Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2014 Mar 18;23(11):1314–1317. doi: 10.1002/pon.3527

Barriers to physical activity among African American breast cancer survivors

Gideon Oyekanmi 1,2, Raheem J Paxton 3,*
PMCID: PMC4167984  NIHMSID: NIHMS586354  PMID: 24644092

Dear Editor,

Introduction

African American (AA) breast cancer survivors (BCSs) have high rates of overweight/obesity, comorbid conditions, and deficits in functional status that may contribute to poor cancer-specific and overall survival rates [1,2]. Participating in regular physical activity (PA) has tangible benefits, including weight maintenance, improvements in quality of life, functional status, and reductions in fatigue and nausea [3]. PA is also associated with a reduction in cancer recurrence and improvements in overall survival [4]. Despite the benefits associated with PA, many AA BCSs do not meet the guidelines for PA (i.e., 150 min of moderate to vigorous PA/week) [2].

African American BCSs’ failure to meet PA guidelines may be due to barriers that prevent them from being active. However, limited data exist on the barriers to PA in this population. Common barriers observed in these studies included pain, fatigue, lack of social support, lack of discipline, and safety concerns [57]. Although these studies provided important data, the sample sizes were very small. Additional studies are needed, which examine the barriers to PA in a large sample of AA BCSs; such studies will enable subgroup comparisons and provide meaningful data on what subgroups are in the greatest need of intervention. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to characterize the PA barriers of AA BCSs and determine whether the barriers to PA differed in various subpopulations. The present study builds off a previous study that assessed the lifestyle behavior of 470 AA BCSs affiliated with the Sisters Network.

Methods and materials

Study population

African American BCSs from the Sisters Network Inc., a national organization (44 chapters) of AA BCSs, participated in this needs assessment survey. The methods describing the recruitment methods were described elsewhere [2]. A total of 273 out of the 475 BCSs who initiated our Web-based survey are described here. Eligibility criteria included a previous breast cancer diagnosis, staged I to IIIC, and between 18 and 80 years old. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to data collection.

Measures

Physical activity barriers

Participants were encouraged to rate barriers to PA on a five-point Likert-type response scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very often) [8]. The 15-item barrier to PA inventory consisted of items related to environmental (e.g., equipment, weather), personal (e.g., energy/fatigue), and social (e.g., company) factors. Each barrier was evaluated individually, rather than collapsed in collective sub-scales. The internal consistency reliability for the measure was α = 0.92.

Physical activity

Physical activity was assessed via a self-administered instrument designed for the Women's Health Initiative [9]. PA was calculated separately for light metabolic equivalent of task (MET level <3.0), moderate (MET level 3.0–5.9), and vigorous (MET level ≥6.0) activities. We also generated a variable to account for moderate to vigorous PA (MET level ≥3.0). This dichotomous variable (‘meeting or not meeting PA guidelines’) determined whether women were exercising approximately 150 min per week, consistent with recommended levels.

Other items

Participants’ self-reported height and weight were used to compute their body mass index (kg/m2). Body mass index risk categories (normal/overweigh versus obese) were used to distinguish women. Participants also self-reported sociodemographic and medical data.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the medical and sociodemographic characteristics. Next, a series of paired t-tests were used to determine whether mean differences in PA barriers existed by age group, years since diagnosis, obesity status, and education level. Finally, an adjusted logistic regression model was used to evaluate the relationship between meeting current guidelines for PA and each PA barrier, adjusting for covariates (i.e., age, number of comorbidities, education, stage at cancer diagnosis, years out from diagnosis, and body mass index). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were computed. All statistical tests were two-sided and statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics

The mean age of the participants was 54 years, and the mean time since diagnosis was 7 years. Many (66%) women were diagnosed at stages II or greater. About 78% of the participants were married, and about 50% of them had at least a college education. Many women reported hypertension (50%), hyperlipidemia (30%), and diabetes (30%). Approximately, 48% of the participants were obese and less than half (44.6%) were meeting PA guidelines. The most commonly reported barriers to PA were a lack of discipline (43.8%), time (32.4%), energy (34.1%), interest (28.2%), and good health (17.9%).

Participant characteristics and barriers

Younger women reported significantly higher mean scores for having a lack of time and energy than did older women (all p < 0.05, Table 1). Non-college-educated women reported significantly higher mean scores for feeling discouraged and having a fear of injury, and a lack of company, equipment, facilities or space, knowledge of how to exercise, good health, and energy than did college-educated women (all p < 0.05). Obese women reported significantly higher mean scores for feeling discouraged and having a lack of facilities or space (all p < 0.05). No significant mean differences were observed with regard to disease stage at diagnosis (data not shown) or time since diagnosis (all p > 0.05).

Table 1.

Barriers to physical activity by sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics

Age group N = 273
Body size N = 273
Education N = 270
Reported barriers <55 years M (SD) >55 years M (SD) p-value Non-obese M (SD) Obese M (SD) p-value Non-college graduates M (SD) College graduates M (SD) p-value
Lack of interest in exercising 2.7 (1.2) 2.9 (1.3) 0.21 2.7 (1.3) 2.9 (1.2) 0.28 2.9 (1.3) 2.7 (1.3) 0.18
Lack of self-discipline 3.1 (1.3) 3.2 (1.3) 0.93 3.0 (1.3) 3.3 (1.2) 0.12 3.2 (1.3) 3.1 (1.2) 0.41
Lack of time 3.1 (1.2) 2.7 (1.2) 0.01 2.9 (1.3) 3.0 (1.1) 0.60 2.9 (1.2) 3.0 (1.2) 0.44
Lack of energy 3.3 (1.2) 2.8 (1.1) 0.00 3.0 (1.2) 3.2 (1.2) 0.13 3.2 (1.2) 3.0 (1.2) 0.23
Lack of company 2.3 (1.3) 2.2 (1.2) 0.58 2.2 (1.3) 2.3 (1.2) 0.46 2.5 (1.3) 2.0 (1.2) 0.00
Lack of enjoyment 2.3 (1.2) 2.5 (1.1) 0.13 2.3 (1.2) 2.5 (1.1) 0.21 2.5 (1.2) 2.3 (1.1) 0.08
Discouragement 2.2 (1.3) 2.3 (1.2) 0.86 2.0 (1.1) 2.5 (1.3) 0.00 2.4 (1.3) 2.1 (1.1) 0.04
Lack of equipment 2.1 (1.3) 2.1 (1.2) 0.73 2.0 (1.2) 2.2 (1.3) 0.19 2.3 (1.3) 1.9 (1.1) 0.00
Lack of good weather 2.2 (1.0) 2.3 (1.1) 0.57 2.2 (1.0) 2.3 (1.1) 0.51 2.4 (1.1) 2.1 (1.0) 0.08
Lack of skills 2.0 (1.1) 2.0 (1.0) 0.77 1.9 (1.0) 2.1 (1.1) 0.16 2.1 (1.2) 1.8 (1.0) 0.02
Lack of facilities or space 2.0 (1.2) 2.0 (1.2) 0.94 1.9 (1.1) 2.2 (1.3) 0.04 2.2 (1.4) 1.8 (1.0) 0.01
Lack of knowledge of how to exercise 2.1 (1.2) 2.0 (1.1) 0.66 2.0 (1.1) 2.1 (1.3) 0.24 2.2 (1.3) 2.0 (1.0) 0.03
Lack of good health 2.5 (1.3) 2.3 (1.2) 0.18 2.3 (1.2) 2.5 (1.3) 0.18 2.5 (1.3) 2.2 (1.2) 0.04
Fear of injury 1.9 (1.2) 1.8 (1.0) 0.45 1.7 (1.0) 2.0 (1.2) 0.06 2.0 (1.3) 1.7 (1.0) 0.03

Higher mean scores indicate that the subgroups in question had a higher risk for encountering certain barriers. The response options ranged from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very often).

Meeting guidelines to physical activity and barriers

In adjusted models, women who were not meeting guidelines for PA were more likely than women who were meeting guidelines for PA to report the following barriers: lack of interest in exercise (OR = 6.8), lack of self-discipline (OR = 3.9), lack of time (OR = 3.6), fear of injury (OR = 3.3), and lack of company (OR = 3.1). The remaining associations between meeting not meeting guidelines and PA barriers are reported in Table 2.

Table 2.

Odds associated with not meeting current guidelines to physical activity and perceiving barriers to physical activity

% experiencing barrier often or very often Odds ratio 95% confidence interval
Lack of interest in exercising 60 6.8 3.8, 12.2
Lack of self-discipline 72 3.9 2.2, 7.1
Lack of time 64 2.1 1.2, 3.7
Lack of energy 71 2.5 1.4, 4.6
Lack of company 37 3.6 2.0, 6.5
Lack of enjoyment 47 3.1 1.8, 5.4
Discouragement 37 2.4 1.4, 4.3
Lack of equipment 30 2.8 1.5, 5.1
Lack of good weather 41 1.7 1.0, 3.0
Lack of skills 30 1.5 0.8, 2.6
Lack of facilities or space 30 2.2 1.2, 4.1
Lack of knowledge of how to exercise 33 2.6 1.4, 4.6
Lack of good health 43 2.8 1.6, 4.7
Fear of injury 23 3.3 1.6, 6.7

Analyses were adjusted for age, number of comorbidities, education, stage at cancer diagnosis, years out from diagnosis, and body mass index.

Discussion

In this study, we found that there are certain segments of the population that are at risk for not meeting current guidelines to PA because of specific PA barriers. In particular, women who did not receive a college education appeared to be at the greatest risk and reported the most barriers. Obesity appears to be another factor that cooccurs with substantial PA barriers. Overall, obesity and less education increase one's perception of being at risk for a specific barrier.

The most prevalent barriers to PA in the study population were a lack of discipline, energy, time, and interest. The barriers observed here were similar to those observed in previous studies of AA BCSs [57]. The lack of interest may contribute to excessive weight gain following diagnosis and further discomfort with their weight [6]. AA BCSs may not be aware of the benefits of PA when compared with other challenges. Helping them realize that regular PA will not only improve weight but also help to manage comorbid conditions, and mood may encourage them to be more active. Promoting activities that AA BCSs prefer may bolster enjoyment for PA and may enhance self-efficacy to adopt and maintain regular PA over time [10].

Fear of injury and lack of good health were barriers that may refer to barriers of pain and fatigue reported from previous studies [57]. Such concerns may co-occur with number of comorbidities, a correlate of PA in this population [2]. Interventions targeting women with injuries, a fear of injuries, or comorbidities could focus on interrupting prolonged periods of sedentary time, chair-based exercises, yoga, or stretching at home. Such strategies may build self-efficacy and gradually promote behavior change over time.

Less-educated women more prone to barriers. These data correspond to our previous study suggesting that less education was indicative of not meeting PA guidelines [2]. Lower socioeconomic is a known correlate of PA; however, PA can be acquired at little to no cost in any environment. Studies educating AA BCSs of convenient and inexpensive PA strategies are needed.

This study had several notable strengths. It is modest in size, provides data on an underrepresented population, and identifies subgroups who may be more in need of PA interventions. However, the findings of this study should be considered with awareness of its limitations. The data were self-reported with potential recall and reporting biases. In addition, the participant response rate was relatively low compared with the available pool of AA BCSs (n ~ 3800) in the Sisters Network database.

In conclusion, this study identified subgroups of AA BCSs that may be in the greatest need for intervention. These findings are similar to those observed in healthy population and will be useful for researchers and health professionals in attempting to develop lifestyle interventions in this underserved population. Given that barriers of discipline, time, and social support contribute to lower levels of PA in this population, group or family-based interventions may be warranted. Additionally, gradually reducing and interrupting prolonged periods of sedentary behavior and assisting women in the transition to a more active lifestyle may help to curb the significant comorbid conditions experienced by these women.

Key points.

  • Few AA BCSs meet current guidelines to physical activity, yet little is known about the barriers that prevent them from being active.

  • AA BCSs frequently reported barriers of lack of discipline, time, energy, interest, and good health.

  • PA barriers among AA BCSs did not differ according to time out from diagnosis or stage of diagnosis.

  • AA BCSs who were obese and less educated experienced the greatest number of physical activity barriers.

  • Lack of interest in physical activity, discipline, and support significantly increased one's risk for not meeting current guidelines to physical activity.

Acknowledgements

We thank the women of Sisters Network, Inc., for participating in our study and Scientific Publication Department at MD Anderson for editing our manuscript. We would also like to thank Ms. Kelly Hodges of the Sisters Network for playing an instrumental role in organizing the recruitment efforts. This research was supported in part by National Cancer Institute grants K01CA158000 (to R. J. P.) and by the National Institutes of Health through MD Anderson Cancer Center's Support Grant (CA016672).

Financial disclosures

The authors have no financial disclosures.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

The authors have conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Paxton RJ, et al. Associations among physical activity, body mass index, and health-related quality of life by race/ethnicity in a diverse sample of breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2012;118(16):4024–4031. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Paxton RJ, et al. Lifestyle behaviors of African American breast cancer survivors: a Sisters Network, Inc. study. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Speck RM, et al. An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2010;4(2):87–100. doi: 10.1007/s11764-009-0110-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ibrahim EM, Al-Homaidh A. Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis: meta-analysis of published studies. Med Oncol. 2011;28(3):753–765. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9536-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stolley MR, et al. Health behaviors and breast cancer: experiences of urban African American women. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33(5):604–624. doi: 10.1177/1090198106290845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Weathers B, et al. Perceptions of changes in weight among African American breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2006;15(2):174–179. doi: 10.1002/pon.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Spector D, Battaglini C, Groff D. Perceived exercise barriers and facilitators among ethnically diverse breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013;40(5):472–480. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.472-480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hovell MF, et al. Identifying correlates of walking for exercise: an epidemiologic prerequisite for physical activity promotion. Prev Med. 1989;18(6):856–866. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(89)90021-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Langer RD, et al. The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study: baseline characteristics of participants and reliability of baseline measures. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(9 Suppl):S107–S121. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(03)00047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rogers LQ, et al. Correlates of physical activity self-efficacy among breast cancer survivors. Am J Health Behav. 2008;32(6):594–603. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2008.32.6.594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES