Skip to main content
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine logoLink to Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
. 2014 Jun 17;4(3):e16316. doi: 10.5812/aapm.16316

Acute Effect of Intravenous Administration of Magnesium Sulfate on Serum Levels of Interleukin-6 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Bypass Graft With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Parastou Aryana 1, Samira Rajaei 2, Abdolhamid Bagheri 3, Forouzan Karimi 4, Ali Dabbagh 1,*
PMCID: PMC4165031  PMID: 25237633

Abstract

Background:

Cardiovascular problems are among the most common health issues. A considerable number of cardiac patients undergo cardiac surgery, and coronary artery disease patients constitute about two-thirds of all these surgeries. The application of cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) usually results in some untoward effects.

Objectives:

Studies have suggested magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) as an anti-inflammatory agent in a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). This study aimed to assess the effect of an IV MgSO4 infusion during elective CABG (with CBP) on the blood levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α).

Materials and Methods:

During a 12 month period, after review board approval and based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 90 patients were selected and entered randomly into one of the two study groups (MgSO4 or placebo). Anesthesia, surgery and CBP were performed in exactly the same way, except for the use of MgSO4 or a placebo. Both preoperative and postoperative plasma levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were checked and compared between the two groups using an ELISA.

Results:

There was no difference found between the two groups with regard to; gender, basic variables, Ejection Fraction (EF), CBP time and aortic cross-clamp time. The preoperative levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were not different; however, their postoperative levels were significantly higher in the placebo group (P value = 0.01 for IL-6 and 0.005 for TNF-α).

Conclusions:

This study showed that MgSO4 infusion could suppress part of the inflammatory response after CABG with CBP. This was demonstrated by decreased levels of interleukin-6 and TNF-α in postoperative serum levels in elective CABG with CBP.

Keywords: Magnesium, Interleukin 6, Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha

1. Background

Cardiovascular problems are among the most common health problems worldwide, and they impose a significant disease burden (1-6). A considerable number of cardiac patients undergo cardiac surgery, with coronary artery disease patients constituting about two-thirds of all surgeries. This surgery usually includes the application of cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP)and it often has unwanted side effects (7-9). CBP is a common technique used every day for thousands of patients worldwide and its use has been practiced for more than 50 years (1, 2, 7, 10). Perhaps one of the most important complications of CBP is systemic inflammation caused by contact of blood with the CPB surface and this process induces widespread activation of the inflammatory pathways (1, 2, 5, 7, 11-15). Nowadays, the CBP circuits are usually coated with heparin, but the systemic inflammation resulting from the contact of blood with a foreign surface has not been resolved (1, 2, 5, 11-15). So far, several methods to control inflammation in patients undergoing bypass CBP have been proposed, those worth mentioning include; impregnation of the tubes with heparin (1, 2), administration of high doses of corticosteroids to prevent inflammation (7, 16, 17), using anti-inflammatory drugs (12), although none have proved to be totally effective (18-29).

2. Objectives

Recent studies have suggested that magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) solution has anti-inflammatory properties in many conditions (3-6, 30-33). In addition, it has also been demonstrated in a number of studies that magnesium can 'modulate cellular events involved in inflammation' while 'activation of leukocyte and macrophage and the release of inflammatory cytokines' are the characteristic features of this inflammatory syndrome (34, 35). Among the main proposed mechanisms for the anti-inflammatory effects of MgSO4, the 'phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway' is one of the most important ones. Meanwhile, another main mechanism seems to be the suppressing role of magnesium throughout the inflammatory process by the 'activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Since, magnesium is a natural antagonist of calcium ion and MgSO4, which acts through inhibition of 'N-methyl-D-aspartate dependent cellular pathways'(3-6, 30, 35, 36). On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that decreased plasma levels of magnesium can activate inflammatory neuromediators via the activation of 'neuroendocrinological pathways (37). At the same time, other studies have demonstrated that NF-kappaB activation with simultaneous suppression ofendotoxin, induces an increase in inflammatory mediators due to magnesium infusion in animals; furthermore, these mechanisms possibly work in a similar way in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients (3-6, 34, 38-43). A number of cytokines have been named as pro-inflammatory ones; interleukin-6 (IL 6) and tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-α) are among them (26, 38, 44, 45). This randomized clinical trial study was designed and implemented to assess the effect of an intravenous magnesium sulfate (IV MgSO4) infusion compared with a placebo, during elective CABG (with CBP) on the blood levels of IL-6 and TNF-α.

3. Materials and Methods

The study started from October 2011 for a 12 month period, after review board approval from the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Research Committee. The study complied with current ethical considerations. Authors declare that:

  • Informed consent was obtained from each patient included in the study

  • The study protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki as reflected in a priori approval by the institution's human research committee.

All patients in the operating room of Shahid Modarres (a university hospital affiliated to Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences), undergoing elective CABG surgery were the target population, and 90 patients were selected and entered the study. The patients were randomly allocated in either the control group (45 patients) or the case group (45 patients) the case group received a MgSO4 infusion and the control group received a placebo (Figure 1). Except for this classification, there were no differences between the two groups regarding; anesthesia method, surgical procedure, surgeons and physicians, or medical treatment protocols. In addition, the volume of the magnesium infusion and the placebo as well as their syringes were similar (50 mL syringes). Sample size determination was done after a power analysis (power = 0.8, β = 0.2, α = 0.02) using sample size software: PASS 2005; NCSS, LLC; UT, USA.

Figure 1. A Summary of Study Stages Are Presented in the Following Diagram.

Figure 1.

Patient entry to the study was done after obtaining an informed written consent and they were allocated into the two groups based on a computer table of random numbers and after considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

3.1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Were as Follows

3.1.1. Inclusion Criteria

  • Elective CABG using CPB

  • Age 30-65 years

3.1.2. Exclusion Criteria

  • Underlying heart failure (right sided or left sided, including low left ventricular ejection fraction, ie. preoperative LVEF < 25%)

  • Underlying renal disease

  • Underlying diabetes mellitus

  • Underlying uncontrolled hypertension

  • Underlying thyroid problems (hypo/hyperthyroidism, active or controlled)

  • Underlying malabsorption (active or controlled)

  • Underlying untreated arrhythmias

  • Underlying inflammatory disease (active or controlled)

  • Underlying uncorrected magnesium or calcium abnormalities

  • Emergent or urgent CABG

  • Patient refusal to enter or continue study

  • QTc interval abnormalities (including Torsades de pointes syndrome)

  • Co-administration of steroids, statins, aspirin/anti-inflammatory agents

After the patient's entry into the operating room, standard monitoring was administered, including; electrocardiography (ECG), pulse oxymetry and invasive blood pressure monitoring through an indwelling arterial catheter performed after the administration of local anesthetics, and the performance of an Allen test in the non-dominant radial artery. Non-heparinized arterial samples were taken from the arterial line of the patients, and these were centrifuged and then frozen at -18°C inside the Stat laboratory of the operating room, before being collected and then transferred in an ice box at -70°C to the immunology laboratory cooperating with the study. After completion of the monitoring, the patients were anesthetized using a titrated intravenous dose of sufentanil (1 µg/Kg), cisatracurium (0.2 mg/Kg) and sodium thiopental (1 mg/Kg). Then, after 3 minutes, the patients were intubated by direct laryngoscopy. A central venous catheter was inserted through the right internal jugular approach. All the patients were anesthetized using the same method with a maintenance dose of sufentanil (0.01 µg/Kg/min), atracurium (0.5 mg/min), midazolam (1 mcg/Kg/min) and isoflurane(0.2-1%), to keep Bispectral index (BIS) levels between 40-60; the surgeon and the surgical technique were similar as far as possible. At the end of the surgery, the patients were transferred to the intensive care unit, where they were extubated after full awakening, along with full recovery of their muscle function. Furthermore, the intensive care colleague made sure that the hemostatic status of the patients was stable and did not require any surgical intervention. Then, during the 2 hour period after the surgery, non-heparinized arterial samples were taken from the arterial line of the patients, and these were centrifuged at 2500 G for 10 minutes at 4°C, then frozen at -18°C inside the Statlaboratory of the ICU, before being transferred in an ice box at -70°C to the immunology laboratory cooperating with the study. After collecting all the samples, they were thawed and used for an assessment of the serum levels of IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α, using an ELISA assay. Each blood sampling, both before and after the operation, contained 10 ml blood without heparin. In both of the sampling steps, ie, before anesthesia and after transferring the patient to the ICU, the blood was centrifuged at 2500 G for 10 minutes at 4°C. Then, 2250 Lambda of the centrifuged plasma was separated and collected in Eppendorf microtubes. Next they were frozen at -18°C, and then transferred to -70°C, as described previously. The 2250 Lambda of the centrifuged serum was separated into 3 samples of 500 Lambda and one sample of 750. The 500 Lambda samples were used for an ELISA assessment of IL-6 and TNF-α. After completion of the sampling stage during the 6 month period, the samples were removed from the freezer, and the samples were melted in each ELISA well kit. The results of a standard ELISA kit based on optical density spectrophotometry were calculated as concentrations of interleukins. One of the members of the research team divided the patients randomly (according to the table of random numbers) into one of the two study groups: group 1 (MgSO4 group) or group 2 (placebo group). For the patients in group 1, a bolus dose of MgSO4 (30 mg/Kg in 5 minutes) was administered after the induction of anesthesia; then, the maintenance dose of MgSO4 (10 mg/Kg/hour) was infused. In the placebo group, the patients received normal saline with the same volume and the same infusion model. The blood samples of the patients were collected as samples of the 1st or the 2nd group and each patient was given a specific code which was noted in a data collection notebook. Meanwhile, another colleague gathered the data from the patients in the intensive care unit, in addition, she was blinded regarding the group to which the patients belonged.

The study data were recorded and extracted from each patient’s data sheet, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 11.5; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). For statistical data analysis, Student's t-test and Chi-square test were used. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

4. Results

There was no difference between the two groups regarding demographic variables including; gender, age, weight, ejection fraction (EF), cardiopulmonary bypass pump time, and aortic cross-clamp time (Table 1).

Table 1. Basic Variables in the Two Groups a.

MgSO4 group Placebo group P value
Gender > 0.05 b
Male 28 30 -
Female 17 15 -
Age, y 64 ± 8 62 ± 10 > 0.05
Weight, kg 73 ± 12 77 ± 6 > 0.05
LVEF, % 44 ± 12 47 ± 10 > 0.05
CPB time 96 ± 8 92 ± 12 > 0.05
ACC time 54 ± 6 57 ± 7 > 0.05

a Abbreviations: MgSO4, magnesium sulfate; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass pump; Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF); ACC, aortic cross-clamp.

b Chi square.

In the MgSO4 group, the post-operative level of IL6 was 67.6 ± 22.3 pg/mL; while in the placebo group, the post-operative level of IL-6 was 102.1 ± 33.7 pg/ml (P value = 0.01). Also, the postoperative level of TNF-α in the MgSO4 group was 27.4 ± 4.2 pg/mL; while in the placebo group, the post-operative level of TNF-α was 44.7 ± 6.1 pg/mL (P value = 0.005).

5. Discussion

The results of this study demonstrated that administration of MgSO4 solution in adult patients undergoing elective CABG could suppress part of the inflammatory response after CABG with CPB. This was demonstrated as decreased levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in postoperative serum. However, the two groups had no difference in regard to cardiopulmonary bypass items, surgical variables, or anesthetic parameters; this indicated that the underlying clinical situations for the study were largely identical in the two groups. Magnesium may 'modulate cellular inflammation' while 'suppressing the inflammatory role of inflammatory cells and cytokines' (34, 35) through the 'activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors', 'phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway' and suppression of inflammatory neuromediators through the activation of 'neuro-endocrinological pathways' as the main mechanisms; since, magnesium is a natural antagonist of calcium ion (3-6, 30, 35-37, 42). The inflammatory response after CBP is one of the most significant side effects of this surgical intervention, and a number of compensatory mechanisms and approaches have been proposed, though many remain equivocal (1, 2, 10, 12, 27, 45-49). Magnesium infusion is an easy and routine therapeutic agent, and its anti-inflammatory effects are an important effect of the drug (4, 31, 35, 39, 50, 51). There are many studies denoting the therapeutic effects of magnesium infusion on many other systems, including its positive effects on the cardiovascular and respiratory system, as well as its analgesic effects (30). Since the usage of magnesium infusion could lead to improved inflammatory status, according to this study, it can be recommended that a magnesium infusion is used to suppress some of the inflammation in a cost effective way.

5.1. Limitations

Among the study methods, the limited assessment episodes of IL-6 and TNF-α assessments are among the main limitations of the study. Moreover, other interleukins could be helpful for making more exact assessments. The sample size was also limited.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the kind help of physicians and nurses in the OR and ICU, Shahid Modarres Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

Footnotes

Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:An infusion of magnesium sulfate can suppress part of the inflammatory response following a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP). This was demonstrated as decreased levels of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), found in postoperative serum levels after elective CABG with CBP.

Authors' Contributions:Parastou Aryana: study concept and design, acquisition of data, drafting of the manuscript, technical, and material support, and study supervision; Samira Rajaei: study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and study supervision; Abdolhamid Bagheri: study concept and design, interpretation of data, and drafting of the manuscript; Forouzan Karimi: study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting of the manuscript; Ali Dabbagh: study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, statistical analysis, administrative, technical and material support, and study supervision.

Funding Support:Anesthesiology Research Center, ShahidBeheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

References

  • 1.Warren OJ, Smith AJ, Alexiou C, Rogers PL, Jawad N, Vincent C, et al. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: part 1--mechanisms of pathogenesis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23(2):223–31. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Warren OJ, Watret AL, de Wit KL, Alexiou C, Vincent C, Darzi AW, et al. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: part 2--anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23(3):384–93. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dabbagh A, Elyasi H, Razavi SS, Fathi M, Rajaei S. Intravenous magnesium sulfate for post-operative pain in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(8):1088–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02025.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dabbagh A, Rajaei S, Shamsolahrar MH. The effect of intravenous magnesium sulfate on acute postoperative bleeding in elective coronary artery bypass surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 2010;25(5):290–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2010.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ferasatkish R, Dabbagh A, Alavi M, Mollasadeghi G, Hydarpur E, Moghadam AA, et al. Effect of magnesium sulfate on extubation time and acute pain in coronary artery bypass surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(10):1348–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01783.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mirkheshti A, Aryani MR, Shojaei P, Dabbagh A. The Effect of Adding Magnesium Sulfate to Lidocaine Compared with Paracetamol in Prevention of Acute Pain in Hand Surgery Patients Under Intravenous Regional Anesthesia (IVRA). Int J Prev Med. 2012;3(9):616–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Serrano CV Jr, Souza JA, Lopes NH, Fernandes JL, Nicolau JC, Blotta MH, et al. Reduced expression of systemic proinflammatory and myocardial biomarkers after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study. J Crit Care. 2010;25(2):305–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alonso A, Whitten CW, Hill GE. Pump prime only aprotinin inhibits cardiopulmonary bypass-induced neutrophil CD11b up-regulation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(2):392–5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01132-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rajaei S, Dabbagh A. Risk factors for postoperative respiratory mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Pain Med. 2012;2(2):60–5. doi: 10.5812/aapm.5228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dabbagh A, Rajaei S, Ahani MR. Sodium thiopental and mean arterial pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2011;19(3-4):213–6. doi: 10.1177/0218492311411316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Miller BE, Levy JH. The inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1997;11(3):355–66. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(97)90106-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Patel JA, Ghatak SB. Pexelizumab and its role in the treatment of myocardial infarction and in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a review. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov. 2008;3(2):145–52. doi: 10.2174/157489008784705322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Murphy GS, Hessel EA 2nd, Groom RC. Optimal perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: an evidence-based approach. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(5):1394–417. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181875e2e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lante W, Franke A, Weinhold C, Markewitz A. Immunoglobulin levels and lymphocyte subsets following cardiac operations: further evidence for a T-helper cell shifting. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;53(1):16–22. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-830324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wan S, LeClerc JL, Vincent JL. Cytokine responses to cardiopulmonary bypass: lessons learned from cardiac transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63(1):269–76. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(96)00931-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yasser Mohamed A, Elmistekawy E, El-Serogy H. Effects of dexamethasone on pulmonary and renal functions in patients undergoing CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;13(4):231–7. doi: 10.1177/1089253209351598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chaney MA. Corticosteroids and cardiopulmonary bypass : a review of clinical investigations. Chest. 2002;121(3):921–31. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.3.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beckerman Z, Shopen Y, Alon H, Cohen O, Nir RR, Adler Z, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting after aprotinin: are we doing better? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):243–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Howell N, Senanayake E, Freemantle N, Pagano D. Putting the record straight on aprotinin as safe and effective: results from a mixed treatment meta-analysis of trials of aprotinin. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):234–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hutton B, Joseph L, Fergusson D, Mazer CD, Shapiro S, Tinmouth A. Risks of harms using antifibrinolytics in cardiac surgery: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies. BMJ. 2012;345:e16316. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pasquali SK, Li JS, He X, Jacobs ML, O'Brien SM, Hall M, et al. Comparative analysis of antifibrinolytic medications in pediatric heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(3):550–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.06.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Van Aelbrouck C, Englberger L, Faraoni D. Review of the fibrinolytic system: comparison of different antifibrinolytics used during cardiopulmonary bypass. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov. 2012;7(3):175–9. doi: 10.2174/157489012803832793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dietrich W. Aprotinin: 1 year on. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22(1):121–7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32831c833f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fergusson DA, Hebert PC, Mazer CD, Fremes S, MacAdams C, Murkin JM, et al. A comparison of aprotinin and lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(22):2319–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Murkin JM. Lessons learned in antifibrinolytic therapy: The BART trial. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;13(2):127–31. doi: 10.1177/1089253209338076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hill GE, Alonso A, Spurzem JR, Stammers AH, Robbins RA. Aprotinin and methylprednisolone equally blunt cardiopulmonary bypass-induced inflammation in humans. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110(6):1658–62. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70027-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Apostolakis EE, Koletsis EN, Baikoussis NG, Siminelakis SN, Papadopoulos GS. Strategies to prevent intraoperative lung injury during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;5:1. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-5-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Takagi H, Manabe H, Kawai N, Goto SN, Umemoto T. Aprotinin increases mortality as compared with tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized head-to-head trials. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9(1):98–101. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.198325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ide M, Bolliger D, Taketomi T, Tanaka KA. Lessons from the aprotinin saga: current perspective on antifibrinolytic therapy in cardiac surgery. J Anesth. 2010;24(1):96–106. doi: 10.1007/s00540-009-0866-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.James MF. Magnesium: an emerging drug in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(4):465–7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dowling O, Chatterjee PK, Gupta M, Tam Tam HB, Xue X, Lewis D, et al. Magnesium sulfate reduces bacterial LPS-induced inflammation at the maternal-fetal interface. Placenta. 2012;33(5):392–8. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sedighi M, Pourpak Z, Bavarian B, Safaralizadeh R, Zare A, Moin M. Low magnesium concentration in erythrocytes of children with acute asthma. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006;5(4):183–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Singh AK, Gaur S, Kumar R. A randomized controlled trial of intravenous magnesium sulphate as an adjunct to standard therapy in acute severe asthma. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008;7(4):221–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mazur A, Maier JA, Rock E, Gueux E, Nowacki W, Rayssiguier Y. Magnesium and the inflammatory response: potential physiopathological implications. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007;458(1):48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rayssiguier Y, Libako P, Nowacki W, Rock E. Magnesium deficiency and metabolic syndrome: stress and inflammation may reflect calcium activation. Magnes Res. 2010;23(2):73–80. doi: 10.1684/mrh.2010.0208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ren K, Dubner R. Central nervous system plasticity and persistent pain. J Orofac Pain. 1999;13(3):155–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Iezhitsa IN, Spasov AA, Kharitonova MV, Kravchenko MS. Effect of magnesium chloride on psychomotor activity, emotional status, and acute behavioural responses to clonidine, d-amphetamine, arecoline, nicotine, apomorphine, and L-5-hydroxytryptophan. Nutr Neurosci. 2011;14(1):10–24. doi: 10.1179/174313211X12966635733277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Amash A, Holcberg G, Sheiner E, Huleihel M. Magnesium sulfate normalizes placental interleukin-6 secretion in preeclampsia. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2010;30(9):683–90. doi: 10.1089/jir.2010.0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gries A, Bode C, Gross S, Peter K, Bohrer H, Martin E. The effect of intravenously administered magnesium on platelet function in patients after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999;88(6):1213–9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199906000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dong JF, Cruz MA, Aboulfatova K, Martin C, Choi H, Bergeron AL, et al. Magnesium maintains endothelial integrity, up-regulates proteolysis of ultra-large von Willebrand factor, and reduces platelet aggregation under flow conditions. Thromb Haemost. 2008;99(3):586–93. doi: 10.1160/TH07-11-0694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Su NY, Peng TC, Tsai PS, Huang CJ. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway is involved in mediating the anti-inflammation effects of magnesium sulfate. J Surg Res. 2013;185(2):726–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lin CY, Tsai PS, Hung YC, Huang CJ. L-type calcium channels are involved in mediating the anti-inflammatory effects of magnesium sulphate. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(1):44–51. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dabbagh A, Rajaei S, Bahadori Monfared A, Keramatinia AA, Omidi K. Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Inflammation and How to Defy it: Focus on Pharmacological Interventions. Iran J Pharm Res. 2012;11(3):705–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Karu I, Tahepold P, Sulling TA, Alver M, Zilmer M, Starkopf J. Off-pump coronary surgery causes immediate release of myocardial damage markers. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2009;17(5):494–9. doi: 10.1177/0218492309348637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rimmele T, Venkataraman R, Madden NJ, Elder MM, Wei LM, Pellegrini RV, et al. Comparison of inflammatory response during on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Int J Artif Organs. 2010;33(3):131–8. doi: 10.1177/039139881003300301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Agus MS, Steil GM, Wypij D, Costello JM, Laussen PC, Langer M, et al. Tight glycemic control versus standard care after pediatric cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1208–19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baranowska K, Juszczyk G, Dmitruk I, Knapp M, Tycinska A, Jakubow P, et al. Risk factors of neurological complications in cardiac surgery. Kardiol Pol. 2012;70(8):811–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bojko B, Vuckovic D, Mirnaghi F, Cudjoe E, Wasowicz M, Jerath A, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of tranexamic acid concentration: high-throughput analysis with solid-phase microextraction. Ther Drug Monit. 2012;34(1):31–7. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3182400540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Heijmans J, Fransen E, Buurman W, Maessen J, Roekaerts P. Comparison of the modulatory effects of four different fast-track anesthetic techniques on the inflammatory response to cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21(4):512–8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2007.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ishihara M, Ikesue H, Matsunaga H, Suemaru K, Kitaichi K, Suetsugu K, et al. A multi-institutional study analyzing effect of prophylactic medication for prevention of opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction. Clin J Pain. 2012;28(5):373–81. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318237d626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wagner LK. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia. Am Fam Physician. 2004;70(12):2317–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine are provided here courtesy of Brieflands

RESOURCES