Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2014 Aug 1;289(38):26167–26177. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.601153

Regulation of Yersinia Protein Kinase A (YpkA) Kinase Activity by Multisite Autophosphorylation and Identification of an N-terminal Substrate-binding Domain in YpkA*

Khavong Pha , Matthew E Wright , Tasha M Barr , Richard A Eigenheer §, Lorena Navarro ‡,1
PMCID: PMC4176208  PMID: 25086045

Background: The catalytic mechanism of the Yersinia protein kinase YpkA is poorly understood.

Results: Multiple N-terminal autophosphorylation sites regulate YpkA activation and residues 40–49 of YpkA contribute to Gαq binding and phosphorylation.

Conclusion: The N-terminal domain of YpkA plays a role in autophosphorylation and substrate binding.

Significance: Elucidating how type III bacterial effectors are regulated is essential to our understanding of infectious diseases.

Keywords: Bacterial Pathogenesis, Heterotrimeric G Protein, Host-Pathogen Interaction, Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase, Type III Secretion System (T3SS), Gαq, Yersinia Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase A, YpkA, Autophosphorylation, Substrate-binding Domain

Abstract

The serine/threonine protein kinase YpkA is an essential virulence factor produced by pathogenic Yersinia species. YpkA is delivered into host mammalian cells via a type III secretion system and localizes to the inner side of the plasma membrane. We have previously shown that YpkA binds to and phosphorylates the α subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein complex, Gαq, resulting in inhibition of Gαq signaling. To identify residues in YpkA involved in substrate binding activity we generated GFP-YpkA N-terminal deletion mutants and performed coimmunoprecipitation experiments. We located a substrate-binding domain on amino acids 40–49 of YpkA, which lies within the previously identified membrane localization domain on YpkA. Deletion of amino acids 40–49 on YpkA interfered with substrate binding, substrate phosphorylation and substrate inhibition. Autophosphorylation regulates the kinase activity of YpkA. To dissect the mechanism by which YpkA transmits signals, we performed nano liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry to map in vivo phosphorylation sites. Multiple serine phosphorylation sites were identified in the secretion/translocation region, kinase domain, and C-terminal region of YpkA. Using site-directed mutagenesis we generated multiple YpkA constructs harboring specific serine to alanine point mutations. Our results demonstrate that multiple autophosphorylation sites within the N terminus regulate YpkA kinase activation, whereas mutation of serine to alanine within the C terminus of YpkA had no effect on kinase activity. YpkA autophosphorylation on multiple sites may be a strategy used by pathogenic Yersinia to prevent inactivation of this important virulence protein by host proteins.

Introduction

Three Yersinia species (Yersinia pestis, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, and Yersinia enterocolitica) are highly pathogenic for humans. All three harbor an extrachromosomal 70 kb plasmid that encodes a type III secretion system (T3SS)2 and a variety of bacterial virulence factors. The T3SS is a sophisticated translocation apparatus highly conserved among many Gram-negative bacteria that is used to deliver bacterially encoded proteins directly into the host cytosol (1). Yersinia uses the T3SS to deliver a set of effector proteins termed Yops (Yersinia outer proteins) into infected eukaryotic cells: YopH, a protein tyrosine phosphatase; YpkA (referred to as YopO in Y. enterocolitica), a protein kinase; YopT, a cysteine protease; YopJ (referred to as YopP in Y. enterocolitica), an acetyltransferase; YopE, a GTPase-activating protein; and YopM, a leucine-rich protein that down-regulates expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (212). Once inside the host cell, the concerted activities of the Yop effectors function to prevent phagocytosis, superoxide production, and cytokine synthesis by professional phagocytes and other types of host cells by directly interacting with host proteins and inhibiting signaling pathways (1319).

YpkA is a serine/threonine protein kinase that phosphorylates actin and the small heterotrimeric G protein subunit Gαq (2021). The C terminus of YpkA interacts with members of the Rho family of small GTPases, RhoA and Rac1 (2223). The deubiquitinating enzyme otubain 1 (OTUB1) was initially identified as a substrate for YpkA; however more recent studies have linked otubain 1 to the RhoGDI domain of YpkA (2425). The 729-amino acid YpkA protein is composed of multiple domains (Fig. 1). Residues 1–77 (Sec/Trans) mediate type III secretion and translocation of YpkA into a target cell (26). This region coincides with a chaperone-binding domain (CBD), amino acids 20–77 (27). Once inside the cell, a membrane localization domain (MLD) consisting of amino acids 20–90 localizes YpkA to the inner side of the plasma membrane where it is in close proximity to signaling proteins involved in transducing external signals inside the cell (2728). Residues 150–400 comprise the N-terminal serine/threonine kinase domain. Substitution of a conserved aspartic acid (Asp-267) and a lysine (Lys-269) residue with alanine results in a catalytically inactive kinase (21). Y. pseudotuberculosis mutant strains expressing catalytically inactive YpkA variants are markedly attenuated in virulence in mouse infection studies (19). In cell culture infection assays, the enzymatic activity of YpkA was necessary for inhibition of host cell bacterial internalization (2931). A region within the C-terminal domain (residues 431–612, RhoGDI) of YpkA possesses Rho GTPase binding guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI)-like activity and has been shown to be important for inactivation of the small Rho GTPases, RhoA and Rac1 (32). The GDI-like activity interferes with phagocytosis by disrupting the host actin cytoskeleton (33). Substitution of three amino acids (Y591A, N595A, E599A) in the GDI-like domain interferes with Rho GTPase binding (32). The last 21 amino acids (residues 709–729) are involved in actin binding and subsequent autoactivation of YpkA kinase activity (21). Residues serine 90 and serine 95 were reported as autophosphorylation sites required for efficient activation and phosphorylation of exogenous substrates by YpkA (30).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Schematic illustration of wild-type YpkA.

Both kinase and guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor domains of YpkA are important in the activity of full length YpkA (19, 3132). The kinase activity of YpkA is dependent on its association with actin (21, 30). Although YpkA has been shown to phosphorylate actin and otubain 1 in vitro, the physiological importance of these findings is unclear (21, 24, 25). We previously reported that YpkA interacts with and phosphorylates the heterotrimeric G protein Gαq, although the involvement of additional components remains to be determined (20). YpkA-mediated phosphorylation of Ser-47 on Gαq impairs guanine nucleotide binding and subsequently inhibits Gαq-mediated signaling pathways (20). Gαq belongs to the family of heterotrimeric G proteins that couple with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to transduce signals from a myriad of extracellular agents and play a central regulatory role in a number of cellular activities (3435). G proteins are divided into four families based on sequence similarities of the α subunits: Gαs, Gαi/o, Gα12/13, and Gαq. Members of the Gαs and Gαi families are known to activate and inhibit adenylyl cyclase, respectively. Members of the Gα12/13 family regulate the small G protein RhoA, while Gαq family members stimulate phospholipase C-β (PLC-β), leading to the hydrolysis of phophatidyl-4,5-bisphosphate and the production of inositol triphosphate (IP3) and diaccylglycerol (DAG). In addition, Gαq family members have also been shown to activate RhoA-mediated pathways. The importance of heterotrimeric G protein α subunits in eukaryotic defense responses is underscored by the observation that a number of bacterial pathogens have evolved toxins that specifically target their activity (36).

We have previously shown that the N-terminal 430 amino acids of YpkA are essential for substrate binding (20). As a first step toward elucidating the mechanism of substrate recognition mediated by the YpkA N-terminal domain, we have identified residues 40–49 that are critical for YpkA-mediated inhibition of Gαq signaling. The efficiency of substrate-binding and -phosphorylation by YpkA is diminished by deletion of residues 40–49 of YpkA, suggesting that they are important for substrate recognition. Trasak et al. proposed a model in which actin binding induces autophosphorylation of YpkA on serine 90 and serine 95 (30). Using an in vivo labeling assay we demonstrated that a YpkA S90A/S95A mutant undergoes autophosphorylation and demonstrates substrate phosphorylation activity, indicating the presence of additional autophosphorylation sites. Here, we report that multiple autophosphorylation sites within the N terminus of YpkA regulate its kinase activity. These findings further our understanding of the molecular mechanism used by Yersinia type III effectors to circumvent host defenses.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cell Culture, Transfection, and Reagents

Human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293A) were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.1 mm non-essential amino acids, and 2 mm l-glutamine. Cells were cultured in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The TransIT-LT1 Transfection Reagent (Mirus) or the FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was used according to the manufacturer's recommendations. All reagents were from Fisher Scientific, Sigma-Aldrich, Invitrogen, or New England Biolabs unless otherwise noted. All oligonucleotide primers were from Integrated DNA Technologies.

Construction of Plasmids

The Y. enterocolitica YpkA ORF (YopO) was isolated by PCR using the plasmid pYV80811 (a generous gift from James Bliska, The State University of New York at Stony Brook). Full-length YpkA and its various mutants were cloned in-frame into the pEGFP-C3 (Clontech), FLAG-tagged pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen), or GST-tagged pGEX-6P-2 vectors following standard protocols. YpkA internal deletion mutants were generated using the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Clontech) following the manufacturer's instructions. All point mutations were introduced by using the QuikChange II Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent) following the manufacturer's recommendations. All expression constructs were verified by sequencing.

Recombinant Protein Expression

Expression of YpkA with GST was induced in subcultures of Escherichia coli BL21 (RIPL) using 0.4 mm isopropyl-1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside (IPTG). After overnight incubation at room temperature, bacteria were pelleted and resuspended in GST lysis buffer (30 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 2 mm dithiothreitol), 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and Halt Protease inhibitor mixture (Thermo Scientific). Bacterial cells were lysed using an Avestin EmulsiFlex-C3 homogenizer. The crude lysate was incubated with 0.2% Triton X-100 prior to pelleting the bacterial debris. The GST-tagged protein was affinity-purified on glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Bead-bound proteins were pelleted, washed with GST lysis buffer, and eluted with 200 mm reduced glutathione (in GST lysis buffer, pH 7.4).

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting

After transfection for 16–20 h, cells were lysed in modified RIPA buffer (50 mm Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mm NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 10 mm sodium fluoride, and 0.4 mm EDTA) containing protease inhibitors (Halt Protease Inhibitor Mixture; Thermo Scientific) and 1 mm PMSF. The homogenate was centrifuged (14,000 × g, 4 °C, 20 min), and the supernatants were incubated with anti-FLAG M2 agarose beads (Sigma) or with the indicated antibodies bound to protein G beads overnight at 4 °C with gentle rotation. After incubation, immunoprecipitates were washed extensively with ice-cold modified RIPA buffer. Proteins bound to the beads were eluted by heating at 70 °C for 10 min in LDS-PAGE sample loading buffer. The eluted proteins were separated by SDS/PAGE, transferred to a PVDF membrane, and probed with the specified antibodies followed by chemiluminescence detection. Whole cell lysates were separated by SDS/PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting as described above. The following antibodies were used: anti-actin (2033) (Sigma), anti-GFP (JL-8) (Clontech), anti-FLAG-M2 (Sigma), and anti-Gαq (E-17) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Generation of Gαq Phosphospecific Antibodies

Polyclonal affinity purified phosphospecific peptide antibodies were generated by 21st Century Biochemicals (Marlboro, MA). The Gαq peptides used were: TGESGK[pS]TFIKQMC and CGTGESGK[pS]TFIKQM. To selectively purify antibodies with phosphospecificity from the anti-sera, a two-stage affinity purification was taken. First, each anti-serum was negatively purified by exposure to an affinity column containing the nonphosphorylated peptide. Second, the flow-through from the negative purification was positively purified on a column containing the phosphorylated peptide.

Immunofluorescence

Semiconfluent HEK293A monolayers were grown overnight on 22-mm-diameter glass coverslips in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Monolayers were transfected with plasmid DNA as described above. For all carbachol (Calbiochem) experiments, HEK293A cells were also transfected with HA-M1 muscarinic receptor (M1R) cDNA expression plasmid to make these cells responsive to carbachol since they do not express endogenous M1Rs. Where indicated cells were stimulated with 200 μm carbachol for 60 min. For indirect immunofluorescence, samples were fixed, permeabilized, and stained as previously described (21). Proteins were visualized by direct fluorescence of GFP- or mCherry-containing proteins, or, where indicated, with anti-FLAG M2-Cy3 (Sigma), and the appropriate secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen). Nuclear staining was achieved by staining with Hoescht stain (Invitrogen). Rhodamine-phalloidin (Invitrogen) was used to stain the actin cytoskeleton. Images were acquired by epi-fluorescence microscopy with the ×60 apochromat objective lens using a Nikon Eclipse 80i fluorescence microscope. For subcellular localization of the YpkA variants an Olympus FV1000 laser scanning confocal microscope was used to image the cells.

In Vivo Labeling with [32P]Orthophosphate

Labeling experiments were performed as described previously (20). For all labeling experiments HEK293A cells were cultured and transfected as described above. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were washed with phosphate-free DMEM. Following a 2-h incubation with the same medium containing [32P]orthophosphate (150 μCi/ml), the cells were lysed with TNN lysis buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 2 mm EDTA, and 50 mm NaF) supplemented with Halt Protease Inhibitor Mixture (Thermo Scientific) and 1 mm PMSF. Whole-cell lysates were harvested and split equally. One-half was incubated with anti-FLAG agarose beads. The remaining lysate was used in an immunoprecipitation with a polyclonal antiserum bound to protein A-Sepharose that recognizes Gαq. Bead-bound proteins were washed with lysis buffer, heated in LDS sample buffer at 70 °C for 10 min, and separated by SDS-PAGE. Protein phosphorylation was visualized by autoradiography. For plasmid expression, an immunoblot was performed as described above on whole-cell lysates. Densitometry was performed using the ImageJ analysis software (NIH) as per the developer's recommendations.

Phosphorylation Site Identification by Nano Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

In vivo phosphorylation of FLAG-YpkA was performed as described above in the absence of [γ-32P]ATP. After purification by affinity chromatography, SDS-PAGE, and Coomassie blue staining, bands corresponding to YpkA were excised from the gel. YpkA was prepared for MS analysis using methods adapted from standard reduction, alkylation, and tryptic digestion procedures (37). Peptides were dried down in a vacuum concentrator after digestion, then resolubilized in 2% acetonitrile/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid for LC-MS/MS analysis. Digested peptides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS on an LTQ-FT with Michrom Paradigm LC and CTC Pal autosampler. Peptides were directly loaded onto a Agilent ZORBAX 300SB C18 reversed phase trap cartridge, which, after loading, was switched in-line with a Michrom C18 column connected to the Thermo-Finnigan LTQ-FT mass spectrometer through a Michrom Advance Plug and Play nano-spray source. The nano-LC column (Michrom 3μ 200Å MAGIC C18AQ 200μ × 150 mm) was used with a 90-min gradient (2–10% buffer B in 5 min, 10–35% buffer B in 65 min, 35–70% buffer B in 5 min, hold at 70% buffer B for 1 min, then down to 2% buffer B in 1 min, holding at 2% buffer B for 13 min) at a flow rate of 2 μl min−1 for the maximum separation of tryptic peptides. MS and MS/MS spectra were acquired using a top 4 method and an MS survey scan was obtained for the m/z range 400–1300. An isolation mass window of 2 Da was for the precursor ion selection, and a normalized collision energy of 35% was used for the fragmentation. Tandem mass spectra were extracted by Xcalibur version 2.0.7. Charge state deconvolution and deisotoping were not performed. All MS/MS samples were analyzed using X! Tandem (The GPM, thegpm.org; version CYCLONE (2013.02.01.1)). X! Tandem was set up to search a Yersinia database (9010 entries) assuming the digestion enzyme trypsin. X! Tandem was searched with a fragment ion mass tolerance of 0.40 Da and a parent ion tolerance of 20 PPM. Carbamidomethyl of cysteine was specified in X! Tandem as a fixed modification. Glu->pyro-Glu of the n-terminus, ammonia-loss of the n-terminus, deamidation of asparagine and glutamine, oxidation of methionine and tryptophan, acetyl of the N-terminus and phosphorylation of serine, threonine, and tyrosine were specified in X!Tandem as variable modifications. Scaffold (version Scaffold_4.0.1, Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR) was used to validate MS/MS based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they met or exceeded 95% probability in Scaffold. Protein identifications were accepted if they were greater than or equal to 95% probability determined in Scaffold, and they contained at least 2 identified peptides. Proteins that contained similar peptides and could not be differentiated based on MS/MS analysis alone were grouped to satisfy the principles of parsimony. Proteins sharing significant peptide evidence were grouped into clusters. Two LC-MS/MS runs on the LTQ-FT were used to create the list of possible phosphorylation sites.

In Vitro Kinase Assays

Kinase reactions were performed with ∼2 μg of the indicated recombinant GST-YpkA protein in 30 μl of kinase buffer containing 20 mm Hepes, pH 7.4, 10 mm MgC2H3O2, and 1 mm DTT supplemented with 0.5 mm ATP, 2 μCi [γ-32P]ATP and incubated with 1 μg of actin (Sigma). The reaction was incubated at 30 °C on the thermomixer for 30 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 4× LDS sample buffer and heating for 10 min at 70 °C. A third of the reaction was separated by SDS/PAGE gel and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. Phosphorylated proteins were visualized by autoradiography. One-third of the reaction was separated by SDS/PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue. Densitometry was performed using the ImageJ analysis software (NIH) as described above.

RESULTS

Identification of a Novel Substrate-binding Domain at the N Terminus of YpkA

We previously demonstrated that the YpkA N-terminal residues 1–430 mediate interaction with Gαq (20). To further define the substrate-binding domain we generated GFP-tagged N-terminal YpkA truncations and performed immunoprecipitation assays. As previously shown both full-length YpkA and a YpkA variant containing the kinase domain (amino acids 1–430) interacted with Gαq, whereas a C-terminal YpkA variant containing the GDI-like domain (amino acids 399–729) was unable to interact with Gαq (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, whereas the N-terminal deletion mutant YpkA40–729 associated with Gαq (Fig. 2A, lane 5), further deletion at the N terminus of YpkA resulted in loss of binding to Gαq (Fig. 2A, lanes 6–8). Thus, amino acids 40–88 of YpkA are required for efficient binding of Gαq, since deletion of the first 88 amino acids prevented Gαq binding. To further define the region responsible for substrate binding we created additional N-terminal YpkA deletion mutants (Fig. 2B). As compared with the efficient substrate binding by YpkA40–729 (Fig. 2B, lane 5), removal of an additional ten amino acids (YpkA50–729) was sufficient to disrupt Gαq binding (Fig. 2B, lanes 6–10). Controls in this experiment included full-length YpkA and YpkA1–430 that bound to Gαq (Fig. 2B, lanes 2–3), as opposed to YpkA399–729 that did not (Fig. 2B, lane 4). N-terminal YpkA peptides fused to GFP did not associate with Gαq suggesting that additional residues play a role in substrate binding (Fig. 2C, lanes 5–7).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

The N terminus of YpkA reveals a novel substrate-binding site. A, residues 40–88 of YpkA harbor a substrate-binding site. HEK293A cells were cotransfected with GFP-YpkA constructs and GαqQ209L. Anti-GFP immunoprecipitations (IP) were probed by anti-Gαq or GFP immunoblot (IB) to show input levels. B, amino acids 40–49 of YpkA are essential for substrate binding. The GFP-tagged YpkA deletion constructs were coexpressed with GαqQ209L in HEK293A cells. The binding of truncated versions of YpkA to GαqQ209L and the immunoprecipitated YpkA mutants, as well as the level of protein expression in whole cell lysates, were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-GFP and anti-Gαq antibodies. C, residues 1–150 of YpkA are not sufficient for Gαq binding. HEK293A cells overexpressing GαqQ209L alone or with one of the indicated GFP-tagged constructs were lysed, and immunoprecipitation was performed using the anti-GFP antibody. Immunoblots were carried out using anti-GFP and anti-Gαq antibodies. (*denotes IgG heavy chain; Gαq, 42 kDa; YpkA, 108. 3 kDa; YpkA1–430, 74.4 kDa; YpkA399–729, 64.4 kDa; YpkA40–729, 104 kDa; YpkA50–729, 102.6 kDa; YpkA60–729, 101.5 kDa; YpkA70–729, 100 kDa; YpkA80–729, 99.3 kDa; YpkA89–729, 98.4 kDa; YpkA100–729, 97 kDa; YpkA151–729, 92 kDa; YpkA1–60, 34 kDa; YpkA1–100, 38 kDa; YpkA1–150, 44 kDa).

Amino acids 40–50 of YpkA Are Required for Efficient Inhibition of Gαq Signaling

YpkA binds and phosphorylates the heterotrimeric G protein Gαq interfering with GTP binding and activation (20). We examined the effect of the YpkA N-terminal deletion mutants on Gαq signaling using a tubby nuclear translocation assay to monitor activation of Gαq (20). The transcription factor tubby is involved in maturity-onset obesity in mice and is known to be a downstream target of Gαq (38). Tubby localizes to the plasma membrane by binding phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. Receptor-mediated activation of Gαq is thought to release tubby from the plasma membrane through the activity of phospholipase C-β, triggering translocation of tubby to the nucleus (38). HEK293A cells were transfected with a mCherry-tagged tubby plasmid and either GFP, GFP-YpkA, GFP-YpkAD267A or a GFP-YpkA N-terminal deletion mutant. After overnight transfection, HEK293A cells were stimulated with carbachol for 60 min. Then cells were washed, fixed, permeabilized, and visualized via immunofluorescence. Expression of GFP in control cells did not interfere with Gαq-mediated nuclear localization of tubby (Fig. 3A, panel A). As previously shown, expression of YpkA interfered with the nuclear translocation of tubby after carbachol stimulation (Fig. 3A, panel B), whereas the catalytically inactive YpkA mutant, YpkAD267A, did not prevent localization of tubby to the nucleus confirming that the kinase activity of YpkA is required for inhibition of Gαq signaling (Fig. 3A, panel C). Although YpkA1–430 binds Gαq, it does not interfere with its activation (Fig. 3A, panel D). The GDI-like domain was not sufficient to prevent the nuclear localization of tubby (Fig. 3A, panel E). Importantly, YpkA40–729 interacts with Gαq and inhibits its activation (Fig. 3A, panel F). However, YpkA50–729 did not inhibit Gαq mediated nuclear translocation of tubby, nor did further N-terminal deletion mutants (Fig. 3A, panels G–M). Therefore, residues 40–50 of YpkA appear critical for inhibition of Gαq.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

The substrate-binding domain (SBD) of YpkA is required for efficient inhibition of Gαq signaling. A, immunofluorescence microscopy of carbachol-stimulated HEK293A cells transfected with GFP, GFP-YpkA, or the indicated GFP-YpkA variants and mCherry-tubby. After overnight transfection cells were stimulated with 200 μm carbachol for 60 min, washed, fixed, and visualized using an immunofluorescence microscope. Merged image of GFP-YpkA (green) and mCherry-tubby (red) is shown in the right panel. B, YpkA100–729 undergoes autophosphorylation in vitro. Indicated GST-YpkA constructs were incubated with [γ-32P]ATP and subjected to an in vitro kinase reaction, followed by SDS-PAGE, and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Upper panel, autoradiography; lower panel, Coomassie Blue staining.

Since autophosphorylation is a requirement for YpkA kinase activation and subsequent inhibition of Gαq signaling, we confirmed the ability of these N-terminal YpkA mutants to autophosphorylate in an in vitro kinase assay (Fig. 3B) (30). Bacterially expressed GST-YpkA proteins were generated and subjected to an in vitro kinase assay. Autophosphorylation was observed in wild-type YpkA and YpkA100–729. In contrast, autophosphorylation was not observed with either the kinase inactive mutant, YpkAD267A, or the N-terminal deletion mutant YpkA151–729, suggesting that amino acids 100–150 are required for autophosphorylation, since deletion of amino acids 1–99 did not affect YpkA kinase activity. Thus, the inability of YpkA50–729 to interfere with Gαq signaling is likely due to reduced substrate binding rather than improper folding of the protein (Fig. 3B).

We next examined the effect of deleting amino acids 40–50 of YpkA on Gαq binding and phosphorylation. Immunoprecipitates prepared from HEK293A cells transfected with vector, FLAG-YpkA, FLAG-YpkAΔ40–50, or FLAG-YpkA1–430 were analyzed by SDS/PAGE and immunoblotting. YpkA and YpkA1–430 associated with Gαq, whereas YpkAΔ40–50 had minimal binding to Gαq (Fig. 4A). To detect phosphorylation of Gαq by YpkA we used an antibody generated against phospho-Gαq (Ser-47). Phosphorylated Gαq was detected in lysates of YpkA-transfected HEK293A cells. However, phosphorylation of Gαq was significantly reduced in cell lysates expressing YpkAΔ40–50 (Fig. 4B). We further tested the effect of YpkAΔ40–50 on the nuclear translocation of tubby upon carbachol stimulation (Fig. 4C). Tubby nuclear translocation was seen in control cells as well as in cells expressing the catalytically deficient mutant, YpkAD267A. Wild-type YpkA interfered with tubby nuclear localization, whereas, YpkAΔ40–50 lost ability to inhibit Gαq mediated translocation of tubby to the nucleus, suggesting that amino acids 40–50 on YpkA enhance the efficiency of substrate phosphorylation.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Amino acids 40–50 of YpkA are required for efficient substrate-binding and -phosphorylation. A, YpkAΔ40–50 has reduced Gαq binding activity. HEK293A cells were transiently transfected with GαqQ209L and either vector, FLAG-YpkA, FLAG-YpkAΔ40–50, or FLAG-YpkA1–430. Cells were lysed and incubated with FLAG-agarose beads. Bead eluates and lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting for Gαq and FLAG. B, YpkAΔ40–50 demonstrates reduced Gαq phosphorylation compared with wild-type YpkA. HEK293A cells were co-transfected with Gαq and either vector, YpkA, YpkAD267A, or YpkAΔ40–50. All YpkA constructs were fused to an N-terminal FLAG epitope tag. Whole cell lysates were probed using anti-phosphoGαq and Gαq antibodies. C, YpkAΔ40–50 does not interfere with Gαq signaling in vivo. HEK293A cells were transiently transfected with GFP-tubby and either vector or FLAG-tagged versions of YpkA (wild type, YpkAD267A, YpkAΔ40–50, or YpkAΔ20–90). After 24 h, cells were stimulated with 200 μm carbachol for 60 min. Cells were then stained with an anti-FLAG M2-Cy3 antibody to detect YpkA localization (left panel). Tubby localization was determined by GFP expression (middle panel). The right panel shows a merged image of FLAG-YpkA (red), GFP-tubby (green), and Hoescht staining (blue) to detect nuclear localization. Representative examples are shown.

The Substrate-binding Domain Resides within the Membrane Localization Domain of YpkA

Upon translocation into a target cell by the Yersinia T3SS, YpkA localizes to the inner side of the plasma membrane (28). Previous studies reported that the MLD of YpkA resides within amino acids 20–90. Since the substrate-binding domain lies within this region we examined the effect of a YpkAΔ20–90 internal deletion on Gαq binding, phosphorylation and signaling. As shown in Fig. 5A, YpkAΔ20–90 was deficient in Gαq binding and phosphorylation. Additionally, YpkAΔ20–90 did not interfere with Gαq-mediated nuclear translocation of tubby (Fig. 4C). To determine if deletion of amino acids 40 through 50 interfered with membrane localization we transfected HEK293A cells with vector, FLAG-YpkA, FLAG-YpkA1–430, FLAG YpkAΔ40–50, and FLAG-YpkAΔ20–90 and performed immunofluorescence microscopy. After overnight transfection, cells were fixed, washed and permeablized. YpkA was detected by FLAG-Cy3 visualization using a confocal microscope. YpkA, YpkA1–430, and YpkAΔ40–50 localized to the plasma membrane, however YpkAΔ20–90 did not, and was detected in the cytoplasm (Fig. 5B). Thus, in addition to a secretion/translocation and membrane localization domain, the N terminus of YpkA also contains a substrate-binding domain comprising of amino acids 40–49 that are essential for efficient substrate binding and phosphorylation.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

The substrate-binding domain of YpkA is not required for membrane localization. A, MLD of YpkA is required for substrate binding and phosphorylation. HEK293A cells were co-transfected with GαqQ209L and either vector, YpkA, YpkAD267A, or YpkAΔ20–90. Anti-FLAG immunoprecipitations (IP) were probed by anti-Gαq or anti-FLAG immunoblot (IB) to show input levels. Cell lysates were probed using anti-phosphoGαq and Gαq antibodies. B, YpkAΔ40–50 localizes to the plasma membrane. HEK293A cells were transiently transfected with FLAG-tagged versions of YpkA or vector alone. After 24 h, cells were stained with an anti-FLAG M2-Cy3 antibody to detect YpkA localization using a confocal microscope. Nuclear localization was detected by staining with Hoescht dye.

YpkA S90A/S95A Autophosphorylation Mutant Possesses Kinase Activity in Vivo

YpkA is found in a catalytically inactive conformation when produced in Yersinia (21). Full activation of YpkA kinase activity in vitro requires actin binding and autophosphorylation. Trasak et al. proposed a model in which actin binding induces autophosphorylation of YpkA on serine 90 and serine 95 (30). A YpkAS90A/S95A mutant was reduced in autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of exogenous substrates in an in vitro kinase assay (30). To assess whether autophosphorylation on serine 90 and serine 95 were required for phosphorylation of Gαq we examined the affect of a YpkAS90A/S95A mutant on Gαq activation. HEK293A cells were transfected with GFP-tubby and either vector, YpkA, YpkAD267A, or YpkAS90A/S95A and a tubby nuclear translocation assay was performed. After overnight transfection, the cells were stimulated with carbachol for 60 min and processed for immunofluorescence microscopy. Tubby nuclear localization was evident in cells expressing vector and YpkAD267A only (Fig. 6A). Wild-type YpkA and YpkAS90A/S95A inhibited the nuclear translocation of tubby after carbachol stimulation (Fig. 6A).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

YpkAS90A/S95A autophosphorylation mutant inhibits Gαq signaling in vivo. A, YpkAS90A/S95A autophosphorylation mutant interferes with Gαq signaling. Immunofluorescence microscopy of HEK293A cells transfected with the indicated constructs. Cells were treated with 200 μm of carbachol for 60 min. Image of GFP-tubby (green) in the left panel and merged image of GFP-tubby (green), Hoescht staining (blue) to detect nuclear staining and rhodamine phalloidin to detect actin (red). B, YpkAS90A/S95A autophosphorylation mutant demonstrates autophosphorylation and Gαq phosphorylation activity in vivo. HEK293A cells cotransfected with GαqQ209L and FLAG-YpkA plasmids were metabolically labeled with [32P]H3PO4. Following solubilization of the cells, FLAG-YpkA and Gαq were precipitated with an anti-FLAG and anti-Gαq antibody, respectively. Shown is an autoradiogram of SDS-PAGE for YpkA (first panel) and Gαq (third panel). Anti-FLAG (second panel) and anti-Gαq (fourth panel) immunoprecipitations (IP) were probed by anti-FLAG and anti-Gαq (IB), respectively. The numbers indicate relative intensities of 32P radiation whereby the value of YpkA (control) was arbitrarily set to 1.

To confirm that YpkAS90A/S95A underwent autophosphorylation we performed metabolic labeling experiments to assess YpkA autophosphorylation and Gαq phosphorylation by YpkA in vivo. HEK293A cells were transiently transfected with GαqQ209L in the presence of either vector, wild-type YpkA, YpkAD267A, or YpkAS90A/S95A. Following a 2-h incubation with [32P]orthophosphate, YpkA and Gαq were immunoprecipitated from cell lysates with anti-FLAG and anti-Gαq antibodies, respectively. Phosphorylated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by autoradiography. As shown in Fig. 6B, incorporation of [32P]orthophosphate into the YpkA protein was observed in wild-type YpkA and YpkAS90A/S95A, but not in vector controls or upon exposure of equal amounts of the inactive kinase-deficient YpkAD267A. Additionally, Gαq was phosphorylated by all YpkA variants except in vector controls and YpkAD267A lysates. Thus, autophosphorylation on serine 90 and serine 95 on YpkA are not critical for Gαq phosphorylation. Taken together, these results allude to the presence of additional autophosphorylation sites on YpkA and underscore the complexity of this Yersinia effector.

Mapping Autophosphorylation Sites in YpkA

To identify additional autophosphorylation sites in vivo we used a mass spectrometric approach. FLAG-YpkA was isolated from transiently transfected HEK293A cells by binding to anti-FLAG agarose beads. Following gel electrophoresis, immunoprecipitated FLAG-YpkA was extracted from the gel followed by nano liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. We identified nineteen autophosphorylation sites, two of which were previously reported (Fig. 7A) (30). These residues were located in the secretion/translocation region, kinase domain, and RhoGDI domain of YpkA. We initially generated a full-length YpkA mutant containing serine to alanine point mutations in all nineteen residues, YpkASA (Fig. 7A). FLAG-YpkA, FLAG-YpkAD267A and FLAG-YpkASA were immunoprecipitated from transiently transfected 293A human embryonic kidney cells and autophosphorylated in vitro in a kinase buffer containing [γ-32P]ATP. Wild-type YpkA underwent autophosphorylation, whereas, YpkAD267A and YpkASA were deficient in their ability to incorporate radioactivity (Fig. 7B). We next determined whether YpkASA was affected in its ability to phosphorylate Gαq by performing a Western blot using a phospho-Gαq antibody. Gαq phosphorylation was significantly reduced in HEK293A lysates expressing YpkASA compared with lysates expressing YpkA (Fig. 7C, second panel). Lack of Gαq phosphorylation was not due to its inability to bind to Gαq as shown in Fig. 7C (first panel). These results imply that YpkASA may harbor critical residues required for YpkA autophosphorylation. We next generated four additional YpkA serine to alanine mutants: YpkASA1–150 contains S52A, S55A, S90A, S95A, S102A, S144A, and S147A; YpkASA1–400 contains S52A, S55A, S90A, S95A, S102A, S144A, S147A, S164A, S303A, S317A, S320A, S327A, S353A, and S389A; YpkASA150–400 contains S164A, S303, S317A, S320A, S327A, S353A and S389A; YpkASA436–710 contains S496A, S520A, S529A, S534A, and S620A. FLAG-tagged proteins were expressed in HEK293A cells and immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to an in vitro kinase assay and followed by SDS-PAGE. The level of autophosphorylation was similar for YpkA and YpkASA436–710 suggesting that the indicated point mutations within the RhoGDI domain did not affect YpkA autophosphorylation (Fig. 7D). As we previously observed, YpkASA had minimal levels of autophosphorylation. The YpkASA1–400 mutant spanning the secretion/translocation and kinase domains was significantly impaired in its autophosphorylation activity. The levels of autophosphorylation in the YpkASA1–150 and YpkASA150–400 variants were .52 and .26, respectively, relative to wild type YpkA. We examined the affect of the YpkA variants on Gαq signaling in a cellular environment by assessing their ability to interfere with the nuclear translocation of GFP-tubby upon carbachol stimulation. Empty vector control cells displayed nuclear localization of tubby after stimulation with carbachol (Fig. 7E). YpkA expressing cells inhibited the nuclear accumulation of tubby in the nucleus, whereas cells expressing the catalytically inactive YpkAD267A mutant showed tubby nuclear localization. The lack of YpkASA and YpkASA1–400 to inhibit the nuclear translocation of tubby shows a direct correlation with the level of autophosphorylation activity. In the presence of YpkASA1–150, YpkASA150–400 and YpkASA436–710, tubby did not accumulate in the nucleus. Altogether, our results suggest that multisite autophosphorylation is an important determinant in the regulation of YpkA kinase activity.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

Multiple N-terminal autophosphorylation sites stimulate YpkA kinase activity. A, summary of the mass spectrometry results. FLAG-YpkA was immunoprecipitated from transfected HEK293A cells with anti-FLAG agarose beads. After purification by affinity chromatography, SDS-PAGE, and Coomassie Blue staining, bands corresponding to YpkA were excised from the gel and subjected to nano liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry as described in “Experimental Procedures.” Nineteen potential autophosphorylation sites were identified, including two previously reported (Ser-90 and Ser-95) (30). The YpkA serine to alanine (YpkASA) mutants were generated using overlap extension PCR. B, autophosphorylation of wild type and mutant YpkA proteins. Immunoprecipitated FLAG-YpkA constructs were subjected to an in vitro kinase assay, run on SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membrane. Shown are an autoradiogaph (upper panel) and an immunoblot probed with an anti-FLAG antibody (lower panel). C, YpkASA is deficient in Gαq phosphorylation. FLAG-tagged YpkA proteins and Gαq were expressed in HEK293A cells, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with antibodies anti-Gαq (first panel) and anti-FLAG (fourth panel). Whole cell lysates were probed with phospho-Gαq (second panel) and Gαq (third panel) antibodies. (*, nonspecific band). D, autophosphorylation of YpkA constructs harboring the indicated serine to alanine point mutations. HEK293A cells were transfected with YpkA or the indicated YpkA variants. Cells were lysed, and anti-FLAG immunoprecipitates were subjected to an in vitro kinase assay. Samples were analyzed by autoradiography (upper panel) and anti-FLAG immunoblotting (lower panel). The numbers indicate levels of autophosphorylation of the YpkA constructs relative to YpkA (control). E, N-terminal serine residues are required for in vivo YpkA activity. Merged image of HEK293A cells transfected with GFP-tubby (green) and vector or indicated YpkA variants. Hoescht staining (blue) was used to detect nuclear staining, and rhodamine phalloidin was used to detect actin (red).

DISCUSSION

Identification of a Novel Substrate-binding Site at the N Terminus of YpkA

Virulence in Y. pseudotuberculosis depends upon the translocated virulence factor YpkA, a protein that disrupts the actin cytoskeleton and inhibits phagocytosis (13). Despite the known importance to virulence, little information has been forthcoming to elucidate the mechanism of activity of YpkA. This has been particularly true of the N-terminal domain of the protein, which, while known to have serine/threonine kinase activity, has remained enigmatic in terms of function. In addition to a kinase domain, the N-terminal domain of YpkA also contains a membrane localization domain, amino acids 20–90, and a chaperone-binding domain, amino acids 20–77 (2728). In this study, we have determined by deletion experiments that a region between residues 40–49 of YpkA is critical for efficient substrate-binding and phosphorylation, and inhibition of Gαq signaling. The low levels of Gαq observed in Fig. 2B, lanes 6–10, suggest that, although, amino acids 40–49 on YpkA enhance the efficiency of substrate binding additional residues may also contribute to substrate binding. Our results using YpkA peptides indicate that the substrate-binding domain is likely “discontinuous” and is dependent on the secondary and tertiary structure of YpkA. Thus, the N terminus of YpkA serves multiple functions for this type III effector.

Multifunctional domains of T3SS effector proteins are an emerging theme in Yersinia. For example, the Yersinia T3SS effector YopH is a 468-amino acid protein tyrosine phosphatase, responsible for disruption of focal adhesions and inhibition of integrin-mediated bacterial phagocytosis (911). The N-terminal 129 amino acids of YopH comprise chaperone- and substrate binding activities (39). Additionally, the first 100 residues of YopT, a Yersinia cysteine protease that affects the host actin cytoskeleton by targeting Rho GTPases, contain a chaperone binding site and are essential for binding to Rho GTPases (40). Thus, Yersinia has evolved bacterial virulence factors to exploit the multifunctionality of a single modular domain, as is the case for the YpkA, YopH, and YopT N-terminal domains.

Membrane Localization and Substrate Specificity

Yersinia effector proteins are translocated to different subcellular locations within the target cell, emphasizing the complexity of the strategy used by Yersinia to neutralize host defenses. YopE, a Yersinia GTPase-activating protein for RhoA, Rac1 and Cdc42, is targeted to the perinuclear region of a cell, where all three GTPases are localized (28). YopH localizes to focal adhesion complexes, where it is in close proximity to its substrates (28). Yersinia-delivered YopT is targeted to the plasma membrane, where RhoA is located (7). Upon translocation into the host cell, the N terminus of YpkA localizes the protein to the inner surface of the host cell plasma membrane, where it is in close proximity to key proteins involved in transducing extracellular signals into eukaryotic cells. Groves et al. demonstrated the importance of YpkA subcellular localization to the plasma membrane for RhoGTPase binding (33). YpkA was shown to selectively inhibit Rac-dependent Fcγ receptor-mediated phagocytosis by specifically targeting endogenous membrane-bound Rac isoforms in cells (33). More importantly, an overexpressed YopO localization deficient mutant (YopOΔ20–77) had significantly reduced anti-phagocytic ability upon challenge with IgG-sRBC (33). Our findings provide strong evidence for the importance of plasma membrane localization for interaction of YpkA with its cognate host targets. Heterotrimeric G proteins are covalently modified at or near their N termini by covalent attachment of the fatty acids myristate and/or palmitate (41). Palmitoylation on C9 and C10 of Gαq is required for membrane attachment. YpkA interferes with G protein-coupled receptor signaling by inactivating the heterotrimeric G protein Gαq. YpkA binds and phosphorylates Gαq on a critical serine residue preventing GTP binding (20). We have determined that in addition to Gαq, YpkA associates with other members of the Gαq family, but not with members of the Gα12/13, Gαi or Gαs families (data not shown). Thus, YpkA exhibits substrate specificity and acts only on a defined subset of cellular targets. Our results demonstrate that substrate binding is not a requirement for appropriate subcellular localization of YpkA. The molecular mechanism used for membrane localization by YpkA is unknown. Recently, Salomon et al. identified a conserved bacterial phosphoinositide-binding domain (BPD) present in type III effectors of both animal and plant pathogens, including YpkA. However, a YpkA truncation mutant containing a mutation of a conserved tyrosine residue (Tyr41 in Y. pseudotuberculosis and Tyr-38 in Y. enterocolitica) within the BPD could not be examined for membrane localization due to lack of expression (42). We speculate that additional YpkA kinase substrates will be targeted to the plasma membrane. Thus, the membrane localization domain mediates the full effect of YpkA function by contributing to both the kinase activity and the GDI activity of the C-terminal domain.

Multisite Phosphorylation Regulates Kinase Activity

Our data indicate that YpkA kinase activity is regulated by multisite autophosphorylation within its N-terminal domain (amino acids 1 to 400). We observed the level of autophosphorylation for the YpkASA1–400 and YpkAD267A mutants to be similar. Based on our results it seems likely that serine residues within the first 150 amino acids of YpkA (YpkASA1–150) and within amino acids 150 to 400 are necessary for full activation of YpkA kinase activity. Additional one, two and three point mutations within these regions to narrow down the critical sites reduced the level of YpkA autophosphorylation, but had no effect on tubby nuclear translocation (data not shown). What advantages are offered by the complex regulation of YpkA involving multisite phosphorylation? It is conceivable that the requirement for multiple phosphorylation sites may impose a certain threshold of YpkA autophosphorylation that must be obtained for activation of YpkA. In this way, a low level of YpkA autophosphorylation would allow the kinase to phosphorylate its substrate(s), and thus, interfere with host signaling. Interestingly, YpkA is secreted in lower amounts relative to other Yersinia effectors (12). Thus, multisite phosphorylation could introduce the potential for sophisticated control over the dephosphorylation and inactivation of YpkA by host phosphatases and influence the strength and duration of YpkA kinase activity within the target cell. The multisite phosphorylation of proteins is indeed an extremely common mechanism for greatly increasing the regulatory potential of proteins. For example, the protein kinase MAPK-activated protein kinase-2 plays important roles in protecting cells against cell-damaging agents and infection. Its activation by stress-activated protein kinase-2 (SAPK2, also called p38) is accompanied by the phosphorylation of three residues, namely Thr-221, Ser-272, and Thr-334 (43). Phosphorylation of any one residue is insufficient for activation, whereas maximal activation is achieved if any two of the three sites are phosphorylated.

Despite the extensive analysis on YpkA, its mechanism of kinase activation remains enigmatic. Obviously, it is not clear how multisite phosphorylation orchestrates the activity of YpkA, and it will be of considerable interest to determine whether phosphorylation at each site is critical. Structural analysis of full-length YpkA would provide significant insights into the mechanism of YpkA kinase activation, as was reported for the C terminus of YpkA (32).

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Martin Privalsky, Charles Bevins, Jay Solnick, Rebecca Parales, Valley Stewart, and Wolf-Dietrich Heyer for critically reviewing the manuscript and Dr. Lifeng Xu for fruitful discussions in the preparation of this manuscript.

*

This work was supported in part by grants from the Hellman Fellows Program (to L. N.) and the ASM Robert D. Watkins Graduate Research Fellowship Program (to K. P.).

2
The abbreviations used are:
T3SS
type III secretion system
YpkA
Yersinia protein kinase A
OTUB1
otubain 1
CBD
chaperone-binding domain
MLD
membrane localization domain
GDI
guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor
GPCR
G protein-coupled receptor.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Cornelis G. R. (2010) The type III secretion injectisome, a complex nanomachine for intracellular 'toxin' delivery. Biol. Chem. 391, 745–751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mittal R., Peak-Chew S. Y., McMahon H. T. (2006) Acetylation of MEK2 and I kappa B kinase (IKK) activation loop residues by YopJ inhibits signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 18574–18579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mukherjee S., Keitany G., Li Y., Wang Y., Ball H. L., Goldsmith E. J., Orth K. (2006) Yersinia YopJ acetylates and inhibits kinase activation by blocking phosphorylation. Science 312, 1211–1214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mukherjee S., Hao Y. H., Orth K. (2007) A newly discovered post-translational modifcation – the acetylation of serine and threonine residues. Trends Biochem. Sci. 32, 210–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. McDonald C., Vacratsis P. O., Bliska J.B., Dixon J.E. (2003) The Yersinia virulence factor YopM forms a novel protein complex with two cellular kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 18514–18523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hentschke M., Berneking L., Belmar Campos C., Buck F., Ruckdeschel K., Aepfelbacher M. (2010) Yersinia virulence factor YopM induces sustained RSK activation by interfering with dephosphorylation. PLoS ONE 5, e13165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Shao F., Vacratsis P. O., Bao Z., Bowers K. E., Fierke C. A., Dixon J. E. (2003) Biochemical characterization of the Yersinia YopT protease: cleavage site and recognition elements in Rho GTPases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 904–909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Von Pawel-Rammingen U., Telepnev M. V., Schmidt G., Aktories K., Wolf-Watz H., Rosqvist R. (2000) GAP activity of the Yersinia YopE cytotoxin specifically targets the Rho pathway: a mechanism for disruption of actin microfilament structure. Mol. Microbiol. 36, 737–748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Guan K. L., Dixon J. E. (1990) Protein tyrosine phosphatase activity of an essential virulence determinant in Yersinia. Science 249, 553–556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Black D. S., Bliska J. B. (1997) Identification of p130Cas as a substrate of Yersinia YopH (Yop51), a bacterial protein tyrosine phosphatase that translocates into mammalian cells and targets focal adhesions. EMBO J. 16, 2730–2744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Persson C., Carballeira N., Wolf-Watz H., Fällman M. (1997) The PTPase YopH inhibits uptake of Yersinia, tyrosine phosphorylation of p130Cas and FAK, and the associated accumulation of these proteins in peripheral focal adhesions. EMBO J. 16, 2307–2318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Galyov E. E., Håkansson S., Forsberg A., Wolf-Watz H. (1993) A secreted protein kinase of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is an indispensable virulence determinant. Nature 361, 730–732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Viboud G. I., Bliska J. B. (2005) Yersinia outer proteins: role in modulation of host cell signaling responses and pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59, 69–89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bliska J. B., Wang X., Viboud G. I., Brodsky I. E. (2013) Modulation of innate immune responses by Yersinia type III secretion system translocators and effectors. Cell Microbiol. 15, 1622–1631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Shao F. (2008) Biochemical functions of Yersinia type III effectors. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11, 21–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Trosky J. E., Liverman A. D. B., Orth K. (2008) Yersinia outer proteins: Yops. Cell Microbiol. 10, 557–565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Navarro L., Alto N. M., Dixon J. E. (2005) Functions of the Yersinia effector proteins in inhibiting host immune responses. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 8, 21–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Matsumoto H., Young G. M. (2009) Translocated effectors of. Yersinia. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 12, 94–100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Aepfelbacher M. (2004) Modulation of Rho GTPases by type III secretion system translocated effectors of Yersinia. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 152, 65–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Navarro L., Koller A., Nordfelth R., Wolf-Watz H., Taylor S., Dixon J. E. (2007) Identification of a molecular target for the Yersinia protein kinase A. Mol. Cell 26, 465–477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Juris S. J., Rudolph A. E., Huddler D., Orth K., Dixon J.E. (2000) A distinctive role for the Yersinia protein kinase: actin binding, kinase activation, and cytoskeleton disruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 9431–9436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Dukuzumuremyi J. M., Rosqvist R., Hallberg B., Akerström B., Wolf-Watz H., Schesser K. (2000) The Yersinia protein kinase A is a host factor inducible RhoA/Rac-binding virulence factor. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35281–35290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Barz C., Abahji T.N., Trülzsch K., Heesemann J. (2000) The Yersinia Ser/Thr protein kinase YpkA/YopO directly interacts with the small GTPases RhoA and Rac-1. FEBS Lett. 482, 139–143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Juris S. J., Shah K., Shokat K., Dixon J. E., Vacratsis P. O. (2006) Identification of otubain 1 as a novel substrate for the Yersinia protein kinase using chemical genetics and mass spectrometry. FEBS Lett. 580, 179–183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Edelmann M. J., Kramer H. B., Altun M., Kessler B. M. (2010) Post-translational modification of the deubiquitinating enzyme otubain 1 modulates active RhoA levels and susceptibility to Yersinia invasion. FEBS J. 277, 2515–2530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Cornelis G. R. (2002) Yersinia type III secretion: send in the effectors. J. Cell Biol. 158, 401–408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Letzelter M., Sorg I., Mota L. J., Meyer S., Stalder J., Feldman M., Kuhn M., Callebaut I., Cornelis G. R. (2006) The discovery of SycO highlights a new function for type III secretion effector chaperones. EMBO J. 25, 3223–3233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Håkansson S., Galyov E. E., Rosqvist R., Wolf-Watz H. (1996) The Yersinia YpkA Ser/Thr kinase is translocated and subsequently targeted to the inner surface of the HeLa cell plasma membrane. Mol. Microbiol. 20, 593–603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Grosdent N., Maridonneau-Parini I., Sory M. P., Cornelis G. R. (2002) Role of Yops and adhesins in resistance of Yersinia enterocolitica to phagocytosis. Infect. Immun. 70, 4165–4176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Trasak C., Zenner G., Vogel A., Yüksekdag G., Rost R., Haase I., Fischer M., Israel L., Imhof A., Linder S., Schleicher M., Aepfelbacher M. (2006) Yersinia protein kinase YopO is activated by a novel G-actin binding process. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 2268–2277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wiley D. J., Nordfeldth R., Rosenzweig J., DaFonseca C. J., Gustin R., Wolf-Watz H., Schesser K. (2006) The Ser/Thr kinase activity of the Yersinia protein kinase A (YpkA) is necessary for full virulence in the mouse, mollifying phagocytes, and disrupting the eukaryotic cytoskeleton. Microb. Pathog. 40, 234–243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Prehna G., Ivanov M. I., Bliska J. B., Stebbins C. E. (2006) Yersinia virulence depends on mimicry of host Rho-family nucleotide dissociation inhibitors. Cell 126, 869–880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Groves E., Rittinger K., Amstutz M., Berry S., Holden D. W., Cornelis G. R. (2010) Sequestering of Rac by the Yersinia effector YopO blocks Fcγ receptor-mediated phagocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 4087–4098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Offermanns S. (2003) G-proteins as transducers in transmembrane signaling. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 83, 101–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wettschureck N., Offermanns S. (2005) Mammalian G proteins and their cell type specific functions. Physiol. Rev. 85, 1159–1204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Krueger K. M., Barbieri J. T. (1995) The family of bacterial ADP-ribosylating exotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8, 34–47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Rosenfeld J., Capdevielle J., Guillemot J. C., Ferrara P. (1992) In-gel digestion of proteins for internal sequence analysis after one- or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 203, 173–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Santagata S., Boggon T. J., Baird C. L., Gomez C. A., Zhao J., Shan W. S., Myszka D. G., Shapiro L. (2001) G-protein signaling through tubby proteins. Science 292, 2041–2050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Montagna L. G., Ivanov M. I., Bliska J. B. (2001) Identification of residues in the N-terminal domain of the Yersinia tyrosine phosphatase that are critical for substrate recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 5005–5011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Sorg I., Hoffmann C., Dumbach J., Aktories K., Schmidt G. (2003) The C terminus of YopT is crucial for activity and the N terminus is crucial for substrate binding. Infect. Immun. 71, 4623–4632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Chen C. A., Manning D. R. (2001) Regulation of G proteins by covalent modification. Oncogene 20, 1643–1652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Salomon D., Guo Y., Kinch L. N., Grishin N. V., Gardner K. H., Orth K. (2013) Effectors of animal and plant pathogens use a common domain to bind host phosphoinositides. Nat. Commun. 4, 2973–2982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Cohen P. (2000) The regulation of protein function by multisite phosphorylation – a 25 year update. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 596–601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES