Abstract
A mixture of bismuth nitrate pentahydrate and potassium aryltrifluoroborate in toluene under microwave heating at 120 °C for 20 min provides an interesting and mild reaction protocol for the synthesis of aryl nitrite. The conversion to aryl nitrites from aryltrifluoroborates without transition metal catalyst and base in high yields is remarkable.
Keywords: Bismuth nitrate as nitrite source, Catalyst free reaction, Potassium aryltrifluoroborates, Microwave
Nitration of aromatic compounds is an extensively studied field of organic synthesis.1 Nitro group addition provides important physical and chemical properties to target compounds. The metabolism of aromatic amines and aromatic nitro compounds is effectively interconnected. So, it is important to see a new development in aryl nitrite synthesis. Compared to classical strong conditions for the nitration process, a new milder technique of nitration of aromatic compounds by cross-coupling of aryl halides with sodium nitrite and potassium nitrite has been developed recently.2 Potassium organotrifluoroborates have already proven to be unique boron reagents for organic transformations. Molander has pioneered several new developments using organotrifluoroborate salts.3 We also use organotrifluoroborates in various organic transformations.4 Very recently, we reported the palladium catalyzed cross-coupling of potassium styryl- and aryltrifluoroborates with sodium nitrite to give the corresponding styryl-, and arylnitrites.5 In this work, we found bismuth nitrate is a good nitrite source that formed aryl nitrites when microwaved with potassium aryltrifluoroborates without adding transition metal catalyst and base (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.

Our report of PdCl2(dtbpf)-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction of styryl- and aryltrifluoroborates with sodium nitrite in the presence of NaH2PO4·H2O encouraged us to seek the effect of bismuth nitrate for a similar study. Under those conditions, however, reaction failed. Bismuth nitrate arrives from the vendor in hydrated form: Bi(NO3)3·5H2O. To counterbalance the hydrated nature of the bismuth nitrate, we swapped the hydrated base with an anhydrous variant: NaH2PO4, and found an interesting change (Scheme 2). 1:6 ratio of styryltrifluoroborate and bismuth nitrate pentahydrate showed the predicted styryl nitrite without homocoupling product, but compared to the organonitrite reaction process run with sodium nitrite5, this process is sluggish and reproducibility is also low. Concurrently, when we applied bismuth nitrate pentahydrate with potassium p-tolylltrifluoroborate, clean transformation to p-tolylnitrite was observed (Scheme 3). Many control experiments were run to optimize reaction conditions, and the best conditions for complete conversion to p-tolylnitrite were found to be one equivalent of p-tolyltrifluoroborate and one equivalent of bismuth nitrate in toluene microwaved at 120 °C for 20 min (Table 1). p-Tolylnitrite 3a from p-tolyltrifluoroborate la and bismuth nitrate pentahydrate 2 is a representative procedure (Table 1, entry 1). To an oven dried reaction tube with magnetic stirrer bar were added p-tolyltrifluoroborate (49.4 mg, 0.25 mmol), bismuth nitrate (121.3 mg 0.25 mmol), and anhydrous toluene (2.0 mL) under an inert atmosphere of Argon, followed by insertion of the reaction tube into the microwave and heating at 120 °C for 20 min. The resulting reaction product was filtered through a sintered funnel with a Celite bed using 50 mL ethyl acetate. The product solution was analyzed by GC-MS, evaporated, and purified by preparative TLC. Mass spectra, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR confirmed the product. LRMS: Calculated for C7H7NO2 M+ 137. Found: 137. 1H NMR (Acetone-d6, 300 MHz) δ 8.14–7.47 (m, 4H), 2.47 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (Acetone-d6, 75.5 MHz) δ 147.2, 131.1, 130.5, 129.8, 124.2, 21.5. Reactions were carried out via standard dry system under an inert atmosphere of Argon or in open air. Both systems were equally effective but the Argon atmosphere condition provided cleaner looking result. All potassium aryltrifluoroborates shown in Table 1 were prepared from the corresponding arylboronic acids by applying the known method.6
Scheme 2.

Styrylnitrites from cross-coupling of styryltrifluoroborates and Bi(NO3)3·5H2O in toluene.
aReported condition with base NaH2PO4 (Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 1141.)
Scheme 3.

a0.25 mmol scale. b1.0 mmol scale. Best condition was found in Run 6.
Table 1.
Reaction of aryltrifluoroborates 1 and Bi(NO3)3·5H2O 2 for arylnitrites 3a
| 1 |
|
99% yields |
| 2 |
|
49 % |
| 3 |
|
80 % |
| 4 |
|
99 % |
| 5 |
|
90 % |
| 6 |
|
98 % |
| 7 |
|
60 % |
| 8 |
|
96 % |
| 9 |
|
0.25 mmol of arylfluoroborate, 0.25 mmol of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O, and 2.0 mL of toluene microwaved at 120 °C for 20 min. Preparative TLC technique was used for purification.
The Prokash group used a mixture of silver nitrate salt and chloromethylsilane as nitrating agent and produced nitroarenes when treated with arylboronic acid at room temperature for 30–72 h in poor to moderate yields (20–98%).7 In this Letter the nitration process is mild and yields are high. Bismuth nitrate pentahydrate is a successful Lewis acid and provides a nitro group when reacted with potassium aryltrifluoroborate as its Lewis base. The high electron affinity of bismuth toward fluorine enhances the nitration process.8 In case of 4-methoxyaryltrifluoroborate, yield was low (Table 1, entry 2). No nitration product was observed when 4-pyridinyltrifluoroborate was employed as arylating agent (Table 1, entry 9). Most likely, the basic nature of the pyridine moiety is competing with the trifluoroborate moiety of aryltrifluoroborate. A proposed mechanism that accounts for this nitration is portrayed in Scheme 4.
Scheme 4.

The microwave heated minute reaction between potassium aryltrifluoroborates and bismuth nitrate is a new process and a clear improvement on existing nitration techniques. In summary, we find a new application of potassium aryltrifluoroborates with bismuth nitrate and present an efficient process for the synthesis of aryl nitrites without catalyst and base. Application of this nitration process in natural product synthesis and in highly substituted aryltrifluoroborates is currently under investigation.
Acknowledgments
Financial support from US department of education Title III Grant, Tennessee State University is thankfully acknowledged. Rebecca Welch also gratefully acknowledges the receipt of a MARC fellowship from NIH’s MARC program for her undergraduate research study (National Institutes of Health 2T34GM007663-32).
References and notes
- 1.(a) Schofield K. Aromatic Nitration. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 1980. [Google Scholar]; (b) Olah GS, Malhotra R, Narang SC. Nitration: Methods and Mechanism. VCH Publishers; New York: 1989. [Google Scholar]; (c) Bak RR, Smallridge AJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:6767–6769. [Google Scholar]; (d) Ridd JH. Acta Chem Scand. 1998;52:11–22. [Google Scholar]; (e) Mori T, Suzuki H. Synlett. 1995:383–392. [Google Scholar]; (f) Tani K, Lukin K, Eaton PEJ. Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:1476–1479. [Google Scholar]; (g) Eberson L, Radner F. Ace Chem Res. 1987;20:53–59. [Google Scholar]; (h) Suzuki H, Murashima T, Shimizu K, Tsukamoto K. Chem Lett. 1991:817–818. [Google Scholar]
- 2.(a) Fors BP, Buchwald L. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:12898–12899. doi: 10.1021/ja905768k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Saito S, Koizumi Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:4715–4717. [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Molander GA, Figueroa R. Aldrichchimica Acta. 2005;38:49–56. [Google Scholar]; (b) Molander GA, Ellis N. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40:275–286. doi: 10.1021/ar050199q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Darses S, Genet J-P. Chem Rev. 2008;108:288–325. doi: 10.1021/cr0509758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Al-Masum M, Liu K-Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:5090–5093. [Google Scholar]; (b) Al-Masum M, Ng E, Wai MC. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:1008–1010. [Google Scholar]; (c) Kabalka GW, Al-Masum M. Org Lett. 2006;8:11–15. doi: 10.1021/ol051955v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Al-Masum M, Alam S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:5201–5204. [Google Scholar]; (e) Kabalka GW, Dadush E, Al-Masum M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:7459–7461. [Google Scholar]; (f) Kabalka GW, Al-Masum M, Mereddy AR, Dadush E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006;47:1133–1136. [Google Scholar]; (g) Kabalka GW, Al-Masum M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005;46:6329–6331. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Al-Masum M, Saleh N, Islam T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013;54:1141–1144. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.12.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vedejs E, Fields SC, Hayashi R, Hitchcock SR, Powell DR, Schrimpf MR. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:2460–2470. [Google Scholar]
- 7.(a) Prakash GKS, Panja C, Mathew T, Surampudi V, Petasis NA, Olah GA. Org Lett. 2004;6:2205–2207. doi: 10.1021/ol0493249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sun H-B, Hua R, Yin YJ. Org Chem. 2005;70:9071–9073. doi: 10.1021/jo0514669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Electron affinity of Bi, Si, Sn, and F are 91.2 KJ/mol, 133.6 KJ/mol, 107.3 KJ/mole,and 329 KJ/mol, respectively; electronegativity Bi, Si, Sn, and F are 2.02, 1.9, 1.96, and 3.98 respectively; valence of Bi, Si, Sn, and F are 5, 4, 4, and 1, respectively. Norman NC. Chemistry of Arsenic, Antimony and Bismuth. Vol. 1998 Springer publisher;
