Skip to main content
Emerging Infectious Diseases logoLink to Emerging Infectious Diseases
. 2014 Sep;20(9):1554–1558. doi: 10.3201/eid2009.140115

Risk Factors for Severe Influenza A–Related Pneumonia in Adult Cohort, Mexico, 2013–14

Alejandro Gómez-Gómez 1,2,, Martin Magaña-Aquino 1,2, Sofía Bernal-Silva 1,2, Javier Araujo-Meléndez 1,2, Andreu Comas-García 1,2, Emma Alonso-Zúñiga 1,2, Eliana Torres-Torres 1,2, Daniel E Noyola 1,2
PMCID: PMC4178407  PMID: 25148014

Abstract

During the 2013–14 influenza season, we assessed characteristics of 102 adults with suspected influenza pneumonia in a hospital in Mexico; most were unvaccinated. More comorbidities and severity of illness were found than for patients admitted during the 2009–10 influenza pandemic. Vaccination policies should focus on risk factors.

Keywords: Influenza, A(H1N1)pdm09, viruses, vaccine, pandemic, pneumonia, viral pneumonia, diabetes, intensive care, obesity, overweight, body mass index, BMI, ventilator, zoonoses


During 2009, Mexico reported 3 outbreaks of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection (1); during the 2011–12 winter, a fourth pandemic wave of illness attributed to the virus was reported (2). Many patients had severe pneumonia related to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus; the death rate was higher in Mexico than in most countries (35).

Beginning December 5, 2013, admissions of adults with acute respiratory infections increased at Hospital Central “Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto” (Hospital Central), in San Luis Potosí, Mexico; 102 persons were admitted with suspected influenza pneumonia. A high proportion of patients required mechanical ventilation (MV) and intensive care. The number of acute respiratory infection–associated admissions of young children and older adults did not increase. This pattern, occurring nearly 5 years after the initial influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 outbreak, resembles that of the initial outbreak in San Luis Potosí in April 2009 (6). This raises questions regarding possible changes in the viral strain or the presence of large numbers of susceptible persons not exposed to, or vaccinated against, this virus. We analyzed characteristics of 102 patients with confirmed or suspected influenza pneumonia admitted during a 2-month period and compared them with those of 100 patients with confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09 infection hospitalized during the 2009–10 pandemic.

The Study

During December 5, 2013–February 7, 2014, 102 patients, 17–79 years of age, were admitted to Hospital Central with acute onset of cough or rhinorrhea plus dyspnea, fever, and radiographic evidence of pneumonia and were considered to have possible influenza pneumonia. We compared data for the 2013–14 cohort with data from patients 15–71 years of age with confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection admitted to Hospital Central during the 2009–10 pandemic (7). Patients were evaluated according to a clinical questionnaire (6,7); blood samples (laboratory tests and cultures), sputum samples or tracheal aspirates (Gram stain and culture), and chest radiographs were also evaluated. Nasopharyngeal or tracheal samples were analyzed to detect influenza virus by using real-time reverse transcription PCR (Laboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública, Servicios de Salud del Estado de San Luis Potosí) or sequence-specific primer PCR (Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí) with previously reported primers (8). Empiric treatment (ceftriaxone and clarithromycin or ceftriaxone and levofloxacin) was administered, and a course of oseltamivir was started within 6 hours after admission at doses of 75–150 mg 2× daily.

Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus was detected in 47 patients and influenza A (not subtyped) in 8 patients; samples were not submitted for virologic testing for 8 patients. In 28 (71.8%) of 39 patients with negative results by real-time and sequence-specific primer reverse transcription PCR, samples were collected >5 days after onset of symptoms or patients had received oseltamivir during >1 day at the time of sample collection; therefore, test results for those patients were not conclusive, and the patients were included in the cohort. Signs and symptoms of the remaining 11 patients with negative results and of the 8 untested patients were suggestive of influenza infection; therefore, they were included in the cohort.

Mean age of the 102 patients was 44.6 years; 52 (51%) were female, and 82 (80.4%) had risk factors for complications. The most common concurrent health conditions were obesity (63[62%]) and diabetes mellitus (23 [23%]). Eight (8%) patients had been vaccinated for 2013–14 seasonal influenza. Radiologic manifestations were bilateral ground glass opacities and consolidations. Most patients had severe illness; mean partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen ratio on admission was 175.6 (reference value 400; SD 74.4); 52 (50.9%) patients required MV.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1. The 52 patients receiving MV were more likely to be obese (body mass index [BMI] >30) than those who did not require it (76.5% vs. 46.9%, respectively; p = 0.002). Lactate dehydrogenase concentrations (406.8 mg/dL vs. 694.6 mg/dL; p = 0.006) and C-reactive protein level (12.9 mg/dL vs. 19.7 mg/dL; p = 0.001) were higher in patients who required MV.

Table 1. Characteristics of 102 patients with severe pneumonia who required mechanical ventilation compared with patients who did not require mechanical ventilation, San Luis Potosi, Mexico, 2013–14*.

Characteristic Without mechanical ventilation (n = 50) With mechanical ventilation (n = 52) p value
Age, y, mean (SD) 42.8 (13.6) 46.2 (13.3)
Gender, no. (%)
M 25 (50) 25 (48.1%) 0.21
F 25 (50) 27 (51.9%) 0.85
Presence of ≥1 underlying conditions, no. (%) 38 (76) 44 (84.6%) 0.27
Obesity (body mass index >30) † 23 (46.9) 39 (76.5%) 0.002
Diabetes mellitus 12 (24) 11 (21.2%) 0.73
Immunosuppression‡ 4 (8) 5 (9.6%) 1.0
Asthma-COPD-bronchiectasis 8 (16) 1 (1.9%) 0.01
Other § 9 (18) 3 (5.8%) 0.06
Underlying disorders, excluding obesity, no. (%) 27 (54) 21 (40.4%) 0.17
Influenza vaccination during most recent season, no. (%) 8 (16) 0 0.002
Signs and symptoms, no. (%)
Fever 49 (98) 52 (100%) 0.49
Headache 45 (90) 49 (94.2%) 0.48
Cough 50 (100) 52 (100%) NA
Myalgias 46 (92) 46 (88.5%) 0.74
Dyspnea 50 (100) 52 (100%) NA
Blood-streaked sputum 14 (28) 15 (28.8%) 0.92
Diarrhea 9 (18) 6 (11.5%) 0.36
Clinical findings, mean (SD)
Body mass index* 29.6 (4.8) 31.9 (3.9) 0.01
Respiratory rate, bpm 26.4 (3.3) 30.3 (5) <0.001
Cardiac rate, bpm 102.6 (12.4) 109.2 (16.9) 0.03
Mean blood pressure, mmHg 80.6 (11.3) 74.2 (14.6) 0.01
Temperature, °C 38.5 (0.5) 38.5 (0.5) 0.42
PaO2/FiO2 236 (49.2) 119.8 (43.8) <0.001
Laboratory findings, mean (SD)
Total WBCs, x103/μL† 8.1 (4.3) 7.4 (3.9) 0.39
Lymphocytes, x103/μL† 1.2 (0.75) 0.84 (0.64) 0.01
Platelet count, x103/μL† 223.5 (93.1) 212.4 (125.4) 0.62
C-reactive protein, mg/dL† 12.9 (8.8) 19.7 (11.6) 0.001
Lactate dehydrogenase, U/L # 406.8 (416.6) 694.6 (547.4) 0.006
CPK, U/L ** 349.5 (760.1) 575.9 (544.4) 0.1
Symptom onset
Duration of symptoms before dyspnea, d, mean (SD) 2.8 (2.8) 3.1 (3.3) 0.67
Dyspnea duration before admission, d, mean (SD) 3.9 (2.8) 3.7 (2.7) 0.75
Duration of symptoms before hospital admission, d, mean (SD) 6.7 (3.8) 6.6 (3.5) 0.99

*Statistical analyses used included Fisher exact test, χ2 test, and Student t test. SD, standard deviation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PaO2/FiO2, partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen ratio; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; U/L, units per liter.
†Data available for 100 patients
‡Immunosuppressed patients include patients with autoimmune disorders (4 cases; one of them with renal transplantation), HIV infection (3 cases), lymphoma (1 case), and chronic renal failure (1 case).
§Other disorders include cardiopathy (5 cases), Down syndrome (3 cases; 1 with cardiopathy), hypothyroidism (3 cases), pregnancy (1 case), and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (1 case)
¶Data available for 98 patients
#Data available for 93 patients
**Data available for 91 patients

To assess severity of illness and possible associated factors, we compared characteristics of the 55 patients with confirmed influenza A infection and 100 patients with A(H1N1)pdm09 infection admitted during the 2009–10 pandemic (Table 2). Patients in the 2013–14 cohort were somewhat older and heavier than those in the 2009–10 cohort: mean age of patients admitted during 2009–10 was 38.9 y and that of patients admitted during 2013–14 was 46.1 y (p = 0.002; Figure 1). Mean BMI of the 2009–10 cohort was 28.9, versus 31.9 for the 2013–14 cohort (p<0.001). Mean partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen ratio was not significantly different for the 2 groups; however, proportion of those needing MV was significantly higher in the 2013–14 cohort (36/55 [65.5%] than in the 2009–10 cohort (47/100 [47%];p = 0.03).

Table 2. Demographic features of adult patients admitted with confirmed influenza virus pneumonia during December 5, 2013–February 7, 2014 compared with patients with confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection during the 2009–10 pandemic period, San Luis Potosí, Mexico*.

Characteristics 2009–10, n = 100 2013–14, n = 55  p value
Age, y, mean (SD) median (range) 38.9 (13.1), 37 (15–71) 46.1 (14), 45 (19–79) 0.002
Sex, no. (%)
M 52 (52) 28 (50.9) 0.89
F 48 (48) 27 (49.1)
Presence of ≥1 underlying conditions, no. (%) 68 (68) 47 (85.5) 0.017
Obesity (body mass index>30)† 39 (39.8) 40 (74.1) <0.001
Diabetes mellitus 20 (20) 15 (27.3) 0.3
Immunosuppression 8 (8) ‡ 3 (5.5) § 0.75
Asthma-COPD-bronchiectasis 9 (9) 2 (3.6) 0.33
Other 19 (19) 4 (7.3) # 0.049
Any underlying disorder excluding obesity, no. (%) 45 (45) 23 (41.8) 0.7
Influenza vaccination during most recent season, no. (%)** 4 (4) 3 (5.5) 0.7
Clinical findings
Body mass index, mean (SD) † 28.9 (5.9) 31.9 (3.9) <0.001
PaO2/FiO2, mean (SD) †† 152.1 (102.5) 156.2 (69.3) 0.32
Total WBCs, K/μL, mean (SD) † 8.4 (5.3) 6.4 (3.2) 0.02
Lymphocytes, K/μL, mean (SD) ‡‡ 0.94 (0.5) 0.85 (0.72) 0.37
C-reactive protein, mg/dL, mean (SD) § § 14.1 (9.8) 17.9 (10.9) 0.03
Lactate dehydrogenase, U/L, mean (SD) ¶¶ 1,099.4 (769.6) 581.8 (387.9) <0.001
Creatine phosphokinase, U/L, mean (SD) ## 530 (820.6) 480.6 (513.9) 0.69
Duration of symptoms before dyspnea, days, mean (SD) *** 2.1 (3.5) 3 (3.4) 0.13
Dyspnea duration before admission, days, mean (SD) ††† 2.7 (2.7) 3.8 (2.6) 0.03
Duration of symptoms before hospital admission, days, mean (SD) ** 4.7 (6.6) 6.6 (3.8) 0.003
Other features
Requirement for mechanical ventilation, no. (%) 47 (47) 36 (65.5) 0.03
Death within 5 d from admission, no. (%) 6 (6) 6 (10.9) 0.35

*Statistical analyses used included Fisher exact test, chi-square test, Student t test, and Mann Whitney u test; S/D, standard deviation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PaO2/FiO2, partial pressure arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen ratio; U/L, units per liter. 
† Data was available for 152 patients.
‡ Includes chronic renal failure (4 cases), chronic steroid use (3 cases), and leukemia (1 case).
§ HIV infection (1 case), autoimmune disorder (2 cases; 1 had renal transplant),
¶ Some patients had >1 underlying condition: heart failure (6 cases), pregnancy/puerperium (6 cases), hypothyroidism (4 cases), seizure disorder (2 cases), ischemic cardiopathy (1 case), microcephaly (1 case), Down syndrome (1 case), obstructive sleep apnea (1 case).
# Down syndrome (2 cases); hypothyroidism (1 case), cardiopathy (1 case).
** Data available for 154 patients.
†† Data available for 147 patients.
‡‡ Data available for 151 patients.
§ § Data available for 144 patients.
¶¶ Data available for 135 patients.
## Data available for 131 patients.
*** Data available for 139 patients
††† Data available for 138 patients

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Patients with confirmed influenza pneumonia admitted to “Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto” (Hospital Central), in San Luis Potosí, Mexico during 2009–10 and 2013–14, according to age group.

By the time of this report, 29 of the 102 patients admitted during 2013–14 had died, 69 had been discharged, and 4 remained hospitalized. Of 29 deaths, 11 (37.9%) occurred within 5 days of admission. The rate of deaths within 5 days of admission was 10.9% among patients with confirmed influenza infection admitted during 2013–14, and 6% among those admitted during 2009–10 (p = 0.35). In contrast to findings with the 2009–10 cohort, duration of symptoms among the 2013–14 cohort at the time of admission did not appear to affect the outcome (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A) Proportion of patients with confirmed influenza pneumonia that required mechanical ventilation according to the duration of symptoms on admission (0–4 days versus >5 days) during the 2009–10 pandemic and 2013–14 season. B) Mortality rate within 5 days of admission according to the duration of symptoms on admission during the 2009–10 pandemic and 2013–14.

In Mexico, the first 3 influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 waves were characterized by a high proportion of hospitalizations among persons 5–59 years of age (1,9); in the fourth wave, the proportion of hospitalizations increased in young children and older adults (2). The 2013–14 influenza season data resemble those of the initial A(H1N1)pdm09 outbreak in the high number of severe cases among adults <80 years and, although this observation has been described in other pandemics (10), possible explanations for this epidemiologic pattern should be analyzed. The following characteristics of the 2013–14 influenza season cohort could explain this demographic situation: 1) low vaccination coverage of high-risk populations; 2) differences in the size of the high-risk susceptible population; 3) high prevalence of diabetes mellitus and obesity; 4) antigenic drift; and 5) unusually low environmental temperatures during the 2013–14 winter season. The severity of pneumonia cases among adults <80 years of age during the 2013–14 influenza season, characterized by MV requirement, low lymphocyte counts, and high C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase concentrations, could be explained by a high prevalence of concurrent health conditions (especially obesity), delay in health care access, or a change in virulence of the current influenza strain.

Conclusions

Because of the high number of unvaccinated patients in this study cohort, the need to modify the intended population for influenza vaccination policies should be assessed. The vaccination rate was substantially lower among patients who required MV compared with those who did not; the overall vaccination rate among hospitalized patients contrasts with the high vaccination rates reported recently in Mexico for high-risk groups (71.7%–101.9%) (11,12). The association between severe influenza infection and obesity has been increasingly documented since the 2009 pandemic (13). Therefore, this group should be included among persons at high risk for influenza complications and the BMI range of subjects that require vaccination should include not only those with morbid obesity, but also those weighing >30 kg/m2.

To improve outcomes, additional measures could be implemented such as campaigns and educational programs for the public and physicians that advocate early diagnosis, treatment, and identification of influenza-associated complications. In summary, to establish appropriate preventive measures, the epidemiologic characteristics of influenza outbreaks should be used to identify risk factors for severe infections.

Acknowledgments

We thank authorities at the Hospital Central “Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto” and Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí for their support.

Biography

Dr Gómez-Gómez is a pulmonologist at Hospital Central “Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto” in San Luis Potosí. His research interests include respiratory infections with a focus on influenza and tuberculosis.

Footnotes

Suggested citation for this article: Gómez-Gómez A, Magaña-Aquino M, Bernal-Silva S, Araujo-Meléndez J, Comas-García A, Alonso-Zúñiga E, et al. Risk factors for severe influenza A virus pneumonia in adult cohort, Mexico, 2013–14. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Sept [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2014.140115

References

  • 1.Chowell G, Echevarría-Zuno S, Viboud C, Simonsen L, Tamerius J, Miller MA, et al. Characterizing the epidemiology of the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic in Mexico. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000436. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Borja-Aburto VH, Chowell G, Viboud C, Simonsen L, Miller MA, Grajales-Muñiz C, et al. Epidemiological characterization of a fourth wave of pandemic A/H1N1 influenza in Mexico, winter 2011–2012: age shift and severity. Arch Med Res. 2012;43:563–70. 10.1016/j.arcmed.2012.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Simonsen L, Spreeuwenberg P, Lustig R, Taylor RJ, Fleming DM, Kroneman M, et al. Global mortality estimates for the 2009 influenza pandemic from the GLaMOR project: a modeling study. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001558. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Charu V, Chowell G, Palacio-Mejia LS, Echeverría-Zuno S, Borja-Aburto VH, Simonsen L, et al. Mortality burden of the A/H1N1 pandemic in Mexico: a comparison of deaths and years of life lost to seasonal influenza. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:985–93. 10.1093/cid/cir644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Comas-García A, García-Sepúlveda CA, Méndez-de Lira JJ, Aranda-Romo S, Hernández-Salinas AE. Mortality attributable to pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 in San Luis Potosi, Mexico. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2011;5:76–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Gómez-Gómez A, Magaña-Aquino M, García-Sepúlveda CA, Ochoa-Pérez UR, Falcón-Escobedo R, Comas-García A, et al. Severe pneumonia associated with pandemic (H1N1) 2009 outbreak, San Luis Potosí, Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:27–34. 10.3201/eid1601.090941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lovato-Salas F, Matienzo-Serment L, Monjarás-Ávila C, Godoy-Lozano E, Comas-Garcia A, Aguilera-Barragán M, et al. Pandemic influenza A(H1N1) 2009 and respiratory syncytial virus associated hospitalizations. J Infect. 2010;61:382–90. 10.1016/j.jinf.2010.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.World Health Organization. CDC protocol of realtime RTPCR for influenza A(H1N1). Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/CDCRealtimeRTPCR_SwineH1Assay-2009_20090430.pdf Accessed on January 15, 2014.
  • 9.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Update: novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infections-worldwide, May 6, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:453–8 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5817a1.htm. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Miller MA, Viboud C, Balinska M, Simonsen L. The signature features of influenza pandemics. Implications for policy. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2595–8. 10.1056/NEJMp0903906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ropero-Álvarez AM, Kurtis HJ, Danovaro-Holliday MC, Ruiz-Matus C, Andrus JK. Expansion of seasonal influenza vaccination in the Americas. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:361. 10.1186/1471-2458-9-361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ropero-Álvarez AM, Whittembury A, Kurtis HJ, dos Santos T, Danovaro-Holliday MC, Ruiz-Matus C. Pandemic influenza vaccination: lessons learned from Latin America and the Caribbean. Vaccine. 2012;30:916–21. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mertz D, Hyong-Kim T, Johnstone J, Lam PP, Science M, Kuster SP, et al. Populations at risk of severe or complicated influenza illness: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f5061. 10.1136/bmj.f5061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES