Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Immunol Res. 2014 May 22;2(9):839–845. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0038

Antigen-specific culture of memory-like CD8 T cells for adoptive immunotherapy

Adam J Litterman 1,2,3, David M Zellmer 1,2,3, Rebecca S LaRue 1,4,5, Stephen C Jameson 6,7, David A Largaespada 1,2,3,4,5
PMCID: PMC4156517  NIHMSID: NIHMS599118  PMID: 24852944

Abstract

Cytotoxic T cells typically are expanded ex vivo in culture with IL-2 for adoptive immunotherapy. This culture period leads to a differentiated phenotype and acquisition of effector function, as well as a loss of in vivo proliferative capability and antitumor efficacy. Here, we report antigen-specific and polyclonal expansion of cytotoxic T cells in a cocktail of cytokines and small molecules that leads to a memory-like phenotype in mouse and human cells even during extended culture, leading to enhanced in vivo expansion and tumor control in mice.

Introduction

Adoptive immunotherapy is a promising treatment for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors that consists of infusion of ex vivo manipulated immune cells with antitumor specificity (1, 2). This specificity is either an inherent property of cultured tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (1, 3) or is introduced by antigen-specific expansion (4) or transduction with an antigen receptor gene (5, 6), but in either case the T cells are typically stimulated with the potent T-cell mitogen and growth factor IL-2. Repeated rounds of stimulation of CD8+ T-lymphocytes in the presence of IL-2 lead to acquisition of effector function and enhanced in vitro killing of target cells but also to terminal differentiation and loss of proliferative capacity associated with inferior tumor control (7, 8). Numerous signaling pathways and transcriptional controllers have been identified as enhancing self-renewal capability and memory formation of CD8 T cells, including signaling by common γ-chain cytokines other than IL-2 (particularly IL-7 and IL-21) (9-11), the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (12), and inhibition of the cell growth and metabolism pathways (13-15).

Materials and Methods

T cell culture

All immune cells were cultured in a T-cell medium consisting of RPMI 1640 with 25 mM HEPES, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 1:100 with penicillin streptomycin, non-essential amino acids and sodium pyruvate and 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol. Mouse CD8 T cells were isolated by pressing mouse spleen and lymph node cells through a 40 micron nylon mesh filter in RPMI followed by negative selection with a magnetic isolation kit for CD8α T cells (Miltenyi). For OT-I experiments mouse CD8 T cells were separately isolated from C57BL/6-Tg(TcraTcrb)1100Mjb/J (hereafter OT-I/Thy1.2) mice (16) and B6.PL-Thy1a/CyJ (hereafter Thy1.1) mice and mixed at a ratio of 1:100. HLA-typed PBMCs from CMV-seronegative donors were obtained from Precision Bioservices. Human CD8 T cells were isolated by separation from freshly thawed PBMCs by negative selection with a magnetic isolation kit for CD8α T cells (Miltenyi). Antigen-specific cells were enriched as previously described (17) from freshly isolated lymph node and spleen cells (mouse) or overnight incubated PBMCs (human) after staining with dextramers according to manufacturer's instructions (Immudex). T cells were incubated mixed with peptide pulsed dendritic cells at a ratio of 2:1 or CD3/CD28 beads (Invitrogen) at a ratio of 1:1 and plated at a density of 10,000-20,000 T cells per well of round bottom 96-well plates in a volume of 150-200 μL per well. Fresh media containing the same concentration of cytokines and drugs was added to each well at half the volume initially plated after 3-4 days. Cells were spun over a histopaque-1077 (Sigma-Aldrich) gradient to remove dead cells, counted and re-plated with fresh dendritic cells or CD3/CD28 beads once a week.

Generation of Dendritic Cells

Bone-marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDC) were cultured as previously described (18). C57BL/6 femora, tibiae, humeri and pelves were rinsed with RPMI through a 40 micron nylon mesh, washed, red blood cell lysed with ACK buffer, washed again and plated in T-cell media supplemented with murine GM-CSF for 7-9 days. BMDCs were matured 24 hours before use by addition of 2 μg of polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid stabilized with poly-L-lysine(polyICLC, provided by Oncovir) per mL of culture medium. Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDC) (4) were generated by isolating monocytes from freshly thawed PBMCs with CD14-positive selection microbeads (Miltenyi) and culturing these monocytes for 8-10 days in T-cell medium supplemented with human GM-CSF and human IL-4. moDCs were matured 24 hours before use by addition of 2 μg of polyICLC per mL of culture medium. For both mouse BMDCs and human moDCs, dendritic cells were coated with cognate-antigen peptide by adding peptide to matured dendritic cells at a concentration of 20 μg/mL and incubating at 37° C for 2 hours. Dendritic cells were washed 4 times in RPMI to remove excess peptide from media before being mixed with T cells.

Cytokines and small molecules

All cytokines except for human IL-2 were from Peprotech. Mouse cells were plated in T-cell medium containing 1 ng/mL recombinant murine IL-2, or 10 ng/mL murine IL-7 and 20 ng/mL murine IL-21. Human cells were plated in T-cell medium containing 80 IU/mL recombinant human IL-2 (R&D Systems), or 10 ng/mL human IL-7 and 20 ng/mL human IL-21. Human and mouse cells were incubated with 2-deoxyglucose (Sigma) at a concentration of 400 μM, and TWS119 (Selleck Chemical) at a concentration of 4 μM. For generation of bone-marrow derived dendritic cells, mouse bone marrow cells were plated in 20 ng/mL murine GM-CSF. For generation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells, human monocytes were plated in 100 ng/mL human GM-CSF and 50 ng/mL human IL-4.

Animals, tumor model, adoptive transfers, peptides and flow cytometry

Mouse experiments were performed in accordance with University of Minnesota Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. C57BL/6J mice, OT-I and Thy1.1 mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and used at 6-10 weeks of age.

Thy1.1 mice were inoculated with 30,000 cells of the SIINFEKL-expressing syngeneic C57BL/6 glioma line Quad-KM3M14 in the ventral striatum as previously described (19). Tumor take and growth were assessed with bioluminescent imaging using a Xenogen IVIS 100 imager. Mice were treated with 75mg/kg temozolomide (Toronto Research Chemicals) suspended in sterile PBS by oral gavage daily for five days starting five days after the tumor was inoculated. One day after the last dose of temozolomide mice were given an adoptive transfer of 750,000 OT-I T cells as an intravenous injection into the retro-orbital venous sinus. Mice were vaccinated with 50 μg of Ova peptide (Anaspec) and 10 mg of polyICLC via a subcutaneous injection in the thigh near the inguinal lymph node 2 and 5 days after the adoptive transfer. Transferred T-cell levels were measured by flow cytometry using 50 μL of blood extracted from the retro-orbital venous sinus. All antibodies used were from eBioscience. Ova (SIINFEKL) and CMV pp65 (NLVPMVATV) peptides were from Anaspec. CDK4 R24C (ACDPHSGHFV) peptide was from Genscript. Dextramers were from Immudex. Flow cytometry was performed using BD FacsCanto, LSRII and LSR Fortessa flow cytometers. Cell sorting for RNAseq was performed using a BD FacsAria II. Flow cytometry data was analyzed with Cytobank software.

RNA sequencing and gene expression data analysis

OT-I CD8 T cells were sorted as indicated in the text. Cells were pelleted and total RNA was extracted using the Arcturus PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit (Life Technologies). Each sample was divided into three technical replicates and sequenced to a depth of ∼40 million paired-end 50 base-pair reads using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer (Illumina). Fastq files generated from RNA sequencing were mapped to the mm10 mouse genome using TopHat 2.0 (20). Differential expression was calculated using Cuffdiff 2.1.1 (21).

Expression data for 28 mouse samples from the Immunological Genome Project Consortium (http://www.immgen.org/; ref.22) was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (GEO accession no series GSE15907: specific files GSM605891-6, GSM605898-605911, GSM920634-920641) for comparison to the gene expression data based in this study. These files were normalized according to methods described in (23). Expression data described in this study was compared to gene expression data described in the gene list and data provided in Supplementary Table 1 from Best et al., 2013 (44 mouse samples). In the microarray data described above, multiple probes for a gene were averaged. Data sets from each gene expression technique (RNA sequencing and Microarray) were separately normalized using the average value of each gene. All data sets were uploaded and analyzed using Genedata Analyst v7.6. Hierarchical clustering was performed with Cluster v3.0 (24) using the Euclidean distance metric and average linkage. Tree view v1.1.3 (25) was used to create heat maps. To explore functional networks, selected gene expression lists with both fold-change of >2 and direction of change were submitted to Ingenuity Pathway Transcriptional Regulators Analysis (www.ingenuity.com).

The GEO accession number for this study is: GSE54877.

Results and Discussions

The coupling of proliferation and differentiation of CD8 T cells is particularly problematic for antigen-specific cultures, which use multiple stimulations with autologous or artificial antigen-presenting cells pulsed with specific peptides to massively expand antigen-specific cells from very low precursor frequencies in the peripheral blood (4, 26). This approach is appealing because it does not require tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes or tumor-restricted expression of targets for chimeric antigen receptors, and can be adapted to use patient-specific neoantigens identified prospectively by deep sequencing (1, 27-29). As a model system to investigate modifications to antigen-specific cell-culture conditions that would yield less differentiated, memory-like CD8 T cells from patient PBMCs, we mixed congenically marked OT-I CD8 T cells with polyclonal C57BL/6 CD8 T cells at a ratio of ∼1:100, approximating a frequency achievable from the naïve repertoire via peptide-MHC multimer enrichment (17). We screened individual modifications to the culture protocol by mixing SIINFEKL-pulsed bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDC) with the mixed CD8 T cells in media containing either alternate cytokines besides IL-2, or IL-2 and added drugs and assaying the percentage of memory phenotype CD44+CD62L+ OT-I T cells after two weeks in culture. We identified numerous modified culture conditions that yielded small sub-populations CD62L+ cells (Supplementary Fig. 1), and when these modifications were combined in a cocktail of memory-inducing factors (IL-21 and IL-7 instead of IL-2, plus 2-deoxyglucose and the GSK3β inhibitor TWS119) we noted an additive effect, with sustained antigen-specific proliferation of OT-I cells (Fig. 1a) where approximately half of the cells remained CD62L+ (Fig. 1b). While the accumulation of Celltrace-diluted cells is slower for cells cultured in this cocktail of factors (Fig. 1a), this slower proliferation is balanced by enhanced survival of cells in this culture, as we observed a greater viability of cells cultured in the cocktail versus cells grown in IL-2 (Supplementary Fig. 2). We enumerated the number of antigen-specific cells grown by this method and observed roughly equivalent numbers of viable antigen-specific cells at various time points in cultures grown with this cocktail of factors as in cultures of cells grown in IL-2 (Supplementary Fig. 3), indicating that this method could be used with similar amounts of starting material as in conventional expansion protocols.

Figure 1. CD8 T cells cultured in a cocktail of cytokines and small molecules resemble memory cells.

Figure 1

(a) Flow cytometric analysis of congenically marked OT-I CD8 T cells mixed ∼1:100 with bulk CD8 T cells and expanded with SIINFEKL-pulsed bone-marrow derived dendritic cells in IL-2 or cocktail of small molecules and cytokines (see methods). (b) Representative plots of expression of the phenotypic markers CD62L and CD44 on Thy1.2+ OT-I CD8 T cells. Plots in (a,b) representative of more than five independent experiments. (c) Plots of pre- and post-sort Thy1.2+ OT-I CD8 T cells grown as in (a) and purified by FACS for RNAseq analysis. (d) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of RNAseq of populations sorted as in (c) showing all genes with a >2 fold difference between groups 1 and 3. Inset: principal component analysis of genes with >2-fold difference between any two groups for populations depicted in (c), and heatmap of selected biologically relevant genes in populations depicted in (c) and at selected time points of the OT-I response to L. monocytogenes Ova (from 21).

To further characterize these cells, we performed RNAseq analysis on sorted OT-I cells derived from naïve (CD44loCD62L+) OT-I mouse spleens, cocktail-cultured cells and differentiated (CD44hiCD62L-) IL-2 cultured cells. Since the extent of differentiation of mouse CD8 T cells has been identified as a determinant of in vivo expansion and antitumor efficacy we sorted the heterogeneous cocktail-cultured cells into CD44hiCD62L-, CD44hiCD62L+ and CD44loCD62L+ before extracting RNA (Fig. 1c). Principal component analysis and unsupervised non-hierarchical clustering revealed that all three populations cultured in the memory cocktail exhibited gene transcription profiles that clustered close to one another, were highly distinct from cells grown in IL-2 and clustered closer to naïve cells than IL-2-grown cells (Fig. 1d). In order to compare our in vitro derived cells with bona fide memory cells differentiated in response to an infection, we compared the transcriptome of our cultured OT-I cells to OT-I CD8 T cells at various time points of an in vivo immune response to L. monocytogenes Ova described by the Immunological Genome Consortium (23). This analysis revealed that cells grown in IL-2 in vitro and early effector OT-I cells in vivo (1-6 days after infection) showed similar transcriptional profiles, highly expressing genes involved in effector function (Gzma, Ifng, Il2ra, Sema7a). Cocktail-grown cells and late memory cells (100 days after infection) also had transcriptional profiles that were similar to one another, showing levels of expression of effector genes that were intermediate between naïve cells and IL-2-grown cells, and higher levels of genes involved in self-renewal and survival including Bcl2 and Tcf7 than IL-2-grown cells or early effector cells. (Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 4) Upstream regulator analysis (Supplementary Table 1) identified numerous transcriptional regulators activated in cocktail-grown cells versus IL-2-grown cells. These included factors previously described as master regulators of CD8 T-cell memory including FOXO1 (30) and BCL6 (31), as well as novel transcription factors that have not been described as having a role in CD8 T-cell memory. Tentatively identified novel factors of biological interest are related to pathways of resistance to aging, stress response and metabolism such as SIRT1 and FOXM1 (32,33) as well as factors that have proven critical to other aspects of immune function, such as FOXM1 and MYB in the regulation of proliferation in germinal center B cells (34).

In order to assay the cocktail-cultured OT-I cells for efficacy in treating a solid tumor, we transferred equal numbers of IL-2- or cocktail-cultured OT-I cells intravenously into mice bearing established Quad-KM3M14 gliomas (that express the ovalbumin epitope SIINFEKL) after treatment with the conditioning chemotherapy temozolomide (19). Upon in vivo restimulation with a vaccination consisting of the ovalbumin epitope SIINFEKL peptide and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilized with poly-L-lysine (poly ICLC) (Fig. 2a), IL-2-cultured cells rapidly expanded and then quickly contracted, whereas the cocktail-cultured cells expanded to a greater extent and maintained a significantly higher percentage of CD8 T cells in the blood for several weeks after vaccination (Fig. 2b). Even when normalized to the percentage of CD8 T cells present in blood 2 days after transfer to account for different rates of initial engraftment, the in vivo fold-expansion and persistence of the cocktail treated cells were greater (Fig. 2c). This greater expansion and persistence was associated with improved tumor control and enhanced overall survival of glioma-bearing mice that received cocktail-grown cells versus mice that received IL-2-grown cells or control mice that received no transferred cells (Fig. 2d,e).

Figure 2. Memory-like antigen-specific cultured CD8 T cells have greater antitumor efficacy than cells cultured in IL-2.

Figure 2

(a) Schematic illustration of tumor treatment experiment. Mice were implanted with 30,000 Ova-expressing Quad-KM3M14 syngeneic glioma cells and treated with conditioning temozolomide. 750,000 OT-I cells grown as in (Figure 1a) were adoptively transferred and mice were boosted with two subcutaneous vaccinations with SIINFEKL peptide and polyICLC. (b) Thy1.2+ OT-I CD8 T cells as a percentage of total CD8 T cells in blood. **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001, IL-2-cultured cells versus cocktail- cultured cells (Student's two-tailed t test). (c) Percentage of Thy1.2+ OT-I CD8 T cells of total CD8 T cells in blood, expressed as fold-increase over the percentage of cells 2 days after transfer. **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001, IL-2-cultured cells versus cocktail-cultured cells (Student's two-tailed t test). (d) Bioluminescent tumor signal of mice adoptively transferred with no cells, IL-2-cultured cells, or cocktail-cultured cells. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001, for indicated comparisons. (e) Survival of mice in (d). *p<0.05; ***, p<0.001, for indicated comparisons (log-rank test). Data depicted are one representative experiment of two separate experiments with similar outcomes.

We next sought to test if this approach would be feasible using antigen-specific CD8 T cells enriched from the polyclonal repertoire. We stained C57BL/6 splenocytes and lymph node cells with a Kb-Ova-specific dextramer and performed magnetic enrichment with anti-PE microbeads. The bound fraction eluted after performing this enrichment contained naïve antigen-specific cells at frequencies comparable to our OT-I experiments, which could be expanded when cultured with SIINFEKL pulsed BMDC in either IL-2- or cocktail-containing media. (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Similar to the OT-I system, IL-2-cultured cells upon expansion were almost uniformly negative for expression of CD62L, whereas cocktail-cultured cells were heterogeneous with a large fraction remaining positive for CD62L after antigen-specific expansion (Supplementary Fig. 5b). To test the applicability of this cocktail to human cells, we performed magnetic enrichment of antigen-specific CD8 cells from naïve human PBMCs by using HLA-A*0201 dextramers specific for both viral (35) (Fig. 3a) and tumor neoantigen (36) epitopes (Supplementary Fig. 6), and cultured those cells with antigen-pulsed autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDC). In both culture conditions, antigen-specific CD8 T cells preferentially expanded upon culture with antigen-pulsed moDCs (Fig. 3a). Antigen-specific CD8 T cells cultured in the cocktail of memory-inducing factors expressed high levels of cell-surface molecules that were differentially expressed between IL-2- and cocktail-treated mouse cells including CD95 (Fas receptor) and CCR7 (Supplementary Table 2), and which serve as markers of a memory phenotype and enhanced in vivo persistence upon adoptive transfer in primates (37) (Fig. 3b). To test the applicability of the cocktail for applications requiring polyclonal expansion (e.g. before chimeric antigen receptor transduction) we used CD3/CD28 beads to expand polyclonal human CD8 T cells. We observed a similar degree of expansion in both groups as assessed by dilution of Celltrace dye, and found that the cocktail-grown cells expressed memory marker cell surface proteins (Fig. 3c). The phenotype of these cells seems to correspond to a conventional TCM phenotype and does not seem to be enriched for TSCM as has been reported (38), as the CD8+ cells expanded with polyclonal stimulation were essentially all CD45RO+ within three days of stimulation (Supplementary Fig. 7).

Figure 3. Antigen-specific and polyclonal culture of memory-like CD8 T cells from human PBMCs.

Figure 3

(a) Flow cytometric analysis of CD8 T cells cultured from CMV-seronegative HLA-A*0201+ PBMCs after pulldown with CMV-specific HLA-A*0201-pp65 dextramer. Cells were cultured in IL-2 or cocktail of memory-associated cytokines and small molecules. Plots depict dextramer-stained cells at pulldown and after 1, 2 or 3 weeks in culture with autologous antigen-pulsed monocyte-derived dendritic cells. (b) Representative plots of expression of the phenotypic markers of memory CCR7 and CD95 (Fas) on HLA-A*0201-pp65 dextramer positive gated cells. Plots in (a,b) representative of experiments performed with cells from two donors and two separate antigens. (c) Flow cytometric analysis of MACS-isolated CD8 T cells from human PBMCs expanded with CD3/CD28 antibody-coated beads in IL-2- or cocktail-containing media. Cells were labeled with Celltrace violet and divided cells were gated as shown for analysis of phenotypic markers CCR7 and CD95. Plots are representative of five independent experiments with PBMCs from three donors.

We have demonstrated that naïve CD8 T cells cultured with antigenic stimulation (either in the form of a specific peptide-MHC complexes or via anti-CD3) in the presence of a cocktail of memory-formation associated small molecules and cytokines adopt a differential gene expression program relative to cells grown in IL-2. In mice, these cells have a greater proliferative potential and persistence in vivo and therefore have greater antitumor activity. Coupling this method with a peptide-MHC multimer pulldown allows the rapid (2-3 weeks) culturing of antigen-specific T-cell pools with a less differentiated phenotype than cells grown in IL-2. While these cells retain some naïve-like characteristics (for instance, greater in vivo expansion upon adoptive transfer than differentiated effector cells) the predominant phenotypic and transcriptional characteristics of these cells demonstrate activation and expansion by antigen, and resemble antigen-specific memory cells expanded after the resolution of a primary infection. The generation of such antigen-specific memory-like CD8 T cells could prove advantageous for cancer immunotherapy, particularly if coupled with prospective bioinformatics-based identification of tumor-specific mutation-derived neoantigens. This combination of factors may also be useful for expanding minimally differentiated T cells prior to transduction with antigen receptor-expressing vectors, or as a jumping off point for the further optimization of T-cell expansion protocols to limit differentiation. Finally, by analyzing the genetic program instantiated by these less differentiated cells, we have outlined some of the transcriptional controllers that could be useful targets of future genetic engineering approaches that would seek to enforce maintenance of proliferative capacity in T cells in extended culture prior to adoptive immunotherapy.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3

Acknowledgments

We thank the University of Minnesota Genomics Center for their assistance with sequencing. We also thank the Minnesota Supercomputing Institute for technical support of this work. We would also like to thank A. Temiz for assistance with bioinformatics and D. Masopust and C.A. Pennell for helpful discussion and suggestions. This work is dedicated to the memory of John R. Ohlfest.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest and financial disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial interests to disclose.

References

  • 1.Restifo NP, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA. Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:269–81. doi: 10.1038/nri3191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosenberg SA. Cell transfer immunotherapy for metastatic solid cancer--what clinicians need to know. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:577–85. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Kammula US, Hughes MS, Phan GQ, et al. Durable complete responses in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma using T-cell transfer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:4550–7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oelke M, Maus MV, Didiano D, June CH, Mackensen A, Schneck JP. Ex vivo induction and expansion of antigen-specific cytotoxic T cells by HLA-Ig-coated artificial antigen-presenting cells. Nat Med. 2003;9:619–24. doi: 10.1038/nm869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Porter DL, Levine BL, Kalos M, Bagg A, June CH. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:725–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Robbins PF, Morgan RA, Feldman SA, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Dudley ME, et al. Tumor regression in patients with metastatic synovial cell sarcoma and melanoma using genetically engineered lymphocytes reactive with NY-ESO-1. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:917–24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gattinoni L, Klebanoff CA, Palmer DC, Wrzesinski C, Kerstann K, Yu Z, et al. Acquisition of full effector function in vitro paradoxically impairs the in vivo antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1616–26. doi: 10.1172/JCI24480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gattinoni L, Klebanoff CA, Restifo NP. Paths to stemness: building the ultimate antitumour T cell. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:671–84. doi: 10.1038/nrc3322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang S, Ji Y, Gattinoni L, Zhang L, Yu Z, Restifo NP, et al. Modulating the differentiation status of ex vivo-cultured anti-tumor T cells using cytokine cocktails. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;4:4. doi: 10.1007/s00262-012-1378-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cui W, Liu Y, Weinstein JS, Craft J, Kaech SM. An interleukin-21-interleukin-10-STAT3 pathway is critical for functional maturation of memory CD8+ T cells. Immunity. 2011;35:792–805. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schluns KS, Kieper WC, Jameson SC, Lefrancois L. Interleukin-7 mediates the homeostasis of naive and memory CD8 T cells in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2000;1:426–32. doi: 10.1038/80868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gattinoni L, Zhong XS, Palmer DC, Ji Y, Hinrichs CS, Yu Z, et al. Wnt signaling arrests effector T cell differentiation and generates CD8+ memory stem cells. Nat Med. 2009;15:808–13. doi: 10.1038/nm.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Araki K, Turner AP, Shaffer VO, Gangappa S, Keller SA, Bachmann MF, et al. mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature. 2009;460:108–12. doi: 10.1038/nature08155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sukumar M, Liu J, Ji Y, Subramanian M, Crompton JG, Yu Z, et al. Inhibiting glycolytic metabolism enhances CD8+ T cell memory and antitumor function. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:4479–88. doi: 10.1172/JCI69589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pearce EL, Walsh MC, Cejas PJ, Harms GM, Shen H, Wang LS, et al. Enhancing CD8 T-cell memory by modulating fatty acid metabolism. Nature. 2009;460:103–7. doi: 10.1038/nature08097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hogquist KA, Jameson SC, Heath WR, Howard JL, Bevan MJ, Carbone FR. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell. 1994;76:17–27. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90169-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Legoux FP, Moon JJ. Peptide:MHC tetramer-based enrichment of epitope-specific T cells. J Vis Exp. 2012;(68) doi: 10.3791/4420. pii 4420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Muccioli M, Pate M, Omosebi O, Benencia F. Generation and labeling of murine bone marrow-derived dendritic cells with Qdot nanocrystals for tracking studies. J Vis Exp. 2011;(52) doi: 10.3791/2785. pii 2785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Litterman AJ, Zellmer DM, Grinnen KL, Hunt MA, Dudek AZ, Salazar AM, Ohlfest JR. Profound Impairment of Adaptive Immune Responses by Alkylating Chemotherapy. J Immunol. 2013;190:6259–68. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1105–11. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:511–5. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.http://www.immgen.org
  • 23.Best JA, Blair DA, Knell J, Yang E, Mayya V, Doedens A, et al. Transcriptional insights into the CD8(+) T cell response to infection and memory T cell formation. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:404–12. doi: 10.1038/ni.2536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:14863–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Heard J, Kaufmann W, Guan X. A novel method for large tree visualization. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:557–8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Weber G, Caruana I, Rouce RH, Barrett AJ, Gerdemann U, Leen AM, et al. Generation of tumor antigen-specific T cell lines from pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia--implications for immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:5079–91. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hacohen N, Fritsch EF, Carter TA, Lander ES, Wu CJ. Getting Personal with Neoantigen-Based Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1:11–5. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kvistborg P, van Buuren MM, Schumacher TN. Human cancer regression antigens. Curr Opin Immunol. 2013;25:284–90. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Heemskerk B, Kvistborg P, Schumacher TN. The cancer antigenome. EMBO J. 2013;32:194–203. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hess Michelini R, Doedens AL, Goldrath AW, Hedrick SM. Differentiation of CD8 memory T cells depends on Foxo1. J Exp Med. 2013;210:1189–200. doi: 10.1084/jem.20130392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ichii H, Sakamoto A, Hatano M, Okada S, Toyama H, Taki S, Arima M, Kuroda Y, Tokuhisa T. Role for Bcl-6 in the generation and maintenance of memory CD8+ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:558–63. doi: 10.1038/ni802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brunet A, Sweeney LB, Sturgill JF, Chua KF, Greer PL, Lin Y, et al. Stress-dependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science. 2004;303:2011–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1094637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Laoukili J, Stahl M, Medema RH. FoxM1: at the crossroads of ageing and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1775:92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lefebvre C, Rajbhandari P, Alvarez MJ, Bandaru P, Lim WK, Sato M, et al. A human B-cell interactome identifies MYB and FOXM1 as master regulators of proliferation in germinal centers. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:377. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Diamond DJ, York J, Sun JY, Wright CL, Forman SJ. Development of a candidate HLA A*0201 restricted peptide-based vaccine against human cytomegalovirus infection. Blood. 1997;90:1751–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wolfel T, Hauer M, Schneider J, Serrano M, Wolfel C, Klehmann-Hieb E, De Plaen E, Hankeln T, Meyer zum Buschenfelde KH, Beach D. A p16INK4a-insensitive CDK4 mutant targeted by cytolytic T lymphocytes in a human melanoma. Science. 1995;269:1281–4. doi: 10.1126/science.7652577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Berger C, Jensen MC, Lansdorp PM, Gough M, Elliott C, Riddell SR. Adoptive transfer of effector CD8+ T cells derived from central memory cells establishes persistent T cell memory in primates. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:294–305. doi: 10.1172/JCI32103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gattinoni L, Lugli E, Ji Y, Pos Z, Paulos CM, Quigley MF, et al. A human memory T cell subset with stem cell-like properties. Nature Med. 2011;17:1290–7. doi: 10.1038/nm.2446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3

RESOURCES