Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
. 2014 Sep 5;8:273. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00273

Viral vector-mediated downregulation of RhoA increases survival and axonal regeneration of retinal ganglion cells

Jan Christoph Koch 1,*, Lars Tönges 1, Uwe Michel 1, Mathias Bähr 1,2, Paul Lingor 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC4155783  PMID: 25249936

Abstract

The Rho/ROCK pathway is a promising therapeutic target in neurodegenerative and neurotraumatic diseases. Pharmacological inhibition of various pathway members has been shown to promote neuronal regeneration and survival. However, because pharmacological inhibitors are inherently limited in their specificity, shRNA-mediated approaches can add more information on the function of each single kinase involved. Thus, we generated adeno-associated viral vectors (AAV) to specifically downregulate Ras homologous member A (RhoA) via shRNA. We found that specific knockdown of RhoA promoted neurite outgrowth of retinal ganglion cells (RGC) grown on the inhibitory substrate chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG) as well as neurite regeneration of primary midbrain neurons (PMN) after scratch lesion. In the rat optic nerve crush (ONC) model in vivo, downregulation of RhoA significantly enhanced axonal regeneration compared to control. Moreover, survival of RGC transduced with AAV expressing RhoA-shRNA was substantially increased at 2 weeks after optic nerve axotomy. Compared to previous data using pharmacological inhibitors to target RhoA, its upstream regulator Nogo or its main downstream target ROCK, the specific effects of RhoA downregulation shown here were most pronounced in regard to promoting RGC survival but neurite outgrowth and axonal regeneration were also increased significantly. Taken together, we show here that specific knockdown of RhoA substantially increases neuronal survival after optic nerve axotomy and modestly increases neurite outgrowth in vitro and axonal regeneration after optic nerve crush.

Keywords: RhoA, axonal regeneration, retinal ganglion cells, optic nerve crush, axotomy, neuronal survival, RNAi

Introduction

Neuronal cell death, axonal degeneration and regenerative failure are the central pathological hallmarks of most traumatic and neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). As these pathomechanisms usually occur concurrently and influence each other, therapeutic approaches should optimally address molecular targets that act on all of these processes. Based on growing evidence, the Rho/ROCK/LIMK-pathway appears to be an excellent candidate to fulfill these criteria (Mueller et al., 2005; Tönges et al., 2011a). However, it is not clear which pathway members are most suitable to be targeted to address specific pathological mechanisms.

The Rho/ROCK/LIMK-pathway is activated by several extracellular growth-inhibitory signals, including Nogo, ephrins (Shamah et al., 2001) and semaphorins (Dontchev and Letourneau, 2003; Lin et al., 2007). Their signaling is mediated through different transmembrane receptors, e.g., the ephrin receptor and the trimeric NogoR/p75/Lingo1 receptor complex. These receptors lead to an activation of Ras homologous member A (RhoA; Wahl et al., 2000), which finally results in growth cone collapse and retraction of neurites (Jalink et al., 1994; Mackay et al., 1995; Tigyi et al., 1996; Katoh et al., 1998; Gu et al., 2013). One of the best-characterized downstream targets of RhoA is the Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase (ROCK) that is activated by RhoA (Ishizaki et al., 1997). ROCK itself has several downstream targets that affect both neuronal survival and actin cytoskeleton, including phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), myosin light chain kinase and LIM domain kinase (LIMK; Endo et al., 2003; Tönges et al., 2011a). LIMK phosphorylates and thereby inactivates the actin-depolymerizing factor cofilin which leads to decreased actin turnover and growth cone collapse (Arber et al., 1998). Next to its functions in developmental axon guidance (Luo, 2000), the Rho/ROCK/LIMK-cascade also plays an important role after traumatic lesions of the CNS when it mediates inhibition of axonal regeneration (Moreau-Fauvarque et al., 2003; Mueller et al., 2005). Another downstream target of RhoA is mammalian diaphanous (mDia) which acts on actin and tubulin polymerization independently of ROCK (Watanabe et al., 1997; Luo, 2000).

The involvement of RhoA in retinal ganglion cell (RGC) pathology has been demonstrated previously. Expression levels of RhoA increased significantly in the retina within 7 days after rat optic nerve crush (ONC; Wang et al., 2007) and in the RGC-layer within 8 days after rat optic nerve infarction (Fard et al., 2013). In human glaucoma patients, increased RhoA-protein-levels were observed in the optic nerve head compared to healthy age-matched controls (Goldhagen et al., 2012).

Several groups have assessed the effects of Rho-inhibition in vitro and in different animal models (Donovan et al., 1997; Mills et al., 1998; Lehmann et al., 1999; Monnier et al., 2003; Fischer et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2007; Julien et al., 2008), mostly with positive effects regarding neurite outgrowth and axonal regeneration. To inhibit Rho, all of these studies have used the C3 enzyme from Clostridium botulinum that inactivates Rho by ADP-ribosylation (Rubin et al., 1988; Udagawa and McIntyre, 1996). However, C3 is not specific for RhoA, but also modifies the Rho isoforms RhoB and RhoC (Just et al., 2011). Moreover, C3 was shown to activate microglia and trigger the release of nitric oxide and several proinflammatory cyto- and chemokines independently of RhoA/ROCK-activation (Hoffmann et al., 2008). It also acts on astrocytes inducing glial scar formation (Just et al., 2011).

In the present study, we use short hairpin RNA (shRNA) against RhoA expressed by adeno-associated viral vectors (AAV) to specifically analyze the effects of RhoA downregulation in models of neuronal de- and regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Extending our recently published work on the effects of specific downregulation of ROCK2 and LIMK1 (Koch et al., 2014), we provide important evidence on the functions and therapeutic potential of RhoA, one of their upstream regulators.

Material and methods

Cloning, production and testing of AAV

Adeno-associated viral vectors were produced based on the previously published vectors pAAV-9(5)hSyn-DsRed-H1-EGFP-shRNA (= pAAV-Si-I (GenBank ID: AY6406334, Michel et al., 2005)) and pAAV-9(5)hSyn-DsRed-H1-RhoA-shRNA3 (Malik et al., 2006). The shRNA sense sequence was AAGCTGACCCTGAAGTTCA for the EGFP-shRNA and CTATGTGGCAGATATTGAA GT for the RhoA-shRNA.

AAV were produced as reported before (Koch et al., 2011a). Briefly, 293-HEK cells were transfected with the specific plasmid mix (for AAV2: pAAV expression vector, pAAV-RC and pHELPER (both from Stratagene, Amsterdam, Netherlands) in a 1:1:1 molar ratio; for AAV2/1: pAAV expression vector, pHELPER, pAAV-RC and pH21 in a 1:1:0.5:0.5 molar ratio) under addition of calcium phosphate and HEPES buffered saline. Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection, and AAV were purified by dialysis and virus gradient centrifugation in iodixanol. To obtain high titer viral stocks, we performed fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC). Virus stocks were tested on primary cortical neurons for transduction efficacy and toxicity and viral titers were determined using qPCR. Based on previous comparisons of different AAV-serotypes (Koch et al., 2013), we used the serotype AAV2/1 for all in vitro experiments whereas all in vivo experiments were performed with AAV2.

Efficacy of RhoA downregulation was assessed in rat primary hippocampal cell culture that was prepared as described elsewhere (Audesirk et al., 2001). Neurons were transduced on day in vitro (DIV) 1 with AAV in a concentration of 1 × 108 transforming units (TU) per well. On DIV 7, cells were lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (10 mM Hepes, 142 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl, 2.1 mM EGTA, IGEPAL, protease and phosphatase inhibitor and dithiothreitol). Cell lysates were sonicated, resolved on SDS-PAGE and blotted on a nitrocellulose membrane. For further standard Western Blot processing, the following antibodies were used: rabbit polyclonal anti-dsRed (Clontech, Heidelberg, Germany), mouse monoclonal anti-RhoA (26C4) (sc-418, Santa Cruz, Heidelberg, Germany) and mouse monoclonal anti-β-tubulin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). As secondary antibodies, we used horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse antibodies (Santa Cruz). Bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL-solution: 250 mM Luminol, 90 mM p-coumaric acid, 1 M Tris / HCl, 30% hydrogen peroxide) and quantified with ImageJ software1 (open freeware provided by the NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) (3 independent protein lysates).

Primary retinal ganglion cells (RGC) and evaluation of neurite outgrowth

Retinal ganglion cells were prepared from 7 days old Wistar rat pups as described before (Koch et al., 2011a). Retinal ganglion cells were enriched to 99.5% purity using a two-step panning protocol for Thy-1 (Barres et al., 1988). Cells were plated in 24-well-plates in a density of 4000 cells per well in RGC medium composed of serum-free neurobasal medium (Gibco, Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with sodium-pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich, Seelze, Germany), glutamine, N-acetyl-cysteine, triiodothyronine, Sato (BSA, transferrin, progesterone, putrescine, sodium selenite; Gibco), forskolin (final concentration 10 mM), human BDNF (final concentration 50 ng/ml; Tebu, Offenbach, Germany), insulin (final concentration 5 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich), CNTF (final concentration 10 ng/ml; Tebu) and B27 supplement. Coverslips (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) were coated with poly-D-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) and either laminin (20 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) or chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG; 50 μg/ml; major components: neurocan, aggrecan, phosphacan and versican; Chemicon; Darmstadt, Germany).

For viral transduction, the medium was reduced to 250 μl per well at 4 h after seeding and AAV were added in a concentration of 5 × 107 TU per well. After 24 h, 250 μl fresh medium were added to each well. Transduction efficacy of RGCs (>90% after DIV 3) and possible virus toxicity (<10% cell death until DIV 5) were monitored regularly.

To assess neurite outgrowth, micrographs of four randomly chosen visual fields per well of five wells per group were taken on DIV 5 with an inverted microscope (Axiovert, Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). On the micrographs, the total neurite length per view field was quantified using the neurite tracing module of the ImageJ plugin NeuronJ (Meijering et al., 2004) and then divided by the number of neurons per view field to obtain the mean neurite length per RGC. Results from two independent experiments were statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test with significance at p < 0.05.

Primary midbrain neurons (PMN) and scratch assay

Primary midbrain neurons were prepared from embryonic day 14 Wistar rats as described previously (Lingor et al., 1999). Cells were seeded in a density of 4 × 105 neurons/cm2 on poly-L-ornithine/laminin-coated cover slips in PMN-medium (composed of DMEM F12, glucose, BSA, penicillin/streptomycin/neomycin, N1, glutamin and insulin; all Sigma). Four hours after seeding, AAV were added in a concentration of 0.5 × 108 TU per well. On DIV 3, a scratch assay was performed as described before (Tönges et al., 2011b). In brief, a custom-made 2 mm broad silicon rubber scratch device was scratched once across each coverslip. Successful transection of all neurites along the scratch border was verified under a microscope. Following the scratch lesion, half of the medium was exchanged. On DIV 6, the cells were fixed in 4% PFA and a standard immunocytochemistry against tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) was performed (primary antibody: rabbit anti-TH (AB152; Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany); secondary antibody: cy3-labelled mouse anti-rabbit (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany)). Micrographs were taken along both scratch borders with a 20× objective using an Axioplan microscope equipped with a 16-bit grayscale CCD camera and AxioVision 4.6 software (Zeiss). On each micrograph, the lengths of the 10 longest neurites growing across the scratch border were determined using the ImageJ plugin NeuronJ. Per group, 10 micrographs were evaluated. Experiments were repeated in three independent PMN-cultures. Results were statistically evaluated using Student’s t-test with significance at p < 0.05.

Animal experiments

All animal experiments were performed according to the regulations of the local animal research council and legislation of the State of Lower Saxony, Germany. Adult female Wistar rats (200–300 g, Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) were used for all animal experiments. All surgical procedures (intravitreal virus injection, optic nerve crush, stereotactical injection, axotomy) were performed under deep anesthesia with 10% ketamine (95 mg/kg body weight) and 2% xylazine (7 mg/kg body weight) injected intraperitoneally.

Intravitreal virus injection, optic nerve crush and GAP43 immunohistochemistry

AAV.EGFP-shRNA or AAV.RhoA-shRNA (1 × 109 TU in 5 μl) were injected intravitreally with a Hamilton syringe as described before (Koch et al., 2011b). An ONC was performed 3 weeks after intravitreal injections as described previously (Koch et al., 2011b). In brief, the orbita was accessed after incision along the orbital rim. After moving the lacrimal gland to the front, the eye bulb was slightly rotated to the side by pulling the superior rectus muscle. Then, the optic nerve was fully exposed by removing the surrounding tissue. A 10-0 polyamide suture (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA) was constricted around the optic nerve for 30 s at a distance of 1.5 mm from its insertion into the eye bulb. Next, the suture was removed and all tissue put back in situ. Twenty eight days after ONC, animals were perfused transcardially with 4% PFA and the optic nerve and eye bulb were resected and post-fixed in 4% PFA for 1 h. The retina was flat-mounted in 30% glycerol to assess viral transduction efficacy, which was 20–50% of all RGC. Three animals were excluded from further analysis due to transduction rates <20%. The optic nerves were cryo-protected in 30% sucrose for 48 h and then cryo-sectioned longitudinally (thickness: 16 μm). Cryosections were stained with standard immunohistochemistry methods against GAP43 (monoclonal antibody, Abcam). Cy2-labeled secondary antibodies (Dianova) were used and sections were counter-stained with DAPI (Sigma) and mounted in Moviol (Hoechst). All optic nerve sections were photographed with an Axioplan microscope equipped with AxioVision Software (Zeiss). The number of GAP43 positive axons was counted at defined distances from the crush site. The crush site could be clearly localized due to scar formation and high cell density in the DAPI-stain. For statistical analysis, the numbers of axons at a given distance from the crush site were compared between both groups using the Wilcoxon (Mann-White) test for unpaired data with significance at p < 0.05.

Axotomy of the optic nerve

For axotomy experiments, AAV were injected intravitreally as described above. Three weeks later, the optic nerve was exposed as described above for the ONC and then transsected at 2 mm from the posterior eye pole taking special care not to damage the retinal blood supply. To retrogradely label the RGCs, a 2 mm × 2 mm piece of gel foam (Braun, Melsungen, Germany) was soaked in FluoroGold® (Hydroxystilbamidine; Bio-Trend, Cologne, Germany) and placed on the optic nerve stump. At 14 days after axotomy, the animals were perfused and the retinas flat-mounted as described above. Further examinations were performed under an Axioplan microscope (Zeiss). Using 2.5× and 10× magnifications, the retina was subdivided into transduced and non-transduced areas. For each area-type, four 40× magnification view fields were evaluated at similar distances from the optic disc. Fluorogold®-labeled RGC were counted using a UV filter (365/420 nm). RGC were discriminated from other Fluorogold-positive cells (microglia, macrophages etc.) by morphological criteria (soma size, form of processes). For EGFP-shRNA n = 7 animals were evaluated, for RhoA-shRNA n = 8 animals were evaluated. Data were evaluated statistically using Wilcoxon (Mann-White) test for unpaired data with significance at p < 0.05.

Results

Downregulation of RhoA

Based on previous testing (Malik et al., 2006), we chose the most potent and specific AAV.shRNA to downregulate RhoA under the control of the H1 promoter and co-expressing the fluorophore dsRed under the control of the human synapsin promoter. As control, we employed the same vector expressing an shRNA against EGFP (Koch et al., 2011a, 2014) (vector maps are shown in Figure 1A). Specific downregulation of the target protein RhoA was confirmed by immunoblot of protein lysates from AAV-transduced primary hippocampal neuron cultures. Transduction with AAV.RhoA-shRNA resulted in a significant downregulation of RhoA expression levels to 35 ± 0.18% compared to AAV.EGFP-shRNA which was set 100% (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

AAV.shRNA-mediated downregulation of RhoA. (A) Vector maps of AAV.RhoA-shRNA and the control-vector AAV.EGFP-shRNA. The shRNAs are expressed under the control of an H1 promoter and the fluorophore dsRed is expressed under the control of a human synapsin-1 promoter. ITR: AAV-2 inverted terminal repeat. Int: intron. SV40-pA: SV40 polyadenylation site. (B) Immunoblots for RhoA and dsRed of primary hippocampal neurons transduced with AAV.RhoA-shRNA or AAV.EGFP-shRNA (n = 3 independent protein lysates per group; bars represent means ± SEM: * p < 0.05 according to Student’s t-test).

Inhibition of neurite outgrowth by CSPG is counteracted by downregulation of RhoA

RhoA has been reported to be a key intracellular mediator of repulsive signaling from surrounding glia cells on the growing axon (Luo, 2000). To simulate the inhibitory environment present in the adult mammalian CNS, we cultured rat primary RGC on the growth-inhibiting substrate CSPG, which contains some of the key inhibiting molecules produced by glial cells of the CNS in vivo (Niederöst et al., 1999). As control, RGC were cultured on the growth permissive coating laminin. On DIV 5, the mean neurite length per neuron was measured for RGC on both coatings with or without viral transduction. There was no significant difference between the untreated RGC (mean neurite length per cell: 1761 ± 92 μm) and RGC transduced with AAV.EGFP-shRNA (1998 ± 101 μm) on laminin. In contrast to RGC cultured on laminin, neurite growth on CSPG-coating was significantly reduced in untreated RGC (mean neurite length 604 ± 56 μm) and RGC transduced with AAV.EGFP-shRNA (689 ± 120 μm). This inhibition of neurite outgrowth was partly rescued by transduction with AAV.RhoA-shRNA, which led to a significantly increased mean neurite length (1240 ± 85 μm) compared to AAV.EGFP-shRNA-treated controls (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Downregulation of RhoA partly rescues the inhibitory effects of CSPG on neurite outgrowth in RGC. (A) Representative micrographs of RGC on DIV 5 without AAV-treatment (untreated) or transduced with AAV.EGFP-shRNA or AAV.RhoA-shRNA (AAV-expressed dsRed). Neurites of the RGC without treatment or transduced with AAV.EGFP-shRNA are clearly shorter on the non-permissive substrate CSPG (on the right side) as compared to laminin (on the left side). In contrast, RGC transduced with AAV.RhoA-shRNA grow long neurites on CSPG. (B) Quantification of the mean neurite length per RGC transduced with the given AAV or untreated and plated either on laminin or CSPG (n = 2 RGC-cultures; quantification of 20 fields of view per group and experiment; bars represent means ± SEM; ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.001, according to one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test).

Neurite regeneration after scratch lesion is improved by RhoA-shRNA

Neurites in the CNS exhibit an insufficient regeneration capacity after traumatic or biochemical lesion, e.g., by oxidative stress, which has relevance for the pathogenesis of numerous neurological disorders. To mimic this situation, we performed a scratch assay in rat PMN (Tönges et al., 2011b). Primary midbrain neurons were transduced with AAV.EGFP-shRNA or AAV.RhoA-shRNA and on DIV 3 a mechanical neurite transection was performed using a special rubber device that was scratched across the cover slip 3 days later, cells were fixed and stained against TH to identify dopaminergic neurons. Micrographs were taken along the scratch border and the length of the 10 longest TH-positive neurites growing across the scratch border was assessed. The mean length of these regenerating neurites was significantly increased in the neurons transduced with RhoA-shRNA (538 ± 16 μm) as compared to EGFP-shRNA (387 ± 14 μm; Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Rho-shRNA enhances neurite regeneration after mechanical scratch lesion. (A) Representative micrographs of primary midbrain neurons (PMN) transduced with AAV expressing the respective shRNA given on top and immunostained against tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). Photos were taken on DIV 6, 72 h after mechanical scratch lesion. The scratch border is shown at the bottom on each picture with neurites growing across the scratch. (B) Quantification showing the mean lengths of the 10 longest TH-positive neurites crossing the scratch border after transduction with AAV expressing the shRNAs given below. Data are given as means ± SEM. ** P < 0.005 according to Student’s t-test; (n = 3 independent PMN-cultures; quantification of 10 × 10 neurites per group per culture, i.e., in total 300 neurites per condition).

Downregulation of RhoA promotes axonal regeneration after optic nerve crush

Next, we analyzed the effects of RhoA downregulation on axonal regeneration in vivo. AAV.EGFP-shRNA or AAV.RhoA-shRNA were injected intravitreally in adult female Wistar rats. Three weeks after intravitreal injection, a crush lesion of the optic nerve (ONC) was performed as described before (Koch et al., 2011b). The animals were sacrificed 3 weeks later and the optic nerves were immunostained with an antibody against GAP43 to specifically identify regenerating axons (Schaden et al., 1994). The number of GAP43-positive axons was quantified at increasing distances from the crush site (Figures 4A,B). Transduction with AAV.RhoA-shRNA resulted in a significant increase of regenerating axons that had crossed the lesion site compared to AAV.EGFP-shRNA (n = 10 optic nerves per group). This effect was, however, limited to the area close to the crush as no regenerating axons could be observed at distances >600 μm from the crush site in neither group. The number of GAP43-positive axons at 100 μm proximal to the crush site was also increased significantly in the optic nerves transduced with AAV.RhoA-shRNA as compared to AAV.EGFP-shRNA, indicating increased stability of RGC axons following crush lesion (mean number of GAP43-positive neurites per section: EGFP-shRNA: 19 ± 3; RhoA-shRNA: 38 ± 4; Figure 4C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Knockdown of RhoA increases axonal regeneration after optic nerve crush. (A) Representative composite photos of optic nerves transduced with AAV.EGFP-shRNA or AAV.RhoA-shRNA and immunostained for GAP43. AAV were injected intravitreally 14 days before crush lesion. Optic nerve sections were obtained 28 days after crush. White arrow-heads point at regenerating (GAP43-positive) axons. (B) Quantification of the number of GAP43-positive axons at different distances from the crush site (n = 10 optic nerves per group; bars represent means ± SEM; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005 according to Student’s t-test). (C) Quantification of the number of GAP43-positive axons at 100 μm proximal to the crush site shows a significant increase only for the optic nerves transduced with AAV.RhoA-shRNA (n = 10 optic nerves per group; bars represent means ± SEM; * p < 0.05, according to Wilcoxon (Mann-White) test for unpaired data).

RGC survival after optic nerve axotomy is improved by downregulation of RhoA

To test possible pro-survival effects of RhoA-downregulation in vivo, we employed the optic nerve axotomy model in adult female Wistar rats. AAV.EGFP-shRNA or AAV.RhoA-shRNA were injected intravitreally. Three weeks later, a complete axotomy of the optic nerve was performed and RG were labeled by application of FluoroGold® to the optic nerve stump. After another 2 weeks, the number of FluoroGold®-labeled RGC was quantified on retinal flat-mounts (Figure 5). Viral transduction rates were similar for both groups: transduced (dsRed-positive) RGC in percent of all (FluoroGold®-positive) RGC: AAV.EGFP-shRNA: 45%, RhoA-shRNA 53% (p = 0.534, Student’s t-test). To specifically assess effects of the AAV-treatment and to avoid a possible bias caused by differences of RGC numbers between animals and different regions of the retina, we defined four regions per retina that were not transduced by the AAV and directly compared the respective RGC-numbers of these regions with four AAV-transduced regions of the same retina in a similar distance from the optic disc (Figure 5A). Transduction with AAV.RhoA-shRNA resulted in a significantly increased number of RGC (149 ± 27%) compared to AAV.EGFP-shRNA (104 ± 3%; p = 0.012, Student’s t-test; Figure 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

RhoA-shRNA increases RGC survival after optic nerve axotomy. (A) Composite figure explaining the evaluation method used to assess RGC-survival after optic nerve axotomy. Retina flat mounts were obtained 14 days after transection of the optic nerve. Per retina, four view fields were evaluated in a region that was not transduced by the AAV (dashed circles in the left micrograph) and directly compared to four view fields in an AAV-transduced region (dashed circles on the right micrograph) of the same retina in a similar distance from the optic disc. (B) Representative micrographs of transduced view fields from retina flat mounts transduced with the given AAV in red and Fluorogold positive cells in blue. (C) Quantification of the number of Fluorogold-positive RGC given in percent of AAV.EGFP-shRNA control (set to 100%) (n = 7 retinas for AAV.EGFP-shRNA and n = 8 retinas for AAV.RhoA-shRNA; bars represent means ± SEM; * p < 0.05 according to Wilcoxon (Mann-White) test for unpaired data).

Discussion

Accumulating evidence suggests that modulation of the Rho/ROCK/LIMK pathway has favorable therapeutic effects in several neurological diseases (Mueller et al., 2005; Tönges et al., 2011a, 2012; Koch et al., 2014). In the present study we analyzed the therapeutic value of the specific knockdown of RhoA in CNS neurons with regards to axonal regeneration and neuronal survival.

We demonstrate that knockdown of RhoA partly rescues CSPG-induced inhibition of neurite outgrowth in RGC in vitro, increases neurite regeneration of dopaminergic neurons after scratch lesion in vitro and moderately enhances axonal regeneration after ONC in vivo. These results extend previous studies employing C3-enzyme in RGC or RhoA-siRNA in other neuronal cells.

In PC12 cells on a permissive substrate, RhoA-shRNA decreased F-actin levels and increased the percentage of neurite-bearing cells, but changes in neurite lengths were not assessed (Fan et al., 2008). RhoA-siRNA abolished semaphorin-3A-induced growth cone collapse in rat dorsal root ganglion cell cultures (Hengst et al., 2006), but no other inhibitory factors were tested in this study. In RGC in vitro, Rho-inhibition by C3-enzyme completely rescued inhibition of neurite growth induced by CSPG (Monnier et al., 2003) or myelin-substrates (Lehmann et al., 1999). In contrast to these reported effects of C3-treatment, the Rho-shRNA in our study only partly rescued the growth-inhibiting effects of CSPG. This might be due to the fact that the downregulation reduced intraneuronal RhoA levels only by 65% compared to normal levels resulting in a significantly reduced but possibly still functionally relevant RhoA-activity. Additionally, C3 unspecifically inhibits all Rho-isoforms including RhoA, RhoB and RhoC (Just et al., 2011) in contrast to the target-specific RhoA-shRNA. As RhoB was also shown to modulate actin and tubulin dynamics in neurons (Mackay et al., 1995), it is possible that the other Rho-isoforms mediate growth-inhibiting effects when specifically RhoA is downregulated. In favor of the latter explanation, we recently found that a similar knockdown efficacy (60–70%) of ROCK2 and LIMK1 was sufficient to completely rescue CSPG-induced neurite growth inhibition in RGC (Koch et al., 2014).

It has to be noted that the in vitro tests for neurite regeneration after scratch lesion were performed in PMN. Due to the low number of neurons in the RGC-cultures it would have been very difficult to induce a reproducible lesion of the neurites in RGC and to statistically evaluate the effects of RhoA-shRNA. The scratch lesion in PMN on the other hand, is a well-established experimental paradigm (Tönges et al., 2011b). Although it represents a different neuronal cell type, it nicely demonstrates in vitro the therapeutic capacity of RhoA-downregulation for neurite regeneration after a traumatic lesion, extending the findings on neurite outgrowth in RGC to another pathological condition and another neuronal cell type. Moreover, these results imply positive effects of RhoA-shRNA in dopaminergic neurons, thus setting the stage for further experiments in models of Parkinson’s disease.

In the ONC model in vivo, the pro-regenerative effects of C3-enzyme applied locally in gelfoam (Lehmann et al., 1999) or expressed by intravitreally injected AAV (Fischer et al., 2004) have been examined previously. Both studies reported moderate pro-regenerative effects of the C3-treatment with increased axonal regeneration up to 500 μm distal to the crush lesion, comparable to our present results. A significantly stronger regenerative response could be induced by concurrent C3-treatment and lens injury (Fischer et al., 2004) or by single knockdown of the RhoA downstream targets ROCK2 and LIMK1 (Koch et al., 2014). The most effective therapeutic approaches to foster axonal regeneration in the optic nerve published so far address the PTEN and mTOR pathway (de Lima et al., 2012). Interestingly, there is a putative molecular link between the RhoA-downstream target ROCK2 and PTEN (Tönges et al., 2011a). Comparing the amount and length of regenerating axons of our present study to these previous results, the effects of specific RhoA-downregulation are clearly less pronounced than PTEN and mTOR modulation or C3-treatment and additional lens injury. In line with our results in the optic nerve, RhoA-siRNA applied by intraspinal injections or lumbar puncture had only minor positive effects on motorical outcome in a rat spinal cord injury model although improved sensory function and white matter preservation were reported (Otsuka et al., 2011).

We conclude that the neurite-growth-inhibiting signals in vivo employ additional other pathways next to RhoA and that targeting RhoA alone is not sufficient to promote a substantial regenerative response after axonal lesions in the CNS in vivo, especially taking into account the more promising previous results employing specific ROCK2- or PTEN-inhibition.

We further report here, that RhoA-shRNA significantly increased survival of RGC after optic nerve axotomy. Several in vitro studies in different neuronal cells support the notion that an activation of RhoA results in increased cell death while an inhibition of RhoA has anti-apoptotic effects: Rho-inhibition with C3-enzyme attenuated thrombin-induced cell death in hippocampal neurons (Donovan et al., 1997), inhibited apoptotic membrane blebbing in PC12 cells (Mills et al., 1998), increased survival of organotypic Purkinje cells (Julien et al., 2008) and rescued cortical neurons from phenylalanine-induced apoptosis (Zhang et al., 2007), while overexpression of RhoA caused high levels of apoptosis in cortical neurons during early postnatal development (Sanno et al., 2010). Moreover, it was shown that RhoA is essential for glutamate-induced cell death of cerebellar granule neurons, being activated by elevated intracellular calcium levels and acting via p38α (Semenova et al., 2007). In Drosophila melanogaster, the RhoA-homolog Rho1 promoted apoptosis independently of ROCK through its effects on c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling (Neisch et al., 2010). On the other hand, a few studies reported negative effects of Rho-inhibition on neuronal survival: C3-enzyme induced apoptosis in different neuroglioma cell lines (Udagawa and McIntyre, 1996) and expression of dominant negative RhoA increased apoptosis of spinal cord motor neurons during embryonal development (Kobayashi et al., 2004). In disease models in vivo, there is, to the best of our knowledge, no evidence for the effects of specific RhoA-downregulation on neuronal survival. However, in line with our results, Rho-inhibition with C3-enzyme in the ONC model resulted in an increased RGC-number (Fischer et al., 2004).

Our present data identify the isoform RhoA to be involved in neuronal cell death after optic nerve axotomy in vivo. The amount of the pro-survival effect was similar to the effects previously observed for ROCK2-shRNA in the same model system (Koch et al., 2014), suggesting that ROCK2 is the main molecular mediator of the anti-apoptotic effects of RhoA. Due to the limitations of the shRNA-approach discussed above, it is, however, also possible that other known downstream targets of RhoA with anti-apoptotic effects, e.g., JNK or p38 α, are involved. This could strengthen the therapeutic value of RhoA-inhibition compared to ROCK-inhibition with regards to neuronal survival.

Taken together, we show here that knockdown of RhoA resulted in a modest increase of neurite outgrowth of RGC and PMN in vitro and of axonal regeneration after ONC in vivo while RGC survival after optic nerve axotomy was substantially increased. These findings thus characterize in more detail the specific functions of RhoA with importance to pathobiology of traumatic and degenerative CNS disorders and contribute to an improved understanding of the value of RhoA as a putative therapeutic target.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Elisabeth Barski for excellent technical support. Jan Christoph Koch and Paul Lingor were supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (LI 1308/3-1). Mathias Bähr and Paul Lingor were supported by the Cluster of Excellence and DFG Research Center Nanoscale Microscopy and Molecular Physiology of the Brain (CNMPB), Göttingen. We are indebted to the “Open-Access-Publikationsfonds der DFG” for contribution to the publication costs.

Glossary

Abbreviations

AAV

adeno-associated viral vector

ANOVA

analysis of variance

BSA

bovine serum albumin

CNS

central nervous system

CSPG

chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan

DAPI

4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

DIV

day in vitro

GAP43

growth associated protein 43

LIMK

LIM domain kinase

PMN

primary midbrain neurons

ONC

optic nerve crush

PBS

phosphate-buffered saline

PFA

paraformaldehyde

RGC

retinal ganglion cells

RhoA

Ras homologous member A

ROCK

Rho-associated protein kinase

RT-PCR

real-time polymerase chain reaction

siRNA

small interfering RNA

shRNA

small hairpin RNA

TU

transforming units.

Footnotes

References

  1. Arber S., Barbayannis F. A., Hanser H., Schneider C., Stanyon C. A., Bernard O., et al. (1998). Regulation of actin dynamics through phosphorylation of cofilin by LIM-kinase. Nature 393, 805–809 10.1038/31729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Audesirk G., Audesirk T., Ferguson C. (2001). Culturing rat hippocampal neurons. Curr. Protoc. Toxicol. Chapter 12, Unit12.13. 10.1002/0471140856.tx1203s04 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barres B. A., Silverstein B. E., Corey D. P., Chun L. L. (1988). Immunological, morphological and electrophysiological variation among retinal ganglion cells purified by panning. Neuron 1, 791–803 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90127-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. de Lima S., Koriyama Y., Kurimoto T., Oliveira J. T., Yin Y., Li Y., et al. (2012). Full-length axon regeneration in the adult mouse optic nerve and partial recovery of simple visual behaviors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 109, 9149–9154 10.1073/pnas.1119449109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donovan F. M., Pike C. J., Cotman C. W., Cunningham D. D. (1997). Thrombin induces apoptosis in cultured neurons and astrocytes via a pathway requiring tyrosine kinase and RhoA activities. J. Neurosci. 17, 5316–5326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dontchev V. D., Letourneau P. C. (2003). Growth cones integrate signaling from multiple guidance cues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 51, 435–444 10.1177/002215540305100405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Endo M., Ohashi K., Sasaki Y., Goshima Y., Niwa R., Uemura T., et al. (2003). Control of growth cone motility and morphology by LIM kinase and Slingshot via phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of cofilin. J. Neurosci. 23, 2527–2537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fan Y. M., Pang C. P., Harvey A. R., Cui Q. (2008). Marked effect of RhoA-specific shRNA-producing plasmids on neurite growth in PC12 cells. Neurosci. Lett. 440, 170–175 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.05.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fard M. A., Ebrahimi K. B., Miller N. R. (2013). RhoA activity and post-ischemic inflammation in an experimental model of adult rodent anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Brain Res. 1534, 76–86 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fischer D., Petkova V., Thanos S., Benowitz L. I. (2004). Switching mature retinal ganglion cells to a robust growth state in vivo: gene expression and synergy with RhoA inactivation. J. Neurosci. 24, 8726–8740 10.1523/jneurosci.2774-04.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldhagen B., Proia A. D., Epstein D. L., Rao P. V. (2012). Elevated levels of RhoA in the optic nerve head of human eyes with glaucoma. J. Glaucoma 21, 530–538 10.1097/ijg.0b013e318241b83c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gu H., Yu S. P., Gutekunst C. A., Gross R. E., Wei L. (2013). Inhibition of the Rho signaling pathway improves neurite outgrowth and neuronal differentiation of mouse neural stem cells. Int. J. Physiol. Pathophysiol. Pharmacol. 5, 11–20 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hengst U., Cox L. J., Macosko E. Z., Jaffrey S. R. (2006). Functional and selective RNA interference in developing axons and growth cones. J. Neurosci. 26, 5727–5732 10.1523/jneurosci.5229-05.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoffmann A., Hofmann F., Just I., Lehnardt S., Hanisch U. K., Bruck W., et al. (2008). Inhibition of Rho-dependent pathways by Clostridium botulinum C3 protein induces a proinflammatory profile in microglia. Glia 56, 1162–1175 10.1002/glia.20687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ishizaki T., Naito M., Fujisawa K., Maekawa M., Watanabe N., Saito Y., et al. (1997). p160ROCK, a Rho-associated coiled-coil forming protein kinase, works downstream of Rho and induces focal adhesions. FEBS Lett. 404, 118–124 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00107-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jalink K., van Corven E. J., Hengeveld T., Morii N., Narumiya S., Moolenaar W. H. (1994). Inhibition of lysophosphatidate- and thrombin-induced neurite retraction and neuronal cell rounding by ADP ribosylation of the small GTP-binding protein Rho. J. Cell Biol. 126, 801–810 10.1083/jcb.126.3.801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Julien S., Schnichels S., Teng H., Tassew N., Henke-Fahle S., Mueller B. K., et al. (2008). Purkinje cell survival in organotypic cultures: implication of Rho and its downstream effector ROCK. J. Neurosci. Res. 86, 531–536 10.1002/jnr.21511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Just I., Rohrbeck A., Huelsenbeck S. C., Hoeltje M. (2011). Therapeutic effects of Clostridium botulinum C3 exoenzyme. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 383, 247–252 10.1007/s00210-010-0589-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Katoh H., Aoki J., Ichikawa A., Negishi M. (1998). p160 RhoA-binding kinase ROKalpha induces neurite retraction. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2489–2492 10.1074/jbc.273.5.2489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kobayashi K., Takahashi M., Matsushita N., Miyazaki J., Koike M., Yaginuma H., et al. (2004). Survival of developing motor neurons mediated by Rho GTPase signaling pathway through Rho-kinase. J. Neurosci. 24, 3480–3488 10.1523/jneurosci.0295-04.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Koch J. C., Barski E., Lingor P., Bahr M., Michel U. (2011a). Plasmids containing NRSE/RE1 sites enhance neurite outgrowth of retinal ganglion cells via sequestration of REST independent of NRSE dsRNA expression. FEBS J. 278, 3472–3483 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08269.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Koch J. C., Knöferle J., Tönges L., Michel U., Bähr M., Lingor P. (2011b). Imaging of rat optic nerve axons in vivo. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1887–1896 10.1038/nprot.2011.403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Koch J. C., Solis G. P., Bodrikov V., Michel U., Haralampieva D., Shypitsyna A., et al. (2013). Upregulation of reggie-1/flotillin-2 promotes axon regeneration in the rat optic nerve in vivo and neurite growth in vitro. Neurobiol. Dis. 51, 168–176 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Koch J. C., Tönges L., Barski E., Michel U., Bähr M., Lingor P. (2014). ROCK2 is a major regulator of axonal degeneration, neuronal death and axonal regeneration in the CNS. Cell Death Dis. 5:e1225 10.1038/cddis.2014.191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lehmann M., Fournier A., Selles-Navarro I., Dergham P., Sebok A., Leclerc N., et al. (1999). Inactivation of Rho signaling pathway promotes CNS axon regeneration. J. Neurosci. 19, 7537–7547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lin X., Ogiya M., Takahara M., Yamaguchi W., Furuyama T., Tanaka H., et al. (2007). Sema4D-plexin-B1 implicated in regulation of dendritic spine density through RhoA/ROCK pathway. Neurosci. Lett. 428, 1–6 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.09.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lingor P., Unsicker K., Krieglstein K. (1999). Midbrain dopaminergic neurons are protected from radical induced damage by GDF-5 application. Short communication. J. Neural Transm. 106, 139–144 10.1007/s007020050146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luo L. (2000). Rho GTPases in neuronal morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 173–180 10.1038/35044547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mackay D. J., Nobes C. D., Hall A. (1995). The Rho’s progress: a potential role during neuritogenesis for the Rho family of GTPases. Trends Neurosci. 18, 496–501 10.1016/0166-2236(95)92773-j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Malik I., Garrido M., Bahr M., Kugler S., Michel U. (2006). Comparison of test systems for RNAinterference. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 341, 245–253 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.12.173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Meijering E., Jacob M., Sarria J. C., Steiner P., Hirling H., Unser M. (2004). Design and validation of a tool for neurite tracing and analysis in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytometry A 58, 167–176 10.1002/cyto.a.20022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Michel U., Malik I., Ebert S., Bahr M., Kugler S. (2005). Long-term in vivo and in vitro AAV-2-mediated RNA interference in rat retinal ganglion cells and cultured primary neurons. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 326, 307–312 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mills J. C., Stone N. L., Erhardt J., Pittman R. N. (1998). Apoptotic membrane blebbing is regulated by myosin light chain phosphorylation. J. Cell Biol. 140, 627–636 10.1083/jcb.140.3.627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Monnier P. P., Sierra A., Schwab J. M., Henke-Fahle S., Mueller B. K. (2003). The Rho/ROCK pathway mediates neurite growth-inhibitory activity associated with the chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans of the CNS glial scar. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 22, 319–330 10.1016/s1044-7431(02)00035-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Moreau-Fauvarque C., Kumanogoh A., Camand E., Jaillard C., Barbin G., Boquet I., et al. (2003). The transmembrane semaphorin Sema4D/CD100, an inhibitor of axonal growth, is expressed on oligodendrocytes and upregulated after CNS lesion. J. Neurosci. 23, 9229–9239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mueller B. K., Mack H., Teusch N. (2005). Rho kinase, a promising drug target for neurological disorders. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 387–398 10.1038/nrd1719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Neisch A. L., Speck O., Stronach B., Fehon R. G. (2010). Rho1 regulates apoptosis via activation of the JNK signaling pathway at the plasma membrane. J. Cell Biol. 189, 311–323 10.1083/jcb.200912010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Niederöst B. P., Zimmermann D. R., Schwab M. E., Bandtlow C. E. (1999). Bovine CNS myelin contains neurite growth-inhibitory activity associated with chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans. J. Neurosci. 19, 8979–8989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Otsuka S., Adamson C., Sankar V., Gibbs K. M., Kane-Goldsmith N., Ayer J., et al. (2011). Delayed intrathecal delivery of RhoA siRNA to the contused spinal cord inhibits allodynia, preserves white matter and increases serotonergic fiber growth. J. Neurotrauma 28, 1063–1076 10.1089/neu.2010.1568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rubin E. J., Gill D. M., Boquet P., Popoff M. R. (1988). Functional modification of a 21-kilodalton G protein when ADP-ribosylated by exoenzyme C3 of Clostridium botulinum. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 418–426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sanno H., Shen X., Kuru N., Bormuth I., Bobsin K., Gardner H. A., et al. (2010). Control of postnatal apoptosis in the neocortex by RhoA-subfamily GTPases determines neuronal density. J. Neurosci. 30, 4221–4231 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3318-09.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schaden H., Stuermer C. A., Bahr M. (1994). GAP-43 immunoreactivity and axon regeneration in retinal ganglion cells of the rat. J. Neurobiol. 25, 1570–1578 10.1002/neu.480251209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Semenova M. M., Maki-Hokkonen A. M., Cao J., Komarovski V., Forsberg K. M., Koistinaho M., et al. (2007). Rho mediates calcium-dependent activation of p38alpha and subsequent excitotoxic cell death. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 436–443 10.1038/nn1869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shamah S. M., Lin M. Z., Goldberg J. L., Estrach S., Sahin M., Hu L., et al. (2001). EphA receptors regulate growth cone dynamics through the novel guanine nucleotide exchange factor ephexin. Cell 105, 233–244 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00314-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tigyi G., Fischer D. J., Sebok A., Marshall F., Dyer D. L., Miledi R. (1996). Lysophosphatidic acid-induced neurite retraction in PC12 cells: neurite-protective effects of cyclic AMP signaling. J. Neurochem. 66, 549–558 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.66020549.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tönges L., Frank T., Tatenhorst L., Saal K. A., Koch J. C., Szegö E. M., et al. (2012). Inhibition of rho kinase enhances survival of dopaminergic neurons and attenuates axonal loss in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain 135, 3355–3370 10.1093/brain/aws254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tönges L., Koch J. C., Bähr M., Lingor P. (2011a). ROCKing regeneration: Rho kinase inhibition as molecular target for neurorestoration. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 4:39 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tönges L., Planchamp V., Koch J. C., Herdegen T., Bähr M., Lingor P. (2011b). JNK isoforms differentially regulate neurite growth and regeneration in dopaminergic neurons in vitro. J. Mol. Neurosci. 45, 284–293 10.1007/s12031-011-9519-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Udagawa T., McIntyre B. W. (1996). ADP-ribosylation of the G protein Rho inhibits integrin regulation of tumor cell growth. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12542–12548 10.1074/jbc.271.21.12542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wahl S., Barth H., Ciossek T., Aktories K., Mueller B. K. (2000). Ephrin-A5 induces collapse of growth cones by activating Rho and Rho kinase. J. Cell Biol. 149, 263–270 10.1083/jcb.149.2.263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang Y. H., Wang Y., Wang D. W., Wu N., Liu D. N., Yin Z. Q. (2007). Distribution and expression of RhoA in rat retina after optic nerve injury. Ophthalmic Res. 39, 174–178 10.1159/000103237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Watanabe N., Madaule P., Reid T., Ishizaki T., Watanabe G., Kakizuka A., et al. (1997). p140mDia, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila diaphanous, is a target protein for Rho small GTPase and is a ligand for profilin. EMBO J. 16, 3044–3056 10.1093/emboj/16.11.3044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang Y., Gu X., Yuan X. (2007). Phenylalanine activates the mitochondria-mediated apoptosis through the RhoA/Rho-associated kinase pathway in cortical neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25, 1341–1348 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05404.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES