Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1995 Jun 6;92(12):5664–5668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5664

Yeast histone H3 and H4 N termini function through different GAL1 regulatory elements to repress and activate transcription.

J S Wan 1, R K Mann 1, M Grunstein 1
PMCID: PMC41757  PMID: 7777566

Abstract

Previous work has shown that N-terminal deletions of yeast histone H3 cause a 2- to 4-fold increase in the induction of GAL1 and a number of other genes involved in galactose metabolism. In contrast, deletions at the H4 N terminus cause a 10- to 20-fold decrease in the induction of these same GAL genes. However, H3 and H4 N-terminal deletions each decrease PHO5 induction only 2- to 4-fold. To define the GAL1 gene regulatory elements through which the histone N termini activate or repress transcription, fusions were made between GAL1 and PHO5 promoter elements attached to a beta-galactosidase reporter gene. We show here that GAL1 hyperactivation caused by the H3 N-terminal deletion delta 4-15 is linked to the upstream activation sequence. Conversely, the relative decrease in GAL1 induction caused by the H4N-terminal deletion delta 4-28 is linked to the downstream promoter which contains the TATA element. These data indicate that the H3 N terminus is required for the repression of the GAL1 upstream element, whereas the H4N terminus is required for the activation of the GAL1 downstream promoter element.

Full text

PDF
5664

Images in this article

5666Fig. 2
on p.5666
5666Fig. 3
on p.5666

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buratowski S., Hahn S., Guarente L., Sharp P. A. Five intermediate complexes in transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II. Cell. 1989 Feb 24;56(4):549–561. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90578-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Durrin L. K., Mann R. K., Grunstein M. Nucleosome loss activates CUP1 and HIS3 promoters to fully induced levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1621–1629. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Durrin L. K., Mann R. K., Kayne P. S., Grunstein M. Yeast histone H4 N-terminal sequence is required for promoter activation in vivo. Cell. 1991 Jun 14;65(6):1023–1031. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90554-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fascher K. D., Schmitz J., Hörz W. Role of trans-activating proteins in the generation of active chromatin at the PHO5 promoter in S. cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1990 Aug;9(8):2523–2528. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07432.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Finley R. L., Jr, Chen S., Ma J., Byrne P., West R. W., Jr Opposing regulatory functions of positive and negative elements in UASG control transcription of the yeast GAL genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5663–5670. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Finley R. L., Jr, West R. W., Jr Differential repression of GAL4 and adjacent transcription activators by operators in the yeast GAL upstream activating sequence. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Oct;9(10):4282–4290. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.10.4282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fisher-Adams G., Grunstein M. Yeast histone H4 and H3 N-termini have different effects on the chromatin structure of the GAL1 promoter. EMBO J. 1995 Apr 3;14(7):1468–1477. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07133.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Flick J. S., Johnston M. Two systems of glucose repression of the GAL1 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;10(9):4757–4769. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.9.4757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Giniger E., Varnum S. M., Ptashne M. Specific DNA binding of GAL4, a positive regulatory protein of yeast. Cell. 1985 Apr;40(4):767–774. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90336-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guarente L., Yocum R. R., Gifford P. A GAL10-CYC1 hybrid yeast promoter identifies the GAL4 regulatory region as an upstream site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Dec;79(23):7410–7414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.23.7410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hadfield C., Cashmore A. M., Meacock P. A. An efficient chloramphenicol-resistance marker for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli. Gene. 1986;45(2):149–158. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90249-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Han M., Grunstein M. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell. 1988 Dec 23;55(6):1137–1145. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90258-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johnston M. A model fungal gene regulatory mechanism: the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1987 Dec;51(4):458–476. doi: 10.1128/mr.51.4.458-476.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lamphier M. S., Ptashne M. Multiple mechanisms mediate glucose repression of the yeast GAL1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 1;89(13):5922–5926. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mann R. K., Grunstein M. Histone H3 N-terminal mutations allow hyperactivation of the yeast GAL1 gene in vivo. EMBO J. 1992 Sep;11(9):3297–3306. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05408.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nehlin J. O., Carlberg M., Ronne H. Control of yeast GAL genes by MIG1 repressor: a transcriptional cascade in the glucose response. EMBO J. 1991 Nov;10(11):3373–3377. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04901.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Roth S. Y., Shimizu M., Johnson L., Grunstein M., Simpson R. T. Stable nucleosome positioning and complete repression by the yeast alpha 2 repressor are disrupted by amino-terminal mutations in histone H4. Genes Dev. 1992 Mar;6(3):411–425. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.3.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rudolph H., Hinnen A. The yeast PHO5 promoter: phosphate-control elements and sequences mediating mRNA start-site selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Mar;84(5):1340–1344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.5.1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schmid A., Fascher K. D., Hörz W. Nucleosome disruption at the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction occurs in the absence of DNA replication. Cell. 1992 Nov 27;71(5):853–864. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90560-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Struhl K. Duality of TBP, the universal transcription factor. Science. 1994 Feb 25;263(5150):1103–1104. doi: 10.1126/science.8108728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Thompson J. S., Ling X., Grunstein M. Histone H3 amino terminus is required for telomeric and silent mating locus repression in yeast. Nature. 1994 May 19;369(6477):245–247. doi: 10.1038/369245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Torchia T. E., Hamilton R. W., Cano C. L., Hopper J. E. Disruption of regulatory gene GAL80 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects on carbon-controlled regulation of the galactose/melibiose pathway genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Aug;4(8):1521–1527. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.8.1521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vogel K., Hörz W., Hinnen A. The two positively acting regulatory proteins PHO2 and PHO4 physically interact with PHO5 upstream activation regions. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 May;9(5):2050–2057. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.5.2050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Webster N., Jin J. R., Green S., Hollis M., Chambon P. The yeast UASG is a transcriptional enhancer in human HeLa cells in the presence of the GAL4 trans-activator. Cell. 1988 Jan 29;52(2):169–178. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90505-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. West R. W., Jr, Yocum R. R., Ptashne M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL1-GAL10 divergent promoter region: location and function of the upstream activating sequence UASG. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Nov;4(11):2467–2478. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.11.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wobbe C. R., Struhl K. Yeast and human TATA-binding proteins have nearly identical DNA sequence requirements for transcription in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Aug;10(8):3859–3867. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.8.3859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Xu H. E., Johnston S. A. Yeast bleomycin hydrolase is a DNA-binding cysteine protease. Identification, purification, biochemical characterization. J Biol Chem. 1994 Aug 19;269(33):21177–21183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yocum R. R., Hanley S., West R., Jr, Ptashne M. Use of lacZ fusions to delimit regulatory elements of the inducible divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Oct;4(10):1985–1998. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.10.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES