Skip to main content
Anesthesia, Essays and Researches logoLink to Anesthesia, Essays and Researches
. 2013 Sep-Dec;7(3):312–318. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.123216

Advances in neuro-monitoring

Charu Mahajan 1, Girija Prasad Rath 1,, Parmod Kumar Bithal 1
PMCID: PMC4173560  PMID: 25885975

Abstract

Neuromonitoring aims to detect harmful physiologic events, early enough to guide the treatment instituted. Evidences encourage us to implement multimodal monitoring, as no single monitor is capable of providing a complete picture of dynamic cerebral state. This review highlights the role of intracranial pressure monitoring, cerebral oxygenation (jugular venous oximetry, brain tissue oxygenation, near infrared oximetry, cerebral microdialysis) and cerebral blood flow monitoring (direct and indirect methods) in the management of neurologically injured patients. In this context, the recent developments of these monitors along with the relevant clinical implications have been discussed. Nevertheless, the diverse range of data obtained from these monitors needs to be integrated and simplified for the clinician. Hence, the future research should focus on identification of a most useful monitor for integration into multimodal system.

Keywords: Neuro-monitoring neurological injury, neuroanesthesia, neurocritical care

INTRODUCTION

Neuro-monitoring assumes paramount significance because the condition of neurologically impaired patients may change rapidly within a short period of time impacting the outcome. The main concern in these patients is to maintain cerebral perfusion and hence, meeting with the metabolic demands of brain for oxygen and glucose. This holds good for patients with acute neurological conditions such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), stroke etc., Hence, the goal of monitoring should include detection of harmful physiologic events before they cause irreversible damage to brain and providing on-line feedback to guide treatment instituted. As the secondary injuries are either systemic or intracranial in nature, the monitoring modalities must include detection of both these components. The systemic and routine neurointensive monitoring variables include electrocardiography, arterial oxygen tension (SpO2), arterial blood pressure, temperature, arterial blood gases and electrolytes. However, this article aims to review the recent developments of intracranial monitoring modalities with relevant clinical implications.

INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE MONITORING

Measurement of ICP is essential to determine cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Normal ICP in supine position is 5-15 mmHg in adults, 3-7 mmHg in children and 1.5-6 mmHg in infants.[1] The treatment threshold for raised ICP is considered as 15-20 mmHg.[1] Management of raised ICP is an integral part of neurointensive care practice. For this there has been a continuous effort for developing an ideal method for measuring ICP. The development of strain gauges and an external transducer revolutionized the ICP monitoring technique and has been widely adopted. The Richmond and Leeds screw once widely used, has now declined in popularity. The intraventricular technique remains the gold standard for ICP measurement. This invasive method measures the global ICP with additional advantages of periodic external calibration, therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and instillation of drugs or antibiotics directly into the ventricle. However, the placement of catheter may be difficult in cases of severe brain swelling and also runs the risk of infection.[2] Currently, catheter-tipped transducers are widely used. These microtransducer-tipped ICP sensors can be placed in brain parenchyma, intraventricular or subdural space through a burr-hole or during a neurosurgical procedure. They are almost as accurate as ventricular catheters. Fiberoptic (Camino ICP Monitor), Strain gauge (Codman Microsensor, Neurovent-P ICP Monitor), or pneumatic (Spiegelberg ICP Monitor) technologies are used to transduce pressure in these modern devices. However, most of these devices do not allow in vivo pressure calibration (exception Spiegelberg monitor). After a pre-insertion calibration (zeroed with atmospheric pressure), their output is subject to the zero drift of the sensor though the drift is as low as 0.6 ± 0.9 mmHg during in vivo testing. The ICP monitoring allows measurement of absolute ICP value, calculation of CPP, identification and analysis of pathological waveforms (Lundberg A wave or Plateau waves), calculation of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity and pressure-volume compensatory reserve.[1]

Noninvasive methods of measuring ICP do not involve risk of hemorrhage or infection. Various methods such as transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography,[3,4] tympanic membrane displacement,[5,6] optic nerve sheath diameter,[7,8] and transcranial color-coded duplex sonography.[9] Noninvasive techniques lack the accuracy of their invasive counterparts thus they cannot be used as an alternative to the invasive techniques.[10]

Despite lack of class I evidence supporting its efficacy in TBI, there are large number of scientific publications which supports this monitoring not only for guiding therapeutic interventions but also for early detection of mass lesions and prediction of prognosis.[1] However, in patients with severe TBI, Chesnut et al. observed that the care focused on maintaining monitored ICP at 20 mmHg or less was not superior to the care based on imaging and clinical examination.[11]

CEREBRAL OXYGENATION MONITORING

Jugular venous oximetry[12]

Cannulation of the jugular bulb allows assessment of the global oxygenation status of the brain and adequacy of cerebral blood flow (CBF). The dominant jugular vein is cannulated and the catheter tip is placed at the level of body of first cervical vertebra, medial to mastoid process which can be confirmed by lateral X-ray of skull.[13] This intends to minimize contamination from extracerebral venous drainage (about 3%). Normal jugular venous oxygenation (SjvO2) ranges is between 55% and 75%.[13] The ischemic threshold has been reported to be a SjvO2 < 50% for at least 10 min[14] which is associated with poor outcome following TBI. Low SjvO2 indicates either an increase in oxygen demand (fever, seizures) or a reduction in oxygen delivery due to vasospasm or hypotension, or inadequate CPP. A high SjvO2 indicates hyperemia, or decreased metabolic demand of the brain. SjvO2 monitoring has been used commonly in patients with TBI for detection of reduced cerebral perfusion and by some to titrate hyperventilation in patients with increased ICP. Brain trauma foundation guidelines recommend maintenance of SjvO2 greater than 50%.

A significant association exists between arterio-jugular difference of oxygen content and poor neurological outcome.[15] However, it has low sensitivity to regional changes, and studies using positron emission tomography (PET) scan indicate that a relatively large volume of tissue must be affected (approximately 13%), before SjvO2 levels decrease below 50%.[16] Intraoperative jugular venous oximetry has been used intraoperatively during pediatric intracranial neurosurgery to optimize cerebral physiology.[17]

Brain tissue oxygen monitoring (PbO2)

PbO2 monitoring probe (diameter 0.8 mm) is a miniature Clark electrode inserted into the brain parenchyma and measures brain tissue PO2 in vivo. It represents the balance between oxygen delivery and consumption. The two most commonly used systems to date are the Licox and the Neurotrend. The Licox system provides PbO2 with or without brain temperature, in an estimated 7.1-15 mm2 area. In addition to PbO2, Neurotrend provides information on brain tissue partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PbCO2), pH and temperature. Currently, only Licox system is available commercially to monitor PbO2. Post insertion computed tomographic (CT) scan confirms probe position in the brain parenchyma. The inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) is increased transiently and a corresponding increase PbO2 is ensured to exclude the presence of surrounding micro-hemorrhages or sensor damage at the point of insertion. A ‘run in’ or equilibration time of up to 1 h is required before readings are considered stable. The normal values are in the range of 35-50 mmHg.[18] Generally PbO2 < PaO2 (extravascular sensor placement and high metabolic activity), PbCO2 (40-70 mmHg) > PaCO2 (high metabolism), pH brain (7.05-7.25) < pH blood (high brain metabolism).[13] A PbO2 value less than 10 mmHg (Licox) should be corrected within 30 min to prevent poor outcome.[19] Placement near the injury or penumbra will yield values reflecting the local measure of brain tissue oxygen to guide therapy, whereas placement within a contusion or clot will give erroneous readings. Ponce et al. studied retrospectively, 405 severe TBI patients in whom PbO2 probe was placed either in normal or abnormal brain. They noted that PbO2 and outcome were related only when probe was placed in abnormal brain.[20]

PbO2 monitoring is useful in various clinical situations where cerebral ischemia is a risk. Correctly positioned PbO2 monitoring allows not only assessment of the effect and reversibility of temporary aneurysm clipping, but can also be indicative of the correct positioning of the subsequent permanent clip.[21] Jödicke et al. found that PbO2 monitoring during aneurysm clipping supplemented somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) monitoring in identifying ischemia, especially in those patients where the baseline SEP was absent. Using a threshold of 15 mmHg, PbO2 was found more effective than SSEP monitoring for predicting ischemia.[22] Low intraoperative PbO2 values indicate high risk of occurrence of postoperative TCD detected vasospasm in cases of aneurysmal SAH.[23]

In patients with TBI, PbO2 has been shown to be a good indicator of treatment effects and correlates well with clinical outcome measures.[24] ICP/CPP and Pbto2-based therapy is associated with better outcome after severe TBI than ICP/CPP – based therapy alone.[25] However, it further needs to be proved by a randomized controlled trial.[26] The change in trend of PbO2 values is helpful in detecting secondary insult and guiding specific therapy. However, the disadvantages of this monitor are: It gives a local measure of PbO2 and is invasive.

Regional and global oxygenation monitoring techniques are not competitive or mutually exclusive. Neither Jugular venous oxygen saturation nor PbO2 monitoring alone identifies all episodes of ischemia and they should be considered complementary with monitoring strategies taking advantage of the unique features of each technique.

Near-infrared spectroscopy

NIRS is a noninvasive method of estimating cerebral oxygenation.[12,27] It is based on reflectance oximetry and measures the light reflected from chromophobes in the brain (hemoglobin) to derive the regional oxygen saturation (rSO2). It interrogates arterial, venous and capillary blood and hence, the oxygen saturation represents an average value for these compartments. However, most of the NIRS signal is from the venous blood which contributes to approximately 70% of intracranial blood volume. This technique indirectly measures changes in CBF and cerebral blood volume (CBV) by detecting changes in venous saturation.[26] Two types of NIRS instruments commonly available for clinical use: The INVOS series (Somanetics Corporation USA) and the NIRO series (Hamamatsu Photonics Japan). The former presents a single numerical value for regional cerebral oxygen saturation whereas the latter provides tissue oxygen index in percentage terms and changes in oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin variables and oxidized cytochrome-c oxidase.

The sensors illuminate up to a volume of 10 ml of hemispherical tissue. The radial depth will depend on the interoptode distance. The optodes are placed on one side of the forehead with an interoptode spacing of 4-7 cm. Near infrared time resolved spectroscopy with functional maximal optode spacing of 4 cm measure cerebral hemodynamic responses optimally and quantitatively.[28] Taussky et al. demonstrates that CT perfusion CBF has a significant linear correlation with NIRS measurement.[29] The normal values of rSO2 is reported to be 60-80% and the ischaemic threshold is estimated to be 47% saturation.[30] This critical cerebral oxygen saturation was observed by comparing cerebral oxygen saturation with EEG during controlled episodes of venticular fibrillation in humans. The investigators found EEG evidence of cerebral ischemia in 47% of patients under anesthesia.

Despite problems of extracranial contamination, limitation for placement on the forehead, and interference by ambient light, NIRS has several applications. Bhatia et al. studied 32 SAH patients during coil embolization and found that angiographic cerebral vasospasm was strongly associated with decrease in trend of ipsilateral NIRS values.[31] In patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, cerebral co-oximeter helps in detecting cerebral ischemia.[32] A relative decrease in rSO2 of 16-20% during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) predicted neurological compromise.[33] Mille et al. identified a cutoff point of 12% decrease in rSO2 as optimal for defining ischemia secondary to internal carotid artery clamping during CEA.[34] Increase in rSO2 value immediately after declamping of the internal carotid artery (cutoff point, 5%) is useful for detection post-CEA hyperperfusion syndrome with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86.4%[35] In addition, it has been used to detect a low cardiac output state and utilized for noninvasive cerebral autoregulation assessment. A new technology employing ultrasound guided NIRS holds promise for non-invasive and real-time bedside CBF monitoring.[36] It has found utility even in monitoring CBF autoregulation.[37]

Cerebral microdialysis

CMD is one of the promising bed-side neuro-monitors which provide analysis of biochemical markers for occurrence of hypoxia/ischemia. It helps in identifying impending secondary injury and thus early implementation of neuroprotective strategies. Hence, its use has been recommended in severe cases of TBI.[38] CMD measures metabolic products locally in the area of the catheter, hence it should be placed in ‘at-risk’ tissue following TBI, in area around a mass lesion or in the nondominant frontal lobe following diffuse axonal injury. Energy metabolites (glucose, lactate, pyruvate), the lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR), toxic neurotransmitters (glutamate, aspartate), tissue damage indices (glycerol, potassium) are the most commonly measured biochemical variables. The normal values of glucose 1.7-2.1 mmol/l, Lactate 2.9-3.1 mmol/l, pyruvate 151-166 μmol/l, LPR 19-23, glycerol is 50-100 μmol/l, and glutamate 14-16 μmol/l.[39,40] The trend is however more useful than absolute measures.

Online continuous dialysate analysis can detect changes 9 min after they have occurred as compared to 30 min required for probe-to-detection time using an offline analyzer.[41] However, intraoperative CMD monitoring still has a long way to go.[42]

Intracranial hypertension results in reduced brain pyruvate and elevated LPR. When autoregulation is deranged, the increase in LPR with CPP reduction is even more pronounced.[43] A high LPR correlates with severity of clinical symptoms and poor outcome after severe head injury. A rise in glycerol levels, indicating progression to cell damage has been found after severe head injury.[43] Schlenk et al. found that cerebral glucose increases when blood level is > 140 mg/dl. Glucose level above 7.8 mmol/l (140 mg/dl) were independent predictors of unfavorable outcome and mortality in SAH patients.[44]

CBF MONITORING

CBF monitoring offers a rational approach to detect and prevent secondary insults and improve the outcome of these patients. Normal value of CBF in young adults is 50 ml/100 g of brain tissue/min (range 20-70 ml). The ischemic threshold for CBF is 18 ml/100 g/min and below 10 ml/100 g/min, irreversible damage ensues.[45]

The CBF monitors may be discussed in two broad categories: Direct CBF measurements and Indirect CBF measurements.

Direct CBF monitoring

These methods are invasive, more quantitative and often require transport of the patients from the ICU.

PET

PET (positron emission tomography) provides quantitative in vivo measurement of CBF, cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2), CBV, oxygen extraction fraction, and is considered the gold standard for studying cerebral hemodynamics.[46] Isotopes commonly used are 11C, 13N, 15O and require on-site production. Several limitation of this technique are use of radioactive compounds, requires shifting of the patient to a radiology facility, needs cyclotron, is expensive, not universally available, and gives a single shot assessment.

Perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) detects irreversibly infarcted tissue whereas perfusion weighted MRI (PWI) also identifies potential ischemic areas.[46] It can assess vascular patency if magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is added. It requires either an exogenous gadolinium contrast agent or an endogenous diffusible tracer No ionizing radiation is used. Values of rCBF measured by MRI and PET methods correlate well.[47] PWI is time consuming and more expensive than CT scan.

Xenon-enhanced computed tomography

In xenon-enhanced computed tomography (XeCT) the non-radioactive Xe is inhaled for 4-5 min which is radiodense on subsequent CT scan.[46] It is based on the Kety algorithm to quantitatively measure regional and global CBF. The ability of Xe (33%) itself to modify CBF is minimal.[48] However, it requires transfer of the patients, measurement times are long, provide non-continuous measure of CBF and are available in few centers only.

Single-photon emission computed tomography

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the 3-D image produced by gamma scintillation counting.[46] It utilizes 133Xe or 99mTc as the radioisotopes for CBF estimation. Other lipophilic tracers used are SPECTamine and Ceretac. By comparing an ischemic area with presumably normal area, relative CBF can be measured with this technique. Though cheaper than PET, it also requires transfer of the patients, has limited spatial resolution and provides single-shot measure of CBF.

Computed tomography perfusion scan

In computed tomography perfusion (CTP) scan, the concentration of the contrast agent used is proportional to the perfusion parameters.[46] After iodinated contrast is infused, concurrent images are acquired using a helical CT multislice scanner and thus CBF, CBV, mean transit time, time-to-peak can be calculated. Along with absolute values of CBF, it helps in detecting preservation of autoregulation. It also provides only regional CBF values.[49]

Indirect (bedside) CBF monitoring

Thermal diffusion flowmetry

Thermal conductivity of cerebral cortical tissues varies directly with CBF. Probe consists of a thermistor which is heated and a sensor which measures temperature. The temperature difference between the two reflects local CBF.[50] As cerebral temperature increases, the temperature difference decreases. In patients with severe TBI, it has been used for assessment of autoregulation and vasoreactivity.[51] It provides continuous, quantitative assessment of cortical perfusion. Its main limitations are potential complications of acute tissue damage, bleeding, and infection and erroneous readings due to external thermal factors.

Laser doppler flowmetry

A craniotomy or burr hole is needed to insert a laser Doppler flowmeter to detect cortical blood flow.[50] The depth and area of the tissue involved limit the technique. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) provides continuous and real-time measurements of regional CBF changes are relatively inexpensive and non-radioactive. It has been used to assess autoregulation, CO2 reactivity and to detect ischemic injury.

TCD ultrasonography

Transcranial doppler (TCD) is a non-invasive, bed-side technique, which uses pulsed-doppler ultrasound beam of 2 MHz frequency to measure relative changes in CBF in the basal cerebral arteries provided angle of insonation and the diameter of the insonated vessel remain constant.[12,52,53] Reasonable correlations have been reported between TCD and Xe CT and PET CBF measurements.[54] It has also found utility for detecting cerebral vasospasm after SAH, for evaluation of autoregulation, for noninvasive estimation of ICP and to confirm brain death.

The pulsatility index (PI), also called Gosling index, reflects the cerebrovascular resistance, mainly ICP. It is derived from following formula:

graphic file with name AER-7-312-g001.jpg

Where FV dias is diastolic blood flow velocity and FV sys is systolic blood flow velocity

Higher the value of PI more is the resistance. Normal PI is independent of angle of insonation and ranges between 0.6 and 1.0. PI is inversely proportional to CPP. Hence, PI provides the best TCD correlate of CPP and ICP.

Schmidt and associates[55] assessed noninvasive CPP (nCPP) from the following formula with satisfactory accuracy (error < 10 mmHg in more than 80% cases).

nCPP = (Mean arterial pressure × Diastolic flow velocity)/Mean flow velocity + 14

The drawbacks of TCD are measurement of relative flow velocity, operator dependent, and failure to insonate the temporal window in 5-10% of cases.

Others

An ultrasonic perivascular flow probe has recently been developed for direct intraoperative CBF measurement.[56] CBF can also be estimated from NIRS assessment of indocyanine green clearance.[57]

CONCLUSION

Most of the monitoring modalities described above have drawbacks when considered in isolation. Invasive techniques provide continuous information on a particular area of brain with associated risk of complications whereas noninvasive techniques provide non-continuous information of multiple sites. Therefore, the challenge is to integrate all these modalities (Multimodal monitoring) in order to combine their strengths and allow greater confidence in the decision making for patient management. Modern multimodality monitoring systems provide the clinicians with diverse range of data. Interpretation of these data is complex and may require computer assisted methods. The future research should focus on identification of most useful monitor for integration into multimodal system.

Footnotes

Source of Support: Nil

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Smith M. Monitoring intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:240–8. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000297296.52006.8e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lozier AP, Sciacca RR, Romagnoli MF, Connolly ES., Jr Ventriculostomy-related infections: A critical review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:170–81. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200207000-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bellner J, Romner B, Reinstrup P, Kristiansson KA, Ryding E, Brandt L. Transcranial Doppler sonography pulsatility index (PI) reflects intracranial pressure (ICP) Surg Neurol. 2004;62:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2003.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Voulgaris SG, Partheni M, Kaliora H, Haftouras N, Pessach IS, Polyzoidis KS. Early cerebral monitoring using the transcranial Doppler pulsatility index in patients with severe brain trauma. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11:CR49–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lang EW, Paulat K, Witte C, Zolondz J, Mehdorn HM. Noninvasive intracranial compliance monitoring. Technical note and clinical results. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:214–8. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.1.0214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shimbles S, Dodd C, Banister K, Mendelow AD, Chambers IR. Clinical comparison of tympanic membrane displacement with invasive intracranial pressure measurements. Physiol Meas. 2005;26:1085–92. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/6/017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rajajee V, Vanaman M, Fletcher JJ, Jacobs TL. Optic nerve ultrasound for the detection of raised intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15:506–15. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9606-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Soldatos T, Chatzimichail K, Papathanasiou M, Gouliamos A. Optic nerve sonography: A new window for the non-invasive evaluation of intracranial pressure in brain injury. Emerg Med J. 2009;26:630–4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.058453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brandi G, Béchir M, Sailer S, Haberthür C, Stocker R, Stover JF. Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography allows to assess cerebral perfusion pressure noninvasively following severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:965–72. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0643-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Raboel PH, Bartek J, Jr, Andresen M, Bellander BM, Romner B. Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods-A Review. Crit Care Res Pract 2012. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/950393. 950393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W, et al. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2471–81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Timofeev I, Gupta A. Monitoring of head injured patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005;18:477–83. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000183107.19673.ed. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ercole A, Gupta AK. Cerebral oxygenation. In: Matta BF, Menon DK, Smith M, editors. Core Topics in Neuroanaesthesia and Neurointensive Care. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011. pp. 72–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Robertson CS, Gopinath SP, Goodman JC, Contant CF, Valadka AB, Narayan RK. SjvO2 monitoring in head-injured patients. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12:891–6. doi: 10.1089/neu.1995.12.891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stocchetti N, Canavesi K, Magnoni S, Valeriani V, Conte V, Rossi S, et al. Arterio-jugular difference of oxygen content and outcome after head injury. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:230–4. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130393.08355.D4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Coles JP, Fryer TD, Smielewski P, Chatfield DA, Steiner LA, Johnston AJ, et al. Incidence and mechanisms of cerebral ischemia in early clinical head injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24:202–11. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000103022.98348.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sharma D, Siriussawakul A, Dooney N, Hecker JG, Vavilala MS. Clinical experience with intraoperative jugular venous oximetry during pediatric intracranial neurosurgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013;23:84–90. doi: 10.1111/pan.12031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hoffman WE, Charbel FT, Edelman G. Brain tissue oxygen, carbon dioxide, and pH in neurosurgical patients at risk for ischemia. Anesth Analg. 1996;82:582–6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maloney-Wilensky E, Gracias V, Itkin A, Hoffman K, Bloom S, Yang W, et al. Brain tissue oxygen and outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2057–63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a009f8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ponce LL, Pillai S, Cruz J, Li X, Julia H, Gopinath S, et al. Position of probe determines prognostic information of brain tissue PO2 in severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery. 2012;70:1492–502. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31824ce933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cerejo A, Silva PA, Dias C, Vaz R. Monitoring of brain oxygenation in surgery of ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:70. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.81732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jödicke A, Hübner F, Böker DK. Monitoring of brain tissue oxygenation during aneurysm surgery: Prediction of procedure-related ischemic events. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:515–23. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.3.0515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cerejo A, Silva PA, Vilarinho A, Dias C, Vaz R. Intraoperative brain oxygenation monitoring and vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Res. 2012;34:181–6. doi: 10.1179/1743132811Y.0000000064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Spiotta AM, Stiefel MF, Gracias VH, Garuffe AM, Kofke WA, Maloney-Wilensky E, et al. Brain tissue oxygen-directed management and outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2010;113:571–80. doi: 10.3171/2010.1.JNS09506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Narotam PK, Morrison JF, Nathoo N. Brain tissue oxygen monitoring in traumatic brain injury and major trauma: Outcome analysis of a brain tissue oxygen-directed therapy. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:672–82. doi: 10.3171/2009.4.JNS081150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nangunoori R, Maloney-Wilensky E, Stiefel M, Park S, Andrew Kofke W, Levine JM, et al. Brain tissue oxygen-based therapy and outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic literature review. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:131–8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9621-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Minhas PS, Kirkpatrick PJ. Multimodal monitoring in neurointensive care. In: Matta BF, Menon DK, Turner JM, editors. Textbook of Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care. London: Greenwich Medical Media Ltd; 2000. pp. 159–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ohmae E, Ouchi Y, Oda M, Suzuki T, Nobesawa S, Kanno T, et al. Cerebral hemodynamics evaluation by near-infrared time-resolved spectroscopy: Correlation with simultaneous positron emission tomography measurements. Neuroimage. 2006;29:697–705. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Taussky P, O’Neal B, Daugherty WP, Luke S, Thorpe D, Pooley RA, et al. Validation of frontal near-infrared spectroscopy as noninvasive bedside monitoring for regional cerebral blood flow in brain-injured patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;32:E2. doi: 10.3171/2011.12.FOCUS11280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Levy WJ, Levin S, Chance B. Near-infrared measurement of cerebral oxygenation. Correlation with electroencephalographic ischemia during ventricular fibrillation. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:738–46. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199510000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bhatia R, Hampton T, Malde S, Kandala NB, Muammar M, Deasy N, et al. The application of near-infrared oximetry to cerebral monitoring during aneurysm embolization: A comparison with intraprocedural angiography. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2007;19:97–104. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e318031376d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yamamoto K, Miyata T, Nagawa H. Good correlation between cerebral oxygenation measured using near infrared spectroscopy and stump pressure during carotid clamping. Int Angiol. 2007;26:262–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hirofumi O, Otone E, Hiroshi I, Satosi I, Shigeo I, Yasuhiro N, et al. The effectiveness of regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring using near-infrared spectroscopy in carotid endarterectomy. J Clin Neurosci. 2003;10:79–83. doi: 10.1016/s0967-5868(02)00268-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mille T, Tachimiri ME, Klersy C, Ticozzelli G, Bellinzona G, Blangetti I, et al. Near infrared spectroscopy monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: Which threshold value is critical? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:646–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ogasawara K, Konno H, Yukawa H, Endo H, Inoue T, Ogawa A. Transcranial regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring during carotid endarterectomy as a predictor of postoperative hyperperfusion. Neurosurgery. 2003;53:309–14. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000073547.86747.f3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schytz HW, Guo S, Jensen LT, Kamar M, Nini A, Gress DR, et al. A new technology for detecting cerebral blood flow: A comparative study of ultrasound tagged NIRS and 133Xe-SPECT. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:139–45. doi: 10.1007/s12028-012-9720-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Brady K, Joshi B, Zweifel C, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Easley RB, et al. Real-time continuous monitoring of cerebral blood flow autoregulation using near-infrared spectroscopy in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Stroke. 2010;41:1951–6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.575159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Timofeev I, Hutchinson P. Microdialysis. In: Gupta AK, Gelb AW, editors. Essentials of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurointensive Care. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsivier; 2008. pp. 277–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Reinstrup P, Ståhl N, Mellergård P, Uski T, Ungerstedt U, Nordström CH. Intracerebral microdialysis in clinical practice: Baseline values for chemical markers during wakefulness, anesthesia, and neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2000;47:701–9. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200009000-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schulz MK, Wang LP, Tange M, Bjerre P. Cerebral microdialysis monitoring: Determination of normal and ischemic cerebral metabolisms in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:808–14. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.5.0808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bhatia R, Hashemi P, Razzaq A, Parkin MC, Hopwood SE, Boutelle MG, et al. Application of rapid-sampling, online microdialysis to the monitoring of brain metabolism during aneurysm surgery. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:ONS–313. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000208963.42378.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Helmy A, Hutchinson P. Is cerebral microdialysis a clinical tool? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013;155:355–6. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1588-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Timofeev I, Czosnyka M, Carpenter KL, Nortje J, Kirkpatrick PJ, Al-Rawi PG, et al. Interaction between brain chemistry and physiology after traumatic brain injury: Impact of autoregulation and microdialysis catheter location. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28:849–60. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schlenk F, Vajkoczy P, Sarrafzadeh A. Inpatient hyperglycemia following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Relation to cerebral metabolism and outcome. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11:56–63. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9222-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Veenith T, Menon DK. The cerebral circulation. In: Matta BF, Menon DK, Smith M, editors. Core Topics in Neuroanaesthesia and Neurointensive Care. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011. pp. 17–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Coles JP. Imaging after brain injury. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:49–60. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Feng CM, Narayana S, Lancaster JL, Jerabek PA, Arnow TL, Zhu F, et al. CBF changes during brain activation: fMRI versus PET. Neuro Image. 2004;22:443–6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Durby JM, Nemoto EM, Yonas H, Melick J. Stable xenon does not increase intracranial pressure in primates with freeze-injury-induced intracranial hypertension. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11:522–6. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wintermark M, Chioléro R, van Melle G, Revelly JP, Porchet F, Regli L, et al. Relationship between brain perfusion computed tomography variables and cerebral perfusion pressure in severe head trauma patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1579–87. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000130171.08842.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lee SC, Chen JF, Lee ST. Continuous regional cerebral blood flow monitoring in the neurosurgical intensive care unit. J Clin Neurosci. 2005;12:520–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2004.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rosenthal G, Sanchez-Mejia RO, Phan N, Hemphill JC, 3rd, Martin C, Manley GT. Incorporating a parenchymal thermal diffusion cerebral blood flow probe in bedside assessment of cerebral autoregulation and vasoreactivity in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:62–70. doi: 10.3171/2010.6.JNS091360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Walsh S, Matta BF. Bedside measurements of cerebral blood flow. In: Matta BF, Menon DK, Turner JM, editors. Textbook of Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care. London: Greenwich Medical Media Ltd; 2000. pp. 89–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rubin M, Yu W, Agostini MA, Madden CJ, Diaz-Arrastia RR. Noninvasive monitoring. In: Jallo J, Loftus CM, editors. Neurotrauma and Critical Care of the Brain. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc; 2009. pp. 53–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Steiner LA, Coles JP, Johnston AJ, Chatfield DA, Smielewski P, Fryer TD, et al. Assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation in head-injured patients: A validation study. Stroke. 2003;34:2404–9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000089014.59668.04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Schmidt EA, Czosnyka M, Gooskens I, Piechnik SK, Matta BF, Whitfield PC, et al. Preliminary experience of the estimation of cerebral perfusion pressure using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70:198–204. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.2.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Amin-Hanjani S, Meglio G, Gatto R, Bauer A, Charbel FT. The utility of intraoperative blood flow measurement during aneurysm surgery using an ultrasonic perivascular flow probe. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:1346–53. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000333799.44338.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Terborg C, Bramer S, Harscher S, Simon M, Witte OW. Bedside assessment of cerebral perfusion reductions in patients with acute ischaemic stroke by near-infrared spectroscopy and indocyanine green. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:38–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anesthesia, Essays and Researches are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES