Abstract
The actin cytoskeleton plays a key role during the replication cycle of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1). HIV-1 infection is affected by cellular proteins that influence the clustering of viral receptors or the subcortical actin cytoskeleton. Several of these actin-adaptor proteins are controlled by the second messenger phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate (PIP2), an important regulator of actin organization. PIP2 production is induced by HIV-1 attachment and facilitates viral infection. However, the importance of PIP2 in regulating cytoskeletal proteins and thus HIV-1 infection has been overlooked. This review examines recent reports describing the roles played by actin-adaptor proteins during HIV-1 infection of CD4+ T cells, highlighting the influence of the signaling lipid PIP2 in this process.
Keywords: PIP2, actin-binding proteins, HIV-1
Introduction
The central role of actin polymerization (see Glossary) during infection by human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) has been known for several decades. However, recent reports suggest a more sophisticated involvement of the actin cytoskeleton throughout the viral replication cycle. Cortical actin determines T cell susceptibility to HIV-1 infection, and viral internalization is proportional to actin polymerization in the target cell [1]. In contrast, other studies demonstrate that efficient viral entry after membrane fusion requires local actin depolymerization [2, 3]. These evidences suggest that HIV-1 entry into the host cell requires a dynamic reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton.
Infection is modulated at early stages by cellular proteins that affect viral receptor clustering, such as EWI-2, moesin and filamin-A [4-6], or the subcortical actin cytoskeleton, such as drebrin, syntenin-1, α-actinin, gelsolin, talin, vinculin, cofilin, profilin, WASP, WAVE-2, and Arp2/3 [2, 3, 5, 7-12] (Table 1). Some of these proteins are actin-adaptor proteins and directly bind to actin microfilaments, whereas others bind to F-actin through linker proteins such as ERMs (ezrin-radixin-moesin family). While receptor clustering requires actin polymerization, subsequent internalization of the viral core requires local actin depolymerization (Table 2). Actin filaments then accompany the viral components through the cytoplasm towards the nucleus [13-15] and might ultimately regulate HIV-1 assembly and release. The virus thus controls actin dynamics throughout the cycle for its own profit, promoting local actin polymerization or depolymerization as required at each step.
Table 1. PIP2 regulation of actin-related proteins and their role during the HIV-1 cycle.
Protein | Protein function | PIP2 regulation | Refs | Effect on HIV cycle | Refs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
α-Actinin | Organizes actin filaments in parallel bundles | Inhibited by PIP2 | [16] | α-Actinin restricts HIV-1 entry | [5] |
Abl kinase | Phosphorylates WAVE2 and activates Arp2/3 | Inhibited by PIP2 | [42] | Abl kinase activity favors HIV-1 entry | [11] |
AP-2 | Clathrin-adaptor complex | AP-2 interacts with PIP5KIγ, regulating PIP2 production | [55] | AP-2 negatively regulates nuclear translocation and viral DNA integration | [54] |
Cofilin | Depolymerizes F-actin at the (−) ends, generates actin nuclei (Arp2/3 activation) | Severing function is inhibited by PIP2 | [20] | Cofilin promotes HIV-1 latent infection of resting CD4 T cells, facilitating HIV-1 migration to the nucleus and viral DNA synthesis | [3] |
Dynamin | Clathrin-mediated endocytosis | Recruited and activated (GTPase activity) by PIP2 | [16] | Dynamin activation is needed for the HIV-1 endocytic entry pathway | [44] |
ERMs | Links F-actin and transmembrane receptors, organizes actin into stress fibers | Activated by PIP2 (open conformation) | [16] | ERMs faciliate Env-induced CD4–CXCR4 clustering and actin redistribution during HIV-1 entry | [4, 35] |
Filamin | Cross-links F-actin, organizing the cytoskeleton in a gel network | Inhibited by PIP2 (actin binding capacity) | [84] | Filamin favors HIV-1-induced CD4–CXCR4 clustering and contributes to particle assembly by interacting with Gag | [6] [75] |
Gelsolin | Sever filament (+) ends, promote actin polymerization | Dissociated from F-actin by PIP2 | [16] | Gelsolin silencing or overexpression restricts HIV-1-infection | [8] |
Myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) | Myosin phosphorylation | Activated by PIP2 hydrolysis | [83] | MLCK induces CD4 or CXCR4 Env-dependent clustering at the VS, favoring viral dissemination | [80, 82] |
Paxillin | Adaptor protein at focal adhesions | Its tyrosine phosphorylation correlates with PIP2 synthesis | [85] | Paxillin favors HIV-1 infection | [7] |
PP1/PP2A | Serine/threonine phosphatases | PP1/PP2A inhibitor impairs PI4P5K-Iβ PIP2 synthesis | [61] | PP1/PP2A favors HIV-1 transcription | [58] |
Profilin | Promotes actin assembly at (+) ends, enhances F-actin growth | Inhibited by PIP2 (binding capacity to actin and Poly-Pro bearing proteins) | [16] | Profilin supports virion production Local profilin increase makes cells more permissive to infection | [12] [10] |
Rac | Promotes branched-actin polymerization | Rac activates PIP5K, and is activated by PIP3 | [16] | Rac is needed for HIV-1-induced membrane fusion | [38] |
Sprouty2 | Inhibits receptor tyrosine kinases | Inhibits PIP2 hydrolysis | [76] | Sprouty2 impairs HIV-1 release | [76] |
Syntenin-1 | Scaffold protein | PIP2 inhibits PDZ protein-protein association | [32] | Syntenin-1 inhibits HIV-1 entry | [9] |
Talin | Associates with and activates β1/3 integrins | PIP2 promotes talin activation | [16] | Talin blocks retroviral infection by inhibiting paxillin phosphorylation | [7] |
Tsg101 | Controls endosomal cargo sorting and trafficking | Facilitates PIP2 hydrolysis | [77] | Tsg101 is essential for HIV budding | [77] |
Vinculin | Scaffold protein involved in focal adhesion | Increases its binding to WASP and talin, dissociation from F-actin | [16] | Vinculin blocks retroviral infection by inhibiting paxillin phosphorylation | [7] |
WASP | Activates Arp2/3,inducing actin branching | Activation by PIP2 | [41] | Inhibiton of Arp2/3 blocks HIV-1 replication | [39] |
Table 2. Summary of PIP2 and actin turnover at the different steps of HIV-1 infection in CD4+ T cells.
HIV-1 cycle | PIP2a | Actin cytoskeletona |
---|---|---|
Attachment | Production | Polymerization |
Core internalization | Degradation | Depolymerization |
RT | Productionb (N.D.) | Polymerization |
Nuclear migration and DNA integration | Degradationc (N.D.) | Depolymerization |
Assembly | Production | Polymerizationd (N.D.) |
Budding | Degradation | Depolymerizatione (N.D.) |
Abbreviation: N.D., not demonstrated
Cofilin inactivation favors viral DNA synthesis, and PIP2 inhibits cofilin actin-severing activity.
Actin treadmilling is induced by an increase in cofilin activity.
HIV-1 Gag associates with filamin-A during assembly. This actin cross-linking protein organizes the actin cytoskeleton in gel networks.
During the late steps of HIV-1 infection, virus-induced filamentous actin structures disappear after virus release.
During the late steps of HIV-1 infection, virus-induced filamentous actin structures disappear after virus release.
PIP2 metabolism
Several of the above-mentioned proteins bind to and are regulated by the second messenger phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate (PIP2), a phosphoinosite (PPI) mainly located at the plasma membrane [16]. PPIs are phosphorylated derivatives of phosphatidylinositol (see Glossary) that function as second messengers, docking sites for specific proteins, and allosteric regulators. Each PPI is predominantly positioned at specific cellular membranes and performs its roles locally [16]. PPI production and degradation are highly controlled. PIP2 is produced mainly by the action of two kinases (Box 1), PIP5KI and PIP4KII, which respectively phosphorylate PI(4)P (phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate) and PI(5)P (phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate) to generate PIP2 [17]. PI(4)P is much more abundant than PI(5)P, so the major pathway for PIP2 production is PI(4)P phosphorylation by PIP5K. PIP5K is recruited to the plasma membrane by RhoA, Rac1 and Arf6 (ADP ribosylation factor 6) [17]. Regulation by Arf6 is especially important because it both activates PIP5K activity and recruits phospholipase D (PLD) (Box 1). PLD activity further activates PIP5K through the generation of phosphatidic acid, a PIP5K activator (Box 1). Moreover, PLD is itself activated by PIP2, generating a positive feedback loop that amplifies the initial Arf6 signal (Box 1). Prolonged expression of a constitutively active Arf6 mutant stimulates PIP2 synthesis and induces, as a consequence, plasma membrane internalization and PIP2 accumulation at intracellular vesicles [18]. Some PIP2-regulated proteins modulate PIP2 dynamics; for example, profilin and gelsolin stimulate phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) activity, which converts PIP2 into phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3) [19], while cofilin acts as a PIP2 sensor[20]. Several enzymes catalyze PIP2 degradation (Box 1): phospholipase C (PLC) hydrolyzes PIP2 to produce the second messengers inositol (1,4,5)-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG); PI3K phosphorylates PIP2 to generate PIP3; and PPI-phosphatases dephosphorylate PIP2, generating PI(4)P and PI(5)P [17]. PIP2 homeostasis is thus highly regulated by a complex balance of synthesis and hydrolysis (Box 1).
Box 1.
PIP2 metabolism
PIP2 (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate) is generated by PIP5KI or PIP4KII, which respectively phosphorylate PI(4)P (phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate) and PI(5)P (phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate). Arf6 (ADP ribosylation factor 6) and PLD (phospholipase D) activate PIP5KI. PIP2 is catalyzed by PLC (phospholipase C), producing IP3 (inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate) and DAG (diacilglycerol), and PIP2 can be converted into PIP3 (phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate) by phosphorylation by PI3K. PIP2 can also be dephosphorylated by different phosphatases.
PIP2 is involved in many processes related to the actin cytoskeleton. In general, PIP2 synthesis initiates actin assembly, whereas PIP2 depletion triggers actin depolymerization [17]. HIV-1 viral envelope glycoproteins (Env) trigger PIP5KIα activity and PIP2 enrichment in the vicinity of the viral attachment site, facilitating viral entry [9, 21, 22]. In this review, we propose that PIP2 coordinates actin cytoskeletal function through multiple steps of HIV-1 infection.
The actin cytoskeleton and PIP2 throughout the HIV-1 cycle
The following sections summarize the HIV-1-induced local changes in the actin cytoskeleton during different steps of the viral cycle and how PIP2 affects this dynamic process.
HIV entry and membrane fusion: the cortical actin network
Receptor clustering and the formation of the fusion pore
Attachment of HIV-1 to target cells is modulated by the surface organization of the HIV receptor CD4 and co-receptors CXCR4 and CCR5, which are partially clustered in resting conditions [23]. Since most studies on the role of the actin cytoskeleton during HIV-1 infection were performed with X4-tropic viruses, we will focus on HIV-1 that uses CXCR4 co-receptor to infect CD4+ T cells. HIV-1 entry is a cooperative process that requires the engagement of several CD4–CXCR4 complexes to efficiently trigger viral–cellular membrane fusion [24, 25]. Numerous transmembrane receptors are distributed in specialized domains called tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEMs) (see Glossary) and membrane rafts (see Glossary) that are differently linked to the actin cytoskeleton [26]. CD4 and CXCR4 localization and mobility within these specialized membrane domains modulate HIV-1 infection [27, 28]. Tetraspanin (see Glossary) CD63 negatively regulates HIV-1 infection, by modulating CXCR4 trafficking to the plasma membrane [29]. Tetraspanin CD81, which is highly expressed in CD4+ T cells, and its partner EWI-2 also negatively regulate HIV-1 entry [5, 30] through several putative mechanisms. First, CD81 directly associates with CD4 and integrins [26], and could be able to influence the surface organization of the HIV receptor and virus-cell adhesion. Second, both CD81 and EWI-2 bind to F-actin, CD81 through ERMs and EWI-2 through ERMs, α-actinin and filamin [5, 26]. PIP2 regulates the EWI-2–F-actin connection during T cell activation, favoring EWI-2 association with ERMs to the detriment of association with α-actinin [5]. It is conceivable that during HIV-1 attachment, when PIP2 production is triggered [21], α-actinin will dissociate from TEMs. In this case, TEMs would remain linked to the actin cytoskeleton through ERMs, which are activated by PIP2. Third, in epithelial cells CD81 recruits PIP4KII to the plasma membrane [31], which could initiate a positive feedback loop generating more PIP2 locally during HIV-1 infection. Further studies are needed to explore this pathway in CD4+ T cells.
Before viral contact, actin filaments (see Glossary) in resting CD4+ T cells are mainly organized in a cortical network beneath the plasma membrane, arranged in bundles and gel networks (Figure 1A). This actin web is connected to transmembrane receptors through several linker proteins, including filamin, α-actinin, syntenin and drebrin. At this stage, basal ERM phosphorylation is observed in T cells [4], and inactive ERMs are in a closed conformation, since they are neither phosphorylated nor PIP2-bound [4]; CD4 associates with syntenin-1, a PSD-95/Disc large/ZO-1 (PDZ)-bearing protein involved in receptor signaling and internalization [9, 32]; and CXCR4 interacts with drebrin, an actin-binding protein related to the ADF-cofilin family [10]. Once HIV-1 attaches to the target cell (Figure 1B), the viral envelope glycoproteins (Env) sequentially engage CD4 receptor and CXCR4 co-receptor, inducing their clustering [15]. The actin cytoskeleton is also involved in the clustering [33] and stabilization [2] of CD4–CXCR4 complexes during HIV-1 attachment. HIV-dependent CD4–CXCR4 clustering activates PIP5KI-α through a CD4-derived signal [21]. HIV-1 entry into CD4+ T cells can be inhibited by PIP5KI-α or Arf6 silencing, which in turn block PIP2 production [21, 22].
Figure 1. Actin cytoskeleton turnover during HIV attachment and entry steps.
(A) Initial situation. The actin cortical cytoskeleton is arranged in bundles, and transmembrane receptors are organized in TEMs. (B) HIV-1-induced receptor clustering activates PIP5K, which generates PIP2. PIP2 binding inhibits the interactions of several proteins (syntenin, α-actinin, and cofilin) in favor of other proteins that become activated (ERMs). The actin cytoskeleton and the clustering of HIV-1 receptors cooperate during viral attachment. (C) Signaling derived from CD4 and CXCR4 triggers Rac-1. Rac-1 associates with WAVE-2 complex, which activates the Arp2/3 actin nucleator. The actin cytoskeleton is locally remodeled into a branched and highly polymerized web. (D) Rac-1-derived signals activate cofilin. Cofilin, profilin and gelsolin depolymerize F-actin, allowing the release of the viral core into the cell. In the illustration, virus particles and molecules are not to scale.
PIP2 generation after HIV-1 attachment may coordinate serial changes in the actin cytoskeleton that allow and support HIV-1 infection. PIP2 first inhibits α-actinin and filamin binding to F-actin and activates ERM-linking activity (Table 1, Figure 1B). Interestingly, α-actinin-4 negatively regulates HIV-1 infection in CD4+ T cells ([5], Table 1). However, in HEK cells, filamin-A is needed for HIV-induced CD4–CXCR4 clustering and actin dynamics ([6], Table 1). Additional experiments are needed to define the role of filamin-A during HIV-1 infection in lymphocytes. Concomitantly, PIP2 binding activates ERMs, triggering a conformational change that opens its intramolecular self-inactivating interaction (Figure 1B). Fully activated ERMs are Thrphosphorylated, and HIV-1 induces ERM phosphorylation by a CD4-derived signal [4]. Blocking this signal also inhibits PIP2 induction [4, 21], demonstrating that HIV-induced ERM activation and HIV-triggered PIP2 production are interrelated. Moesin activation is required for CD4–CXCR4 clustering and polarized capping in response to HIV-1 Env stimulation ([4], Table 1), and silencing of moesin inhibits X4-tropic HIV-1 infection in human CD4+ T cells. However, there are discrepancies about the effect of each ERM member on HIV X4/R5 infection [4, 34-36], possibly due to the use of different cell lines and virus strains; further studies are therefore needed to clarify the involvement of ERMs in HIV entry. Overall, HIV-1-induced PIP2 production would result in less crosslinked and less bundled actin filaments, allowing a new distribution in which long actin filaments would be linked to membrane receptors through ERMs (Figure 1B).
Other proteins that are recruited to the plasma membrane likely upon PIP2 production include syntenin-1, gelsolin and cofilin, resulting in inhibition of their functions and their capacity to bind F-actin (Table 1, Figure 1B). The two tandem PDZ domains of syntenin-1 exclusively bind either PIP2 or proteins [32]. PIP2 production at the viral attachment area could therefore partially release syntenin-1 from CD4 [9], allowing CD4 to connect with F-actin through the interaction with ERMs. Further studies are needed to demonstrate this dissociation, which could underlie the ability of syntenin-1 to impede HIV-1-induced syncytia formation and viral infection ([9], Table 1). PIP2-mediated inhibition of gelsolin and cofilin would allow local actin polymerization and stabilization, which is triggered after HIV-1 attachment. This possibility is supported by overexpression of gelsolin in CD4+ T cells, which reduces F-actin content and impairs Env-induced CD4–CXCR4 clustering, HIV-1 entry, and infection ([8], Table 1). Cofilin is inactivated by phosphorylation or PIP2 binding, and cofilin–PIP2 binding is the main inactivation mechanism at the plasma membrane [37]. Cofilin can also be inactivated in a PAK2-dependent manner by the HIV accessory protein Nef [38], which binds to actin [15]. Soon after Env engagement (30 sec), cofilin is phosphorylated in a Rho-dependent manner [6], and this may act together with PIP2 binding to inactivate cofilin. The accumulated evidence thus shows that PIP2 production at the viral attachment site corresponds with changes in the actin cytoskeleton from cortical bundles to more elongated structures (Figure 1B-C, Table 2).
Membrane fusion and viral core internalization
Actin polymerization is needed for HIV-induced membrane fusion, since inhibition of various proteins involved in actin elongation arrests HIV infection at the fusion pore [10-12, 39]. Inhibition of the Arp2/3 actin nucleator complex (see Glossary), which is responsible for actin-branched polymerization, reduces HIV-1 infection [39]. Pseudotyping the virus with the envelope G glycoprotein of the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV-G) overcomes this reduction, suggesting that the Arp2/3-dependent step is related to HIV-1 Env-induced membrane fusion [39]. Moreover, HIV-1 Nef also inhibits the Arp2/3 nucleation promoter N-WASP [40]. Several groups have reported that Env activates the Rho GTPase Rac ([38], Table 1), which can also be activated by Nef, together with P21-activated kinase 2 (PAK2) and the Rho GTPase exchange factor Vav [38]. Rac triggers the WAVE-2 complex, another promoter of Arp2/3 nucleation capacity [11], and HIV-1 entry is impaired by silencing proteins involved in the Rac–Arp2/3 cascade (Tiam-1, Abl kinase and WAVE2) [11]. PIP2 activates N-WASP, and consequently Arp2/3 actin nucleation ([16, 41]; Table 1). Rho GTPases and PIP2 are reciprocally regulated, and Rac1 promotes PIP2 synthesis by activating PIP5K ([17], Table 1). In contrast, in fibroblasts PIP2 inhibits Abl kinase ([42]; Table 1); but further research is needed to ascertain whether this also occurs in lymphocytes. Activation of the Arp2/3 nucleation complex would trigger a second change in actin organization: from elongated non-parallel structures to highly polymerized branched actin (Figure 1B-C). The actin-severing protein profilin is also regulated by PIP2 (Table 1). Profilin recruitment to the plasma membrane is needed for efficient HIV-1 infection of macrophages [12], and in CD4+ T cells profilin recruitment to the viral attachment sites is promoted by silencing drebrin, a negative regulator of HIV-1 infection [10].
After pore formation, the local highly polymerized actin structure generated could present a physical barrier to the release of the viral core into the cytosol (Figure 1C-D). Recent reports support the notion that HIV-1 membrane fusion induces local actin depolymerization to overcome this [3, 8, 43]. As early as one hour after HIV-1 contact, a CXCR4-derived signal dephosphorylates cofilin, inducing its actin-severing activity and actin depolymerization ([3], Table 1). By this stage, PIP2 has already dissipated [21], allowing cofilin activation. Thus, in a further adjustment of actin distribution, the highly polymerized branched structure is locally cleared by cofilin activation (Figure 1D, Table 2).
HIV-1 can additionally enter CD4+ T cells by clathrin-dependent endocytosis [44]. The actin cytoskeleton appears to play a negligible role in HIV-1 infection via this route. However, dynamin activity has been shown to be essential for HIV-1 endocytic entry ([44], Table 1). PIP2 activates and recruits dynamin to the plasma membrane and is absolutely necessary for clathrin/dynamin-mediated endocytosis ([16], Table 1), suggesting that PIP2 might also regulate this alternative entry pathway.
To recapitulate, during HIV-1 entry the virus first induces local PIP2 production and actin polymerization, and thereafter it triggers actin depolymerization disrupting the cortical F-actin barrier to allow proper viral entrance.
Post-entry steps: interactions between virion components and the cytoskeleton meshwork
HIV-1 replication requires viral uncoating, reverse transcription (RT) and viral DNA insertion into the host cell genome. Although the accurate timing of these steps is not yet well defined, it is clear that the host cell cytoskeleton is involved in the active transport of viral components into the nucleus.
The HIV core contains the viral capsid, the genomic RNA, the accessory proteins Vif, Nef and Vpr, and viral enzymes, as well as several host cell proteins [45]. Some of these viral proteins, including Gag, reverse transcriptase, integrase and Nef, directly interact with actin [15], indicating a possible role for the actin cytoskeleton during uncoating. Host cell proteins packaged into viral particles, such as actin, actin-binding proteins and membrane proteins [45, 46], affect HIV-1 post-entry steps. For example, tetraspanins CD63, CD9, CD81 and CD82 incorporated into new virions attenuate subsequent viral infection [47], and CD63 positively regulates HIV-1 RT without any effect on virus attachment [48]. PIP2 might modulate the role played by tetraspanins during HIV-1 replication, as it stimulates CD81 interaction with ERMs [5], and its subcellular localization in prostate cancer cells is regulated by CD82 [49].
The efficiency of RT in synthesizing double-stranded viral DNA depends on actin polymerization [13], and viral proteins that are integral components of the RT complex (see Glossary) interact with actin [15], suggesting that the RT complex is anchored to the cortical actin. RT is triggered by Env–CXCR4 binding [2, 3], and is regulated by cofilin and LIM domain kinase 1 (LIMK1) [2, 3]. LIMK1 phosphorylates cofilin, inactivating its severing activity. Cofilin and LIMK1 phosphorylation can be induced by HIV-1 Nef [50]. Cofilin activity can also be inactivated by PIP2 binding [15]. Cofilin knockdown increases the cortical actin density and favors viral DNA synthesis ([3], Table 1), whereas LIMK1 downregulation decreases actin density and impairs both HIV DNA synthesis and viral nuclear migration, without significant differences in viral entry [2]. These data indicate that RT is driven by actin polymerization (Figure 2). Other cytoskeletal PIP2-modulated proteins with roles in RT include talin-1 and vinculin, whose downregulation promotes paxillin tyrosine phosphorylation and specifically enhances viral DNA synthesis, while paxillin knockdown decreases HIV-1 infection ([7], Table 1). Since this study was performed with VSV-G pseudotyped HIV-1, an altered viral entry could not account for the observed effects in silenced cells. PIP2 production would therefore be predicted to stimulate actin polymerization and promote viral RT (Figure 2, Table 2).
Figure 2. HIV-1 replication is regulated by actin-binding and PIP2-modulated proteins.
After HIV-1 fusion with the plasma membrane, actin polymerization facilitates RT. During this step, cofilin is inactivated by LIMK1-dependent phosphorylation. Talin and vinculin are inactive, while phosphorylated paxillin promotes viral DNA synthesis. PIC nuclear uptake depends on cofilin activation, thereby inducing actin depolymerization. HIV nuclear transport and DNA integration are also regulated by AP-2. After transcription of viral genes, virion assembly takes place at coalesced TEMs and membrane rafts at the plasma membrane, where Gag associates with PIP2 and filamin-A. Filamentous actin structures are formed during assembly. ESCRT proteins (Tsg101 and Alix) drive viral fission. During the final step of the viral cycle, Sprouty2 regulates PLC-dependent PIP2 hydrolysis. HIV-1 virions bud from the cell, generating the new progeny. Cellular filamentous actin structures dissipate after virus release. In the illustration, virus particles and molecules are not to scale.
The translocation of the viral preintegration complex (PIC) (see Glossary) to the nucleus in adherent cell lines requires active actin and microtubule transport [13, 14], but in resting CD4+ T cells microtubule integrity seems not to be necessary [51]. Since T cells possess a thin cytoplasm, transport along actin filaments may be sufficient for PIC nuclear transport [3]. This process is regulated by increased actin treadmilling (see Glossary) induced by cofilin activation ([3], Figure 2). Since PIP2 inhibits cofilin–actin binding, these data suggest that low PIP2 levels are necessary for proper HIV-1 nuclear migration (Figure 2, Table 2).
Actin-dependent viral nuclear localization and DNA integration also occurs through chemokine-mediated cofilin activation [52]. Very recently, the myxovirus resistance protein (MxB), an interferon (IFN)-induced dynamin-like GTPase involved in nucleo-cytoplasmic transport, was shown to inhibit HIV-1 nuclear translocation and DNA integration [53]. The MxB-related protein dynamin is activated by PIP2 (Table 1). Nuclear uptake of virus and DNA integration, but not viral entry, are also enhanced by knocking down the adapter-related protein complex 2 α (AP-2α) ([54], Figure 2), an endocytic clathrin-adaptor complex that directly interacts with and activates PIP5Kγ, modulating PIP2 production ([55], Table 1). In this way, the PIP2 pool might also be important for HIV-1 nuclear internalization and DNA integration (Table 2).
Interestingly, actin, actin-binding proteins and PIP2 can be found in the nucleus [56], implying their possible role in influencing actin dynamics at this location, and as a consequence in modulating HIV DNA integration, viral gene transcription and nuclear export. In this sense, nuclear actin is important for efficient nuclear export of unspliced viral RNA, a process mediated by the HIV accessory protein Rev [57]. Another viral accessory protein, Tat, which regulates HIV-1 transcription [58], co-immunoprecipitates with β-actin [59] and modulates actin remodeling [60]. Tat directly interacts with PIP2, and associates with protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) [58]. These phosphatases, which positively regulate HIV-1 transcription ([58], Table 1), modulate PIP5K-Iβ activity and PIP2 production [61], suggesting that Tat could modulate PIP2 production. However, the potential role of the actin cytoskeleton and PIP2 for HIV DNA integration, viral gene transcription and nuclear export remains poorly understood.
Contribution of the cytoskeleton to viral assembly and release
To allow viral particle formation, transcribed viral proteins are targeted to the plasma membrane, where Gag multimerizes, the viral genomic RNA is encapsidated, and Env proteins are incorporated to the nascent virions. The new viral progeny then buds and is released. Although the exact temporal order of these events remains to be determined, HIV-1 Gag is involved in each step [45, 62], and actin-disrupting drugs reduce viral production. However, the specific role of the actin cytoskeleton during the late phase of infection remains undetermined [38].
HIV-1 assembly and budding at the plasma membrane preferentially takes place at TEMs and membrane rafts [62]. Tetraspanin CD81 co-immunoprecipitates with Gag, and several tetraspanins colocalize with Gag and Env in virus-producer cells [62]. In macrophages, assembly occurs in deeply invaginated plasma membranes enriched in PIP2, tetraspanins, integrins and the actin-linker proteins talin, vinculin and paxillin [63, 64]. Actin-dependent organization of these compartments is important for controlled viral particle release [64]. However, the importance of tetraspanins for HIV-1 release remains a controversial issue, despite their presence at both viral exit sites and budding virions. Indeed, although some groups have suggested that tetraspanins are positive viral release factors, other groups have not observed any effect when knocking-down tetraspanins in virus-producer cells [62]. Nevertheless, since virion-associated tetraspanins impair Env-dependent fusion, HIV-1 assembly within TEMs would prevent syncytia formation, avoiding fusion between infected and uninfected cells [65, 66]. In this regard, Env accumulation at assembly sites represses its fusion capacity, allowing efficient viral transmission [67]. Recent evidence supports the view that Gag triggers the clustering of specialized microdomains, rafts and TEMs in a stepwise assembly process ([68, 69], Figure 2). During microdomain coalescence, either acylation of Gag or its binding to PIP2 is sufficient to allow Gag binding to the membrane and subsequent viral assembly [68].
HIV-1 Gag directly associates with PIP2, and the Gag residues responsible for this interaction have been characterized [70, 71]. Gag is specifically targeted to PIP2-enriched membranes and PIP2 is essential for efficient Gag binding to the plasma membrane ([70-72], Figure 2). This targeting is regulated by Gag association with RNA, which prevents Gag binding to non-PIP2-enriched membranes [71, 73]. Moreover, virions are enriched in membrane-associated PIP2 in a Gag-dependent manner [71]. Gag is also connected to cytoskeleton proteins. During assembly, HIV-1 triggers the formation of filamentous actin structures that disappear after virus release ([74], Figure 2). Gag association with filamin-A is essential for its proper localization at the plasma membrane, as well as for particle assembly and viral release ([75], Table 1, Figure 2). During these processes, PIP2 production and hydrolysis are both required (Table 2). Gag interacts with Tsg101 and Alix, components of the ESCRT (endosomal sorting complex required for transport) pathway that are essential for virion fission during the budding process ([45], Table 1, Figure 2). Tsg101 and Sprouty2 regulate PIP2 hydrolysis by PLCγ, which is essential for HIV-1 production ([76, 77], Table 1, Figure 2). PIP2 turnover is thus a critical event during HIV-1 assembly and release.
Actin dynamics during cell-to-cell virus transfer
HIV-infected cells can induce numerous types of cell-cell contacts with uninfected target cells- filopodial bridges, tunnels, membrane nanotubes and virological synapses (VS)- increasing the efficiency of viral dissemination [78]. HIV-induced cell-cell contacts are characterized by Env-dependent recruitment of membrane receptors [79, 80]. Several cellular molecules accumulate at HIV-induced cell-cell contacts: adhesion molecules and integrins, markers of TEMs and membrane rafts, signaling molecules and the cytoskeleton proteins actin, talin, α-actinin, ERMs, syntenin-1 and drebrin [4, 5, 9, 10, 66, 80]. Membrane microdomains are important for VS formation, and membrane proteins included in TEMs are important for cell-cell viral transmission [81]. A correct balance of TEM components seems to be necessary for efficient viral spreading through VS. PIP2, a possible modulator of interactions within TEMs, could play a role in this process.
Actin remodeling is essential for VS formation [79, 80]. CD4 and coreceptor clustering at the VS is dependent on filamin-A expression [6] and on myosin-driven transport [80]. In addition, cell-cell viral dissemination and uropod formation require myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) ([82], Table 1), which phosphorylates myosin proteins, triggering actin polymerization [83]. Actin clearance at the VS [43] depends on low levels of PIP2 enrichment at the contact, in a process affected by syntenin-1 [9]. Since PIP2-regulated actin-binding proteins accumulate at the VS and modulate viral dissemination, PIP2 is a candidate coordinator ensuring the correct signals that will trigger VS formation and efficient HIV cell-cell dissemination.
Concluding remarks
Accumulating data establish that HIV-1 controls actin dynamics during the various steps of its replication cycle (Table 2) through the stimulation or repression of several actin-binding proteins. Recent evidence highlights the importance of PIP2 in regulating the activity of several of these actin-related proteins, and its involvement in actin cytoskeleton turnover. However, so far few reports have demonstrated a direct role for PIP2 during HIV-1 infection, demonstrating that HIV-1 contact induces PIP2 generation during viral entry, and that PIP2 production and hydrolysis are essential for viral assembly and release (Table 2). We propose that this PPI plays crucial roles at each step of the HIV-1 infection cycle. Further investigation into PIP2-dependent regulation of actin turnover is needed to provide better understanding of the replication cycle (Box 2), an essential step toward identifying new anti-HIV targets and therapies.
Box 2.
Outstanding Questions
Does HIV-1 directly causes PIP2 depletion after membrane fusion or PIP2 depletion is a consequence of viral-induced actin cytoskeleton changes?
What are the dynamics and the timing of PIP2-induced modulation of actin-binding proteins during HIV-1 infection?
How is the PIP2 pool tuned throughout HIV-1 infection?
Is PIP2 mainly acting as a recruiter of cellular and viral proteins to the plasma membrane?
Is nuclear PIP2 playing a role in HIV-1 nuclear migration and DNA integration?
Acknowledgements
The authors thank S. Bartlett (CNIC) for manuscript editing. Research was supported by grants SAF2011-25834 from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, INDISNET-S2011/BMD-2332 from the Comunidad de Madrid, Cardiovascular Network RD12-0042-0056 from the Instituto Salud Carlos III, and ERC-2011-AdG 294340-GENTRIS.
Glossary
- Actin filaments
monomers (G-actin) are added to actin (+) ends and dissociated from actin (−) ends.
- Actin polymerization
actin monomers are added to the actin (+) ends and stabilized at the (−) ends, leading to the extension of the filamentous actin (F-actin).
- Actin treadmilling
process that occurs when the same filament is simultaneously extended at the (+) end and depolymerized at the (−) end.
- Arp2/3 actin nucleator complex
triggers the formation of new actin nucleation cores, thereby stimulating actin polymerization. Arp2/3 nucleation activity is stimulated by WASP, N-WASP and WAVE-2.
- Membrane rafts
are small liquid-ordered membrane microdomains, enriched in saturated lipids and specific glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked proteins.
- Phosphatidylinositol
can be reversibly phosphorylated to generate different phosphoinositides.
- Preintegration complex (PIC)
is an integration-competent HIV-1 complex formed upon viral DNA synthesis in the cytoplasm that is able to efficiently integrate the viral genome into the target cell genome.
- Reverse transcription (RT) complex
is originated from the viral core and is responsible for reverse transcription of the viral genome, converting viral single-stranded positive RNA into double-stranded DNA.
- Tetraspanins
are four-span transmembrane proteins containing a highly conserved CCG motif in the larger of the two extracellular domains.
- Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEMs)
are platforms organized by tetraspanin proteins, and include partner proteins such as membrane proteins, signaling molecules and cytoskeletal proteins.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Permanyer M, et al. The Cortical Actin Determines Different Susceptibility of Naive and Memory CD4+ T Cells to HIV-1 Cell-to-Cell Transmission and Infection. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vorster PJ, et al. LIM kinase 1 modulates cortical actin and CXCR4 cycling and is activated by HIV-1 to initiate viral infection. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:12554–12564. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.182238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yoder A, et al. HIV envelope-CXCR4 signaling activates cofilin to overcome cortical actin restriction in resting CD4 T cells. Cell. 2008;134:782–792. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Barrero-Villar M, et al. Moesin is required for HIV-1-induced CD4-CXCR4 interaction, F-actin redistribution, membrane fusion and viral infection in lymphocytes. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:103–113. doi: 10.1242/jcs.035873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gordon-Alonso M, et al. EWI-2 association with alpha-actinin regulates T cell immune synapses and HIV viral infection. J Immunol. 2012;189:689–700. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jimenez-Baranda S, et al. Filamin-A regulates actin-dependent clustering of HIV receptors. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:838–846. doi: 10.1038/ncb1610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brown C, et al. Focal adhesion proteins talin-1 and vinculin negatively affect paxillin phosphorylation and limit retroviral infection. J Mol Biol. 2011;410:761–777. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.03.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Garcia-Exposito L, et al. Gelsolin activity controls efficient early HIV-1 infection. Retrovirology. 2013;10:39. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-10-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gordon-Alonso M, et al. The PDZ-adaptor protein syntenin-1 regulates HIV-1 entry. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23:2253–2263. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-12-1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gordon-Alonso M, et al. Actin-binding protein drebrin regulates HIV-1-triggered actin polymerization and viral infection. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:28382–28397. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.494906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Harmon B, et al. Role of Abl kinase and the Wave2 signaling complex in HIV-1 entry at a post-hemifusion step. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000956. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kadiu I, et al. Cytoskeletal protein transformation in HIV-1-infected macrophage giant cells. J Immunol. 2007;178:6404–6415. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bukrinskaya A, et al. Establishment of a functional human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcription complex involves the cytoskeleton. J Exp Med. 1998;188:2113–2125. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.11.2113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.McDonald D, et al. Visualization of the intracellular behavior of HIV in living cells. J Cell Biol. 2002;159:441–452. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200203150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Spear M, et al. The trinity of the cortical actin in the initiation of HIV-1 infection. Retrovirology. 2012;9:45. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-9-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Saarikangas J, et al. Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton-plasma membrane interplay by phosphoinositides. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:259–289. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00036.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang L, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 4, 5 bisphosphate and the actin cytoskeleton. Subcell Biochem. 2012;59:177–215. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-3015-1_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.van den Bout I, Divecha N. PIP5K-driven PtdIns(4,5)P2 synthesis: regulation and cellular functions. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:3837–3850. doi: 10.1242/jcs.056127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Singh SS, et al. Profilin and gelsolin stimulate phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity. Biochemistry. 1996;35:16544–16549. doi: 10.1021/bi9609634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhao H, et al. ADF/cofilin binds phosphoinositides in a multivalent manner to act as a PIP(2)-density sensor. Biophys J. 2010;98:2327–2336. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Barrero-Villar M, et al. PI4P5-kinase Ialpha is required for efficient HIV-1 entry and infection of T cells. J Immunol. 2008;181:6882–6888. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.10.6882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Garcia-Exposito L, et al. HIV-1 requires Arf6-mediated membrane dynamics to efficiently enter and infect T lymphocytes. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:1148–1166. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Singer I, et al. CCR5, CXCR4, and CD4 are clustered and closely apposed on microvilli of human macrophages and T cells. J Virol. 2001;75:3779–3790. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.8.3779-3790.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lineberger JE, et al. Altering expression levels of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120-gp41 affects efficiency but not kinetics of cell-cell fusion. J Virol. 2002;76:3522–3533. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.7.3522-3533.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Salzwedel K, Berger EA. Complementation of diverse HIV-1 Env defects through cooperative subunit interactions: a general property of the functional trimer. Retrovirology. 2009;6:75. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-6-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yanez-Mo M, et al. Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains: a functional unit in cell plasma membranes. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19:434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2009.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Finnegan CM, et al. Sphingomyelinase restricts the lateral diffusion of CD4 and inhibits human immunodeficiency virus fusion. J Virol. 2007;81:5294–5304. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02553-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fournier M, et al. CD4 dimerization requires two cysteines in the cytoplasmic domain of the molecule and occurs in microdomains distinct from lipid rafts. Mol Immunol. 2010;47:2594–2603. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yoshida T, et al. A CD63 mutant inhibits T-cell tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 entry by disrupting CXCR4 trafficking to the plasma membrane. Traffic. 2008;9:540–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gordon-Alonso M, et al. Tetraspanins CD9 and CD81 modulate HIV-1-induced membrane fusion. J Immunol. 2006;177:5129–5137. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.8.5129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tham TN, et al. Tetraspanin CD81 is required for Listeria monocytogenes invasion. Infection and immunity. 2010;78:204–209. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00661-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zimmermann P, et al. PIP(2)-PDZ domain binding controls the association of syntenin with the plasma membrane. Molecular cell. 2002;9:1215–1225. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00549-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Iyengar S, et al. Actin-dependent receptor colocalization required for human immunodeficiency virus entry into host cells. J Virol. 1998;72:5251–5255. doi: 10.1128/jvi.72.6.5251-5255.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Capalbo G, et al. Knockdown of ERM family member moesin in host cells increases HIV type 1 replication. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011;27:1317–1322. doi: 10.1089/AID.2010.0147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kubo Y, et al. Ezrin, Radixin, and Moesin (ERM) proteins function as pleiotropic regulators of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Virology. 2008;375:130–140. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Naghavi MH, et al. Moesin regulates stable microtubule formation and limits retroviral infection in cultured cells. EMBO J. 2007;26:41–52. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.van Rheenen J, et al. A common cofilin activity cycle in invasive tumor cells and inflammatory cells. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:305–311. doi: 10.1242/jcs.031146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stolp B, Fackler OT. How HIV takes advantage of the cytoskeleton in entry and replication. Viruses. 2011;3:293–311. doi: 10.3390/v3040293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Komano J, et al. Inhibiting the Arp2/3 complex limits infection of both intracellular mature vaccinia virus and primate lentiviruses. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:5197–5207. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-04-0279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Haller C, et al. The HIV-1 pathogenicity factor Nef interferes with maturation of stimulatory T-lymphocyte contacts by modulation of N-Wasp activity. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:19618–19630. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513802200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tomasevic N, et al. Differential regulation of WASP and N-WASP by Cdc42, Rac1, Nck, and PI(4,5)P2. Biochemistry. 2007;46:3494–3502. doi: 10.1021/bi062152y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Plattner R, et al. A new link between the c-Abl tyrosine kinase and phosphoinositide signalling through PLC-gamma1. Nat Cell Biol. 2003;5:309–319. doi: 10.1038/ncb949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vasiliver-Shamis G, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope gp120-induced partial T-cell receptor signaling creates an F-actin-depleted zone in the virological synapse. J Virol. 2009;83:11341–11355. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01440-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Miyauchi K, et al. HIV enters cells via endocytosis and dynamin-dependent fusion with endosomes. Cell. 2009;137:433–444. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sundquist WI, Krausslich HG. HIV-1 assembly, budding, and maturation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a006924. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Linde ME, et al. The conserved set of host proteins incorporated into HIV-1 virions suggests a common egress pathway in multiple cell types. J Proteome Res. 2013;12:2045–2054. doi: 10.1021/pr300918r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sato K, et al. Modulation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity through incorporation of tetraspanin proteins. J Virol. 2008;82:1021–1033. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01044-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li G, et al. A post-entry role for CD63 in early HIV-1 replication. Virology. 2011;412:315–324. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liu WM, et al. Tetraspanin CD82 inhibits protrusion and retraction in cell movement by attenuating the plasma membrane-dependent actin organization. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ishaq M, et al. LIM kinase 1 - dependent cofilin 1 pathway and actin dynamics mediate nuclear retinoid receptor function in T lymphocytes. BMC Mol Biol. 2011;12:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-12-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yoder A, et al. Effects of microtubule modulators on HIV-1 infection of transformed and resting CD4 T cells. J Virol. 2011;85:3020–3024. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02462-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cameron PU, et al. Establishment of HIV-1 latency in resting CD4+ T cells depends on chemokine-induced changes in the actin cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:16934–16939. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002894107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Haller O. Dynamins are forever: MxB inhibits HIV-1. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:371–373. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kitagawa Y, et al. Inhibitory function of adapter-related protein complex 2 alpha 1 subunit in the process of nuclear translocation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genome. Virology. 2008;373:171–180. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Krauss M, et al. Stimulation of phosphatidylinositol kinase type I-mediated phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate synthesis by AP-2mu-cargo complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:11934–11939. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510306103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gieni RS, Hendzel MJ. Actin dynamics and functions in the interphase nucleus: moving toward an understanding of nuclear polymeric actin. Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;87:283–306. doi: 10.1139/O08-133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kimura T, et al. Rev-dependent association of the intron-containing HIV-1 gag mRNA with the nuclear actin bundles and the inhibition of its nucleocytoplasmic transport by latrunculin-B. Genes Cells. 2000;5:289–307. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2000.00326.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Debaisieux S, et al. The ins and outs of HIV-1 Tat. Traffic. 2012;13:355–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01286.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Mahmoudi T, et al. The SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex is a cofactor for Tat transactivation of the HIV promoter. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:19960–19968. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603336200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lopez-Huertas MR, et al. Modifications in host cell cytoskeleton structure and function mediated by intracellular HIV-1 Tat protein are greatly dependent on the second coding exon. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:3287–3307. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yamamoto M, et al. Hypertonic stress increases phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate levels by activating PIP5KIbeta. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:32630–32638. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605928200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ono A. Relationships between plasma membrane microdomains and HIV-1 assembly. Biol Cell. 2010;102:335–350. doi: 10.1042/BC20090165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Pelchen-Matthews A, et al. beta2 integrin adhesion complexes maintain the integrity of HIV-1 assembly compartments in primary macrophages. Traffic. 2012;13:273–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01306.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mlcochova P, et al. Organization and regulation of intracellular plasma membrane-connected HIV-1 assembly compartments in macrophages. BMC Biol. 2013;11:89. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-11-89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Weng J, et al. Formation of syncytia is repressed by tetraspanins in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-producing cells. J Virol. 2009;83:7467–7474. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00163-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Krementsov DN, et al. Tetraspanins regulate cell-to-cell transmission of HIV-1. Retrovirology. 2009;6:64. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-6-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Roy NH, et al. Clustering and mobility of HIV-1 Env at viral assembly sites predict its propensity to induce cell-cell fusion. J Virol. 2013;87:7516–7525. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00790-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hogue IB, et al. Gag induces the coalescence of clustered lipid rafts and tetraspanin-enriched microdomains at HIV-1 assembly sites on the plasma membrane. J Virol. 2011;85:9749–9766. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00743-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Krementsov DN, et al. HIV-1 assembly differentially alters dynamics and partitioning of tetraspanins and raft components. Traffic. 2010;11:1401–1414. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01111.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Chukkapalli V, et al. Interaction between the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag matrix domain and phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate is essential for efficient gag membrane binding. J Virol. 2008;82:2405–2417. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01614-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Chukkapalli V, Ono A. Molecular determinants that regulate plasma membrane association of HIV-1 Gag. J Mol Biol. 2011;410:512–524. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Monde K, et al. Assembly and replication of HIV-1 in T cells with low levels of phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate. J Virol. 2011;85:3584–3595. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02266-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chukkapalli V, et al. Evidence in support of RNA-mediated inhibition of phosphatidylserine-dependent HIV-1 Gag membrane binding in cells. J Virol. 2013;87:7155–7159. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00075-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gladnikoff M, et al. Retroviral assembly and budding occur through an actin-driven mechanism. Biophys J. 2009;97:2419–2428. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Cooper J, et al. Filamin A protein interacts with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag protein and contributes to productive particle assembly. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:28498–28510. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.239053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ehrlich LS, et al. Sprouty2 regulates PI(4,5)P2/Ca2+ signaling and HIV-1 Gag release. J Mol Biol. 2011;410:716–725. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.04.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ehrlich LS, et al. ESCRT machinery potentiates HIV-1 utilization of the PI(4,5)P(2)-PLC-IP3R-Ca(2+) signaling cascade. J Mol Biol. 2011;413:347–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Zhong P, et al. Cell-to-cell transmission of viruses. Curr Opin Virol. 2013;3:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2012.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Chen P, et al. Predominant mode of human immunodeficiency virus transfer between T cells is mediated by sustained Env-dependent neutralization-resistant virological synapses. J Virol. 2007;81:12582–12595. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00381-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Jolly C, et al. HIV-1 cell to cell transfer across an Env-induced, actin-dependent synapse. J Exp Med. 2004;199:283–293. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Jolly C, et al. Adhesion molecule interactions facilitate human immunodeficiency virus type 1-induced virological synapse formation between T cells. J Virol. 2007;81:13916–13921. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01585-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Llewellyn GN, et al. Nucleocapsid promotes localization of HIV-1 gag to uropods that participate in virological synapses between T cells. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001167. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Wong R, et al. Phospholipase C and myosin light chain kinase inhibition define a common step in actin regulation during cytokinesis. BMC Cell Biol. 2007;8:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-8-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hartwig JH, et al. Thrombin receptor ligation and activated Rac uncap actin filament barbed ends through phosphoinositide synthesis in permeabilized human platelets. Cell. 1995;82:643–653. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90036-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sul D, et al. Smooth muscle length-dependent PI(4,5)P2 synthesis and paxillin tyrosine phosphorylation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;281:C300–310. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2001.281.1.C300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]