Abstract
A diphtheria toxin shown to have high toxicity and avidity and to combine with antitoxin in multiple proportions was selected for the U.S. standard diphtheria toxin for the Schick test and freeze-dried. Assayed values per vial were 1.09 Lf, 1.09 Lr, 1,090 Schick test doses (STD), 33 LD80, 38 LD50, and 43,000 minimum skin reactive doses. One STD (Lr/1000) is slightly more toxic than one unit of the international standard (Lf/1,000). Experiments showed that the potency assay of Schick test toxin by guinea pig erythema toxicity, determined relative to the toxicity of the standard, was highly reproducible and significantly more reproducible than the lethal (minimum lethal dose) test and that the STD, defined as one Lr/1000, was equivalent to approximately 1/50 minimum lethal dose. The erythema potency assay was prescribed in the U.S. standards for Schick test toxin effective in 1969.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da7f2/da7f2eab1df284393a99a252ac0697d967e06750" alt="295"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/954f3/954f32a5af00a7b43edd85b26813703a20ad309e" alt="296"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80953/80953267b69996e0696a2869769cb0a29cf9caf7" alt="297"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b421/1b4216b51e396dfd9cc4849f01090e7457b3794f" alt="298"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4601/d4601d152983862d9ec561ab5b788a71345a1bae" alt="299"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1fde/a1fdec008d0818f22ff8f57b7ed8344e63a3a2fa" alt="300"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1f40/b1f4066f4c9034779df5b0fd8382b86a4aafadc7" alt="301"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea6e8/ea6e8a55566ee2b50ae1f9ca82843b1c2514d139" alt="302"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77d50/77d5061f879aa9bec7ff68cc1e985d63e3fe6c6f" alt="303"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25f99/25f9958e104bbbf83b7ee7f6f1c47dcce8b8ce68" alt="304"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a398/0a398a86c1ddfe18ec2fd7c82a69c32fbb61ecca" alt="305"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abd70/abd7061b1bcc12b2f62ffd876a52eabcb87ce2e0" alt="306"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BRANHAM S. E., WORMALD M. F. The use of the chick in titration of diphtheria antitoxin. J Immunol. 1954 Jun;72(6):478–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GERWING J., LONG D. A., MUSSETT M. V. The assay of diphtheria toxin. Bull World Health Organ. 1957;17(4-5):537–551. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JERNE N. K. A study of avidity based on rabbit skin responses to diphtheria toxin-antitoxin mixtures. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Suppl. 1951;87:1–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KOLB R. W., BRANHAM S. E., RIGGS D. B. Comparison of the guinea pig and chick in evaluation of diphtheria toxin for the Schick test. Appl Microbiol. 1955 Jul;3(4):242–247. doi: 10.1128/am.3.4.242-247.1955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MILES A. A. Biological standards and the measurement of therapeutic activity. Br Med Bull. 1951;7(4):283–291. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a073920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SEIBERT F. B., DUFOUR E. H. Comparison between the international standard tuberculins, PPD-S and old tuberculin. Am Rev Tuberc. 1954 Apr;69(4):585–594. doi: 10.1164/art.1954.69.4.585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]