Introduction
Gout is the commonest inflammatory arthritis in adults associated with negative effect on patient’s quality of life, worker productivity and health care utilization1,2. Despite the availability of effective and affordable treatments for lowering serum urate, i.e. urate-lowering therapy (ULT), to prevent chronic joint damage and frequent gout flares, quality care gaps characterized by under use and inadequate dosing of ULT are widely prevalent3,4. Recent qualitative studies have assessed the patient’s knowledge of gout treatments. In semi-structured interviews, patients(n=26; 80% male) reported discontinuing ULT since it triggered acute gout flares and cited concern for side effects, forgetfulness, and financial problems as reasons for non-adherence to ULT5. In a UK study, patients (n=20; 75% male) cited concern for side effects, lack of perception to take it long-term and their perception that they needed treatment only for acute attacks as the reasons to not take their ULT regularly 6. These studies provided data from a primarily Caucasian men, i.e., women and African-Americans with gout are understudied. It is not known that these findings regarding barriers are generalizable to African-Americans and women with gout. Our objective was to assess barriers to gout treatments by performing a qualitative study in patients with gout including African-Americans and women.
Patients and Methods
Outpatients seen at a community-based clinic with a diagnostic code for gout (274.xx) during 2011–2012 were invited for participation in our study that used nominal group technique (NGT), a variant of focus group methods. NGT aims at developing an inclusive list of issues related to a specific question, then soliciting feedback on the relative importance of these lists through rank-ordering procedures7–9.NGT allows an even participation from all group members with an equal weighting of their input, which makes the results representative of the groups’ implicit views. Our Institutional Review Board approved the study. We conducted three nominal groups, purposely oversampling for African-Americans and women, under-represented in gout research studies. Patients were asked to address a single question “In your opinion, what is most challenging about your gout treatment?” According to the NGT methodology, patients recorded all their responses independently on a worksheet, nominated each of these responses that were recorded on a flip chart, discussed, elaborated and consolidated responses. They then provided individual priority scores from 1 to 5 to the top five challenges (5=most important). The scores from all patients within each nominal group were aggregated into an overall score and ranked based on highest to lowest priority scores.
Results
Seventeen patients participated in three nominal groups. Mean age was 64.7 (standard deviation, 9.9), 8 were men, 9 were women, 5 Caucasian and 12 African-Americans. The top three themes in each of the three groups were: (1) Group 1: Recognizing attack had started and start taking medicine; side effects of Colcrys (colchicine); balance between managing gout and other conditions; (2) Group 2: Eating the right food and taking enough fluids; concern about medication side effects; and trouble taking gout medication due to kidney problem; and (3) Group 3: Knowing when and what to take during a gout attack; concern about interaction with other medications patients are taking; and allergic reaction or side effect to gout medication (Table 1).
Table 1.
In your opinion, what is most challenging about your gout treatment? | Priority score | Group Rank order |
---|---|---|
Nominal group 1 (68WM, 68AAF, 78AAM, 66AAM, 65WF, 60AAF, 61AAF, 60AAM; n=8) | ||
Recognizing attack had started and start taking medicine | 31 | 1 |
Side effects of Colcrys (colchicine) | 24 | 2 |
Balance between gout and other conditions (pseudogout, high blood pressure) | 17 | 3 |
We need cure, treatments are not enough | 11 | |
Discipline taking medications all the time | 9 | |
Interaction of gout medications with my other medications | 9 | |
Pain is severe (even after medications) | 7 | |
Being on a diet | 7 | |
Doing what you doctor asks you (is not easy) | 5 | |
Nominal group 2 [72AAM, 38AAF, 77AAF, 53WM; n=4) | ||
Eating right food and taking enough fluids | 14 | 1 |
Most medications that I take have side-effects on vital organs | 14 | 2 |
Medication I can’t take due to kidney problem | 10 | 3 |
Finding something to help swelling | 8 | |
Problem putting Ice/Heat-Packs on the foot | 7 | |
Trouble with sleep | 4 | |
Wearing the right type of shoe | 2 | |
Managing/taking medication every day | 1 | |
Nominal group 3 [75AAF, 60AAF, 64WM, 75WF, 60AAM; n=5) | ||
Knowing when and what to take if I am having a gout attack | 12 | 1 |
Concern about interaction of other medication with gout medications | 11 | 2 |
Allergic Reaction/side effect to gout medication | 9 | 3 |
What to eat? | 9 | 3 |
Trusting my doctor during flare-ups | 9 | 3 |
No specific meal time or bedtime, so forget taking medication sometimes | 9 | 3 |
Some days get tired of “taking pills everyday” | 6 | |
Quality of life is affected (by treatments) | 5 | |
Medication fill and adherence are challenging | 5 |
AA, African-American; C, Caucasian; M, male; F, female; top three ranked concerns in bold; In group 3, four concerns tied for the third place
Several patient quotes within these key themes illustrated patient concerns. Patients were worried about medication interactions and side effects: “How much do pharmacists and doctors know about medication interactions?” “Side effects are horrible and affect life”. Patients weren’t sure which gout medication to take everyday and which during the attack: “Do we take or not take allopurinol during gout attack?” “….need to know what each medication is supposed to do and how and when to take it?” Patients had difficulty remembering to take gout medications regularly: “Have to discipline yourself”, “Remembering to take medication, don’t want to take too much”.
Discussion
This is the first qualitative study in gout patients that describes the treatment challenges faced by a group of patients that included both African-Americans and women with gout. Our study findings add to the growing knowledge in this area. Study findings must be interpreted considering its limitations. Our sample size was small, but similar to other previous qualitative studies 5,6; and our objective was not to do a wide survey, but gain in-depth insight into this issue/question. Generalizability to other populations for a single site study may be challenging, despite our attempt to include African-Americans and women with gout. We included women and African-Americans, since most previous qualitative studies have not included African-Americans and women with gout, limiting their generalizability. One limitation of our study is that we are unable to analyze differences by age, sex etc. We plan to explore differences by these factors in our future study. Several findings deserve further discussion.
We purposefully asked the question about gout treatment and not a specific group of medications. To our surprise, all patient nominal groups identified themes related to diet and dietary modification among their top ranked concerns, signifying that gout patients considered dietary modification an integral part of their treatment. This is an important finding and very encouraging, since diet and lifestyle modification are key to gout management and have been recommended by major gout guidelines. In conjunction with finding from other studies that patients have misinformation about the types of food to avoid and take5,6,10, our study findings imply that patients need and may likely benefit from their gout providers’ advice about diet.
All three nominal groups identified concern with gout medication among their top 3 concerns, including side effects, long-term effects on vital organs and interactions with their other medications. When we further explored, patients were also worried about effect of their other medications on gout medications, indicating that the concern is bi-directional. Patients were concerned about taking their gout medications in presence of kidney problems. While this concern may be valid for medications such as colchicine and NSAIDs, ULTs such as allopurinol and febuxostat, can be used safely in patients with renal failure. Although the risk of allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome increases with higher dosing in renal failure, this side effect is rare. Both patients and physicians have unfounded fears about ULT dosing in renal failure 5,6,10, a knowledge gap that leads to under-dosing of allopurinol and needs to be addressed, if adherence to ULT is to be improved. Concerns about medication side effects is a general concern, not specific to gout, and has been reported in studies of other chronic diseases.11,12
In summary, in this study of gout patients that included African-Americans and women, we found that patients consider diet management integral to the treatment of gout and had significant concerns about medication side effects/interactions. Concerns about medication side effects, dietary modifications and concern about what to do during a gout flare were universal and a bit surprising given the low rate of side effects of gout treatments. Although it is important and necessary for providers to address patients’ focus on diet, experience indicates that many patients (and even providers) focus more on dietary factors while not realizing that ULT is the key in treating the vast majority of gout patients. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings in other populations.
Acknowledgments
I thank Bridgett Alday, Ana Oliviera and Aseem Bharat, research assistants at UAB, for help conducting the nominal groups and Mary Elkins, program manager at UAB, for the administrative oversight. I thank patients who provided informal input into drafting the question for the nominal groups.
Grant support: This material is the result of work supported by research funds from the Division of Rheumatology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and the resources and use of facilities at the Birmingham VA Medical Center, Alabama, USA. J.A.S. is also supported by grants from the Agency for Health Quality and Research Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics (CERTs), National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), National Institute of Aging (NIA) and National Cancer Institute (NCI).
Footnotes
IRB approval: The University of Alabama at Birmingham’s Institutional Review Board approved this study and all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.
Financial Conflict: There are no financial conflicts related directly to this study. J.A.S. has received research and travel grants from Takeda and Savient; and consultant fees from Savient, Takeda, Regeneron and Allergan. J.A.S. is a member of the executive of OMERACT, an organization that develops outcome measures in rheumatology and receives arms-length funding from 36 companies; a member of the American College of Rheumatology’s Guidelines Subcommittee of the Quality of Care Committee; and a member of the Veterans Affairs Rheumatology Field Advisory Committee.
References
- 1.Edwards NL, Sundy JS, Forsythe A, Blume S, Pan F, Becker MA. Work productivity loss due to flares in patients with chronic gout refractory to conventional therapy. J Med Econ. 2011;14(1):10–15. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2010.540874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Singh JA, Strand V. Gout is associated with more comorbidities, poorer health-related quality of life and higher healthcare utilisation in US veterans. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Sep;67(9):1310–1316. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.081604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sarawate CA, Brewer KK, Yang W, Patel PA, Schumacher HR, Saag KG, Bakst AW. Gout medication treatment patterns and adherence to standards of care from a managed care perspective. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Jul;81(7):925–934. doi: 10.4065/81.7.925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Singh JA, Hodges JS, Asch SM. Opportunities for improving medication use and monitoring in gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Aug;68(8):1265–1270. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.092619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Harrold LR, Mazor KM, Velten S, Ockene IS, Yood RA. Patients and providers view gout differently: a qualitative study. Chronic Illn. 2010 Dec;6(4):263–271. doi: 10.1177/1742395310378761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Spencer K, Carr A, Doherty M. Patient and provider barriers to effective management of gout in general practice: a qualitative study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Sep;71(9):1490–1495. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Miller D, Shewchuk R, Elliot TR, Richards S. Nominal group technique: a process for identifying diabetes self-care issues among patients and caregivers. The Diabetes educator. 2000 Mar-Apr;26(2):305–310. 312, 314. doi: 10.1177/014572170002600211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hegger MJ. A fresh approach to group goal setting. The three-way rotation nomimal group technique. Journal of nursing staff development: JNSD. 1986 Winter;2(1):13–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gallagher M, Hares T, Spencer J, Bradshaw C, Webb I. The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice? Fam Pract. 1993 Mar;10(1):76–81. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.1.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Harrold LR, Mazor KM, Peterson D, Naz N, Firneno C, Yood R. Patients’ knowledge and beliefs concerning gout and its treatment: a population based study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Sep 21;13(1):180. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clatworthy J, Bowskill R, Rank T, Parham R, Horne R. Adherence to medication in bipolar disorder: a qualitative study exploring the role of patients’ beliefs about the condition and its treatment. Bipolar disorders. 2007 Sep;9(6):656–664. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rogers A, Addington-Hall JM, McCoy AS, Edmonds PM, Abery AJ, Coats AJ, Gibbs JS. A qualitative study of chronic heart failure patients’ understanding of their symptoms and drug therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002 Jun;4(3):283–287. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(01)00213-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]