Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Retina. 2012 Mar;32(3):600–605. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318221592f

Table 1.

Comparison of film vs. digital grading for variables of distance and area of CMV retinitis (N=48)

Variables N* Digital
images
Mean(SD)
Film
images
Mean
(SD)
Mean
absolute
difference
(95% CI)
Mean
Difference
(95% CI)
p
value
Distance to Disc (DD) 14 2.89 (2.52) 2.87 (2.62) 0.16 (0.08, 0.25) 0.02 (−0.11, 0.15) 0.29
Distance to macula (DD) 14 3.70 (2.51) 3.74 (2.68) 0.17 (0.04, 0.30) −0.04 (−0.21, 0.12) 0.98
Area of CMV retinitis (DA) 15 44.08 (26.34) 43.13 (26.04) 1.77 (0.85, 2.68) 0.95 (−0.30, 2.20) 0.13
*

Includes images with gradable CMV retinitis only.

DD-disc diameter, DA- disc area, p value – Wilcoxon signed rank test