s) of the brand(s) or trademark(s).
Footnotes
Citation Lawrence PK, Wiener BL, Kolander-Bremer T, Bey RF, Stine DL, Kittichotirat W, Bumgarner RE. 2014. Genome-wide association studies of virulent and avirulent Haemophilus parasuis serotype 4 strains. Genome Announc. 2(5):e00884-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00884-14.
REFERENCES
- 1. Biberstein EL, White DC. 1969. A proposal for the establishment of two new Haemophilus species. J. Med. Microbiol. 2:75–77. 10.1099/00222615-2-1-75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Nicolet J. 1992. Haemophilus parasuis, p 526–528 In Diseases of Swine. 7th ed. Leman AD, Straw BE, Mengeling WL, D’Allaire S, Taylor DJ. (ed). Iowa State Press, Ames, Iowa [Google Scholar]
- 3. Amano H, Shibata M, Kajio N, Morozumi T. 1994. Pathologic observations of pigs intranasally inoculated with serovar 1, 4 and 5 of Haemophilus parasuis using immunoperoxidase method. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 56:639–644. 10.1292/jvms.56.639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Peet RL, Fry J, Lloyd J, Henderson J, Curran J, Moir D. 1983. Haemophilus parasuis septicemia in pigs. Aust. Vet. J. 60:187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Little TW. 1970. Haemophilus infection in pigs. Vet. Rec. 87:399–402. 10.1136/vr.87.14.399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kielstein P, Rapp-Gabrielson VJ. 1992. Designation of 15 serovars of Haemophilus parasuis on the basis of immunodiffusion using heat-stable antigen extracts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:862–865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rapp-Gabrielson VJ, Gabrielson DA. 1992. Prevalence of Haemophilus parasuis serovars among isolates from swine. Am. J. Vet. Res. 53:659–664 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Blackall PJ, Rapp-Gabrielson VJ, Hampson DJ. 1996. Serological characterisation of Haemophilus parasuis isolates from Australian pigs. Aust. Vet. J. 73:93–95. 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1996.tb09984.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tadjine M, Mittal KR, Bourdon S, Gottschalk M. 2004. Development of a new serological test for serotyping Haemophilus parasuis isolates and determination of their prevalence in North America. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:839–840. 10.1128/JCM.42.2.839-840.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]