Skip to main content
PMC home page
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Sep 19;9(9):e107447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107447

Dimethyl Sulfoxide Damages Mitochondrial Integrity and Membrane Potential in Cultured Astrocytes

Chan Yuan 1, Junying Gao 1, Jichao Guo 1, Lei Bai 1, Charles Marshall 2, Zhiyou Cai 3, Linmei Wang 1, Ming Xiao 1,*
Editor: Shilpa J Buch4
PMCID: PMC4169574  PMID: 25238609

Abstract

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a polar organic solvent that is used to dissolve neuroprotective or neurotoxic agents in neuroscience research. However, DMSO itself also has pharmacological and pathological effects on the nervous system. Astrocytes play a central role in maintaining brain homeostasis, but the effect and mechanism of DMSO on astrocytes has not been studied. The present study showed that exposure of astrocyte cultures to 1% DMSO for 24 h did not significantly affect cell survival, but decreased cell viability and glial glutamate transporter expression, and caused mitochondrial swelling, membrane potential impairment and reactive oxygen species production, and subsequent cytochrome c release and caspase-3 activation. DMSO at concentrations of 5% significantly inhibited cell variability and promoted apoptosis of astrocytes, accompanied with more severe mitochondrial damage. These results suggest that mitochondrial impairment is a primary event in DMSO-induced astrocyte toxicity. The potential cytotoxic effects on astrocytes need to be carefully considered during investigating neuroprotective or neurotoxic effects of hydrophobic agents dissolved by DMSO.

Introduction

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a polar organic solvent with various biological functions that is used extensively in both biological and medical research [1], [2]. In the neuroscience field, DMSO is commonly used to dissolve hydrophobic neuroprotective or neurotoxic agents [3]. Studies have also investigated the potential effects of DMSO itself on the nervous system [4]–[8]. DMSO treatment has been shown to reduce infarction volume and neuronal loss in rodent cerebral ischemia models [9]–[11]. Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that DMSO produces widespread neuronal apoptosis in the developing mouse brain and neuronal loss in rat hippocampal culture [12]. DMSO also can induce tau hyperphosphorylation, a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease, in the adult mouse brain [13]. DMSO produces a dose-dependent reduction in nerve conduction velocity with myelin disruption of the rat sciatic nerve [4]. These discrepant data suggest that DMSO plays protective or injurious roles in the brain, which may be due to differences in the model used as well as the concentration of DMSO administered.

Furthermore, there are several case reports that reveal severe neurotoxicity [14]–[18], encephalopathy [19]–[21] and transient global amnesia [22] associated with the infusion of DMSO-cryopreserved hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. These results highly suggest that DMSO has neurological side effects and toxicity. Therefore, it is necessary to further explore the neuropharmacological and neurotoxicological effects of DMSO.

Astrocytes, the most numerous glial cells in the mammalian brain, are responsible for maintaining brain homeostasis [23]. For example, astrocytes regulate glutamatergic neurotransmission and prevent glutamate excitotoxicity by removing excess glutamate from the extracellular synaptic space through glutamate transporters [24]. Astrocyte dysfunction has been implicated in a variety of neurological diseases [25]. Based on this, it is necessary to investigate effects of DMSO on astrocytes. However, to our knowledge, this issue has not been explored.

In the present study we provided evidence that DMSO has cytotoxic effects on astrocytes via disruption of mitochondrial integrity and membrane potential, resulting in oxidative stress, apoptosis and down-regulation of glutamate transporters. This finding expands our understanding of the neurotoxic mechanisms of DMSO and provides an experimental basis to select a safe dose of DMSO in neuroscience research.

Results

DMSO decreased survival and viability of cultured astrocytes

DMSO at concentrations of 0.5–1.5% is widely used as a solvent for various pharmacological agents in neuroscience research [3]. Thus, we selected DMSO at concentrations of 1% and 5% to observe and compare their neurotoxic profile in cultured astrocytes during a 24-h exposure period. Exposure of cultures to 1% DMSO had no significant effect on the growth and survival of astrocytes, but the cell viability was decreased by 16%, as revealed by 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. DMSO at concentrations of 5% caused a 40% decrease in the cell density and a 32% decrease in the cell viability (Figure 1A–C).

Figure 1. Effects of DMSO on survival and viability of mouse cortical astrocytes in culture.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) General growth profile of incubated with various concentrations of DMSO for 24 h. Astrocytes were grown well and closely adhered to each other on the surface of coverslips under normal circumstances and exposed to 1% DMSO. Many astrocytes were detached from the coverslips in 5% DMSO culture medium. (B–C) Quantitative analysis of the cell density (B) and cell viability (C) of astrocytes incubated with different concentrations of DMSO for 24 h. Data are shown as a mean ± SEM of five independent experiments performed in triplicate. *P<0.05 and **P <0.01 versus control group.

DMSO impaired mitochondrial integrity and membrane potential of cultured astrocytes

DMSO has been shown to concentration-dependently modulate the structure and properties of cell membranes [26], [27]. The mitochondrial membrane has a typical lipid bilayer structure and is vulnerable to various injury factors [28]. It is also known that mitochondrial damage is a major cause of decreased cell viability [29]. Thus, the impairment of DMSO on astrocyte mitochondria was investigated by using the transmission electron microscopy. Astrocytes treated with 1% DMSO for 24 h showed swelling of mitochondria (Figure 2A), as revealed by quantitation of mitochondrial cross-sectional area (Figure 2B). The swelling and disruption of mitochondria were more evident after exposure to 5% DMSO, and about 35% of mitochondria exhibited loss of cristae or formed monolayer vacuoles (Figure 2C).

Figure 2. Effects of DMSO on substructures of cultured mouse cortical astrocytes.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) Representative transmission electron micrographs showing substructural morphology of astrocytes after treatment with different concentrations of DMSO for 24 h. The disruption of mitochondria integrity becomes more severe with increased DMSO concentrations. Fragmentation of the nucleus, with condensation and margination of nuclear chromatin, was frequently observed in astrocytes exposed to 5% DMSO. (B) Quantitation of mitochondrial cross-sectional area. The results confirmed DMSO-induced mitochondrial swelling, with a significant rightward shift in the mitochondrial area cumulative frequency curve, relative to untreated control. (C) The quantitative analysis showed increases in the percentage of mitochondrial vacuolization in astrocytes treated with DMSO in a dose-dependent manner. Data are shown as a mean ± SEM of five independent experiments. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 versus control group.

The deleterious effect of DMSO on mitochondrial function of astrocytes was also determined by measurement of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) using fluroescence microscopy of tetramethylrhodamine methyl (TMRE). DMSO at concentrations in 1% and 5% caused significant decreases in ΔΨm in cultured astrocytes, as shown in Figure 3A and B.

Figure 3. Effects of DMSO on ΔΨm of cultured mouse cortical astrocytes.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Representative micrographs showing ΔΨm, revealed by TMRE fluorescent staining, in astrocytes treated with various concentrations of DMSO for 24 h. The left first micrograph is a positive control for depolarized mitochondria by incubated with 20 µM FCCP, an uncoupler of electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation, for 10 minutes prior to staining with TMRE. (B) The quantitative analysis revealed that TMRE fluorescence intensity was decreased in astrocytes treated with DMSO in a dose-dependent manner. Data are shown as a mean ± SEM of five independent experiments performed in triplicate. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 versus control group.

DMSO caused mitochondrial cytochrome c (Cyt c) release in cultured astrocytes

It is also known that disruption of mitochondrial integrity results in a release of Cyt c from the mitochondrial intermembrane space into the cytosol [30]. Therefore, we investigated the effects of DMSO on mitochondrial Cyt c release in cultured astrocytes. The flow cytometry results showed that the concentration of Cyt c in the astrocyte cytoplasm increased after treatment with 1% and 5% DMSO for 24 h (Figure 4A–B). The Western blotting further confirmed that DMSO induced Cyt c release from the mitochondria. DMSO-treated astrocytes had low levels of Cyt c in the mitochondrial fraction and high levels of Cyt c in the cytosolic fraction, compared with intact controls (Figure 4C–D).

Figure 4. Effects of DMSO on and the release of mitochondrial Cyt c and intracellular ROS generation in cultured mouse cortical astrocytes.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(A) Representative flow cytometry data showing mitochondrial Cyt c-FITC fluorescence within the cytoplasm of astrocytes treated with various concentrations of DMSO for 24 h. (B) Quantitative analysis of Cyt c-FITC fluorescence intensity. (C) Representative western blot bands showing expression levels of Cyt c in cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions of astrocytes treated with various concentrations of DMSO for 24 h. β-tubulin and COX IV, which were exclusively expressed within the cytosol and mitochondria, respectively, were used as loading controls. (D) The quantitative analysis of the relative optical density of cytosol and mitochondrial Cyt c showing that DMSO caused translocation of Cyt c from the mitochondria into the cytoplasm of astrocytes. Data are shown as a mean ± SEM of five (for flow cytometry) or four (for Western blot) independent experiments performed in triplicate. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 versus control group.

DMSO increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in cultured astrocytes

It has been demonstrated that decreased ΔΨm reduces aerobic metabolism and increases ROS generation [31], [32]. Thus, the generation of mitochondrial ROS in DMSO-treated astrocytes was assessed by detection of MitoSOX-Red, a highly selective detector of superoxide in live cell mitochondria, using the flow cytometry. The intensity of Mito-SOX fluorescence was increased in a concentration dependent manner (Figure 5A–B). DMSO-increased intracellular ROS levels were also observed using an oxidant-sensitive probe DCFH-DA and the flow cytometry (Figure 5C–D).

Figure 5. Effects of DMSO on mitochondrial and intracellular ROS generation in cultured mouse cortical astrocytes.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(A) Representative flow cytometry data showing Mito-SOX fluorescence, a highly selective indicator of superoxide in live cell mitochondria, in astrocytes treated with various concentrations of DMSO for 24 h. (B) Quantitative analysis revealed that the Mito-SOX fluorescence intensity increased in astrocytes treated with DMSO with a dose-dependent manner. (C) Representative flow cytometry data showing DCF fluorescence in astrocytes treated with various concentrations of DMSO for 24 h. (D) The quantitative analysis showed that ROS levels were increased in astrocytes treated with DMSO at 5% concentration but not at 1%, by detecting the fluorescence intensity of DCF. (E) Data are shown as a mean ± SEM of five independent experiments performed in triplicate. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 versus control group. #P<0.05, ## P<0.01 versus 5% DMSO treated group.

DMSO induced apoptosis of cultured astrocytes

There is evidence that Cyt c release and ROS generation caused by mitochondria damage and/or dysfunction play a central role in initiating apoptosis [33]–[36]. Thus, we examined the effects of DMSO on astrocyte apoptosis. The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) and quantitative analysis revealed that the percentage of apoptotic astrocytes was not significantly different between the baseline condition and 1% DMSO, but increased in 5% DMSO (Figure 6A–B). Astrocytes exposed to 1% or 5% DMSO for 24 h showed decreases in anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 expression and procaspse-3 expression, while increases in cleaved caspase-3 expression, as revealed by the Western blot analysis (Figure 6C–D).

Figure 6. Effects of DMSO on apoptosis of cultured mouse cortical astrocytes.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Astrocytes were incubated with various concentrations of DMSO for 24 h. (A) Representative micrographs showing TUNEL positive apoptotic astrocytes (cyan-blue). Cell nuclei counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). (B) Quantitative analysis of astrocyte apoptosis. (C) Representative western blot bands showing expression levels of procaspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 and Bcl-2 in astrocytes. (D) The quantitative analysis showed that Bcl-2 and procaspase-3 expression levels were decreased, but cleaved caspase-3 expression level was increased in astrocytes treated with 1% or 5% DMSO. Data are shown as a mean ± SEM of five (for TUNEL) or four (for Western blot) independent experiments performed in triplicate. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 versus control group.

DMSO decreased glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1) and glutamate-aspartate transporter (GLAST) expression in cultured astrocytes

Astrocytes are responsible for maintaining glutamate homeostasis in the central nervous system by glutamate transporters that are vulnerable to oxidative stress [37]. Thus, we examined whether increased ROS generation resulted in down-regulation of GLT-1 and GLAST in DMSO-treated astrocytes. The immunoreactivity for these proteins decreased in astrocytes exposed to 1% and 5% DMSO (Figure 7A–B). DMSO-reduced GLT-1 and GLAST expression in a concentration-dependent pattern was confirmed by the Western blot analysis (Figure 7C–D).

Figure 7. Effects of DMSO on expression of GLT-1 and GLAST in cultured mouse cortical astrocytes.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

(A) Representative micrographs showing immunoreactivity of GLT-1 and GLAST in astrocytes treated with various concentrations of DMSO for 24 h. (B) Mean integrated optical density (MIOD) of immunostaining for GLT-1 and GLAST. (C) Representative western blot bands showing expression levels of GLT-1 and GLAST in astrocytes. (D) Quantitative analysis revealed that GLT-1 and GLAST protein levels were decreased in astrocytes treated with DMSO in a dose-dependent manner. Data are shown as a mean ± SEM of five (for immunostaining) or four (for Western blot) independent experiments performed in triplicate. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 versus control group.

Discussion

DMSO at concentrations of 0.5–1.5% is widely used as a solvent for various pharmacological agents in both cell culture and in vivo studies [3]. However, the biological effects of DMSO may be neglected, because a vehicle control is not always incorporated into the design of experiments. An early study suggested that exposure of primary hippocampal cell cultures to DMSO in the range of 0.5–1.0% for 24 h has no significant effect on the survival of neurons, but can prevent glutamate-induced neuronal death via suppression of NMDA- and AMPA-induced ion currents and calcium influx [38]. A followed study has shown that treatment with DMSO at concentrations of 0.5% or 1.0% for 6 DIV produces a substantial decrease in the number of cultured hippocampal neurons [12]. In the present study, a DMSO concentration of 1% does not significantly affect the astrocyte survival during a 24-h exposure period, but impairs cell viability, mitochondrial integrity and glutamate transporter expression. Exposure of astrocyte cultures to DMSO at concentrations of 5% significantly impairs cell survival and increased apoptosis. Collectively, these results provide strong in vitro evidence for the neuropharmacological and neurotoxicological effects of DMSO.

The amphiphilic characteristic of DMSO imparts extensive actions in membrane fusion processes, cryopreservation, and membrane permeability enhancement [39], [40]. A molecular dynamics simulation employing coarse-grained models suggested that DMSO modulates the structure and properties of cell membranes in a concentration-dependent manner [27]. DMSO induces membrane thinning and increases fluidity of the membrane's hydrophobic core at low concentrations (<10 mol%), formation of transient water pores in the bilayer membrane at 10–20 mol%, and local loss in integrity of the phospholipid membranes at higher concentrations. The present results demonstrated that cultured mouse astrocytes exposed to 1.0% DMSO for 24 h exhibit impairments of the mitochondrial integrity and ΔΨm, although their general growth profile is not altered compared to those in control medium. This result suggests that mitochondrial membrane is vulnerable to DMSO, which might be due to its relatively high membrane fluidity [28].

Mitochondria are the center of cell metabolism and energy transformation; and their malfunction decreases cell viability [29], [41]. In agreement with this notion, we demonstrated that DMSO inhibits astrocyte viability in a dose-dependent manner, accompanied with mitochondrial structural and functional disruption. Astrocytes exposed to DMSO at concentrations of 1.0% also increases Cyt c release and activated caspase 3 expression, and decreases anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 expression, supporting the review that rupture of mitochondria is an initial trigger of apoptotic cascades [28], [35]. Furthermore, the present results indicated that DMSO dose-dependently increases mitochondria-derived ROS production, which is consistent with the notion that degenerated mitochondria are the primary site of ROS production [32]. Taken together, these results reveal that mitochondrial impairment is a primary event in the astrocyte toxicity of DMSO.

Glutamate, the major excitatory amino acid neurotransmitter in the brain, can become potentially toxic when it over-accumulates in the synaptic space [42]. As mentioned earlier, astrocytes are responsible for maintaining brain glutamate homeostasis via glutamate transporters [24]. Oxidative stress inhibits glutamate transporter expression and function, which has been implicated as a main pathogenesis for glutamate excitotoxicity in a variety of pathological conditions, including brain ischemia [43], [44], traumatic brain injury [45], epilepsy [46] and neurodegeneration [47], [48]. The present results have demonstrated that DMSO causes down-regulation of GLT1 and GLAST in cultured astrocytes. In addition to increased ROS production, decreased cell viability and mitochondrial dysfunction may impair glutamate transporter synthesis by astrocytes. High concentration of DMSO has been shown to degrade membrane structure and disturb secondary protein structures within membrane proteins [26], [27]. This may also contribute to decreased expression of GTL1 and GLAST. Down-regulation of glutamate transporters may lead to neuronal excitotoxicity, thus exacerbating DMSO-induced neuronal damage. The results help to explain the occurrence of epilepsy in humans [14]–[18] and rats [49] following exposure to high concentration of DMSO.

In summary, the present results reveal that mitochondrial damage, oxidative stress and apoptosis are involved in DMSO-induced astrocyte toxicity. DMSO at concentrations of 1% impairs cell viability, mitochondrial integrity and glutamate transporter expression of astrocytes, although does not affect their survival and apoptosis during a 24-h exposure period. Further in vivo studies are necessary to address whether astrocyte dysfunction is involved in neurobehavioral consequences of acute high dose or chronic low dose exposure to DMSO. Exploring these issues will help objective evaluation of pharmacological or toxicological effects of DMSO itself, or as a solvent or carrier for hydrophobic agents.

Experimental Methods

Animals

Adult CD1 mice (8–10-weeks-old) weighting 20–25 g were housed 4 per cage in a room maintained at 22±1°C with an alternating 12 h light–dark cycle. Food and water was available ad libitum. Animal protocols used in the study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Nanjing Medical University.

Astrocyte cultures and drug treatment

The cerebral cortices of post-natal day 1–3 CD1 mice were isolated and dissociated with 0.125% trypsin (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) digestion and trituration with a flame-polished pasture pipet. Following filtration, dissociated cells were suspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco BRL, Guithersburg, MD, USA), then plated into tissue culture flasks coated with 100 mg/ml poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and placed in a humidified cell culture incubator at 37°C in an atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. Culture medium was changed every 2 or 3 days. Seven or eight days after plating, cells were passaged, subjected to a partial media exchange, and incubated for another 5–6 days. The cultures consisted of at least 95% astrocytes as determined by immunostaining against the astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the microglial marker CD11b.

Astrocytes of the second passage were then resuspended in DMEM/10% FBS, and plated into poly-L-lysine-coated plates as follows: 24-well microtiter plates (5×105 cells/well) for morphological, immunocytochemical, ΔΨm and apoptosis assays, 96-well microtiter plates (2×104 cells/well) for viability assay, and 6-well plates (2×106 cells/well) for Western blot and flow cytometric analyses. The cells were allowed to grow for 1–2 days to reach confluence, then treated with different concentrations (0, 1 and 5%) of DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 24 h.

Astrocyte survival and morphological assay

After treatment with different concentrations of DMSO for 24 h, the growth of astrocytes was examined by a phase contrast microscope and 5 randomly selected areas per well were imaged at 100×magnification. Total number of cells in each image was counted using the Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The density of cells (cell number per mm2) was calculated and expressed as a percentage of the untreated control cells.

Cell viability assay

Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay [50]. After replacement of fresh DMEM, 20 µl of 5 mg/ml MTT (Sigma-Aldrich) was added and incubated for 4 h, the culture medium was discarded and 150 µl DMSO was used to dissolve the precipitate. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm using an Automated Microplated Reader ELx800 (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). Results are expressed as percentage of control values.

Transmission electron microscopy

DMSO-treated astrocytes were fixed with 4°C 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.4) for 2 h. The cells were detached with 0.125% trypsin, and collected by centrifugation for 10 min at 1000 g, rinsed with PBS and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide with 0.1% potassium ferricyanide for 48 h. The cell samples were dehydrated through a graded series of ethanol, and embedded in Epon 812. Sixty-micrometer-thick ultrasections were stained with 1% uranyl acetate and 0.1% lead citrate, and examined with a Jeol 1200EX electron microscope (Jeol Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan). Ten astrocytes from each group were randomly captured at a magnification of ×12000 and used for quantitation of mitochondrial cross-sectional area using an Image-Pro Plus 6.0 Analysis System (Media Cybernetics Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA). The percentage of vacuolated mitochondria, characterized by partial or complete loss of cristae, was counted.

Measurement of ΔΨm

ΔΨm was assessed using a live cell assay with the fluorescent lipophilic cationic dye TMRE (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). This dye is a cell permeant, positively-charged, red-orange dye that readily accumulates in active mitochondria due to their relative negative charge [51]. After treatment with different concentrations of DMSO for 24 h, cultured astrocytes were stained with 200 nM TMRE for 30 min at 37°C, then washed twice in medium and re-suspended in PBS. The fluorescent images were immediately taken using a Zeiss AX10 inverted fluorescence scope (Carl Zeiss Microimaging Inc., Germany). Some samples incubated with 20 µM carbonylcyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP), an uncoupler of electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation, for 10 minutes prior to staining with TMRE, served as a positive control for depolarized mitochondria. The TMRE fluorescence density was analyzed using an Image-Pro Plus 6.0 Analysis System. The data are presented as percentage of control values.

Assay of Cyt c release

After treatment with different concentrations of DMSO for 24 h, cultured astrocytes were incubated in 4°C permeabilisation buffer (100 mM KCl, 100 µg/ml digitonin in PBS) for 3–5 min. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at room temperature, washed twice with PBS, and detached enzymatically. The cells were then centrifuged, resuspended in 1 ml blocking buffer (3% bovine serum albumin, 0.05% saponin in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature, and incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-Cyt c (1∶2000; Abcam, San Francisco, CA, USA) overnight at 4°C. The cells were rinsed twice with PBS, then incubated with FITC conjugate secondary antibody (1∶200, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 1 h at the room temperature. The samples were analyzed by a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson) at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and an emission wavelength of 525 nm.

Measurement of mitochondrial and intracellular ROS generation

Mitochondria-mediated ROS generation was detected with the mitochondrial superoxide indicator MitoSOX-Red. Intracellular ROS were detected using an oxidation-sensitive fluorescent probe 2′-7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). DCFH-DA was deacetylated intracellularly by nonspecific esterase, which was then further oxidized by ROS to the fluorescent compound 2,7-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) [52]. Astrocytes were treated with different concentrations of DMSO (0, 1 and 5%). Cells were then washed twice in PBS and placed in a humidified incubator (5% CO2 and 95% air) at 37°C with 5 mmol/L of MitoSOX-Red (Invitrogen) for 15 min or 2.5 µg/ml DCFH-DA (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 30 min. Subsequently, the cells were washed twice in culture medium and trypsinized. The cell pellet was re-suspended in PBS followed by analysis on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson).

Isolation of mitochondrial fraction and cytosolic fraction

Each cell sample was homogenized in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 200 mM mannitol, 80 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.4), and the protease inhibitor cocktail. Homogenates were centrifuged briefly at 750 rpm for 10 min at 4°C in an Eppendorf centrifuge. After removing the top half of the supernatants, the rest of the supernatants were centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C. The pellets were then washed 3 times and suspended in the lysis buffer as the mitochondrial fraction. Supernatants of 8,000 rpm centrifugation were centrifuged at 100,000 rpm for 1 h at 4°C. The resulting supernatants were cytosolic fraction. The protein concentration of each sample was determined using the Bradford assay.

Western blot analysis

DMSO-treated astrocytes were washed with Ca2+- and Mg2+-free PBS, then detached from the plates by scraping, and harvested by centrifugation for 5 min at 1500 g. Cell pellets were suspended in 60 µl lysis buffer containing 200 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF) and homogenized on ice by an ultrasonic homogenizer. The lysates were centrifuged (12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C) and the protein concentration in the extracts was determined using the Bradford assay. Samples of the cell extracts or mitochondrial and cytosolic fractions were denatured with a SDS sample buffer and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes followed by blocking membranes with 5% skimmed milk dissolved in TBST (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.1% Tween20) at room temperature for 2 h. After three washes with TBST buffer, membranes were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-Cyt c (1∶2000; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal antibody against procaspase 3 (1∶1200; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal antibody against cleaved-caspase 3 (1∶800; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal antibody against Bcl-2 (1∶200; Santa Cruz BioTech, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit polyclonal antibody against GLT-1 (1∶500; Santa Cruz BioTech) or rabbit polyclonal antibody against GLAST (1∶500, Santa Cruz BioTech), rabbit polyclonal antibody against COX IV (1∶1200; Abcam) or mouse monoclonal antibody against β-tubulin (1∶3000; Abcam) at 4°C overnight. The bands were detected with biotin conjugated secondary antibodies (1∶200, Vector Laboratories), rinsed and visualized by ECL plus Western blotting detection system. β-tubulin was used as an internal control.

Apoptosis assay

Cell apoptosis was detected by TUNEL assay using the In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). After treatment with different concentrations of DMSO, astrocytes on coverslips were washed with PBS and fixed in freshly made 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h. After permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 (dissolved in 0.1% sodium citrate) for 5 min, the coverslips were incubated with 20 µg/ml proteinase K for 15 min at 37°C, then incubated with 100 µl TUNEL reaction mixture for 1 h at 37°C. The reaction was ceased by washing with PBS for 3 times. After counterstaining with Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich), TUNEL positive cells were captured using a Leica DM4000B digital microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The percentage of TUNEL positive astrocytes in the culture was counted.

Immunostaining

After washing 3 times in PBS, astrocytes on coverslips, or dewaxed hippocampal sections, were treated with 2% Triton X-100 containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h. They were then incubated with mouse monoclonal antibody against GFAP (1∶1000; Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit polyclonal antibody against GLT-1 (1∶400; Santa Cruz) or rabbit polyclonal antibody against GLAST (1∶400, Santa Cruz) at 4°C overnight. After PBS rinses, appropriate secondary antibodies were applied for 1 h at 37°C. The signals were visualized by 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Sigma-Aldrich) and captured using a Leica DM4000B digital microscope. The mean integrated optical density (MIOD) was measured to assess the expression levels of GFAP, GLT-1 or GLAST using Image J software. The data are presented as percentage of control values.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). The significance of difference was evaluated with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedures followed by the Bonferroni test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Data Availability

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are included within the paper.

Funding Statement

Funding was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81271210) and the Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis,decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Santos NC, Figueira-Coelho J, Martins-Silva J, Saldanha C (2003) Multidisciplinary utilization of dimethyl sulfoxide: pharmacological, cellular, and molecular aspects. Biochem Pharmacol 65: 1035–1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Balakin KV, Savchuk NP, Tetko IV (2006) In silico approaches to prediction of aqueous and DMSO solubility of drug-like compounds: trends, problems and solutions. Curr Med Chem 13: 223–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Jacob SW, de la Torre JC (2009) Pharmacology of dimethyl sulfoxide in cardiac and CNS damage. Pharmacol Rep 61: 225–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cavaletti G, Oggioni N, Sala F, Pezzoni G, Cavalletti E, et al. (2000) Effect on the peripheral nervous system of systemically administered dimethylsulfoxide in the rat: a neurophysiological and pathological study. Toxicol Lett 118, 103–107. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5. Authier N, Dupuis E, Kwasiborski A, Eschalier A, Coudoré F (2002) Behavioural assessment of dimethylsulfoxide neurotoxicity in rats. Toxico Lett 132: 117–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fossum EN, Lisowski MJ, Macey TA, Ingram SL, Morgan MM (2008) Microinjection of the vehicle dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) into the periaqueductal gray modulates morphine antinociception. Brain Res 1204: 53–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Turan NN, Akar F, Budak B, Seren M, Parlar AI, et al. (2008) How DMSO, a widely used solvent, affects spinal cord injury. Ann Vasc Surg 22: 98–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Budinich CS, Tucker LB, Lowe D, Rosenberger JG, McCabe JT (2013) Short and long-term motor and behavioral effects of diazoxide and dimethyl sulfoxide administration in the mouse after traumatic brain injury. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 108: 66–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Shimizu S, Simon RP, Graham SH (1997) Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) treatment reduces infarction volume after permanent focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Neurosci Lett 239: 125–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Phillis JW, Estevez AY, O′Regan MH (1998) Protective effects of the free radical scavengers, dimethyl sulfoxide and ethanol, in cerebral ischemia in gerbils. Neurosci Lett 244: 109–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Di Giorgio AM, Hou Y, Zhao X, Zhang B, Lyeth BG, et al. (2008) Dimethyl sulfoxide provides neuroprotection in a traumatic brain injury model. Restor Neurol Neurosci 26: 501–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hanslick JL, Lau K, Noguchi KK, Olney JW, Zorumski CF, et al. (2009) Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) produces widespread apoptosis in the developing central nervous system. Neurobiol Dis 34: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Julien C, Marcouiller F, Bretteville A, El Khoury NB, Baillargeon J, et al. (2012) Dimethyl sulfoxide induces both direct and indirect Tau hyperphosphorylation. PLoS ONE 7: e40020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Windrum P, Morris TC (2003) Severe neurotoxicity because of dimethyl sulphoxide following peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 31: 315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bauwens D, Hantson P, Laterre PF, Michaux L, Latinne D, et al. (2005) Recurrent seizure and sustained encephalopathy associated with dimethylsulfoxide-preserved stem cell infusion. Leuk Lymphoma 46: 1671–1674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Mueller LP, Theurich S, Christopeit M, Grothe W, Muetherig A, et al. (2007) Neurotoxicity upon infusion of dimethylsulfoxide-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells in patients with and without pre-existing cerebral disease. Eur J Haematol 78: 527–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Júnior AM, Arrais CA, Saboya R, Velasques RD, Junqueira PL, et al. (2008) Neurotoxicity associated with dimethylsulfoxide-preserved hematopoietic progenitor cell infusion. Bone Marrow Transplant 41: 95–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Abdelkefi A, Lakhal A, Moojat N, Hamed LB, Fekih J, et al. (2009) Severe neurotoxicity associated with dimethyl sulphoxide following PBSCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 44: 323–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Dhodapkar M, Goldberg SL, Tefferi A, Gertz MA (1994) Reversible encephalopathy after cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cell infusion. Am J Hematol 45: 187–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Higman MA, Port JD, Bezuchamp NJ Jr, Chen AR (2000) Reversible leukoencephalopathy associated with re-infusion of DMSO preserved stem cells. Bone Marrow Transplant 26: 797–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Marcacci G, Corazzelli G, Becchimanzi C, Arcamone M, Capobianco G, et al. (2009) DMSO-associated encephalopathy during autologous peripheral stem cell infusion: a predisposing role of preconditioning exposure to CNS-penetrating agents? Bone Marrow Transplant 44: 133–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Otrock ZK, Beydoun A, Barada WM, Masroujeh R, Hourani R, et al. (2008) Transient global amnesia associated with the infusion of DMSO-cryopreserved autologous peripheral blood stem cells. Haematologica 93: e36–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Allen NJ, Barres BA (2009) Neuroscience: Glia - more than just brain glue. Nature 457: 675–677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Volterra A, Meldolesi J (2005) Astrocytes, from brain glue to communication elements: the revolution continues. Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 626–640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Seifert G, Schilling K, Steinhäuser C (2006) Astrocyte dysfunction in neurological disorders: a molecular perspective. Nat Rev Neurosci 7: 194–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Notman R, Noro M, O′Malley B, Anwar J (2006) Molecular basis for dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) action on lipid membranes. J Am Chem Soc 128: 13982–13983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gurtovenko AA, Anwar J (2007) Modulating the structure and properties of cell membranes: the molecular mechanism of action of dimethyl sulfoxide. J Phys Chem B 111: 10453–10460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Sesso A, Belizário JE, Marques MM, Higuchi ML, Schumacher RI, et al. (2012) Mitochondrial swelling and incipient outer membrane rupture in preapoptotic and apoptotic cells. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 295: 1647–1659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Gogvadze V, Orrenius S (2006) Mitochondrial regulation of apoptotic cell death. Chem Biol Interact 163: 4–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Garrido C, Galluzzi L, Brunet M, Puig PE, Didelot C, et al. (2006) Mechanisms of cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Cell Death Differ 13: 1423–1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Murphy MP (2009) How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem J 417: 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Suski JM, Lebiedzinska M, Bonora M, Pinton P, Duszynski J, et al. (2012) Relation between mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS formation. Methods Mol Biol 810: 183–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Chandra J, Samali A, Orrenius S (2000) Triggering and modulation of apoptosis by oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med 29: 323–333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ott M, Robertson JD, Gogvadze V, Zhivotovsky B, Orrenius S (2002) Cytochrome c release from mitochondria proceeds by a two-step process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 1259–1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Gogvadze V, Orrenius S, Zhivotovsky B (2006) Multiple pathways of cytochrome c release from mitochondria in apoptosis. Biochim Biophys Acta 57: 639–647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Tsujimoto Y, Shimizu S (2007) Role of the mitochondrial membrane permeability transition in cell death. Apoptosis 12: 835–840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Trotti D, Danbolt NC, Volterra A (1998) Glutamate transporters are oxidant-vulnerable: a molecular link between oxidative and excitotoxic neurodegeneration? Trends Pharmacol Sci 19: 328–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Lu C, Mattson MP (2001) Dimethyl sulfoxide suppresses NMDA- and AMPA-induced ion currents and calcium influx and protects against excitotoxic death in hippocampal neurons. Exp Neurol 170: 180–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Yu ZW, Quinn PJ (1998) Solvation effects of dimethyl sulphoxide on the structure of phospholipid bilayers. Biophys Chem 70: 35–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Capriotti K, Capriotti JA (2012) Dimethyl sulfoxide: history, chemistry, and clinical utility in dermatology. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 5: 24–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Borutaite V (2010) Mitochondria as decision-makers in cell death. Environ Mol Mutagen 51: 406–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Tapia R (1996) Release and uptake of glutamate as related to excitotoxicity. Rev Bras Biol 56: 165–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. An SJ, Kang TC, Park SK, Hwang IK, Cho SS, et al. (2002) Oxidative DNA damage and alteration of glutamate transporter expressions in the hippocampal Ca1 area immediately after ischemic insult. Mol Cells 13: 476–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Zhao B, Chen Y, Sun X, Zhou M, Ding J, et al. (2012) Phenolic alkaloids from Menispermum dauricum rhizome protect against brain ischemia injury via regulation of GLT-1, EAAC1 and ROS generation. Molecules 17: 2725–2737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Rao VL, Başkaya MK, Doğan A, Rothstein JD, Dempsey RJ (1998) Traumatic brain injury down-regulates glial glutamate transporter (GLT-1 and GLAST) proteins in rat brain. J Neurochem 70: 2020–2027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Gorter JA, Van Vliet EA, Proper EA, De Graan PN, Ghijsen WE, et al. (2002) Glutamate transporters alterations in the reorganizing dentate gyrus are associated with progressive seizure activity in chronic epileptic rats. J Comp Neurol 442: 365–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Sheldon AL, Robinson MB (2007) The role of glutamate transporters in neurodegenerative diseases and potential opportunities for intervention. Neurochem Int 51: 333–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Kim K, Lee SG, Kegelman TP, Su ZZ, Das SK, et al. (2011) Role of excitatory amino acid transporter-2 (EAAT2) and glutamate in neurodegeneration: opportunities for developing novel therapeutics. J Cell Physiol 226: 2484–2493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kovács Z, Czurkó A, Kékesi KA, Juhász G (2011) The effect of intraperitoneally administered dimethyl sulfoxide on absence-like epileptic activity of freely moving WAG/Rij rats. J. Neurosci. Methods 197: 133–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Zeng XN, Sun XL, Gao L, Fan Y, Ding JH, et al. (2007) Aquaporin-4 deficiency down-regulates glutamate uptake and GLT-1 expression in astrocytes. Mol. Cell. Neurosci 34: 34–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Chazotte B (2011) Labeling mitochondria with TMRM or TMRE. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2011: 895–897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Eruslanov E, Kusmartsev S (2010) Identification of ROS using oxidized DCFDA and flow-cytometry. Methods Mol Biol 594: 57–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are included within the paper.

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES