Abstract
One of the emerging areas in microbiology is detecting specialized metabolites produced by microbial colonies and communities with mass spectrometry. In this review/perspective, we illustrate the emerging mass spectrometry methodologies that enable the interrogation of specialized metabolites directly from microbial colonies. Mass spectrometry techniques such as imaging mass spectrometry and real-time mass spectrometry allow two and three dimensional visualization of the distribution of metabolites, often with minimal sample pretreatment. The speed in which molecules are captured using these methods requires the development of new molecular visualization tools such as molecular networking. Together, these tools are beginning to provide unprecedented insight into the chemical world that microbes experience.
Introduction
Historically, advances in microbiology closely follow the development of technologies. The invention of microscope in early 1660s by Anton van Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) for example enabled the visualization of a hidden living world [1]. Similarly, modern techniques such as fluorescence microscopy revolutionized our understanding of membrane fluidity, calcium sensing, vesicle formation, distributions of proteins and many other important processes in microbiology [2-6]. Although mass spectrometry has been used to analyze microbiological samples for decades, it never gained a solid footing in the arsenal of routine tools used by microbiologists [7-19]. However, there is a resurgence in the adaptation of mass spectrometry towards the analysis of microbial samples due, in part, to the increased sensitivity, the increase in need to understand the mechanistic roles of microbial behavior at the chemical level, new instrumentation, ease of use of modern instruments and novel microbial and mass spectrometry compatible workflows that are being developed.
This year we are celebrating the 100-year anniversary of mass spectrometry. With the invention of cathode rays by Sir Joseph John Thomson (1856-1940), measuring the mass of atoms and molecules became possible [20]. Over the past few decades, as softer ionization methods have become available, entirely new ways were opened up to peek into the fascinating world of microbes. Liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has been used to understanding the intricate complexities of microbial metabolism, protein-protein interactions and post-translational modifications [21-32].
However, LC-MS is not the only way to investigate microbial systems. Direct analysis of microbes can be accomplished without a separation step. The ability to directly analyze microbial colonies has led to strain identification workflows that are now approved for clinical use. Furthermore, recent mass spectrometry advances enabled the mapping of microbial molecules spatially, the observation of molecules produced by living microbial colonies and of microbial molecules at the single cell level.
Clinical use of microbial mass spectrometry
In the 1970s, the lab of Catherine Fenselau published their pioneering research using mass spectrometry to identify cultured bacteria from patients' specimens. It was realized that direct mass spectrometry of microbes gives rise to fingerprint type signatures that can be correlated to a database of known species and a microbe's fingerprints as obtained with a mass spectrometer. These methods have now advanced to the clinic [33,34]. This pioneering work set the stage of the development of clinical microbiology identification tools such as Biotyper and VITEX-MS. The Bruker in vitro diagnostics (IVD) matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) Biotyper is a MALDI-time of flight (ToF)-mass spectrometry based platform for the identification of bacterial and yeast. Biotyper uses the unique molecular fingerprint such as the most abundant proteins, to identify the microbes [33,35,36]. The VITEK MS from bioMérieux is a similar platform as the Biotyper from Bruker [37]. The FDA clearance in 2013 for both of these microbial tests marks an exciting transition for clinical diagnostic mass spectrometry. It is likely that these and other mass spectrometry techniques will be widely introduced into clinic laboratories in a foreseeable future since they are faster, less labor intensive and cheaper than their counterparts to determine the phylogenetic branch that microorganisms belong to [38].
Direct analysis of microbial colonies in recent years has gone beyond microbial identification. Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) and real-time mass spectrometry are two new and exciting areas (Table 1). These developments are also leading to the development of new data visualization tools, such as molecular networking. Due to the volume of data that is generated, it has given rise to the need for a molecular Genbank to compare and contrast the data.
Table 1. Overview of novel mass spectrometry techniques used in microbiology.
|
|
SIMS, secondary ion imaging mass spectrometry; MALDI, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization; NanoDESI, nanospray desorption electrospray ionization; REIMS, rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry.
Microbial imaging mass spectrometry
In microbiology, phenotypic changes are often observed using optical or fluorescence microscopy. However, the chemical signals responsible for these changes are poorly characterized. The study of microbial metabolites production is hindered by the lack of tools that can connect the chemotypes with observed phenotypes. Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is able to provide two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) visualization of surface metabolites and lipids directly from microbial colonies.
While imaging mass spectrometry was demonstrated with secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) in the 1960s [39], the use of IMS in microbiology has only been carried out in the last decade [40]. We will not be comprehensive in this article but we will address some of the key advances and highlight their utility. In a typical imaging mass spectrometry experiment, the desorption and ionization of the molecules from the sample occurs when a desorption probe hits the surface of a sample at defined positions controlled by x-y stage, dislodging ions that are then “weighed” in a mass spectrometer (Figure 1).
Figure 1. MALDI imaging mass spectrometry workflow.
It results in a mass spectrum for each position - a graph where you have a mass-to-charge ratio on the x-axis and intensity on the y-axis. Eventually the collection of mass spectra at each position will be shown as a single image, with each specific mass displayed as a false-color gradient, showing the specific molecular distribution and relative abundance of the metabolites on sample. The ions for IMS can be generated with a variety of ion sources (Table 1). Here we highlight SIMS-IMS and MALDI-IMS. They have been used to image microbial systems, although imprinting techniques have enabled imaging mass spectrometry with other ion sources [41-44].
In SIMS, an analyte signal is produced from the sample surface by shooting a high-energy primary ion beam (e.g. gold, cesium clusters or bulky balls) and then producing secondary ions that will be guided into mass spectrometry detector through sputtering [45]. Although two main SIMS methods exist, we generalize both of them due to space limitation of this article. For a more thorough description of the methods see reference 37 and the references therein. SIMS is attractive for imaging because there is no need for extra matrix to increase ionization and can get an imaging spatial resolution of less than one micrometer. However, the requirement of ultra-high vacuum limits its throughput. Furthermore, the high-energy primary ion beam used to facilitate the ionization process limits the size of the molecules that can be detected [46]. Even in the gentlest SIMS method, most molecules that are detected are fragmented into fragment ions, charged atoms or atomic clusters. Due to the fragmented nature of the resulting ions, it is challenging to understand the origin of the signal detected, therefore creative use of isotopes and methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be adapted to gain insight into the spatial organization of microbial communities and their chemistries [47-51]. We anticipate that a solution to the high-energy beam will emerge in the next 20 years in the SIMS community to provide mostly intact molecular ions that would make SIMS results easier to interpret. Also, SIMS can be used for depth-profiling, in effect creating a 3D image [46] Some molecules however can be observed intact with SIMS [52-54]. It has been possible to study intact membrane lipids and proteins by ToF-SIMS at the single cell level [55,56] and the analysis of unlabeled molecular components in lipid monolayers [57,58]. It is for these reasons that SIMS IMS is being explored as a tool in microbiology as it is the highest spatial resolution IMS that currently exists [59-64].
Although SIMS has been around for much longer, MALDI imaging mass spectrometry, a method championed by the Caprioli lab, is the most widely used IMS technique at this time [65-74]. MALDI-IMS is applied in characterizing specialized metabolites from microbial monocultures or tracking the metabolite transfer within polymicrobial colonies and biofilms [25,75,76]. In MALDI, the sample is first covered with a layer of matrix. The matrix is a UV absorbing organic acid such as 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid or α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid. The matrix facilities the desorption and ionization of compounds from the sample surface. MALDI mass spectrometry has reported to desorb molecules with m/z up to 110kDa and higher [77]. In microbial imaging, the thickness of agar media is limited to 0.5-1.5 mm before applying matrix [76]. This is a physical limitation due to the insertion of the MALDI target plate into the instrument and there is not much space between the vacuum chamber and the MALDI plate during insertion. Emerging MALDI-IMS into studying specialized metabolites production is having a significant impact how microbes in culture are studied. For example, MALDI-IMS is a good tools to visualize the production of specialized metabolites as a result of interspecies interactions. For example, when Streptomyces coelicolor with other actinomyces resulted in the production of many specialized metabolites that were not produced when it was grown alone. Many of those specialized metabolites are interaction specific [74,78]. Another example is the direct visualization of metabolic biotransformation of metabolites between P.aeruginosa and A. fumigatus. A.fumigatus converted P.aeruginosa phenazine metabolites such as phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) into other phenazine compounds such as 1-hydroxyphenazine (1-HP) with enhanced toxicity in side-by-side interaction [25]. No only in interspecies interactions can we find new molecules even from well studies system IMS gives new molecular information. For example. MALDI-IMS was used to identify the Bacillus subtilis cannibalism factors [76]. MALDI-IMS is not limited to 2D. MALDI-IMS can define the chemistry that is found underneath microbial colonies. 3D microbial MALDI-IMS captures metabolic exchange factors but also capture chemical processes such as nutrient depletion and the alteration of the chemical environment on which the microbes grow [78,79]. With the most common MALDI and SIMS IMS instrument set-ups, however, the samples are under vacuum limiting real-time analysis.
Real-Time Mass Spectrometry
Another tool introduced in 2012 to directly analyze microbial colonies at the molecular level is real-time or live colony mass spectrometry [80]. Real-time mass spectrometry has a long history. As one of the most established real-time mass spectrometry techniques, membrane-introduction mass spectrometry (MIMS) was invented in the 1980s [82-84]. MIMS is used to detect liquid or gaseous samples by introducing ions into a mass spectrometer through semi-permeable membrane between the samples and the mass spectrometer. Aside from separating analytes from high and low-pressure environments of a mass spectrometer, the membrane is also provides as pre-concentration of to provide increased sensitivity. Another approach to real-time analysis is proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS), which is based on the use of chemical ionization (CI) [85-87] for the analysis of volatile compounds. Aside from monitoring bio-reactions, these methods have not yet been employed in studying the chemical make up of microbes. Only recently have ambient ionization methods been used to capture molecules from microbes in real-time. These ambient methods are nanospray desorption electrospray ionization (nanoDESI) [81,88-91], ambient electrospray ionization flow-probe [92-94] and rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) [95,96]. They all show great potential in direct analysis of living colonies, due to the minimal sample preparation required and to the broader range of sample types and agar surfaces that can be analyzed when compared with vacuum based methods.
NanoDESI is an ambient pressure ionization method that relies on liquid extraction and ionization. NanoDESI is designed for real-time analysis of molecules on substrates through the creation of a solvent bridge between the sample surface and two capillaries [88]. More importantly, nanoDESI is able to extract metabolites from the surface sample for mass spectrometric analysis without damaging the entire sample [80]. This allows the same colony to be sampled more than once using nanoDESI, gaining a time-lapse view of metabolites production and the roles of those metabolites in the colony. NanoDESI can be used to rapidly profile the metabolites from samples [97], assist in the characterization of specialized metabolites from microbial colonies [90] and to capture metabolites production involved in interspecies interactions [98]. However, nanoDESI has some drawbacks. Since nanoDESI is dependent upon a solvent bridge, complete recovery of the solvent utilized can be hindered due to the differences in hydrophobicity for some of the microbial colonies, leading to low overall signal intensity. NanoDESI imaging is possible. This has been demonstrated with tissues [99,100] and metabolic profiling of living bacterial colonies directly from Petri dish. Although possible, when aiming to perform imaging, the transfer capillary may clog as it moves along the surface due to surface relief of a microbial colony [91]. A possible solution of this limitation would be to develop an automated height sensor.
Similar to nanoDESI, an ambient electrospray ionization flow-probe technique is able to analyze living microbes from a Petri dish. The flow-probe technique shares the same advantages as nanoDESI including no sample preparation or purification. If desired, it can even provide a spatiotemporal profile of molecular signals directly from the surface of a colony. This flow-probe technique is based on the coaxial tube geometry liquid microjunction surface sampling probe (LMJ-SSP). The major difference of LMJ-SSP from nanoDESI is using pneumatic nebulizer instead of two nanospray capillaries. The flow-probe reduces the difficulty of removing clogs by allowing the nebulizer valve to be temporarily blocked so the nebulizer gas could flush the transfer tube [92].
Finally, another creative real-time technique is called rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS). This method was reported as we were writing this article. REIMS is designed specifically for real-time, in vivo analysis of biological tissues in the surgical environment [96]. REIMS could detect mass spectral fingerprints of microbes from intact bacterial cells upon subjecting the bacterial biomass to a radiofrequency (RF) electrical current [95]. Since the REIMS profile of intact bacteria can be obtained in 2-3 seconds without any sample preparation, and combined with multi-variable analysis, REIMS also has the potential to be used as a bacterial identification strategy similar to the Biotyper and VITEX-MS platforms. Further development would be using REIMS to detect bacteria directly from human biofluids or tissue matrices, although it likely requires the specific understanding of the chemistry that belongs to specific microbes and a way to visualize it. Standard multivariable analysis probably would not work in such biofluid unless the majority of the biofluid composition is one or two microbes.
Real-time mass spectrometry techniques, as described above, can sample a living microbial community. More importantly, since real-time mass spectrometry enables rapid profiling under ambient conditions, it can be used in high-throughput screens of biological and clinical samples, be used for species classification and for the analysis of specialized metabolites (e.g. virulence factors, quorum sensors, antibiotics, etc). However enabling high throughput and information rich data acquisition also means that new methods for visualizing the data must be developed, something that is in its infancy right now.
Molecular Networking
One of the largest challenges with microbial analysis of live colonies using ambient ionization methods is that the data acquisition is easy and fast. This means lots of data is generated and new informatics methods to visualize this data needs to be developed. Akin to the need for a revolution in sequencing informatics 20 years ago a similar revolution is needed in the analysis of mass spectrometry data. It is expected that the next 10 years we will see a significant advancements in the data analysis tools of mass spectrometry information. One such method is molecular networking, a powerful MS based data analysis tool that enables the detection and visualization of related compounds via MS/MS fragmentation spectra relationships within a dataset, as well as analysis individual MS/MS signals by creating a chemical diversity map of detected molecules without the need to know the structure [80]. Currently, the chemistry of most virulence factors, and other specialized metabolites from microbes are studied by monitoring individual molecular species, which requires a significant amount of time to understand and interpret the information. Unlike traditional metabolomics, specialized metabolites are not common to every microbe and therefore one standard workflow may not work. The MS/MS based molecular networking is a powerful strategy to guide the molecular characterization based on the MS/MS fragmentation patterns of molecules that are detected as ions [80,101,102] (Figure 2). Molecular networking is able to visualize related compounds based on the similarities of MS/MS spectra and enables a more global analysis of the microbial metabolites, perhaps an apt comparison is metagenomic analysis. The repertoire of specialized metabolites is more complex that originally thought and changes significantly when a bacterium is in contact with other organisms [25,78]. It is expected that MS/MS based molecular networking will also provide a view of the composition of many uncharacterized microbial factors [103-105].
Figure 2.
Generation and visualization of molecular network. A) Workflow of generation of molecular networking. The cosine score of MS spectra alignment between 0 to 1 as well as the thickness of edges in network represent the similarity of certain spectra. Score in 1 or thick edge means high spectral similarity. Certain cut-off of cosine score (normally 0.5) usually applied. B) Cytoscape visualization of molecular networking. The number labeled on each node represent the parent mass. Different colors represent different samples that data generated from. C) Compound identification via molecular networking. Different colors represent different mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). [102]
In conclusion, these advanced mass spectrometry techniques are capable of direct analysis of microbial communities with little or no sample preparation, even from live samples. Methods such as imaging mass spectrometry and real-time mass spectrometry are simplifying the otherwise time-consuming and labor-intensive sample preparation processes. They provide an avenue to widely apply mass spectrometry techniques towards clinical and biotechnological studies and take inventory of the diversity of specialize metabolites produced by microbes. Combined with novel informatics approaches, the application of these mass spectrometry methods to microbiology are an exciting development that will impact how microbes are characterized in the future at the molecular level.
Highlights.
Mass spectrometry techniques are powerful tools in studying specialized metabolites production from microbial colonies.
Direct analysis of microbial colonies can be used for clinical strain identification.
Microbial imaging mass spectrometry is able to visualize surface and secreted metabolites from microbial colonies.
Real-time mass spectrometry techniques enable the direct mass spectrometric interrogation of living microbial colonies.
Tandem mass spectrometry based molecular networking and emerging algorithms enable global molecular analysis of microbial metabolites.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Vanessa Phelan (UCSD) for comments and editing on the review, and Dr. Wei-Ting Liu (Stanford University) for providing the original molecular networking data in figure 2C. Dorrestein lab is funded by National Institution of Health (NIH) Grants GM094802, GM094802, AI095125, GM097509 and S10RR029121.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
* of special interest
** of outstanding interest
- 1.Lariviere J. Van Leeuwenhoek-father of microbiology. Vol. 6. UNESCO; 1977. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Doddema H, Vogels G. Improved identification of methanogenic bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1978;36:752–754. doi: 10.1128/aem.36.5.752-754.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gatfield J, Pieters J. Essential role for cholesterol in entry of mycobacteria into macrophages. Science. 2000;288:1647–1651. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5471.1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Berkova Z, Morris AP, Estes MK. Cytoplasmic calcium measurement in rotavirus enterotoxin-enhanced green fluorescent protein (NSP4-EGFP) expressing cells loaded with Fura-2. Cell calcium. 2003;34:55–68. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4160(03)00022-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Egger D, Teterina N, Ehrenfeld E, Bienz K. Formation of the poliovirus replication complex requires coupled viral translation, vesicle production, and viral RNA synthesis. Journal of virology. 2000;74:6570–6580. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.14.6570-6580.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takizawa PA, Sil A, Swedlow JR, Herskowitz I, Vale RD. Actin-dependent localization of an RNA encoding a cell-fate determinant in yeast. Nature. 1997;389:90–93. doi: 10.1038/38015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Anhalt JP, Fenselau C. Identification of Bacteria Using Mass-Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 1975;47:219–225. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hathout Y, Demirev PA, Ho YP, Bundy JL, Ryzhov V, Sapp L, Stutler J, Jackman J, Fenselau C. Identification of Bacillus spores by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1999;65:4313–4319. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.10.4313-4319.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Demirev PA, Ho YP, Ryzhov V, Fenselau C. Microorganism identification by mass spectrometry and protein database searches. Analytical Chemistry. 1999;71:2732–2738. doi: 10.1021/ac990165u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Holland RD, Wilkes JG, Rafii F, Sutherland JB, Persons CC, Voorhees KJ, Lay JO. Rapid identification of intact whole bacteria based on spectral patterns using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 1996;10:1227–1232. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19960731)10:10<1227::AID-RCM659>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Holland RD, Duffy CR, Rafii F, Sutherland JB, Heinze TM, Holder CL, Voorhees KJ, Lay JO. Identification of bacterial proteins observed in MALDI TOF mass spectra from whole cells. Analytical Chemistry. 1999;71:3226–3230. doi: 10.1021/ac990175v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lay JO. Maldi-Tof Mass Spectrometry of Bacteria. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 2001;20:172–194. doi: 10.1002/mas.10003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pineda FJ, Lin JS, Fenselau C, Demirev PA. Testing the significance of microorganism identification by mass spectrometry and proteome database search. Analytical Chemistry. 2000;72:3739–3744. doi: 10.1021/ac000130q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hsieh SY, Tseng CL, Lee YS, Kuo AJ, Sun CF, Lin YH, Chen JK. Highly efficient classification and identification of human pathogenic bacteria by MALDI-TOF MS. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2008;7:448–456. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700339-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jones JJ, Stump MJ, Fleming RC, Lay JO, Wilkins CL. Investigation of MALDI- TOF and FT-MS Techniques for Analysis of Escherichia c oli Whole Cells. Analytical Chemistry. 2003;75:1340–1347. doi: 10.1021/ac026213j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ruelle V, Moualij BE, Zorzi W, Ledent P, Pauw ED. Rapid identification of environmental bacterial strains by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2004;18:2013–2019. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fox A. Mass spectrometry for species or strain identification after culture or without culture: past, present, and future. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2006;44:2677–2680. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00971-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dworzanski JP, Snyder AP. Classification and identification of bacteria using mass spectrometry-based proteomics. 2005 doi: 10.1586/14789450.2.6.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lasch P, Nattermann H, Erhard M, Stämmler M, Grunow R, Bannert N, Appel B, Naumann D. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry compatible inactivation method for highly pathogenic microbial cells and spores. Analytical Chemistry. 2008;80:2026–2034. doi: 10.1021/ac701822j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Watson JT, S O. Introduction to mass spectrometry instrumentation, appliations, and strategies for data interpretation. Wiley; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jensen ON. Modification-specific proteomics: characterization of post- translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Current opinion in chemical biology. 2004;8:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2003.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Butland G, Peregrín-Alvarez JM, Li J, Yang W, Yang X, Canadien V, Starostine A, Richards D, Beattie B, Krogan N. Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature. 2005;433:531–537. doi: 10.1038/nature03239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mashego MR, Rumbold K, De Mey M, Vandamme E, Soetaert W, Heijnen JJ. Microbial metabolomics: past, present and future methodologies. Biotechnology letters. 2007;29:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s10529-006-9218-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang J, Sprung R, Pei J, Tan X, Kim S, Zhu H, Liu CF, Grishin NV, Zhao Y. Lysine acetylation is a highly abundant and evolutionarily conserved modification in Escherichia coli. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2009;8:215–225. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800187-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25**.Moree WJ, Phelan VV, Wu CH, Bandeira N, Cornett DS, Duggan BM, Dorrestein PC. Interkingdom metabolic transformations captured by microbial imaging mass spectrometry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:13811–13816. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206855109. This paper describes using microbial MALDI-ToF-imaging mass spectrometry detecting metabolic exchange between cystic fibrosis related pathogens Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aspergillus fumigatus on agar colony. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Picotti P, Clement-Ziza M, Lam H, Campbell DS, Schmidt A, Deutsch EW, Rost H, Sun Z, Rinner O, Reiter L, et al. A complete mass-spectrometric map of the yeast proteome applied to quantitative trait analysis. Nature. 2013;494:266–270. doi: 10.1038/nature11835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wessel AK, Hmelo L, Parsek MR, Whiteley M. Going local: technologies for exploring bacterial microenvironments. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2013;11:337–348. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang X, Huang Y, Harvey PR, Li H, Ren Y, Li J, Wang J, Yang H. Isolation and Characterization of Carbendazim-degrading Rhodococcus erythropolis djl-11. Plos One. 2013;8:e74810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.He J, Han S, Yang F, Zhou N, Wang S. Prostate Cell Membrane Chromatography-Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for Screening of Active Constituents from Uncaria rhynchophylla. Journal of Chromatographic Science. 2012 doi: 10.1093/chromsci/bms188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Galbis-Martínez M, Padmanabhan S, Murillo FJ, Elías-Arnanz M. CarF mediates signaling by singlet oxygen, generated via photoexcited protoporphyrin IX, in Myxococcus xanthus light-induced carotenogenesis. Journal of bacteriology. 2012;194:1427–1436. doi: 10.1128/JB.06662-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kumar SN, Nambisan B, Sundaresan A, Mohandas C, Anto RJ. Isolation and identification of antimicrobial secondary metabolites from Bacillus cereus associated with a rhabditid entomopathogenic nematode. Annals of Microbiology. 2013:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu R, Haas W, Dephoure N, Huttlin EL, Zhai B, Sowa ME, Gygi SP. A large-scale method to measure absolute protein phosphorylation stoichiometries. Nature Methods. 2011;8:677–683. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Marko DC, Saffert RT, Cunningham SA, Hyman J, Walsh J, Arbefeville S, Howard W, Pruessner J, Safwat N, Cockerill FR, et al. Evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems for identification of nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli isolated from cultures from cystic fibrosis patients. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2012;50:2034–2039. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00330-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rashed MS. Clinical applications of tandem mass spectrometry: ten years of diagnosis and screening for inherited metabolic diseases. Journal of chromatography B, Biomedical sciences and applications. 2001;758:27–48. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(01)00100-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.van Belkum A, Welker M, Erhard M, Chatellier S. Biomedical mass spectrometry in today's and tomorrow's clinical microbiology laboratories. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2012;50:1513–1517. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00420-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nori P, Ostrowsky B, Dorokhova O, Gialanella P, Moy M, Muggia V, Grossberg R, Kornblum J, Lin Y, Levi MH. Use of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry To Resolve Complex Clinical Cases of Patients with Recurrent Bacteremias. Journal of clinical microbiology. 2013;51:1983–1986. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00083-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rohn J. First mass spectrometry diagnostic approved in US. Nature biotechnology. 2013;31:862–862. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fournier PE, Drancourt M, Colson P, Rolain JM, La Scola B, Raoult D. Modern clinical microbiology: new challenges and solutions. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2013;11:574–585. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Castaing R, Slodzian G. Microanalysis by secondary ionic emission. J Microsc. 1962;1:395–410. [Google Scholar]
- 40**.Watrous JD, Dorrestein PC. Imaging mass spectrometry in microbiology. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2011;9:683–694. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2634. This article reviews various imaging mass spectrometry techniques used in microbiology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kindness A, Sekaran CN, Feldmann Two-dimensional mapping of copper and zinc in liver sections by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:1916–1923. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.022046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Akhmetov A, Moore JF, Gasper GL, Koin PJ, Hanley L. Laser desorption postionization for imaging MS of biological material. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2010;45:137–145. doi: 10.1002/jms.1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gasper GL, Takahashi LK, Zhou J, Ahmed M, Moore JF, Hanley L. Laser desorption postionization mass spectrometry of antibiotic-treated bacterial biofilms using tunable vacuum ultraviolet radiation. Analytical Chemistry. 2010;82:7472–7478. doi: 10.1021/ac101667q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kaur-Atwal G, Weston DJ, Green PS, Crosland S, Bonner PLR, Creaser CS. Analysis of tryptic peptides using desorption electrospray ionisation combined with ion mobility spectrometry/mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2007;21:1131–1138. doi: 10.1002/rcm.2941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Heeren RMA, McDonnell LA, Amstalden E, Luxembourg SL, Altelaar AFM, Piersma SR. Why don't biologists use SIMS? A critical evaluation of imaging MS. Applied Surface Science. 2006;252:6827–6835. [Google Scholar]
- 46*.Armitage EG, Kotze HL, Lockyer NP. Imaging of metabolites using secondary ion mass spectrometry. Metabolomics. 2013;9:102–109. This article reports the benefits using ToF-SIMS imaging mass spectrometry to achieve metabolomics analysis on biological tissues and cells. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Musat N, Halm H, Winterholler Br, Hoppe P, Peduzzi S, Hillion F, Horreard F, Amann R, Jørgensen BB, Kuypers MM. A single-cell view on the ecophysiology of anaerobic phototrophic bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105:17861–17866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809329105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li T, Wu TD, Mazéas L, Toffin L, Guerquin-Kern J, Leblon Gr, Bouchez To. Simultaneous analysis of microbial identity and function using NanoSIMS. Environmental microbiology. 2008;10:580–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01478.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fike DA, Gammon CL, Ziebis W, Orphan VJ. Micron-scale mapping of sulfur cycling across the oxycline of a cyanobacterial mat: a paired nanoSIMS and CARD-FISH approach. The ISME journal. 2008;2:749–759. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Behrens S, Lösekann T, Pett-Ridge J, Weber PK, Ng WO, Stevenson BS, Hutcheon ID, Relman DA, Spormann AM. Linking microbial phylogeny to metabolic activity at the single-cell level by using enhanced element labeling-catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (EL-FISH) and NanoSIMS. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2008;74:3143–3150. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00191-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Burow LC, Woebken D, Marshall IP, Lindquist EA, Bebout BM, Prufert-Bebout L, Hoehler TM, Tringe SG, Pett-Ridge J, Weber PK. Anoxic carbon flux in photosynthetic microbial mats as revealed by metatranscriptomics. The ISME journal. 2012;7:817–829. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Davies N, Weibel DE, Blenkinsopp P, Lockyer N, Hill R, Vickerman JC. Development and experimental application of a gold liquid metal ion source. Applied Surface Science. 2003;203:223–227. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Touboul D, Kollmer F, Niehuis E, Brunelle A, Laprévote O. Improvement of biological time-of-flight-secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging with a bismuth cluster ion source. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2005;16:1608–1618. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Smith DF, Robinson EW, Tolmachev AV, Heeren RM, Paśa-Tolić L. C60 secondary ion Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 2011;83:9552–9556. doi: 10.1021/ac2023348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rubakhin SS, Romanova EV, Nemes P, Sweedler JV. Profiling metabolites and peptides in single cells. Nature Methods. 2011;8:S20–S29. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Boxer SG, Kraft ML, Weber PK. Advances in Imaging Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry for Biological Samples. Annual Review of Biophysics. 2009;38:53–74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.050708.133634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ostrowski SG, Kurczy ME, Roddy TP, Winograd N, Ewing AG. Secondary ion MS imaging to relatively quantify cholesterol in the membranes of individual cells from differentially treated populations. Analytical Chemistry. 2007;79:3554–3560. doi: 10.1021/ac061825f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Johansson B. ToF-SIMS imaging of lipids in cell membranes. Surface and Interface Analysis. 2006;38:1401–1412. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wagner M. Single-Cell Ecophysiology of Microbes as Revealed by Raman Microspectroscopy or Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2009;63:411–429. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dekas AE, Poretsky RS, Orphan VJ. Deep-sea archaea fix and share nitrogen in methane-consuming microbial consortia. Science. 2009;326:422–426. doi: 10.1126/science.1178223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chandra S, Pumphrey G, Abraham JM, Madsen EL. Dynamic SIMS ion microscopy imaging of individual bacterial cells for studies of isotopically labeled molecules. Applied Surface Science. 2008;255:847–851. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Cliff JB, Gaspar DJ, Bottomley PJ, Myrold DD. Exploration of inorganic C and N assimilation by soil microbes with time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002;68:4067–4073. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.4067-4073.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lechene CP, Luyten Y, McMahon G, Distel DL. Quantitative imaging of nitrogen fixation by individual bacteria within animal cells. Science. 2007;317:1563–1566. doi: 10.1126/science.1145557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Clode PL, Kilburn MR, Jones DL, Stockdale EA, Cliff JB, Herrmann AM, Murphy DV. In situ mapping of nutrient uptake in the rhizosphere using nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry. Plant Physiology. 2009;151:1751–1757. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.141499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chaurand P, Schwartz SA, Caprioli RM. Imaging mass spectrometry: a new tool to investigate the spatial organization of peptides and proteins in mammalian tissue sections. Current opinion in chemical biology. 2002;6:676–681. doi: 10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00370-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Cornett DS, Reyzer ML, Chaurand P, Caprioli RM. MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: molecular snapshots of biochemical systems. Nature Methods. 2007;4:828–833. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.McDonnell LA, Heeren R. Imaging mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 2007;26:606–643. doi: 10.1002/mas.20124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kriegsmann M, Seeley EH, Schwarting A, Kriegsmann J, Otto M, Thabe H, Dierkes B, Biehl C, Sack U, Wellmann A. MALDI MS imaging as a powerful tool for investigating synovial tissue. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. 2012;41:305–309. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2011.647925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Grove KJ, Frappier SL, Caprioli RM. Matrix pre-coated MALDI MS targets for small molecule imaging in tissues. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2011;22:192–195. doi: 10.1007/s13361-010-0013-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Balluff B, Schöne C, Höfler H, Walch A. MALDI imaging mass spectrometry for direct tissue analysis: technological advancements and recent applications. Histochemistry and cell biology. 2011;136:227–244. doi: 10.1007/s00418-011-0843-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Angel PM, Caprioli RM. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization imaging mass spectrometry: in situ molecular mapping. Biochemistry. 2013;52:3818–3828. doi: 10.1021/bi301519p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zavalin A, Todd EM, Rawhouser PD, Yang J, Norris JL, Caprioli RM. Direct imaging of single cells and tissue at sub-cellular spatial resolution using transmission geometry MALDI MS. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 2012;47:1473–1481. doi: 10.1002/jms.3108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Spraggins JM, Caprioli RM. High-speed MALDI-TOF imaging mass spectrometry: rapid ion image acquisition and considerations for next generation instrumentation. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2011;22:1022–1031. doi: 10.1007/s13361-011-0121-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hopwood DA. Imaging Mass Spectrometry Reveals Highly Specific Interactions between Actinomycetes To Activate Specialized Metabolic Gene Clusters. mBio. 2013;4:e00612–00613. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00612-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75**.Yang YL, Xu Y, Straight P, Dorrestein PC. Translating metabolic exchange with imaging mass spectrometry. Nature chemical biology. 2009;5:885–887. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.252. This article is the first paper of applied MALDI based imaging mass spectrometry in capturing metabolic exchange in bacteria. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Liu WT, Yang YL, Xu Y, Lamsa A, Haste NM, Yang JY, Ng J, Gonzalez D, Ellermeier CD, Straight PD, et al. Imaging mass spectrometry of intraspecies metabolic exchange revealed the cannibalistic factors of Bacillus subtilis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:16286–16290. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008368107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Van Remoortere A, Van Zeijl RJM, Van den Oever N, Franck J, Longuespée Rm, Wisztorski M, Salzet M, Deelder AM, Fournier I, McDonnell LA. MALDI imaging and profiling MS of higher mass proteins from tissue. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2010;21:1922–1929. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2010.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Traxler MF, Watrous JD, Alexandrov T, Dorrestein PC, Kolter R. Interspecies interactions stimulate diversification of the Streptomyces coelicolor secreted metabolome. mBio. 2013;4:e00459–00413. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00459-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Seeley EH, Caprioli RM. 3D imaging by mass spectrometry: a new frontier. Analytical Chemistry. 2012;84:2105–2110. doi: 10.1021/ac2032707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80**.Watrous J, Roach P, Alexandrov T, Heath BS, Yang JY, Kersten RD, van der Voort M, Pogliano K, Gross H, Raaijmakers JM, et al. Mass spectral molecular networking of living microbial colonies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:E1743–1752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203689109. This article describes real-time direct mass spectrometry nanoDESI combined with a powerful mass spectrometry data analysis tool molecular networking to monitor metabolites production from living microbial colonies from various bacterial genera. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Takats Z, Wiseman JM, Gologan B, Cooks RG. Mass spectrometry sampling under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization. Science. 2004;306:471–473. doi: 10.1126/science.1104404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kotiaho T, Lauritsen FR, Choudhury TK, Cooks RG, Tsao GT. Membrane introduction mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 1991;63:875A–883A. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Johnson R, Cooks R, Allen T, Cisper M, Hemberger P. Membrane introduction mass spectrometry: trends and applications. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 2000;19:1–37. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2787(2000)19:1<1::AID-MAS1>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bauer S. Membrane introduction mass spectrometry; an old method that is gaining new interest through recent technological advances. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 1995;14:202–213. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Steeghs M, Bais HP, de Gouw J, Goldan P, Kuster W, Northway M, Fall R, Vivanco JM. Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry as a new tool for real time analysis of root-secreted volatile organic compounds in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2004;135:47–58. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.038703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Blake RS, Monks PS, Ellis AM. Proton-transfer reaction mass spectrometry. Chemical reviews. 2009;109:861–896. doi: 10.1021/cr800364q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.de Gouw J, Warneke C. Measurements of volatile organic compounds in the earth's atmosphere using proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 2007;26:223–257. doi: 10.1002/mas.20119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Roach PJ, Laskin J, Laskin A. Nanospray desorption electrospray ionization: an ambient method for liquid-extraction surface sampling in mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2010;135:2233–2236. doi: 10.1039/c0an00312c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Rath CM, Yang JY, Alexandrov T, Dorrestein PC. Data-Independent Microbial Metabolomics with Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2013:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s13361-013-0608-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Traxler MF, Kolter R. A massively spectacular view of the chemical lives of microbes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:10128–10129. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207725109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91**.Watrous J, Roach P, Heath B, Alexandrov T, Laskin J, Dorrestein PC. Metabolic profiling directly from the petri dish using nanospray desorption electrospray ionization imaging mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 2013;85:10385–10391. doi: 10.1021/ac4023154. Work described in this paper is a novel methodology combining applying MALDI-ToF imaging mass spectrometry on serious of cross-section of deep agar colony and a 3D model created from MATLAB to visualize deep-in-agar metabolic exchange between Bacillus subtilis and Streptomyces coelicolor, as well as, Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92**.Hsu CC, ElNaggar MS, Peng Y, Fang J, Sanchez LM, Mascuch SJ, Moller KA, Alazzeh EK, Pikula J, Quinn RA, et al. Real-time metabolomics on living microorganisms using ambient electrospray ionization flow-probe. Analytical Chemistry. 2013;85:7014–7018. doi: 10.1021/ac401613x. This article describes using ESI-flow probe mass spectrometry to directly analysis living microbial colonies on Petri dish on various microorganism species. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kertesz V, Van Berkel GJ. Liquid Microjunction Surface Sampling Coupled with High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry for Analysis of Drugs and Metabolites in Whole-Body Thin Tissue Sections. Analytical Chemistry. 2010;82:5917–5921. doi: 10.1021/ac100954p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Van Berkel GJ, Sanchez AD, Quirke JME. Thin-layer chromatography and electrospray mass spectrometry coupled using a surface sampling probe. Analytical Chemistry. 2002;74:6216–6223. doi: 10.1021/ac020540+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95**.Strittmatter N, Jones EA, Veselkov KA, Rebec M, Bundy JG, Takats Z. Analysis of Intact Bacteria Using Rapid Evaporative Ionisation Mass Spectrometry. Chem Commun. 2013 doi: 10.1039/c3cc42015a. The recently published article describes using rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry to correctly identify nine bacterial species cultured on various growth media based on their mass spectral fingerprints. This is a powerful approach when combined with multiple statistical analysis of the resulting data to begin identifying microbes. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Schäfer KC, Dénes Jl, Albrecht K, Szaniszlo T, Balog J, Skoumal Rk, Katona M, Tóth Ms, Balogh L, Takáts Zn. In vivo, in situ tissue analysis using rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2009;48:8240–8242. doi: 10.1002/anie.200902546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Hartmanova L, Ranc V, Papouskova B, Bednar P, Havlicek V, Lemr K. Fast profiling of anthocyanins in wine by desorption nano-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Journal of chromatography A. 2010;1217:4223–4228. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Traxler MF, Watrous JD, Alexandrov T, Dorrestein PC, Kolter R. Interspecies interactions stimulate diversification of the Streptomyces coelicolor secreted metabolome. mBio. 2013;4 doi: 10.1128/mBio.00459-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Laskin J, Heath BS, Roach PJ, Cazares L, Semmes OJ. Tissue imaging using nanospray desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 2011;84:141–148. doi: 10.1021/ac2021322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lanekoff I, Burnum-Johnson K, Thomas M, Short J, Carson JP, Cha J, Dey SK, Yang P, Prieto Conaway MC, Laskin J. High-Speed Tandem Mass Spectrometric in Situ Imaging by Nanospray Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry. 2013;85:9596–9603. doi: 10.1021/ac401760s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Bandeira N. Protein identification by spectral networks analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;694:151–168. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-977-2_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Liu WT, Lamsa A, Wong WR, Boudreau PD, Kersten R, Peng Y, Moree WJ, Duggan BM, Moore BS, Gerwick WH. MS/MS-based networking and peptidogenomics guided genome mining revealed the stenothricin gene cluster in Streptomyces roseosporus. The Journal of antibiotics. 2013 doi: 10.1038/ja.2013.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103**.Nguyen DD, Wu CH, Moree WJ, Lamsa A, Medema MH, Zhao X, Gavilan RG, Aparicio M, Atencio L, Jackson C, et al. MS/MS networking guided analysis of molecule and gene cluster families. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:E2611–2620. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303471110. Work described in this paper is using MS/MS molecular networking as a tool to map more than 60 microoragnisms, most of which are unsequenced, and locate their nonribosomal peptide molecular families based on the similarity of their mass spectral fragmentation patterns. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Moree WJ, Yang JY, Zhao X, Liu WT, Aparicio M, Atencio L, Ballesteros J, Sanchez J, Gavilan RG, Gutierrez M, et al. Imaging mass spectrometry of a coral microbe interaction with fungi. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2013;39:1045–1054. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0320-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105**.Yang JY, Sanchez LM, Rath CM, Liu X, Boudreau PD, Bruns N, Glukhov E, Wodtke A, de Felicio R, Fenner A. Molecular Networking as a Dereplication Strategy. Journal of natural products. 2013;76:1686–1699. doi: 10.1021/np400413s. This article illustrates mass spectrometry-based molecular networking as a powerful natural products dereplication tool by organizing MS/MS data based on mass spectral fragmentation similarities of unknown molecules, known standards, synthetic molecules and well-characterized organisms. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


