Skip to main content
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research logoLink to Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
. 2014 Aug 1;472(10):3121–3123. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3806-4

CORR Insights®: Knee Muscle Strength After Recent Partial Meniscectomy Does Not Relate to 2-year Change in Knee Adduction Moment

Jefferson C Brand 1,✉
PMCID: PMC4160477  PMID: 25082623

Where Are We Now?

This important paper by Hall and colleagues explores the potential relationship between the knee’s muscle strength and knee degenerative arthrosis after partial medial menisectomy. Knee adduction moment, as measured during gait analysis, is a surrogate for medial compartment loading and has been associated with both radiographic disease progression and knee pain. Peak knee adduction moment relates the peak force generated during walking and is velocity dependent. Impulse knee adduction moment is the average midstance value of the knee adduction moment. It is clear that knee adduction moment increases after partial medial meniscectomy [1, 3]. Cross-sectional evidence suggests that the knee adduction moment may be greater with weak knee extensors [3]. Despite this background, the authors were unable to find an improvement in peak or impulse knee adduction moment with increasing strength in patients 30 to 50 years of age postmenisectomy. The peak knee adduction moment increased 9% from the baseline assessment. Impulse knee adduction moment was unchanged from baseline.

Although this is important work, the current study had some important limitations. The authors did not present any outcomes data (such as pain scores), so we do not know the relationship of increasing knee adduction moment to knee pain after menisectomy. The power analysis was performed after data collection, therefore the study was not designed to have a large enough study population to detect a difference in the primary outcome of knee adduction moment. The amount of clinically important knee adduction moment is unknown. The muscles tested are primarily sagittal-plane functional, whereas knee adduction moment is more of a coronal-plane phenomenon. As the authors acknowledge, other muscles such as medial gastrocnemius may be more important to control knee adduction moment.

Where Do We Need To Go?

While there is an association between knee adduction moment and knee osteoarthritis after knee menisectomy, the role of knee adduction moment after partial medial menisectomy has yet to be determined. As always, diagnostic findings need to be carefully correlated with symptoms, specifically pain. As the authors note in their limitations, there may be more appropriate muscles to measure.

Similarly, the association between partial menisectomy and same compartment osteoarthritis is not completely understood. Is the relationship between altered joint contact forces causative? Could the menisectomy alter the proprioceptive capabilities? The small amount of knee laxity resulting from menisectomy may contribute to the degenerative changes [2]. Biochemical changes have been detected in joints with osteoarthritis. Does menisectomy contribute to the pathologic joint mileu? [5]. Perhaps this is simply natural history. Osteoarthritis is common in cadaver dissections, and meniscus tearing may be due to age-related joint changes.

The investigation explores a potentially modifiable variable in knee adduction moment. However, based on this investigation, knee flexor and extensor strengthening does not appear to be important in controlling knee adduction moment. While this investigation did not offer a modifiable solution to knee adduction moment after partial menisectomy, in the next section we hope to offer some opportunities to gain further insights into an important and vexing issue.

How Do We Get There?

In order to improve validated self-reported outcome measures, we must accurately discriminate between patients with differing outcomes that do not have the ceiling effect of some of the presently used measures. Investigators clarifying the relationship between menisectomy and same compartment osteoarthritis could use these tools. MRI, particularly delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage, may be useful in a longitudinal fashion to define the impact of the altered joint contact forces after menisectomy. Areas of cartilage loss or alteration can be compared to known areas of contact force concentration. As measurement of joint laxity improves, subtle laxity or abnormal joint motion may shear articular cartilage. Similarly, MRI would be of value for this application. Further synovial fluid research and cartilage biopsies will elucidate the biochemical impact of the menisectomy on the joint [5].

On a topic related to this investigation, Hall and colleagues, the same group that authored this investigation, have registered a Level I study proposing to compare physiotherapy with and without neuromuscular training as treatment for patients after menisectomy who are 30 to 50 years of age [4]. Neuromuscular training is a multiplane activity that may directly and notably impact knee adduction moment after partial menisectomy. Surface electromyography, commonly used in gait analysis, may target muscles for future intervention.

Osteoarthritis and its etiology are treated with a multimodal approach after partial menisectomy. Its relationship to knee adduction will need a multifaceted approach.

Footnotes

This CORR Insights ® is a commentary on the article “Knee Muscle Strength After Recent Partial Meniscectomy Does Not Relate to 2-year Change in Knee Adduction Moment” by Hall and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3737-0.

The author certifies that he, or any member of his immediate family, have no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR ® or the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.

This CORR Insights® comment refers to the article available at DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3737-0.

References

  • 1.Glaatthorn J, Berendts A, Bizzini M, Munzinger U, Maffiuletti N. Neuromuscular function after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1336–1343. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1172-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hall M, Hinman RS, Wrigley TV, Roos EM, Hodges PW, Staples M, Bennell KL. The effects of neuromuscular exercise on medial knee joint load post-arthroscopic partial medial menisectomy: SCOPEX, a randomized trial protocol. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2012;13:233. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Musumeci G, Trovato FM, Loreto C, Leonardi R, Szychlinska MA, Castorina S, Mobasheri A. Lubricin expression human osteoarthritic knee meniscus and synovial fluid: A morphological, immunohistochemical and biochemical study. [Published online ahead of print June 2, 2014]. Acta Histochem. DOI: 10.1016/j.acthis.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4.Sturnieks DL, Besier TF, Mills PM, Ackland TR, Maguire KF, Stachowiak GW, Podsiadlo P, Lloyd DG. Knee joint biomechanics following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1075–1080. doi: 10.1002/jor.20610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yammine K. Effect of partial menisectomy on anterior tibial translation in stable knees: a prospective controlled study on 32 patients. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2013;5:17. doi: 10.1186/2052-1847-5-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research are provided here courtesy of The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons

RESOURCES