Resistance Inducers Modulate Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato Strain DC3000 Response in Tomato Plants

Loredana Scalschi; Gemma Camañes; Eugenio Llorens; Emma Fernández-Crespo; María M López; Pilar García-Agustín; Begonya Vicedo

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106429

. 2014 Sep 22;9(9):e106429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106429

Resistance Inducers Modulate Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato Strain DC3000 Response in Tomato Plants

Loredana Scalschi ¹, Gemma Camañes ¹, Eugenio Llorens ¹, Emma Fernández-Crespo ¹, María M López ², Pilar García-Agustín ¹, Begonya Vicedo ^1,^*

Editor: Szabolcs Semsey³

PMCID: PMC4171367 PMID: 25244125

Abstract

The efficacy of hexanoic acid (Hx) as an inducer of resistance in tomato plants against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 was previously demonstrated, and the plant response was characterized. Because little is known about the reaction of the pathogen to this effect, the goal of the present work was to determine whether the changes in the plant defence system affect the pathogen behaviour. This work provides the first demonstration of the response of the pathogen to the changes observed in plants after Hx application in terms of not only the population size but also the transcriptional levels of genes involved in quorum sensing establishment and pathogenesis. Therefore, it is possible that Hx treatment attenuates the virulence and survival of bacteria by preventing or diminishing the appearance of symptoms and controlling the growth of the bacteria in the mesophyll. It is interesting to note that the gene transcriptional changes in the bacteria from the treated plants occur at the same time as the changes in the plants. Hx is able to alter bacteria pathogenesis and survival only when it is applied as a resistance inducer because the changes that it promotes in plants affect the bacteria.

Introduction

Resistance-inducing agents that activate the natural defences of plants have been identified, and it is known that their application protects plants through the induction of defences that are effective against a wide spectrum of pathogens. Their mechanism of action has been studied in different pathosystems over the last years [1]–[6]. However, all of the previous studies were focused on plant defence responses, and little is known about how the pathogen reacts against the induction of plant defences.

Previous investigations by our research group have shown that the resistance-inducer hexanoic acid (Hx) protects Solanum lycopersicum plants against the necrotroph Botrytis cinerea, a pathogen that has proven difficult to chemically control [1], [6]. Furthermore, its efficacy was demonstrated in Arabidopsis thaliana [7]. We also observed an approximately 50% reduction in disease symptoms against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 (Pst DC3000) in treated plants compared with non-treated plants [6], which suggests that Hx induces resistance against this pathogen. The mechanisms involved in the induction of resistance have been studied in plants [4], but the bacterial response to this process remains unelucidated. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to gain insight into the mechanism of action of Hx, particularly its effect on bacterial pathogens.

We chose the plant pathogen Pst DC3000 because it represents an important pathogen that infects economically important crops. In nature, this pathogen causes bacterial speck disease in tomato and bell pepper and can also infect Arabidopsis and Brassica species in the laboratory [8], [9]. Moreover, Pst DC3000 is considered a model organism for molecular studies of plant-pathogen interactions [10], [11].

The infection cycle of Pst DC3000 is typical for a foliar pathogenic bacterium. In a successful disease cycle, Pst DC3000 generally shows two lifestyles that are spatially and temporally interconnected: an initial epiphytic phase and a subsequent endophytic phase in the apoplast [12]. Before initiating disease, Pst DC3000 strains achieve large epiphytic population sizes on healthy leaves [13]. Bacterial populations are capable of coordinating the expression of some traits in a cell-density-dependent manner through the process known as quorum-sensing (QS) [14], [15]. Pst DC3000 and many other Gram-negative bacteria use N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) as the QS signal molecule [16]. In addition, psyI of Pst DC3000 functions as an AHL synthase, and psyI expression, as well as AHL production, are under the control of the sigma regulator PsrA. Elevated levels of AHL due to higher population densities result in the expression of virulence factors and secondary metabolites that mediate colonization of the host.

Pst DC3000 contains more than thirty type III effectors [17], [18]. One of the most important effectors for the virulence of the bacteria is AvrPtoB (hopAB2), which has been found to act inside plant cells to suppress programmed cell death associated with plant immunity and increases pathogen growth and disease formation [19]. The effectors, together with the T3SS apparatus, are encoded by the hrp/hrc regulon. The hrpL gene encodes the alternate RNA polymerase sigma factor σL, which is one of the primary transcription factors that modulate the expression of the T3SS [20].

Pst DC3000 produces a polyketide toxin named coronatine (COR) [21]. COR is a chlorosis-inducing phytotoxin that contributes to bacterial growth and lesion formation or expansion in the host tissue. COR acts as a virulence factor in various P. syringae pathovars by generating increased lesion size and bacterial multiplication [22]. Several studies have shown that COR plays a critical role in pathogenesis [23], [24]. Moreover, it is known that COR controls stomata opening upon bacterial infection [12]. COR consists of two distinct moieties that are synthesized by separate pathways, and an amide linkage then joins the two moieties: the polyketide coronafacic acid (CFA) and coronamic acid (CMA), an ethylcyclopropyl amino acid derived from isoleucine [25].

The role of CorA, the major magnesium transporter, in pathogenesis has been studied in a number of organisms, such as Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium, in which it is required for full virulence [26]. A role for CorA has also been established in the human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori, where it is required for viability under limiting Mg²⁺ conditions [27]. In addition to being necessary for bacterial growth, magnesium is a cofactor in ATP-requiring enzymatic reactions [28] and is directly involved in membrane stability [29].

In this study, we investigated whether the resistance inducer Hx displays any direct antimicrobial effect on the target bacterium by performing in vitro assays with different Hx concentrations to determine its effect on bacterial growth, viability, and gene expression. Moreover, the effect of Hx treatment on the bacteria during plant infection was also investigated through an analysis of the expression of genes related to the different components of pathogenicity and virulence explained above. From our in vitro experiments, we can conclude that higher concentrations of Hx may have a temporary bacteriostatic effect against Pst DC3000 or a short-term bactericidal effect.

On the other hand, we previously observed that Hx treatment against Pst DC3000 affects the JA and SA pathways and prevents stomata opening induced by coronatine in planta [4]. Concurrently, in this study, we noticed a reduction in the expression of bacterial genes involved in quorum sensing establishment and pathogenesis, such as COR synthesis genes, genes associated with the type III secretion system, and genes responsible for effector synthesis in treated plants.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The P. syringae pv. tomato strain used in the present study was DC3000, rifampicin resistent. Rifampicin was added to King B medium (KB) at 50 µg mL⁻¹. Mutants used were ΔhrpL, (Beuzon, C. Dep. Biología Celular, Genética y Fisiología Universidad de Malaga, Spain), ΔhrpA (He, S. Dep. of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington), Δcma-cfa (Brooks, D. Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis) and Δpto(ΔavrPto-ΔavrPtoB) (Martin, G. Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research, Tower Rd., Ithaca,). They were grown in King's B medium (KB) [54] at 28°C with their specific antibiotics.

Bacterial growth assay

We tested Hx effect against Pst DC3000 and several mutants. Long time experiments were performed in LB medium to which, the resistance inducer was added at a final concentration of 0.6, 1.5, 5, 10 and 20 mM. pH of medium was adjusted to 7 after Hx was added and before adding the bacteria. The strain was precultivated in LB overnight to obtain the inoculum. The bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, washed and resuspended in sterilized MgSO₄ (10 mM).

The growth assay was carried in a Bioscreen C analysator (Labsystem, Finland). In a total volume of 350 µl in microtiter wells using an initial bacterial density of about 1×10³ cfu/mL. Bacterial growth was monitored by measuring optical density every 10 min with periodic shaking for 96 h at 26°C. The results were printed out as growth curves.

Moreover Hx effect to short time points was studied with M9 medium (Sigma) to wich Hx was added at a final concentration of 10 and 20 mM. Bacteria were preincubated as described above and added to final concentration of 1×10³ cfu/ml. Pst DC3000 was incubated with shaking for 16 h to 26°C. After this time, live and dead cell were quantified as described below.

Live and dead cell quantification

The proportion of living vs. dead cells was quantified using the fluorescent LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit, L13152 (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). For live and dead cell quantification, 50 µl of bacterial suspension were mixed with 25 µl of each of the two components of the LIVE/DEAD BacLight kit and incubated in the dark for 20 min. The viability of the cells was determined by enumerating the live and dead cells using an epifluorescence microscope Leica IRB equipped with a Leica DBC300F camera (Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Live and dead cells were enumerated in 15 microscopic fields at 1000× magnification.Two independent experiments were performed with five repetitions for each treatment.

Plant inoculation

Four-week-old tomato plants of Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Ailsa Craig were treated with Hx and inoculated as described by Scalschi et al. [4].Hx treatment was applied by soil drench to 4-week-old plants grown in jiffy peat pellets at a concentration of 0.6 mM, 72 h before bacterial inoculation. For inoculation, Pst DC3000 was grown in KB at 28°C for 24 h. Bacterial suspensions were adjusted to 5×10⁵colony-forming units (CFU)/mL in sterile MgSO₄ (10 mM) containing 0.01% of the surfactant Silwet L-77 (Osi Specialties, Danbury, CT, USA), as described previously [11].Pathogen inoculation was performed by dipping the third and fourth leaves into the bacterial suspension.

The disease rate was scored at 72 hpi by determining the percentage of dark-brown spots on the leaf surface and by counting the colony forming units in KB medium. At least three samples for colony counting and 20 samples for disease rate scoring were taken for each treatment over a 3-day period. For bacteria gene expression analysis, samples were taken at 2, 6, 10, 18, 48 and 72 h after inoculation. Each experiment was independently conducted at least three times.

Long term experiments were performed in the same conditions like those described above for 30 days. The samples were taken at 4, 10, 20 and 30 days after inoculation. Each experiment was independently conducted at least three times.

Bacterial RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Bacterial RNA extractions were carried out from in vitro-cultured cells after 18 h and from cells grown in planta at different time intervals.

For RNA isolation from in vitro cultured bacteria, Pst DC3000 was grown on KB agar plates for 48 h at 28°C. Hx was added to 1×10⁶ bacterial cells suspensions to final concentrations of 1.5 mM, 5 mM and 10 mM. Cells were incubated by shaking for 18 h before RNA extraction. Bacterial suspensions were stabilized with RNA protect bacterial reagent (Qiagen) before centrifugation. Cells pellets were immediately frozen in liquid N₂ and kept at −80°C prior to RNA extraction. We used the Qiagen RNeasy Bacteria Mini Kit for isolation of RNA samples according to manufacturer's instructions.

To extract bacterial RNA from infected plants we used a protocol for extracting RNA from P.syringae recovered from infected leaves as described by Yu et al. [55]. RNA quantification was performed with a UV-VIS UNICAM Model Heλiosβ spectrophotometer. Reverse transcription was carried out from 1 µg of total RNA for gene expression analysis, by using OMNISCRIPT (Qiagen) and random hexamer primers (Promega).

Expression analysis by qRT-PCR

Specific primers for real-time PCR were designated by using Primer3 program according to the sequence of the corresponding gene. Primers used for the assay are described in Table 1. 4 µl of diluted cDNA were used per 25 µl qPCR Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with SybrGreen Premix ExTaq (Takara) in a Cepheid Smart Cycler system Relative levels of the monitored genes were normalized with recA and used as an internal reference.

Table 1. Primers used for Real-Time PCR.

Gene	Funtion	Primer
cfa1	CFA synthesis	F 5′-AAAACCATCGTCGACATTCTG-3′
		R 5′-GTTGGCGTTGAGGTCGATA-3′
cmaB	CMA synthesis	F 5′-AATTCGACACCCGACAAGAC-3′
		R 5′-ACTAGGGGCTTCAGGTCCAT-3′
cfl	CMA and CFA union	F 5′-ACAGCTGAAGCAGCACTTGA-3′
		R 5′-CGAGGATCTCTCGGTAGTCG-3′
hrpL	Transcription factor σ^L	F 5′-TCTCCAGTGCGTGTTTCTTG-3′
		R 5′-AGCTTTCCTGATACGGCTGA-3′
hrpA	hrp pilus	F 5′-CCTCCAAACTCACCAACCTT-3′
		R 5′-CGGACTCTTTACTGGCCTTG-3′
avrPtoB	AvrPtoB type III effector	F 5′-ACCCTATCGCGTCACAATTC-3′
		R 5′-CATGAACGCCAGGTCCTTAT-3′
psyI	AHL synthase	F 5′-GGCTTGAATGGAATGTTCGT-3′
		R 5′-CAGGTGTTGATCAGCCGTAA-3′
psrA	Sigma regulator of psyI	F 5′-AGACGCATAACCTGCTCGAT-3′
		R 5′-ACATGACGCTGGTCAATGAA-3′
cma X	Magnesium transporter	F 5′-AGCGGGACATTTATGGTCAG-3
		R 5′-CTGTTGTTCAGCTCGTTCCA-3
recA	Internal reference	F 5′-CGGCAAGGGTATCTACCTCA-3′
		R 5′-CTTTGCAGATTTCCGGGTTA-3′

Open in a new tab

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using a one-way analysis of variance in the Statgraphics-plus software of Windows V.5 (Statistical Graphics Corp., Rockville, MD, USA). The means were expressed with standard errors and compared using a Fisher's least-significant difference test at the 95% confidence interval. All the experiments were repeated at least three times.

Results

1. Analysis of bacterial behaviour in vitro

1.1 Antibacterial activity of Hx

The growth of Pst DC3000 in the absence or presence of different concentrations of hexanoic acid (Hx) (0.6, 1.5, 5, 10, and 20 mM) was tested in LB medium. Higher concentrations were not used because damage to the tomato plants in our experimental assays was observed at concentrations higher than 20 mM. The bacterial growth curves were generated using a BioScreen system for 96 h (Fig. 1), and the results show that Hx at concentrations of 10 and 20 mM promoted slow bacterial growth and that the lag phase was markedly longer in these samples compared with those exposed to lower concentrations (20 and 8 h, respectively). Moreover, Hx at a concentration of 20 mM produced an inhibition of 15% in bacterial growth. The addition of Hx at concentrations of 0.6, 1.5, and 5 mM did not reduce the growth of the target compared with the control.

The results are presented as growth curves (in hours) of *Pst* DC3000 during its culture in the presence of 0.6, 1.5, 5, 10, and 20 mM Hx. The optical density at 600 nm was measured at 10-min intervals. The results represent the means with standard deviation.

We can conclude that Hx at a concentration of 10 and 20 mM could have a temporary bacteriostatic effect against Pst DC3000 because at these concentrations the lag phase lasts longer. However a bactericidal effect cannot be ruled out, at these concentrations.

1.2 Analysis of Hx bactericidal effect

The bactericidal effect of Hx was investigated by labelling the bacteria with the Live/Dead Cell Viability Assay kit, a two-colour fluorescence assay based on membrane integrity. The bactericidal effect was assessed using bacteria incubated for 96 h in LB medium with an Hx concentration of 10 and 20 mM (based on the results described above) and compared to that obtained with the untreated control. A very low number of dead bacteria (red labelled) were observed both in the untreated control and in the groups with 10 and 20 mM of Hx, and no significant differences were observed between the groups (Fig. 2A). Moreover, the non-treated controls had higher concentrations of living bacteria (Figs. 2Ca, 2Cb, and 2Cc). The presence of dead bacteria in the untreated controls appeared to be due to the experimental conditions used for growth, i.e., nutrient availability was a limiting factor due to the higher concentration that reached the control bacteria. Thus, Hx at concentrations of 10 and 20 mM caused no statistically significant changes in bacterial viability over a long period of time. This result may be because the bacteria enter the viable but non-culturable stage (VBNC) (Fig. 2Cc). In addition, at these concentrations, we microscopically observed the formation of multicellular aggregates that were not observed in the controls and the other treatment groups (Fig. 2Ca), and these aggregates were better defined in the group treated with 20 mM Hx (Fig. 2C.c).

Long-term effect of Hx in LB medium (A). Short-term effect of Hx in minimal medium (B). The charts illustrate the percentage of live cells, which was determined using a Live/Dead Bacterial Viability Kit. The images show the viable (green) and dead (red) cells and illustrated that aggregates are formed after exposure to Hx concentrations of 10 mM and 20 mM only in the long-term experiments (C.2, C.3).

Taking into consideration these results, the next question we addressed was whether the direct effect of Hx at 10 and 20 mM on the bacteria is a short-term bactericidal effect, which implies a reduction in the initial bacterial population followed by its recovery over the long term. To test this, the bactericidal effect was tested in bacteria that were incubated for 16 h in M9 minimal medium with Hx at concentrations of 10 and 20 mM. As shown in Figure 2B, a low number of dead bacteria were observed both in the untreated control bacteria and in the bacteria incubated with Hx at 10 mM. However, the bacteria incubated with Hx at 20 mM presented a clear short-term bactericidal effect of Hx because the number of nonviable cells represents 44% of the total number of cells (Figs. 2Cd, 2Ce, and 2Cf).

Taking together all of these results, we can conclude that the Hx effect on the target bacteria is dependent on the concentration: Hx at 10 mM has a temporary bacteriostatic effect, whereas Hx at 20 mM has a short-term bactericidal effect on half of the cells, which may explain the partial recovery of population growth over the long term.

1.3 Hx affects bacterial gene expression in vitro

We also performed in vitro assays to determine the Hx effect on bacterial gene expression. To achieve this goal, we selected genes related to the pathogenesis and survival of Pst DC3000, such as quorum sensing establishment-related genes (psyI), coronatine synthesis-related genes (cfa1, cmaB and cfl), genes selected as representative of the type III secretion system and the type III secretion system-associated pilus, respectively (hrpL and hrpA), and genes responsible for effector synthesis (avrPtoB). Hx was added at different concentrations (1.5, 5, and 10 mM) to the medium, and the bacteria were cultivated in the Hx-supplemented medium for 18 h at 28°C. After 18 h of incubation, we observed a significantly lower bacterial concentration in the group treated with 10 mM Hx (Fig. 3A).

The bacteria were grown in LB medium and LB plus Hx at 1.5, 5, and 10 mM for 18 h and then plated on KB agar plates to count the colony forming units (A). The transcript levels of *psyI* were determined by qRT-PCR. The relative expression levels of *psyI* were normalized to those of *recA* (B). The results represent the means and standard deviations from three different experiments.

The monitoring of the expression of psyI revealed very low levels in both the controls and the bacteria incubated with different concentrations of Hx. The expression of this gene was slightly higher in the bacteria incubated with Hx at 5 and 10 mM. However, at 1.5 mM Hx, the expression of this gene was lower (Fig. 3B).

The transcript levels of cfa1 and cfl (Figs. 4A and 4C) were induced in bacteria grown with Hx at a concentration of 10 mM compared with those grown without Hx or with 1.5 and 5 mM Hx. However, the cmaB (Fig. 4B) expression level was very low, and practically equal amounts of its transcripts were detected in all of the samples or slightly lower amounts were detected in the presence of Hx.

Template cDNAs were generated from the total RNA extracted from bacteria grown as described in Figure 3. The *recA* gene was used as an endogenous reference gene. The results represent the means and standard deviation from three different experiments.

Similar results to those obtained for cfa1 and cfl were observed in the analysis of hrpL, hrpA, and avrPtoB (Figs. 5A, 5B, and 5C). In contrast, the analysis of the expression of cmaX, a CorA-like Mg²⁺ transporter, revealed similar levels of expression regardless of the concentration of Hx (Fig. 5D).

The transcript levels of *hrpL* (A), *hrpA* (B), *avrPtoB* (C), and *cmaX* (D) were examined as described in Figure 3, and the *recA* gene was used as an internal reference. The results represent the means and standard deviation from three different experiments.

Taken together, these results demonstrate that the expression of the pathogenesis-related genes cfl, cfa1, hrpL, hrpA, and avrPtoB is enhanced with exposure to Hx at a concentration of 10 mM, which also affected bacterial growth. In contrast, the cmaB and cmaX expression levels were essentially equal regardless of the Hx concentration. These results indicate the involvement of the pathogenesis system in bacterial survival under abiotic stress conditions.

To confirm this hypothesis, the behaviour of mutants defective in these genes (ΔhrpL, ΔhrpA, Δcma-cfa, and Δpto (ΔAvrPto-ΔAvrPtoB)) was analysed under the same conditions to test the antimicrobial activity of Hx. Each mutant showed a similar level of survival to Pst DC3000, regardless of the Hx concentration (data not shown).

2. Analysis of bacterial behaviour in planta

Assays were conducted under the conditions described by Scalschi et al. [4]. The efficacy of Hx treatment was confirmed at both 48 hpi and 72 hpi by the reduction in disease symptoms and the reduction in the number of colony-forming units observed in the treated plants compared with the untreated plants, and major differences were observed at 72 hpi (Figs. 6A and 6B). Furthermore, we examined the expression of the genes analysed above after the infection of tomato plants with Pst DC3000 to determine whether their expression was altered by the treatment.

Four-week-old tomato plants were treated with Hx through soil drench and dip inoculated with *Pst* DC3000. Seventy-two hours after inoculation, the disease rating was scored by measuring the percentage of infected leaves in relation to the total number of analysed leaves (A) and by recounting the bacterial populations through plating in agar-King's B medium (B). The data show the average values ± standard error (n = 20). The different letters represent statistically significant differences (P<0.05; least-significant difference test).

2.1 QS is affected by Hx treatment

The gene expression was evaluated 2, 4, 10, 18, 48, and 72 h after infection. At the early stages, due to the low bacterial concentration, the obtained values exhibited a broad range, and we thus selected the 48- and 72-h time points for further analyses. At these time points, the greatest changes in the defence system of the treated plants were induced against Pst DC3000 [4].

The epiphytic phase of Pst DC3000 is considered one of the first steps in the infection process [30], [31]. Thus, the transcriptional activity of the psyI and psrA genes was monitored during the infection of treated and untreated tomato plants. As illustrated in Figure 7A, the expression of psyI was significantly lower in the bacteria from the treated plants at 48 hpi. Although the psyI expression level was decreased in bacteria from both untreated and treated plants at 72 hpi, the difference between these bacteria was maintained.

The relative expression of *psyI* (A) and *psrA* (B) was determined by qRT-PCR during the infection of treated and untreated tomato plants with *Pst* DC3000. The relative expression levels of *psyI* and *psrA* were normalized to those of *recA*. The results represent the means and standard deviation from three different experiments.

In contrast, the monitoring of the relative expression of psrA revealed very low levels of expression at both 48 and 72 hpi. However, its expression was higher in the bacteria from untreated plants at 48 hpi (Fig. 7B).

2.2 Expression of COR synthesis genes is reduced by Hx treatment

To investigate the effect of Hx treatment on Pst DC3000, the expression levels of the coronatine synthesis genes cfa1, cmaB, and cfl were measured in bacteria extracted from both treated and untreated tomato plants and were compared with those obtained in culture media (Fig. 8). As expected, the transcription levels of cfa1 and cfl were increased at 48 hpi and were higher in the bacteria from untreated plants compared with those from the treated plants. Although the expression of cfl was significantly decreased in the bacteria from the untreated plants at 72 hpi, its transcription levels exceeded those obtained in the bacteria from the treated plants. In contrast, cfa1 expression was hardly detected at this time point (Figs. 8A and 8C). A similar increase was observed with cmaB at 48 hpi, but elevated levels in its expression were recorded in the bacteria from the treated plants at 72 hpi (Fig. 8B).

The relative expression level of *cfa1* (A), *cmaB* (B) and *cfl* (C) were measured at 48 and 72 h postinoculation, using qRT-PCR with specific primers. The gene expression was normalized with *recA* that was used as endogenous references. The results represent the means of three different experiments with standard deviation.

2.3 Type III secretion system is affected by Hx treatment

We assayed the expression of the hrpL and hrpA genes, which were selected as representative of the type III secretion system and the type III secretion system-associated pilus, respectively, and the expression of the avrPtoB gene, which is responsible for effector synthesis (Fig. 9).

The transcript levels of type III secretion system associated genes (*hrpL* (A), *hrpA* (B), *avrPtoB* (C)) and CorA-like Mg²⁺ transporter (*cmaX* (D)) was determined at various time points after infection of tomato plants with *P.syringae* DC3000.The *recA* gene was used as endogenous references. The results represent the means of three different experiments with standard deviation.

To our surprise, we did not observe a strong induction of hrpL upon infection; on the contrary, we found that hrpL was induced to higher levels in vitro than in planta. Although Hx treatment inhibits the expression of this gene at 48 h, its expression was enhanced in the treated plants compared to the untreated ones at 72 hpi (Fig. 9A).

In contrast, the expression of hrpA, the major component of the type III secretion system-associated pilus, was stronger in the infected plants than in vitro, with the exception of the bacteria incubated with Hx at 10 mM, which exhibited similar expression levels to those observed in the infected plants. In planta, this gene has a similar behaviour to that observed with hrpL (Fig. 9B).

Furthermore, the expression of the gene involved in the synthesis of the specific effector AvrPtoB was monitored (Fig. 9C). At both 48 and 72 hpi, substantial increases in the avrPtoB transcription levels were recorded in the untreated plants compared with the treated plants.

2.4 Other effects of Hx acid treatment

The relative expression levels of the genes related with the CorA-like Mg²⁺ transporter, namely cmaX and corA, were measured in bacteria recovered from treated and untreated plants (Fig. 9D). At 48 hpi, the transcription level of cmaX was decreased by more than 10-fold in the bacteria recovered from treated plants.

2.5 Is Pseudomonas able to overcome Hx-IR over time?

The findings that the bacterial populations in treated plants increase even though fewer symptoms are observed and that some of the pathogenesis-related genes are expressed at 72 h led us to ask whether the bacteria can overcome the induced defence mechanisms in plants. To study the long-term bacterial behaviour, similar experiments were conducted over a 30-day period.

After 20 days, an increase in disease severity followed by abscission of the infected leaves was observed in the untreated plants. The treated plants presented a better physical condition than the untreated ones, as determined by the lack of extension of infection to the younger uninoculated leaves and the absence of leaf abscission (Figs. 10B and 10C).

Plants were treated with 0.6 mM Hx and dip inoculated. The bacterial growth was evaluated at 4, 10, 20 and 30 days after inoculation with *P.syringae* DC3000 (10⁵ cfu/ml) (A). The pictures of representative untreated (B) and Hx treated (C) plants were taken 20 days after inoculation.

The bacterial growth was higher in the untreated plants than in the treated ones. Although the bacterial populations were increased in both the treated and non-treated plants after four days, at longer time points, the number of pathogens was markedly decreased in the treated plants. In fact, in most of the samples, the bacterial population was under the limit of detection (Fig. 10A).

Discussion

In previous works, we demonstrated that Hx presents antifungal activity against the phytopathogen B. cinerea in vitro at nonphytotoxic concentrations [1]. Similar studies were performed by other researchers who evaluated the in vitro effect of several inducers on the fungus Mycosphaerella fijiensis [32], but little is known about the effect of resistance inducers on bacteria. Previously, we demonstrated the efficacy of Hx as a plant defence inducer against Pst DC3000, and we studied the molecular and physiological mechanisms behind Hx-IR [4]. To elucidate the details of the mechanism of action of Hx, the present study was focused on bacterial response both to the direct effect of Hx, which was applied in vitro to the culture medium, as to the changes observed in the plant defence mechanisms in response to Hx, which was applied as an inducer agent.

The main findings of the in vitro experiments were the following: Hx at 10 mM has a bacteriostatic but not bactericidal effect against Pst DC3000, whereas 20 mM Hx exerts an initial and partial bactericidal effect, which may explain the lower final concentrations of bacteria observed in the long-term experiments.

Furthermore, the formation of bacterial aggregates at these concentrations may be correlated to the adaptation of the bacteria to the stress conditions generated by the action of Hx at high concentrations, may explain the slow growth or the entry into the VBNC stage of the cells, and may be considered a mechanism through which the bacteria protect themselves under stress conditions, as reported for Erwinia amylovora [33] and Ralstonia solanacearum [34]. The bacterial counts obtained using the Live/Dead Kit are directly related to the real state of the bacteria and not only to their ability to form colonies in solid medium.

These results are further supported by the gene expression analysis of virulence- and quorum sensing-related genes, which revealed that there was no effect of Hx at concentrations lower than 10 mM. The COR synthesis genes, with the exception of cmaB, were relatively over expressed when Hx was added at a concentration of 10 mM to the medium. Another aspect that must be taken into consideration is that the analysis of these genes was performed in the exponential growth phase. The higher expression of cfa1 compared to that of cmaB is in agreement with the results of other researchers, who observed that CFA is released with coronatine in the culture medium [35]. Moreover, previous studies performed by other researchers revealed that COR production is regulated by temperature and that the expression of cma genes increases during the exponential growth phase while their expression is temperature independent during the stationary phase [36]. The same researchers also reported that the activity of cma expression is dependent on the genetic background of the host strain.

In contrast, direct contact with the host did not appear to be required for hrpA, hrpL, and avrPtoB expression because their level of expression in the in vitro controls was similar or even exceeded those observed in planta. These results are supported by the findings reported by Haapalainen et al. [37]. Moreover, the increase in hrpA, hrpL, and avrPtoB expression due to exposure to Hx at 10 mM may be attributed to the abiotic stress caused by higher concentrations of Hx and indicates an important role for T3SS in bacterial adaptation and survival. Rahme et al. [38] showed that the hrp gene expression in P. syringae pv. phaseolicola is under the control of multiple physiological and environmental factors, specifically pH, osmotic strength, and catabolite repression. According to these authors, the optimal expression of all hrp genes in vitro is obtained under stress conditions that stimulate the environment of the leaf apoplast with respect to a low osmolyte content and pH 5.5. Similar results were obtained by van Dijk et al. [39], who demonstrated that T3SS is environmentally regulated at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels and that environmental conditions, such as temperature, and pH play an important role in both gene expression and protein secretion. In contrast, the increase in T3SS-associated gene expression may be related to the growth pattern. Taking into consideration that at the lag phase lasts longer at this Hx concentration, the expression of these genes at 18 h may be required for the bacteria to pass from the lag phase to the exponential phase. Recently, Lee et al. [40] revealed the importance of the T3SS and specific effectors for the development of aggregates on the leaf surface. Thus, the increase in the transcription levels of genes that encode the structural and regulatory proteins associated with T3SS may be correlated with the aggregate formation observed after exposure to 10 mM Hx. Additionally, the elevation of the relative expression of psyI at this concentration supports our results because elevated levels of the quorum-sensing signal molecule AHL result in the expression of virulence factors that may be necessary for bacterial adaptation and survival under stress conditions.

To investigate the involvement of these factors in bacterial adaptation to stress conditions and survival, we used different mutants with impairments in the analysed genes. Although the mutants did not show reduced survival, the activation of these genes may contribute but not be essential for survival, and their involvement in bacterial adaptation cannot be ruled out. Because P. syringae has numerous other effectors, one or more of these may fulfil this role.

Regarding the changes that Pst DC3000 undergoes in planta, the study of gene expression patterns related to virulence or quorum-sensing establishmen in planta may help illuminate how the bacteria can survive and overcome plant defences and, in our case, how the bacteria responds to the induced plant defences since previous works described the main signalling pathways that are involved in basal and induced resistance to this pathogen. The study of hormonal patterns and the expression of marker genes revealed that the activation of these pathways occurs starting 48 hpi [4], which is correlated with transcriptional changes in bacterial genes and disease onset.

The dip-inoculation method used in our studies forces the bacteria to enter plants through natural openings present on the plant surface to establish infection sites within the apoplast. The fact that the treatment lost its effectiveness when the plants were infected by vacuum infiltration [4] indicates the possibility that the treatment may act in the early stages of bacterial infection, such as entry into host tissue and bacterial colonization of the intercellular spaces between plant cells.

The results obtained from our study of the factors involved in the early stages of infection, such as psyI and psrA, point to the fact that QS is reached earlier in the untreated plants compared with the treated ones, thereby delaying its establishment. It is known that QS in bacteria regulates the gene expression of virulence factors. Thus, this delay can be added to an activation of plant defences that may prevent or at least mitigate pathogen attack. Moreover, Chatterjee et al. [41] demonstrated that psrA has a positive effect on disease because the mutation of this gene affects the time of the onset of symptoms and their severity. These phenotypes correlate with the observed reduced expression of hrpL, which encodes an alternate sigma factor. Thus, in addition to delaying the establishment of QS, Hx treatment may diminish Pst DC3000 virulence by reducing the PsrA expression levels.

In previous works, we found that Hx treatment affects the action of COR by preventing stomatal reopening after bacterial infection [4]. One of the purposes of this study was to establish whether the changes in the infected plants due to Hx treatment could produce an alteration in the expression of genes involved in the synthesis of this molecule. Interestingly, we observed that Hx treatment reduces the expression of the COR synthesis genes cfa1, cmaB, and cfl at 48 hpi. This finding has an important implication in the enhanced resistance of treated plants, which presented markedly reduced disease severity compared with the untreated plants, because COR has been shown to suppress plant defence responses [23]. In contrast, at 72 hpi, elevated cmaB expression levels were recorded in the treated plants. Surprisingly, we also observed an increment in hrpL expression at this time point. According to Sreedharan et al. [42], HrpL modulates cfa1 and cmaB expression. It is not clear why this increase occurs only in the case of cmaB, although it is possible that the bacteria have an excess of CFA due to the higher expression levels of cfa1 at 48 hpi, which could result in the synthesis of COR. This would therefore involve a delay in symptom development, which was not observed in the long-term experiments. Thus, this discrepancy in the synthesis of the two components of COR in treated plants leads to a delay of disease onset and may influence the survival of the bacteria. On the other hand, the transcription of these genes in infected plants was extensively induced compared with that recorded in medium, which suggests that host signals are involved in their full activation [43].

Another factor that is important in the pathogenicity of P. syringae is the type III secretion system, which is encoded by the hrp/hrc regulon. In general, hrp genes are induced in plants and minimal nutrient media but repressed in complex media. Their expression is influenced by carbon and nitrogen sources, pH, osmolarity, temperature, and plant signal molecules [44]. In the bacteria from treated plants, a delay in hrpL and hrpA expression was observed. Although the expression of hrpL was 10-fold higher in vitro than in planta, other researchers have clearly shown that T3SS requires HrpL for its function [45]; however, the low expression levels observed in planta may be an indication of the existence of additional levels of regulation that have not been previously described. These results may also indicate that HrpL does not accumulate to high intracellular levels, suggesting that some type of feedback regulation could take place between the secretion and production of HrpL, perhaps through the degradation of intracellular HrpL [37].

In Pst DC3000, the T3SS is induced when the bacteria enter the leaf mesophyll through stomata. This bacterium can control the volume of type-three protein secretion by the expression level of HrpA pilin and the number of pili formed on the cell surface. The amount of HrpA protein needed per individual T3SS machinery depends on the distance between the bacterium and the plant cell [46]. It is possible that Hx treatment delays the contact of the bacterium with the plant cells and that this delay is responsible for the elevated levels of hrpA transcripts observed later in the treated plants.

Given that the current view of molecular plant-pathogen interactions is that pathogens secrete effectors into the apoplast and/or cytoplasm of host plants to suppress host defences, facilitate colonization, and trigger symptom production [47], [48], several effectors have been studied. AvrPtoB has been found to act inside plant cells to suppress programmed cell death associated with plant immunity and increases pathogen growth, dissemination, and disease formation [19], [49]. Once infection is established, this effector induces host programmed cell death to gain access to nutrients or aid pathogen dissemination. The fact that Hx treatment diminishes avrPtoB expression in planta is supported by the results reported by Abramovitch and Martin [49] because the symptoms are greatly reduced, even though the size of the bacterial population is increased to a lesser extent compared with untreated plants.

The virulence of pathogenic bacteria is also affected by divalent cations, of which Mg²⁺ plays a central role. CorA or CmaX is the major Mg²⁺ transporter. The importance of CorA or CmaX in virulence was previously reported [26], [50]. We observed that Hx treatment clearly reduces cmaX expression, and this decrease may affect the production of several plant cell wall-degrading exoenzymes, such as pectate lyase, polygalacturonase, cellulose, and protease, which are responsible for the maceration of plant tissue. This reduction could also affect bacterial survival and multiplication in planta. Our data are supported by the results obtained by Kersey et al. [51] in planta. These researchers noted a significant reduction in the cfu of the CorA⁻ mutant recovered from infected tissue compared with the CorA⁺ parent.

Because several genes were found to be expressed in the bacteria from the treated plants at 72 hpi, we then investigated whether the bacterial population could increase to a point where the bacteria might overcome the plant defence responses. The results obtained in the long-term assays discard this hypothesis and point to the induction of defence as a control strategy that reduces the pathogenicity by limiting the rate of pathogen multiplication [52] and by changing the expression pattern of virulence-related genes.

The conclusions we can draw for the effects of Hx on bacteria are that Hx has a direct in vitro effect on bacteria at high concentrations and that its effect on treated plants demonstrates that it acts as an inducer of resistance. In the latter case, the Hx effect is not conditioned by its presence in the plant, as demonstrated by our previous finding that Hx does not accumulate in treated plants because a chromatographic analysis revealed no detectable trace of either Hx or 13C-Hx above the detection limits (10 µg L⁻¹) [6]. Thus, one of the most interesting outcomes of this study is that the two effects are opposite: the direct effect of Hx consists of the activation of the bacterial genes involved in virulence, and its effect as an inducer of resistance is based on the inactivation of these genes, a delay in their expression, or a discrepancy in their activation that leads to the development of less symptoms and the decreased ability of the bacteria to grow and may even compromise its long-term survival. It is interesting to note that the transcriptional changes in the bacterial genes in the treated plants occur at the same time point (48 hpi) as the changes in the plants. Additionally, the differences in the bacterial population size are more pronounced between the treated and non-treated plants at 72 h. Because most of the bacterial genes studied are repressed at 48 h, this repression apparently prevents bacterial growth. This finding suggests that the pathogenesis and survival of the bacteria is affected by plant response when Hx is applied as a resistance inducer and that Hx affects both aspects of the molecular “arms race” (i.e., the plant immune system and pathogen virulence effectors) [53] to benefit the plant immune system.

Supporting Information

File S1

File S1 includes the following: Data S1. Table presenting data underlying the results described in figure 1. Data S2. Table presenting data underlying the results described in figure 2. Data S3. Table presenting data underlying the results described in figure 3. Data S4. Table presenting data underlying the results described in figure 4. Data S5. Table presenting data underlying the results described in figure 5. Data S6. Table presenting data underlying the results described in figure 6. Data S7. Table presenting data underlying the results described in figure 7. Data S8. Table presenting data underlying the results described in figure 8. Data S9. Table presenting data underlying the results described in figure 9. Data S10. Table presenting data underlying the results described in figure 10.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file.^{(178KB, doc)}

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA). We thank Esther Nogales (IVIA) for her help in Bioscreen and VBNC analysis.

Data Availability

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

LS is the recipient of a PhD fellowship from the Ministerio de Educación (Grant AP2008-01064) (http://www.mecd.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano-mecd/catalogo-servicios/becas-ayudas-subvenciones/para-estudiar/universidad/doctorado.html). This work was supported by AGL2010-22300-C03-02: National R&D Plan (http://www.idi.mineco.gob.es/portal/site/MICINN/menuitem.7eeac5cd345b4f34f09dfd1001432ea0/?vgnextoid=fe5aec1eb658c310VgnVCM1000001d04140aRCRD&lang_choosen=en), and P1•1B2013-75: Projecte d′investigació científica i desenvolupament tecnologic del Pla de promoció de la investigació de la Universitat Jaume I (http://www.uji.es/ocit/pinv13/#1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1. Leyva MO, Vicedo B, Finiti I, Flors V, Del Amo G, et al. (2008) Preventive and post-infection control of Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants by hexanoic acid. Plant Pathology 57: 1038–1046. [Google Scholar]
2. Llorens E, Fernandez-Crespo E, Vicedo B, Lapena L, Garcia-Agustin P (2013) Enhancement of the citrus immune system provides effective resistance against Alternaria brown spot disease. Journal of Plant Physiology 170: 146–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Pastor V, Luna E, Mauch-Mani B, Ton J, Flors V (2012) Primed plants do not forget. Environmental and Experimental Botany 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.02.013.
4. Scalschi L, Vicedo B, Camanes G, Fernandez-Crespo E, Lapena L, et al. (2013) Hexanoic acid is a resistance inducer that protects tomato plants against Pseudomonas syringae by priming the jasmonic acid and salicylic acid pathways. Molecular Plant Pathology 14: 342–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Ton J, Mauch-Mani B (2004) beta-amino-butyric acid-induced resistance against necrotrophic pathogens is based on ABA-dependent priming for callose. Plant Journal 38: 119–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Vicedo B, Flors V, Leyva MD, Finiti I, Kravchuk Z, et al. (2009) Hexanoic Acid-Induced Resistance Against Botrytis cinerea in Tomato Plants. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 22: 1455–1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Kravchuk Z, Vicedo B, Flors V, Camanes G, Gonzalez-Bosch C, et al. (2011) Priming for JA-dependent defenses using hexanoic acid is an effective mechanism to protect Arabidopsis against B. cinerea. Journal of Plant Physiology 168: 359–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Xin X-F, He SY (2013) Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000: A Model Pathogen for Probing Disease Susceptibility and Hormone Signaling in Plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology, Vol 51 51: 473–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Zhao YF, Thilmony R, Bender CL, Schaller A, He SY, et al. (2003) Virulence systems of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato promote bacterial speck disease in tomato by targeting the jasmonate signaling pathway. Plant Journal 36: 485–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Buell CR, Joardar V, Lindeberg M, Selengut J, Paulsen IT, et al. (2003) The complete genome sequence of the Arabidopsis and tomato pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 10181–10186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Katagiri F, Thilmony R, He SY (2002) The Arabidopsis thaliana-pseudomonas syringae interaction. The Arabidopsis book/American Society of Plant Biologists 1: e0039–e0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Melotto M, Underwood W, He SY (2008) Role of stomata in plant innate immunity and foliar bacterial diseases. Annual Review of Phytopathology 46: 101–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Rouse DI, Nordheim EV, Hirano SS, Upper CD (1985) A model relating the probability of foliar disease incidence to the population frequencies of bacterial plant-pathogens. Phytopathology 75: 505–509. [Google Scholar]
14. Loh J, Pierson EA, Pierson LS, Stacey G, Chatterjee A (2002) Quorum sensing in plant-associated bacteria. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5: 285–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. von Bodman SB, Bauer WD, Coplin DL (2003) Quorum sensing in plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology 41: 455–482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Bertani I, Sevo M, Kojic M, Venturi V (2003) Role of GacA, LasI, RhlI, ppk, PsrA, vfr and ClpXP in the regulation of the stationary-phase sigma factor rpoS/RpoS in Pseudomonas. Archives of Microbiology 180: 264–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Cui H, Xiang T, Zhou J-M (2009) Plant immunity: a lesson from pathogenic bacterial effector proteins. Cellular Microbiology 11: 1453–1461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Lindeberg M, Stavrinides J, Chang JH, Alfano JR, Collmer A, et al. (2005) Proposed guidelines for a unified nomenclature and phylogenetic analysis of type III Hop effector proteins in the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 18: 275–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Lin N-C, Martin GB (2005) An avrPto/avrPtoB Mutant of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Does Not Elicit Pto-Mediated Resistance and Is Less Virulent on Tomato. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 18: 43–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Xiao YX, Heu SG, Yi JS, Lu Y, Hutcheson SW (1994) Identification of a putative alternate sigma factor and characterization of a multicomponent regulatory cascade controlling the expression of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Pss61 hrp and hrmA genes. Journal of Bacteriology 176: 1025–1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Bender CL, Alarcon-Chaidez F, Gross DC (1999) Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxins: Mode of action, regulation, and biosynthesis by peptide and polyketide synthetases. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 63 266−+. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Bender CL, Stone HE, Sims JJ, Cooksey DA (1987) Reduced pathogen fitness of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato Tn5 insertions defective in coronatine production. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 30: 273–283. [Google Scholar]
23. Brooks DM, Bender CL, Kunkel BN (2005) The Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxin coronatine promotes virulence by overcoming salicylic acid-dependent defences in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant Pathology 6: 629–639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Yao N, Imai S, Tada Y, Nakayashiki H, Tosa Y, et al. (2002) Apoptotic cell death is a common response to pathogen attack in oats. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 15: 1000–1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Ichihara A, Shiraishi K, Sato H, Sakamura S, Nishiyama K, et al. (1977) The structure of coronatine [22]. Journal of the American Chemical Society 99: 636–637. [Google Scholar]
26. Papp-Wallace KM, Nartea M, Kehres DG, Porwollik S, McClelland M, et al. (2008) The CorA Mg2+ channel is required for the virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Journal of Bacteriology 190: 6517–6523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Pfeiffer J, Guhl J, Waidner B, Kist M, Bereswill S (2002) Magnesium uptake by CorA is essential for viability of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Infection and Immunity 70: 3930–3934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Reinhart RA (1988) Magnesium-metabolism - a review with special reference to the relationship between intracellular content and serum levels. Archives of Internal Medicine 148: 2415–2420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Nikaido H, Vaara M (1985) MOLECULAR-BASIS OF BACTERIAL OUTER-MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY. Microbiological Reviews 49: 1–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Beattie GA, Lindow SE (1999) Bacterial colonization of leaves: A spectrum of strategies. Phytopathology 89: 353–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Hirano SS, Upper CD (2000) Bacteria in the leaf ecosystem with emphasis on Pseudomonas syringae - A pathogen, ice nucleus, and epiphyte. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 64: 624–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Mogollón Ortiz ÁM, Castaño Zapata J (2012) Evaluación in vitro de Inductores de Resistencia sobre Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía, Medellín 65: 6327–6336. [Google Scholar]
33. Ordax M, Marco-Noales E, Lopez MM, Biosca EG (2006) Survival strategy of Erwinia amylovora against copper: Induction of the viable-but-nonculturable state. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72: 3482–3488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Alvarez B, Lopez MM, Biosca EG (2008) Survival strategies and pathogenicity of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II subjected to prolonged starvation in environmental water microcosms. Microbiology-Sgm 154: 3590–3598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Ferguson IB, Mitchell RE (1985) STIMULATION OF ETHYLENE PRODUCTION IN BEAN LEAF-DISKS BY THE PSEUDOMONAD PHYTOTOXIN CORONATINE. Plant Physiology 77: 969–973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Weingart H, Stubner S, Schenk A, Ullrich MS (2004) Impact of temperature on in planta expression of genes involved in synthesis of the Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxin coronatine. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 17: 1095–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Haapalainen M, van Gestel K, Pirhonen M, Taira S (2009) Soluble Plant Cell Signals Induce the Expression of the Type III Secretion System of Pseudomonas syringae and Upregulate the Production of Pilus Protein HrpA. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 22: 282–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Rahme LG, Mindrinos MN, Panopoulos NJ (1992) Plant and environmental sensory signals control the expression of hrp genes in Pseudomonas syringae pv phaseolicola . Journal of Bacteriology 174: 3499–3507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. van Dijk K, Fouts DE, Rehm AH, Hill AR, Collmer A, et al. (1999) The Avr (effector) proteins HrmA (HopPsyA) and AvrPto are secreted in culture from Pseudomonas syringae pathovars via the Hrp (type III) protein secretion system in a temperature- and pH-sensitive manner. Journal of Bacteriology 181: 4790–4797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Lee J, Teitzel GM, Munkvold K, del Pozo O, Martin GB, et al. (2012) Type III Secretion and Effectors Shape the Survival and Growth Pattern of Pseudomonas syringae on Leaf Surfaces. Plant Physiology 158: 1803–1818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Chatterjee A, Cui Y, Hasegawa H, Chatterjee AK (2007) PsrA, the Pseudomonas sigma regulator, controls regulators of epiphytic fitness, quorum-sensing signals, and plant interactions in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73: 3684–3694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Sreedharan A, Penaloza-Vazquez A, Kunkel BN, Bender CL (2006) CorR regulates multiple components of virulence in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 19: 768–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Nurnberger T, Brunner F, Kemmerling B, Piater L (2004) Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences. Immunological Reviews 198: 249–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Lindgren PB (1997) The role of hrp genes during plant-bacterial interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology 35: 129–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Xiao YX, Hutcheson SW (1994) A single promoter sequence recognized by a newly identified alternate sigma factor directs expression of pathogenicity and host range determinants in Pseudomonas syringae . Journal of Bacteriology 176: 3089–3091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Boureau T, Routtu J, Roine E, Taira S, Romantschuk M (2002) Localization of hrpA-induced Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in infected tomato leaves. Molecular Plant Pathology 3: 451–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, Staskawicz BJ (2006) Host-microbe interactions: Shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 124: 803–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Jones JDG, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444: 323–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49. Abramovitch RB, Martin GB (2005) AvrPtoB: A bacterial type III effector that both elicits and suppresses programmed cell death associated with plant immunity. Fems Microbiology Letters 245: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50. Haque MM, Tsuyumu S (2005) Virulence, resistance to magainin II, and expression of pectate lyase are controlled by the PhoP-PhoQ two-component regulatory system responding to pH and magnesium in Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937. Journal of General Plant Pathology 71: 47–53. [Google Scholar]
51. Kersey CM, Agyemang PA, Dumenyo CK (2012) CorA, the magnesium/nickel/cobalt transporter, affects virulence and extracellular enzyme production in the soft rot pathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum. Molecular Plant Pathology 13: 58–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52. Miller MR, White A, Boots M (2005) The evolution of host resistance: Tolerance and control as distinct strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 236: 198–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53. Nomura K, Mecey C, Lee Y-N, Imboden LA, Chang JH, et al. (2011) Effector-triggered immunity blocks pathogen degradation of an immunity-associated vesicle traffic regulator in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 10774–10779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE (1954) Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med 44: 301–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55. Yu X, Lund SP, Scott RA, Greenwald JW, Records AH, et al. (2013) Transcriptional responses of Pseudomonas syringae to growth in epiphytic versus apoplastic leaf sites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: E425–E434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

File S1

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file.^{(178KB, doc)}

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

[pone.0106429-Leyva1] 1. Leyva MO, Vicedo B, Finiti I, Flors V, Del Amo G, et al. (2008) Preventive and post-infection control of Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants by hexanoic acid. Plant Pathology 57: 1038–1046. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Llorens1] 2. Llorens E, Fernandez-Crespo E, Vicedo B, Lapena L, Garcia-Agustin P (2013) Enhancement of the citrus immune system provides effective resistance against Alternaria brown spot disease. Journal of Plant Physiology 170: 146–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Pastor1] 3.Pastor V, Luna E, Mauch-Mani B, Ton J, Flors V (2012) Primed plants do not forget. Environmental and Experimental Botany 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.02.013.

[pone.0106429-Scalschi1] 4. Scalschi L, Vicedo B, Camanes G, Fernandez-Crespo E, Lapena L, et al. (2013) Hexanoic acid is a resistance inducer that protects tomato plants against Pseudomonas syringae by priming the jasmonic acid and salicylic acid pathways. Molecular Plant Pathology 14: 342–355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Ton1] 5. Ton J, Mauch-Mani B (2004) beta-amino-butyric acid-induced resistance against necrotrophic pathogens is based on ABA-dependent priming for callose. Plant Journal 38: 119–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Vicedo1] 6. Vicedo B, Flors V, Leyva MD, Finiti I, Kravchuk Z, et al. (2009) Hexanoic Acid-Induced Resistance Against Botrytis cinerea in Tomato Plants. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 22: 1455–1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Kravchuk1] 7. Kravchuk Z, Vicedo B, Flors V, Camanes G, Gonzalez-Bosch C, et al. (2011) Priming for JA-dependent defenses using hexanoic acid is an effective mechanism to protect Arabidopsis against B. cinerea. Journal of Plant Physiology 168: 359–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Xin1] 8. Xin X-F, He SY (2013) Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000: A Model Pathogen for Probing Disease Susceptibility and Hormone Signaling in Plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology, Vol 51 51: 473–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Zhao1] 9. Zhao YF, Thilmony R, Bender CL, Schaller A, He SY, et al. (2003) Virulence systems of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato promote bacterial speck disease in tomato by targeting the jasmonate signaling pathway. Plant Journal 36: 485–499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Buell1] 10. Buell CR, Joardar V, Lindeberg M, Selengut J, Paulsen IT, et al. (2003) The complete genome sequence of the Arabidopsis and tomato pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 10181–10186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Katagiri1] 11. Katagiri F, Thilmony R, He SY (2002) The Arabidopsis thaliana-pseudomonas syringae interaction. The Arabidopsis book/American Society of Plant Biologists 1: e0039–e0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Melotto1] 12. Melotto M, Underwood W, He SY (2008) Role of stomata in plant innate immunity and foliar bacterial diseases. Annual Review of Phytopathology 46: 101–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Rouse1] 13. Rouse DI, Nordheim EV, Hirano SS, Upper CD (1985) A model relating the probability of foliar disease incidence to the population frequencies of bacterial plant-pathogens. Phytopathology 75: 505–509. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Loh1] 14. Loh J, Pierson EA, Pierson LS, Stacey G, Chatterjee A (2002) Quorum sensing in plant-associated bacteria. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5: 285–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-vonBodman1] 15. von Bodman SB, Bauer WD, Coplin DL (2003) Quorum sensing in plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology 41: 455–482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Bertani1] 16. Bertani I, Sevo M, Kojic M, Venturi V (2003) Role of GacA, LasI, RhlI, ppk, PsrA, vfr and ClpXP in the regulation of the stationary-phase sigma factor rpoS/RpoS in Pseudomonas. Archives of Microbiology 180: 264–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Cui1] 17. Cui H, Xiang T, Zhou J-M (2009) Plant immunity: a lesson from pathogenic bacterial effector proteins. Cellular Microbiology 11: 1453–1461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Lindeberg1] 18. Lindeberg M, Stavrinides J, Chang JH, Alfano JR, Collmer A, et al. (2005) Proposed guidelines for a unified nomenclature and phylogenetic analysis of type III Hop effector proteins in the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 18: 275–282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Lin1] 19. Lin N-C, Martin GB (2005) An avrPto/avrPtoB Mutant of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 Does Not Elicit Pto-Mediated Resistance and Is Less Virulent on Tomato. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 18: 43–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Xiao1] 20. Xiao YX, Heu SG, Yi JS, Lu Y, Hutcheson SW (1994) Identification of a putative alternate sigma factor and characterization of a multicomponent regulatory cascade controlling the expression of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Pss61 hrp and hrmA genes. Journal of Bacteriology 176: 1025–1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Bender1] 21. Bender CL, Alarcon-Chaidez F, Gross DC (1999) Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxins: Mode of action, regulation, and biosynthesis by peptide and polyketide synthetases. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 63 266−+. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Bender2] 22. Bender CL, Stone HE, Sims JJ, Cooksey DA (1987) Reduced pathogen fitness of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato Tn5 insertions defective in coronatine production. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 30: 273–283. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Brooks1] 23. Brooks DM, Bender CL, Kunkel BN (2005) The Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxin coronatine promotes virulence by overcoming salicylic acid-dependent defences in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant Pathology 6: 629–639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Yao1] 24. Yao N, Imai S, Tada Y, Nakayashiki H, Tosa Y, et al. (2002) Apoptotic cell death is a common response to pathogen attack in oats. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 15: 1000–1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Ichihara1] 25. Ichihara A, Shiraishi K, Sato H, Sakamura S, Nishiyama K, et al. (1977) The structure of coronatine [22]. Journal of the American Chemical Society 99: 636–637. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-PappWallace1] 26. Papp-Wallace KM, Nartea M, Kehres DG, Porwollik S, McClelland M, et al. (2008) The CorA Mg2+ channel is required for the virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Journal of Bacteriology 190: 6517–6523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Pfeiffer1] 27. Pfeiffer J, Guhl J, Waidner B, Kist M, Bereswill S (2002) Magnesium uptake by CorA is essential for viability of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Infection and Immunity 70: 3930–3934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Reinhart1] 28. Reinhart RA (1988) Magnesium-metabolism - a review with special reference to the relationship between intracellular content and serum levels. Archives of Internal Medicine 148: 2415–2420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Nikaido1] 29. Nikaido H, Vaara M (1985) MOLECULAR-BASIS OF BACTERIAL OUTER-MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY. Microbiological Reviews 49: 1–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Beattie1] 30. Beattie GA, Lindow SE (1999) Bacterial colonization of leaves: A spectrum of strategies. Phytopathology 89: 353–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Hirano1] 31. Hirano SS, Upper CD (2000) Bacteria in the leaf ecosystem with emphasis on Pseudomonas syringae - A pathogen, ice nucleus, and epiphyte. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 64: 624–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-MogollnOrtiz1] 32. Mogollón Ortiz ÁM, Castaño Zapata J (2012) Evaluación in vitro de Inductores de Resistencia sobre Mycosphaerella fijiensis Morelet. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía, Medellín 65: 6327–6336. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Ordax1] 33. Ordax M, Marco-Noales E, Lopez MM, Biosca EG (2006) Survival strategy of Erwinia amylovora against copper: Induction of the viable-but-nonculturable state. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72: 3482–3488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Alvarez1] 34. Alvarez B, Lopez MM, Biosca EG (2008) Survival strategies and pathogenicity of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II subjected to prolonged starvation in environmental water microcosms. Microbiology-Sgm 154: 3590–3598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Ferguson1] 35. Ferguson IB, Mitchell RE (1985) STIMULATION OF ETHYLENE PRODUCTION IN BEAN LEAF-DISKS BY THE PSEUDOMONAD PHYTOTOXIN CORONATINE. Plant Physiology 77: 969–973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Weingart1] 36. Weingart H, Stubner S, Schenk A, Ullrich MS (2004) Impact of temperature on in planta expression of genes involved in synthesis of the Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxin coronatine. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 17: 1095–1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Haapalainen1] 37. Haapalainen M, van Gestel K, Pirhonen M, Taira S (2009) Soluble Plant Cell Signals Induce the Expression of the Type III Secretion System of Pseudomonas syringae and Upregulate the Production of Pilus Protein HrpA. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 22: 282–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Rahme1] 38. Rahme LG, Mindrinos MN, Panopoulos NJ (1992) Plant and environmental sensory signals control the expression of hrp genes in Pseudomonas syringae pv phaseolicola . Journal of Bacteriology 174: 3499–3507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-vanDijk1] 39. van Dijk K, Fouts DE, Rehm AH, Hill AR, Collmer A, et al. (1999) The Avr (effector) proteins HrmA (HopPsyA) and AvrPto are secreted in culture from Pseudomonas syringae pathovars via the Hrp (type III) protein secretion system in a temperature- and pH-sensitive manner. Journal of Bacteriology 181: 4790–4797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Lee1] 40. Lee J, Teitzel GM, Munkvold K, del Pozo O, Martin GB, et al. (2012) Type III Secretion and Effectors Shape the Survival and Growth Pattern of Pseudomonas syringae on Leaf Surfaces. Plant Physiology 158: 1803–1818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Chatterjee1] 41. Chatterjee A, Cui Y, Hasegawa H, Chatterjee AK (2007) PsrA, the Pseudomonas sigma regulator, controls regulators of epiphytic fitness, quorum-sensing signals, and plant interactions in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73: 3684–3694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Sreedharan1] 42. Sreedharan A, Penaloza-Vazquez A, Kunkel BN, Bender CL (2006) CorR regulates multiple components of virulence in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 19: 768–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Nurnberger1] 43. Nurnberger T, Brunner F, Kemmerling B, Piater L (2004) Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences. Immunological Reviews 198: 249–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Lindgren1] 44. Lindgren PB (1997) The role of hrp genes during plant-bacterial interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology 35: 129–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Xiao2] 45. Xiao YX, Hutcheson SW (1994) A single promoter sequence recognized by a newly identified alternate sigma factor directs expression of pathogenicity and host range determinants in Pseudomonas syringae . Journal of Bacteriology 176: 3089–3091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Boureau1] 46. Boureau T, Routtu J, Roine E, Taira S, Romantschuk M (2002) Localization of hrpA-induced Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in infected tomato leaves. Molecular Plant Pathology 3: 451–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Chisholm1] 47. Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, Staskawicz BJ (2006) Host-microbe interactions: Shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 124: 803–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Jones1] 48. Jones JDG, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444: 323–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Abramovitch1] 49. Abramovitch RB, Martin GB (2005) AvrPtoB: A bacterial type III effector that both elicits and suppresses programmed cell death associated with plant immunity. Fems Microbiology Letters 245: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Haque1] 50. Haque MM, Tsuyumu S (2005) Virulence, resistance to magainin II, and expression of pectate lyase are controlled by the PhoP-PhoQ two-component regulatory system responding to pH and magnesium in Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937. Journal of General Plant Pathology 71: 47–53. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Kersey1] 51. Kersey CM, Agyemang PA, Dumenyo CK (2012) CorA, the magnesium/nickel/cobalt transporter, affects virulence and extracellular enzyme production in the soft rot pathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum. Molecular Plant Pathology 13: 58–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Miller1] 52. Miller MR, White A, Boots M (2005) The evolution of host resistance: Tolerance and control as distinct strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 236: 198–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Nomura1] 53. Nomura K, Mecey C, Lee Y-N, Imboden LA, Chang JH, et al. (2011) Effector-triggered immunity blocks pathogen degradation of an immunity-associated vesicle traffic regulator in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 10774–10779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-King1] 54. King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE (1954) Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med 44: 301–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0106429-Yu1] 55. Yu X, Lund SP, Scott RA, Greenwald JW, Records AH, et al. (2013) Transcriptional responses of Pseudomonas syringae to growth in epiphytic versus apoplastic leaf sites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: E425–E434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Resistance Inducers Modulate Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato Strain DC3000 Response in Tomato Plants

Loredana Scalschi

Gemma Camañes

Eugenio Llorens

Emma Fernández-Crespo

María M López

Pilar García-Agustín

Begonya Vicedo

Roles

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Bacterial growth assay

Live and dead cell quantification

Plant inoculation

Bacterial RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Expression analysis by qRT-PCR

Table 1. Primers used for Real-Time PCR.

Statistical analysis

Results

1. Analysis of bacterial behaviour in vitro

1.1 Antibacterial activity of Hx

Figure 1. Influence of different hexanoic acid (Hx) concentrations on the growth rate of Pst DC3000.

1.2 Analysis of Hx bactericidal effect

Figure 2. Bactericidal effect of Hx treatment at concentrations of 10 and 20 mM on Pst DC3000.

1.3 Hx affects bacterial gene expression in vitro

Figure 3. Effect of Hx on bacterial growth and QS-related genes.

Figure 4. Relative expression of COR synthesis genes (cfa1 (A), cmaB (B), and cfl (C)) during bacterial growth in the presence of different Hx concentrations.

Figure 5. Expression of type III secretion system- and other virulence factor-related genes in response to different hexanoic acid concentrations.

2. Analysis of bacterial behaviour in planta

Figure 6. Hexanoic acid-induced resistance against Pst DC3000.

2.1 QS is affected by Hx treatment

Figure 7. Effect of hexanoic acid treatment on quorum sensing establishment.

2.2 Expression of COR synthesis genes is reduced by Hx treatment

Figure 8. Hx acid treatment reduces expression of COR synthesis genes.

2.3 Type III secretion system is affected by Hx treatment

Figure 9. Effect of Hx acid treatment on Type III secretion system and other virulence factors.

2.4 Other effects of Hx acid treatment

2.5 Is Pseudomonas able to overcome Hx-IR over time?

Figure 10. Hx treatment has a long lasting effect.

Discussion

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

Data Availability

Funding Statement

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases