Skip to main content
Worm logoLink to Worm
. 2014 May 8;3:e29102. doi: 10.4161/worm.29102

C. elegans sirtuin SIR-2.4 and its mammalian homolog SIRT6 in stress response

Monika Jedrusik-Bode 1,*
PMCID: PMC4165542  PMID: 26442197

Abstract

Stress is a significant life event. The immediate response to stress is critical for survival. In organisms ranging from the unicellular Saccharomyces cerevisiae to protozoa (Trypanosoma brucei) and metazoan (such as Caenorhabditis elegans, Homo sapiens) stress response leads to the formation of cytoplasmic RNA–protein complexes referred to as stress granules (SGs). SGs regulate cell survival during stress by the sequestration of the signaling molecules implicated in apoptosis. They are a transient place of messenger ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs) remodeling for storage, degradation, or reinitiation of translation during stress and recovery from stress. Recently, we have identified chromatin factor, the sirtuin C. elegans SIR-2.4 variant and its mammalian homolog SIRT6 as a regulator of SGs formation. SIRT6 is highly conserved NAD+-dependent lysine deacetylase and ADP-ribosyltransferase impacting longevity, metabolism, and cancer. We observed that the cellular formation of SGs by SIRT6 or SIR-2.4 was linked with the cell viability or C. elegans survival and was dependent on SIRT6 enzymatic activity. Here, we discuss how SIR-2.4/SIRT6 influences SGs formation and stress response. We suggest possible mechanisms for such an unanticipated function of a chromatin regulatory factor SIRT6 in assembly of stress granules and cellular stress resistance.

Keywords: sirtuins, SIR-2, SIRT6, SIR-2.4, SIR-2.3, SIR-2.2, stress granules, P-granules, heat shock

Stress Granules and Their Speculated Function

Stress granules form naturally when a cell deals with a variety of environmental stresses, including heat shock, oxidative stress, hyperosmolarity, viral infection, and UV irradiation.1 They are non-membranous cytoplasmic foci ranging in size from 0.1–2.0 µm, containing non-translating messenger ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs), ribosomal subunits, eukaryotic initiation factors (eIF) 2, 3, 4, poly mRNA, polyA binding proteins (PABP, PABPC1), the argonaute proteins, microRNAs, mRNA-editing enzymes, RasGAP-associated endoribonuclease (G3BP), and proteins implicated in neurodegenerative or neurologic diseases such as ataxin-2 (ATX-2), survival motor neuron protein (SMN), the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP).1-6

Stress granules are found in plants, yeast, protozoa, and metazoan, in both cultured cell lines and intact tissues.2 In C. elegans, stress granules have been observed in the cytoplasm of somatic as well as germline cells in response to stress (e.g., heat shock).7 Unlike in mammalian cells, in which SGs and processing bodies (P-bodies) are spatially separable, in C. elegans SGs interact with P-bodies and germ granules.1,7-9

P-bodies are distinct from germ granules, and represent a second class of RNA granules that behaves differently in somatic and germline cells. Analyses in C. elegans have shown that certain P-body components co-localize with germ granules and with two markers of stress granules, poly (A) binding protein (PABP) and TIA-1 presented in the oocyte large ribonucleoprotein (RNP) foci.9 These protein–protein interactions suggest that stress granules, P-bodies, and germ granules may function together to regulate the balance of translated, repressed, and degraded mRNAs in germ cells.9

The dynamic nature of stress granules suggests that they are sites of mRNA triage, wherein mRNAs are dynamically sorted for storage, degradation, or translation during stress and recovery.2 SGs have also been shown to regulate the stability of selected mRNAs and control the survival of stressed cells through recruitment of signaling proteins, transcription factors, RNA helicases, nucleases, and kinases into SGs.1,2

In cultured cell lines, the assembly/disassembly of SGs shows age-related changes in response to stress.10 In contrast, little is known about the mechanisms governing the assembly of SGs in response to environmental stimuli in the physiological intact animal, in tissue and organ systems, or in both germ cell and somatic cell lineages.

Sirtuin sir-2 Gene Family is Evolutionary Highly Conserved in Amino Acid Sequence, Function, and Interaction Partners

Intriguing factors linking cellular activities to stress- and age-related diseases are silent information regulator 2 (SIR-2) proteins, also termed sirtuins. Sirtuins have a function in diverse cellular pathways, regulating transcriptional repression, aging, metabolism, cell defenses against DNA damage, and apoptosis.11,12 Sirtuins appear to be activated in the nucleus as well as in the cytoplasm as part of a beneficial cellular response to stress, resulting in cell survival and extended lifespan in yeast, worms, flies, and mice. However, more recent studies have called the results with C. elegans and D. melanogaster into question because mechanistic studies have not converged on a specific activity coupled to aging.13

Recently, we have shown that assembly and disassembly of stress granules components in mammals and P-granules components in C. elegans can be regulated by a chromatin factor, the C. elegans sirtuin SIR-2.4 variant and its mammalian homolog SIRT6. SIRT6 possesses an ADP-ribosyltransferase and NAD+-dependent deacetylase activity of both acetyl groups and long-chain fatty-acyl groups.14 SIRT6 plays an important function in cellular homeostasis by regulating DNA repair, telomere maintenance, glucose, and lipid metabolism, thus contributing to the overall longevity and health of the organism.14-21 Role of sirtuins in stress granules assembly and survival has not been determined, although stress granules contain a large number of post-translationally modified proteins that control the assembly of the granules.22

Mammals possess seven sirtuins, SIRT1-SIRT7. The C. elegans genome encodes four sirtuins, SIR-2.1 through SIR-2.4, thus offering an excellent model system to analyze sirtuins stress-stimulated mechanisms of action in a multicellular organism.23 Whereas the majority of studies in the worm have focused on the mammalian SIRT1 homolog, SIR-2.1, due to its role in lifespan determination and germline silencing, SIR-2.2, 2.3, and 2.4 are largely uncharacterized.24,25 We have recently described the function, localization, and interactome of the mitochondrial SIR-2.2 and SIR-2.3 as well as of the nuclear SIR-2.4 (Table 1).26,27 As shown (Table 1), the sirtuins are an evolutionarily conserved protein family regarding their amino acid sequences, localization, and interaction partners.

Table 1. The sirtuin sir-2 gene family in C. elegans.

SIR-2 Mutant strain Phenotype Localization Interaction partners BlastP
similarity
SIR-2.1 sir-2.1 (ok434)III Superficially wild-type13 nucleus12,13 PAR-5 (14–3-3), CEP-1 (p53), DAF-16 (FoxO), H3K9 (H3K9)12 44% SIRT1
SIR-2.2 sir-2.2 (tm2648)X
sir-2.2
(tm2673)X
Superficially wild-type26 mitochondria26 PYC-1 (PC), PCC-1 (PCC), F32B6.2 (MCCC)26 49% SIRT4
SIR-2.3 sir-2.3
(ok444)X
Superficially wild-type26 mitochondria26 PYC-1 (PC), PCC-1 (PCC), F32B6.2 (MCCC)26 42% SIRT4
SIR-2.4 sir-2.4 (tm2817)I Sensitive to stress27,28 nucleus, nuclear membrane, P-granules27 K08F4.2 (G3BP),27 DAF-16 (nd)28 38% SIRT6

The SIR-2-interactions are evolutionarily conserved (mammalian homologs in brackets). SIR-2.2 and SIR-2.3 interact with mitochondrial biotin-dependent carboxylases: PC, pyruvate carboxylase; PCC, propionyl-CoA carboxylase; MCCC, methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase; nd, not determined.

SGs Formation is an Evolutionarily Conserved Aspect of C. elegans SIR-2.4/Mammalian SIRT6

We and others observed that SIR-2.4 is required for normal stress resistance in the worm.9,27 We found a correlation between the survival rate of sir-2.4 mutant animals and the number of P-granules in germline cells implying a function of SIR-2.4 in the regulation of lifespan and P-granules formation in response to stress.27 Under non-stress conditions, endogenous SIR-2.4 was primarily found in the nucleus, associated with the nuclear envelope and P-granules in germ cells.27 Following heat shock, SIR-2.4 rapidly and reversibly redistributed into cytoplasmic P-granules structures. Interestingly, P-granules share many properties with mammalian stress granules and P-bodies. For example, the number of P-granules is increased in stressed and aged animals.2,9,26,29 We have shown that the changes in size and number of P-granules were altered by growth temperature and by SIR-2.4. Furthermore, we observed that P-granules proteins (e.g., PGL-1/3 and GLH-1.2) specifically interact with SIR-2.4.27 Additionally, we demonstrated that SIR-2.4 in somatic cells is also recruited to bright cytoplasmic foci (granules) in response to heat shock. In order to examine SIR-2.4 regulation in vivo, we performed yeast two hybrid screen (Y2HS). We found that C. elegans SIR-2.4 variant interacts with a protein encoded by cDNA clone K08F4.2. K08F4.2 encodes a protein that possesses a high amino acid sequence similarity to mammalian G3BP (the Ras-GTPase activating enzyme). Thus, our data fit quite well with our studies showing that mammalian SIRT6 protects cells against heat-shock through the interaction with G3BP.27

In mammalian cells, we observed that SIRT6 shifted from a predominant nuclear localization to both nuclear and cytoplasmic when stressed by heat shock or sodium arsenite treatment, and that SIRT6 indirectly regulates dephosphorylation of G3BPSer149, an important step during SG formation.30 Similar to the situation in C. elegans, loss of SIRT6 affected stress granules formation and decreased mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) viability. In particular, the granules were reduced in the size after heat shock in SIRT6-deficient MEFs in contrast to wild-type MEFs. Furthermore, addition of the sirtuin inhibitor nicotinamide (NAM), which inhibits deacetylase and mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase activities, also altered the size of stress granules in wild-type MEFs similar to those in cells lacking SIRT6, thus implying important function of SIRT6 enzymatic activity in the assembly and disassembly of SGs. Interestingly, the SIRT6 functions on stress granules assembly were not found with other sirtuin variants. Our work summarized above raised questions how C. elegans SIR-2.4 and its mammalian homolog SIRT6 influence stress granule formation and cellular stress resistance.

Potential Molecular Mechanism of C. elegans SIR-2.4 in Stress Conditions

As previously shown, C. elegans SIR-2.4 is required for resistance to stressors such as heat shock through promoting DAF-16-dependent transcription and proper stress granules assembly.27,28 The nuclear SIR-2.4 regulates DAF-16/FoxO acetylation indirectly, by preventing CBP-1-mediated acetylation under stress conditions.28 It seems that an important function of SIR-2.4 is to promote DAF-16 nuclear recruitment and its transcriptional activity, and to control the expression of genes associated with aging and stress response such as SOD-3, HSP-16.1, DOD-3, DOD-24, INS-7.28 Additionally, following heat shock, SIR-2.4 can be rapidly and reversibly redistributed into dynamic and cytoplasmic foci (granules) in the cytoplasm of somatic as well as of germline cells.27 These data are consistent with our results regarding mammalian SIRT6 redistribution under stress response. In mammals, it is conceivable that a nuclear interaction between SIRT6 and G3BP modulates cytoplasmic functions of G3BP in stress granule assembly. This mechanism is due to dephosporylation of G3BP in a SIRT6-dependent manner in the nucleus that could alter G3BP function upon cytoplasmic translocation.27 However, we cannot exclude that a minor fraction of SIRT6 present in secretory organelles, such as the endoplasmic reticulum,31 might directly regulate G3BP function during cytoplasmic SGs assembly. Interestingly, sirtuin SIR-2.4 regulates DAF-16 function as well as stress granules assembly through other mechanisms than direct substrate modification.27,28 Since we did not detect that SIRT6 deacetylates G3BP in vivo or in vitro we argue that SIRT6 did not direct modify G3BP. It has been speculated that SIRT6 can act as an NAD+ metabolic sensor, binds NAD+, and undergoes a conformational switch in the absence of substrate.32 It seems likely that SIRT6 regulates components of the enzymatic machinery that controls the dephosphorylation status of G3BP. We can also not exclude that SIRT6 modifies additional proteins in the SGs multiprotein complex, and therefore, stabilizes the SIRT6-G3BP interaction, and impacts stress granules assembly via other mechanisms. It is possible that SIRT6 operates in the context of a chaperone complex (e.g., 14-3-3 or HSP-70) or microtubule network to promote the maturation of nuclear and cytoplasmic clients. SIRT6 might require chaperons for efficient activity. This interaction might stabilize an active conformation of SIRT6, and subsequently, stimulate protein deacetylation at the site of action. In turn, the enzymatic activity of SIRT6 can provide a rapid, economical, and reversible means to adjust protein functions during stress, thus affecting the survival as was observed.

It is surprising to observe that the nuclear protein SIRT6 accumulates in cytoplasmic SGs. Potentially, the nucleus undergoes a certain level of shutdown after stress to conserve energy and to sequester some nuclear proteins in cytoplasmic compartments thus providing a means for quick response to environmental changes. It is conceivable that the SIRT6 SGs function as quality control center to determine which proteins or RNAs need to be degraded, repaired, or stored. Deletion of SIRT6 or SIR-2.4 affects SGs formation, therefore including the possibility that SIRT6 have a regulatory role in the structure and dynamics of SGs. We argue that the recruitment of SIRT6 into SGs is not simply a result of non-specific protein aggregation. First, SIRT6 foci are reversible structures that disassemble immediately when stressors are replenished. Protein aggregation usually cannot be reversed in such a manner.33,34 Second, the assembly and disassembly of SIRT6 SGs are regulated by the presence of stressors and also exhibited specific kinetics and patterns, which are uncharacteristic for non-specific protein aggregation.35

Concluding Remarks

Sirtuin family members have been implicated in aging and age-related diseases. Our studies reveal that SIRT6, in addition to its role in genomic stability, telomere protection, and modifications of histones, also regulates stress granules formation and cellular stress resistance through interplay with SGs components. By further dissecting the function of SIRT6 in SGs and its deacetylase activity in heat shock stressed cells, we may be able to uncover new pathways that cells use to regulate cellular stress response and lifespan.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

I am especially grateful to Sigrid Hoyer-Fender (University of Goettingen) for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the German National Funding Agency (DFG: JE 505/1-3 to Jedrusik-Bode M).

10.4161/worm.29102

References

  • 1.Anderson P, Kedersha N. RNA granules. J Cell Biol. 2006;172:803–8. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200512082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anderson P, Kedersha N. Stress granules. Curr Biol. 2009;19:R397–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nonhoff U, Ralser M, Welzel F, Piccini I, Balzereit D, Yaspo ML, Lehrach H, Krobitsch S. Ataxin-2 interacts with the DEAD/H-box RNA helicase DDX6 and interferes with P-bodies and stress granules. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:1385–96. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-12-1120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hua Y, Zhou J. Survival motor neuron protein facilitates assembly of stress granules. FEBS Lett. 2004;572:69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vanderweyde T, Yu H, Varnum M, Liu-Yesucevitz L, Citro A, Ikezu T, Duff K, Wolozin B. Contrasting pathology of the stress granule proteins TIA-1 and G3BP in tauopathies. J Neurosci. 2012;32:8270–83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1592-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Linder B, Plöttner O, Kroiss M, Hartmann E, Laggerbauer B, Meister G, Keidel E, Fischer U. Tdrd3 is a novel stress granule-associated protein interacting with the Fragile-X syndrome protein FMRP. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:3236–46. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sun Y, Yang P, Zhang Y, Bao X, Li J, Hou W, Yao X, Han J, Zhang H. A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies genes regulating the formation of P bodies in C. elegans and their functions in NMD and RNAi. Protein Cell. 2011;2:918–39. doi: 10.1007/s13238-011-1119-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gallo CM, Munro E, Rasoloson D, Merritt C, Seydoux G. Processing bodies and germ granules are distinct RNA granules that interact in C. elegans embryos. Dev Biol. 2008;323:76–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jud MC, Czerwinski MJ, Wood MP, Young RA, Gallo CM, Bickel JS, Petty EL, Mason JM, Little BA, Padilla PA, et al. Large P body-like RNPs form in C. elegans oocytes in response to arrested ovulation, heat shock, osmotic stress, and anoxia and are regulated by the major sperm protein pathway. Dev Biol. 2008;318:38–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gallouzi IE. Could stress granules be involved in age-related diseases? Aging (Albany NY) 2009;1:753–7. doi: 10.18632/aging.100090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Haigis MC, Guarente LP. Mammalian sirtuins--emerging roles in physiology, aging, and calorie restriction. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2913–21. doi: 10.1101/gad.1467506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Greiss S, Gartner A. Sirtuin/Sir2 phylogeny, evolutionary considerations and structural conservation. Mol Cells. 2009;28:407–15. doi: 10.1007/s10059-009-0169-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Burnett C, Valentini S, Cabreiro F, Goss M, Somogyvári M, Piper MD, Hoddinott M, Sutphin GL, Leko V, McElwee JJ, et al. Absence of effects of Sir2 overexpression on lifespan in C. elegans and Drosophila. Nature. 2011;477:482–5. doi: 10.1038/nature10296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kugel S, Mostoslavsky R. Chromatin and beyond: the multitasking roles for SIRT6. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014;39:72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kaidi A, Weinert BT, Choudhary C, Jackson SP. Human SIRT6 promotes DNA end resection through CtIP deacetylation. Science. 2010;329:1348–53. doi: 10.1126/science.1192049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 16.Kawahara TL, Michishita E, Adler AS, Damian M, Berber E, Lin M, McCord RA, Ongaigui KC, Boxer LD, Chang HY, et al. SIRT6 links histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylation to NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression and organismal life span. Cell. 2009;136:62–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mao Z, Hine C, Tian X, Van Meter M, Au M, Vaidya A, Seluanov A, Gorbunova V. SIRT6 promotes DNA repair under stress by activating PARP1. Science. 2011;332:1443–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1202723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McCord RA, Michishita E, Hong T, Berber E, Boxer LD, Kusumoto R, Guan S, Shi X, Gozani O, Burlingame AL, et al. SIRT6 stabilizes DNA-dependent protein kinase at chromatin for DNA double-strand break repair. Aging (Albany NY) 2009;1:109–21. doi: 10.18632/aging.100011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Michishita E, McCord RA, Berber E, Kioi M, Padilla-Nash H, Damian M, Cheung P, Kusumoto R, Kawahara TL, Barrett JC, et al. SIRT6 is a histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylase that modulates telomeric chromatin. Nature. 2008;452:492–6. doi: 10.1038/nature06736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Michishita E, McCord RA, Boxer LD, Barber MF, Hong T, Gozani O, Chua KF. Cell cycle-dependent deacetylation of telomeric histone H3 lysine K56 by human SIRT6. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:2664–6. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.16.9367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mostoslavsky R, Chua KF, Lombard DB, Pang WW, Fischer MR, Gellon L, Liu P, Mostoslavsky G, Franco S, Murphy MM, et al. Genomic instability and aging-like phenotype in the absence of mammalian SIRT6. Cell. 2006;124:315–29. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ohn T, Anderson P. The role of posttranslational modifications in the assembly of stress granules. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2010;1:486–93. doi: 10.1002/wrna.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Frye RA. Phylogenetic classification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic Sir2-like proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;273:793–8. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tissenbaum HA, Guarente L. Increased dosage of a sir-2 gene extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2001;410:227–30. doi: 10.1038/35065638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jedrusik MA, Schulze E. Telomeric position effect variegation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Caenorhabditis elegans linker histones suggests a mechanistic connection between germ line and telomeric silencing. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:3681–91. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.10.3681-3691.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wirth M, Karaca S, Wenzel D, Ho L, Tishkoff D, Lombard DB, Verdin E, Urlaub H, Jedrusik-Bode M, Fischle W. Mitochondrial SIRT4-type proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans and mammals interact with pyruvate carboxylase and other acetylated biotin-dependent carboxylases. Mitochondrion. 2013;13:705–20. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2013.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jedrusik-Bode M, Studencka M, Smolka C, Baumann T, Schmidt H, Kampf J, Paap F, Martin S, Tazi J, Müller KM, et al. The sirtuin SIRT6 regulates stress granule formation in C. elegans and mammals. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:5166–77. doi: 10.1242/jcs.130708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chiang W-C, Tishkoff DX, Yang B, Wilson-Grady J, Yu X, Mazer T, Eckersdorff M, Gygi SP, Lombard DB, Hsu A-L. C. elegans SIRT6/7 homolog SIR-2.4 promotes DAF-16 relocalization and function during stress. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pitt JN, Schisa JA, Priess JR. P granules in the germ cells of Caenorhabditis elegans adults are associated with clusters of nuclear pores and contain RNA. Dev Biol. 2000;219:315–33. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tourrière H, Chebli K, Zekri L, Courselaud B, Blanchard JM, Bertrand E, Tazi J. The RasGAP-associated endoribonuclease G3BP assembles stress granules. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:823–31. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200212128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 31.Jiang H, Khan S, Wang Y, Charron G, He B, Sebastian C, Du J, Kim R, Ge E, Mostoslavsky R, et al. SIRT6 regulates TNF-α secretion through hydrolysis of long-chain fatty acyl lysine. Nature. 2013;496:110–3. doi: 10.1038/nature12038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pan PW, Feldman JL, Devries MK, Dong A, Edwards AM, Denu JM. Structure and biochemical functions of SIRT6. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:14575–87. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.218990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Narayanaswamy R, Levy M, Tsechansky M, Stovall GM, O’Connell JD, Mirrielees J, Ellington AD, Marcotte EM. Widespread reorganization of metabolic enzymes into reversible assemblies upon nutrient starvation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:10147–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812771106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thomas MG, Loschi M, Desbats MA, Boccaccio GL. RNA granules: the good, the bad and the ugly. Cell Signal. 2011;23:324–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Erickson SL, Lykke-Andersen J. Cytoplasmic mRNP granules at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:293–7. doi: 10.1242/jcs.072140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Worm are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES