Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 9.
Published in final edited form as: Int Trends Immun. 2014 Apr;2(2):87–92.

Anti-HSV activity of serpin antithrombin III

Debra C Quenelle 1, Tracy L Hartman 2, Robert W Buckheit 2, Mark N Prichard 1, Ralf Geiben Lynn 3,*
PMCID: PMC4158439  NIHMSID: NIHMS583454  PMID: 25215309

Abstract

Natural serine protease inhibitors (serpins) elicit sensing of a microbial cell intruder and activate an intrinsic cellular immune response in HIV and HCV infected cells. Here, we demonstrate in vitro inhibition of HSV with serpin antithrombin III (ATIII) early during infection pointing towards inhibition of an entry event. We also found reduction of mortality from 90% to 40% in an abrasion mice model demonstrating a strong reduction of infection in vivo. Our data also indicated that this treatment might be suitable for drug-resistant viruses since high inhibition of an acyclovir-resistant HSV-1 strain was found. Thus, an ATIII tropical treatment might be used for immunocompromised patients where prolonged treatment leads to drug resistant HSV-1 strains. Understanding how ATIII regulates HSV-1 infections may reveal new avenues for therapeutic interventions.

Keywords: Antithrombin III, HSV, serine protease inhibitor, serpin, acyclovir-resistant HSV-1, mice abrasion model

I. INTRODUCTION

The long-term treatment of herpesvirus infections with current antivirals especially in immunocompromised hosts leads to the development of drug-resistant viruses. Nearly all currently available antivirals finally target viral DNA polymerases, therefore virus resistant to one drug often shows cross-resistance to other drugs. In addition, nearly all the current antivirals show various kinds of side effects or poor bioavailability. The prevalence of acyclovir (ACV)-resistant HSV among immunocompromised patients is approximately 5%, and reaches 14% among bone marrow transplant recipients [13].

The increasing number of immunocompromised individuals, particularly AIDS and transplant patients, has driven the need for improved antiviral agents to treat diseases caused by herpesviruses. This evidence highlights the need for developing new antivirals for herpesviruses that have a different mode of action. Novel antiviral drugs that target cellular proteins instead of viral targets have the advantage that targets are immutable [4]. This approach might reduce the occurrence of resistant viruses.

However, the inhibitors of cellular proteins essential for viral replication might be constrained by significant side effects. Therefore, we utilized a unique search strategy to limit possible side-effects. We searched for an anti-viral factor in a disease population which did not get sick in spite of being infected with a life threatening virus and being untreated. We reasoned that such an intrinsic anti-viral factor should show a good toxicology profile. We isolated the serine protease inhibitor (serpin) antithrombin III (ATIII) as one factor responsible for HIV-1 inhibition in CD8+ T cells of long-term non-progressors [5, 6], a patient population infected by HIV-1 for more than 10 years but which do not progress to AIDS. Testing ATIII against 18 pathogenic human viruses and sub-strains we further found that ATIII had a broad-spectrum anti-viral activity for HIV-1, HCV and HSV [7].

Herpes virus is spread through direct skin to skin or mucous membrane contact. Transmission likely occurs during symptomatic reactivation of latent virus. HSV-1 is typically acquired orally during childhood, but may also be sexually transmitted with approximately 30% of genital herpes in the U.S. caused by HSV-1 [8]. HSV-1 infection provides some immunity against subsequent infection with HSV-2. Symptoms from the primary infection with HSV are usually more severe than subsequent outbreaks due to lack of an antibody response. Latent infection of HSV typically in the neural ganglia results from 1.) the ability of HSV to evade the immune system through interference with MHC class I presentation of antigen on the cell surface by blocking the TAP transporter through secretion of ICP-47 and 2.) expression of latency associated transcript (LAT) RNA that regulates the host cell genome and interferes with natural cell death mechanisms [9].

In the first year of infection with HSV-1, the rate of asymptomatic shedding is approximately 5% without observable symptoms and the recurrence rate is 50% [10]. Though it has not yet been explained, the rate of viral shedding decreases over time. The frequency and severity of outbreaks depends on three factors: 1.) how well the person’s immune system can control the infection, 2.) how long the person has been infected, and 3.) whether the virus established latency in its site of preference with less severe symptoms occurring when HSV-1 persists outside the trigeminal ganglia. Current systemic treatments for HSV-1 which inhibit the HSV DNA polymerase include ACV and its prodrug, valacyclovir, and famciclovir, the prodrug of penciclovir. FDA approved topical treatments include ACV, penciclovir and docosanol. Treatments reduce virus replication but do not cure the infection.

Our product development strategy utilizes a topical microbicides based on a critical component of the coagulation cascade which is also part of an early innate immune response [11]. Our studies aim to develop a topically applied product which will reduce or eliminate the severity of symptoms during reactivation episodes and reduce the transmission of HSV from virus shedding. We demonstrated that after activation of the serine protease activity through heparin the activated hep-ATIII inhibits HSV-1 and HSV-2 [7]. It is possible that ATIII might be used as a single topical agent or in combination with other antiviral agents against HSV to target multiple steps of virus replication at the same time.

II. METHODS

Ethical Statements

All animals were housed and maintained in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals [12], and all studies and procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of University of Alabama at Birmingham. The University of Alabama follows NIH guidelines for animal handling and has an Animal Welfare Assurance on file with the Office for Protection of Research Risks. This institution maintains full accreditation from Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.

Viruses

HSV-1FL, HSV-1HF, HSV-1KOS, HSV-1MacIntyre HSV-1E-377 and the ACV-resistant HSV-1DM2.1 were described earlier [1317].

Production of hep-ATIII

Recombinant human ATIII was produced in transgenic goats by GTC Biotherapeutics (Framingham, MA). These transgenic animals express human ATIII in their mammary glands and secrete it into their milk. ATIII was purified from goat milk through clarification through a 500-kDa tangential flow membrane filtration unit, captured and then eluted through a heparin affinity chromatography column. It was further purified by anion exchange chromatography and hydrophobic interaction chromatography as described earlier [18]. ATIII was activated with equal amounts (w/w) of heparin sodium (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, cat. no. 01491, 3–5 kDa fraction) overnight at 37 °C to form a non-covalent ATIII-heparin complex. Unbound heparin was then removed by Sephacel 100 ÄKTA FPLC (GE Health Care Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ) at 1 ml/min. Protein preparations resulted in less than 5% (w/w) free heparin measured by FPLC with refractive index detection as described earlier [19]. Protein purity was more than 99% as determined by dodecyl sulfate-polyacryl-amide (SDS-PAGE) gel electrophoresis and silver staining using a Bio-Rad kit (Bio-Rad Life Science, Hercules, CA), or by C4 high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Molecular weight was 60 kDa as compared to a low-range protein molecular weight marker (Bio-Rad) [20].

Formulation of the hep-ATIII in carbopol gel vehicle

Hep-ATIII (20 mg/ml in PBS) was stable > 30 days at 4° C. This solution was mixed at a 1:1 ratio with a 1.5% carbopol gel for the application. Mixture was loaded into 1-cc syringes and stored refrigerated for the duration of the study. Five percent (w/w) ACV (Zovirax®, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals) in polyethylene glycol base was used as a control and maintained at room temperature.

Cells

Human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells were prepared from human foreskin tissue. The HFF cells were expanded through serial passages in standard growth medium of MEM with Earl’s salts supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS and antibiotics. The cells were passaged routinely and used for assays at or below passage 10. For comparative studies we also used Vero (African green monkey kidney) cells.

Determination of in vitro inhibitory efficacy by cytopathic effect (CPE) reduction assay

Low passage (3–10) HFF cells were trypsinized, counted, and seeded into 96 well tissue culture plates in 0.1 ml of MEM supplemented with 10% FBS. The cells were then incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C. The experimental drug was added in triplicate wells. Media alone was added to both cell and virus control wells. The drug was then diluted serially 1:5. The plates were then incubated for 60 min and 100 µl of a virus suspension was added to each well, excluding cell control wells which received 100 µl of MEM. The plates were then incubated at 37°C in a CO2 incubator for three days. After the incubation period, media was aspirated and the cells were stained with crystal violet in formalin for 4 hours. The stain was then removed and the plates were rinsed until all excess stain was removed. The plates were allowed to dry for 24 hours and the amount of stain as measure for CPE in each well was determined using a BioTek Multiplate Autoreader. The 50% effective concentration (EC50) and the 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50) values were determined by comparing drug treated and untreated cells. To determine if each compound has sufficient anti-viral activity that exceeded its level of toxicity, a selectivity index (SI) was calculated according to CC50/ EC50. An inhibition that had a SI of 10 or greater was considered to have useful anti-viral activity.

Determination of in vitro inhibitory efficacy by plaque reduction assay

Monolayers of HFF cells were prepared in six-well plates and incubated at 37°C for 2 days to allow the cells to reach confluency. Media was then aspirated from the wells and 0.2 ml of virus was added to each of three wells to yield 20–30 plaques in each well. The virus was allowed to adsorb to the cells for 1 hour and the plates were agitated every 15 minutes. Compounds were diluted in assay media consisting of MEM with Earl’s salts supplemented with 2% (v/v) FBS, and antibiotics. Solutions ranging from 0.1 to 300 µM were added to duplicate wells and the plates were incubated for various times, depending on the virus used. The monolayers were then stained with 1% crystal violet in 20% methanol and the unbound dye removed by washing with dH20. For all assays, plaques were enumerated using a stereomicroscope and the concentration of compound that reduced plaque formation by 50% (EC50) was interpolated from the experimental data. Cytotoxicity was measured in parallel by XTT staining.

Time addition experiments

To test if inhibition was at the entry stage or post-entry HFF cells were infected as described above and drug was added at the same time or 2 hours after infection.

HSV-1 in vivo inhibition test

Groups of 10 SKH-1 Elite females (Charles River Laboratories), approximately 5–6 weeks old at study initiation were randomly assigned to three groups for efficacy.

Oral antibiotics (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or Baytril) were added to water bottles 24 hours prior to viral inoculations. Mice were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine. Abrasions were performed carefully with an engraving bit attached to a hand held Dremmel Tool at a depth not sufficient to cause bleeding. The abraded area had a triangular shaped area over the nasal bones from the nose leather to the eyes. The abraded area was swabbed for 10 seconds with a 1×105 pfu/ml HSV-1E-377 in MEM soaked Dacron swab.

Mice were treated topically three times daily with hep-ATIII gel for 7 days beginning 24 hours post viral inoculation. Doses of the gels were applied with a Dacron swab using approximately 30 µl/mouse and treatments were applied after viral swabs and clinical observations of lesion symptoms were performed. ACV treatments started after 24 hours, three times daily for 7 days. To determine the effect of treatment on the development and severity of lesions, severity of symptoms was graded on a 0.0 to 5.0 scale in 0.5 increments (Table I). The presence or absence of lesions and severity of lesions was recorded daily beginning day 1 through day 21 post-challenge.

Table I.

Scale for Lesions Symptoms

Scale Symptoms
0.0 normal
0.5 whole face red & swollen, 1–2 discrete lesions on face
1.0 3–5 discrete lesions on face
1.5 25% confluency or scabs on face
2.0 50% confluency or scabs on face
2.5 75% confluency or scabs on face
3.0 75–100% confluency or scabs on face
3.5 2.5% necrotic tissue
4.0 50% necrotic tissue
4.5 75% necrotic tissue
5.0 75–100% necrotic tissue

Swabs for viral quantitation of inoculation sites was taken at days 2–8 and 10 prior to first daily treatments. Samples will be frozen at −70°C until titrated on HFF cells.

Animals were observed daily for signs of systemic viral disease. Groups of mice treated with antivirals were compared to vehicle-treated groups for statistical evaluation.

Measurement of virus titer

Swab samples were collected with a pre-moistened Dacron swab. The swab samples were placed in 1 mL of maintenance medium and stored frozen at −80 °C until virus titration using the plaque assay. HFF cells were seeded into a 96-well tissue culture plate at 1×105 cells/well and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 for 3 days. After cells formed a monolayer with approximately 70% confluency, the growth medium was removed, and samples in triplicate were serially diluted 10-fold using an automated liquid handler. The plates were incubated for 5 days at 37 °C. in a 5% CO2 incubator. The CPE was read using a microscope and HSV-1 titers were calculated as tissue infection dose 50% (TCID50) using the Reed & Muench method of calculation.

Statistical Evaluation

Topical lesion data are presented as means and the standard deviation (SD). In the efficacy study, infection rates, peak virus titers, virus titer–day areas under the curves (AUC), peak lesion scores and lesion score–day AUC between drug and vehicle treated groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-Rank Sum Test. Mortality rates were analyzed by Fisher's exact test and checked for a 21-day interval. The mean day of death (MDD) data were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U-Rank Sum Test. P-values of 0.05 or less were considered to be statistically significant.

III. RESULTS

Comparative in vitro anti-viral activity of Hep-ATIII and ACV

We expanded on earlier in vitro HSV-1 inhibition experiments and performed additional experiments in Vero cells and HFF and compared the hep-ATIII activity to the current HSV-1 treatment (Table II). We found that hep-ATIII had routinely a higher efficacy (up to 10 fold) than the ACV compare in our infection models. We found that the SI was > 10 for all of our experiments. Thus, no cytotoxicity was found for the concentrations tested. This demonstrated that hep-ATIII had good in vitro anti-viral activity independent on the cell type used.

Table II.

Activity of Hep-ATIII in compare to ACV incytoprotection assays with different strains of viruses and target cells1

Compound (µM) Vero
HSV-1FL
Vero
HSV-1HF
Vero
HSV-1KOS
HFF
HSV-1FL
HFF
HSV-1KOS
HFF
HSV-1MacIntyre
EC50 Fold
ACV
activity
EC50 Fold
ACV
activity
EC50 Fold
ACV
activity
EC50 Fold
ACV
activity
EC50 Fold
ACV
activity
EC50 Fold
ACV
activity
Hep-ATIII 2.3 3.2 2.2 2.7 1.4 1.8 2.8 3.1 1 10 6.3 0.6
1

HFF cells (less than 10 passages) were added to a 24-well flat-bottom plate at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well 24 hours prior to assay initiation. Virus diluted to a pre-determined titer (20–30 pfu/well) was then added to the plates for 1 hour. Serially diluted compound was added to the cells in triplicate to the infected monolayers. The plates were incubated for 3 days at 37°C/5% CO2. Efficacy was evaluated with a plaque quantification endpoint by staining the monolayers with crystal violet. Cytotoxicity was measured in parallel.

Identification of virus life cycle inhibition step and inhibition capacity for ACV-resistant strain

In order to test if hep-ATIII inhibits at the stage of entry or post-entry we added the compound at the same time with the virus to the cells or 2 hours post infection. We used two HSV-1 strains for our experiments E-377 and the ACV-resistant DM2.1; both strains were strongly inhibited at EC50 of 0.54 and 0. 52 µM and EC90 of 3.9 and 1 µM, respectively. We found that the majority of inhibition was at the entry level since inhibition was lost when hep-ATIII was added 2 hours after infection (EC50 > 5 µM).

Hep-ATIII treatment might be used to treat ACV-resistant HSV-1 in immunocompromised patients. Therefore, we tested hep-ATIII activity for DM2.1, an isolate which is not inhibited by ACV even at concentrations > 100 µM. We found that the hep-ATIII anti-viral activity was similar to that found for ACV-sensitive strains.

Effect of hep-ATIII on mortality and on mean day of death (MDD)

We utilized SKH-1 mice to measure inhibition of mortality. Topical treatment with vehicle, ACV and hep-ATIII were applied 3 times daily starting at 6 AM for 7 consecutive days daily in 6 hours intervals beginning 24 hours post viral inoculations. We used an amount of virus for infection which led to at least 90% mortality and a MDD 7.4 days in the vehicle control (Table III). The Zovirax® gel control reduced mortality 100% in our animal model. Hep-ATIII used at 10 mg/ml reduced mortality 2.3-fold (P<0.01) but MDD was 7.5±0.6 and unaffected.

Table III.

Effect of topical treatment with heparin activated antithrombin III (hep-ATIII) on the mortality of SKH-1 mice infected orofacially with HSV-1

Mortality
Treatmenta Number Percent P-value MDD ± STDb P-value
Vehicle
Carbopol gel 9/10 90 --- 7.4 ± 1.7 ---
Zovirax
5% ACV 0/10 0 <0.001 --- ---
Hep-ATIII
10 mg/ml 4/10 40 <0.01 7.5 ± 0.6 NSc
a.

Topical treatments with vehicle, ACV, and hep-ATIII were applied topically 3 times daily for 7 consecutive days in 6 hour intervals beginning 24 hours post viral inoculation.

b.

MDD = Mean Day of Death. STD = Standard Deviation.

c.

NS = Not significant when compared to the appropriate vehicle control.

Effect of hep-ATIII effect on lesion day AUC, mean peak lesion score, virus titer day AUC and mean peak virus score

Hairless SKH-1 mice allow a standardized scoring to measure the HSV-1 lesion symptoms (Table I). All mice developed lesions. Lesion day AUC values were lowest in the ACV treated group (4.1) compared to the vehicle treated group (17.4) or the hep-ATIII treated group (12.4) although all these treatments did not achieve statistical significance (Table IV). The comparisons of mean peak lesion scores were not statistically different: The ACV treated groups had the lowest value (1.3±0.5) compared to the vehicle group (3.0±0.2) or hep-ATIII group (2.9±0.3) (Table IV).

Table IV.

Effect of topical treatment with heparin activated antithrombin III (hep-ATIII) on the facial lesion development of SKH-1 mice infected orofacially with HSV-1

Treatmenta #With Lesions/
#Inoculated
Lesion-
Day
AUC
P-Value Mean Peak
Lesion Score (AUC)
P-Value
Vehicle
Carbopol gel 10/10 17.4 --- 3.0 ± 0.2 ---
Zovirax
5 % ACV 10/10 4.1 NSb 1.3 ± 0.5 NSb
Hep-ATIII
10 mg/ ml 10/10 12.4 NSb 2.9 ± 0.3 NSb
a.

Topical treatments with vehicle, ACV, and hep-ATIII were applied topically 3 times daily for 7 consecutive days in 6 hour intervals beginning 24 hours post viral inoculation.

b.

NS = non-significant when compared to the appropriate vehicle controls.

We then measured the titer from swabs of the different treatment groups to measure if there is a reduction in virus shedding. We found that all swabs were positive for the HSV-1. We found that hep-ATIII treatment did decrease the virus titer day AUC values from 36.8 to 29.5 although reduction was not significant (P = 0.09). ACV treatment reduced virus titer day AUC values to 17.2 (P < 0.01). Hep-ATIII treatment did not reduce the mean peak virus score AUC values. Thus, hep-ATIII treatment did not decrease virus shedding (Table V).

Table V.

Virus titers in swabs of heparin activated antithrombin III (hep-ATIII) treated SKH-1 Mice

Treatmenta #Virus
Positive/
Inoculated
Virus Titer-Day
AUC
P-Value
Mean Peak
Virus Score
(AUC)
P-Value
Vehicle
Carbopol gel 10/10 36.8 --- 6.6 ± 0.4 ---
Zovirax
5 % ACV 10/10 17.2 <0.01 5.2 ± 0.8 <0.05
Hep-ATIII
10 mg/ ml 10/10 29.5 0.09 5.8 ± 0.7 NSb
a.

Topical treatments with vehicle, ACV, and hep-ATIII were applied topically 3 times daily for 7 consecutive days in 6 hour intervals beginning 24 hours post viral inoculation.

b.

NS = Non-significant when compared to the appropriate vehicle controls.

IV. DISCUSSION

Nearly all currently available anti-HSV drugs finally target viral DNA polymerases. Furthermore, virus resistant to one drug often shows cross-resistance to other drugs [21]. In addition, nearly all current anti-HSV drugs show various kinds of side effects or poor bioavailability [22]. New treatment options are urgently needed.

We found that in vitro hep-ATIII was multiple-fold more effective than ACV. We also found that in vitro hep-ATIII was efficacious for ACV-resistant HSV. Therefore, our results indicated that hep-ATIII might be a possible second line treatment in immunocompromised patients due to AIDS, organ transplantation, or cancer chemotherapy. Long-term treatment in these immunocompromised hosts leads to the development of drug-resistant viruses [22]. ACV-resistant mutants were responsible for HSV pneumonia, progressive whitlow, meningoencephalitis, and mucocutaneous dissemination in AIDS patients [2327].

One strategy to prevent the occurrence of resistant viruses is to target immutable host cell factors necessary for entry, viral replication or maturation. ATIII was found to block HIV and HCV through a not completely understood intracellular mechanism, although the anti-inflammatory effect of ATIII seems to play a major role [7, 20]. Serpins were found also to block HIV-1 inhibition at the entry level, although to a lesser extent [28]. Surprisingly, we found that hep-ATIII was only inhibiting HSV-1 at an entry step. It is possible that the cell types used have not the receptor on their cell surface necessary for intracellular inhibition of ATIII.

Our strong in vitro efficacy was not transferred into in vivo studies. There might be several reasons for this result: (1.) Inhibition at entry level might have less efficacy because the virus has already infected the host cell in our in vivo system. (2.) The 60 kDa molecule might have difficulties to diffuse out of the gel polymer structure and to reach the target cells. Therefore, new delivery methods need to be tested to rule out this possibility. It might be necessary to couple the ATIII product with a small molecule antiviral agent to develop a combination product with multiple modalities of HSV-1 inhibition. This product might more effectively prevent virus transmission in both direct and indirect ways, will exhibit enhanced potency over the individual components of the combination product, and should be relatively insensitive to the selection of resistant virus strains.

V. CONCLUSION

Hep-ATIII belongs to a class of proteins termed serpins which have broad-spectrum antiviral activity. Our data show that hep-ATIII had a stronger inhibition capacity than ACV in vitro. Our results also indicate that inhibition was at the entry level and capable to inhibit ACV-resistant HSV-1. Combining hep-ATIII with ACV might be one possibility to block the virus at two steps in its life-cycle which might slow down the occurrence of resistant virus typical for ACV long-term treatment of immunocompromised patients. Our data also indicated that novel delivery techniques need to be employed to increase in vivo efficacy.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the United States National Institutes of Health (N01 Al30048, N01 Al30049, HHSN272201000027I).

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

We have no conflict of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Englund JA, Zimmerman ME, Swierkosz EM, Goodman JL, Scholl DR, Balfour HH., Jr Herpes simplex virus resistant to acyclovir. A study in a tertiary care center. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112(6):416–422. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-76-3-112-6-416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nugier F, Colin JN, Aymard M, Langlois M. Occurrence and characterization of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus isolates: report on a two-year sensitivity screening survey. J Med Virol. 1992;36(1):1–12. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890360102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Christophers J, Clayton J, Craske J, Ward R, Collins P, Trowbridge M, Darby G. Survey of resistance of herpes simplex virus to acyclovir in northwest England. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42(4):868–872. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.4.868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coen DM, Schaffer PA. Antiherpesvirus drugs: a promising spectrum of new drugs and drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2(4):278–288. doi: 10.1038/nrd1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Geiben-Lynn R, Brown N, Walker BD, Luster AD. Purification of a modified form of bovine antithrombin III as an HIV-1 CD8+ T-cell antiviral factor. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(44):42352–42357. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207079200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Geiben-Lynn R, Kursar M, Brown NV, Kerr EL, Luster AD, Walker BD. Noncytolytic inhibition of X4 virus by bulk CD8(+) cells from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected persons and HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes is not mediated by beta-chemokines. J Virol. 2001;75(17):8306–8316. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.17.8306-8316.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Whitney JB, Asmal M, Geiben-Lynn R. Serpin Induced Antiviral Activity of Prostaglandin Synthetase-2 against HIV-1 Replication. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goldsmith K, Chen W, Johnson DC, Hendricks RL. Infected cell protein (ICP)47 enhances herpes simplex virus neurovirulence by blocking the CD8+ T cell response. J Exp Med. 1998;187(3):341–348. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.3.341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stevens JG, Wagner EK, Devi-Rao GB, Cook ML, Feldman LT. RNA complementary to a herpesvirus alpha gene mRNA is prominent in latently infected neurons. Science. 1987;235(4792):1056–1059. doi: 10.1126/science.2434993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lafferty WE, Coombs RW, Benedetti J, Critchlow C, Corey L. Recurrences after oral and genital herpes simplex virus infection. Influence of site of infection and viral type. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(23):1444–1449. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198706043162304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Opal SM, Esmon CT. Bench-to-bedside review: functional relationships between coagulation and the innate immune response and their respective roles in the pathogenesis of sepsis. Crit Care. 2003;7(1):23–38. doi: 10.1186/cc1854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Orlans FB. Ethical decision making about animal experiments. Ethics Behav. 1997;7(2):163–171. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0702_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhu W, Chiu LC, Ooi VE, Chan PK, Ang PO., Jr Antiviral property and mechanisms of a sulphated polysaccharide from the brown alga Sargassum patens against Herpes simplex virus type 1. Phytomedicine. 2006;13(9–10):695–701. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2005.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wheeler CE. The effect of temperature upon the production of herpes simplex virus in tissue culture. J Immunol. 1958;81(2):98–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grau DR, Visalli RJ, Brandt CR. Herpes simplex virus stromal keratitis is not titer-dependent and does not correlate with neurovirulence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30(12):2474–2480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fowler SL, Forbes RA. Herpes simplex virus-1 replication in histiotypic rotation-mediated reaggregated murine brain. J Med Virol. 1995;45(4):405–409. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890450409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumar R, Rai D, Sharma SK, Saffran HA, Blush R, Tyrrell DL. Synthesis and antiviral activity of novel 5-(1-cyanamido-2-haloethyl) and 5-(1-hydroxy(or methoxy)-2-azidoethyl) analogues of uracil nucleosides. J Med Chem. 2001;44(21):3531–3538. doi: 10.1021/jm010226s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Levy JH, Weisinger A, Ziomek CA, Echelard Y. Recombinant antithrombin: production and role in cardiovascular disorder. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2001;27(4):405–416. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Elmaleh DR, Brown NV, Geiben-Lynn R. Anti-viral activity of human antithrombin III. Int J Mol Med. 2005;16(2):191–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Asmal M, Whitney JB, Luedemann C, Carville A, Steen R, Letvin NL, Geiben-Lynn R. In Vivo Anti-HIV Activity of the Heparin-Activated Serine Protease Inhibitor Antithrombin III Encapsulated in Lymph-Targeting Immunoliposomes. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Griffiths PD. A perspective on antiviral resistance. J Clin Virol. 2009;46(1):3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Superti F, Ammendolia MG, Marchetti M. New advances in anti-HSV chemotherapy. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15(9):900–911. doi: 10.2174/092986708783955419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chatis PA, Crumpacker CS. Resistance of herpesviruses to antiviral drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36(8):1589–1595. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.8.1589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kimberlin DW, Crumpacker CS, Straus SE, Biron KK, Drew WL, Hayden FG, McKinlay M, Richman DD, Whitley RJ. Antiviral resistance in clinical practice. Antiviral Res. 1995;26(4):423–438. doi: 10.1016/0166-3542(95)00031-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kimberlin DW, Coen DM, Biron KK, Cohen JI, Lamb RA, McKinlay M, Emini EA, Whitley RJ. Molecular mechanisms of antiviral resistance. Antiviral Res. 1995;26(4):369–401. doi: 10.1016/0166-3542(95)00027-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Krogsrud RL, Welchner E, Scouten E, Liuzzi M. A solid-phase assay for the binding of peptidic subunit association inhibitors to the herpes simplex virus ribonucleotide reductase large subunit. Anal Biochem. 1993;213(2):386–394. doi: 10.1006/abio.1993.1436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pottage JC, Jr, Kessler HA. Herpes simplex virus resistance to acyclovir: clinical relevance. Infect Agents Dis. 1995;4(3):115–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Munch J, Standker L, Adermann K, Schulz A, Schindler M, Chinnadurai R, Pohlmann S, Chaipan C, Biet T, Peters T, et al. Discovery and optimization of a natural HIV-1 entry inhibitor targeting the gp41 fusion peptide. Cell. 2007;129(2):263–275. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES