Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
. 2014 Aug 29;45(2):707–711. doi: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000200046

Occurrence of Mycobacterium bovis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in raw and pasteurized milk in the northwestern region of Paraná, Brazil

Sônia Aparecida Sgarioni 1, Rosario Dominguez Crespo Hirata 2, Mario Hiroyuki Hirata 2, Clarice Queico Fujimura Leite 3, Karina Andrade de Prince 3, Sergio Roberto de Andrade Leite 4, Dirceu Vedovello Filho 5, Vera Lucia Dias Siqueira 1, Katiany Rizzieri Caleffi-Ferracioli 1, Rosilene Fressatti Cardoso 1,
PMCID: PMC4166303  PMID: 25242962

Abstract

Milk is widely consumed in Brazil and can be the vehicle of agent transmission. In this study, was evaluated the occurrence of Mycobacterium bovis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in raw and pasteurized milk consumed in the northwestern region of Paraná, Brazil. Fifty-two milk samples (20 pasteurized and 32 raw) from dairy farms near the municipality of Maringa, Parana State, Brazil were collected. Milk samples were decontaminated using 5% oxalic acid method and cultured on Lowenstein-Jensen and Stonebrink media at 35 °C and 30 °C, with and without 5–10% CO2. Mycobacteria isolates were identified by morphological features, PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis (PCR-PRA) and Mycolic acids analysis. Thirteen (25%) raw and 2 (4%) pasteurized milk samples were positive for acid fast bacilli growth. Nine different species of NTM were isolated (M. nonchromogenicum, M. peregrinum, M. smegmatis, M. neoaurum, M. fortuitum, M. chelonae, M. flavescens, M. kansasii and M. scrofulaceum). M. bovis was not detected. Raw and pasteurized milk may be considered one source for NTM human infection. The paper reinforces the need for intensification of measures in order to avoid the milk contamination and consequently prevent diseases in the south of Brazil.

Keywords: non-tuberculous mycobacteria, milk, Mycobacterium, PCR-PRA, mycolic acids analysis

Introduction

Milk is considered a potential vehicle for transmission of some organisms which may be pathogenic for humans. External interferences in the temperature of pasteurization, extreme bacterial load contamination during milking and bottling process may favor the survival of some species of bacteria including pathogenic or facultative pathogenic mycobacteria (Donaghy et al., 2007; Leite et al., 2003).

Some species of mycobacteria, such as Mycobacterium bovis and non-tuberculosus mycobacteria (NTM), are zoonotic agents with a wide range of mammalian hosts (Konuk et al., 2007). In the past, M. bovis was a significant cause of human tuberculosis (TB) mainly in children (Thoen et al., 2006). Pasteurization of milk and dairy products dropped the disease rate drastically. Although, in developed countries, bovine tuberculosis has been considered under control, the re-emergence of the disease has been reported (Rowe and Donaghy, 2008; Thoen et al., 2006).

According to Cosivi et al. (1998), M. bovis should be considered a problem of human public health considering its involvement in 2% pulmonary and 8% extrapulmonary TB cases in Latin America. Meantime, TB incidence caused by M. bovis in humans is difficult to investigate due to the TB laboratory diagnosis is based on acid-fast staining and culture in Lowenstein-Jensen medium (LJ), which does not promote M. bovis growth (Leite et al., 2003).

NTM are ubiquitous organisms and were believed to represent environmental contamination. Recently, these organisms have been recognized a significant cause of infection in both immunocompetent (Bodle et al., 2008; Dailloux et al., 2006) and immunocompromised humans mainly with the emergence of HIV/AIDS (Falkinham, 1996; Konuk et al., 2007). In AIDS patients, the NTM had a direct impact on the picture of the mycobacterial disease. In these patients and other immunodeficient individuals mycobacterial disease is usually disseminated (Falkinham, 1996) and may cause death in few weeks.

NTM species may be transmitted to humans from the environment, such as ingestion of contaminated food (Pardo et al., 2001), water, fruit, vegetable and milk (Konuk et al., 2007). There is no evidence that these organisms are transmitted person-to-person (Schlossberg, 2006).

Several recent reports have suggested the incidence of NTM disease is increasing in many countries, as in Taiwan (Chih-Cheng et al., 2010), Canada (Marras et al., 2007), England, Wales and Northern Ireland (Moore et al., 2010). In 2009, an outbreak of subcutaneous abscesses due to M. abscessus was detected in Spain which affected healthy women who had undergone mesotherapy procedures in an aesthetic clinic (Galmés-Truyols et al., 2011). In Brazil, outbreak of postoperative infections by NTM have been recognized in some regions (Macedo and Henriques, 2009) and characterized as a public health problem (Fontana, 2008).

In south of Brazil, the state of Parana had an increased number of notified cases of rapidly growing mycobacteria in the period 1998–2009, especially the species M. abscessus subsp bolletti which represented 19.8% of cases of infection associated with invasive procedures (Brasil, 2011).

The emergence of NTM, as significant environmental pathogens, has attracted more attention (Brasil, 2011; Moore et al., 2010). Investigations on NTM transmission sources and mechanisms would contribute for better epidemiological understanding of disease caused by these mycobacteria. Some works show that animal products such as milk, seem to be reservoirs of mycobacteria and may pose a risk to the public (Carvalho et al., 2009).

In Brazil, M. kansasii, M. simiae and M. lentiflavum has been isolated from buffalo raw milk (Jordão Jr. et al., 2009) and M. avium subspecies paratuberculosis was detected in 3.6% of the bovine milk in the Minas Gerais State, Brazil (Carvalho et al., 2009).

The objective of the present study was to detect the occurrence of M. bovis and NTM in raw and pasteurized milk consumed in the northwestern region of Paraná, Brazil and to identify them by morphological features, mycolic acid analysis and PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis (PCR-PRA) of hsp65 gene.

Materials and Methods

Milk samples collection

A total of 52 milk samples (32 raw and 20 pasteurized) were cultured for M. bovis and non-tuberculous mycobacteria. M. avium subspecie paratuberculosis was not included in the research. The raw milk samples were collected directly from different dairy farms and the pasteurized milk, belonging to eighteen commercial brands was randomly sampled in supermarket chains. The milks were collected in autumn months (from April to May) in the region of Maringa, state of Parana, Brazil. Samples were obtained under aseptic conditions. All samples were transported to the laboratory, in ice box, for pretreatment and culture on the same day of sampling.

Milk samples cultures

After homogenization, milk samples (5 mL) were submitted to 5% oxalic acid decontamination process (Leite et al., 2003) and centrifuged at 3.000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. A 200 μL aliquot of each decontaminated sample were seeded onto LJ (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) and Stonebrink medium (Stonebrink et al., 1969). Cultures were incubated at 35 °C with and without 5–10% CO2 and at 30 °C in normal atmosphere for up to 3 months, and inspected weekly for mycobacterial growth Stonebrink and LJ (Kent and Kubica, 1985; Leite et al., 1998). All colonies that suggested growth of mycobacteria were stained for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and examined under an optic microscope.

Identification of mycobacterial species

All AFB colonies were initially identified by conventional methods (rate growth, colonial morphology, pigment production) (Kent and Kubica, 1985). Identification by mycolic acid analysis was carried out by one dimensional thin layer chromatography (TLC) according to Leite et al. (1998).

Molecular identification of the mycobateria isolates was carried out by PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis (PCR-PRA) (Telenti et al., 1993). Mycobacteria DNA was extracted as described by Bollela et al. (1999). Briefly, a loop full of fresh LJ-culture was suspended in 1 mL of distilled water, boiled for 10 min and placed at −20 °C for 10 min. This procedure was repeated three times and then centrifuged 5 min at 12,000 g. The supernatant was used for PCR amplification.

PCR was based on the amplification of a 439 bp segment of the hsp65 gene using the primers Tb11 (5′-ACC AAC GAT GGT GTG TCC AT-3′) and Tb12 (5′-CTT GTC GAA CCG CAT ACC CT-3′). PCR assays used 5 μL of DNA in 20 μL of the reaction mixture containing 0.5 μM of each primer (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. Coralville, USA) and PCR Master Mix (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), according to manufacturer’s instruction. DNA amplification was carried out in an Eppendorf thermocycler (Mastercycler® gradient PCR, Hamburg, Germany) using conventional amplification with an initial cycle of 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 45 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 60 °C and 1 min at 72 °C, and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C (Telenti et al., 1993).

PCR product was digested with 10 U BstEII (Boehringer Mannhein., Germany) and HaeIII (Invitrogen TM, CA, the USA) endonucleases. Restriction fragments were separated by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis in TBE buffer (0.45 mM Tris-HCl, 0.45 mM boric acid, 2.5 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) for 1 hour at 100 V. DNA ladders (50 bp and 25 bp) (Invitrogen life technologies, São Paulo, Brazil) were used as molecular markers. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide, visualized under ultraviolet light and photodocumented with a Power Shot S215 Digital camera (Cannon, NY, USA). Restriction fragments were analyzed using the PRA site (http://app.chuv.ch/prasite/index.html) and results were compared with those previously described (Brunello et al., 2001; Devallois et al., 1997; Telenti et al., 1993).

Statistical analysis

Occurrence of mycobacteria in raw and pasteurized milk samples was compared with chi-square test. Differences with p-value lower than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

A total of 15 milk samples (28.8%) were contaminated with NTM (Table 1). The occurrence of mycobacteria in raw samples (25.0%) was higher than in pasteurized ones (3.8%, p = 0.039).

Table 1.

Occurence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in milk samples in south of Brazil.

Samples Positive Negative Total p
Raw 40.6% (13/32) 59.4% (19/32) 615% (32/52)
Pasteurized 10% (2/20) 90% (18/20) 385% (20/52) p = 0039a
Total 288% (15/52) 712% (37/52) 1000% (52)
a

p < 005, chi-square test.

Nine different NTM were isolated and identified by rate growth, colonial morphology, pigment production, mycolic acid analysis and PCR-PRA from 15 milk samples. Five milk samples (four raw and one pasteurized) were positive for two different species of NTM in each sample (Table 2). No slow-grower mycobacteria from the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (M. bovis) were isolated.

Table 2.

Identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from milk samples according to Mycolic acid analysis and PCR-PRA patterns.

Samples Tests Species

Mycolic acid PRAa BstEII HaeIII
Raw I, III, IV 235/130/85 130/105 M kansasii type2
Raw I, IV, VI 235/115/85 145/60/55 M nonchromogenicum type 1
Raw I, IV, VI 320/115 145/60/55 M nonchromogenicum type 2
Raw I, IV, VI 440 150/85/55 M flavescens type 3
Raw I, IV, VI 440 150/90/60 M flavescens type 3
Raw I, IV, VI 320/115 170/140 M neoaurum type 1
I, IV, VI 320/115 145/60/55 M nonchromogenicum type 2
Raw I, IV, VI 440 150/90/60 M flavescens type 3
I, IV, VI 235/210 145/130/95 M scrofulaceum type 1
Raw I, V 235/210 145/140/100/55 M peregrinum type 1
Raw I, V 235/130/85 145/125/60 M smegmatis type 1
Raw I, V 235/130/85 145/125/60 M smegmatis type 1
Raw I, V 235/130/85 145/125/60 M smegmatis type 1
I, IV, VI 320/115 145/60/55 M nonchromogenicum type 2
Raw I, V 235/115/85 145/120/60/55 M fortuitum type 1
I, V 235/210 145/120/100/55 M peregrinum type 2
Raw I, VI 320/115 145/60/55 M nonchromogenicum type 2
Pasteurized I, V 235/210 140/120/100 M peregrinum type 2
Pasteurized I, V 235/210 145/120/100/55 M peregrinum type 2
I, II 320/130 200/60/55 M chelonae type 1
a

PRA, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis.

The most frequent NTM found in milk samples were M. nonchromogenicum (25.0%, 5/20 isolates), M. peregrinum (20.0%, 4/20 isolates) and Mycobacterium smegmatis (15.0%, 3/20 isolates) (Table 2). M. nonchromogenicum and M. smegmatis were isolated only from raw samples, while M. peregrinum was isolated from two raw and two pasteurized samples.

Discussion

The current study contributed towards demonstrating the diversity of mycobacteria species in milk from farms in Maringa, state of Parana, southern Brazil. The results are relevant since approximately 50% or more of all milk consumed in Brazil is not pasteurized (Leite et al., 2003) and specifically a section of the population of the town around Maringa drinks raw milk and uses raw dairy products.

Considering the importance of bovine tuberculosis for the public health and that no data is available about the prevalence of M. bovis in local cattle herds or disease caused by this Mycobacterium species in human, the milk samples were cultured for M. bovis in Stonebrink medium. M. bovis was not detected in the present study; however, we consider the number of samples is too few to draw a conclusion about tuberculosis in local dairy cows. Meantime, considerable number of NTM was cultured from raw and pasteurized milk samples in LJ and Stonebrink media at 30 ºC and 35 °C.

NTM were detected in raw and pasteurized milk in another study undertaken in the State of São Paulo, Brazil (Leite et al., 2003) and included M. fortuitum, M. marinum, M. kansasii, M. gordonae and some unidentified rapidly growing mycobacteria. In a similar study, in Turkey, four NTM species (M. terrae, M. kansasii, M. haemophilum and M. agri) were isolated from raw milk (Konukt et al., 2007).

It should be emphasized in the present study that some of NTM isolated in milk samples (M. fortuitum, M. chelonae, M. kansasii, M. scrofulaceum) are potential pathogens and may cause a variety of manifestation in humans undergoing immune system suppression (Saad et al., 1997, Wolinsky et al., 1992). In a National surveillance, M. kansasii (13.7%) and M. fortuitum (10.8%) together with M. avium (44.1%) were the mainly NTM isolated in culture from patients with mycobacteriosis (Barreto and Campos, 2000).

Although it has been established that pasteurization kills M. tuberculosis in milk, survival of some nontuberculous Mycobacterium species after simulated laboratory pasteurization has been reported (Grant et al., 1996). For example, M. kansasii isolated in raw milk, in this study, are among those mycobacteria extensively found in Brazilian environment, including water systems (Falcão et al., 1993) and can survive the pasteurization (63.5 °C for 30 min) (Grant et al., 1996).

M. peregrinum and M. chelonae were the two NTM detected in pasteurized milk. The detection of the mycobacteria in pasteurized milk may be explained by extreme bacterial load contamination during milking and bottling process (Grant et al., 1996; Leite et al., 2003) or the formation of mycobactera biofilm by incorrect maintenance of the equipment used in pasteurization process. According to Grant et al. (1996), clumping of the mycobacteria cells during heating or an increase of resistance by a non understood mechanism, may be responsible for surviving the pasteurization.

In conclusion, consumption of raw milk remains a risk factor for exposure to the NTM. The implementation of measures that prevent milk contamination during and post milking with NTM are needed to avoid diseases, which is relevant mainly for patients with immunological disorders.

References

  1. Barreto AMW, Campos CED. Micobactérias “não tuberculosas” no Brasil. Bol Pneumol Sanit. 2000;8:23–31. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bodle EE, Cunningham JA, Della-Latta P, Schluger NW, Saiman L. Epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacteria in patients without HIV infection, New York City. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(3):390–396. doi: 10.3201/eid1403.061143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bollela VR, Sato DN, Fonseca BA. Problems in the standardization of the polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Rev Saúde Públ. 1999;33:281–286. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89101999000300009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Relatório descrito de investigação de casos de Infecções por Micobactérias não tuberculosas de crescimento rápido (MCR) no Brasil no período de 1998–2009. [accessed 29 July 2011];2011 Available at: http://portalanvisa gov br.
  5. Brunello F, Ligozzi M, Cristelli E, Bonara S, Tortoli E, Fontana R. Identification of 54 mycobacterial species by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the hsp65 gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:2799–2806. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2799-2806.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carvalho A, Silva A, Jr, Campos VEB, Moreira MAS. Short communication: Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction in bovine milk in Brazil. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:5408–5410. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chih-Cheng L, Che-Kim T, Chien-Hong C, Hsiao-Leng H, Chun-Hsing L, Yu-Tsung H, Pan-Chyr Y, Kwen-Tay L, Po-Ren H. Increasing Incidence of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria, Taiwan, 2000–2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(2):294–296. doi: 10.3201/eid1602.090675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cosivi O, Grange JM, Daborn MC, Raviglione MC, Fujikura T, Cousins D, Robinson RA, Huchzermeyer HFAK, Kantor E, Meslin FX. Zoonotic Tuberculosis due to Mycobacterium bovis in Developing Countries. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4(1):59–70. doi: 10.3201/eid0401.980108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dailloux M, Abalain ML, Laurain C, Lebrun L, Loos-Ayav C, Lozniewski A, Maugein J. Respiratory infections associated with nontuberculous mycobacteria in non-HIV patients. Eur Respir J. 2006;28:1211–1215. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00063806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Devallois A, Goh KS, Rastogi N. Rapid Identificatiom of mycobacteria to species level by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of hsp65 gene and proposition of an algorithm to differentiate 34 mycobacterial species. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2969–2973. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.11.2969-2973.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Donaghy JA, Linton M, Patterson MF, Rowe MT. Effect of high pressure and pasteurization on Mycobacterium avium ssp paratuberculosis in milk. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2007;45(2):154–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Falcão DP, Valentini SR, Leite CQF. Pathogenic or potentially pathogenic bacteria as contaminants of fresh water from different sources in Araraquara, Brazil. Water Res. 1993;27:1737–1741. [Google Scholar]
  13. Falkinham JO. Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:177–215. doi: 10.1128/cmr.9.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fontana RT. As Micobactérias de crescimento rápido e a Infecção hospitalar: um problema de saúde pública. Rev Bras Enferm. 2008;61(3):371–376. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672008000300016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Galmés-Truyols A, Giménez-Duran J, Bosch-Isabel C, Nicolau-Riutort A, Vanrell-Berga J, Portell-Arbona M, Seguí-Prat B, Gumá-Torá M, Martí-Alomar I, Rojo-Arias MA, Ruiz-Veramendi M. An outbreak of cutaneous infection due to Mycobacterium abscessus associated to mesotherapy. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2011;29(7):510–514. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grant IR, Ball HJ, Rowe MT. Thermal inactivation of several Mycobacterium spp in milk by pasteurization. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1996;22:253–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1996.tb01154.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jordão CM, Junior, Lopes FCM, David S, Farache Filho A, Leite CQF. Detection of nontuberculous mycobacteria from water buffalo raw milk in Brazil. Food Microbiol. 2009;26:658–61. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2009.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kent PT, Kubica GP. Public Health Mycobacteriology A Guide for the Level III Laboratory Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Departament of Health and Human Services; Atlanta, Georgia, US: 1985. [Google Scholar]
  19. Konuk M, Korcan E, Dülgerbak S, Altindis M. Isolation and identification of Mycobacteria from raw milk samples in Afyonkarahisar district of Turkey. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;115:343–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Leite CQF, Souza CWO, Leite SRA. Identification of mycobacteria by thin layer chromatographic analysis of mycolic acids and conventional biochemical method: four years of experience. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1998;93:801–805. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761998000600019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Leite CQF, Anno IS, Leite SRA, Roxo E, Morlock GP, Cooksey RC. Isolation and identification of Mycobacteria from Livestock Specimens and Milk Obtained in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003;98:319–323. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762003000300005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Macedo JLS, Henriques CMP. Infecções pós-operatórias por micobactérias de crescimento rápido no Brasil. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2009;24(4):544–551. [Google Scholar]
  23. Marras TK, Chedore P, Ying AM, Jamieson F. Isolation prevalence of pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacteria in Ontario, 1997–2003. Thorax. 2007;62:661–666. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.070797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moore JE, Kruijshaar ME, Ormerod LP, Drobniewski F, Abubakar I. Increasing reports of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 1995–2006. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:612–617. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pardo RB, Langoni H, Mendonça LJP, Chi KD. Isolation of Mycobacterium spp in milk from cows suspected or positive to tuberculosis. Braz J Vet Res An Sci. 2001;38(6):284–287. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rowe MT, Donaghy J. Mycobacterium bovis: the importance of milk and dairy products as a cause of human tuberculosis in the UK A review of taxonomy and culture methods, with particular reference to artisanal cheeses. Int J Dairy Technol. 2008;61(4):317–326. [Google Scholar]
  27. Saad MHF, Vicent V, Dawson DJ, Palaci M, Ferrazoli L, Fonseca LS. Analysis of Mycobacterium avium Complex serovars isolated from AIDS patients from Southeast Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1997;92(4):471–475. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761997000400004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schlossberg D. Tuberculosis & Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections. McGraw-Hill Professional; New York: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  29. Stonebrink B, Duoma J, Manten A, Mulder RJ. A comparative investigation on the quality of various culture media as used in the Netherlands for the isolation of mycobacteria. Selected Papers (The Hague) 1969;12:45–47. [Google Scholar]
  30. Telenti A, Marchesi F, Balz M, Bally F, Bottger EC, Bodner T. Rapid Identification of Mycobacteria to the Species level by Polymerase Chain Reaction and restriction Enzyme Analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31(2):175–178. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.175-178.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thoen C, Lobue P, Kantor I. The importance of Mycobacterium bovis as a zoonosis. Vet Microbiol. 2006;112:339–345. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.11.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wolinsky E. Mycobacterial diseases other than tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15:1–12. doi: 10.1093/clinids/15.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Microbiology

RESOURCES