Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine logoLink to Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine
letter
. 2014 Sep;18(9):639–640. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.140161

Nosocomial candiduria in chronic liver disease patients at a hepatobilliary center

Armin Ahmed 1,, Afzal Azim 1, Mohan Gurjar 1, Arvind Kumar Baronia 1
PMCID: PMC4166884  PMID: 25249753

Sir,

We read the article “Nosocomial candiduria in chronic liver disease patients at a hepatobiliary center”[1] with great interest. This article clearly highlights the importance of repeat sampling in patients who are reported as having candiduria. Candiduria can occur due to contamination, colonization (of the indwelling catheter or bladder), and infection (Candida cystitis or ascending pyelonephritis or renal candidiasis) as discussed in this article. Taking a repeat sample after insertion of fresh catheter eliminates the chances of contamination, but colonization can still be present without any clinical manifestation of disease.[2,3]

Differentiation between the colonization and infection is difficult one and should be interpreted in the light of clinical features. Frequently, due to the presence of multiple co morbidities the line of demarcation between Candida colonization and infection is blurred, more so in critically ill patients.

Pathogenesis of urinary tract and renal infections caused by Candida involves hematogenous spread as well ascending infection. When suspecting hematogenous spread various risk prediction scores (colonization index, Candida score) have been designed to guide therapy.[3,4] Candida colonization has been shown to be a risk factor for invasive candidiasis, but multiple site colonization and heavy colonization is considered more significant than single site colonization.[5] Candiduria represents single site colonization and should not trigger initiation of treatment unless other symptoms are also present. When suspecting ascending infection, one should look for predisposing factors like presence of stone or presence of obstruction, urinary drainage devices, prior surgical procedures, broad spectrum antibiotic use, old age, and diabetes mellitus.

Infectious Disease Society of America 2009 guidelines recommends that asymptomatic candiduria should not be treated unless the patient is at high risk of invasive candidiasis (neutropenia, low birth weight, and patients who undergo urologic procedures).[6] The reason for treating asymptomatic candiduria in high risk patients is mainly prophylaxis.

Chronic liver disease is a very broad terminology and includes various etiologies and stages of evolution in its natural history. Whether all chronic liver disease patients should be included in the high risk remains to be established. Currently, there is a paucity of literature regarding predisposition for invasive Candida infections among chronic liver disease patients. It would have been enlightening if the patient characteristics and stages/classification of liver disease were also mentioned in this study.

The study also reports that 11 (3.5%) patients of candiduria evolved to candidemia. Though it is difficult to perform, genotypic identification is ideally required before one can say that species colonizing is the same as the species responsible for blood stream infection.

References

  • 1.Rathor N, Khillan V, Sarin SK. Nosocomial candiduria in chronic liver disease patients at a hepatobilliary center. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18:234–7. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.130575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fisher JF, Kavanagh K, Sobel JD, Kauffman CA, Newman CA. Candida urinary tract infection: pathogenesis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(Suppl 6):S437–51. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pittet D, Monod M, Suter PM, Frenk E, Auckenthaler R. Candida colonization and subsequent infections in critically ill surgical patients. Ann Surg. 1994;220:751–8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199412000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.León C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, Almirante B, Nolla-Salas J, Alvarez-Lerma F, et al. A bedside scoring system ("Candida score") for early antifungal treatment in nonneutropenic critically ill patients with Candida colonization. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:730–7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000202208.37364.7D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.León C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, Galván B, Blanco A, Castro C, et al. Usefulness of the “Candida score” for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: A prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1624–33. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819daa14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK, Jr, Calandra TF, Edwards JE, Jr, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:503–35. doi: 10.1086/596757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine are provided here courtesy of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine

RESOURCES