Abstract
Principles to guide design of an effective vaccine against HIV are greatly needed, particularly to protect women in the pandemic’s epicentre in Africa. We have been seeking these principles by identifying correlates of the robust protection associated with SIVmac239Δnef vaccination in the SIV-rhesus macaque animal model of HIV-1 transmission to women. We have identified one correlate of SIVmac239Δnef protection against vaginal challenge as a resident mucosal system for SIV-gp41 trimer antibody production and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-mediated concentration of these antibodies on the path of virus entry to inhibit establishment of infected founder populations at the portal of entry. Here we identify as a second protection correlate, blocking CD4+ T cell recruitment to inhibit local expansion of infected founder populations. Virus-specific immune complex interactions with the inhibitory FcγRIIb receptor in the epithelium lining the cervix initiate expression of genes that block recruitment of target cells to fuel local expansion. Immune complex-FcγRIIb receptor interactions at mucosal frontlines to dampen the innate immune response to vaginal challenge could be a potentially general mechanism for the mucosal immune system to sense and modulate the response to a previously encountered pathogen. Designing vaccines to provide protection without eliciting these transmission-promoting innate responses could contribute to developing an effective HIV-1 vaccine.
Introduction
While there have been advances in preventing HIV-1 infection (1-3), an effective vaccine is urgently needed, particularly to prevent infection in the high-risk populations of women in sub-Saharan Africa that continue to drive the pandemic’s progress. To that end, we have been seeking design principles to guide development of such a vaccine by identifying correlates of the robust protection afforded by live-attenuated SIV vaccines in the SIV-rhesus macaque model of HIV-1 transmission to women (4-6). In the accompanying paper, we identified one such correlate of protection conferred by SIVmac239Δnef vaccination in an organized system of antibody production and concentration at mucosal frontlines on the path of virus entry. We found that vaccination induces production by plasma cells in the submucosa and ectopic follicles of IgG antibodies reactive with a trimeric form of the viral envelope gp41 glycoprotein (gp41t). These antibodies are concentrated by neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-mediated mechanisms as the spatial and temporal correlate of preventing or restricting the establishment of founder populations of infected cells as the antecedents for a robust, systemic infection.
In this paper, we show that a second Fc receptor, the inhibitory Fc receptor for IgG, FcγRIIb, also plays an important role in the protection conferred by SIVmac239Δnef vaccination. Virus-specific immune complexes (ICs), formed by reaction of challenge virus with vaccine-induced antibodies, interact with the inhibitory FcγRIIb receptor in the columnar epithelium lining the cervix. This interaction elicits expression of genes that down-regulate the innate immune and inflammatory response to the viral inoculum, which in turn disrupts the outside in signaling that in naïve animals recruits CD4+ T cells to the portal of entry where they then fuel local expansion of any foci of infected cells initially established there. Thus, a second correlate of SIVmac239Δnef IgG antibody protection is reducing target cell availability through engagement of FcγRIIb-mediated inhibitory pathways.
Materials and Methods
Animals, vaccination, and vaginal challenge
The 9 SIVmac239-ΔNef vaccinated female rhesus macaque monkeys (Macaca mulatta) described in this study were housed at the New England Primate Center in accordance with the regulations of the American Association of Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care and the standards of the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. Animals were vaccinated by infecting intravenously with SIVmac239-ΔNef supplied by Dr. Ronald C. Desrosiers. At 20 wk post vaccination, these animals were challenged vaginally twice in the same day (separated by 4 h) with 105 TCID50 of SIVmac251 supplied by Dr. Christopher J. Miller. The 3 naïve, uninfected animals and 5 unvaccinated controls for the same time points were from a previous study8 that had been similarly exposed vaginally with an identical stock of SIVmac251.
Tissue collection and processing
At the time of euthanasia, tissues were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde or SafeFix II and embedded in paraffin for later sectioning. To examine the critical anatomical niches in the female reproductive tract, the uterus, cervix, and vagina were dissected en block. The relevant region of cervix was dissected away from most of the uterus and vagina and then further divided into four quadrants. Tissue pieces from each quadrant were either snap-frozen, fixed as described, or used unfixed for other assays.
RNA extraction, synthesis of biotin-labeled cRNA probes, and microarray hybridization
These methods were performed as previously described (7).
Microarray data analysis
The R package “affy” was used to generate robust multi-chip average (RMA) values for all arrays based on the CEL files produced by the Affymetrix data analysis platform. Some samples had multiple arrays; hence the mean RMA values for those samples were computed and used in the subsequent analysis. The RMA algorithm produces a summary of gene expression on a log scale; we used this log scale for all analyses. To test for differences across groups, weighted least squares with an effect for group was used (weights were used because some RMA values were the mean of multiple measurements. The resulting p-values were converted to q-values using the q-vale package in R in order to look for genes of interest. Genes were selected based on their associated q-values (< 0.2) and fold change in expression (> 1.2).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described (8). The following antibodies with the indicated specificities were used: FCGR1A/CD64 EPR4623 (LifeSpan LS-B6707); FCGR2A/CD32a (Sigma HPA010718); FCGR2A/CD32a 19C10 (Novus Biologicals NBP1-47740); FCGR2B/CD32b (Abcam, catalog # ab45143, rabbit mAb, lot # GR32165-2; Abnova, catalog # H00002213-B01P, mouse pAb, lot # 08338 WULZ); FCGR2C/CD32c (Abgent AP8992b); CD16 2H7 (Novocastra NCL-CD16) These and other antibodies used are described in more detail in Supplemental Table 1.
Ex vivo organ culture
FRT tissue was removed from healthy, uninfected, adult Rhesus macaques (Worldwide Primates Inc., Miami, FL) and shipped overnight on wet ice. Cervix was isolated and dissected into small tissue pieces (5-10 mm in diameter × 5-10 mm in thickness) that were placed, mucosal surfaces exposed, atop hydrated collagen sponges (hydrated in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FCS and penicillin/streptomycin) in individual wells of 6-well tissue culture plates. Most experiments required explants to be incubated for 24 h at 37°C / 5% CO2. For experiments requiring longer incubation times, fresh complete medium was added drop-wise to hydrate tissue pieces twice a day. At the conclusion of the experiment, tissue pieces were fixed in SafeFix II before embedding in paraffin.
For immune complex formation, 1.2×105 Infectious Units of SIVmac251 32H were combined with excess (~ 7μg) antibody (gp41 monoclonal antibody 4.9C or serum from SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals) and incubated for 60 min at room temperature before application to explants. As a control, 1.2×105 Infectious Units of SIVmac251 32H was similarly admixed with serum from unvaccinated animals that had not been infected with SIV. For blocking FcγRIIb, explants were pre-incubated with 5 μg each of two FcγRIIb blocking antibodies (Abcam, catalog # ab45143, rabbit mAb, lot # GR32165-2; Abnova, catalog # H00002213-B01P, mouse pAb, lot # 08338 WULZ) for 30 min at 37°C / 5% CO2 before addition of immune complexes.
Statistics
Associations between continuous variables involving the four animal groups [uninfected, unvaccinated, vaccinated (prior to challenge), and challenge] were estimated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (after transforming to the log scale to stabilize the variance), and tests were conducted using the usual t test for a correlation. Differences in gene activity between vaccinated and unvaccinated animals were tested using a 2-sample t test for proportions (after transforming to the logarithmic scale to stabilize the variance). All calculations were conducted using the statistical software R, version 2.10.1.
Accession number
The microarray data sets were submitted to the GEO repository according to Minimum Information about a Microarray Experiment standards (GEO accession number: GSE33251). The URL for the data sets is http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE33251.
Results
Disrupted outside-in signaling and CD4+ T cell recruitment in vaccinated animals
In unvaccinated animals, the transition zone of ectocervix and adjoining endocervix are consistently sites where small founder populations of infected cells are first detected, and where these populations rapidly expand, fueled by an influx of CD4+ target cells. These target cells are recruited by an outside-in signaling circuit that begins with increased expression of MIP3-α in the lining epithelium (Fig. 1a,c,e, and model at bottom of the figure). MIP3-α then recruits CCR6+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), and the β-chemokines such as MIP1-β that the pDCs elaborate recruit CD4+ T cells to fuel local expansion (10-12). In vaccinated animals, this CD4+ T cell recruitment and outside-in signaling cascade was disrupted (Fig. 1b,d,f). There was no detectable influx of CD4+ T cells as a correlate of the inhibition of establishment and local expansion of infected founder populations at the portal of entry in vaccinated animals shown in the accompanying paper.
Figure 1.
Inhibition of CD4 T cell recruitment and outside in signaling in SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals. In naïve animals, brown-stained CD4 T cells (1a), MIP3a (circle, 1b) and pDCs (arrow in 1c) increase after vaginal exposure to the SIV inoculum. By contrast, no increases are evident 4 days post high dose vaginal challenge with SIVmac251 in the vaccinated animals (Fig. 1b,d,f). A model of outside in signaling in naïve animals, and inhibition in vaccinated animals (indicated by the blocked symbols) is shown at the bottom of Fig. 1, revised from ref. 9.
Mucosal epithelial system of expression of genes that inhibit the innate immune response to vaginal challenge
We sought clues to the mechanism of disrupted signaling and target cell recruitment comparing the transcriptional profiles of the responses in unvaccinated and vaccinated animals to high dose SIV vaginal challenge. To generate these comparisons, we determined changes in transcript levels between animals that had not been exposed to SIV (n = 3) and unvaccinated animals exposed intra-vaginally to WT SIVmac251 (n = 5) (transcriptional profile I, Fig. 2) and then compared vaccinated animals before WT SIV challenge (n = 4) with vaccinated animals after intra-vaginal challenge (n = 5) (transcriptional profile II, Fig. 2). We identified 405 transcripts significantly altered 4-5 days post exposure in the cervix of unvaccinated animals infected with WT SIVmac251 while only 246 transcripts were altered in SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals when challenged with the same virus and exposure (Fig. 2). Remarkably, there was almost no overlap in host response between unvaccinated and vaccinated animals exposed vaginally to WT SIV (~ 1% overlap, 5 transcripts in common, Fig. 2).
Figure 2.
Host responses of unvaccinated and SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals to vaginal WT SIVmac251exposure. The transcriptional response of unvaccinated and SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals to vaginal inoculation of WT SIVmac251 was determined by comparing transcript levels between uninfected, naïve animals (n = 3) with unvaccinated animals 4-5 days post WT SIVmac251 exposure (transcriptional profile I) and between vaccinated animals before challenge (140 days post vaccination) (n = 4) with vaccinated animals 4-5 days post WT SIVmac251 exposure (n = 5) (transcriptional profile II). (b) Venn diagram indicating minimal overlap of altered transcripts between unvaccinated animals exposed intra-vaginally to WT SIVmac251. The size of each region is proportional to the number of altered transcripts. Green and red numbers indicate, respectively, decreased and increased expression. Inflammation-moderating genes are significantly increased about 4 fold in the vaccinated animals after vaginal exposure to SIV.
In examining the proportion of RNA transcripts ascribed to a particular biological/functional category, we found that in the vaccinated animals there was significant enrichment of host response genes involved in moderating innate immunity and inflammation (Fig. 3a). These genes encode proteins involved in inhibiting production of type-I IFN (i.e., PCBP2) (13,14) and inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (i.e., COMMD1, COMMD10, PPM1B, SPRED1, RORA, IKBA, ELOB) via distinct intracellular mechanisms: e.g., SPRED1 (sprouty-related, EVH1 domain containing 1) negatively regulates the RAS/MAPK pathway (15,16); COMMD1 and COMMD10 (copper metabolism MURR1 domain containing 1) disrupt NF-κB binding of target genes in the nucleus (17,18); and RORA (RAR-related orphan receptor A) sequesters NF-κB in the cytoplasm (19,20). Expression of these inhibitory genes increased early after WT SIV exposure in the cervix of vaccinated animals, whereas expression of these genes remained unchanged or even decreased in the unvaccinated setting (Fig. 3b).
Figure 3.
Increased expression of inflammatory cytokine and chemokine inhibitors in the mucosal epithelium of the cervix in SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals. (a) Heat map of selected inhibitory genes with altered expression in the cervix of unvaccinated and SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals exposed vaginally to WT SIVmac251. A color scale is shown at bottom and ranges from 2-fold down-regulation to 5-fold up-regulation. (b) mRNA levels and corresponding protein expression of various genes in the cervix of unvaccinated and SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals 4-5 days post WT SIVmac251 exposure. SPRED1, COMMD1, and RORA mRNA levels are significantly increased compared to unvaccinated animals (p = 0.0004, p = 0.047, p = 0.032, respectively). (c) The respective proteins are predominantly expressed in the endocervical epithelium. Original magnifications: ×200; scale bars: 50 μm.
The spatial and temporal expression patterns of these genes was at the right place and time to dampen the inflammatory and chemotactic signaling cascade engendered by the host’s immune system that facilitates early virus propagation and spread (12). These inhibitory proteins were expressed at higher levels in the vaccinated animals compared to the controls predominantly in the single layer of columnar epithelial cells lining the mucosal surface of the endocervix (Fig. 3c). Consistent with the notion that a concerted inhibitory response within the FRT might be dampening the early chemotactic and inflammatory signalling cascade, we found that expression of numerous inhibitory genes negatively correlated with markers of inflammation in SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals (Fig. 4).
Figure 4.
Inhibitors of inflammation whose expression increased in the cervix of SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals inversely correlate with expression of genes mediating inflammation. COMMD1 = copper metabolism MURR1 domain containing 1; IL-8 = interleukin 8; ATF7 = activating transcription factor 7 (ATF7 transcriptionally represses innate immune genes); CDC37 = cell division cycle 37 (CDC37 acts as co-chaperone in activating the IFN pathway); PPM1B = protein phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent, 1B (PPM1B plays an important role in termination of cytokine-mediated NF-κB activation as well as inhibits IL-1-induced inflammation); PCBP2 = poly(rC) binding protein 2 (PCBP2 inhibits RIG-I and MDA-5 innate signaling pathway); IKBA = inhibitor of κB, α (IKBA sequesters NF-κB in the cytoplasm, preventing NF-κB-mediated transcription of inflammatory genes); SHC1 = SHC (Src homology 2 domain containing) transforming protein 1 (SHC1 is involved in IL-5- and IL-6-mediated inflammation). White, black, red, and blue circles represent respectively uninfected animals, unvaccinated animals infected intra-vaginally with WT SIVmac251 for 4-5 days, SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals, and SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals infected intra-vaginally with WT SIVmac251 for 4-5 days.
Immune complex interactions with FcγRIIb in cervical epithelium mediates inhibition of signaling and CD4+ T cell recruitment
SIVmac239-ΔNef vaccination thus induces coordinated expression in mucosal epithelial cells of genes associated with inhibition of the transmission-facilitating innate response in unvaccinated animals. Why would exposure to the viral inoculum elicit such a profoundly different response? In seeking an answer to this question, we focused on SIV-specific antibodies acting at the mucosal surface, because in the accompanying paper we had found gp41t antibodies were concentrated at the mucosal border in the FRT by the FcRn, and concentrated gp41t antibodies at that site correlated with prevention/constriction of infected founder populations in the cervix during this same timeframe. Since these antibodies might form ICs with virus in the inoculum, we hypothesized that the ICs so-formed might interact with the inhibitory Fc receptor for IgG, FcγRIIb to then trigger an anti-inflammatory program, based on the ample precedents for such a mechanism (21).
We tested the main prediction of the hypothesis that FcγRIIb would be in the cervical lining epithelium where it could interact with IC by staining cervical sections with antibodies to FcγRIIb, and documented expression in the cervical lining epithelium in both naïve (not shown) and vaccinated animals following vaginal exposure to SIV (Fig. 5a). We only detected expression of the inhibitory FcγRIIb receptor in cervical epithelium, but not the activating receptors, FcγRIIa, c; FcγRI; and FcγRIII (Supplemental Figure 1). We then showed that FcγRIIb co-localized with SIV antibodies and the major SIV p27 protein in the cervical epithelium of vaccinated animals (Fig. 5b,c), but not in unvaccinated animals, where neither viral antibodies nor p27 antigen were detectable (not shown).
Figure 5.
FcγRIIb (Fc fragment of IgG, low affinity IIb, receptor) expression is increased in the cervical epithelium of SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals following vaginal challenge with WT SIV, and spatially co-localizes with SIV protein and SIV-specific antibodies. (a) Green-stained FcγRIIb+ columnar epithelium lining the endocervix. Sections have been stained with antibodies to the FcRn to show that FcRn is not expressed in the lining epithelium in rhesus macaques. The red-stained FcRn+ cells in the merged confocal micrograph are mainly in the submucosa. (b,c) FcγRIIb (green) co-localizes with SIV-specific antibodies [red, stained using a monoclonal antibody against a collection of public idiotypes of antibodies to HIV-1 and SIV (22,23)] (b) and the major virion p27 protein (orange) (c) along the mucosal surface of the endocervix in SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals challenged with WT SIVmac251. The insets show the total number of cells (cell nuclei appear blue) in each image. Original magnifications: X200; scale bars: 50 μm.
These results thus support the hypothesis that antibodies form ICs with virus in the inoculum that then interact with and trigger an anti-inflammatory program mediated by FcγRIIb. To test mechanistic predictions of this hypothesis that we could not test in vivo, we used an explant system (24) derived from cervices of naïve, uninfected rhesus macaques in which we could examine Fc-receptor expression and effects of immune complexes on the innate signaling system (MIP-3α), inhibitory mediators SPRED1 and COMMD1, and migration of pre-existing CD4+ T cells in the explants.
In this ex vivo system, we first documented expression of the inhibitory FcγRIIb-receptor in the epithelium, but not the activating receptors, FcγRIIa,c; FcγRI; and FcγRIII (Fig. 6). We then reproduced the anti-inflammatory effects and inhibition of target cell recruitment observed in vivo with SIV-specific ICs and FcγRIIb (Fig. 7): (1) exposure of the endocervical epithelium for 24 h to media alone (uninfected control) did not elicit increased expression of the innate signaling system (MIP-3α), the inhibitory mediators SPRED1 and COMMD1, or increase the numbers of CD4+ T cells in the submucosa (Fig. 7a); in contrast, exposure to WT SIVmac251 32H (+SIV) did increase expression of MIP-3α but not SPRED1 and COMMD1, and CD4+ T cell density increased (Fig. 7b); (2) exposure of the endocervical epithelium for 24 h to SIV-specific ICs (formed by pre-incubating SIVmac251 32H with serum from vaccinated animals, or with the gp41 rhesus monoclonal antibody 4.9C (25) that reacts with the trimeric form of gp41 in Western blots identically to the antibodies elicited by SIVmac239-ΔNef vaccination, increased expression of SPRED1 and COMMD1, while MIP-3α and CD4+ T cell density were essentially unchanged from untreated samples (Fig. 7c,d); (3) intact, SIV-specific ICs were needed to elicit these innate inhibitory proteins in the mucosal epithelium as antibody alone (similar to untreated, data not shown), disruption of antibody-antigen complexes using a mild acid-base treatment (data not shown) or a non-specific antibody+ virus (Fig. 7e) did not prevent increased expression of MIP-3α and increased CD4+ T cell density, and /or increase expression of SPRED1 and COMMD1; and (4) blocking FcγRIIb increased expression of MIP-3α, decreased expression of SPRED1 and COMMD1, and increased CD4+ T cell density (Fig. 7f).
Figure 6.
Only FcγRIIb is expressed in columnar epithelium lining the endocervix in primary cervical explants from vaccinated rhesus macaques. (a) FcγRIIb+ red-stained epithelium. Antibodies to FcγRIIa and c (b), (c) FcγRI (d) and FcγRIII (e) do not stain endocervical epithelium in explants. (f). Isotype staining control. Original magnifications, 10×.
Figure 7.
SIV-specific immune complexes interact with FcγRIIb in primary cervical explants from rhesus macaques to dampen outside in signaling and submucosal increases in CD4+ T cell density through increased expression of inhibitory genes (a) Exposure of the endocervical epithelium to media alone (uninfected control) did not elicit increased expression of MIP-3α, innate response moderators (SPRED1, COMMD1) or increase CD4+ T cell density; (b) Exposure to WT SIVmac251 32H (+SIV) did increase expression of MIP-3α (red-stained epithelium) but not SPRED1, COMMD1; density of red-brown-stained CD4+ T cells increases. (c,d) Exposure to SIV-specific ICs (formed by pre-incubating SIVmac251 32H with serum from vaccinated animals, or with the gp41 rhesus monoclonal antibody 4.9C20 that reacts with the trimeric form of gp41 in Western blots identically to the antibodies elicited by SIVmac239-ΔNef vaccination), increased expression of SPRED1 and COMMD1 (brown-stained epithelium), while MIP-3α and CD4+ T cell density were essentially unchanged from untreated samples. (e) SIVmac251 32H+ nonspecific antibody effects were indistinguishable from SIV alone. (f) SIV-specific immune complexes do not up-regulate SPRED1 and COMMD1 or increase MIP-3α, or CD4+ T cell density in explants pre-treated with FcγRIIb blocking antibodies.
Discussion
In these studies of protection associated with SIVmac239-ΔNef vaccination, we have identified two spatial and temporal correlates at the portal of entry (Fig. 8). In the accompanying paper, we provide evidence that Correlate 1 in the cervix is an organized system of local production of antibody to gp41t, concentrated on the path of virus entry by FcRn-mediated mechanisms, as a correlate of preventing establishment or constraining the size of founder populations of infected cells. Here we provide evidence that Correlate 2 is inhibition of target cell recruitment to fuel local expansion of any foci of infected cells. In this case, a second Fc receptor, the inhibitory FcγRIIb receptor mediates the inhibition.
Figure 8.
Model of correlates of protection against vaginal challenge in the cervix conferred by SIVmac239-ΔNef vaccination. In the accompanying paper, Correlate 1 was an organized system to locally produce antibodies to gp41t and concentrate these antibodies on the path of virus entry by FcRn-mediated mechanisms operating in cervical reserve epithelium underlying the epithelium lining the transition zone and adjoining endocervix. These antibodies by a number of mechanisms could then prevent or restrict establishment of infected founder populations. In this paper, Correlate 2 was inhibition of target cell recruitment to fuel local expansion. This inhibition was mediated by immune complexes engaging the inhibitory receptor, FcγRIIb, with subsequent expression of an anti-inflammatory program that suppresses outside-in signaling and the recruitment of CD4 T cells.
The two correlates are interrelated because the concentrated antibodies at mucosal frontlines form immune complexes with incoming virus that can then interact with the inhibitory Fc-receptor, FcγRIIb, appropriately positioned in the lining epithelium. While we have not identified the proximate signaling events, we show that the co-localization of SIV-ICs and FcγRIIb is associated with a coordinated gene expression program that inhibits the innate and inflammatory response to vaginal exposure to the SIV inoculum. Collectively these genes block the outside in signaling system and CD4 T cell recruitment that in naïve animals facilitates transmission by providing cellular substrates to expand infection at the portal of entry.
What we find quite fascinating by this initially surprising and counter intuitive response in vaccinated animals to vaginal challenge is the possibility that this system is representative of a general way for the immune system to immediately distinguish at mucosal frontlines between a pathogen that it has or has not previously seen. By localizing the sensing and inhibitory system in the mucosal epithelium and utilizing the inhibitory Fc-receptor, FcγRIIb, the immune system can “see” ICs formed by antibodies induced by prior antigen exposure, and modulate the initial response to exposure to a response that does not engender a counterproductive inflammatory response.
There are parallels between the association of protection in SIVmac239-ΔNef-vaccinated animals with inhibition of outside-in signaling, CD4 T cell recruitment and local expansion, and protection against high dose vaginal challenge afforded by the microbicide, glycerol monolaurate (GML). GML also inhibits MIP-3α production in the rhesus macaque FRT, and is thought in this way to block the outside in signaling that facilitates transmission. Thus, inhibiting innate and inflammatory responses to SIV, and, by extension, to HIV-1 may be an important general component of preventive strategies to prevent transmission to women.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank Ronald C. Desrosiers and Christopher J. Miller for virus stocks, James E. Robinson for the gp41 monoclonal antibody 4.9C, Heinz Kohler and Sybille Müller for the 1F7 monoclonal antibody to public idiotypes of HIV/SIV antibodies, Angela Carville for expert veterinary care, Elizabeth Curra and Andrew Miller for assistance with tissue processing and analysis, Olivia N. Chuang-Smith and Lucy L. Qu for help with immunohistochemistry, and Colleen O’Neill for preparation of the manuscript.
This work was supported by the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, NIH grants AI071306 and RR00168, and, in part, with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under contract HHSN261200800001E.
Abbreviations used
- COMMD1
copper metabolism MURR1 domain containing 1
- FcRn
neonatal Fc receptor
- FRT
female reproductive tract
- gp41t
trimeric form of the viral envelope glycoprotein
- IC
immune complex
- RMA
robust multi-chip average
- RORA
RAR-related orphan receptor A
- SIV
simian immunodeficiency virus
- SPRED1
sprouty-related, EVH1 domain containing 1
- VL
viral load
References
- 1.Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, Vargas L, Goicocheea P, Casapía M, Guanira-Carranza JV, Ramirez-Cardich ME, Montoya-Herrera O, Fernández T, Veloso VG, Buchbinder SP, Chariyalerstak S, Schechter M, Bekker LG, Mayer KH, Kallás EG, Amico KR, Mulligan K, Buxhman LR, Hance RJ, Ganoza C, Defechereux P, Postle B, Wang F, McConnell JJ, Zheng JH, Lee J, Rooney JF, Jaffe HS, Martinez AI, Burns DN, Glidden DV, the iPrEx Study Team Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. New. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363:2587–2599. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Abdool Karim Q, Abdool Karim SS, Frohlich JA, Grobler AC, Baxter C, Mansoor LE, Kharsany ABM, Sibeko S, Mlisana KP, Omar Z, Gengiah TN, Maarschalk S, Arulappan N, Mlotshwa M, Morris L, Taylor D, the CAPRISA 004 Trial Group Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women. Science. 2010;329:1168–1174. doi: 10.1126/science.1193748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Daniel MD, Kirchhoff F, Czajak SC, Sehgal PK, K. P, Desrosiers RC. Protective effects of a live attenuated SIV vaccine with a deletion in the nef gene. Science. 1992;258:1938–1941. doi: 10.1126/science.1470917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Johnson RP. Live attenuated AIDS vaccines: hazards and hopes. Nat. Med. 1999;5:154–155. doi: 10.1038/5515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Koff WC, Johnson RP, Watkins DW, Burton DR, Lifson JD, Hasenkrug KJ, McDermott AB, Schultz A, Zamb TJ, Boyle R, Desrosiers RC. HIV vaccine design: insights from live atenuated SIV vaccines. Nat. Immunol. 2006;7:19–23. doi: 10.1038/ni1296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Smith AJ, Li Q, Wietgrefe SW, Schacker TW, Reilly CS, Haase AT. Host genes associated with HIV-1 replication in lymphatic tissue. J. Immunol. 2010a;185:5417–5424. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Smith AJ, Schacker TW, Reilly CS, Haase AT. A role for syndecan-1 and claudin-2 in microbial translocation during HIV-1 infection. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2010b;55:306–315. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181ecfeca. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haase AT. Targeting early infection to prevent HIV-1 mucosal transmission. Nature. 2010;464:217–223. doi: 10.1038/nature08757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang ZQ, Schuler T, Zupancic M, Wietgrefe S, Reimann KA, Reinhart TA, Rogan M, Cavert W, Miller CJ, Veazey RS, Notermans D, Little S, Danner SA, Richman DD, Havlir D, Wong J, Jordan HL, Schacker TW, Racz P, Tenner-Racz K, Letvin NL, Wolinsky S, Haase AT. Sexual transmission and propagation of simian and human immunodeficiency viruses in two distinguishable populations of CD4+ T cells. Science. 1999;286:1353–1357. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5443.1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Miller CJ, Li Q, Abel K, Kim E-Y, Ma Z-M, Wietgrefe S, LaFranco-Scheuch L, Compton L, Duan L, Shore MD, Zupancic M, Busch M, Carlis J, Wolinsky S, Haase AT. Propagation and dissemination of infection after vaginal transmission of simian immunodeficiency virus. J. Virol. 2005;79:9217–9227. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.14.9217-9227.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li Q, Estes JD, Schlievert PM, Duan L, Brosnahan AJ, Southern PJ, Reilly CS, Peterson ML, Schultz-Darken N, Brunner KG, Nephew KR, Pambuccian S, Lifson JD, Carlis JV, Haase AT. Glycerol monolaurate prevents mucosal SIV transmission. Nature. 2009;458:1034–1038. doi: 10.1038/nature07831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.You F, Sun H, Zhou X, Sun W, Liang S, Zhai Z, Jiang Z. PCBP2 mediates degradation of the adaptor MAVS via the HECT ubiquitin ligase AIP4. Nat. Immunol. 2009;10:1300–1308. doi: 10.1038/ni.1815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhou X, You F, Chen H, Jiang Z. Poly(C)-binding protein 1 (PCBP1) mediates housekeeping degradation of mitochondrial antiviral signaling (MAVS) Cell Res. 2012;22:717–727. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yoshimura A. Regulation of cytokine signaling by the SOCS and Spred family proteins. Keio J. Med. 2009;58:73–83. doi: 10.2302/kjm.58.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Akbulut S, Reddi AL, Aggarwal P, Ambardekar C, Canciani B, Kim MK, Hix L, Vilimas T, Mason J, Basson MA, Lovatt M, Powell J, Collins S, Quatela S, Phillips M, Licht JD. Sprouty proteins inhibit receptor-mediated activation of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2010;21:3487–3496. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-02-0123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Burstein E, Hoberg JE, Wilkinson AS, Rumble JM, Csomos R.a., Komarck CM, Maine GN, Wilkinson JC, Mayo MW, Duckett CS. COMMD proteins, a novel family of structural and functional homologs of MURR1. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:22222–22232. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501928200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Maine GN, Burstein E. COMMD proteins and the control of the NF kappa B pathway. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:672–676. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.6.3989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Delerive P, Monté D, Dubois G, Trottein F, Fruchart-Najib J, Mariani J, Fruchart JC, Staels B. The orphan nuclear receptor ROR alpha is a negative regulator of the inflammatory response. EMBO Rep. 2001;2:42–48. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dzhagalov I, Zhang N, He YW. The roles of orphan nuclear receptors in the development and function of the immune system. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2004;1:401–407. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV. Fc-receptors as regulators of immunity. Adv. Immunol. 2007;96:179–204. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(07)96005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang H, Müller S, Zolla-Pazner S, Köhler H. Human monoclonal and polyclonal anti-human immunodeficiency virus-1 antibodies share a common clonotypic specificity. Eur. J. Immunol. 1992;22:1749–1755. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830220713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Müller S, Margolin DH, Min G. An HIV-1 infection-related idiotype/clonotype (1F7) is expressed on antibodies directed to envelope glycoprotein in simian immunodeficiency virus- and chimeric simian/human immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus monkeys. Hybridoma. 1997;16:17–21. doi: 10.1089/hyb.1997.16.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Southern PJ, Horbul JE, Miller BR, Maher DM. Coming of age: reconstruction of heterosexual HIV-1 transmission in human ex vivo organ culture systems. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4:383–396. doi: 10.1038/mi.2011.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cole KS, Alvarez M, Elliott DH, Lam H, Martin E, Chau T, Micken K, Rowles JL, Clements JE, Murphey-Corb M, Montelaro RC, Robinson JE. Characterization of neutralization epitopes of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) recognized by rhesus monoclonal antibodies derived from monkeys infected with an attenuated SIV strain. Virology. 2001;290:59–73. doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.








